DOCSLIB.ORG

Bridgwater Tidal Barrier Scheme WFD Compliance Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bridgwater Tidal Barrier Scheme WFD Compliance Assessment Bridgwater Tidal Barrier Scheme WFD Compliance Assessment Environmental Statement Appendix 8A November 2019 General description of works and key assumptions Barrier description: 1 The tidal barrier will be a surge barrier (not a tidal exclusion sluice) with a design life of 100 years. During normal conditions it will be fully open and flows will not be impounded in either direction. The tidal barrier will be located at NGR ST302390, the general arrangement of the barrier is provided on Drawing Number ENVIMSW002039-CH2-FBS-T5-DR-C-7020 and the site location plan on Drawing Number ENVIMSW002039-CH2-FDE-T5-DR-LP-7010. The barrier type will be a vertical lift gate. There will be 2 gates, supported by towers on each bank and with one central pier in the channel. Both gates will be operated together except for gate operation checks. The towers will be concrete, 2 supported on mass concrete or piled foundations to 19-27m below ground level. The detailed design of the central pier will minimise its footprint and hydraulic influences. The gates will close on to a concrete cill in the river bed, which will be retained by sheet piles in the bed. Cill flushing (open gates) to clear sediment is expected to be required monthly if the barrier has not operated for flood risk, potentially more 3 frequently during times of the year when sediment loads are high. In addition to the gate closure cill, the river bed will be protected from erosion by a concrete stilling basin extending 13.5m downstream and upstream from the gates. Rock rip-rap will be used to protect the bed for 15m upstream and downstream 4 of the cill and stilling basin. The complete length of built structures along the channel is approximately 60m and this extends across the channel width. A 20m long sheet pile retaining wall with concrete capping beam will extend upstream and downstream from the pier on the left and right hand banks and will tie into the existing flood embankment. Barrier operation - when the barrier first becomes operational: Barrier operation will be triggered by a projected surge tide with a pre-determined height trigger. It would close at low water and remain closed for a maximum of 6 hours during a high tide, re-opening once tidal and fluvial levels either side are equal as the tide ebbs. The frequency of barrier operations when the barrier first becomes operational is anticipated to be as follows: - An average of 1 to 5 barrier closures per year for tidal flood risk management (anticipated maximum of 6 hours duration). - Up to 5 barrier closures per year for testing and training (approx. 4-5 hour duration), timing dependent on previous closures of greater than 4 hours. The main assumption here is that sufficient time is allowed between full closures for testing or 5 training purposes, or between a closure for tidal flood risk management and a full closure for testing or training purposes, to allow for some self-regulation of the channel. A conservative period of 12 weeks is considered to be appropriate until monitoring data is available to refine this estimate. - An average of 12 to 24 barrier closures per year for maintenance purposes (approx. 1 hour duration). It is anticipated that the greatest number of barrier closures are likely to be during the months of February and March. Some of the barrier closures for tidal flood risk management will be over consecutive tides. Analysis of records indicates that this could be for between 2 and 4 consecutive tides and that overall approximately 50% of the barrier closures will occur on consecutive tides. Barrier operation - future (climate change) scenarios: In the future, the frequency of operation for flood risk management is predicted to increase due to sea level rise. As operations for tidal flood risk management increase, the number of barrier closures for maintenance purposes decreases (as maintenance checks can be completed during the flood risk management operations). The frequency of barrier operations by 2055 is anticipated to be as follows: - An average of 2 to 8 barrier closures per year for tidal flood risk management (maximum of 6 hours duration). - Up to 3 barrier closures per year for testing and training (approximately 4-5 hour duration), timing dependent on previous closures of greater than 4 hours. The period between closures will be informed by the monitoring undertaken during the earlier epoch and may be shortened from 12 weeks if it is shown that there is no detrimental impact to the estuary regime. 