Master Thesis Christianne Wisse

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Master Thesis Christianne Wisse Eindhoven University of Technology MASTER A repairable spare parts management strategy for the Royal Netherlands Air Force Wisse, C. Award date: 2017 Link to publication Disclaimer This document contains a student thesis (bachelor's or master's), as authored by a student at Eindhoven University of Technology. Student theses are made available in the TU/e repository upon obtaining the required degree. The grade received is not published on the document as presented in the repository. The required complexity or quality of research of student theses may vary by program, and the required minimum study period may vary in duration. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain Hoogerheide, August 2017 A Repairable Spare Parts Management Strategy for the Royal Netherlands Air Force By C. Wisse BSc Industrial Engineering Student identity number 0808994 In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science In Operations Management and Logistics Supervisors : Dr. T. Tan, TU/e, OPAC Dr. Ir. J.J. Arts, TU/e, OPAC Prof. Dr. Ir. G.J.J.A.N. van Houtum, TU/e, OPAC Second Lieutenant Ing. L.W.F. Koops, Royal Netherlands Air Force TUE. Department of Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences Series Master Theses Operations Management and Logistics Subject headings: spare parts; static scheduling; dynamic scheduling; discrete event simulation; inventory control It should be noted that the numbers used in this report are fictitious and serve only for illustrative purposes due to confidentiality reasons. I ABSTRACT This research has been conducted in collaboration with the RNLAF. Stakeholders at the RNLAF indicate that orders at the component repair shop are currently scheduled inefficient, which causes longer lead times and thus higher inventory levels. The objective of this research is to identify scheduling rules and to study their effect in repairable inventory systems. Furthermore, we aim to optimize the base stock levels based on the optimal scheduling rule, i.e. we jointly optimize the base stock levels and the real-time scheduling decisions. Therefore, we modeled a M/M/1 queueing system that evaluates the aggregate mean number of backorders for a given base stock vector and scheduling rule. Then, for each constraint on the aggregate mean number of backorders, optimized base stock levels follow from Lagrangian relaxation and Newsvendor equations. We conclude that the optimal scheduling rule over all cases has the following main characteristics: - Takes into account the stochasticity of the arrival process. - Takes into account the average processing time of a SKU. - Takes into account the real-time stock levels of SKU’s. We show that the Myopic Allocation rule meets all these characteristics and outperforms the other scheduling rules in almost all cases. II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document contains the results of a master thesis project carried out at the Royal Netherlands Air Force. Most assets used by the RNLAF are expensive and consist of technologically advanced systems. A high availability of these assets is desired, since the assets are used to protect the country and during military missions. Since the development of these assets is very costly and time consuming, repairing an asset is preferred instead of purchasing an entire new one. To achieve a high availability of the assets, orders are placed at 981 SQN, which is the component repair shop of the RNLAF. The lead time of a component is highly dependent of the route through the repair shop, the capacity of operators, machines, test equipment and the availability of lower level SRU’s. Therefore, to optimize the lead time of a component, the capacity of the repair shop needs to be used optimally and the repair process needs to be controlled as good as possible. The repairable spare part inventory and scheduling methodology that is currently used at the RNLAF is mainly based on the experiences of employees instead of on specified control rules. According to stakeholders, orders are currently scheduled inefficient due to this method. Therefore, the objective of this research is to identify scheduling rules and to study their effect in repairable inventory systems. Furthermore, we aim to optimize the base stock levels based on the optimal scheduling rule, i.e. we jointly optimize the base stock levels and the real-time scheduling decisions. We design a conceptual integrated model which aims to minimize investment costs subject to a constraint on the aggregate mean number of backorders. This thesis contributes both to science and to industry. Despite the fact that Adan et