Landscape and Visual Appraisal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Landscape and Visual Appraisal LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL APPRAISAL MRS COWELL & MRS DONNELLY LAND NORTH OF CLOPHILL ROAD MAULDEN, BEDFORDSHIRE REF. NO. 3206_RP_001 STATUS: PLANNING DOCUMENT CREATED: 25.11.2014 REVISIONS REVISION D 19/10/16 LLOYD BORE LTD 33 ST GEORGE’S PLACE CANTERBURY KENT, CT1 1UT Tel: 01227 464340 Fax: 01227 464341 [email protected] www.lloydbore.co.uk 3206_RP_001 | LANDSCAPE & VISUAL APPRAISAL FOR MRS COWELL & MRS DONNELLY PLANNING PREFACE This LVIA assessment and report were originally undertaken between November 2014 and January 2015. Following a preliminary planning submission the scheme was subsequently withdrawn in light of various comments received, for further review and design development. A revised scheme was produced and the details of the original and revised schemes are provided in Section 3 of this report. Upon review of the original assessment and the nature of the revised scheme, it has been concluded unnecessary to undertaken a completely new Landscape & Visual Impact Assessment for the revised scheme. It is the professional opinion of this report that no significant changes in baseline conditions has occurred since the original assessment that would have an impact upon the assessment process of conclusions of the original report. It is also the professional opinion of this report that the changes to the scheme that have resulted will also result in no measurable change in the assessed effect or impact of the proposed development on either landscape character or visual amenity. This statement therefore confirms that it is the professional opinion of Lloyd Bore that the assessment and conclusions contained within this report remain valid and accurate. 19/10/2016 1 3206_RP_001 | LANDSCAPE & VISUAL APPRAISAL FOR MRS COWELL & MRS DONNELLY PLANNING CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION. 2 Guidance �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������2 Assessment Approach �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������2 Structure of the Report���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������3 2. SCOPING ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 4 Establishing the Study Area���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������4 Sources of Information ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������4 Nature of Potential ‘Effects’ ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������4 Key Receptors �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������5 3. BASELINE STUDIES ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 8 The Site and Surroundings �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������8 Topography �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������10 Land use / Land cover���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������12 Public Rights of Way�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������13 Settlement Envelope �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������14 Landscape Character Areas �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������15 Visual Context and Accessibility �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������19 4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������22 Key Features and Components ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������22 Assumptions �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������23 5. IDENTIFICATION OF EFFECTS ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������24 Visual Amenity�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������24 Landscape Resource �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������34 Landscape Character Areas �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������34 6. SUMMARY & CONCLUSION. .36 Nature of Potential Effects ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������36 Ability to Accommodate Development ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������36 Overall Conclusion ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������36 7. APPENDIX 1: METHODOLOGY . .37 Assessment Methodology���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������37 Assessment Tables & Matrices ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������37 Scoping �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������37 Baseline Studies�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������37 Project Description�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������40 Identification of Effects�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������41 Definitions and Terminology �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������43 Author: Andrew Cox CMLI, Dip LA, (Bsc