6 - An average of 10 to 20 barrier closures per year for maintenance purposes (approximately 1 hour duration). The frequency of barrier operations by 2124 is anticipated to be as follows: - An average of 20 to 34 barrier closures per year for tidal flood risk management (maximum of 6 hours duration). - An average of 6 to 12 barrier closures per year for maintenance purposes (approximately 1 hour duration). The number of barrier closures for tidal flood risk management across consecutive tides is anticipated to increase in the future. By 2055, it is anticipated that approximately 67% of barrier closures will be across consecutive tides and this could be for between 2 and 8 consecutive tides. By 2124, it is anticipated that approximately 85% of barrier closures will be across consecutive tides and this could be for up to 9 consecutive tides. Tab 1. WFD Assumptions Fish Passage: An options appraisal has considered the viability of various fish passage design options within the setting of the barrier (APEM, 2018). This found that there was only one possible multi-species design solution, comprising fixed orifices in the barrer gates/structure. All other designs were unviable due to operational, environmental or construction related constraints which could not be overcome. The fixed orifice design was further investigated, and after detailed consideration by the Environment Agency's Fisheries Technical Sub-group (set up for this BTB Scheme) this option was discounted due to low confidence in the effectiveness of this type of measure, as follows: - Environment Agency fisheries technical specialists have noted that it is an untested approach in a tidal situation such as this, and there is concern that the fresh water indicator will not be achieved and therefore will be unattractive to fish. - Environment Agency research into this type of solution/ evidence from other penstock/ orifice installations shows mixed reports on efficiency. - There is concern that the orifice sizing is problematic. The larger the orifices become the greater the potential of increased flood risk upstream and increased leakage. 7 - The Environment Agency operational team have also raised a range of concerns over the operation and maintenance difficulties this solution would present, based on their understanding and experience of working in this challenging estuarine environment, i.e. high turbidity levels/ large tidal ranges, which have the potential to cause high rates of failure/ high maintenance needs and fundamentally health and safety concerns for operatives. The option of providing a single species solution for eels was also discounted for similar reasons. The Environment Agency has instead identified suitable works to improve 12 sites upstream of the barrier where there are existing delays in migration. These improvement works will mitigate for the temporary delays in fish/eel migration when the tidal barrier is closed. The proposed works at these 12 sites have been shown to be WFD compliant; refer Chapter 18 of the Environmental Statement for this scheme. Downstream Flood Defences: The existing downstream flood embankments will continue to be maintained, as a separate project(s), in accordance with the Parrett Estuary Flood Risk Management Strategy (PEFRMS). 8 Raised primary and new secondary flood defences will be built as part of this project to protect local communities around Combwich, Chilton Trinity and Pawlett. The site plan for the downstream defences is provided in Drawing Number 122507- BVL-FEV-SW-DR-C-00017. They will be raised/built landward of the estuary so as not to impact on the intertidal zone. Alignments of the secondary defences have sought to minimise impacts on drainage. Construction: The construction process will involve the following in-channel components over a period of approximately 3 years: - A temporary bypass channel consisting of a 20m wide, 200m long, rectangular cross-section and flow guidance bunds upstream and downstream of the diversion, to bypass flows around the barrier site (approximately half of the capacity of the Parrett). 9 - Rip rap will be placed to provide scour protection through the narrower sections of the bypass channel and in the transition areas (it is assumed that this will include areas in the River Parrett as appropriate). - During reinstatement the river bypass channel will be filled with stockpiled excavated material and the temporary stabilisation / scour protection piles will be removed. It is not known at this stage how the River Parrett banks will be reinstated however, for the purposes of this assessment, it is assumed that this will ensure structural stability, whilst promoting sediment accretion and avoiding hard/soft transitions with adjacent river banks. (For example, reinstated banks to be composed from a mix of both hard (rip-rap) overlain with a soft (e.g. brushwood mattress) engineered solution.) - Construction of jetties and a cofferdam to allow the barrier to be constructed in the dry. Temporary construction impacts: Consideration has been given to permanent impacts of the scheme. Temporary construction impacts are not usually considered to present a risk to WFD compliance due to their temporary nature, however it is acknowledged that working within the 10 estuary bed and banks for four years during construction may cause permanent disturbance of sediment and use of the bypass channel will alter flows which could have a permanent impact on estuary morphology, therefore effects relation to potential permanent effects from these specific construction related issues is included.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Scoping Opinion
