DOCSLIB.ORG

Android Vs Ios

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Android Vs Ios Android vs iOS By Mohammad Daraghmeh Jack DeGonzaque AGENDA ● Android ○ History ● Samsung S6 ○ System Architecture ○ Processor ○ Performance Metrics ● iOS ○ History ● iPhone 6 ○ System Architecture ○ Processor ○ Performance Metrics ● Samsung S6 vs iPhone 6 Android Android History ● The Android OS was created mainly by three amazing people Andy Rubin, Rich Miner, Nick Sears, and Chris White. ○ Initial development for the OS was to create an operating system for digital cameras and PC integration. ○ After gauging the size of the market for such a product, Rubin and his colleagues decided to target the booming smartphone market. ● In 2005, Google also wanted to venture into the smartphone market and did so by acquiring Android Inc. ○ The primary directive was to develop technologies that are developed and distributed at a significantly lower cost to make it more accessible. ○ In 2008, the first Android running smartphone, the HTC Dream, was released. Android History (Cont.) ● The Android operating system has become one of the most popular operating systems. ○ According to research firm, called Gartner, more than a billion Android devices were sold in 2014, which is roughly five times more than Apple iOS devices sold and three times more Windows machines sold. ● Their attribute to success stems from the fact that Google does not charge for Android, and that most phone manufacturers are making cost effective phones, which results in affordable smartphones and internet services at low costs for consumers to enjoy. SAMSUNG GALAXY S6 System Architecture ● Samsung S6 uses the Exynos 7420 processor, which is developed by Samsung as well. ○ The Exynos 7420 is a 78 mm^2 SoC comprised of 8 cores connected to two L2 cache instances. ○ One of the most notable features of the Exynos 7420 is that it uses 14 nm FinFET LEP process. ○ FinFET, also known as Fin Field Effect Transistor is a type of non-planar or "3D" transistor used in the design of modern processors. ○ FinFET process, transistor sizes can decrement, which would inherently raise concerns regarding current leakage and short-channel drawbacks. ○ The FinFET process avoids these undesirable side-effects due to its fin-like architecture design. Processor Exynos 7420 The A57 CPUs and the shader cores are by far the two greatest power consuming components on the SoC. Having the two as far away from each other keeps hot spots at a minimum. Processor (Cont.) ● A57 cluster and A53 clusters comprise the ARM big.Little architecture to improve energy efficiency. ● Connected together by the Cache Coherent Interconnect (CCI). ● Large tasks handled by A57 cluster. Small tasks handled by A53 cluster. Performance Metrics ● When comparing the Exynos processor and a similar class processor, the Snapdragon 810, the Exynos outperforms by far. ● The unique feature that sets the Exynos apart from the Snapdragon 810 is the manufacturing process. The Exynos processor was created using a 14-nm manufacturing process while the Snapdragon 810 was created using a 20-nm manufacturing process. ● Samsung reported that when compared to the 20-nm chipsets, the Exynos 7420 proved to be 30-35% more energy-efficient, show 20% better performance and 30% increase in productivity. iOS Apple History ● The iPhone OS operating system first debuted at the MacWorld Conference & Expo on January 9th, 2007. ● Apple originally used PowerPC processors for their other products, such as the macs and MacBook’s. PowerPC, which stands for Performance Optimization with Enhanced RISC-Performance Computing, a RISC instruction set architecture. ○ In 2005, Steve Jobs announced a transition to Intel x86 processors at the Worldwide Developers Conference. Apple iPhone 6 System Architecture ● iPhone 5S with the A7 processor included 4 DRAM interfaces,CPU with L1 and L2 cache, an SRAM block, and 4 GPU cores. The A7 processor size is 102 mm2. The A7 is a dual core processor that resides on the left side of the layout. ● iPhone 6 with the A8 processor had the most notable difference in the layout compared to the A7 chip with the GPU and CPU have switched locations. ○ The A8 processor is approximately 51% smaller than the A7. ○ The A8 processor also holds over 1 billion more transistors compared to the A7. ○ The A7 processor was produced using a 28nm processes. The A8 processor was created using a 20nm process. ● The primary