Hon) Head of Landscape Checked / Approved by: Julian Bore CMLI, Managing Director 19/10/2016 Introduction | 2 3206_RP_001 | LANDSCAPE & VISUAL APPRAISAL FOR MRS COWELL & MRS DONNELLY PLANNING 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 This document has been produced on behalf of Mrs Cowell and ASSESSMENT APPROACH - The anticipated ‘nature of change’ which will be brought Mrs Donnelly, to accompany a planning application for proposed about by the proposed development residential development, on land north of Clophill Road, Maulden, 1.4 The Landscape Institute have published a ‘GLVIA3 Statement of - Whether the proposed development will, on balance, be Bedfordshire Clarification 1/13 June 2013’ to provide clarification of the effect of the latest LVIA guidance upon the recommended approach for beneficial, adverse or neutral. 1.2 The purpose of this report is to undertake an impartial landscape and undertaking landscape and visual impact assessments Table 1: Types of landscape and visual impact assessment. visual appraisal (LVA) of the proposed development It will: 1.5 With specific reference to ‘Non EIA Landscape and Visual Impact • Describe the existing baseline conditions with regard to key Appraisals’ this states; Assessment Terminology / Scope landscape components and identify the unique landscape character areas (LCAs) that result from the combination of these ‘In carrying out appraisals, the same principles and process as LVIA Report components for an appropriately sized study area may be applied but, in so doing, it is not required to establish EIA Type Effect” Neutral Change” “Nature of Adverse / Magnitude “Degree of Cumulative Beneficial / Operational Assessment whether the effects arising are or are not significant given that Construction “Significance” Phase Impacts Phase Impacts • Assess the sensitivity of the existing landscape in terms of Susceptibility / the exercise is not being undertaken for EIA purposes. The character and views, and establish its ability to accommodate LVIA reason is that should a landscape professional apply LVIA principles ü ü ü ü ü ü ü x ü change (EIA) and processes in carrying out an appraisal and then go on to • Describe the anticipated changes resulting from the proposed LVIA determine that certain effects would be likely be significant, given the (non x ( ü ) ü ( ü ) ü ü x ü ü development, and assess the ‘magnitude of change’ upon term ‘significant’ is enshrined in EIA Regulations, such a judgement EIA) landscape character and views could trigger the requirement for a formal EIA. The emphasis on LVA x x ü x ü x x x ü • Determine the ‘degree of effect’ of identified impacts with regards likely ‘significant effects’ in formal LVIA stresses the
Recommended publications
  • Greensand Ridge Local Action Group Local Development Strategy 2014-20
    Greensand Ridge Local Action Group Local Development Strategy 2014-20 Contents 1. The Local Action Group Partnership 1.1 Membership 1 1.2 Structure and decision making process 2 1.3 Local Action Group staff, numbers and job descriptions 3 1.4 Equal Opportunities statement 4 1.5 Involvement of the community and consultation activity undertaken 5 1.6 Training requirements 5 2. The LAG Area 2.1 Map of the Area 6 2.2 Rural population covered 7 3. The Strategy 3.1 Analysis of the local area 8 3.2 Our local priorities 15 3.3 Evidence of alignment with LEP activity 18 3.4 Programmes of activity 20 3.5 Targets, results and outputs 23 3.6 Sustainability appraisal 25 3.7 Proposed co-operation activity 26 4. Management and Administration 4.1 Accountable Body 27 4.2 Project Development and Assessment Procedures 28 4.3 Claims and Payments 28 4.4 Monitoring & Evaluation 29 4.5 Communications and Publicity 29 4.6 Action Plan 30 5. Financial Plan 5.1 Split of Expenditure 31 5.2 Intervention rates and match funding 31 5.3. Anticipated range of grant size 31 5.4 Outputs and expenditure by policy priority 32 5.5 Annual financial profile 33 Appendix A Letter of endorsement from SEMLEP 34 Appendix B Letter of endorsement from GCGP LEP 35 This Local Development Strategy is submitted on behalf of the Greensand Ridge Local Action Group by: Signed (for the LAG): Signed (for the AB): Name: Charles Whitbread Name: Jon Boswell Position: Chair Position: Chief Executive, BRCC Date: 5th September 2014 Date: 5th September 2014 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Brogborough Wind Energy Development