    SCOPING OPINION: Proposed A358 Taunton to Southfields Dualling Scheme Case Reference: TR010061 Adopted by the Planning Inspectorate (on behalf of the Secretary of State) pursuant to Regulation 10 of The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 May 2021 [This page has been intentionally left blank] ii Scoping Opinion for Proposed A358 Taunton to Southfields Dualling Scheme CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ 1 1.1 Background .................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Planning Inspectorate’s Consultation............................................. 2 2. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ..................................................... 4 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................... 4 2.2 Description of the Proposed Development ............................................ 4 2.3 The Planning Inspectorate’s Comments ............................................... 6 3. ES APPROACH............................................................................... 9 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................... 9 3.2 Relevant National Policy Statements (NPSs)....................................... 10 3.3 Scope of Assessment ..................................................................... 10 3.4 Coronavirus (COVID-19) Environmental Information and Data Collection 14 3.5 Confidential and Sensitive
    [Show full text]
  • A358 Taunton to Southfields Dualling Scheme
    A358 Taunton to Southfields Dualling Scheme Technical Appraisal Report Updated February 2018 Technical Appraisal Report – List of Amendments The following changes have been made since the version issued in January 2018. Corrections Version Page Paragraph/Table/Figure Comment January 2018 165 Table 8.5 The column “Orange option (via J25A) - Difference (min:sec)” has been reformatted to show times in minutes and seconds. The previous version had been formatted to show percentages in error. January 2018 212 Appendix B2- Shortlisted Junctions had been positioned Options incorrectly, the map has been updated to reflect correct positions. February 2018 206 Paragraph 17.1.1 BCR description changed from good to high. Good was stated in error. A358 Taunton to Southfields Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 1. Introduction 7 1.1. Background to this report 7 1.2. Purpose of the report 7 1.3. Wider context 8 1.4. Scheme overview 10 1.5. Scheme description 11 1.6. Report structure 11 2. Planning Brief 14 2.1. Scheme objectives 14 2.2. Client scheme requirements 14 2.3. Highways England organisational objectives 15 3. Existing conditions 16 3.1. Introduction 16 3.2. Description of the locality 16 3.3. Existing highway network 20 3.4. Traffic data 23 3.5. Accidents and journey time reliability 28 3.6. Topography, land use, property and industry 32 3.7. Climate 33 3.8. Drainage 35 3.9. Geology 36 3.10. Mining 38 3.11. Public utilities 38 3.12. Environment 41 3.13. Accessibility 45 3.14. Integration 46 3.15.
    [Show full text]
  • Taunton Deane Landscape Character Assessment – Report 1 Taunton Deane Landscape Character Assessment
    Taunton Deane Landscape Character Assessment – Report 1 Taunton Deane Landscape Character Assessment Introduction....................................................................................................................................... 3 Background and Context ...................................................................................................3 Landscape Character Assessment ................................................................................................. 8 Landscape Type 1: Farmed and Settled Low Vale....................................................................... 25 Character Area 1A: Vale of Taunton Deane ....................................................................25 Landscape Type 2: River Floodplain ............................................................................................ 37 Character Area 2A: The Tone..........................................................................................37 Landscape Type 3: Farmed and Settled High Vale...................................................................... 45 Character Area 3A: Quantock Fringes and West Vale.....................................................46 Character Area 3B: Blackdown Fringes ...........................................................................47 Landscape Type 4: Farmed and Wooded Lias Vale .................................................................... 55 Character Area 4A: Fivehead Vale ..................................................................................55
    [Show full text]
  • Land at Fivehead Near Taunton, Somerset
