112 Part 922—National Marine Sanctuary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

112 Part 922—National Marine Sanctuary Pt. 922 15 CFR Ch. IX (1–1–21 Edition) land either from a surface and/or subsurface B. pH Regime: This is indicative of the min- source. eral richness of estuarine waters and falls 1. Surface water: This is water flowing over into three main categories: the ground in the form of streams. Local var- 1. Acid: Waters with a pH of less than 5.5. iation in runoff is dependent upon the nature 2. Circumneutral: A condition where the of the soil (porosity and solubility), degree of pH ranges from 5.5 to 7.4. surface slope, vegetational type and develop- 3. Alkaline: Waters with a pH greater than ment, local climatic conditions, and volume 7.4. and intensity of precipitation. 2. Subsurface water: This refers to the pre- PART 922—NATIONAL MARINE cipitation that has been absorbed by the soil SANCTUARY PROGRAM REGULA- and stored below the surface. The distribu- tion of subsurface water depends on local cli- TIONS mate, topography, and the porosity and per- meability of the underlying soils and rocks. Subpart A—General There are two main subtypes of surface water: Sec. 922.1 Applicability of regulations in this a. Vadose water: This is water in the soil part. above the water table. Its volume with re- 922.2 Mission, goals, and special policies. spect to the soil is subject to considerable 922.3 Definitions. fluctuation. 922.4 Effect of National Marine Sanctuary b. Groundwater: This is water contained in designation. the rocks below the water table, is usually of more uniform volume than vadose water, and Subpart B—Sanctuary Nomination Process generally follows the topographic relief of the land being high hills and sloping into 922.10 General. valleys. 922.11 Selection of nominated areas for na- tional marine sanctuary designation. GROUP III—CHEMICAL A. Salinity. This reflects a complex mixture Subpart C—Designation of National Marine of salts, the most abundant being sodium Sanctuaries chloride, and is a very critical factor in the 922.20 Standards and procedures for designa- distribution and maintenance of many estua- tion. rine organisms. Based on salinity, there are 922.21 Selection of active candidates. two basic estuarine types and eight different 922.22 Development of designation mate- salinity zones (expressed in parts per thou- rials. sand-ppt.) 922.23 Coordination with States and other 1. Positive estuary: This is an estuary in Federal agencies. which the freshwater influx is sufficient to 922.24 Congressional documents. maintain mixing, resulting in a pattern of 922.25 Designation determination and find- increasing salinity toward the estuary ings. mouth. It is characterized by low oxygen concentration in the deeper waters and con- Subpart D—Management Plan siderable organic content in bottom sedi- Development and Implementation ments. 2. Negative estuary: This is found in par- 922.30 General. ticularly arid regions, where estuary evapo- 922.31 Promotion and coordination of Sanc- ration may exceed freshwater inflow, result- tuary use. ing in increased salinity in the upper part of the basin, especially if the estuary mouth is Subpart E—Regulations of General restricted so that tidal flow is inhibited. Applicability These are typically very salty (hyperhaline), moderately oxygenated at depth, and possess 922.40 Purpose. bottom sediments that are poor in organic 922.41 Boundaries. content. 922.42 Allowed activities. 