DOCSLIB.ORG

1622-Humber Consult Doc.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1622-Humber Consult Doc.Indd The Humber Flood Risk Management Strategy Consultation Document August 2005 planning for the rising tides Key issues Strategy objectives Key issues affecting the Sea level rise Impact of realigning defences Overall objectives Sea levels in the estuary are Maintaining or moving defences 1. To develop a coherent and • sustainable, taking into 2. To ensure that all proposals are: need for and scope of a expected to rise relative to the land in the middle or outer parts of the realistic plan for the estuary’s account future changes in the • compatible with natural estuary at an average rate of 6 mm per year estuary (seaward of the Humber flood defences that is: environment (human, built or strategy include: processes; over the next 50 years (and possibly Bridge) will have little effect on natural), in sea levels or in the • compatible with natural estuary at a higher rate subsequently). overall estuary processes or on the climate. • technically feasible; Condition and standard of processes; defences elsewhere, however doing defences Loss of inter-tidal habitat • economically viable; so further landward could affect • compatible with adjacent Although the existing defences are As sea levels rise the presence of water levels. developments, including • environmentally appropriate; and in reasonable condition and provide a system of defences around the preferred options for adjoining an adequate standard of protection, estuary will result in the loss of Creating flood storage • socially acceptable. lengths of frontage; and both the condition and the standard about 600 ha of inter-tidal habitat Creating flood storage landward will reduce with time through due to coastal squeeze. of the Humber Bridge, either by natural deterioration and because moving the defences or by allowing Habitats Regulations Detailed Objectives of estuary processes, including the sections to overtop during extreme The SPA/SAC designations within rise in sea levels. events, will lower flood levels and the estuary mean that, to comply To maintain and, where possible, To protect people and their property from the adverse effects (physical and so reduce flood risk nearby. This enhance public safety, health and psychological) of flooding Assets protected with the obligations imposed by the may allow us to delay works that are security The defences protect large numbers Habitats Regulations*, where we intended to improve standards of of people and major concentrations cannot say that there won’t be any To respond to natural processes and To ensure proposals do not have adverse effects on wider estuarine processes protection. Suitable flood storage to avoid contamination and erosion of residential, industrial and loss of inter-tidal habitat resulting sites can only be identified and To ensure that ‘contaminated sites’ are prevented from having an adverse effect commercial property together from a decision to continue on the estuary their benefits assessed through a with nationally important port managing the defences (whether strategic approach. To protect and, where possible, To protect high quality agricultural land from flooding infrastructure and extensive areas due to coastal squeeze or to repair provide opportunities for economic of highly productive and versatile or improvement works) we will need * The Conservation (Natural development and employment To protect areas of employment from the adverse effects of flooding and agricultural land. to provide compensatory habitat as Habitats etc) Regulations 1994 (including protection of existing land provide a secure environment for economic activity and development close to the location of the loss as uses where appropriate) Justification for works possible. Nevertheless there are significant To protect existing transport To ensure there are no adverse effects on navigation (e.g. on channels, infrastructure (land and sea) deepwater docks and beacons etc) areas of the tidal floodplain that Strategic realignment of defences contain relatively small numbers Realigning the defences at selected To prevent adverse impacts of flooding on road and rail infrastructure of people and few properties and sites is the only way of providing To protect and, where possible, To minimise adverse effects on the European site and ensure direct losses are where, as a result, it will be difficult this replacement habitat within enhance flora and fauna compensated to justify the cost of repairing or the estuary and appropriate sites (biodiversity) improving the defences. can only be identified through an To address the adverse effects of ‘coastal squeeze’ on the European site estuary-wide (strategic) approach. To protect the historic environment To minimise adverse effects on undiscovered or buried archaeology To protect designated archaeological and historic features within the floodplain To protect and where possible To ensure that characteristic and valuable landscapes are protected and enhance landscape, amenity and enhanced and that recreational/amenity features are protected and promoted recreational values where possible 2 Environment