functionality for the 4 MB SRAM cache memory block A8 serviced the GPU and CPU. The SRAM block plays an integral role in serving larger memory requests without having to go off the chip to fetch memory. Processors ● The iPhone 6 uses a processor designed by Apple, called the A8. ○ The A8 is a 64-bit Arm based System on a Chip (SoC) that showed massive improvements in comparison to its predecessor, the A7. ○ The A8 is manufactured on a 20nm process by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC). ○ The chip itself contains 2 billion transistors. ○ The recent advancements in decreasing transistor size made the A8’s physical size 13% smaller compared to the A7. ○ The A8 SoC has a per-core L1 cache of 64 KB for data and 64 KB for instructions, a 1 MB L2 cache shared by CPU cores and a 4 MB L3 cache that is used by the entire SoC. Processor (Cont.) ● On the iPhone 6, the A8 processor is also accompanied by a motion coprocessor, called the M7. ● The purpose of the M7 processor is to continuously collect sensor data. The sensors the processor collects data from the iPhone’s accelerometer, gyroscope, and compass. ○ The primary role for having two processors was to reduce power consumption. ● If the A8 processor was solely tasked for all computations and data collection, the processor would continuously be awake and running. ● The M7 processor allows for background monitoring and sensor data collection with minimal penalty with respect to power consumption. ○ The M7 processor is also created using a 90-nm process. Performance Metrics ● The A8 processor is clocked at 1.4 GHz while the A7 is clocked at 1.3 GHz. ○ The most noticeable improvement between processors is the latency for floating point addition and integer multiplication. ○ It takes one less clock cycle for the A8 to process both floating point addition and integer multiplication respectively. ● With similar resource availability, integer operation tests were performed on using over twenty different programs. ○ The A8 processor shows massive improvements in throughput for low level program tests, such as Dijkstra. ○ Based on the performed integer tests, the A8 processor had a 14.5% advantage for integer operations compared to the A7. Antutu Performance Benchmarks ● iPhone 6 - better at single core operations ● Design takes advantage of its single core strengths. ● S6 - better at multi-core operations ● Design takes advantage of its multi-core strengths. Which is better? A matter of preference ● iPhone 6 ○ Closed loop; integration with other Apple products ○ App Store ○ Simplistic interface ○ Market strategies and branding ● Samsung Galaxy S6 ○ Open Source development ○ Google Play ○ No middle man between developers and consumers ○ Cost effective ○ ● Other factors not discussed: ○ Battery life, screen resolution, brand loyalty, and even accessories Sources ● http://www.macworld.com/article/1054769/smartphones/iphone.html ● https://gigaom.com/2010/06/07/419-deja-vu-apples-new-ios-brand-is-already-used-by-cisco/ ● http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/16/4230468/android-originally-designed-for-cameras-before-smartphones ● http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/28/technology/personaltech/a-murky-road-ahead-for-android-despite-market-dominance.html?_r=0 ● http://www.openhandsetalliance.com/press_110507.html ● http://gizmodo.com/5053264/t-mobile-g1-full-details-of-the-htc-dream-android-phone ● http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2005/06/06Apple-to-Use-Intel-Microprocessors-Beginning-in-2006.html ● http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2014/09/09Apple-Announces-iPhone-6-iPhone-6-Plus-The-Biggest-Advancements-in-iPhone-History.html ● http://www.extremetech.com/computing/189787-apples-a8-soc-analyzed-the-iphone-6-chip-is-a-2-billion-transistor-20nm-monster ● http://www.anandtech.com/show/8554/the-iphone-6-review/3 ● http://www.phonearena.com/news/Apple-iPhone-6-Apple-A8-performance-review-CPU-and-GPU-compared-to-the-best-Android-phones-o ut-there_id60932 ● http://www.anandtech.com/show/8562/chipworks-a8 ● http://www.anandtech.com/show/7335/the-iphone-5s-review/8 ● http://www.anandtech.com/show/7335/the-iphone-5s-review/8 ● http://www.phonearena.com/news/Technology-explained-inside-the-Exynos-7-Octa-7420-Samsungs-best-chipset-yet_id67278 ● http://www.anandtech.com/show/9330/exynos-7420-deep-dive/2 ● http://www.phonearena.com/news/Preliminary-Snapdragon-810-vs-Exynos-7420-benchmarks-show-Qualcomm-made-the-faste r-SoC---with-caveats_id65973 ● http://www.phonearena.com/news/Samsung-Galaxy-S6-Exynos-7420-vs-HTC-One-M9-Snapdragon-810-vs-iPhone-6-Apple-A8-performan ce-review_id67964.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Volume 13 (PDF)
