EASTICK, Bruce
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Arts & Culture Plan South Australia 2019
Arts & Culture Plan South Australia 2019 - 2024 1 To Dream To Explore To Create Acknowledgment of Country Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have made and continue to make a unique and irreplaceable contribution to Australia. The South Australian Government acknowledges and respects Aboriginal people as the state’s first people and nations, and recognises Aboriginal people as traditional owners and occupants of South Australian land and waters. The South Australian Government acknowledges that the spiritual, social, cultural and economic practices of Aboriginal people come from their traditional lands and waters, and that Aboriginal people maintain cultural and heritage beliefs, languages and laws which are of ongoing importance today. Front cover Production: mi:wi Organisation: Vitalstatistix Photographer: Gregory Lorenzutti Table of Contents Page Vision, Mission, 4 Values 4 6 Goals 5 Message and commitment from the Government 7 Introduction 9 An Arts Plan for the future 10 Why now is the time for the Plan 10 Four reasons to pivot 11 South Australia. A history of creative and cultural innovation 12 1 The Structure of this Plan 16 South Australia, A gateway to the first and original story 17 Songlines: Tracking the Seven Sisters 18 Goal 1 20 Goal 2 24 Goal 3 28 Goal 4 32 Goal 5 36 Goal 6 40 Capturing value and impact 42 Footnotes 44 Adelaide College of the Arts Organisation: TAFE SA Photographer: Sam Roberts The Arts and Culture Plan for This Arts Plan is about igniting a This narrative is about how we TELL South Australia 2019 – 2024 new level of connectivity – between THESE STORIES, and relates strongly artists, organisations, institutions and to South Australia’s ‘market and brand’. -
Abortion, Homosexuality and the Slippery Slope: Legislating ‘Moral’ Behaviour in South Australia
Abortion, Homosexuality and the Slippery Slope: Legislating ‘Moral’ Behaviour in South Australia Clare Parker BMusSt, BA(Hons) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Discipline of History, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Adelaide. August 2013 ii Contents Contents ii Abstract iv Declaration vi Acknowledgements vii List of Abbreviations ix List of Figures x A Note on Terms xi Introduction 1 Chapter 1: ‘The Practice of Sound Morality’ 21 Policing Abortion and Homosexuality 24 Public Conversation 36 The Wowser State 44 Chapter 2: A Path to Abortion Law Reform 56 The 1930s: Doctors, Court Cases and Activism 57 World War II 65 The Effects of Thalidomide 70 Reform in Britain: A Seven Month Catalyst for South Australia 79 Chapter 3: The Abortion Debates 87 The Medical Profession 90 The Churches 94 Activism 102 Public Opinion and the Media 112 The Parliamentary Debates 118 Voting Patterns 129 iii Chapter 4: A Path to Homosexual Law Reform 139 Professional Publications and Prohibited Literature 140 Homosexual Visibility in Australia 150 The Death of Dr Duncan 160 Chapter 5: The Homosexuality Debates 166 Activism 167 The Churches and the Medical Profession 179 The Media and Public Opinion 185 The Parliamentary Debates 190 1973 to 1975 206 Conclusion 211 Moral Law Reform and the Public Interest 211 Progressive Reform in South Australia 220 The Slippery Slope 230 Bibliography 232 iv Abstract This thesis examines the circumstances that permitted South Australia’s pioneering legalisation of abortion and male homosexual acts in 1969 and 1972. It asks how and why, at that time in South Australian history, the state’s parliament was willing and able to relax controls over behaviours that were traditionally considered immoral. -
Body Freezer