Agency The Humber Flood Risk Management Strategy Environment Agency The Humber Flood Risk Management Strategy 3 Introduction In 1997 we began to develop a co-ordinated approach to managing the flood defences surrounding the Humber Estuary and the lower reaches of its main tributaries, the Yorkshire Ouse and the Trent. This led to the publication, in September 2000, of the Humber Estuary Shoreline Management Plan (HESMP), which defined the problem, identified the key issues, reviewed the options available and set out overall flood defence policies. It was based on a sound understanding of the physical processes taking place within the estuary and took into account the resulting economic, environmental and Contents social impacts. Key issues 2 4. — What happens next 24 The HESMP indicated that Strategy objectives 3 Approving the strategy 24 a major programme of Introduction 5 Strategic Environmental Assessment 26 improvement works would be Sustainability Appraisal 26 needed to counter the effects 1. — Why a strategy is needed 6 Flood risk management 27 of sea level rise and to ensure Land use and development 6 Other issues to be addressed 27 that appropriate standards of Flood defence and defence standards 7 protection are maintained. It also Estuary processes and future changes 8 5. — Proposals for each management unit 28 pointed out that in some places Natural and historic environment 10 Unit 1 Easington to Paull 28 the defences will need to be Managing coastal habitats 10 Unit 2 Paull to North Ferriby 30 realigned, either to make them Managing flood risk 10 Unit 3 North Ferriby to Weighton Lock 32 more sustainable or to counter Unit 4a Weighton Lock to Boothferry Bridge 34 the effects of sea level rise, and 2. — Developing the strategy 12 Unit 4b Boothferry Bridge to Dutch River 36 supported the creation of new Objectives 12 Units 4c and 4d Dutch River to Keadby Bridge 38 inter-tidal habitat to maintain the The development process 12 Unit 4e Keadby Bridge to Whitton 40 estuary’s conservation status. Consultations 14 Unit 5 Whitton to South Ferriby Cliff 42 Principal findings 14 Unit 6 Barton Cliff to East Halton Skitter 44 Since the HESMP was published the implications of sea level Unit 7 East Halton Skitter to Cleethorpes 46 the next 50 years. The works rise and compliance with the If you have any comments or 3. — The Humber flood risk management strategy 16 Unit 8 Cleethorpes to Saltfleet Haven 48 for the next 5 years have been Habitats Regulations have been suggestions about the strategy Overall strategy 16 assessed in greater detail. Replacing lost habitat (managed realignment) 18 Studies undertaken and supporting reports 50 clarified and a set of sites that or about any aspects of the Flood storage (managed realignment 19 Names, organisations and abbreviations 52 will meet the various realignment The need for a strategy and works to be carried out during and differential standards) Consultations and contact arrangements 54 needs over the next 50 years the way in which it has been the next five years please Low standards of protection 20 has been identified. A long-term developed are set out in Sections respond as suggested inside Work planned for the next 15 years 20 programme of the works needed 1 and 2 of this document. Section the back cover. to manage the defences over the 3 describes the strategy itself same period has been drawn and the works to be carried up. We have reviewed plans for out during the next 15 years the next 15 years and confirmed while Section 4 states what will priorities. Using this information happen next. Section 5 sets out we have developed our broad the implications for each of the framework for managing the compartments into which the estuary’s defences into a floodplain has been divided for comprehensive strategy covering management purposes. 4 Environment Agency The Humber Flood Risk Management Strategy Environment Agency The Humber Flood Risk Management Strategy 5 Section 1 why have a strategy? Land use and development Killingholme, Immingham and Development Frameworks. Flood defences and defence which can cause soft defences to in reasonable condition and provide Grimsby, near Hull and at Goole The Yorkshire and Humber be washed out and fail if too large an adequate standard of protection The estuary’s defences protect standards and Flixborough. These include Assembly’s Regional Economic a volume of water washes over the this is not the case everywhere, as nearly 90,000 ha of land from power stations generating much Strategy indicates that the The floodplain is protected from crest. Defences may fail for other flooding, about 85% of which is shown on the maps on the next of the country’s electricity, flooding by a mixture of soft and hard farmed and is among the best estuary, its assets and its reasons as well, such as undermining page. Repairs are needed in some refineries producing much of its tidal defences with a total length of and most productive agricultural hinterland are integral to the due to erosion of the foreshore or a places while elsewhere works are about 235 km.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • U DDBA Papers of the Barnards Family 1401-1945 of South Cave
