DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Reports of the Interim Joint, Special, and Statutory Committees 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Reports of the Interim Joint, Special, and Statutory Committees 2011 Final Reports of the Interim Joint, Special, and Statutory Committees 2011 Informational Bulletin No. 237 Legislative Research Commission Frankfort, Kentucky December 2011 Final Reports of the Interim Joint, Special, and Statutory Committees 2011 Presented to the Legislative Research Commission and the 2012 Regular Session of the Kentucky General Assembly Informational Bulletin No. 237 Legislative Research Commission Frankfort, Kentucky lrc.ky.gov December 2011 Paid for with state funds. Available in alternative form by request. Legislative Research Commission Foreword 2011 Final Committee Reports Foreword Sections 36 and 42 of the Kentucky Constitution provide that the General Assembly shall meet on the “first Tuesday after the first Monday in January” for 60 legislative days in even- numbered years, and for 30 legislative days, including up to 10 days for an organizational component, in odd-numbered years. Between legislative sessions, the interim joint committees of the Legislative Research Commission (LRC), as well as special and statutory committees, meet to discuss and receive testimony on a number of important issues that may confront the General Assembly. During the 2011 Interim, all 15 interim joint committees held meetings. One special committee met in 2011. All eight statutory committees met during the 2011 Interim. LRC provides this informational booklet as a summary of the activity of the interim joint, special, and statutory committees since adjournment of the 2011 General Assembly. The reports were prepared separately by the committee staff. Robert Sherman Director Legislative Research Commission Frankfort, Kentucky December 2011 i Legislative Research Commission Contents 2011 Final Committee Reports Contents Reports of the 2011 Interim Joint Committees Agriculture .......................................................................................................................................1 Appropriations and Revenue ............................................................................................................7 Banking and Insurance ...................................................................................................................27 Economic Development and Tourism ...........................................................................................31 Education .......................................................................................................................................47 Energy ............................................................................................................................................63 Health and Welfare ........................................................................................................................67 Judiciary .........................................................................................................................................77 Labor and Industry .........................................................................................................................85 Licensing and Occupations ............................................................................................................89 Local Government .........................................................................................................................97 Natural Resources and Environment ...........................................................................................105 State Government.........................................................................................................................111 Transportation ..............................................................................................................................125 Veterans, Military Affairs, and Public Protection .......................................................................137 Reports of the 2011 Special Committee Task Force on the Penal Code and Controlled Substances Act ...................................................143 Reports of the Statutory Committees Administrative Regulation Review Subcommittee ......................................................................151 Capital Planning Advisory Board ................................................................................................153 Capital Projects and Bond Oversight Committee ........................................................................157 Education Assessment and Accountability Review Subcommittee.............................................169 Government Contract Review Committee ...................................................................................173 Medicaid Oversight and Advisory Committee ............................................................................177 Program Review and Investigations Committee..........................................................................179 Tobacco Settlement Agreement Fund Oversight Committee ......................................................185 iii Legislative Research Commission Agriculture 2011 Final Committee Reports Report of the 2011 Interim Joint Committee on Agriculture Sen. David Givens, Co-Chair Rep. Tom McKee, Co-Chair Sen. Joe Bowen Rep. Myron Dossett Sen. Carroll Gibson Rep. C.B. Embry, Jr. Sen. Paul Hornback Rep. Jim Glenn Sen. Bob Leeper Rep. Sara Beth Gregory Sen. Vernie McGaha Rep. Richard Henderson Sen. Dennis Parrett Rep. Kim King Sen. Joey Pendleton Rep. Martha Jane King Sen. Dorsey Ridley Rep. Michael Meredith Sen. Damon Thayer Rep. Terry Mills Sen. Robin Webb Rep. Brad Montell Sen. Ken Winters Rep. Fred