3. Salinity zones (expressed in ppt): 922.43 Prohibited or otherwise regulated ac- tivities. a. Hyperhaline—greater than 40 ppt. 922.44 Emergency regulations. b. Euhaline—40 ppt to 30 ppt. 922.45 Penalties. c. Mixhaline—30 ppt to 0.5 ppt. 922.46 Response costs and damages. (1) Mixoeuhaline—greater than 30 ppt but 922.47 Pre-existing authorizations or rights less than the adjacent euhaline sea. and certifications of pre-existing author- (2) Polyhaline—30 ppt to 18 ppt. izations or rights. (3) Mesohaline—18 ppt to 5 ppt. 922.48 National Marine Sanctuary permits— (4) Oligohaline—5 ppt to 0.5 ppt. application procedures and issuance cri- d. Limnetic: Less than 0.5 ppt. teria. 114 VerDate Sep<11>2014 11:36 Sep 03, 2021 Jkt 253053 PO 00000 Frm 00124 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\253053.XXX 253053 Nat’l Oceanic and Atmospheric Adm., Commerce Pt. 922 922.49 Notification and review of applica- APPENDIX G TO SUBPART H OF PART 922—DES- tions for leases, licenses, permits, ap- IGNATED AREA FOR CERTAIN UNITED provals, or other authorizations to con- STATES COAST GUARD DISCHARGES duct a prohibited activity. 922.50 Appeals of administrative action. Subpart I—Gray’s Reef National Marine Sanctuary Subpart F—Monitor National Marine Sanctuary 922.90 Boundary. 922.91 Definitions. 922.60 Boundary. 922.92 Prohibited or otherwise regulated ac- 922.61 Prohibited or otherwise regulated ac- tivities—Sanctuary-wide. tivities. 922.93 Permit procedures and criteria. 922.62 Permit procedures and criteria. 922.94 Prohibited or otherwise regulated ac- tivities—Research area. Subpart G—Channel Islands National APPENDIX A TO SUBPART I OF PART 922— Marine Sanctuary BOUNDARY COORDINATES FOR THE GRAY’S REEF NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY RE- 922.70 Boundary. SEARCH AREA 922.71 Definitions. 922.72 Prohibited or otherwise regulated ac- tivities—Sanctuary-wide. Subpart J—National Marine Sanctuary of 922.73 Additional prohibited or otherwise American Samoa regulated activities—marine reserves 922.100 Scope of regulations. and marine conservation area. 922.101 Boundary. 922.74 Permit procedures and issuance cri- 922.102 Definitions. teria. 922.103 Prohibited or otherwise regulated APPENDIX A TO SUBPART G OF PART 922— activities—Sanctuary-wide. CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL MARINE 922.104 Prohibited or otherwise regulated SANCTUARY BOUNDARY COORDINATES activities—Sanctuary-wide except in the APPENDIX B TO SUBPART G OF PART 922—MA- Mulia¯ va Unit. RINE RESERVE BOUNDARIES 922.105 Prohibited or otherwise regulated APPENDIX C TO SUBPART G OF PART 922—MA- activities—Unit-specific. RINE CONSERVATION AREA BOUNDARY 922.106 Management and enforcement. 922.107 Permit procedures and criteria. Subpart H—Greater Farallones National Marine Sanctuary APPENDIX TO SUBPART J OF PART 922—AMER- ICAN SAMOA NATIONAL MARINE SANC- 922.80 Boundary. TUARY BOUNDARY COORDINATES 922.81 Definitions. 922.82 Prohibited or otherwise regulated ac- Subpart K—Cordell Bank National Marine tivities. Sanctuary 922.83 Permit procedures and issuance cri- teria. 922.110 Boundary. 922.84 Certification of preexisting leases, li- 922.111 Definitions. censes, permits, approvals, other author- 922.112 Prohibited or otherwise regulated izations, or rights to conduct a prohib- activities. ited activity. 