    March 2014 BROGBOROUGH WIND ENERGY DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT VOLUME TWO ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT MAIN TEXT FCC Environment Ltd [3512084A] [Final] Brogborough Wind Energy Development - Environmental Statement Volume 2 – Main Text Prepared for FCC Environment Ltd Ground Floor West 900 Pavillion Drive Northampton NN4 7RG Prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff Amber Court William Armstrong Drive Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 7YQ 0191 226 2501 www.pbworld.com Brogborough Wind Energy Development - Environmental Statement CONTENTS Page Introduction 11 1 Introduction 13 1.1 Purpose of the Environmental Statement 13 1.2 The Developer 13 1.3 The Consultant 13 1.4 The Project 14 1.5 Scoping 15 1.6 The Environmental Statement 15 1.7 Copies of the ES 16 1.8 Consultations 16 1.9 Cumulative Impact Assessment 17 Need For And Benefits Of The Project 19 2 Needs For and Benefits Of The Project 21 2.1 Overview 21 2.2 Climate Change 21 2.3 Tackling Climate Change 22 2.4 European Climate Change Programme 22 2.5 UK Climate Change Programme 23 2.6 Renewables Obligation and Renewables Targets 23 2.7 Climate Change within Local Planning Policy 25 2.8 Renewable Energy in the UK 25 2.9 Wind Energy in the UK 26 2.10 Additional Benefits of the Proposed Development 26 2.11 Economic Benefits 26 2.12 Power Supply Benefits 27 2.13 Environmental Benefits 28 Planning Policy 31 3 Planning Policy 33 3.1 Introduction 33 3.2 The Plan-Led System 33 3.3 The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) 33 3.4 Meeting National Planning Guidance 38 3.5 Meeting the challenge of
    [Show full text]
  • Mid Bedfordshire Green Infrastructure Plan
    Contents Foreword 4 Acknowledgements 5 Executive Summary 6 1.0 Introduction 10 1.1 Need for the Plan 10 1.2 Policy Background 11 1.3 What is Green Infrastructure? 12 1.4 Aim & Objectives 13 2.0 Context 14 2.1 Environmental context 14 2.2 Growth context 15 3.0 The Plan Preparation Process 18 3.1 Baseline Review 18 3.2 Stakeholder & Community Consultation 19 3.3 Integration Process 20 3.4 The Green Infrastructure Network 20 3.5 Project Lists 21 4.0 Network Area Descriptions and Project List 24 4.1 Forest of Marston Vale 24 4.2 The Ivel Valley 29 4.3 The Greensand Ridge 33 4.4 The Flit Valley 34 4.5 The Southern Clay Ridge and Vale 35 4.6 The Chilterns 36 5.0 Implementation 38 5.1 Introduction 38 5.2 Project Prioritisation 38 5.3 Delivering through the Planning System 38 5.4 Agriculture & Forestry 40 5.5 Local Communities 40 5.6 Partner Organisations 40 5.7 Funding 41 5.8 Monitoring & Review 41 6.0 Landscape 43 7.0 Historic Environment 57 8.0 Biodiversity 64 9.0 Accessible Greenspace 77 10.0 Access Routes 86 Appendices 96 1 Bedfordshire and Luton Green Infrastructure Consortium Members 97 2 Existing GI Assets on Base Maps 98 3 Themes Leaders 99 4 Workshop Results and Attendees 100 5 Potential Criteria for Prioritising GI Projects 126 6 Landscape 128 Appendix 6a – Table of Valued Landmarks, Views and Sites Appendix 6b – Condition of Landscape Character Areas 7 Historic Environment 131 Appendix 7a Historic Environment Character Areas in Mid Bedfordshire 8 Accessible Greenspace 140 8a.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspley Woods and Heaths' (England)
    CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY HELEN KING PEOPLE IN NATURE AND NATURE IN PEOPLE: A CONSTRUCTIVIST EXPLORATION OF ECOSYSTEM CULTURAL SERVICES PhD Thesis Academic Year 2011 – 2012 Supervised by Dr. Paul Burgess CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF APPLIED SCIENCES Centre for Environmental Risks and Futures PhD Thesis Academic Year 2011 – 2012 HELEN PAULA KING People in nature and nature in people: a constructivist exploration of ecosystem cultural services Supervisor: Dr. Paul Burgess Submitted 31.05.2012 This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD © Cranfield University 2012. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright owner. i ABSTRACT The ecosystem services approach is a set of institutional practices which aim to improve natural resource management and policy making, by highlighting the relationship between well-functioning ecosystems and human wellbeing. Within the approach, cultural services (CS) signify the psycho-social aspects of people-nature interrelations. This concept is an understudied area, and is recognised to exhibit high levels of complexity which make it difficult to evaluate. This thesis deconstructs, explores, clarifies and enhances the CS concept. A flexible, phased research design explores cultural services in relation to a specific case-study site, 'Aspley Woods and Heaths' (England). Cultural services are examined through a series of lenses: as an interdisciplinary construct, as an experience of place, as context, as a resource regime, as a discursive resource and as a personal discourse. Mixed qualitative methods identify how CS is constructed through action, speech and text; via an in depth analysis of primary data from semi-structured visitor and expert interviews, unstructured key informant interviews, and marginal participant observation.
