DOCSLIB.ORG

Important Bird Area Conservation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Important Bird Area Conservation Plan _______________________________________________________________________ IMPORTANT BIRD AREA CONSERVATION PLAN NAUGATUCK STATE FOREST- East and West Blocks ________________________________________________________________________ February 2012 Prepared by: Buzz Devine Ornithologist Plymouth, CT Dedication The Naugatuck State Forest Important Bird Area Conservation Plan is dedicated to the memory of Ed Jurzynski, a Beacon Falls resident and active member of the Naugatuck Valley Audubon Society, who worked tirelessly in his efforts to see the Naugatuck State Forest recognized as an IBA. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This plan was written with the assistance of several key individuals. Kate Elsishans provided expertise with design and construction of the more complex tables and assisted with research. Staff from The Connecticut State Library, and particularly, Denise Jernigan, was very helpful tracking down historical documents related to the Naugatuck River Valley. Wendy Howes reviewed and edited much of the earlier draft and provided numerous suggestions to improve the overall format and content, and Denise Jernigan did a final review. Geographic information and mapping was prepared by Kate Moran, GISP. Numerous individuals from the Connecticut Department of Environment Protection (CTDEP) supplied technical information within their specific areas of regulatory, wildlife, or fisheries expertise. These individuals include: Karen Zyko, Dawn McKay, Jenny Dickson, Laurie Saucier, Peter Picone, and Shannon Kearney-McGee of the Wildlife Division; Paul Hassler of the Waste Management Bureau; and, Tim Barry from the Inland Fisheries Division. Ms Kearney-McGee was particularly helpful supplying information and maps related to the Whip-poor-will research and avian surveys. Other CTDEP staff contributing information include: Donna Seresin, Carol Smith, Geoffrey Krukar, Min Huang, and Paul Rothbart. Several other individuals who answered questions are acknowledged directly in the text. Special acknowledgement must be given to Gerald Milne, CTDEP State Forester. Mr. Milne offered much assistance related to technical forestry issues; took time for several meetings; provided maps, documents, and other relevant information; answered numerous inquiries; and, reviewed the draft conservation plan. His help and assistance was invaluable to the successful completion of this project. Anthony (Tony) Johnson of Northeast Utilities provided a copy of the company’s management plan for the utility’s rights-of-way and was quite helpful answering questions about maintenance and management procedures. Roy Harvey was kind enough to provide a section of the Oxford Christmas Bird Count map presented in Appendix J. Gary Haine, Aquarion Water Company helped clarify historic information related to the Seymour Water Company and the reservoir property. A friend and former colleague, Tim Carr, Environmental Manager, GeoDesign LLC offered helpful suggestions and assistance with formatting and answered several questions related to geology of the area. Finally, Bill Moorhead’s extensive knowledge of Connecticut’s flora and critical habitats enlightened me with his expert assistance. Mr. Moorhead helped identify and/or confirmed the identification of numerous plants and several critical habitats found during site surveys. I also appreciate the stakeholders who responded to the IBA questionnaire and/or reviewed and commented on the draft Conservation Plan. Individuals answering the questionnaire included: Milan Bull, Connecticut Audubon; Greg Hanisek; Roy Harvey; Mark Szantyr; and, Sophie Zyla. Stakeholders providing comments related to plan review include: Audubon Connecticut; Bill Urban, Naugatuck Valley Audubon; Twan Leenders, Connecticut Audubon; Gerald Milne, CTDEP; Jeffery Ward, CT Agricultural Experiment Station; Greg Hanisek; Sophie Zyla; and Jeff Ruhloff. Anthony Zemba conducted the final peer review of the Conservation Plan, and offered extensive and thoughtful commentary, particularly on forestry issues. The author also acknowledge the assistance of Patrick Comins, Director of Bird Conservation, Audubon Connecticut, for his help and assistance during the early stages of the planning process and throughout the completion of the final product. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... viii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 THE IMPORTANT BIRD AREA PROGRAM ..................................................................................... 3 3.0 SITE BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Site Description ................................................................................................................................. 4 3.2 Historical Use .................................................................................................................................... 8 3.3 Abutting and Proximal Lands ......................................................................................................... 