DOCSLIB.ORG

Deuteronomy Humash 5

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Deuteronomy Humash 5 Inquire And Explore With Wisdom Rabbi Michael Graetz הרב מיכאל מרדכי יוסף גרץ תורה שבעל פה Talking Torah How Torah Talks to Us when We Talk Torah A case presentation of the Process of Midrash through generations, which shows how the basic ideas of Judaism were mined and refined from the gold lode of Torah. דברים Volume 5 Deuteronomy Special Shabbatot and Selected Haftarot Omer, Israel 5775 1 Contents Parasha Page Devarim 3 Va-Ethanan 18 Ekev 29 Re'eh 41 Shoftim 51 Ki Tezei 60 Ki Tavo 74 Nitzavim 84 Va-Yelekh 92 Ha'azinu 98 Ve-zot ha-Brakha 111 Special Shabbatot and Haftarot 123 KEY TO TALKING TORAH THEMES 1 H Hebrew language as basis of Midrash and as structure of Torah 2 L Literary characteristics of Midrash 3 MI Midah ke-neged Midah [narrative meaning] 4 T Theology in Midrash 5 K Knowledge and Intellectual power are part of the Holy Spirit which exists because of the partnership of man and God 6 E Egalitarian ideas in Midrash 7 P Pluralism as basis of Judaism's view of humanity 8 U Universal vs. Particular in Midrash 9 M Moral and ethical considerations in Midrash 10 HA Halakha and development of halakha 11 TA Ta’am Mitzvot reasons for Mitzvot 12 PR Prayer 13 B Basic ideas of Judaism 14 ED Education 2 BOOK OF DEUTERONOMY דברים Parashat Devarim *Deut. 1, 1 - 4 These are the words that Moses addressed to all Israel on the other side of the Jordan. Through the wilderness, in the Arabah near Suph, between Paran and Tophel, Laban, Hazeroth, and Di-zahab, it is eleven days from Horeb to Kadesh-barnea by the Mount Seir route. It was in the fortieth year, on the first day of the eleventh month, that Moses addressed the Israelites in accordance with the instructions that the Lord had given him for them. The beginning of the book of Deuteronomy sets a very specific scene. The location and time are spelled out meticulously. In contrast with most biblical accounts when place and time, the setting of the scene, is unclear or even not told at all, this scene is fixed clearly. We read: "These are the words that Moses addressed to all Israel on the other side of the Jordan. Through the wilderness, in the Arabah near Suph, between Paran and Tophel, Laban, Hazeroth, and Di-zahab, it is eleven days from Horeb to Kadesh-barnea by the Mount Seir route. It was in the fortieth year, on the first day of the eleventh month, that Moses addressed the Israelites in accordance with the instructions that the Lord had given him for them." (Deut. 1, 1-4) The place and time are clear, but there is a parenthetical phrase, "it is eleven days from Horeb to Kadesh-barnea by the Mount Seir route" (v. 2), which is the source of much discussion in Jewish tradition. Why does the Torah tell us this bit of information? We get the exact location which can be coordinated by its place in the center of the places named which are around it. We get the exact time in verse 4. What is the point of telling us that it is 11 days journey from Horeb, that is Mt. Sinai, to Kadesh Barnea? The Midrashic and exegetical tradition understand this phrase as a reminder that the route from Egypt to the land of Israel was very short. It is part of Moses' greatest disappointment, namely that the main goal of his vision and mission was not achieved. A mere 11 days after leaving Egypt the mission to enter the land of Israel could have been fulfilled, but the people transgressed by following the report of the spies. They were almost there, and the incident of the spies intruded. Rashbam has the period of travel even less. He says that the walk to Hatzerot was only 3 days from Horeb. But, then Miriam died, and the nation waited 7 days for her mourning period. The 11th day was the walk from Hatzerot to Kadesh Barnea. (Rashbam on Deut. 1, 2) For Ibn Ezra the 11 day period was the first period of learning of God's commands while on the way from Horeb to Kadesh Barnea. Then the spies were sent out and the nation was destined to return to the desert for 40 years. Now, when they finally return to Kadesh Barnea on the eve of their entry to the land, and the eve of Moses' death, Moses again teaches God's commands. Ibn Ezra says that NO mitzvoth were learned in the