922.113 Permit procedures and issuance cri- 922.85 Review of State permits and leases teria. for certain aquaculture projects. APPENDIX A TO SUBPART K OF PART 922— APPENDIX A TO SUBPART H OF PART 922— CORDELL BANK NATIONAL MARINE SANC- GREATER FARALLONES NATIONAL MARINE TUARY BOUNDARY COORDINATES SANCTUARY BOUNDARY COORDINATES APPENDIX B TO SUBPART K OF PART 922—LINE APPENDIX B TO SUBPART H OF PART 922—NO- REPRESENTING THE 50-FATHOM ISOBATH ANCHORING SEAGRASS PROTECTION ZONES SURROUNDING CORDELL BANK IN TOMALES BAY APPENDIX C TO SUBPART K OF PART 922—DES- APPENDIX C TO SUBPART H OF PART 922— IGNATED AREA FOR CERTAIN UNITED NORTHERN EXTENT OF TOMALES BAY STATES COAST GUARD DISCHARGES APPENDIX D TO SUBPART H OF PART 922—SPE- CIAL WILDLIFE PROTECTION ZONES WITHIN Subpart L—Flower Garden Banks National THE SANCTUARY Marine Sanctuary APPENDIX E TO SUBPART H OF PART 922— CARGO VESSEL PROHIBITION ZONES IN THE 922.120 Boundary. SANCTUARY 922.121 Definitions. APPENDIX F TO SUBPART H OF PART 922— 922.122 Prohibited or otherwise regulated WHITE SHARK APPROACH PROHIBITION activities. ZONES IN THE SANCTUARY 922.123 Permit procedures and criteria. 115 VerDate Sep<11>2014 11:36 Sep 03, 2021 Jkt 253053 PO 00000 Frm 00125 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\253053.XXX 253053 Pt. 922 15 CFR Ch. IX (1–1–21 Edition) APPENDIX A TO SUBPART L OF PART 922— Subpart P—Florida Keys National Marine FLOWER GARDEN BANKS NATIONAL MARINE Sanctuary SANCTUARY BOUNDARY COORDINATES APPENDIX B TO SUBPART L OF PART 922—CO- 922.160 Purpose. ORDINATES FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF THE 922.161 Boundary. INTERIOR TOPOGRAPHIC LEASE STIPULA- 922.162 Definitions. TIONS FOR OCS LEASE SALE 171 922.163 Prohibited activities—Sanctuary- wide. Subpart M—Monterey Bay National Marine 922.164 Additional activity regulations by Sanctuary Sanctuary area. 922.165 Emergency regulations. 922.130 Boundary. 922.166 Permits other than for access to the 922.131 Definitions. Tortugas Ecological Reserve—applica- 922.132 Prohibited or otherwise regulated tion procedures and issuance criteria. activities. 922.167 Permits for access to the Tortugas 922.133 Permit procedures and criteria. Ecological Reserve. 922.134 Review of certain State permits and 922.168 [Reserved] leases. APPENDIX I TO SUBPART P OF PART 922— APPENDIX A TO SUBPART M OF PART 922— FLORIDA KEYS NATIONAL MARINE SANC- MONTEREY BAY NATIONAL MARINE SANC- TUARY BOUNDARY COORDINATES TUARY BOUNDARY COORDINATES APPENDIX II TO SUBPART P OF PART 922—EX- APPENDIX B TO SUBPART M OF PART 922— ISTING MANAGEMENT AREAS BOUNDARY ZONES WITHIN THE SANCTUARY WHERE COORDINATES OVERFLIGHTS BELOW 1000 FEET ARE PRO- APPENDIX III TO SUBPART P OF PART 922— HIBITED WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREAS ACCESS APPENDIX C TO SUBPART M OF PART 922— RESTRICTIONS DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL SITES APPENDIX IV TO SUBPART P OF PART 922—EC- WITHIN THE SANCTUARY OLOGICAL RESERVES BOUNDARY APPENDIX D TO SUBPART M OF PART 922— COORDINATES DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL SITES AD- APPENDIX V TO SUBPART P OF PART 922— JACENT TO THE MONTEREY BAY NATIONAL SANCTUARY PRESERVATION AREAS BOUND- MARINE SANCTUARY ARY COORDINATES APPENDIX E TO SUBPART M OF PART 922—MO- APPENDIX VI TO SUBPART P OF PART 922— TORIZED PERSONAL WATERCRAFT ZONES SPECIAL-USE AREAS BOUNDARY COORDI- AND ACCESS ROUTES WITHIN THE SANC- NATES AND USE DESIGNATIONS TUARY APPENDIX VII TO SUBPART P OF PART 922— APPENDIX F TO SUBPART M OF PART 922—DA- AREAS TO BE AVOIDED BOUNDARY COORDI- VIDSON SEAMOUNT MANAGEMENT ZONE NATES Subpart N—Stellwagen Bank National Subpart Q—Hawaiian Islands Humpback Marine Sanctuary Whale National Marine Sanctuary 922.140 Boundary.