    Hull History Centre: Papers of the Barnards Family of South Cave U DDBA Papers of the Barnards Family 1401-1945 of South Cave Historical background: The papers relate to the branch of the family headed by Leuyns Boldero Barnard who began building up a landed estate centred on South Cave in the mid-eighteenth century. His inherited ancestry can be traced back to William and Elizabeth Barnard in the late sixteenth century. Their son, William Barnard, became mayor of Hull and died in 1614. Of his seven sons, two of them also served time as mayor of Hull, including the sixth son, Henry Barnard (d.1661), through whose direct descendants Leuyns Boldero Barnard was eventually destined to succeed. Henry Barnard, married Frances Spurrier and together had a son and a daughter. His daughter, Frances, married William Thompson MP of Humbleton and his son, Edward Barnard, who lived at North Dalton, was recorder of Hull and Beverley from the early 1660s until 1686 when he died. He and his wife Margaret, who was also from the Thompson family, had at least seven children, the eldest of whom, Edward Barnard (d.1714), had five children some of whom died without issue and some had only female heirs. The second son, William Barnard (d.1718) married Mary Perrot, the daughter of a York alderman, but had no children. The third son, Henry Barnard (will at U DDBA/14/3), married Eleanor Lowther, but he also died, in 1769 at the age of 94, without issue. From the death of Henry Barnard in 1769 the family inheritance moved laterally.
    [Show full text]
  • Acrobat Distiller, Job 2
    5. Amphibians and reptiles Common toad Bufo bufo Key Sites: Saltfleetby - Theddlethorpe NNR (TF 470 910). Summary Status: • Wildlife and Countryside Act: Schedule 5, Section 9 (5). • Habitats Directive: not listed. • Berne Convention: not listed. • Red Data Book: not listed. • Breeding Status in the Humber: Breeding. • Widespread and common or abundant. Description The common toad Bufo bufo is a widespread amphibian found throughout Britain although this species is absent from Ireland. They are generally brown, grey or dirty green and have the ability to lighten or darken their skin depending on environmental conditions. Their skin is covered in warts which secrete a toxic substance when the toad is seriously threatened. Like most toad species the common toad has short stubby legs. It therefore moves in a series of short hops rather than the large leaps taken by the common frog (Beebee & Griffiths 2000). The common toad tends to avoid grazed pasture, improved grassland, arable fields, heathland and moorlands in favour of rough grassland, scrub and open woodland. Large permanent water bodies with a good cover of emergent and submerged vegetation are preferred. Unlike other British amphibian species, they are able to inhabit ponds, which support fish, due to the unpalatability of common toad tadpoles (Beebee & Griffiths 2000). Common toads feed primarily on ground dwelling arthropods such as ants (family Formicidae), beetles (order Coleoptera), spiders (order Araneae) and earwigs (order Dermaptera), although slower moving items such as earthworms (Class Oligochaeta), and gastropods such as slugs and snails are also taken (Gittins 1987 in Beebee & Griffiths 2000). Distribution within the Humber As in many kinds of species survey, the observed distribution of records will reflect differences in recording effort as well as the real distribution of a species.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1 Rea Ch Classifica Tion
    RIVER QUALITY SURVEY NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY NORTHUMBRIA & YORKSHIRE REGION GQA ASSESSMENT 1994 PART 1 REA CH CLASSIFICA TION FRESHWATER RIVERS AND CANALS VERSION 1: AUGUST 1995 GQA ASSESSMENT 1994 \ NORTHUMBRIA & YORKSHIRE REGION To allow the development of a National method of evaluating water quality, the rivers in all the NRA regions of England and Wales have been divided into reaches, which are numbered using a coding system based on the hydrological reference for each river basin. Each classified reach then has a chemistry sample point assigned to it and these sample points are regularly monitored for Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Dissolved oxygen (DO) and Total Ammonia. The summary statistics calculated from the results of this sampling are sent to a National Centre where the GQA Grades are calculated. A National report is produced and each region can then produce more detailed reports on the quality of their own rivers. For Northumbria and Yorkshire Region, this Regional Report has been divided into two parts. PARTI: REACH CLASSIFICATION This report contains a listing of the river reaches within the region, with their start and finish grid reference, approximate length, and the 1990 and 1994 GQA class for each reach. The reference code of the chemistry sample point used to classify the reach is also included. A sample point may classify several reaches if there are no major discharges or tributaries dividing those reaches. The sample point used to classify a reach may change and the classification is therefore calculated using the summary statistics for each sample point that has been used over the past three years.