interval. Indeed, there are more mitzvoth in Deuteronomy that anywhere else in the Torah. (Ibn Ezra on Deut. 1, 2) The notion that there was no communication with God during the 40 years is a powerful one. Moses did not teach during all that time. This may explain why at the end he crams so much into his last words in the book of Deuteronomy. Perhaps he 3 was waiting for the new generation, but for me this is a lesson in how NOT to lead. We so often put off study or thought in the frenzy of doing things that seem so essential to existence. Perhaps we are meant to learn that we should not put off discussing Torah even if the situation and those present seem not to be fit for such learning. TTT 215 ED The idea that the 11 days period is the real time needed for the nation to get to Israel and it is a kind of mocking of their transgression appears in a most provocative passage. The Boethesians (B's) and the Rabbis debate the issue of the date of the holiday of Shavuot. Since the counting of the Omer is to begin "mi-maharat ha- Shabbat", the B's claimed that it had to begin on a Sunday, and thus Shavuot always fell on Sunday 7 weeks later. The Rabbis interpreted the phrase to mean after the first day of Pesah, and thus Shavuot could fall on many different days of the week. One of the B's taunts R. Yohanan B. Zaccai and says that it is clear why Moses made Shavuot to always fall on a Sunday. Since Moses wanted to be kind to Israel he worked it out so that Shavuot, which was only a one day holiday, would always fall after Shabbat so that people would have two days of rest. Moses invented the long weekend according to the B's. To this R. Yohanan responds: "if Moses loved Israel so much, and he could have taken them into Israel in 11 days (quoting our verse), then why did he make them traipse around the desert for 40 years!" (Menahot 65a-b) Another Midrash sees our phrase as an allegorical scorning of Israel's transgression. Since the number 11 in Hebrew is made up of two words, one and ten, this Midrash has Moses hinting to Israel that of the 10 commandments that you received at Horeb, you transgressed only 1, namely that you shall have no other gods. That is, the sin of the golden cow created the conditions which led to the refusal to enter the land. (Midrash Tanaim to Deut. 1, 2) Another Midrash also puts the 11 day period into the context of the sin of the golden calf. The nation waited for Moses to return for 40 days, and it was because of this long waiting period that in the end they turned to idolatry. This Midrash asks how many days of this period were they faithful to God, and when exactly did they start to plan the move to idolatry. There are many opinions in this Midrash. One is that they were faithful to God for the first 11 days, and for the remaining 29 days they worked on the idol. This turns the phrase into something else, "eleven days from Horeb" is the time that they remained whole with God. The grandiose revelation and religious experience at Horeb had a short life in people's hearts. Without leadership and constant learning it is impossible to keep up the influence even of direct revelation. This is also a telling lesson about the need for constant Talmud Torah and for the life of practice of mitzvoth. (Deut. R. (Lieberman ed.) 10) Finally, the notion that the 11 days are stated as a strong reminder of the nation's transgression for refusing to enter the land of Israel is used in a fascinating response of R. Menashe Klein, the admor of Kiriat Ungwar in Jerusalem. He explains why women are exempt from the mitzvah of sitting in a sukkah. It has nothing, he claims, to do with positive commands which are time bound. He explains that if the nation would have entered the land after 11 days, as our verse so scornfully reminds us, there would have been no need for Sukkot. Sukkot were God's miraculous gift of 4 protection in the desert, and they were only necessary because the nation went back into the desert instead of into the land! Thus, explains R. Klein, the women who did not give up the vision of Israel, who wanted to enter the land on the 11th day (cf. Rashi on Num. 27, 1) did not need Sukkot. They also did not want to build the golden cow, nor did they participate in other transgressions of the wilderness. The Sukkot were only for those who had transgressed by not loving the land enough. This explains, according to Klein, the question of the Tosafot (Pes.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ONEIROCRITICS and MIDRASH on Reading Dreams and the Scripture