10 3.4 Stakeholders .................................................................................................................................... 12 4.0 NATURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY ............................................................................................. 16 4.1 Designation as an IBA .................................................................................................................... 16 4.2 Abiotic Features .............................................................................................................................. 16 4.2.1 Climate ..................................................................................................................................... 16 4.2.2 Topography .............................................................................................................................. 17 4.2.3 Water Features ......................................................................................................................... 18 4.2.4 Water Quality ........................................................................................................................... 18 4.2.5 Wastes Disposal Sites .............................................................................................................. 22 4.2.6 Bedrock Geology ..................................................................................................................... 22 4.2.7 Surficial Geology ..................................................................................................................... 23 4.2.8 Soils.......................................................................................................................................... 26 4.3 Land Use/Land Cover ..................................................................................................................... 26 4.4 Vegetation - Habitats and Natural Communities ............................................................................ 29 4.4.1 Forest Habitat ........................................................................................................................... 29 4.4.1.1 Deciduous Forest............................................................................................................... 33 4.4.1.2 Coniferous Forest ................................................................................................................ 34 4.4.2 Early Successional Habitats ..................................................................................................... 35 4.4.2.1 Grasslands ......................................................................................................................... 36 4.4.2.2 Shrublands ......................................................................................................................... 38 4.4.2.3 Forest Clearings and Wildlife Openings ........................................................................... 39 4.4.2.4 Rocky Summits and Outcrops (Barrens and Glades) ........................................................ 40 4.4.3 Lacustrine Systems - Reservoirs .............................................................................................. 43 4.4.4 Riverine Systems – Perennial and Intermittent Streams .......................................................... 45 4.4.5 Palustrine Systems - Wildlife Impoundment and Other Ponds ................................................ 46 4.4.6 Palustrine Systems - Vernal Pools, Wet Seeps, and Fire Ponds .............................................. 47 4.4.7 Palustrine Systems - Forested Wetland - Red Maple Swamp .................................................. 49 4.4.8 Palustrine Systems - Shrub Swamp Wetland ........................................................................... 50 4.5 Avian Species Information.............................................................................................................. 50 4.6 Avian Species Overview ................................................................................................................. 50 4.7 Avian Species of Conservation Priority or Concern ......................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2011 at a Glance Nonprofit Org
    FINANCIAL REPORT 2011 AT A GLANCE NONPROFIT ORG. U.S. POSTAGE HOUSATONIC VALLEY ASSOCIATION HOUSATONIC VALLEY ASSOCIATION, INC. AND HVA FOUNDATION, INC. The Housatonic Valley Association’s mission is to save the PAID PERMIT NO. 19 natural character and environmental health of our communities by CORNWALL BRIDGE HVA CONNECTICUT 2011 ANNUAL REPORT protecting land and water in the Housatonic River valley. Cornwall Bridge, CT 06754-0028 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2011 OF FINANCIAL POSITION JUNE 30, 2011 How we spent our THE HOUSATONIC WATERSHED TEMPORARILY PERMANENTLY ASSETS resources UNRESTRICTED RESTRICTED RESTRICTED TOTAL Current Assets Cash and Cash Equivalents $ 237,257 SUPPORT AND REVENUE Accounts Receivable 94,345 Membership Dues $ 52,294 $ - $ - $ 52,294 Prepaid Expenses 7,050 Massachusetts Contributions Above Dues 247,138 - - 247,138 __________ Grants 266,936 44,900 - 311,836 22% Total Current Assets __________338,652 HVA STAFF Events 191,462 - - 191,462 LAND PROTECTION Fees 21,169 - - 21,169 Lynn Werner BARON DAVID Executive Director Rent 10,292 - - 10,292 30% Investment Income 4,523 20,701 - 25,224 Property and Equipment MASSACHUSETTS Dennis Regan Donated Goods and Services 8,736 - - 8,736 Land 216,206 WATER Buildings and Renovations 306,414 Berkshire Program Director Unrealized Gains on Investments 51,718 99,294 - 151,012 PROTECTION Northern Furnishings and Equipment 166,848 ADMINISTRATIVE/ Alison Dixon Net Assets Release From Restrictions _________78,646 ___________(78,646)