al. (2009), Tiemessen and van Houtum (2010), and Tiemessen and van Houtum (2013) suggest that research needs to be done to jointly optimize dynamic priority rules and base stock levels, it has not been investigated yet. Besides, the already existing method of jointly optimizing static priority rules and base stock levels is extended the possibility of having different processing times for each SKU. Finally, we design scheduling rules especially for repair shops with high material and capacity uncertainty, which are evaluated in our model. This thesis also contributes to industry, since highly expensive spare parts and high material and capacity complexity are common in the aviation industry. Therefore, the contributions of this research also apply for other parties in this industry. MODEL FORMULATION We consider a M/M/1 queueing system with a stock point that keeps multiple repairable spare parts on stock to serve a set of technical systems in a certain region. The stock point keeps repairable SKU’s and we have repair by replacement. To formulate the model, we made the following assumptions: - All parts are critical - For each SKU, the number of part failures in the installed base occurs according to a Poisson process with a constant rate - We model the repair facility as a single exponential server - Processing times of all SKU’s are exponentially distributed and mutually independent - Priorities are preemptive III The objective of the model is to minimize the total investment in spare parts subject to a constraint on the aggregate mean number of backorders. To solve this non-linear integer programming problem, we evaluate the aggregate mean number of backorders for a given base stock vector and scheduling rule. For static scheduling rules, we build an analytic model to evaluate the aggregate mean number of backorders. We use the exact method of Sleptchenko et al. (2015) to find the steady state joint queue length distribution under a given assignment of SKU’s to unique priority classes. Then, optimized base stock levels for each backorder constraint follow from Lagrangian functions and Newsvendor equations. For dynamic rules we build a simulation model to evaluate the aggregate mean number of backorders, due to the high computational complexity of applying an analytical model. The simulation model is used to find the average distribution of the joint queue length under a specific dynamic scheduling rule and specific base stock levels. Then, through an iterative process, optimized base stock levels for each backorder constraint follow from this distribution, Lagrangian relaxation and Newsvendor equations. SCHEDULING RULES We evaluate three static scheduling rules. The first heuristic schedules the SKU with the highest costs first (Heuristic 1). Heuristic 2 schedules the order with shortest processing times first. Finally, Heuristic 3 schedules the SKU with the highest product of costs and processing rate first. Furthermore, we tested six dynamic scheduling rules, starting with two rules that performed best in literature (Tiemessen and van Houtum, 2013). One that aims to maximize the expected backorder reduction (the MA-Rule) and one that aims to equalize the time until the next backorder (the MERT- Rule). Since the repair shop of the RNLAF differs from the repair shops discussed in these studies, we choose to test a four scheduling rules that are designed especially for the repair shop of the RNLAF. The first rule is comes closest to the currently used methodology of the RNLAF and is added to serve as a base line. This rule consist of three priority classes, with in the first class SKU’s with an active backorder, in the second class SKU’s with a net stock level of zero and in the third class SKU’s with a positive inventory level (the CPS-Rule). Ties are broken FCFS. The second rule breaks ties in the priority classes as in the CPS-Rule based on prices of the SKU’s (the MPS1-Rule) and the third rule breaks ties based on the deviation from the base stock level (the MPS2-Rule). Finally, the MA-Rule is adapted to take into account the prices of a spare part (the MMA-Rule). CASE STUDY To model the repair shop at the RNLAF as a repair shop with a single location with one workstation and one stock point, the repair shop at the RNLAF is simulated. This simulation is used to decide on the processing times of an order through the repair shop, which are used as input of both M/M/1 models. This case study shows that the costs of inventory can be reduced with at least 54,8% by only taking into account the prices of SKU’s and real-time inventory levels (the CPS-Rule) and with at least 54,6% by taking into account the stochasticity of the arrival rates, the processing rates and the real-time inventory levels (the MA-Rule).