Nesler Rep. Royce W. Adams Rep. David Osborne Rep. John A. Arnold, Jr. Rep. Sannie Overly Rep. Johnny Bell Rep. Ryan Quarles Rep. John “Bam” Carney Rep. Tom Riner Rep. Mike Cherry Rep. Steven Rudy Rep. James R. Comer, Jr. Rep. Rita Smart Rep. Will Coursey Rep. Wilson Stone Rep. Jim DeCesare Rep. Tommy Turner Rep. Mike Denham Rep. Susan Westrom LRC Staff: Tanya Monsanto, Lowell Atchley, Biff Baker, Stefan Kasacavage, Kelly Blevins, and Susan Spoonamore. Presented to the Legislative Research Commission and the 2012 Regular Session of the Kentucky General Assembly 1 Agriculture Legislative Research Commission 2011 Final Committee Reports Subcommittee Organization and Membership Subcommittee on Horse Farming Sen. Damon Thayer, Co-Chair Rep. Susan Westrom, Co-Chair Sen. Carroll Gibson Rep. Brad Montell Sen. Dennis Parrett Rep. Fred Nesler Sen. Joey Pendleton Rep. David Osborne Sen. Robin Webb Rep. Sannie Overly Rep. Royce W. Adams Rep. Ryan Quarles Rep. Sara Beth Gregory Rep. Tom Riner Rep. Richard Henderson Rep. Rita Smart Rep. Martha Jane King Rep. Wilson Stone Rep. Michael Meredith Sen. David Givens, ex officio Rep. Tom McKee, ex officio LRC Staff: Lowell Atchley and Kelly Blevins Subcommittee on Rural Issues Sen. Vernie McGaha, Co-Chair Rep. Mike Denham, Co-Chair Sen. Joe Bowen Rep. Will Coursey Sen. Paul Hornback Rep. Jim DeCesare Sen. Bob Leeper Rep. Myron Dossett Sen. Dorsey Ridley Rep. C.B. Embry Sen. Ken Winters Rep. Jim Glenn Rep. John A. Arnold, Jr. Rep. Kim King Rep. Johnny Bell Rep. Terry Mills Rep. John “Bam” Carney Rep. Steven Rudy Rep. Mike Cherry Rep. Tommy Turner Rep. James R. Comer, Jr. Sen. David Givens, Co-Chair Rep. Tom McKee, Co-Chair LRC Staff: Stefan Kasacavage and Susan Spoonamore 2 Legislative Research Commission Agriculture 2011 Final Committee Reports Interim Joint Committee on Agriculture Jurisdiction: Matters pertaining to crops, livestock, poultry, and their marketing; disease control; warehousing; tobacco; stockyards; agricultural cooperatives and marketing associations; agriculture weights and measures; veterinarians; the State Fair; and county fairs. Committee Activity The Interim Joint Committee on Agriculture held six meetings during the 2011 Interim. Several committee meetings were held outside of Frankfort in order to visit various sites engaged in agricultural operations. The Subcommittee on Horse Farming and the Subcommittee on Rural Issues were reauthorized by the committee, and each held two meetings during the Interim. Various topics were discussed, and several agencies and organizations updated the committee members on ongoing projects and proposed legislative suggestions for the 2012 Regular Session. The committee received legislative proposals and comments for the 2012 Regular Session from representatives of the Governor’s Office of Agricultural Policy, the Kentucky Farm Bureau, the Community Farm Alliance, the Animal Control Advisory Board, the Kentucky Board of Veterinary Examiners, and the Kentucky Department of Agriculture. At the State Fair, the president of the State Fair Board updated committee members on fair activities and projects being undertaken by the board. In addition, a proposed USDA rule for improving livestock traceability was discussed by the state veterinarian, and an update on the status of a federal guidance document regarding agricultural vehicles was given by LRC staff. The committee toured the Eastern Kentucky University Center for Renewable and Alternative Fuel Technologies and heard a discussion of biofuels and bioenergy from the director of the center, the director of the Division of Biofuels, and the executive director of the Governor’s Office of Agricultural Policy. The committee also visited the Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory in Lexington and a stockyard in Glasgow. At the stockyard, there were updates from the state veterinarian regarding the disposal of dead animals and the status of the Eastern Livestock Bankruptcy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Disaggregating the Scare from the Greens
    DISAGGREGATING THE SCARE FROM THE GREENS Lee Hall*† INTRODUCTION When the Vermont Law Review graciously asked me to contribute to this Symposium focusing on the tension between national security and fundamental values, specifically for a segment on ecological and animal- related activism as “the threat of unpopular ideas,” it seemed apt to ask a basic question about the title: Why should we come to think of reverence for life or serious concern for the Earth that sustains us as “unpopular ideas”? What we really appear to be saying is that the methods used, condoned, or promoted by certain people are unpopular. So before we proceed further, intimidation should be disaggregated from respect for the environment and its living inhabitants. Two recent and high-profile law-enforcement initiatives have viewed environmental and animal-advocacy groups as threats in the United States. These initiatives are the Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC) prosecution and Operation Backfire. The former prosecution targeted SHAC—a campaign to close one animal-testing firm—and referred also to the underground Animal Liberation Front (ALF).1 The latter prosecution *. Legal director of Friends of Animals, an international animal-rights organization founded in 1957. †. Lee Hall, who can be reached at [email protected], thanks Lydia Fiedler, the Vermont Law School, and Friends of Animals for making it possible to participate in the 2008 Symposium and prepare this Article for publication. 1. See Indictment at 14–16, United States v. Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty USA, Inc., No. 3:04-cr-00373-AET-2 (D.N.J. May 27, 2004), available at http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nj/press/files/ pdffiles/shacind.pdf (last visited Apr.