    Land at Fivehead Near Taunton, Somerset Land at Fivehead For Sale by Informal Tender Tenders Close at 12 noon on Near Taunton, Somerset Wednesday 7th February 2018 Most useful and productive arable and pasture land all with gated road access at 12 noon In all about 39.82 Acres (16.11 Hectares) available in three separate Lots Guide Price Lot 1 £95,000 Lot 2 £80,000 Lot 3 £120,000 DESCRIPTION TENURE This sale provides purchasers with an opportunity to acquire productive agricultural land in an easily accessible The land is of freehold tenure with vacant possession available upon completion of the purchase. Inlocation, all about all lots having 24.16 good Acres road frontage (9.78, located hectares) close to the village of Fivehead. SERVICES We understand that the majority of the land is classified as being Grade III quality on the Agricultural Land It is understood that all Lots benefit from a natural rhyne or river water supply (purchasers are to rely on their Classifications Map. own enquiries in this respect). LOT 1 – 12.02 Acres (4.86 Hectares) of Pasture/Arable land (shown shaded green on the attached plan) BASIC PAYMENT SCHEME ForLot 1 isSale a single by parcel Tender. of level arable land bound by natural hedgerows with access from the road. It is understood that the land is registered on the Rural Land Register. Entitlements to match those claimed by The land is shown shaded green on the accompanying plan and may be further described as follows the vendor in respect of each Lot will be transferred to the respective purchaser who will only be responsible for the cost of the transfer.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Management Plan Template
    A358 Taunton to Southfields Minutes Scheme A358 – Taunton to Southfields Dualling Scheme – Title: Community Forum 3 18:00 – Date: 23 June 2021 Time: Location: Microsoft Teams 20:35 Independent Chair Highways England Somerset County Council South Somerset District Council Somerset West and Taunton Council Office of Rebecca Pow MP Neroche Parish Council West Hatch Parish Council Hatch Beauchamp Parish Council Ruishton, Thornfalcon and Henlade Parish Council Horton Parish Council Creech St Michael Attendees: Ashill Parish Council North Curry Parish Council Beercrocombe Parish Council West Monkton Parish Council Trull Parish Council Buckland St Mary Parish Council Taunton Area Cycling Campaign South Somerset Bridleways Association Taunton Deane Bridleways Association National Farmers Union Broadway Parish Council Stoke St Mary Parish Council Somerset County Scouts Blackdown District Scouts British Horse Society Chair: Independent Chair Circulation: Those present. No. Item Actions Page 1 of 15 A358 Taunton to Southfields Minutes Scheme 1. Introduction The new Independent Chair introduced themself to members of the Community Forum before running through the agenda and housekeeping rules. It was noted that proposals had been submitted to Highways England by a group of 8 Parish Councils and the Chair thanked members of the group for agreeing to speak about these at the Forum. Forum members were advised that the slides would be circulated after the meeting and a A list of organisations attending the Forum would also be shared. The Chair invited Highways England to lead the safety moment for the meeting, which focussed on the importance of checking tyres before going on long journeys. 2. Progress so far Highways England provided an overview of the engagement that had taken place through formal channels since March 2021 – including the Community Forums, Walking, Cycling and Horse Riding (including disabled users) forum and stakeholder meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • A358 Taunton to Southfields Dualling Scheme
    A358 Taunton to Southfields Dualling Scheme Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report - Volume 1: Main Report HE551508-ARP-EGN-ZZ-RP-LE-000001 23/03/21 A358 Taunton to Southfields Dualling Scheme | HE551508 Highways England Table of contents Pages 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of the report 1 1.2 Overview of the proposed scheme 2 1.3 Legislative context and the need for environmental impact assessment 3 1.4 Planning policy context 3 2 The proposed scheme 5 2.1 Need for the proposed scheme 5 2.2 Proposed Scheme objectives 6 2.3 Proposed Scheme location 7 2.4 Proposed scheme description 10 2.5 Construction 18 3 Assessment of alternatives 21 3.1 Assessment methodology 21 3.2 Stages 0 and 1 options appraised 22 3.3 Stage 2 Further assessment of selected options 24 4 Consultation 32 4.1 Consultation undertaken to date 32 4.2 Proposed consultation 33 5 Environmental assessment methodology 35 5.1 Approach to aspects of EIA regulations 35 5.2 Surveys and predictive techniques and methods 39 5.3 General assessment assumptions and limitations 41 5.4 Mitigation and enhancement 41 5.5 Significance criteria 42 5.6 Cumulative effects 43 5.7 Supporting assessments 44 5.8 Environmental Statement 45 6 Air quality 47 6.1 NPSNN requirements 47 6.2 Study area 48 6.3 Baseline conditions 49 6.4 Potential impacts 52 6.5 Design, mitigation and enhancement measures 54 6.6 Description of the likely significant effects 54 6.7 Assessment methodology 56 6.8 Assessment assumptions and limitations 62 A358 Taunton to Southfields Dualling Scheme | HE551508 Highways
    [Show full text]
  • JOINT LEVEL 1 STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT July 2019