Recommended publications
  • NL-ARMS O;Cer Education
    NL-ARMS Netherlands Annual Review of Military Studies 2003 O;cer Education The Road to Athens! Harry Kirkels Wim Klinkert René Moelker (eds.) The cover image of this edition of NL-ARMS is a photograph of a fragment of the uni- que ‘eye tiles’, discovered during a restoration of the Castle of Breda, the home of the RNLMA. They are thought to have constituted the entire floor space of the Grand North Gallery in the Palace of Henry III (1483-1538). They are attributed to the famous Antwerp artist Guido de Savino (?-1541). The eyes are believed to symbolize vigilance and just government. NL-Arms is published under the auspices of the Dean of the Royal Netherlands Military Academy (RNLMA (KMA)). For more information about NL-ARMS and/or additional copies contact the editors, or the Academy Research Centre of the RNLMA (KMA), at adress below: Royal Netherlands Military Academy (KMA) - Academy Research Centre P.O. Box 90.002 4800 PA Breda Phone: +31 76 527 3319 Fax: +31 76 527 3322 NL-ARMS 1997 The Bosnian Experience J.L.M. Soeters, J.H. Rovers [eds.] 1998 The Commander’s Responsibility in Difficult Circumstances A.L.W. Vogelaar, K.F. Muusse, J.H. Rovers [eds.] 1999 Information Operations J.M.J. Bosch, H.A.M. Luiijf, A.R. Mollema [eds.] 2000 Information in Context H.P.M. Jägers, H.F.M. Kirkels, M.V. Metselaar, G.C.A. Steenbakkers [eds.] 2001 Issued together with Volume 2000 2002 Civil-Military Cooperation: A Marriage of Reason M.T.I. Bollen, R.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Daedalus Aviation Group Slide 1 COMPANY PRESENTATION
    COMPANY PRESENTATION Contents o Mission Statement o History o Organization o Competences o Customers o Recommendations o Experience o Business Development initiatives o Summary www.daedalus.nl Daedalus Aviation Group Slide 1 COMPANY PRESENTATION Mission Statement “Deliver ultimate support for (military) aviation, covering the full scope from logistics to operations, in order to ensure optimal (weapon) system availability and operational readiness” Daedalus Aviation Group Slide 2 COMPANY PRESENTATION History o The name “Daedalus” is derived from Greek Mythology • Father of Icarus • In etymological dictionary referred to as “super technician” o Setup in October 1993 as Daedalus BV • Administration office for Elsinore Aerospace Services Inc. (EAS) • EAS provided F-16 technical staff for RNLAF • RNLAF discontinued EAS contract, Daedalus BV took over the service o Established as Daedalus Aviation Services in November 1994 • Inc. established in Ogden, Utah to allow for effective hiring of US citizens • Providing and administrating technical staff for F-16 maintenance, repair and overhaul o Current Headquarters: Tilburg, The Netherlands • Supporting worldwide operations Daedalus Aviation Group Slide 3 COMPANY PRESENTATION Organization - Chart Strategic Relationship Daedalus Aviation Group RNLAF Maintenance Depot Woensdrecht Air Base Daedalus Daedalus Daedalus Daedalus Daedalus Daedalus BV Personnel Projects & Aviation Project Chile Avionics BV Services BV Trade BV Services Inc. Limitada Joint Venture + AQAP 2120 NATO Quality Standard Fully aware
    [Show full text]
  • Stick Shaker Warning on ILS Final Eindhoven Airport
    DUTCH SAFETY BOARD Stick shaker warning on ILS final Eindhoven Airport 1 van 71 Stick shaker warning on ILS final Eindhoven Airport 31 May 2013 The Hague, June 2014 The reports issued by the Dutch Safety Board are open to the public. All reports are also available on the Safety Board’s website www.safetyboard.nl Source photo cover: Pictures by Pascal. 