    [Show full text]
  • Smithkline Beecham & Others V Avery & Webb QBD 27 Apr 2007
    Neutral Citation Number: [2007] EWHC 948 (QB) Case No: HQ07X01122 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 27/04/2007 Before : MR. JUSTICE TEARE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : SMITHKLINE BEECHAM PLC Claimants BEECHAM GROUP PLC THE WELLCOME FOUNDATION LIMITED GLAXO OPERATIONS UK LIMITED GLAXO GROUP LIMITED GLAXOSMITHKLINE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LIMITED GLAXO PROPERTIES LIMITED SMITH KLINE & FRENCH LABORATORIES LIMITED DEALCYBER LIMITED GLAXO FINANCE BERMUDA LIMITED GLAXO WELLCOME UK LIMITED WILLIAM FREDERICK TRUNDLEY for and on behalf of the Protected Persons (as defined) and GREG AVERY as representing all persons acting Defendants as members, participants or supporters or in the name of the unincorporated association known as Stop Huntingdon Cruelty (“SHAC”) ROBIN WEBB as representing all persons acting as members, participants or supporters or in the name of the unincorporated association known as the Animal Liberation Front (“ALF”) Paul Girolami QC (instructed by GlaxoSmithKline Legal Department) for the Claimants Greg Avery in person and by his litigation friend Dr.Max Gastone Hearing dates: 18 April 2007 MR.JUSTICE TEARE GlaxoSmithKline v SHAC and ALF Approved Judgment Mr. Justice Teare: 1. The Claimants are customers of Huntingdon Life Sciences (HLS). They fear that unless restrained those who protest against the work done by HLS and their customers will harass their employees. On this application the Claimants seek an order continuing a restraining order granted by Beatson J. on 4 April 2007 without notice. The First Defendant represented himself with the assistance of Dr. Max Gastone. The Second Defendant did not appear and was not represented.
    [Show full text]
  • Anarchism and Animal Liberation
    Anarchism and Animal Liberation Anarchism and Animal Liberation Essays on Complementary Elements of Total Liberation Edited by Anthony J. Nocella II, Richard J. White and Erika Cudworth Forewords by David N. Pellow and John C. Alessio McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers Jefferson, North Carolina LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGUING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA Xxxxxx, Xxxxx, 19xx– Xxxxxxxx : xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxx / Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-7864-9457-6 (softcover : acid free paper) ♾ ISBN 978-1-4766-2132-6 (ebook) 1. xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx—xxxx xxxxxxx BRITISH LIBRARY CATALOGUING DATA ARE AVAILABLE © 2015 Anthony J. Nocella II, Richard J. White and Erika Cudworth. All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying or recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Cover image: George Tsartsianidis/Thinkstock Printed in the United States of America McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers Box 611, Jefferson, North Carolina 28640 www.mcfarlandpub.com To all those who continue to struggle toward an anarchist society: a society of non- violence, compassion, respect and liberty for all animals, both human and nonhuman. We will always be indebted to those who have sacrificed their own freedom and futures by confronting those forms of oppression, domination and rule that bring immeasurable pain, misery and suffering into the world. Acknowledgments Anthony, Richard and Erika would like to thank everyone who assisted in the production and publish- ing of this book. Special mention must go to David N.