    ONEIROCRITICS AND MIDRASH On Reading Dreams and the Scripture Erik Alvstad A bstr act In the context of ancient theories of dreams and their interpretation, the rabbinic literature offers particularly interesting loci. Even though the view on the nature of dreams is far from un- ambiguous, the rabbinic tradition of oneirocritics, i.e. the discourse on how dreams are interpreted, stands out as highly original. As has been shown in earlier research, oneirocritics resembles scriptural interpretation, midrash, to which it has lent some of its exegetical rules. This article will primarily investigate the interpreter’s role in the rabbinic practice of dream interpretation, as reflected in a few rabbinic stories from the two Talmuds and from midrashim. It is shown that these narrative examples have some common themes. They all illustrate the polysemy of the dream-text, and how the person who puts an interpretation on it constructs the dream’s significance. Most of the stories also emphasize that the outcome of the dream is postponed until triggered by its interpretation. Thus the dreams are, in a sense, pictured as prophetic – but it is rather the interpreter that constitutes the prophetic instance, not the dream itself. This analysis is followed by a concluding discussion on the analogical relation between the Scripture and the dream-text, and the interpretative practices of midrash and oneirocritics. he striking similarities between the rabbinic traditions of Scriptural exegesis, midrash, and the rabbinic practice of Tdream interpretation,
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Eugenics, and Other Essays
    JEWISH EUGENICS AND OTHER ESSAYS THREE PAPERS READ BEFORE THE NEW YORK BOARD OF JEWISH MINISTERS 1915 I JEWISH EUGENICS By Rabbi Max Reichler II THE DEFECTIVE IN JEWISH LAW AND LITERATURE By Rabbi Joel Blau III CAPITAL PUNISHMENT AMONG THE JEWS By Rev. Dr. D. de Sola Pool NEW YORK BLOCH PUBLISHING COMPANY 1916 <=> k Copyright, 1916, by BLOCH PUBLISHING COMPANY CONTENTS I. Jewish Eugenics 7 II. The Defective in Jewish Law and Literature 23 III. Capital Punishment Among the Jews . 53 424753 Jewish Eugenics Rabbi Max Reichler. B. A. JEWISH EUGENICS Who knows the cause of Israel's survival? Why- did the Jew survive the onslaughts of Time, when others, numerically and politically stronger, suc- cumbed? Obedience to the Law of Life, declares the modern student of eugenics, was the saving quality which rendered the Jewish race immune from disease and destruction. "The Jews, ancient and modern," says Dr. Stanton Coit, "have always understood the science of eugenics, and have gov- erned themselves in accordance with it; hence the 1 preservation of the Jewish race." I. Jewish Attitude To be sure eugenics as a science could hardly have existed among the ancient Jews; but many eugenic rules were certainly incorporated in the large collection of Biblical and Rabbinical laws. Indeed there are clear indications of a conscious effort to utilize all influences that might improve the inborn qualities of the Jewish race, and to guard against any practice that might vitiate the purity of 1 Ci. also Social Direction of Human Evolution, by Prof. William E. Kellicott, 1911, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Dngd Zkqn Massekhet Hahammah
    dngd zkqn Massekhet HaHammah Compiled and Translated with Commentary by Abe Friedman A Project of the Commission on Social Justice and Public Policy of the Leadership Council of Conservative Judaism Rabbi Leonard Gordon, Chair suntractate@gmail.com Table of Contents Preface i Introduction v Massekhet HaHammah 1. One Who Sees the Sun 1 2. Creation of the Lights 5 3. Righteous and Wicked 9 4. Sun and Sovereignty 15 5. The Fields of Heaven 20 6. Star-Worshippers 28 7. Astrology and Omens 32 8. Heavenly Praise 41 9. Return and Redemption 45 Siyyum for Massekhet HaHammah 51 Bibliography 54 Preface Massekhet HaHammah was developed with the support of the Commission on Social