2 van 71 Dutch Safety Board The aim in the Netherlands is to limit the risk of accidents and incidents as much as possible. If accidents or near accidents nevertheless occur, a thorough investigation into the causes, irrespective of who are to blame, may help to prevent similar problems from occurring in the future. It is important to ensure that the investigation is carried out independently from the parties involved. This is why the Dutch Safety Board itself selects the issues it wishes to investigate, mindful of citizens’ position of independence with respect to authorities and businesses. In some cases the Dutch Safety Board is required by law to conduct an investigation. Dutch Safety Board Chairman: T.H.J. Joustra E.R. Muller P.L . M e u r s General Secretary: M. Visser Visiting address: Anna van Saksenlaan 50 Postal address: PO Box 95404 2593 HT The Hague 2509 CK The Hague The Netherlands The Netherlands Telephone: +31 (0)70 333 7000 Fax: +31 (0)70 333 7077 Website: www.safetyboard.nl NB: This report is published in the Dutch and English languages. If there is a difference in interpretation between the Dutch and English versions, the English text will prevail.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Stock WORLDWIDE NUCLEAR DEPLOYMENTS 1998
    Taking Stock WORLDWIDE NUCLEAR DEPLOYMENTS 1998 BY William M. Arkin Robert S. Norris Joshua Handler NRDC Nuclear Program MARCH 1998 NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. 1200 New York Ave., NW, Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20005 202/289-6868 VOICE 802-457-3426 (Arkin) 202-289-2369 (Norris) FAX 202-289-1060 INTERNET [email protected] [email protected] Worldwide Nuclear Deployments 1998 i © Copyright, Natural Resources Defense Council, 1998 ii TAKING STOCK Table of Contents Introduction . 1 Methodology . 4 Arms Control and Nuclear Weapons Deployments . 6 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START I) . 6 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START II) . 7 The Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty . 8 Unilateral Initiatives . 8 Future Nuclear Deployments . 11 The United States . 14 Nuclear History . 16 Nuclear Organization . 19 Nuclear Weapons Deployments . 24 Russia . 26 Nuclear Organization . 29 Nuclear Weapons Deployments . 33 Britain . 39 France . 42 China . 45 Appendix A: Locations of U.S. Nuclear Weapons, by Type . 53 Appendix B: U.S. Nuclear Weapons by Location . 55 Appendix C: U.S. Nuclear Weapons, Location Profiles . 56 By State California . 56 Colorado . 57 Georgia. 58 Louisiana . 59 Missouri . 60 Montana . 61 Nebraska . 61 Nevada . 62 New Mexico. 63 North Dakota . 65 Texas . 68 Virginia . 70 Washington . 70 Wyoming . 72 Overseas by Country Belgium . 72 Germany . 73 Greece . 76 Italy . 77 The Netherlands . 78 Turkey . 78 United Kingdom . 79 Appendix D: Location of Russian Nuclear Weapons, by Type . 81 Appendix E: Russian Nuclear Weapons by Location . 84 Appendix F: British Nuclear Weapons by Type and Location . 88 Appendix G: French Nuclear Weapons by Type and Location .
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Tsarstsars
    HELICOPTER LIFE W INTER 2008 / £3.99 www.helicopterlife.com RussianRussian TsarsTsars HELICOPTER LIFEis theHIGH LIFE Let’s sticktogether... ...it makes sense For all your aviation insurance needs... Hayward Aviation Limited Insurance Brokers Hayward Aviation Limited Harling House 47/51 Great Suffolk St London SE1 0BS Email: [email protected] Web: www.haywards.net Tel: +44 (0)20 7902 7800 Fax: +44 (0)20 7928 8040 Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority HELICOPTER Winter 2008 LIFE COVER STORY Show & Tell Guide 4 World Helicopter Aviation shows and conferences. Championships Gill Jenkins 32 The Editor’s Letter 5 watches helicopters in Eisenach in Aerial Forum 6 & 10 Germany and fol - Richard Patterson looks at Altitude & Hypoxia lows the fates of the national teams in Letters to the Editor 7, 11, 21 the WHC Flying Crackers 8, 9 Gas and Oil 40 Rainer Herzberg visits CHC Helikopter Service Oxford Graduates 12 A/S Norway’s largest supplier of oil platforms Georgina Hunter- Jones flies the Defenders of the Dutch 46 MD500 to Oxford to Arjan Dijksterhuis see the new airport, visits the Dutch which is hoping to Defence Helicopter become the ‘London Command, evalu - at Oxford’ alterna - ates how it has been tive to the small air - restructured after fields around the capital and those slightly further defence cuts and away such as Luton and Stansted whether the public are still getting New Technology 16 good bang for buck Helicopter Life looks at the new Sikorsky X-2 and the Spidertracks ELT alternative British Aristocracy 52