    [Show full text]
  • United Way of Greater Waterbury Pledge Form Non‐Profit Agency Numbers
    United Way of Greater Waterbury Pledge Form Non‐Profit Agency Numbers United Way of Greater Waterbury's Partner Agencies CT United Ways (listed in order by city) 4044 American Red Cross Waterbury Area 3210 United Way of Coastal Fairfield County (Bridgeport) 8623 Boy Scouts of America CT Rivers Council (East Hartford) 2519 United Way of West Central CT (Bristol) 1503 Boys & Girls Club of Greater Waterbury (Waterbury) 3897 United Way of Western CT (Danbury) 4051 Catholic Charities Inc. (Waterbury) 2790 United Way of Southeastern CT, Inc. (Gales Ferry) 4887 Cheshire Community YMCA (Cheshire) 9118 Greenwich United Way (Greenwich) 4978 Children's Community School (Waterbury) 2485 United Way of Central & Northeastern CT (Hartford) 4077 CT Counseling Centers, Inc. (Waterbury) 4549 United Way of Meriden & Wallingford, Inc. (Meriden) 4085 CT Legal Services, Inc. (Waterbury) 4556 Middlesex United Way, Inc. (Middletown) 17392 Girl Scouts of CT (Waterbury) 4572 United Way of Milford (Milford) 4218 Girls Inc. of Western CT (Waterbury) 3905 United Way of Naugatuck & Beacon Falls, Inc. (Naugatuck) 4200 Greater Waterbury Interfaith Ministries Inc. (Waterbury) 7112 United Way of New Canaan, Inc. (New Canaan) 4234 Greater Waterbury YMCA (Waterbury) 4531 United Way of Greater New Haven (New Haven) 17335 Hartford Health Care Services (Watertown) 4598 United Way of Norwalk & Wilton, Inc. (Norwalk) 17350 Hispanic Coalition of Greater Waterbury (Waterbury) 4564 Valley United Way (Shelton) 4093 John J. Driscoll United Labor Agency (Waterbury) 2766 United Way of Southington, Inc. (Southington) 8409 Kangaroo's Korner, Inc. (Watertown) 2394 United Way of Northwest CT, Inc. (Torrington) 1537 Mental Health CT, Inc. (West Hartford) 9159 United Way of Westport-Weston, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Valley Now: a 2015 Snapshot 2
    Ansonia Beacon Falls The Valley Now: Derby Naugatuck Oxford A 2015 Snapshot Seymour Shelton About this Report For nearly 20 years, the Valley has come together to collect quality of life data throughout the region including the Healthy Valley Report in 1996, the Mt. Auburn Report in 2001, the Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center’s Community Health Profile and the Valley Cares Report in 2010. Early in 2014, the Valley Council for Naugatuck Health & Human Services approached the Valley Community Foundation (VCF) with a request to fund an update to the Valley Cares Report. In mid 2014, VCF initiated community conversations to discuss the need for a common-source document which would expand the scope of Beacon the Valley Cares Report and provide a comprehensive review of Falls demographic, economic, health and education issues shaping the Oxford Valley communities. An advisory committee was formed in the fall comprised of key stakeholders and nonprofit organizations to discuss critical focus areas affecting the Valley community and to define the scope of a baseline report. VCF committed financial resources to support the collection of the data and the production of this baseline Seymour indicators report as the first step in its strategic initiative work. The towns of Beacon Falls and Naugatuck were added as a result of their interest in participating in this collaboration and their inclusion in the region’s recognition for the All-American City Award in 2000. These communities Ansonia were added to the five core Valley towns of Ansonia, Derby, Oxford, Seymour and Shelton. Derby This report represents the start of a multi-year process, which will culminate in 2016 with a comprehensive study on the demographic, Shelton economic, education, health and housing trends within the region.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2012 #119