BODY IN THE FREEZER the Case of David Szach Acknowledgements I am indebted to editorial comments and suggestions from Jan McInerney, Pat Sheahan, Anthony Bishop, Dr Harry Harding, Michael Madigan, and Dr Bob Moles. Andrew Smart of Blackjacket Studios designed the cover. I especially appreciate the support of my wife, Liz. ISBN: 978-0-9944162-0-9 This book is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Printed in Adelaide by Griffin Press Any enquiries to the author’s email: [email protected] BODY IN THE FREEZER the Case of David Szach TOM MANN Author’s note Following the publication of the Edward Splatt case in Flawed Forensics, David Szach approached me to examine and write up his case. I met with David Szach a number of times to record his version of events and his efforts to clear his name for the murder of lawyer Derrance Stevenson. After examining the trial transcripts, the grounds for appeal, and the reports by forensic scientists investigating the evidence presented by the forensic pathologist, I unravel the crime to reveal its hidden nature and consequences. CONTENTS Introduction … 1 1: Body in the freezer … 3 2: Prime suspect … 7 3: Derrance Stevenson and the Adelaide scene … 21 4: Before the trial … 26 5: Trial evidence … 32 6: Dr Colin Manock’s evidence … 47 7: David Szach’s statement … 60 8: Shaky underpinning for the Crown … 73 9: Blood and fingerprints -
Table of Contents
Table of Contents VOLUME ONE INTRODUCTION PORTFOLIO – PREMIER AND CABINET ................................................................................. 1 PORTFOLIO – PRIMARY INDUSTRIES AND RESOURCES ................................................... 2 PORTFOLIO – TREASURY AND FINANCE............................................................................... 3 PORTFOLIO – INDUSTRY AND TRADE.................................................................................... 4 PORTFOLIO – JUSTICE ............................................................................................................... 5 VOLUME TWO INTRODUCTION PORTFOLIO – HUMAN SERVICES ............................................................................................ 6 PORTFOLIO – TRANSPORT, URBAN PLANNING AND THE ARTS...................................... 7 PORTFOLIO – ADMINISTRATIVE AND INFORMATION SERVICES .................................. 8 PORTFOLIO – EDUCATION, TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT ............................................ 9 PORTFOLIO – ENVIRONMENT AND HERITAGE ..................................................................10 PORTFOLIO – WATER RESOURCES........................................................................................11 1. INTRODUCTION The Portfolio Statements are a key element of the accrual–output budgeting approach as they outline financial and non-financial information about the services provided to and on behalf of the community by each portfolio. The following discussion outlines key aspects of the portfolio -
Steamtown Heritage Rail Centre Peterborough
ENGINEERING HERITAGE RECOGNITION STEAMTOWN HERITAGE RAIL CENTRE PETERBOROUGH Engineering Heritage SA August 2017 Cover photograph: T Class Locomotive 199 was built by James Martin & Co of Gawler and entered service on 4 March 1912 It was taken out of service in 1970; displayed in a public park from 1973 to 1980; then stored in the roundhouse until 2008 when it was given a “cosmetic restoration” and placed on display in the former diesel depot [Photo: Richard Venus 4244] Table of Contents 1. Nomination for Engineering Heritage Recognition 1 2. Agreement of Owner 2 3. Description of Work 3 4. Assessment of Significance 5 5. Petersburg: Narrow Gauge Junction (1880-1919) 6 5.1 The “Yongala” Junction 6 5.2 Petersburg-Silverton 10 5.3 Silverton Tramway Company 14 5.4 Northern Division, South Australian Railways 16 5.5 Workshop Facilities 17 5.6 Crossing the Tracks 18 5.7 New Lines and the Break of Gauge 20 6. Peterborough: Divisional Headquarters (1918-1976) 23 6.1 Railway Roundhouse 23 6.2 The Coal Gantry 24 6.3 Rail Standardisation 29 7. Steamtown Heritage Rail Centre (1977- ) 31 7.1 Railway Preservation Society, 1977-2005 31 7.2 Steamtown Heritage Rail Centre (2005- ) 33 7.3 The Sound and Light Show 34 8. Associations 37 8.1 Railway Commissioners 37 8.2 Railway Contractors 38 9. Interpretation Plan 41 9.1 Interpretation 41 9.2 Marker Placement and Presentation Ceremony 41 Appendices A1. Presentation Ceremony 42 A1.1 Presentation of Marker 42 A1.2 Significance to Peterborough 46 A2. Steamtown Structures 47 A3. -