Recommended publications
  • FWC Division of Law Enforcement South Region
    FWC Division of Law Enforcement South Region – Bravo South Region B Comprised of: • Major Alfredo Escanio • Captain Patrick Langley (Key West to Marathon) – Lieutenants Roy Payne, George Cabanas, Ryan Smith, Josh Peters (Sanctuary), Kim Dipre • Captain David Dipre (Marathon to Dade County) – Lieutenants Elizabeth Riesz, David McDaniel, David Robison, Al Maza • Pilot – Officer Daniel Willman • Investigators – Carlo Morato, John Brown, Jeremy Munkelt, Bryan Fugate, Racquel Daniels • 33 Officers • Erik Steinmetz • Seth Wingard • Wade Hefner • Oliver Adams • William Burns • John Conlin • Janette Costoya • Andy Cox • Bret Swenson • Robb Mitchell • Rewa DeBrule • James Johnson • Robert Dube • Kyle Mason • Michael Mattson • Michael Bulger • Danielle Bogue • Steve Golden • Christopher Mattson • Steve Dion • Michael McKay • Jose Lopez • Scott Larosa • Jason Richards • Ed Maldonado • Adam Garrison • Jason Rafter • Marty Messier • Sebastian Dri • Raul Pena-Lopez • Douglas Krieger • Glen Way • Clayton Wagner NOAA Offshore Vessel Peter Gladding 2 NOAA near shore Patrol Vessels FWC Sanctuary Officers State Law Enforcement Authority: F. S. 379.1025 – Powers of the Commission F. S. 379.336 – Citizens with violations outside of state boundaries F. S. 372.3311 – Police Power of the Commission F. S. 910.006 – State Special Maritime Jurisdiction Federal Law Enforcement Authority: U.S. Department of Commerce - National Marine Fisheries Service U.S. Department of the Interior - U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service U.S. Department of the Treasury - U.S. Customs Service
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Creating a Species Inventory for a Marine Protected Area: the Missing
    Katherine R. Rice NOAA Species Inventory Project Spring 2018 Creating a Species Inventory for a Marine Protected Area: The Missing Piece for Effective Ecosystem-Based Marine Management Katherine R. Rice ABSTRACT Over the past decade, ecosystem-based management has been incorporated into many marine- management administrations as a marine-conservation tool, driven with the objective to predict, evaluate and possibly mitigate the impacts of a warming and acidifying ocean, and a coastline increasingly subject to anthropogenic control. The NOAA Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS) is one such administration, and was instituted “to serve as the trustee for a network of 13 underwater parks encompassing more than 600,000 square miles of marine and Great Lakes waters from Washington state to the Florida Keys, and from Lake Huron to American Samoa” (NOAA, 2015). The management regimes for nearly all national marine sanctuaries, as well as other marine protected areas, have the goal of managing and maintaining biodiversity within the sanctuary. Yet none of those sanctuaries have an inventory of their known species nor a standardized protocol for measuring or monitoring species biodiversity. Here, I outline the steps required to compile a species inventory for an MPA, but also describe some of stumbling blocks that one might encounter along the way and offer suggestions on how to handle these issues (see Appendix A: Process for Developing the MBNMS Species Inventory (PD-MBNMS)). This project consists of three research objectives: 1. Determining what species inventory efforts exist, how they operate, and their advantages and disadvantages 2. Determining the process of creating a species inventory 3.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Annual Report a SUMMARY Climate Change a Triple Threat for the Ocean CO2 Burning Fossil Fuels, Deforestation and Industrial Agriculture Release
    2019 Annual Report A SUMMARY Climate Change A triple threat for the ocean CO2 Burning fossil fuels, deforestation and industrial agriculture release carbon dioxide (CO2) and other heat-trapping gases into our atmosphere, causing our planet to warm. The ocean has buffered us from the worst impacts of climate > 90% ~25% HEAT change by absorbing more than 90 CO2 percent of this excess heat and about 25 percent of the CO2, but at the cost of causing significant harm to marine ecosystems. LESS MORE WARMER OXYGEN ACIDIC SEA LEVEL BLEACHING TOXIC ALGAE HABITATS ACIDIFICATION FISHERIES Sea level rise is Warm-water coral reefs Larger and more frequent Lower oxygen levels More acidic water Disruptions in fisheries accelerating, flooding (marine biodiversity blooms are making fish, are suffocating some harms animals that build affect the marine food coastal communities hotspots) could be lost if birds, marine mammals marine animals and shells, such as corals, web, local livelihoods, and and drowning the planet warms by and people sick. shrinking their habitats. clams, and oysters. global food security. wetland habitats. 