    [Show full text]
  • Christianity and Vegetarianism 1809 – 2009
    EDEN’S DIET: CHRISTIANITY AND VEGETARIANISM 1809 – 2009 by SAMANTHA JANE CALVERT A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Theology and Religion School of Philosophy, Theology and Religion College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham June 2012 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The vegetarian teachings of the Salvation Army, Quakers, the Seventh Day Adventists and other Christian groups have been largely neglected by academics. This study takes a prosopographical approach to the development of modern Christian vegetarianism across a number of Christian vegetarian sects, and some more mainstream traditions, over a period of two centuries. The method allows for important points of similarity and difference to be noted among these groups’ founders and members. This research contributes particularly to radical Christian groups’ place in the vegetarian movement’s modern history. This study demonstrates how and why Christian vegetarianism developed in the nineteenth century and to what extent it influenced the secular vegetarian movement and wider society. It contextualizes nineteenth-century Christian vegetarianism in the wider movement of temperance, and considers why vegetarianism never made inroads into mainstream churches in the way that the temperance movement did.
    [Show full text]
  • Not Quite Terrorism. Animal Rights Extremism in the United Kingdom
    This article was downloaded by: [Vienna University Library] On: 12 October 2013, At: 14:33 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Studies in Conflict & Terrorism Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/uter20 Not Quite Terrorism: Animal Rights Extremism in the United Kingdom Rachel Monaghana a School of Criminology, Politics and Social Policy, University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland Accepted author version posted online: 25 Aug 2013.Published online: 11 Oct 2013. To cite this article: Rachel Monaghan (2013) Not Quite Terrorism: Animal Rights Extremism in the United Kingdom, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 36:11, 933-951, DOI: 10.1080/1057610X.2013.832117 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2013.832117 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
    [Show full text]
  • Jouranimallawvol1 P151.Pdf
    I FOUGHT THE LAW: A REVIEW OF TERRORISTS OR FREEDOM FIGHTERS?: REFLECTIONS ON THE LIBERATION OF ANIMALS, EDITED BY STEVEN BEST & ANTHONY J. NOCELLA II MATTHEW LIEBMAN1 Compassion and emotion are our most important safety values. If we lose them, Then we lose the vitality of life itself. Emotional? Hooligans? Cranks? —Conflict, This is the A.L.F.2 I. INTRODUCTION On April 23, 2004, police officers raided an animal rights conference at Syracuse University and arrested Sarahjane Blum in front of a crowd of animal rights activists and scholars. Blum was charged with felony burglary, and faced up to seven years in prison. Her crime: trespassing at the Hudson Valley Foie Gras factory farm; the purloined items: several miserable ducks. The arrest came immediately after Blum’s screening of Delicacy of Despair, an investigative documentary that details her open rescue (“burglary”) of ducks from Hudson Valley.3 Just over a month later, on May 26, 2004, fifteen FBI agents kicked down the door of a small house in the sleepy California town of Pinole, and, with guns drawn and Federal Air Marshals circling in helicopters, arrested Kevin Jonas, Lauren Gazzola, and Jacob Conroy, three activists associated with the campaign against the animal testing company Huntingdon Life 1 © Matthew Liebman 2004. J.D. Candidate, 2006, Stanford Law School. The author wishes to thank Salena for being there; Ashleigh, Oliver, Emma, Spider, and Anais for constant companionship; Ruthie and Richard for inspiration; and Jeremy for understanding. This review is dedicated to the brave activists, legal and otherwise, who commit their lives to defending animals, as well as to the memory of Chaplin (1994-1999), who introduced me to this struggle.