    January 2012 #119 www.nemba.org SSingleingleTTrackS NEMBA, the New England Mountain Bike January 2012, Number 119 Association, is a non-profit 501 (c) (3) organi- zation dedicated to promoting trail access, maintaining trails open for mountain bicyclists, and educating mountain bicyclists to use these trails sensitively and responsibly. Cape Cod, Exit 7 SingleTracks is published six times a year by the Are your trails snowbound? Maybe it’s time for a New England Mountain Bike Association for road trip to Cape Cod. Willow Street, AKA, Exit 7 is the trail community. one of the best rides on the Cape. By Bill Boles. ©SingleTracks Editor & Publisher: Philip Keyes Contributing Writers: Bill Boles, Jeff Cutler, Thom Parsons 10 Cartoonist: Philippe Guillerm Copy Editor: Nanyee Keyes Executive Director: Philip Keyes [email protected] NEMBA 8 PO Box 2221 Acton MA 01720 Board of Directors Harold Green, President Adam Glick, Vice-President The Ultimate Road Trip Matt Schulde, Vice-President Anne Shepard, Treasurer Glenn and Paula’s excellent adventure took them on great sin- Tom Grimble, Secretary gletracks across the US of A, from Michigan to Park City. Read all about them! By Glenn Vernes and Paula Burton Rob Adair, White Mountains NEMBA Brian Alexander, CeMeNEMBA John Anders, Midcoast Maine NEMBA John Barley, White Mountains NEMBA Matt Bowser, Central NH NEMBA Eammon Carleton, BV NEMBA Matt Caron, Southern NH NEMBA SingleTracks Hey, get creative! We wel- Steve Cobble, SE MA NEMBA come submissions, photos and artwork. This is Leo Corrigan, RI NEMBA Peter DeSantis, Southern NH NEMBA your forum and your magazine. Be nice, and Adam Glick, Greater Boston NEMBA Paper Trail share! David Hughes, Carrabassett Region NEMBA On the Cover: Todd Swinton mountain biking Steve LaFlame, Central NH NEMBA Frank Lane, NS NEMBA Letters — 6 in the Fore River Sanctuary, Portland Maine.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with Birds Observed Off-Campus During BIOL3400 Field Course
    Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with birds observed off-campus during BIOL3400 Field course Photo Credit: Talton Cooper Species Descriptions and Photos by students of BIOL3400 Edited by Troy A. Ladine Photo Credit: Kenneth Anding Links to Tables, Figures, and Species accounts for birds observed during May-term course or winter bird counts. Figure 1. Location of Environmental Studies Area Table. 1. Number of species and number of days observing birds during the field course from 2005 to 2016 and annual statistics. Table 2. Compilation of species observed during May 2005 - 2016 on campus and off-campus. Table 3. Number of days, by year, species have been observed on the campus of ETBU. Table 4. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during the off-campus trips. Table 5. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during a winter count of birds on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Table 6. Species observed from 1 September to 1 October 2009 on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Alphabetical Listing of Birds with authors of accounts and photographers . A Acadian Flycatcher B Anhinga B Belted Kingfisher Alder Flycatcher Bald Eagle Travis W. Sammons American Bittern Shane Kelehan Bewick's Wren Lynlea Hansen Rusty Collier Black Phoebe American Coot Leslie Fletcher Black-throated Blue Warbler Jordan Bartlett Jovana Nieto Jacob Stone American Crow Baltimore Oriole Black Vulture Zane Gruznina Pete Fitzsimmons Jeremy Alexander Darius Roberts George Plumlee Blair Brown Rachel Hastie Janae Wineland Brent Lewis American Goldfinch Barn Swallow Keely Schlabs Kathleen Santanello Katy Gifford Black-and-white Warbler Matthew Armendarez Jordan Brewer Sheridan A.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Warblers of Lake County (Field Guide)
    Wood of Lake County An educational wildlife pamphlet provided by the Lake County Public Resources Department Parks & Trails Division 2 The Lake County Public Resources Department, Parks & Trails Division, manages more than three dozen parks, preserves and boat ramps. Lake County park rangers lead regularly scheduled nature in some of these parks. In partnership with the Lake County hikes, bird and butterfly surveys and other outdoor adventures Water Authority, Parks & Trails also schedules guided paddling adventures. For a listing of Lake County parks and events, call 352-253-4950, email [email protected] or visit Forwww.lakecountyfl.gov/parks. more information about birds that can be seen in Lake County, or bookstores. Information on birds is also available online at the check out a field guide to birds available at many local libraries Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, www.birds.cornell.edu. Bird watchers in Florida tend to bring a little more on their trips than their Northern peers. While the average temperature in Lake County is a mild 72°F, the summer months in Central Florida can be steamy. Outside enthusiasts are always encouraged to carry sunscreen to protect skin from sunburn, insect repellent to ward off mosquitoes and plenty of water to avoid dehydration. Sunscreen should be 15 SPF or higher and applied 20 minutes before. 3 Park rangers recommend these six popular comprehensive guides: • A Field Guide to the Birds, Eastern and Central North America (Fourth Edition, 1980, Roger Tory Peterson) • Stokes Field Guide to Birds, Eastern Region (First Edition, 1996, Donald and Lillian Stokes) • All the Birds of North America (First Edition, 1997, The American Bird Conservancy) • Field Guide to the Birds of North America (Fourth Edition, 2002, The National Geographic Society) • Focus Guide to the Birds of North America (First Edition, 2000, Kenn Kaufman) • The Sibley Guide to Birds (First Edition, 2000, David Allen Sibley) Insect repellent should contain DEET.