2°C (3.6°F). In 2019, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report details the triple threat of climate change to ocean ecosystems: Warming, acidification, and deoxygenation. annualreport.mbari.org/2019 Illustration by Emily Hess Cover photo: Animation by Frame 48 Source: IPCC, 2019: Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (SROCC) View from the Masthead Climate Change A triple threat for the ocean CO 2 Advancing science Burning fossil fuels, deforestation and industrial agriculture release and engineering for carbon dioxide (CO2) and other heat-trapping gases into our atmosphere, causing our planet to Earth’s final frontier warm.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Keys Sea Heritage Journal
    Florida Keys Sea Heritage Journal VOL. 25 NO. 2 WINTER 2014/15 USS SHARK OFFICIAL QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF THE KEY WEST MARITIME HISTORICAL SOCIETY The Florida Keys Reprinted from the “Putnam’s Monthly.” Vol. VII, December 1856, No. XLVIII. “The Florida Keys.” The labors of an insignificant insect have dotted the sea, around the southernmost portion of our republic, with coral islands, or keys, of all dimensions, from the extended area of Key Largo, to a minute clump of mangroves, hardly larger than an ordinary-sized breakfast table. But these islands are indebted to the coral insect for their first foundation only. As soon as they reach the surface, the industrious architects cease their labors, and all further growth is dependent on other causes. These are many and various. A plank, torn from a wreck, and tossed about by the winds and waves for many days, may at last Key West wreckers at work. Photo credit: Monroe County Library. rest upon the surface of the coral. Sheltered from the waves by this quite an extent of ground has risen seed, borne by the bird from some slight barrier, the insects spread a like magic in the very midst of the more favored spot, drops upon the broad flat rock under its lee, which ocean. luxuriant soil, thirsting to receive soon becomes covered with sand This soil, teeming with the it, springs up, blossoms, and bears and earth, thus forming the first elements of fertility, does not long fruit. Other birds rest in the branches rudiments of a soil. This spreads remain barren and useless.
    [Show full text]
  • Publications Supported by NOAA's Office of Ocean Exploration And
    1 Publications Supported by NOAA’s Office of Ocean Exploration and Research Compiled by Chris Belter, NOAA Central Library Accurate as of 17 April 2012 Journal Articles (n=454) Ahyong ST. 2008. Deepwater crabs from seamounts and chemosynthetic habitats off eastern New Zealand (Crustacea : Decapoda : Brachyura). Zootaxa(1708):1-72. Aig D, Haywood K. 2008. Through the Sea Snow: The Central Role of Videography in the Deep Gulf Wrecks Mission. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 12(2):133-145. doi:10.1007/s10761-008-0049-7 Andrews AH, Stone RP, Lundstrom CC, DeVogelaere AP. 2009. Growth rate and age determination of bamboo corals from the northeastern Pacific Ocean using refined Pb-210 dating. Marine Ecology-Progress Series 397:173-185. doi:10.3354/meps08193 Angel MV. 2010. Towards a full inventory of planktonic Ostracoda (Crustacea) for the subtropical Northwestern Atlantic Ocean. Deep-Sea Research Part Ii-Topical Studies in Oceanography 57(24-26):2173-2188. doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.09.020 Arellano SM, Young CM. 2009. Spawning, Development, and the Duration of Larval Life in a Deep-Sea Cold-Seep Mussel. Biological Bulletin 216(2):149-162. Auster PJ. 2007. Linking deep-water corals and fish populations. Bulletin of Marine Science 81:93-99. Auster PJ, Gjerde K, Heupel E, Watling L, Grehan A, Rogers AD. 2011. Definition and detection of vulnerable marine ecosystems on the high seas: problems with the "move-on" rule. ICES Journal of Marine Science 68(2):254-264. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsq074 Auster PJ, Watling L. 2010. Beaked whale foraging areas inferred by gouges in the seafloor.