    [Show full text]
  • Extremism in the Animal Rights and Environmentalist Movements
    Ecoterrorism: Extremism in the Animal Rights and Environmentalist Movements This document is an archived copy of an older ADL report and may not reflect the most current facts or developments related to its subject matter. During the past two decades, radical environmental and animal rights groups have claimed responsibility for hundreds of crimes and acts of terrorism, including arson, bombings, vandalism and harassment, causing more than $100 million in damage. While some activists have been captured, ecoterror cells - small and loosely affiliated - are extremely difficult to identify and most attacks remain unsolved. Although it has been overshadowed by Islamic terrorist threats since September 11, ecoterrorism remains one of the country's most active terrorist movements. QUICK PROFILE Origins: 1970s Prominent Groups: Animal Liberation Front (ALF), Earth Liberation Front (ELF), Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC) Influential Personalities: Craig Rosebraugh, Kevin Kjonaas, Rod Coronado, Robin Webb, Leslie James Pickering, Josh Harper, David Barbarash, Dave Foreman, Ronnie Lee Aim: To end the exploitation of animals and the destruction of the environment, typically by causing damage to the operations of companies in related industries or terrorizing executives and employees of these and associated companies. 1 / 40 Media: No Compromise, Earth First! Journal, Green Anarchy, Bite Back Magazine, many Web sites Influences: Mainstream animal and environmental welfare groups, anarchists Criminal Activity: Arson, bombing, harassment, vandalism, animal release Introduction In recent years, an increasing amount of terrorist activity in the United States has been carried out in the name of animal and environmental protection. Automobile dealerships, housing developments, forestry companies, corporate and university- based medical research laboratories, restaurants, fur farms and other industries are targeted across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Reports of the Interim Joint, Special, and Statutory Committees 2013
    Final Reports of the Interim Joint, Special, and Statutory Committees 2013 Informational Bulletin No. 243 Legislative Research Commission Frankfort, Kentucky December 2013 Final Reports of the Interim Joint, Special, and Statutory Committees 2013 Presented to the Legislative Research Commission and the 2014 Regular Session of the Kentucky General Assembly Informational Bulletin No. 243 Legislative Research Commission Frankfort, Kentucky lrc.ky.gov December 2013 Paid for with state funds. Available in alternative format by request. Legislative Research Commission Foreword 2013 Final Committee Reports Foreword Sections 36 and 42 of the Kentucky Constitution provide that the General Assembly shall meet on the “first Tuesday after the first Monday in January” for 60 legislative days in even- numbered years, and for 30 legislative days, including up to 10 days for an organizational component, in odd-numbered years. Between legislative sessions, the interim joint committees of the Legislative Research Commission (LRC), as well as special and statutory committees, meet to discuss and receive testimony on a number of important issues that may confront the General Assembly. During the 2013 Interim, all 15 interim joint committees held meetings. Two special committees met in 2013. Seven of the nine statutory committees met during the 2013 Interim. LRC provides this informational booklet as a summary of the activity of the interim joint, special, and statutory committees since adjournment of the 2013 General Assembly. The reports were prepared separately
    [Show full text]
  • Colin Blakemore
    COLIN BLAKEMORE Colin Blakemore (born 1944) is a British neurobiologist at Oxford University and Warwick University specializing in vision and development of the brain. He was formerly chief executive of the British Medical Research Council (MRC). He is best known to the public as a communicator of science but also as the target of a long-running animal-rights campaign. According to The Observer, he has been both "one of the most powerful scientists in the [UK]" and "a hate figure for the animal rights movement" Background Born in Stratford-upon-Avon in 1944, he was educated at King Henry VIII School in Coventry and then won a state scholarship to Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, England, where he gained a first-class degree in medical sciences, then completed his doctoral studies at the University of California, Berkeley, USA as a Harkness Fellow. He returned to join the faculty at Cambridge, before moving to the University of Oxford at the age of 35 to become Waynflete Professor of Physiology and a Fellow of Magdalen College. Colin Blakemore was director of the James S. McDonnell and MRC Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience at Oxford for eight years. He has served as president of the Biosciences Federation (now the Society of Biology), the British Neuroscience Association and the Physiological Society, and as president and chairman of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (now the British Science Association). He is a Fellow of the Royal Society, the Academy of Medical Sciences and Academia Europaea, and an Honorary Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians, the British Pharmacological Society, the Society of Biology and Corpus Christi and Downing Colleges in Cambridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Decades of Disobedience: a Retrospective on Green Anarchist's