    Somerset West & Taunton and South Somerset Councils JOINT LEVEL 1 STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT July 2019 70049028 JULY 2019 PUBLIC Somerset West & Taunton and South Somerset Councils JOINT LEVEL 1 STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT July 2019 CONSULTATION DRAFT - PUBLIC PROJECT NO. 70049028 OUR REF. NO. 70049028 DATE: JULY 2019 PUBLIC Somerset West & Taunton and South Somerset Councils JOINT LEVEL 1 STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT July 2019 WSP Kings Orchard 1 Queen Street Bristol BS2 0HQ Phone: +44 117 930 6200 WSP.com PUBLIC QUALITY CONTROL Issue/revision First issue Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Remarks Consultation Draft Final Issue Date 05/04/2019 16/07/2019 Prepared by Sarah Doug Barker Stonehouse, Simon Olivier Signature Checked by Doug Barker Doug Barker Signature Authorised by Rachel Bird Rachel Bird Signature Project number 70049028 70049028 Report number 70049028_001 70049028_Final File reference - - Joint Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk assessment PUBLIC | WSP Project No.: 70049028 July 2019 Somerset West & Taunton and South Somerset Councils CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ABBREVIATIONS 1 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW 1 1.2 SFRA OBJECTIVES 2 1.3 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT 2 1.4 FLOOD RISK SOURCES 2 1.5 STRUCTURE OF THE SFRA 3 2 STUDY AREA 5 2.1 THE STUDY AREA 5 2.2 LAND USE AND PEOPLE 7 2.3 TOPOGRAPHY 7 2.4 GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY 10 2.5 WATERCOURSES AND CATCHMENTS 13 2.6 TIDAL AND COASTAL AREAS 19 3 POLICY AND STRATEGY CONTEXT 20 3.1 NATIONAL POLICY 20 3.2 REGIONAL POLICY AND STRATEGY 27 3.3 LOCAL POLICY 38 3.4 SUSTAINABLE
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 11 – Protected Areas
    River Basin Management Plan South West River Basin District Annex D: Protected area objectives Contents D.1 Introduction 2 D.2 Types and location of protected areas 3 D.3 Monitoring network 12 D.4 Objectives 19 D.5 Compliance (results of monitoring) including 22 actions (measures) for Surface Water Drinking Water Protected Areas and Natura 2000 Protected Areas D.6 Other information 152 D.1 Introduction The Water Framework Directive specifies that areas requiring special protection under other EC Directives and waters used for the abstraction of drinking water are identified as protected areas. These areas have their own objectives and standards. Article 4 of the Water Framework Directive requires Member States to achieve compliance with the standards and objectives set for each protected area by 22 December 2015, unless otherwise specified in the Community legislation under which the protected area was established. Some areas may require special protection under more than one EC Directive or may have additional (surface water and/or groundwater) objectives. In these cases, all the objectives and standards must be met. Article 6 requires Member States to establish a register of protected areas. The types of protected areas that must be included in the register are: • areas designated for the abstraction of water for human consumption (Drinking Water Protected Areas); • areas designated for the protection of economically significant aquatic species (Freshwater Fish and Shellfish); • bodies of water designated as recreational waters, including areas designated as Bathing Waters; • nutrient-sensitive areas, including areas identified as Nitrate Vulnerable Zones under the Nitrates Directive or areas designated as sensitive under Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive (UWWTD); • areas designated for the protection of habitats or species where the maintenance or improvement of the status of water is an important factor in their protection including relevant Natura 2000 sites1.
    [Show full text]
  • Display PDF in Separate
    S O L c f c h V J e s t B o x 1 3 Environment Agency E n v i r o n m e n t A g e n c y South West Region Environment Protection 1997 EC Directive Compliance Report ■ August 1998 Compiled By: Dean Levy Technical Assistant (Quality Assessment) Water Quality Technical Series QA 98/01 M G Booth Regional Environment Protection Manager ENVIRONMENT AGENCY - SOUTH WEST REGION 1997 EC Directive Compliance Report This report is a compilation of the Head Office returns for compliance with EC Directives in 1997. The report highlights sites which were non-comp!iant in 1997 and includes a progress update on investigations at sites which failed in 1996. In addition historic compliance for each Directive is included for reference purposes. It is intended that the report should be used by Area and Regional staff in discussions of requirements for investigations into non-compliance. The report is also intended to highlight consenting issues for discussion, particularly regarding Dangerous Substances. CONTENTS Section Page 1 EC BATHING WATERS DIRECTIVE 5 1.) 1997 EC Bathing Waters Directive Compliance 6 1.1.1 1997 Compliance With Mandatory Coliform Standards 1.1.2 1997 Compliance With Guideline Coliform And Streptococci Standards 7 1.1.3 Reasons For Failure of Mandatory Standards At South West Bathing Waters During 1997 8 1.1.4 Summary Of Non-Compliance Against Guideline Microbiological Standards 14 1.2 Historic Bathing Waters Compliance (Mandatory Standards) 19 EC DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES DIRECTIVE LIST I 27 2.1 1997 EC Dangerous Substances Directive List