    Volume 13, Summer 2019 Copyright Ó 2019 Assistive Technology Industry Association ISSN 1938-7261 Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits | i The Role of Research in Influencing Assistive Technology Products, Policy, and Practice Volume 13, Summer 2019 Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits The Role of Research in Influencing Assistive Technology Products, Policy, and Practice Volume 13, Summer 2019 Editor in Chief Focused Issue Editor Jennifer L. Flagg Kathleen M. Murphy Center on KT4TT, University oF BuFFalo American Institutes For Research Publication Managers Associate Editors Victoria A. Holder Kate Herndon Tools For LiFe, Georgia Institute oF Technology American Printing House For the Blind Elizabeth A. Persaud Carolyn P. Phillips Tools For LiFe, Georgia Insitute oF Technology Tools For LiFe, Georgia Institute oF Technology Caroline Van Howe Copy Editor Assistive Technology Industry Association Beverly Nau Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits (ATOB) is a collaborative peer-reviewed publication of the Assistive Technology Industry Association (ATIA). Editing policies oF this issue are based on the Publication Manual oF the American Psychological Association (6th edition) and may be Found online at www.atia.org/atob/editorialpolicy. The content does not reflect the position or policy of ATIA and no official endorsement should be inferred. Editorial Board Members and Managing Editors David Banes Beth Poss Managing Director, David Banes Access and Administrator, Montgomery County Schools, Inclusion Services Maryland Russell T. Cross Ben SatterField Director of Clinical Operations, Prentke Romich Research Consultant, Center for AT Company Excellence, Tools For LiFe at Georgia Institute oF Technology Anya Evmenova Associate Professor, Division of Special Judith Schoonover Education and disAbility Research, George Occupational Therapist and AT Consultant, Mason University Sterling, Virginia American Occupational Therapy Association, Lori Geist Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • A Middleware Framework for Application-Aware and User-Specific Energy Optimization in Smart Mobile Devices
    Pervasive and Mobile Computing 20 (2015) 47–63 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Pervasive and Mobile Computing journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pmc A middleware framework for application-aware and user-specific energy optimization in smart mobile devices Sudeep Pasricha a,∗, Brad K. Donohoo b, Chris Ohlsen c a Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA b U.S. Department of the Air Force, Roy, UT 84067, UT 84067, USA c Woodward, Inc., Fort Collins, CO 80525, USA article info a b s t r a c t Article history: Mobile battery-operated devices are becoming an essential instrument for business, com- Received 5 August 2014 munication, and social interaction. In addition to the demand for an acceptable level of per- Received in revised form 22 December 2014 formance and a comprehensive set of features, users often desire extended battery lifetime. Accepted 7 January 2015 In fact, limited battery lifetime is one of the biggest obstacles facing the current utility and Available online 14 January 2015 future growth of increasingly sophisticated ``smart'' mobile devices. This paper proposes a novel application-aware and user-interaction aware energy optimization middleware Keywords: framework (AURA) for pervasive mobile devices. AURA optimizes CPU and screen back- Energy optimization Smart mobile systems light energy consumption while maintaining a minimum acceptable level of performance. Pervasive computing The proposed framework employs a novel Bayesian application classifier and management Machine learning strategies based on Markov Decision Processes and Q-Learning to achieve energy savings. Middleware Real-world user evaluation studies on Google Android based HTC Dream and Google Nexus One smartphones running the AURA framework demonstrate promising results, with up to 29% energy savings compared to the baseline device manager, and up to 5×savings over prior work on CPU and backlight energy co-optimization.