    [Show full text]
  • FKNMS Lower Region
    se encuentran entre los entre encuentran se Florida la de Cayos los de coralinos arrecifes Los agua. del salinidad la o como los erizos y pepinos de mar. Las hierbas marinas son una base para la crianza del crianza la para base una son marinas hierbas Las mar. de pepinos y erizos los como aves, peces y tortugas que se enredan en ella o la ingieren, confundiéndola con alimentos. con confundiéndola ingieren, la o ella en enredan se que tortugas y peces aves, grados C), ni más cálidas de 86 grados F (30 grados C), ni a cambios pronunciados de la calidad la de pronunciados cambios a ni C), grados (30 F grados 86 de cálidas más ni C), grados atíes y diversos peces, y son el hábitat de organismos marinos filtradores, así como forrajeros, como así filtradores, marinos organismos de hábitat el son y peces, diversos y atíes delicados puede asfixiarlos, romperlos o erosionarlos. La basura puede resultar mortal para las para mortal resultar puede basura La erosionarlos. o romperlos asfixiarlos, puede delicados vivir a la exposición continua de aguas del mar a temperaturas por debajo de los 68 grados F (18 F grados 68 los de debajo por temperaturas a mar del aguas de continua exposición la a vivir ue at motned acdn lmnii.Poocoa lmnoalstrua,man- tortugas, las a alimento Proporcionan alimenticia. cadena la de importante parte tuyen que las aves mueran de hambre. El cordel de pescar y la basura que se enreda en los corales los en enreda se que basura la y pescar de cordel El hambre.
    [Show full text]
  • United States National Museum
    * si 'a*»/ ^ ^ l^// kh < (M->'^^'' ^eparfrrxenf of fhc inferior: U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM. 21 BULLETIN UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM. NO. 18.—EXHIBIT OF THE FISHERIES AND FISH CULTURE OP THE ^^^ —-UNITED STATES OF AMERfCA. MADE AT BERLIN IN 1880. PREPARED UXDEU THE DIRECTION OF a. BROA^^ls^ ooode, DEPUTY COiTMISSIONEE. WASHINGTON: aOVFiRNMENT PETNTTNG- OFFICJE 18 80. '^epavimeni of ihc 55nfcrior U. a. NATIONAL MUSEUM. 21 BULLETIN unu'ei) states national museum. No. 18. PUBLISHED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION. WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1880. ADYEETISEMENT. This work is the twenty-first of a series of papers intended to illnstrate the collections of natural history and ethnology belonging- to the United States, and constituting the i^ational Museum, of which the Smithsonian Institution was placed in charge by the act of Congress of August 10, 1846. It has been prepared at the request of the Smithsonian Institution, and printed by authority of the honorable Secretary of the Interior. SPEXCER F. BAIRD, Secretary of the Snuthsonian Institution. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, March 29, 1880. INTERNATIONAL FISHERY EXHIBITION, BERLIN, 1880. EXHIBIT THE FISHERIES AND FISH CULTlIPiE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNATIONALE FISCHEEEI-AUSSTELLUNG, HELD AT BERLIN, APRIL 20, 1880, AND FORMING A PART OF THE COL- LECTIONS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEmi, MADE BY THE UNITED STATES FISH COMMISSION. PKEPARED UNDEU THE DIRECTION OI' a. BIlo^^^]s^ aooDE, DEPUTY COMMISSIONEK. WASHINGTOIT: <3-OVEENMENT FEINTING OFPIOE. 1880. TABLE OF CONTENTS. Section A.—AQUATIC ANIMALS AND PLANTS OF NOKTH AMERICA BENE- FICIAL OR INJURIOUS TO MAN. VERTEBKATES. Page. I. Mammals 1 1. Ferae (carnivores) 1 Fissipedia (laud carnivores) 1 Piunipedia (seals, Sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the United States Fish Commission Seattlenwf V.38
    'THE SPINY LOBSTER, Panulirus argus, OF SOUTHERN FLORIDA: ITS NATURAL HISTORY AND UTILIZATION. ~ By D. R. CRAWFORD, Assistant, U. S. Bureau of Fisheries, and W. J. J. DE SMIDT, Formerly Scientific Assistant, U. S. Bureau of Fisheries. Contribution from the U. S. Fisheries Biological Station, Key West, Fla. .;t. CONTENTS. Page. Introduction . Part 2.-Life history of the spiny lobster­ Classification and distribution . Continued. Common names . Habits and movements-Continued. Part I.-The spiny lobster fishery of south- Movements . ern Florida . Habits in captivity . The spiny lobster fishery at Key West, Food . Fla . Enemies . Importance of the fishery . Modes of protection . Fishing grounds . Sense organs . Local distribution . Habitat and migrations " . Season of the fishery . Influence of changes in tempera-. Apparatus and methods in general use.. ture . ~oo The bully . Influence of tides . 