    [Show full text]
  • South East Walker June 2015
    SOUTH EAST No. 90 June 2015 Farewellwalker ‘Old Father Thames’ avid Sharp, the artist, copywriter and photographer was made fetchingly attractive by instigator of the Thames whose day job when I first knew a thumb-nail index running down DPath and who devoted him was in a small advertising one side. We sold them at 6d (2.5p) much of his life to the Ramblers, agency off Covent Garden. Here, a throw and they went like hot died on 20 April, aged 89. He five days a week, he turned his cakes. was a key figure in the Ramblers skills to whatever products the In the early 1970s we needed a both regionally as president of agency was trying to sell. At newsier looking magazine. David Surrey Area and nationally as a evenings and weekends he put those designed it. The back numbers Vice President and also served skills at the service of the Ramblers’ look old-fashioned now, but they in Richmond and West London Association. were state-of-the-art then and they groups. It is hard to recall now any items enabled us to combine Ramblers’ Chris Hall, a fellow Vice President of publicity which he did not design. news and propaganda effectively. of the Ramblers, writes: Without His clear, bold lines are to be found We needed a new logo. These the talent and devotion of David in scores of recruiting leaflets and days design would be shuffled Sharp, sustained year after year, the campaign flyers. When we needed off expensively to an outside design reached the end of its useful novices.
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTH EAST No
    SOUTH EAST No. 89 March 2015 Strangewalker case of the missing boardwalk Ramblers honour Bucks path champion he Buckinghamshire, he made massive improvements. Milton Keynes and Under his leadership the county’s TWest Middlesex Area of paths were transformed - in the the Ramblers has honoured the past walking in the less-trodden work of Mike Walker, former north Bucks was like negotiating Environment Group Manager an assault course, now the paths for Buckinghamshire County are in far better condition. It Council, with a commemorative is sad for all of us that Mike has gate on a footpath at Great retired from the council but we Missenden. are pleased he is still involved on Mike, who retired last year, national committees, promoting managed Buckinghamshire’s public paths and their value to the network of public rights of way public. We all have much to thank for 30 years. The Ramblers’ have him for, in making conditions celebrated Mike’s work with a for walkers, riders and cyclists in gate under the Chiltern Society’s Bucks so much better.’ ‘donate a gate’ scheme, on Great Says Mike: ‘I am truly honoured At the scene of the crime: (left to right) Eugene Suggett, Jonathan Lord MP and Brian Reader. Photo: John Plympton Missenden footpath 51. The that the Ramblers and Chiltern hen Surrey Ramblers Farnham Group undertake Luckily it was dry when the work gate is on the north-eastern edge Society, who do such great work to invited their monthly path maintenance tasks was done, but with autumn and of Hobbshill Wood from which encourage and protect access to the W local Member of for Surrey County Council, winter rain the path soon reverted there is a fine view over Great countryside, wish to commemorate Parliament along to a walk sometimes involving quite major to its usual boggy condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal Decisions, but Each of These Involved Housing Or a Mixed Use Development (LPA 1, 2.5)
    Ms Kee Evans Our Ref: APP/J0405/A/13/2205701 Eversheds Llp, Your Ref: 203912.000003 1 Callaghan Square Cardiff CF10 5BT 22 December 2015 Dear Madam, TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 78 APPEAL BY FORCE 9 ENERGY LLP AND EDF ER AT LAND TO THE SOUTH OF DORCAS LANE, SOUTH-WEST OF STOKE HAMMOND AND NORTH-WEST OF SOULBURY APPLICATION REF: 11/02798/APP DATED 21 DECEMBER 2011 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of the Inspector, Jessica Graham BA(Hons) PgDipL, who held a public local inquiry on 24, 25, 26 and 27 June, and 1, 2, 3 and 4 July into your client's appeal against a decision of Aylesbury Vale District Council (the Council) to refuse planning permission for the installation of four turbines up to a maximum of 125m in height, an anemometer mast, sub-station building, access tracks, electricity connections, transformer kiosks and temporary construction compound and storage area in accordance with application 11/02798/APP, dated 21 December 2011, which was refused by notice dated 20 March 2013. 2. On 10 April 2014 the appeal was recovered for the Secretary of State's determination in pursuance of section 79 of, and paragraph 3 to Schedule 6 to, the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 because the appeal involves a renewable energy development. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 3. The Inspector recommended that the appeal be dismissed and planning permission refused. For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s conclusions and agrees with his recommendation.