    [Show full text]
  • An Emerging Architecture in Smart Phones
    International Journal of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science Vol. 3, No. 2, 2018, pp. 29-38 http://www.aiscience.org/journal/ijeecs ARM Processor Architecture: An Emerging Architecture in Smart Phones Naseer Ahmad, Muhammad Waqas Boota * Department of Computer Science, Virtual University of Pakistan, Lahore, Pakistan Abstract ARM is a 32-bit RISC processor architecture. It is develop and licenses by British company ARM holdings. ARM holding does not manufacture and sell the CPU devices. ARM holding only licenses the processor architecture to interested parties. There are two main types of licences implementation licenses and architecture licenses. ARM processors have a unique combination of feature such as ARM core is very simple as compare to general purpose processors. ARM chip has several peripheral controller, a digital signal processor and ARM core. ARM processor consumes less power but provide the high performance. Now a day, ARM Cortex series is very popular in Smartphone devices. We will also see the important characteristics of cortex series. We discuss the ARM processor and system on a chip (SOC) which includes the Qualcomm, Snapdragon, nVidia Tegra, and Apple system on chips. In this paper, we discuss the features of ARM processor and Intel atom processor and see which processor is best. Finally, we will discuss the future of ARM processor in Smartphone devices. Keywords RISC, ISA, ARM Core, System on a Chip (SoC) Received: May 6, 2018 / Accepted: June 15, 2018 / Published online: July 26, 2018 @ 2018 The Authors. Published by American Institute of Science. This Open Access article is under the CC BY license.
    [Show full text]
  • SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 3:14-Cv-582-JD
    Case 3:14-cv-00582-JD Document 51 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 19 1 EDUARDO G. ROY (Bar No. 146316) DANIEL C. QUINTERO (Bar No. 196492) 2 JOHN R. HURLEY (Bar No. 203641) PROMETHEUS PARTNERS L.L.P. 3 220 Montgomery Street Suite 1094 San Francisco, CA 94104 4 Telephone: 415.527.0255 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 DANIEL NORCIA 7 UNITED STATES DISTIRCT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DANIEL NORCIA, on his own behalf and on Case No.: 3:14-cv-582-JD 10 behalf of all others similarly situated, SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION 11 Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT FOR: 12 v. 1. VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA CONSUMERS LEGAL REMEDIES 13 SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT, CIVIL CODE §1750, et seq. AMERICA, LLC, a New York Corporation, and 2. UNLAWFUL AND UNFAIR 14 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., BUSINESS PRACTICES, a New Jersey Corporation, CALIFORNIA BUS. & PROF. CODE 15 §17200, et seq. Defendants. 3. FALSE ADVERTISING, 16 CALIFORNIA BUS. & PROF. CODE §17500, et seq. 17 4. FRAUD 18 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 3:14-cv-582-JD Case 3:14-cv-00582-JD Document 51 Filed 11/10/14 Page 2 of 19 1 Plaintiff DANIEL NORCIA, having not previously amended as a matter of course pursuant to 2 Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(1)(B), hereby exercises that right by amending within 21 days of service of 3 Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss filed October 20, 2014 (ECF 45). 4 Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Daniel Norcia complains and alleges, 5 by and through his attorneys, upon personal knowledge and information and belief, as follows: 6 NATURE OF THE ACTION 7 1.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2010 Admob Mobile Metrics Report
    AdMob Mobile Metrics Report AdMob serves ads for more than 15,000 mobile Web sites and applications around the world. AdMob stores and analyzes the data from every ad request, impression, and click and uses this to optimize ad matching in its network. This monthly report offers a snapshot of its data to provide insight into trends in the mobile ecosystem. February 2010 Find archived reports and sign up for future report notifications at metrics.admob.com. AdMob Mobile Metrics Report February 2010 New and Noteworthy For this month's report, we separate the traffic in our network into three categories – smartphones, feature phones, and mobile Internet devices – to examine the growth rates of each over the past year and look at the traffic share of smartphone operating systems and manufacturers of feature phones. * In February 2010, smartphones accounted for 48% of AdMob’s worldwide traffic, up from 35% in February 2009. The strong growth of iPhone and Android traffic, fueled by heavy application usage, was primarily responsible for the increase. In absolute terms, smartphone traffic increased 193% over the last year. * Feature phones declined from 58% to 35% of AdMob's total traffic as users began switching to smartphones. Although the share of traffic from feature phones as a category declined, in absolute terms traffic grew 31% year-over-year. * The mobile Internet devices category experienced the strongest growth of the three, increasing to account for 17% of traffic in AdMob’s network in February 2010. The iPod touch is responsible for 93% of this traffic; other devices include the Sony PSP and Nintendo DSi.