Public Transport Buildings of Metropolitan Adelaide
AÚ¡ University of Adelaide t4 É .8.'ìt T PUBLIC TRANSPORT BUILDII\GS OF METROPOLTTAN ADELAIDE 1839 - 1990 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Architecture and Planning in candidacy for the degree of Master of Architectural Studies by ANDREW KELT (û, r're ¡-\ ., r ¡ r .\ ¡r , i,,' i \ September 1990 ERRATA p.vl Ljne2}oBSERVATIONshouldreadOBSERVATIONS 8 should read Moxham p. 43 footnote Morham facilities p.75 line 2 should read line 19 should read available Labor p.B0 line 7 I-abour should read p. r28 line 8 Omit it read p.134 Iine 9 PerematorilY should PerernPtorilY should read droP p, 158 line L2 group read woulC p.230 line L wold should PROLOGUE SESQUICENTENARY OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT The one hundred and fiftieth anniversary of the establishment of public transport in South Australia occurred in early 1989, during the research for this thesis. The event passed unnoticed amongst the plethora of more noteworthy public occasions. Chapter 2 of this thesis records that a certain Mr. Sp"y, with his daily vanload of passengers and goods, started the first regular service operating between the City and Port Adelaide. The writer accords full credit to this unsung progenitor of the chain of events portrayed in the following pages, whose humble horse drawn char ò bancs set out on its inaugural joumey, in all probability on 28 January L839. lll ACKNO\ryLEDGMENTS I would like to record my grateful thanks to those who have given me assistance in gathering information for this thesis, and also those who have commented on specific items in the text. -
1 Adelaide Hills Council Minutes of Meeting Tuesday 17 January 2012 63 Mt Barker Road Stirling
1 ADELAIDE HILLS COUNCIL MINUTES OF MEETING TUESDAY 17 JANUARY 2012 63 MT BARKER ROAD STIRLING In Attendance: Mayor Bill Spragg Councillors Ward Councillor Ron Nelson Manoah Councillor Jan-Claire Wisdom Councillor Ian Bailey Marble Hill Councillor Jan Loveday Councillor Kate Hosking Councillor John Kemp Mt Lofty Councillor Simon Jones Councillor Bill Gale Onkaparinga Valley Councillor Linda Green Torrens Valley Councillor Malcolm Herrmann In Attendance Peter Peppin Chief Executive Officer Tim Hancock Director Engineering Tim Piper Director Finance Vanessa Nixon Acting Manager Planning & Development Services Pam Williams Minute Secretary 1 Commencement The meeting commenced at 6.35pm. 2 Opening Statement Council acknowledges that we meet on the traditional lands of the Peramangk and Kaurna people and we recognise their connection with the land. We understand that we do not inherit the land from our ancestors but borrow it from our children and in this context the decisions we make should be guided by the principle that nothing we do should decrease our children’s ability to live on this land. Mayor 14 February 2012 2 ADELAIDE HILLS COUNCIL MINUTES OF MEETING TUESDAY 17 JANUARY 2012 63 MT BARKER ROAD STIRLING 3 Apologies/Leave of Absence 3.1 Apology Moved Cr John Kemp Carried Unanimously S/- Cr Malcolm Herrmann 1 That the apology from Councillor Vonow for unavoidable absence be accepted and leave of absence from the meeting granted. 3.2 Leave of Absence Cr Luke Ritchie 4 Previous Minutes 4.1 Council Meeting 13 December 2011 Moved Cr Malcolm Herrmann Carried Unanimously S/- Cr Jan-Claire Wisdom 2 That the minutes of the ordinary meeting held on 13 December 2011 as supplied, be confirmed as an accurate record of the proceedings of that meeting. -
Keep19-010282.Pdf