Justice and Public Policy of the Conservative Movement in response to the “blessing of the sun” (Birkat HaHammah), a ritual that takes place every 28 years and that will fall this year on April 8, 2009 / 14 Nisan 5769, the date of the Fast of the Firstborn on the eve of Passover. A collection of halakhic and aggadic texts, classic and contemporary, dealing with the sun, Massekhet HaHammah was prepared as a companion to the ritual for Birkat HaHammah. Our hope is that rabbis and communities will study this text in advance of the Fast and use it both for adult learning about this fascinating ritual and as the text around which to build a siyyum, a celebratory meal marking the conclusion of a block of text study and releasing firstborn in the community from the obligation to fast on the eve of the Passover seder.1 We are also struck this year by the renewed importance of our focus on the sun given the universal concern with global warming and the need for non-carbon-based renewable resources, like solar energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Garoongelman Hagaddah Companion 2020
    Finding (an) order in pandem(on)ic times We’re thrilled you’ve joined us for this second seder of Pesach 5780 (2020). Our family accepted an invitation from our shul and rabbi to host a traditional seder that would speak, broadly, to social justice, for folks of every age. To that end, we’ve assembled this companion to your own Haggadah. We’ll move through the seder traditionally, yet pause before each step to read reflect on, and respond to selected texts. We hope they’ll spark conversation! The texts feature a range of themes: liberty, bondage, power, and oppression; silence, voice, language, and narrative; boundaries and our passages through (and over) them; brokenness and repair; imagination, dream, and reality… … but our overarching theme is time. Time is of crucial importance to the seder. There’s the rabbis’ extended commentary on the time it should be held; there’s also its stress on timelines, lineages, ancestors, and generations. Yet the COVID-19 pandemic has turned our sense of time upside down. It’s difficult for many of us to keep track of what day it is, never mind what hour. קֶדֶ֥צ קֶדֶ֖צ ,How do we continue to pursue justice (per the Torah’s injunction in the midst of such troubling times? How do we find the time for ( ֹדְּרִתּ ףְִֹ֑ advocacy and action? And when we do find it, how do we best use it? And we’re (even more) interested in themes you see and want to discuss, especially in the face of the many challenges of life in a time of pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Chukat, Torah
    Chukat, Torah במדבר י״ט:א׳-כ׳:כ״א Numbers 19:1-20:21 (1) The LORD spoke to Moses and Aaron, (א) ַוְיַד ֵ ֣בּר ְי ֹהָ֔וה ֶאל־ ֹמ ֶ ֥שׁה ְו ֶ ֽאל־ ַא ֲה֖ ֹרן saying: (2) This is the ritual law that the ֵלא ֹֽמר׃ (ב) ֚ ֹזאת ֻחַ ֣קּת ַהתּוָֹ֔רה ֲא ֶשׁר־ ִ ָצ ֥וּה LORD has commanded: Instruct the ְי ֹ ָה ֖וה ֵלא ֹ֑מר ַדּ ֵ ֣בּר ׀ ֶאל־ ְבֵּ ֣ני ִי ְשָׂר ֵ֗אל ְוִי ְק ֣חוּ Israelite people to bring you a red cow without blemish, in which there is no defect ֵא ֶ֩לי ֩ ָפָ ֨רה ֲאֻד ָ֜מּה ְתּ ִמי ָ֗מה ֲא ֶ ֤שׁר ֵ ֽאין־ ָבּ ֙הּ and on which no yoke has been laid. (3) You ֔מוּם ֲא ֶ ֛שׁר ֹלא־ ָﬠָ ֥לה ָﬠֶ ֖לי ָה ֹֽﬠל׃ (ג) וּ ְנ ַתֶ ֣תּם shall give it to Eleazar the priest. It shall be ֹא ָ֔תהּ ֶאל־ ֶא ְל ָﬠָ ֖זר ַה ֹכּ ֵ ֑הן ְוהוֹ ִ ֤ציא ֹא ָת ֙הּ taken outside the camp and slaughtered in ֶאל־ ִמ ֣חוּץ ַֽל ַמּ ֲחֶ֔נה ְו ָשׁ ַ ֥חט ֹא ָ ֖תהּ ְל ָפָֽניו׃ (ד) his presence. (4) Eleazar the priest shall take some of its blood with his finger and ְו ָל ַ֞קח ֶא ְל ָﬠָ ֧זר ַה ֹכּ ֵ ֛הן ִמָדּ ָ ֖מהּ ְבּ ֶא ְצ ָבּ ֑ﬠוֹ ְו ִהָ֞זּה sprinkle it seven times toward the front of ֶאל־ ֹ֨נ ַכח ְפֵּ ֧ני ֹֽא ֶהל־מוֹ ֵ ֛ﬠד ִמָדּ ָ ֖מהּ ֶ ֥שׁ ַבע the Tent of Meeting. (5) The cow shall be ְפּ ָﬠ ִֽמים׃ (ה) ְו ָשַׂ ֥רף ֶאת־ ַה ָפָּ ֖רה ְל ֵﬠיָ ֑ניו burned in his sight—its hide, flesh, and ֶאת־ ֹעָ ֤רהּ ְו ֶאת־ ְבּ ָשָׂר ֙הּ ְו ֶאת־ָדּ ָ֔מהּ —blood shall be burned, its dung included (6) and the priest shall take cedar wood, ַﬠל־ ִפְּר ָ ֖שׁהּ ִי ְשֽׂ ֹרף׃ (ו) ְו ָל ַ ֣קח ַה ֹכּ ֵ֗הן ֵ ֥ﬠץ ֶ ֛אֶרז hyssop, and crimson stuff, and throw them ְו ֵא֖זוֹב וּ ְשִׁ ֣ני תוָֹ ֑ל ַﬠת ְו ִה ְשׁ ִ֕לי ֶאל־ ֖תּוֹ into the fire consuming the cow.