3°1 Fish traps ..•....•...............• Molting and regeneration '.' . 3°1 . The grains . Preparations for molting. .. 3°1 Hoop nets . Casting of the shell . 3°2. Seines . The newly molted spiny lobster . 3°2 Hooks and all other'means . Hardening of the new shell . 3°3 Boats and equipment . Autotomy . 3°3 Methods of fishing . , Regeneration . 3°3 Value of apparatus . Rate of growth and size . 3°4 Marketing the catch . Genital openings and copulation . 3°5 Abuses in the fishery . Genital openings of the male . 3°5 Part 2.-Life history of the spiny lobster . Genital openings of the female . 3°5 Description ......................••.. Copulation . 3°5 External characteristics . The seminal vesicle . 306 Coloration . Spawning . 306 Differences between young and Age of female at sexual maturity: . 306 adults . , The spawning .act .
    [Show full text]
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, GOVERNOR CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION 45 FREMONT, SUITE 2000 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2219 VOICE AND TDD (415) 904-5200 FAX (415) 904-5400 F4c STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION Consistency Determination No. CD-011-07 Staff: CLT-SF File Date: 2/28/2007 60th Day: 4/29/2007 75th Day: 5/14/2007 Extended to: 8/17/2007 Commission Meeting: 8/10/2007 FEDERAL AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration PROJECT LOCATION: The Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary extends from Marin County to Cambria (San Luis Obispo County), encompassing nearly 300 miles of shoreline and 5,322 square miles of ocean extending an average of twenty-five miles from shore (Exhibit 1). PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Revised management plan and revised set of regulations for the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary. SUBSTANTIVE FILE DOCUMENTS: See page 37. CD-011-07 (NOAA) Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary Page 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) submitted a consistency determination for the revised management plan and set of regulations governing activities in the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (MBNMS or Sanctuary). NOAA states that the proposed measures would afford better protection to the natural and cultural resources of the MBNMS. NOAA describes the proposed set of regulations as including both new regulations as well as changes to existing regulations, as follows: Proposed new regulations include prohibitions on:
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Coral Reefs of the World: 2002
    Status of Coral Reefs of the World: 2002 Edited by Clive Wilkinson PDF compression, OCR, web optimization using a watermarked evaluation copy of CVISION PDFCompressor Dedication This book is dedicated to all those people who are working to conserve the coral reefs of the world – we thank them for their efforts. It is also dedicated to the International Coral Reef Initiative and partners, one of which is the Government of the United States of America operating through the US Coral Reef Task Force. Of particular mention is the support to the GCRMN from the US Department of State and the US National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration. I wish to make a special dedication to Robert (Bob) E. Johannes (1936-2002) who has spent over 40 years working on coral reefs, especially linking the scientists who research and monitor reefs with the millions of people who live on and beside these resources and often depend for their lives from them. Bob had a rare gift of understanding both sides and advocated a partnership of traditional and modern management for reef conservation. We will miss you Bob! Front cover: Vanuatu - burning of branching Acropora corals in a coral rock oven to make lime for chewing betel nut (photo by Terry Done, AIMS, see page 190). Back cover: Great Barrier Reef - diver measuring large crown-of-thorns starfish (Acanthaster planci) and freshly eaten Acropora corals (photo by Peter Moran, AIMS). This report has been produced for the sole use of the party who requested it. The application or use of this report and of any data or information (including results of experiments, conclusions, and recommendations) contained within it shall be at the sole risk and responsibility of that party.