    [Show full text]
  • Humber Estuary Is a Major Task for the Environment Agency, Which Has a Duty
    h u m b e r ESTUARY STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1998 j H umM ‘■UUBEK I*"** E n v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y foreword Management of the Humber Estuary is a major task for the Environment Agency, which has a duty to work towards sustainable management of land, air and water. The Humber Estuary presents one of the greatest challenges in this country in maintaining the balance between economic development and environment protection. Alongside nationally important industries and ports, the Estuary is also internationally important for the birds it supports during their migrations. In addition, flood defences protect 500 000 people and very large tracts of productive farmland from flooding by the sea. Good management of any environment depends upon a sound understanding of that environment, the pressures placed upon it and the interactions of its various components: good management decisions must be based on good science. How to use this report This report summarises the state of the Humber environment by addressing the following questions. PRESSURE • Are there any environmental causes for concern and any problems predicted in the near future? ^W hat are the problems?^ STATE • W hat is the state of the water, air, land and ecology in the Humber area, and has it improved or deteriorated over time? ^ W h a t's it lik e ?^ RESPONSE • What are the priorities for action and investment in the future? ^W hat can be done about it?^ There is a vast amount of data available on the Humber environment that has been used to produce this summary.
    [Show full text]
  • Boaters' Guides
    PDF download Boaters' Guides Welcome Dimension data Key to facilities Welcome to waterscape.com's Boaters' British Waterways' waterway dimension Winding hole (length specified) Guides. data is currently being updated. The These guides list facilities across the waterway following information is for general Winding hole (full length) network. This first release of the guides covers guidance purposes. Queries should be directed to BW's customer service centre the facilities provided by British Waterways on Visitor mooring its navigations in England and Wales. on 0845 671 5530 or email [email protected] The guides are completely Information and office computer-generated. All the information is held in a central database. Whenever you Dock and/or slipway download a guide from waterscape.com, it will take the very latest information and compile a Slipway only 'fresh' PDF for you. The same information is used in the maps on Services and facilities waterscape.com itself, to ensure consistency. It will be regularly updated by local staff Water point only whenever details change. We would like to hear your comments and corrections on the information contained within. Please send your feedback to [email protected]. Downloaded from waterscape.com on 06 May 2010 1 River Ure, Ripon Canal Dishforth 1 Cundall Max 57ft Copt Hewick 2 Rhodesfield Lock Bell Furrows Lock Nicholsons Bridge Ripon Brafferton Rentons Bridge 3 Oxclose Lock 4 Start of Ripon Canal Westwick Lock Milby Lock Bishop Monkton Boroughbridge Myton on Swale Myton Monkton Roecliffe Aldborough Aldwark Marton le Moor Stainley Burton Leonard Aldlwark South Stainley Copgrove Marton Ouseburn Nidd Staveley Great Ouseburn Ouse Gill Beck Ferrensby Little Ouseburn Navigation notes Visitor moorings Ripon Canal Ripon Canal Length 57ft (17.3m).