    [Show full text]
  • The Price of Mediation: the Role of Priests in the Priestly Halakhah
    THE PRICE OF MEDIATION: THE ROLE OF PRIESTS IN THE PRIESTLY HALAKHAH Cana Werman Any discussion of facets of the Qumran writings is a risky task given the issues that are still being debated and the lack of consensus regard- ing numerous key questions. Nonetheless, most scholars nowadays would tend to concur that the halakhic dispute between the Qumran community members and the group(s) influenced by the Pharisaic position played a decisive role in the community members’ decision to withdraw from Jerusalem and live in isolation. Attempts to better understand the origin and specifics of this halakhic dispute must come to grips with methodological obstacles.1 The halakhic system embedded in the Qumran writings is the one that was accepted by the Community, and was partly created within its own confines after the withdrawal and after its decision to adopt a 364-day calendar that had never been used in the Land of Israel before.2 The Qumranic halakhic system needs to be teased apart to identify those elements adhered to by the community and those also accepted by the wider group from which the community detached itself, the priestly circle who controlled the Jerusalem temple during the fourth, third, 1 Joseph M. Baumgarten, “Sadducean Elements in Qumran Law,” The Community of the Renewed Covenant: The Notre Dame Symposium on the Dead Sea Scrolls (ed. Eugene Ulrich and James C. VanderKam; Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1994), 27–36. The term “Qumran community” is used here to denote the groups whose existence is implied by the sectarian scrolls found in the cave near Khirbet Qumran (The Rule of the Community, Rule of the Blessings, Hodayot, Damas- cus Document, and the pesharim).
    [Show full text]
  • The Attitude Toward Mamzerim in Jewish Society in Late Antiquity Author(S): Meir Bar-Ilan Source: Jewish History, Vol
    The Attitude toward Mamzerim in Jewish Society in Late Antiquity Author(s): Meir Bar-Ilan Source: Jewish History, Vol. 14, No. 2 (2000), pp. 125-170 Published by: Springer Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20101400 Accessed: 18-05-2016 02:48 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. Springer is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Jewish History This content downloaded from 198.91.37.2 on Wed, 18 May 2016 02:48:53 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms ^* Jewish History 14: 125-170,2000. 125 V% ? 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. The attitude toward mamzerim in Jewish society in late antiquity MEIR BAR-ILAN Jewish History Department, Bar-Ilan University, Israel Abstract. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the attitude of the Jewish people to a marginal group in that society: mamzerim, from Biblical times to Late Antiquity. The social exclusion of mamzerim is already stated in Deutoronomy 23:3, though a reading of several later rabbinic and non-rabbinic sources suggests how this exclusion really took place. It is assumed that mamzerim were not accepted into the Qumram sect, just like handi capped persons, and they were not allowed to enter the Temple.
    [Show full text]
  • Kabbalat Shabbat Reuven Meir Haralick
    ,ca ,kce Kabbalat Shabbat Reuven Meir Haralick In Dedication to Reb Shlomo Carlebach i This book was prepared by DavkaWriter. Copyright @2014 by Robert M. Haralick All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsover withougt written permission from Robert M. Haralick except in the case of bried quotations in reviews for inclusion in a magazine, newspaper, or broadcast or brief quotations in books or articles about Jewish Spirituality. ISBN 0-9722273-3-4 ii Reb Shlomo Carlebach If there is one person who in our time has transformed the Kabbalat Shabbat prayer service, it is Reb Shlomo Carlebach. Reb Shlomo introduced a setting for conducting tefilot (prayer services) in an atmosphere of singing and dancing with simcha (joy and happiness). Prayer is not by quick dry mechanical repetition of memorized words and phrases. Reb Carlebach’s prayer was not mechanical. In prayer he stood before God, not just intellectually, but with his whole body and voice. And as he stood before God, those in the congregation felt that they also were standing before God. Reb Carlebach composed uplifting melodies of the soul, melodies that can repeat and repeat, yet never become tiresome. Through his inspiration and the nigun’s he has brought down and given us, the Kabbalat Shabbat Friday night prayer service has become a time during which we transcend and transition into and live the paradise of Shabbos. A person who has gotten used to the Carlebach style of Kabbalat prayer service, never wants to do it any other way.