    [Show full text]
  • Shallow Water Wildlife and Habitat Protection Working Group
    Shallow Water Wildlife and Habitat Protection Working Group Draft Recommendations for Existing Wildlife Management Areas and Proposed New Zones UPPER KEYS UPPER KEYS UPPER KEYS Page 2 of 58 FOR SANCTUARY ADVISORY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION 7/2/2013 Dove Key Wildlife Management Area Dove Key: Area of very shallow flats that are heavily used by a variety of birds as well as bonefish and other desirable fish species. Existing Access Restrictions: No- motor zone on tidal flats; area around the two small islands closed. Proposed Recommendations: Recommendation 1: Determine if closed area is appropriate. Recommendation 2: Keep Dove Key and Rodriguez Key as separate areas. Recommendation 3: Connect Dove Key and Rodriguez Key areas. Page 3 of 58 FOR SANCTUARY ADVISORY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION 7/2/2013 Eastern Lake Surprise Wildlife Management Area Eastern Lake Surprise: Protect the endangered American crocodile and West Indian manatee that inhabit the area from vessel traffic. Existing Access Restrictions: Idle speed only/no-wake zone east of highway U.S. 1. Proposed Recommendation: Maintain existing zoning and restrictions. Page 4 of 58 FOR SANCTUARY ADVISORY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION 7/2/2013 Rodriguez Key Wildlife Management Area Rodriguez Key: Area of very shallow flats that are heavily used by a variety of birds as well as bonefish and other desirable fish species. Existing Access Restrictions: No- motor zone on tidal flats. Proposed Recommendations: Recommendation 1: Maintain existing restrictions and establish No Anchor Zone within existing area. Recommendation 2: Keep Dove Key and Rodriguez Key as separate areas. Recommendation 3: Connect Dove Key and Rodriguez Key areas. Page 5 of 58 FOR SANCTUARY ADVISORY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION 7/2/2013 Tavernier Key Wildlife Management Area Tavernier Key: Area of very shallow flats that are heavily used by a variety of birds as well as bonefish and other desirable fish species.
    [Show full text]
  • Key West Mark
    THE SOUTHERNMOST NEWSPAPER VOLUME 19 solareJANUARY 19,199s5 NUMBER 3 Bahama Village The Disappearing Neighborhood ByPamDoto fronts luring visitors. But this sort of rebirth comes with a high price tag, according to Brown urtis Brown has spent all of his 72 years and other longtime residents. in Bahama Village, raising a family and Brown says his property taxes have gone up C minding a business. about 10 percent in the last few years. He pays He's seen crime and blight and unity among close to $4,000 for his business and his home. his neighbors, and he's stuck around. But Several months ago, Brown sold his B and C Brown sees another trend coming and he may Grocery on the corner of Petronia Street and not have enough resources to weather it. Terry Lane to outside investors. He still runs New residents are moving into Brown's the store, and pays rent to the new owners. neighborhood, buying up property, renovating "The overhead is too much and business isn't homes and raising property values. These buy- that great," Brown says. ers, many of whom are from out of town, have If things get too expensive, Brown says he discovered the island's "back door," steeped in might move to Atlanta. Some of his neighbors history and bargains. also have leaving on their minds. In the past "It's the only place left in Key West where you year, Brown says about 10 people he knows can buy a free-standing home for less than have already left for less expensive communi- $100,000," said Lorraine Moore, areal estate ties.
    [Show full text]