    [Show full text]
  • Greensand Ridge Walk Section 3
    The Greensand Ridge Walk Walk Ampthill to Haynes 3 8.8 miles/13.5km 1 Walk up the hill along Bedford Street. At 6 Turn left and follow the road for 430m the top of the hill cross the road and follow before turning right onto the bridleway past the concrete path along the top of the ridge Hill Farm to the road. Turn left and follow towards Houghton House. At the farm the road for 90m and then turn right onto buildings turn right and follow the track a grass track, bearing right across the fi eld behind the barns to King’s Wood. to Deadman’s Cross. 2 Turn right and follow the fi eld boundaries down the hill to King’s Farm, across The Brache, and into Maulden. Turn left and follow George Street for 260m, turning left to the church before The George public house. 3 Walk through the churchyard and then turn left, through the church car park, into Church Meadow. Follow the waymarked route to Maulden Wood. Follow the southern edge of the wood past a round thatched cottage and the Forest Lodge to the A6. 4 Cross the dual carriageway with care and follow the signs downhill before turning left up the steps into an area of woodland. Follow the waymarked path until you reach Back Maulden Heath Street in Clophill. Turn left and follow the road for 250m before turning left at the bend into The Slade. Walk up this road then branch to the right towards Kiln Farm. At the farm, turn right into Old Kiln Lane, walk past an orchard and then turn left to follow Kiln Lane.
    [Show full text]
  • Sense of Place Toolkit INTRODUCTION
    Sense of Place Toolkit INTRODUCTION Contents INTRODUCTION . 4 START HERE — How to use this Toolkit . 10 EXPLORE — Walking, cycling and riding routes . 16 EXPERIENCE — What’s on and things to do . 22 DISCOVER — What makes Greensand Country special . 32 Greensand Country is a beautiful and loved landscape. It is defined by the Greensand Ridge, a band of higher ground stretching from Leighton Buzzard to Gamlingay, which rises out of the surrounding vales to create a locally unique environment. The area contains all of Bedfordshire’s remaining heathland, more than half of its woodland and 29 historic parklands. It is a landscape rich in wildlife and cultural heritage, with its own special qualities and sense of place. A ‘green oasis’ of peace and quiet, rolling countryside and breath-taking views. A place where people feel able to slow down, unwind and connect with nature. Somewhere to escape urban life, breathe easy and feel uplifted. Come and discover it for yourself ! This Toolkit can help you make the most of being a part of Greensand Country. It contains ideas for how to improve your marketing; your customer relations and visitor welcome; and your own enjoyment of the landscape. By working together, we can build a strong brand for Greensand Country that benefits everyone.Let’s get started…! Greensand Country 2 Sense of Place Toolkit INTRODUCTION Leighton Buzzard Canal Greensand Country Sense of Place Toolkit 3 INTRODUCTION Introduction Welcome to the Sense of Place Toolkit: a resource for helping you to get the most out of being in Greensand Country. Your business, community group or organisation is located in a special landscape surrounded by some of the best-loved and most beautiful countryside in England.