    Two Decades of Disobedience: A retrospective on Green Anarchist’s first twenty years John Connor 2004 Contents Our Origins .................................. 3 The Hunt Years ................................ 4 The 4th Collective .............................. 5 The Gandalf Trial .............................. 6 The Home Clones .............................. 11 Splits and Schisms .............................. 14 Current Issues ................................ 16 2 Few anarchist publications survive to their 20th year, and then typically spoil it by resounding triumphant about their minuscule ‘great achievements’. At risk of sounding pious, it is not our role as revolutionaries to holiday from criticism — especially essential selfcriticism — or to publish propaganda, which implies an un- equal, manipulative relationship between writer and reader. Like the Trotskyites of yore, there are ‘Walter Mittys’ in the movement that go over the in-house press with a fine-toothed comb for any portent — however tiny or obscure — oftheir imminent ‘achievement of historical destiny’, a tendency that actually only empha- sises their risible, self-deluded megalomania and pathetic insignificance. For all the postSeattle myth-making, Leviathan’s enemies have achieved little on global terms, so it is more appropriate to present ourselves with modest humility, as learners rather than teachers. Our Origins London Greenpeace presented the Easter 1984 Stop the City (STC) as a forerun- ner to such anti-globalisation spectacles as J18. With hindsight, this is nothing to boast about and GA’s role in it less so. As others were penned outside the Bank of England trading smoke flares with the Met, veteran Freedom columnist and owner of the Keverall Farm organic commune Alan Albon and a young Green CND herbalist Marcus Christo met in a nearby pub, quietly agreeing to found a “green” anarchist publication to join the Green wave of the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncovering the Animal Liberation Front
    Reprinted from the ALF Primer Behind the Mask: Uncovering the Animal To liberate animals from places of abuse, i.e., laboratories, factory Liberation Front farms, fur farms, etc., and place them in good homes where they may live out their natural lives, free from suffering. To inflict economic damage to those who profit from the misery and exploitation of animals. To reveal the horror and atrocities committed against animals behind locked doors, by performing nonviolent direct actions and lib- erations. The world only goes forward because of those who oppose To take all necessary precautions against harming any animal, it.-Goethe human and nonhuman. Any group of people who are vegetarians or vegans and who carry But if you have no relationship with the living things on this out actions according to ALF guidelines have the right to regard them- earth, you may lose whatever relationship you have with selves as part of the ALE humanity-Krishnamurti On September 11, 2001, the political landscape changed dramati- cally. Instantaneously, it became unpatriotic to criticize President Bush, the government, or US policy on any front. Activist groups like the Sierra Club announced that they were indefinitely suspending all criti- cism against Bush's pro-corporate agenda as the narion tried to pull together. Without question, there were real enemies outside our conti- nent to be wary of, but the government exaggerated the threat as it began to identify imaginary enemies within. The "war on terrorism" quickly became an attack on civil liberties, free speech, and domestic dissent. While flags waved everywhere, the Bush administration was gutting freedoms and shredding the Constitution, moving America ever closer to tyranny.
    [Show full text]
  • Not Quite Terrorism: Animal Rights Extremism in the United Kingdom
    Not Quite Terrorism: Animal Rights Extremism in the United Kingdom Rachel Monaghan Author post-print (accepted) deposited by Coventry University’s Repository Original citation & hyperlink: Monaghan, Rachel. "Not quite terrorism: Animal rights extremism in the United Kingdom." Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 36.11 (2013): 933-951. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2013.832117 ISSN - 1057-610X Publisher: Taylor and Francis This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Studies in Conflict & Terrorism on 23rd August 2013, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1057610X.2013.832117 Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. This document is the author’s post-print version, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer-review process. Some differences between the published version and this version may remain and you are advised to consult the published version if you wish to cite from it. Not Quite Terrorism Title: Not quite terrorism – animal rights extremism in the United Kingdom Author: Dr Rachel Monaghan Not quite terrorism – animal rights extremism in the United Kingdom Political violence undertaken in the name of animal rights has been ongoing for some 35 years in the United Kingdom and yet such activity is commonly termed extremism not terrorism.
    [Show full text]