    [Show full text]
  • Pheasant Hunting in Connecticut Changes in 2017
    Pheasant Hunting in Connecticut Changes in 2017: This year, the DEEP will purchase a total of 15,000 adult pheasants. This year 7-8 areas will be stocked on Saturday morning and afternoon and will only be open to hunters with a Saturday a.m. (9 am -12 noon) or Saturday p.m. (1:30 pm - 4:30 pm) permit. These select areas will be stocked prior to the morning permit and during the afternoon break to assure hunters that birds will be available at these areas on the weekend. These areas will include: Cromwell Meadows WMA, Durham Meadows WMA, Housatonic WMA, Nathan Hale State Forest, Naugatuck State Forest (Hunter's Mountain Block only), Simsbury WMA and Skiff Mountain Coop WMA. All hunters wishing to use these areas on Saturdays must have a Saturday permit and will only be able to be present during the specified time on the daily permit. Saturday permits for these areas will only be available on the Online Sportsmen Licensing System the Monday preceding the Saturday hunts starting at 12:01 am. As in past years, the third week of November (13th - 18th) will be an abbreviated week. During that week birds will only be released in the beginning of the week at all areas except: Cromwell Meadows, Durham Meadows WMA, East Windsor/Enfield PR Area, Higganum Meadows WMA, Housatonic WMA, Mansfield Hollow, MDC New Hartford, Simsbury WMA, Suffield WMA and Thomaston Dam. CONNECTICUT RESIDENT GAME BIRD CONSERVATION STAMP: All pheasant hunters must purchase a Resident Game Bird Conservation Stamp, along with a hunting license.
    [Show full text]
  • State Forest Management Plan for Naugatuck State Forest
    DEEP Division of Forestry Naugatuck SF. Mt. Sanford Block Management Plan 2013-2023 A. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 2 B. History ........................................................................................................................................ 2 C. Acres and Access ........................................................................................................................ 3 D. Special Use Areas........................................................................................................................ 5 E. Extensive Areas of Concern ........................................................................................................ 7 F. Wildlife Habitat (compiled with assistance from Peter Picone) ................................................... 8 H. Landscape Context ................................................................................................................... 13 I. Specific Land Acquisition Desires ............................................................................................ 14 J. Public Involvement .................................................................................................................. 14 K. Adaptive Management ............................................................................................................. 14 L. 10-Year Goals ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • News Notes Conserving the Land, Trails and Natural Resources of Connecticut Since 1895
    NEWSLETTER OF THE CONNECTICUT FOREST PARK ASSOCIATION CFPANews Notes Conserving the land, trails and natural resources of Connecticut since 1895. Winter 2008 Volume 1 Issue #2 Annual Fund Easier than Trail Mix CFPA wants you! Ever to Support Many Hands on the (to volunteer for special CFPA kicks off our 2008 Trails, Annual Awards events). Eastern Annual Fund with to Trail Managers, and Mountain Sports easier donation options tally of Trail hours. provides CFPA Club Day than ever before. Page 4-5 benefits to members. From the Executive Wedding Bells & Happy Page 5 Director’s Desk Trails brings support to CFPA’s Image Problem. CFPA. Giving options WalkCT Gains Ground Staff updates - Awards abound. New program makes and new family. Page 3 strides to connect you Page 2 with good hikes. Page 6 Conservation Center. For several years influence Connecticut’s forest resources, Partnership at after the 1964 gift, CFPA was contracted either now or in the future. Forest by the state to operate the educational landowners, foresters and loggers, scout Goodwin Center center. In 2005, after 2+ years of and other youth groups, and municipal Renewed minimal activity at the Center, we were commissioners are some key examples. instrumental in forming the “Goodwin The foundation of the Center’s On October 1, CFPA opened a new Collaborative”: a 3-way partnership educational programs is demonstration: chapter in educational partnership when on-the-ground examples of good forest we officially began directing programs and wildlife stewardship put in place at the Goodwin Forest Conservation and documented. These demonstrations Education Center in Hampton, CT.