    [Show full text]
  • Verification of Vulnerable Zones Identified Under the Nitrate Directive \ and Sensitive Areas Identified Under the Urban Waste W
    FINAL REPORT European Commission Directorate General XI Verification of Vulnerable Zones Identified Under the Nitrate Directive and Sensitive Areas Identified Under the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive United Kingdom March 1999 Environmental Resources Management 8 Cavendish Square, London W1M 0ER Telephone 0171 465 7200 Facsimile 0171 465 7272 Email [email protected] http://www.ermuk.com FINAL REPORT European Commission Directorate General XI Verification of Vulnerable Zones Identified Under the Nitrate Directive and Sensitive Areas Identified Under the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive United Kingdom March 1999 Reference 5004 For and on behalf of Environmental Resources Management Approved by: __________________________ Signed: ________________________________ Position: _______________________________ Date: __________________________________ This report has been prepared by Environmental Resources Management the trading name of Environmental Resources Management Limited, with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the client, incorporating our General Terms and Conditions of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to it by agreement with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above. This report is confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party relies on the report at their own
    [Show full text]
  • RIVER TRENT and the TRENT and MERSEY CANAL
    RIVER TRENT and the TRENT AND MERSEY CANAL The River Trent rises near Biddulph Moor in Staffordshire and flows through that county and the counties of Derbyshire, Leicestershire, Nottinghamshire, Lincolnshire and finally, after 168 miles, Humberside. It ends at Trent Falls and its confluence with the Rivers Ouse and Humber. The Trent is our third longest river. Its principal tributaries being; the rivers Sow, Tame, Dove, Derwent, Erewash, Soar and Idle, all of which are canoeable. The River Trent is known to be practicable from Trentham Park, except in dry spells, but the usual starting place for "the 100 mile" is either from Stone on the Trent or Penkridge on the River Penk, then into the River Sow joining the Trent at Haywood. The Trent and Mersey Canal runs parallel for much of its length, and provides an alternative route. River Grading: 1 - 2 Water Authorities: River Trent - Severn-Trent Canal - B.W.B. A B.W.B. licence (free to BCU members) is needed for both river and canal Ordnance Survey Sheet No. 127, Landranger Series. River - Miles from Trentham Park Canal - Miles to Derwent Mouth 0 Trentham Park 50 Meaford Lock Flight 1.5 Strongford Bridge A34 2.75 Road Bridge 48 Stone Lock Flight 5.75 Meaford Bridge A34 7 Stone Bypass Bridge A34, followed by railway bridge 7.75 Walton Bridge Stafford/Stone Canoe Club, PH & Shops 9.5 Aston Bridge 46.5 Aston Lock 44.5 Sandon Lock 13.25 Sandon Bridge 13.75 Concrete Cill on left channel, use right 14.5 Casey Bridge, salt 16 Weston Road Bridge, shallows 42.5 Weston Lock 17.25 Road Bridge 18.5 Road Bridge with Weir under, inspect 19.25 Hoomill Bridge 20 Staffs & Worcs.
    [Show full text]
  • Completed Her Doctoral Thesis (‘Blessings for Nature in the English Liturgy, C.900–1200’) in 2010
    the agricultural history review a journal of agricultural and rural history Volume 64, Part I 2016 Agricultural History Review Volume 64 Part I 2016 contents CONTENTS Notes on contributors iii Forthcoming conferences iv Intensive rabbit production in London and nearby counties malcolm thick 1 in the sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth centuries: an alternative to alternative agriculture? Dutch investors and the drainage of Hatfield Chase, piet va n 17 1626 to 1656 cruyningen The Corbetts are ‘victorious over all’: agricultural implement tamsin bapty 38 making in Shropshire, c.1860 to 1914 A neglected innovation: the double-furrow plough in heather holmes 54 Scotland, its early adoption and use, 1867 to 1880 The Cinderella of the cattle industry: the state and settler godfrey hove 81 commercial dairy farming in Southern Rhodesia, and sandra swart c.1908 to 1937 Annual list of publications on agrarian history, 2014 peter mcshane 103 Book Reviews Gerry Barnes and Tom Williamson, Rethinking ancient m. jane bunting 117 woodland: the archaeology and history of woods in Norfolk Peter Foden and Norton Community Archaeology Group, miriam muller 118 Records of the Manor of Norton in the Liberty of St Albans, 1244–1539 Vandra Costello, Irish demesne landscapes, 1660–1740 david a. fleming 119 ii agricultural history review Alan Fox (ed.), Parish government in a Leicestershire village: brodie waddell 120 The Buckminster Town Book, 1655–1767 and Constable’s Book, 1755–1813 Madge Dresser and Andrew Hann (eds), Slavery and the perry carter 121 British country house Lucinda Lambton, Palaces for pigs: Animal architecture and briony mcdonagh 122 other beastly buildings Mark Johnston, Trees in towns and cities: A history of British paul elliott 122 urban arboriculture Seán Beattie, Donegal in transition: the impact of the eoin mclaughlin 124 Congested Districts Board Susanna Wade Martins, The conservation movement in david matless 125 Norfolk: A history Andrew Connell, Appleby Gypsy Horse Fair: Mythology, jennifer s.
