Societies 2013, 3, 186–203; doi:10.3390/soc3020186 OPEN ACCESS societies ISSN 2075-4698 www.mdpi.com/journal/societies Article Between Critical and Uncritical Understandings: A Case Study Analyzing the Claims of Islamophobia Made in the Context of the Proposed ‘Super-Mosque’ in Dudley, England Chris Allen Institute of Applied Social Sciences, University of Birmingham, Muirhead Tower, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK; E-Mail:
[email protected]; Tel.: +44-121-414-2703 Received: 5 February 2013; in revised form: 24 April 2013 / Accepted: 24 April 2013 / Published: 29 April 2013 Abstract: Research highlights how usage and claims of Islamophobia tend to be simplistic and without nuance. Using a case study approach, this article considers the claims of Islamophobia made in relation to the proposed Dudley ‗super-mosque‘. Setting out a narrative of the ‗super-mosque‘, this article draws upon primary and secondary research to consider the claims and discourses of the major actors in the Dudley setting: the Dudley Muslim Association, Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council, the far-right especially the British National Party and the English Defence League, as well as individual political figures. Considering each in detail, this article seeks to evaluate the extent to which each of the actors and the claims of Islamophobia made against them might be valid. As well as exploring claims of Islamophobia within a ‗real‘ environment, this article seeks to critically engage the opposition shown towards the mosque, the way in which the opposition campaigns were mobilized and engineered, and how the ideological meanings of Islamophobia was able to be readily utilized to validate and justify such opposition.