    [Show full text]
  • Macgillivrays Warbler
    Wyoming Species Account MacGillivray’s Warbler Geothlypis tolmiei REGULATORY STATUS USFWS: Migratory Bird USFS R2: No special status USFS R4: No special status Wyoming BLM: No special status State of Wyoming: Protected Bird CONSERVATION RANKS USFWS: No special status WGFD: NSS4 (Bc), Tier II WYNDD: G5, S4 Wyoming Contribution: LOW IUCN: Least Concern PIF Continental Concern Score: 11 STATUS AND RANK COMMENTS MacGillivray’s Warbler (Geothlypis tolmiei) does not have any additional regulatory status or conservation rank considerations beyond those listed above. NATURAL HISTORY Taxonomy: Two subspecies of MacGillivray’s Warbler are recognized and known to breed in the United States: G. t. tolmiei and G. t. monticola 1. In Wyoming, G. t. monticola is the known subspecies; it breeds east of the Pacific slope, in the Rocky Mountains and Great Basin, and winters in higher elevations of central and southern Mexico, occasionally in southern California 2, 3. Two additional subspecies of G. tolmiei are not recognized by the American Ornithologists’ Union (AOU): G. t. intermedia and G. t. austinsmithi. The distinguishing characteristic is reported to be a shorter tail length in G. t. austinsmithi and there are specimens of said subspecies from western Wyoming 1, 4. Recent molecular phylogeny efforts concluded that MacGillivray’s Warbler is more closely related to the genus Geothlypis 5. The AOU approved the genus change in 2011 6. Prior to this, the species was placed in the genus Oporornis. Description: The species is a small wood-warbler in the Parulidae Family. MacGillivray’s Warbler is identifiable in the field during the breeding season. Male upperparts are olive green and underparts are yellow.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Juvenile Warblers the Fun Really Begins Here
    FEATURED PHOTO Identifying Juvenile Warblers The Fun Really Begins Here Peter Pyle • Bolinas, California • [email protected] Christine M. Godwin • Fort McMurray, Alberta • [email protected] Kenneth R. Foster • Fort McMurray, Alberta • [email protected] he Monitoring Avian Productivity and Survivorship (MAPS) other areas, are now available online (tinyurl.com/land-birds- TProgram is a continent-wide collaborative effort among re- vital and see DeSante et al. 2015). searchers and citizen scientists to assist the conservation In 2011 the Boreal MAPS Program was initiated in northeast- of birds and their habitats through bird banding (tinyurl.com/ ern Alberta to evaluate landbird demographic rates in reclaimed MAPS-banding). Since 1989, more than 1,200 MAPS banding habitats and other habitats subjected to varying levels of dis- stations, spread across North America, have recorded more than turbance relative to those in natural boreal forests (Foster et al. 2 million bird captures. MAPS data enable assessment of avian 2012). Few demographic data on landbirds have been collected demographic vital rates such as productivity, recruitment, sur- in the boreal forest (Wells 2011), making this program an im- vival, and intrinsic population growth, and these supplement portant contributor to understanding bird populations and vital other monitoring data by providing insights into what factors rates from local to continental scales. During July of our first drive avian population declines. For example, low productivity field season we began to catch recently fledged juvenile wood- indicates problems are occurring on breeding grounds whereas warblers (family Parulidae) in the mist nets. Frankly, we had a low survival suggests problems are occurring on winter grounds very difficult time, at first, with their identification.
    [Show full text]
  • Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Update
    SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN UPDATE Submitted for: FINAL South Central Region Council of Governments June 2017 Submitted by: South Central Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan Update 1 4 9 This page has been intentionally left blank. 10 14 14 15 18 22 23 25 30 63 64 65 87 88 92 94 98 2 South Central Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan Update TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 II. INTRODUCTION 9 A. The Value of Bicycling and Walking 10 B. Plan Purpose 14 C. Planning Process 14 D. Community Outreach 15 III. VISION, GOALS & ACTION STRATEGIES 18 IV. BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL 22 A. Statewide Overview 23 B. Regional Overview 25 C. Municipal Overview 30 V. SAFETY & CRASH ANALYSIS 63 A. Methodology 64 B. Findings 65 VI. RECOMMENDATIONS 87 A. On-Road Priority Areas 88 B. Off-Road Priority Areas 92 C. Design Recommendations 94 D. Policy Recommendations 98 South Central Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan Update 3 South Central Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan Update Chapter I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 South Central Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan Update Chapter II introduces the South Central The vision is stated as: Each goal includes a number of action Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan Update strategies that propose specific ways in which (Regional Plan Update). It describes SCRCOG and its member municipalities the goals could be implemented. the importance of bicycling and walking will encourage, promote; and continue as modes of active, or human-powered, to improve the conditions for bicycling, transportation. Some of the valuable benefits walking, and other forms of active of active transportation and its associated transportation, so that any person, infrastructure include: regardless of age, ability, or income will be able to walk, bicycle, or use other types • Healthy living – walking and bicycling of active transportation modes safely and promote good health conveniently throughout the Region.
    [Show full text]