    [Show full text]
  • Local Environment Agency Plan
    local environment agency plan RIVER PARRETT CONSULTATION REPORT MARCH 1997 'f ■ ■ j En v i r o n m e n t A g e n c y En v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE HEAD OFFICE Rio House. Waterside Drive. Aziec West. Almondsbury. Bristol BS32 4UD O k FOREWORD This Plan represents a significant step forward in environmental thinking. It has been clear for many years that the problems of land, air and water, particularly in the realm of pollution control, cannot be adequately addressed individually. They are interdependent, each affecting the others. The Government’s answer was to create the Environment Agency with the umbrella responsibility for all three. The role and duties of the Agency are set out in this document. This holistic approach is now reflected in this Plan. It is a logical development of the Catchment Management Plans prepared by the old National Rivers Authority, now subsumed into the new Agency. It sets out the environmental problems of the area in a way which has not been done before,' and suggests the most important issues which should now be addressed. It is, I believe, vital reading for everyone concerned with the future of North Wessex. The catchment of the River Parrett and its tributaries, the Rivers Isle, Yeo, and Cary encompasses a varied and complex environment, which includes a major part o f the important Somerset Levels and Moors. This is the first Local Environment Agency Plan (LEAP) produced in North Wessex Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Land at Fivehead Taunton, Somerset
    Land at Fivehead Taunton, Somerset Land at Fivehead, Taunton, Somerset For Sale by Informal Tender Guide price Lot 1: Excess of £400,000 Tenders Close on Tuesday 28 July 2015 Lot 2: Excess of £300,000 Lot 3: Excess of £450,000 at 12 noon Three highly productive and versatile parcels of arable and pasture land situated within a renowned farming district between Taunton and Langport In all about 151.17 Acres (61.19 Hectares) DESCRIPTION This important sale presents purchasers with an outstanding opportunity to acquire excellent blocks of extremely useful commercial farmland within a prominent and Inrenowned all about farming 24.16 district Acres on the(9.78 outskirts hectares) of the village of Fivehead. The land is understood to be classified as being Grade 3 quality having been utilised in recent years to support a very well run beef suckler cow and arable enterprise. The land comprises 3 parcels, all of which have good access, and with each parcel divided into excellent enclosures which are generally level, of good size and bounded Forby natural Sale hedgerows.by Tender. The land has been managed on a rotational basis, is well presented and in the Agents’ opinion offers first class opportunities to all farmers and land owners. The lots may be more particularly described as follows: TendersLOT 1 – 51.04 closing Acres on (20.52 Tuesday Ha) of 1st Arable October Land 2013 at 12 noon. LOT 2 – Est. 39.22 Acres (15.88 Ha) of Arable and Pasture Land Situated to the west of Stowey Lane, Fivehead, this is an attractive parcel of This parcel of land has access off a council maintained road to the north and is arable land though several of the enclosures are currently down to temporary bounded by the Fivehead River to the south.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Level 1 Sfra Final Revised
    Somerset West & Taunton and South Somerset Councils July 2019 70049028 JULY 2019 PUBLIC Somerset West & Taunton and South Somerset Councils JOINT LEVEL 1 STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT July 2019 FINAL ISSUE - PUBLIC PROJECT NO. 70049028 OUR REF. NO. 70049028 DATE: JULY 2019 PUBLIC Somerset West & Taunton and South Somerset Councils July 2019 WSP Kings Orchard 1 Queen Street Bristol BS2 0HQ Phone: +44 117 930 6200 WSP.com PUBLIC QUALITY CONTROL Issue/revision First issue Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Remarks Consultation Draft Final Issue Date 05/04/2019 16/07/2019 Prepared by Sarah Doug Barker Stonehouse, Simon Olivier Signature Checked by Doug Barker Doug Barker Signature Authorised by Rachel Bird Rachel Bird Signature Project number 70049028 70049028 Report number 70049028_001 70049028_Final File reference - - Joint Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk assessment PUBLIC | WSP Project No.: 70049028 July 2019 Somerset West & Taunton and South Somerset Councils CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Joint Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk assessment PUBLIC | WSP Project No.: 70049028 July 2019 Somerset West & Taunton and South Somerset Councils Joint Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk assessment PUBLIC | WSP Project No.: 70049028 July 2019 Somerset West & Taunton and South Somerset Councils TABLES Table 1 - Abbreviations 1 Table 1-1 Structure of the SFRA 3 Table 2-1 - West Somerset main watercourses draining to the northern coast 13 Table 2-2 - Main watercourses within Taunton Deane 14 Table 2-3 Main tributaries of the River Parrett within South Somerset. 17 Table
    [Show full text]