    [Show full text]
  • KODY LOTNISK ICAO Niniejsze Zestawienie Zawiera 8372 Kody Lotnisk
    KODY LOTNISK ICAO Niniejsze zestawienie zawiera 8372 kody lotnisk. Zestawienie uszeregowano: Kod ICAO = Nazwa portu lotniczego = Lokalizacja portu lotniczego AGAF=Afutara Airport=Afutara AGAR=Ulawa Airport=Arona, Ulawa Island AGAT=Uru Harbour=Atoifi, Malaita AGBA=Barakoma Airport=Barakoma AGBT=Batuna Airport=Batuna AGEV=Geva Airport=Geva AGGA=Auki Airport=Auki AGGB=Bellona/Anua Airport=Bellona/Anua AGGC=Choiseul Bay Airport=Choiseul Bay, Taro Island AGGD=Mbambanakira Airport=Mbambanakira AGGE=Balalae Airport=Shortland Island AGGF=Fera/Maringe Airport=Fera Island, Santa Isabel Island AGGG=Honiara FIR=Honiara, Guadalcanal AGGH=Honiara International Airport=Honiara, Guadalcanal AGGI=Babanakira Airport=Babanakira AGGJ=Avu Avu Airport=Avu Avu AGGK=Kirakira Airport=Kirakira AGGL=Santa Cruz/Graciosa Bay/Luova Airport=Santa Cruz/Graciosa Bay/Luova, Santa Cruz Island AGGM=Munda Airport=Munda, New Georgia Island AGGN=Nusatupe Airport=Gizo Island AGGO=Mono Airport=Mono Island AGGP=Marau Sound Airport=Marau Sound AGGQ=Ontong Java Airport=Ontong Java AGGR=Rennell/Tingoa Airport=Rennell/Tingoa, Rennell Island AGGS=Seghe Airport=Seghe AGGT=Santa Anna Airport=Santa Anna AGGU=Marau Airport=Marau AGGV=Suavanao Airport=Suavanao AGGY=Yandina Airport=Yandina AGIN=Isuna Heliport=Isuna AGKG=Kaghau Airport=Kaghau AGKU=Kukudu Airport=Kukudu AGOK=Gatokae Aerodrome=Gatokae AGRC=Ringi Cove Airport=Ringi Cove AGRM=Ramata Airport=Ramata ANYN=Nauru International Airport=Yaren (ICAO code formerly ANAU) AYBK=Buka Airport=Buka AYCH=Chimbu Airport=Kundiawa AYDU=Daru Airport=Daru
    [Show full text]
  • Crashed After Banner Pick-Up, Piper PA-25-235 Pawnee Crashed After Banner Pick-Up, Piper PA-25-235 Pawnee
    DUTCH SAFETY BOARD Crashed after banner pick-up, Piper PA-25-235 Pawnee Crashed after banner pick-up, Piper PA-25-235 Pawnee The Hague, May 2021 The reports issued by the Dutch Safety Board are publicly available on www.safetyboard.nl. Cover photo: De Haan The Dutch Safety Board When accidents or disasters happen, the Dutch Safety Board investigates how it was possible for these to occur, with the aim of learning lessons for the future and, ultimately, improving safety in the Netherlands. The Safety Board is independent and is free to decide which incidents to investigate. In particular, it focuses on situations in which people’s personal safety is dependent on third parties, such as the government or companies. In certain cases the Board is under an obligation to carry out an investigation. Its investigations do not address issues of blame or liability. Dutch Safety Board Chairman: J.R.V.A. Dijsselbloem M.B.A. van Asselt S. Zouridis Secretary Director: C.A.J.F. Verheij Visiting address: Lange Voorhout 9 Postal address: PO Box 95404 2514 EA The Hague 2509 CK The Hague The Netherlands The Netherlands Telephone: +31 (0)70 333 7000 Website: safetyboard.nl E-mail: [email protected] N.B. This report is published in English, a summary is available in the Dutch language. If there is a difference in interpretation between the Dutch and English version, the English text will previal. - 3 - CONTENTS Summary .................................................................................................................... 6 Recommendations .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force Missileers