    [Show full text]
  • Haima in Hebrews
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 2010 Haima in Hebrews Hermann V. Kuma Andrews University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, and the Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Kuma, Hermann V., "Haima in Hebrews" (2010). Dissertations. 80. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/80 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact repository@andrews.edu. Thank you for your interest in the Andrews University Digital Library of Dissertations and Theses. Please honor the copyright of this document by not duplicating or distributing additional copies in any form without the author’s express written permission. Thanks for your cooperation. ABSTRACT ÁÍìá IN HEBREWS by Hermann V. A. Kuma Adviser: Richard M. Davidson ABSTRACT OF GRADUATE STUDENT RESEARCH Dissertation Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary Title: ÁÍìá IN HEBREWS Name of researcher: Hermann V. A. Kuma Name and degree of faculty adviser: Richard M. Davidson, Ph.D. Date completed: January 2010 Problem The focus of the dissertation is the significance of the term áÍìá (“blood”) in the Epistle to the Hebrews and how the author of Hebrews uses the term to formulate the argument and message of the Epistle. The dissertation traces the scholarly blood debate involving blood as life or death which began in the last decade of the nineteenth century and eventually fizzled out in the mid-1950s.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Three Ethical Values in Judaism
    Chapter Three Ethical Values in Judaism 1 3 4 3.1 The History of Israel Judaism Although Judaism does not enjoy a great number of followers in the world, it has greatly been subject to extensive studies and hot discussions for a couple of reasons. To many exegetists, the word “Judaism” derived from “Judah”- south Palestine- is obviously best concerned with the religious and cultural events that happened since the time of Jews’ return from Babylon to Palestine in 538, before the Common Era'. This religion is the oldest one among all Semitic ones, viz. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, sometimes also called Abraham Religions, because they are said to come all form an original patriarch, Abraham. Christianity has the greatest number of adherents across the globe and has been effective on the Western civilization today more than all others. It is believed to be the child of Judaism, as there are many commonalities between the two. That being the case, a large part of the history of Judaism and the totality of its holy book- the Old Testament- has been of great conaem to and revered by Christians and the West alike. Compared to other religions now alive, Judaism has to special attributes; 1. The intense intermingle of ethnicity and religion: They art? so much interblended that it is hard to state from another. Thus, it is scarcely possible to define what ‘Judaism’ is without having an understanding of what it means ‘to be a Jew’. The nation/tribe which sees tljie religion 1 3 5 its own, is the nation of Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Halachic Aspects of Family Planning
    FAMJLY PLANNING 5 Halachic Aspects of Family Planning Rabbi Herschel Schachter In order to be certain that our Journal falls well within the parameters of the halacha, it was decided from the outset that all articles published herein would receive the scrutiny of Gedolei Yisroel. In a discussion last year with one of the outstanding Roshei Yeshiva regarding certain articles for inclusion in the Journal. we were strongly urged by him to print an article on M'niat HaHerayon (Birth Control). Not only did this Codal request this article, but he also specifically requested that it include all Heterim available. His feeling was that it is important for people to have knowledge, so that they will be able to approach their Rov for advice. The Edit.>r Introduction The halacha forbids public lectures on matters of Gilui Arayot, for fear that some of those attending such Drashot will misunderstand the fine points of the law and do forbidden acts thinking that they are permissible.' Many years ago, Rabbi 1. Chagiga llb. Rabbi Herschel Schachter, Rosh Yeshiva and Rosh Hakollel, Yeshiva University • THE JOURNAL OF HAlACHA Feinstein ruled in a responsum2 that the issue of family planning is included under the broad heading of Arayot, and therefore may not be treated in journals available to the public. Nevertheless, over the past twenty years this topic has been dealt with at length in both public forums and popular journals. Its treatment, unfortunately, has been less than satisfactory, with presentations often being incomplete and inaccurate. Several Gedolim felt that a new halachic paper on this subject in English wouJd be appropriate, and it is upon their insistence that this paper is being written.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ceremony of the Red Heifer: Its Purpose and Function in Narrative Context
    Durham E-Theses The Ceremony of the Red Heifer: Its Purpose and Function in Narrative Context HUMANN, JOEL,RICHARD How to cite: HUMANN, JOEL,RICHARD (2011) The Ceremony of the Red Heifer: Its Purpose and Function in Narrative Context , Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/608/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: e-theses.admin@dur.ac.uk Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 The Ceremony of the Red Heifer: Its Purpose and Function in Narrative Context by Joel Humann Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Theology and Religion University of Durham Copyright c 2011 by Joel Humann Abstract The Ceremony of the Red Heifer: Its Purpose and Function in Narrative Context Joel Humann The present thesis is a synchronic investigation of the ceremony of the Red Heifer of Num 19, which describes a purificatory ritual that cleanses persons who have become defiled through contact with the dead.
    [Show full text]