    [Show full text]
  • River Humber
    ASSOCIATED BRITISH PORTS P O BOX 1, PORT HOUSE, NORTHERN GATEWAY, HULL HU9 5PQ STANDING NOTICE TO MARINERS (No. S.H. 12) R I V E R H U M B E R NOTICE TO SHIP MASTERS AND PILOTS REGARDING REPORTING PROCEDURE MARINERS ARE REQUIRED to report to VTS, HUMBER on VHF as defined in Standing Notice to Mariners S.H. 2, when:- 1. Passing the following reporting points: i. Humber Light Float, Outer Sea Reach Light Buoy or Outer Rosse Reach Light Buoy. ii. When Pilot embarks / disembarks. iii. Spurn Light Float / No. 2 Haile Sand Light Buoy. iv. When anchoring. v. On passing No. 4A Clee Ness Light Float call on the appropriate VHF channel for the area you are entering. vi. Sunk Spit Light Buoy, (inwards only) vii. No. 9A Light Float. (outwards only) viii. No. 19 Paull Sand Light Buoy. ix. On passing Humber Bridge call on the appropriate VHF channel for the area you are entering.. x. Brough. xi. When entering or departing the River Trent or River Ouse at Trent Falls. xii. Passing Skelton Railway Bridge. xiii. Passing Keadby Railway Bridge. xiv. When all fast or departing any lock or any berth. Page 1 of 2 2. All vessels when either: • Singled up and ready to let go from a river berth or • Prior to leaving a lock when gates are open will ask VTS Humber for clearance to sail. Having been given clearance to sail, if any delay is then envisaged, the vessel should inform VTS and seek further clearance when the cause of the delay is resolved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Humber Estuary Committee
    Humber Estuary The Humber Estuary Committee Joint members • Anglian Water, Severn-Trent Water, Yorkshire Water National Rivers Authority Guildbourne House Worthing Please return this book on or before last date shown below. Renewals can be obtained by contacting the library. 7 ‘V- * ©N y £r- j ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 062041 \ i v /n n «wvv G U I L D £ : W O h l H i THE WATER QUALITY OF THE HUMBER ESTUARY 1 9 8 6 Report edited for the Humber Estuary Committee by A Edwards, R Freestone and C Urquhart of Yorkshire Water September 1987 Anglian Water Severn-Trent Water Yorkshire Water Ambury Road Abelson House West Riding House Huntingdon 2297 Coventry Road 67 Albion Street Cambridgeshire Birmingham Leeds PEI8 6NZ B26 3PR LSI 5AA SUMMARY The Humber Estuary Committee of the Anglian, Severn-Trent and Yorkshire Water Authorities co-ordinates the water quality management and monitoring of the estuary. Environmental quality objectives based on protecting existing and potential future uses of the water have been established. These are defined by quality standards set for the water column. Routine monitoring programmes, which are supplemented by intensive special surveys, cover the chemical quality of the Humber and its tidal rivers, freshwater river and effluent inputs, metal accumulation in sediments and organisms, and the invertebrate fauna. The results for 1986 show that the outer Estuary is of high quality with a diverse benthic fauna. The main water quality problem is the depletion of dissolved oxygen levels at times of low freshwater flows in the tidal Ouse, Aire and Don and which also affects the lower Trent and upper Humber.