SUBSCRIPTIONS wor~c~--... ~- A subscription to the Keep It In The Ground costs f25 for individuals WISE was set up by safe energy ac ($5.00, $12.50) and f50 for institutions tivists in 1978 to tunetion as an in per year (10 issues). ternational switchboard tor tocal Up until this stage the KIITG expenses and national safe energy groups have been financed by the Smilinq Sun around the world who want to ex Foundation, Novib and NCO. This year change information and support we are facinq the big problem: they one another. are most likely unable to continue WISE now has relays in 11 coun funding us. This means that to continue tries and a wor1dwide network of to publish KIITG, we have to ask our grassroots contacts. friends and readers for more assistance. We are funded by the anti-nuclear Several donations of flOO would be very movement through sales of the wonderful. Smiling Sun symbol 'Nuclear Ener GIRO: 4088285 gy? No Thanks'. Look on the back cover for your nearest For information on WISE publies relay. If there is no relay in your tions and on how to become a area, subscribe direct via WISE Amster member or give financial support dam. contact: WISE-Ama1en:lam, Blasl-traat 90, ABOUT THIS NEWSLETTER 1081 cw Amllerdam, TheNelherlanda, Tel.: 020-124264, Post Account: 40.88.285 This is a newsletter linking together in an information chain people all round the world workinq to stop uranium mininq. It is a participation publication, This issue of Keep It In The Ground is the and all people are invited to send art combined work of the Amsterdam liltaff, the icles to us. -
The Fairness Clause in South Australia
ELECTORAL REGULATION RESEARCH NETWORK/DEMOCRATIC AUDIT OF AUSTRALIA JOINT WORKING PAPER SERIES THE FAIRNESS CLAUSE IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA Jenni Newton-Farrelly (Electoral Specialist, South Australian Parliament Research Library) WORKING PAPER NO. 2 (OCTOBER 2012) 1 South Australia’s fairness clause is unique in Australia, although similar requirements have been proposed in WA and also NSW.1 This research paper looks at why a fairness clause seemed necessary in South Australia, and why the parliament chose a fairness clause rather than a different mechanism. The paper shows that both of South Australia’s major parties had, from the 1960s, made numerous statements that the aim of a fair electoral system should be to allow a party to assume the government benches if it won the support of a majority of voters. When the fairness requirement was adopted in 1990 it was not a new proposal – a similar requirement had first been proposed in 1975. For all of the fourteen year period from the 1975 proposal to the 1989 select committee recommendation, a special redistribution criterion had been conceptualized as a remedy for bias caused by the overconcentration of one party’s support in a few safe seats. And for all of that time there was a generally-held assumption that if the bias was addressed then the new districts would generate an outcome at a subsequent election which would return a party to government if it had the support of a majority of voters. Only the 1990 HA select committee sounded a warning that other factors, such as the way that parties campaign, might interfere with the translation of votes into seats. -
Victor Harbor Heritage Survey Volume 1
VICTOR HARBOR HERITAGE SURVEY VOLUME 1 SURVEY OVERVIEW November 1997 Donovan and Associates History and Historic Preservation Consultants P.O. Box 436, Blackwood, S.A. 5051 VICTOR HARBOR HERITAGE SURVEY VOLUME 1- Survey Overview VOLUME 2- Built Heritage VOLUME 3- Natural Heritage VICTOR HARBOR HERITAGE SURVEY 0 IO kw.S, VOLUME I 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 OBJECTIVES 1-5 1.2 STUDY AREA 1-5 1.3 MEffiODOLOGY 1-6 1.4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1-7 1.5 PROJECT TEAM 1-7 2. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 1-8 2.1 PRE-HISTORY 1-9 2.2 EARLY HISTORY 1-9 2.3 EARLY WHITE SETTLEMENT 1-11 2.4 MARITIME DEVELOPMENT 1-17 2.5 LATE NINETEENTH CENTURY 1-33 DEVELOPMENT 2.6 EARLY TWENTIETH CENTURY 1-41 DEVELOPMENT 2.7 DEVELOPMENT AFTER WORLD WAR IT 1-59 3. RECOMMENDATIONS: BUILT HERITAGE 3.1 STATE HERITAGE PLACES 1-75 3.1.1 Victor Harbor-Suburban 1-75 3.2 STATE HERITAGE AREAS 1-75 3.3 PLACES OF LOCAL HERITAGE VALUE 1-75 3.3.1 Victor Harbor-Town Centre 1-75 3.3.2 Victor Harbor-Suburban 1-76 3.3.3 Victor Harbor-Environs 1-77 3.3.4 Bald Hills 1-77 3.3.5 Hindmarsh Valley!fiers 1-77 3.3.6 Inman Valley 1-77 3.3.7 Waitpinga 1-78 3.4 HISTORIC (CONSERVATION) ZONES 1-78 3.4.1 Victor Harbor-Town Centre 1-78 3.4.2 Victor Harbor-Suburban 1-78 4. RECOMMENDATIONS: NATURAL HERITAGE 4.1 NATIONAL ESTATE PLACES 1-80 4.1.1 Hundred of Encounter Bay 1-80 4.1.2 Hundred ofWaitpinga 1-80 4.2 STATE HERITAGE PLACES 1-80 4.2.1 Hundred of Encounter Bay 1-80 4.2.2 Hundred ofWaitpinga 1-80 4.3 PLACES OF LOCAL HERITAGE VALUE 1-80 4.3.1 Hundred of Encounter Bay 1-81 Donovan and Associates 1-2 4.3.2 Hundred of Goolwa 1-81 4.3.2 Hundred of Waitpinga 1-81 5. -
Oh 955 Nick Minchin
STATE LIBRARY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA J. D. SOMERVILLE ORAL HISTORY COLLECTION OH 955 Full transcript of an interview with Nick Minchin on 19 October 2010 By Susan Marsden for the EMINENT AUSTRALIANS ORAL HISTORY PROJECT Recording available on CD Access for research: Unrestricted Right to photocopy: Copies may be made for research and study Right to quote or publish: Publication only with written permission from the State Library OH 955 NICK MINCHIN NOTES TO THE TRANSCRIPT This transcript was created by the J. D. Somerville Oral History Collection of the State Library. It conforms to the Somerville Collection's policies for transcription which are explained below. Readers of this oral history transcript should bear in mind that it is a record of the spoken word and reflects the informal, conversational style that is inherent in such historical sources. The State Library is not responsible for the factual accuracy of the interview, nor for the views expressed therein. As with any historical source, these are for the reader to judge. It is the Somerville Collection's policy to produce a transcript that is, so far as possible, a verbatim transcript that preserves the interviewee's manner of speaking and the conversational style of the interview. Certain conventions of transcription have been applied (ie. the omission of meaningless noises, false starts and a percentage of the interviewee's crutch words). Where the interviewee has had the opportunity to read the transcript, their suggested alterations have been incorporated in the text (see below). On the whole, the document can be regarded as a raw transcript. -
Ministers Responsible for Agriculture Since Parliamentary Government Commenced in October 1856 and Heads of the Department of Agriculture/PISA/PIRSA
Ministers responsible for Agriculture since Parliamentary government commenced in October 1856 and Heads of the Department of Agriculture/PISA/PIRSA Dates Government Dates of Minister Ministerial title Name of Head of Date range portfolio Department Department of Head 1856– Boyle Travers 24.10.1856– Charles Bonney Commissioner of Crown 1857 Finniss 21.8.1857 Lands and Immigration 1857 John Baker 21.8.1857– William Milne Commissioner of Crown 1.9.1857 Lands and Immigration 1857 Robert Torrens 1.9.1857– Marshall McDermott Commissioner of Crown 30.10.1857 Lands and Immigration 1857– Richard Hanson 30.9.1857– Francis Stacker Dutton Commissioner of Crown 1860 2.6.1859 Lands and Immigration 2.6.1859– John Bentham Neales Commissioner of Crown 5.7.1859 Lands and Immigration 5.7.1859– William Milne Commissioner of Crown 9.5.1860 Lands and Immigration 1860– Thomas 9.5.1860– John Tuthill Bagot Commissioner of Crown 1861 Reynolds 20.5.1861 Lands and Immigration 1861 Thomas 20.5.1861– Henry Bull Templar Commissioner of Crown Reynolds 8.10.1861 Strangways Lands and Immigration 1861 George 8.10.1861– Matthew Moorhouse Commissioner of Crown Waterhouse 17.10.1861 Lands and Immigration 1861– George 17.10.1861– Henry Bull Templar Commissioner of Crown 1863 Waterhouse 4.7.1863 Strangways Lands and Immigration 1863 Francis Dutton 4.7.1863– Francis Stacker Dutton Commissioner of Crown 15.7.1863 Lands and Immigration 1863– Henry Ayers 15.7.1863– Lavington Glyde Commissioner of Crown 1864 22.7.1864 Lands and Immigration 1864 Henry Ayers 22.7.1864– William Milne