    AirVolume 28, Number Force 2 “Advocates for Missileers”Mis sileers June 2020 The Quarterly Newsletter of the Association of Air Force Missileers Executive Director’s Corner, National Meeting Inside Front Cover The US Needs a New ICBM Now 1 A Tribute to General John Gordon 3 GLCM - A New World for Missileers 4 USAFE Plans for GLCM 8 Thoughts on GLCM Beddown 10 GLCM: Before There Were Bases 11 The Last GLCM Alert 12 Missileers and Public Service, Part II 14 Help Wanted for AAFM, Trivia Quiz 15 Patch Gallery Makeover, New AAFM Web Page 16 The 20th Air Force Page 17 Grand Forks MAF Antennas, Letters to AAFM 19 New Members, Taps for Missileers 20 New Member Form Inside Back Cover Reunions and Meetings Back Cover The Mission of the Association of Air Force Missileers - - Preserving the Heritage of Air Force Missiles and the People Involved With Them - Recognizing Outstanding Missileers - Keeping Missileers Informed - Encouraging Meetings and Reunions - Providing a Central Point of Contact for Missileers AAFM Newsletter Volume 28, Number 2 June 2020 Executive Director’s Corner Kathy and I cautiously transitioned from our home in Naples, FL back to Johnstown, CO, in May in the midst of varying phase of the country reopening. We have never travelled through Atlanta, Memphis, St. Louis, and Kansas City with such ease (the only positive of the COVID crisis). Our Board of Directors met via Zoom on June 20th to select our new officers and welcome our newest member. A special thanks to Bob Mattson who retired from the board this year after serving since 2009, most recently as our Vice President.
    [Show full text]
  • The Netherlands 2020
    The Netherlands 2020 1 Table of Contents Doing Business in the Netherlands_______________________________________ 4 Market Overview ________________________________________________________________4 Market Challenges ______________________________________________________________4 Market Opportunities ____________________________________________________________5 Market Entry Strategy ___________________________________________________________5 Leading Sectors for U.S. Exports and Investment __________________________ 6 Aircrafts and Parts ______________________________________________________________6 Cybersecurity __________________________________________________________________8 Defense Technology ___________________________________________________________10 Renewable Energy _____________________________________________________________12 Software ______________________________________________________________________14 Agriculture ____________________________________________________________________16 Customs, Regulations and Standards ___________________________________ 18 Trade Barriers _________________________________________________________________18 Import Tariffs __________________________________________________________________18 Import Requirements and Documentation _________________________________________18 Labeling and Marking Requirements ______________________________________________19 U.S. Export Controls ___________________________________________________________19 Temporary Entry _______________________________________________________________20
    [Show full text]
  • Accident with Apache During Night Flight Traning Near Rossum, 12 December 2007
    Accident with Apache during night flight traning near Rossum, 12 December 2007 The Hague, January 2009 (M2007DE1212-08) The reports issued by the Dutch Safety Board are open to the public. All reports are also available on the Safety Board’s website www.onderzoeksraad.nl 1/121 THE DUTCH SAFETY BOARD The Dutch Safety Board was established to investigate and determine the causes or probable causes of individual incidents or categories of incidents in all sectors. The sole purpose of a Dutch Safety Board investigation is to prevent future accidents or incidents and, if outcomes give cause to do so, issue associated recommendations. The organisation consists of a board with five permanent members, a professional Bureau manned by investigators and support staff and a number of permanent committees. Guidance committees are set up to oversee specific investigations. Dutch Safety Board Defence Committee Chairman: Prof. Pieter van Vollenhoven Chairman: Dr. J. P. Visser Vice Chairman: J. A. Hulsenbek Vice J. A. Hulsenbek A. H. Brouwer-Korf Chairman: (Retd) Commander G. C. Prof. F. J. H. Mertens Gillissen Dr. J. P. Visser (Retd) Lieutenant General Ad hoc: M. Schouten (Retd) General Major J.T. Bakker General secretary: M. Visser Project Manager: J. Heerink Visiting address: Anna van Saksenlaan 50 Postal PO Box 95404 2593 HT The Hague address: 2509 CK The Hague Telephone: +31 (0)70 333 7000 Fax: +31 (0)70 333 7077 Internet: www.onderzoeksraad.nl 2/121 INDEX APPENDIX 1 EXPLANATION OF THE INVESTIGATION 49 APPENDIX 2 REGULATIONS FOR THE ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK
    [Show full text]
  • Double Dutch Anniversary Heavy Rotary
    Double Dutch Anniversary Heavy Rotary by Carlo KUIT & Paul KIEVIT/ Bronco Aviation 116 From September 2018 Niels van den BERG is the Commander of 298 squadron. He started with the Squadron during 2011 when he transferred from sister squadron 300, operating the AS532 ‘Cougar’. One of the most important tasks the Commander has is the introduction of the new CH-47F MYII CAAS. April the 16th of 2020 to have stability in the As Boeing Philadelphia has and certification flights to marked the 75th Anniversary squadron. We have worked been identified as Critical safeguard our basic skillset of The Royal Netherlands incredibly hard over the last Infrastructure, the impact and readiness status as Air Force (RNLAF) 298 seven years implementing by COVID-19 has been we are not able to set up Squadron which is currently new procedures, quality minimal. The total number complex exercises with our operating a force of ten assurance and improved of new CH-47F MYII CAAS sister squadrons (300 and CH-47D ‘Chinooks’ and operations which has Chinooks within the Royal 301 Squadron) and the 11 Air is awaiting delivery of shown to be successful. Netherlands Air Force will Mobile Brigade. We have twenty CH-47F MY II CAAS There is no need to be twenty. Fifteen will be about half of the squadron Chinooks (US Army Multi change”. Niels continues assigned to 298 Squadron working from home and Year II program, Common “The big challenge for the at Gilze-Rijen Air Base while rotate personnel every Avionics Architecture squadron is implementing five will remain with 302 couple of days to avoid System) as replacement.
    [Show full text]
  • Crashed After Banner Pick-Up, Piper PA-25-235 Pawnee Crashed After Banner Pick-Up, Piper PA-25-235 Pawnee
    DUTCH SAFETY BOARD Crashed after banner pick-up, Piper PA-25-235 Pawnee Crashed after banner pick-up, Piper PA-25-235 Pawnee The Hague, May 2021 The reports issued by the Dutch Safety Board are publicly available on www.safetyboard.nl. Cover photo: De Haan The Dutch Safety Board When accidents or disasters happen, the Dutch Safety Board investigates how it was possible for these to occur, with the aim of learning lessons for the future and, ultimately, improving safety in the Netherlands. The Safety Board is independent and is free to decide which incidents to investigate. In particular, it focuses on situations in which people’s personal safety is dependent on third parties, such as the government or companies. In certain cases the Board is under an obligation to carry out an investigation. Its investigations do not address issues of blame or liability. Dutch Safety Board Chairman: J.R.V.A. Dijsselbloem M.B.A. van Asselt S. Zouridis Secretary Director: C.A.J.F. Verheij Visiting address: Lange Voorhout 9 Postal address: PO Box 95404 2514 EA The Hague 2509 CK The Hague The Netherlands The Netherlands Telephone: +31 (0)70 333 7000 Website: safetyboard.nl E-mail: [email protected] N.B. This report is published in English, a summary is available in the Dutch language. If there is a difference in interpretation between the Dutch and English version, the English text will previal. - 3 - CONTENTS Summary .................................................................................................................... 6 Recommendations .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]