    [Show full text]
  • Humber Eel Management Issues: Barriers and Stocking
    UNIVERSITY OF Hull International Fisheries Institute HIFI Humber eel management issues: barriers and stocking FINAL REPORT A. D. Nunn, J. P. Harvey, R. A. A. Noble & I. G. Cowx April 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. LIST OF TABLES iv LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF PLATES v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS viii 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. OBJECTIVES 1 2.1 Specific objectives 2 3. PROJECT STRATEGY 2 3.1 Identification of eel migration barriers 2 3.1.1 Collection and collation of fisheries data 2 3.1.2 Prioritisation of eel migration barriers 2 3.2 Elver stocking 3 4. DEVELOPMENT OF PRIORITISATION MATRICES 3 4.1 Eel migration barrier prioritisation matrix 3 4.2 Elver stocking prioritisation matrix 6 5. PRIORITISATION OF EEL MIGRATION BARRIERS 7 5.1 River Hull 7 5.2 Yorkshire Ouse 11 5.3 Yorkshire Derwent 11 5.4 River Ure 13 5.5 River Swale 14 5.6 River Nidd 15 5.7 River Wharfe 16 5.8 River Trent 17 5.9 River Don 19 5.10 River Rother 20 5.11 River Dearne 21 5.12 River Aire 22 5.13 River Calder 23 5.14 River Ancholme 24 5.15 River Foulness/Market Weighton Canal 25 5.16 Swinefleet Warping Drain 26 5.17 Tetney Haven 26 5.18 Adlingfleet Drain 27 5.19 Pauper’s Drain 27 5.20 Bosky Dyke (Keadby Warping Drain) 28 6. PRIORITISATION OF ELVER STOCKING AREAS 28 6.1 Yorkshire Ouse 28 6.2 Yorkshire Derwent 36 6.3 River Ure 39 6.4 River Trent 39 6.5 River Don 46 6.6 River Rother 49 6.7 River Dearne 51 6.8 River Aire 54 6.9 River Calder 57 6.10 River Ancholme 60 ii 6.11 Swinefleet Warping Drain 60 6.12 Tetney Haven 62 6.13 Adlingfleet Drain 62 6.14 Pauper’s Drain 62 6.15 Bosky Dyke (Keadby Warping Drain) 64 7.
    [Show full text]
  • The Humber Estuary European Marine Site
    THE HUMBER ESTUARY EUROPEAN MARINE SITE comprising: Humber Estuary possible Special Area of Conservation Humber Flats, Marshes and Coast Special Protection Area & potential Special Protection Area Humber Flats, Marshes and Coast Ramsar Site & proposed Ramsar Site English Nature¶s advice given under Regulation 33(2) of the Conservation (Natural Habitats &c.) Regulations 1994 INTERIM ADVICE APRIL 2003 Interim advice issued April 2003 English Nature¶s advice for the Humber Estuary European marine site given under Regulation 33(2) of the Conservation (Natural Habitats &c.) Regulations 1994 Preface This document provides English Nature¶s advice to other relevant authorities as to (a) the conservation objectives and (b) any operations which may cause deterioration of natural habitats or the habitats of species, or disturbance of species for the Humber Estuary European marine site. This advice is being prepared to fulfil our obligations under Regulation 33(2) of the Conservation (Natural Habitats &c.) Regulations 1994. European sites include Special Areas of Conservation (designated under the Habitats Directive, which support certain natural habitats and species of European importance) and Special Protection Areas (classified under the Birds Directive which support significant numbers of internationally important wild birds). Ramsar sites support internationally important wetlands and wetland species (listed under the Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat). In accordance with DETR'si Planning Policy Guidance (PPG9) and the DETR statement Ramsar Sites in England (November 2000); Ramsar sites must be given the same consideration as European sites when considering plans and projects that may affect them. European marine sites are defined in the Conservation (Natural Habitats &c.) Regulations 1994 as any part of a European site covered (continuously or intermittently) by tidal waters or any part of the sea in or adjacent to Great Britain up to the seaward limit of territorial waters.
    [Show full text]