    [Show full text]
  • Rushmere and Stockgrove and Rushmere Sandy and Everton Everton and Sandy
    original Estate. original Park forms the rest of the the of rest the forms Park around Charcoal Pond. Pond. Charcoal around gardens, Rushmere Country Country Rushmere gardens, to heathland and conserve important marshy areas, such as as such areas, marshy important conserve and heathland to with the current house and and house current the with as The Warren. The Greensand Trust is working to restore areas areas restore to working is Trust Greensand The Warren. The as two World Wars. Along Along Wars. World two plantations, these conifers were planted on a heathland, known known heathland, a on planted were conifers these plantations, houses built between the the between built houses conifers with some scattered oak trees. As with Rushmere’s Rushmere’s with As trees. oak scattered some with conifers was one of the largest country country largest the of one was Despite the name, this wood consists mostly of planted planted of mostly consists wood this name, the Despite Georgian style and the house house the and style Georgian Oak Wood Oak estate houses were built in a mock mock a in built were houses estate site of a previous property. The Stockgrove mansion and and mansion Stockgrove The property. previous a of site with birch scrub. scrub. birch with in 1928, and proceeded to have a new house built on the the on built house new a have to proceeded and 1928, in food for grazing livestock. The Heath has now grown over over grown now has Heath The livestock. grazing for food Ferdinand Michael Kroyer-Kielberg KBE purchased the estate estate the purchased KBE Kroyer-Kielberg Michael Ferdinand been cut for fuel and building materials as well as providing providing as well as materials building and fuel for cut been Stockgrove House Stockgrove would have dominated this area for thousands of years and and years of thousands for area this dominated have would Oak Heath of trees completely.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining the Special Qualities of Local Landscape Designations in Aylesbury Vale District
    Defining the special qualities of local landscape designations in Aylesbury Vale District Final Report Prepared by LUC August 2015 Aylesbury Vale Local Landscape Designations 1 Project Title: Aylesbury Vale: Local Landscape Designations Client: Aylesbury Vale District Council Version Date Version Details Prepared by Approved by 0.1 Draft Kate Rebecca Knight Anderson C:\Users\Anderson_K\Documents\workingfiles\unionsquare.landuse.co.uk\Aylesbury Vale Local Landscape Designations.docx Aylesbury Vale Local Landscape Designations 2 Defining the special qualities of local landscape designations in Aylesbury Vale District Draft Report Prepared by LUC August 2015 Planning & EIA LUC LONDON Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Registered in England Design 43 Chalton Street Bristol Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning London NW1 1JD Glasgow Registered Office: Landscape Management T 020 7383 5784 Edinburgh 43 Chalton Street Ecology F 020 7383 4798 London NW1 1JD LUC uses 100% recycled paper Mapping & Visualisation [email protected] FS 566056 Aylesbury Vale Local Landscape Designations EMS 566057 3 Contents 1 Introduction 4 Policy context 5 Aylesbury Vale’s Valued Landscapes 5 2 Methodology 10 3 Local Landscape Designations: Descriptions 12 1. Stowe 14 2. Brickhills 18 3. Quainton - Wing Hills 22 4. Brill – Winchendon Hills 26 5. Ivinghoe 30 6. Halton/Wendover 33 7. Great Ouse Valley West 36 8. Great Ouse Valley East 40 9. Whaddon Nash Valley 44 10. Poundon Hill 48 11. Westend Hill – Southend Hill 51 12. Halton 53 4 Recommendations 55 Aylesbury Vale Local Landscape Designations 3 1 Introduction 1.1 LUC was commissioned by Aylesbury Vale District Council (AVDC) to provide evidence on the special qualities and values of locally designated landscapes within the district - the Areas of Attractive Landscape (AAL) and Local Landscape Areas (LLAs), to enhance the Council’s landscape evidence base and to inform the Local Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme of Walks
    W T 7 1 E S n o d n o L t n e m k n a b m E t r e b l A 0 9 - 7 8 , e s u o H d r o f l e m a C r o o l F d n 2 : e c i f f o d e r e t s i g e R . e r t n e C n o i t a m r o f n I . ) 2 9 4 8 5 4 4 : o n n o i t a r t s i g e r y n a p m o c ( e t a i r p o r p p a e h t t c a t n o c n e h t y a t s o t t n a w u o y e r e h w e d i c e d a W d n a d n a l g n E n i d e r e t s i g e r e e t n a r a u g y b s e l d n a e m m a r g o r p e h t t u o k c e h c o s s e r t n e C n o i t a m r o f n I t s i r u o T d e t i m i l y n a p m o c a d n a , ) 9 9 7 9 3 0 : o n ( d n a l t o c S n i y t i r a h c d e r e t s i g e r a , ) 7 7 5 3 9 0 1 : o n ( s e l a W & d n a l g n E n i y t i r a h c d e r e t s i g e r a s i s r e l b m a R e h T e h t e r a e g d e l w o n k t s o m h t i w e l p o e P .
    [Show full text]