    [Show full text]
  • Apple TV 4Th Generation Teardown Guide ID: 49046 - Draft: 2021-04-21
    Apple TV 4th Generation Teardown Guide ID: 49046 - Draft: 2021-04-21 Apple TV 4th Generation Teardown Teardown of the fourth generation Apple TV on September 21, 2015. Written By: Sam Goldheart This document was generated on 2021-04-21 12:02:09 PM (MST). © iFixit — CC BY-NC-SA www.iFixit.com Page 1 of 14 Apple TV 4th Generation Teardown Guide ID: 49046 - Draft: 2021-04-21 INTRODUCTION Apple fans are doing the happy dance, what with a slew of new devices coming out of Cupertino— including the first new Apple TV in more than three years. Our teardown engineers look pretty happy too. That's because we've got our hands on a 4th generation Apple TV. That's right, kids. It's teardown time! Don't touch that dial—unless you're looking for more teardown news on our Facebook, Instagram, or Twitter. [video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSA8uFwptJc] TOOLS: iFixit Opening Picks set of 6 (1) Spudger (1) T7 Torx Screwdriver (1) T3 Torx Screwdriver (1) This document was generated on 2021-04-21 12:02:09 PM (MST). © iFixit — CC BY-NC-SA www.iFixit.com Page 2 of 14 Apple TV 4th Generation Teardown Guide ID: 49046 - Draft: 2021-04-21 Step 1 — Apple TV 4th Generation Teardown We like to start with some specs, and in this case a lot of the good stuff is packed into the fancypants new remote. The box itself contains: Dual-core, 64-bit Apple A8 chip Ethernet, 802.11a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi, IR receiver, and HDMI 1.4 connectivity ...whilst the remote is packing: Glass Touch surface Dual microphones Accelerometer and gyroscope Bluetooth 4.0, IR transmitter, Lightning connector This document was generated on 2021-04-21 12:02:09 PM (MST).
    [Show full text]
  • Three Ways of Seeing Improved Health and Productivity
    Three ways of seeing Key Features Galaxy Watch3 improved health and The Galaxy Watch3 is a premium solution that’s B2B-ready, with days of power and a rotating bezel that allows easy productivity. navigation even while wearing gloves. • Onboard GPS, motion, activity and heart-rate sensors • Battery lasts up to 56 hours (45mm model)2 • Carrier-agnostic LTE3 Take a look at the Samsung Galaxy • Tested to MIL-STD-810G standards,4 IP685, rated at 5 ATM Watch3, Galaxy Watch Active2, and Galaxy Watch Active. Galaxy Watch Active2 The premium Galaxy Watch3, the versatile Galaxy Watch Active, With a focus on wellness, the Galaxy Watch Active2 features and the health-oriented Galaxy Watch Active2 offer greater a digital touch bezel plus advanced sensors that enable health and productivity to virtually any enterprise. They’re more accurate blood pressure tracking, ECG tracking, 1 protected by Samsung Knox . And they’re all customizable to heart rate tracking, alerts, and fall detection. incorporate your company’s branding. Be more nimble. Be • Advanced sensors include heart rate tracker, ECG sensor, and 32G high more productive. Samsung Galaxy watches make it possible. sampling rate accelerometer and gyro • Battery lasts up to 60 hours (44mm model)2 • Carrier-agnostic LTE3 • Tested to MIL-STD-810G standards,4 IP685, rated at 5 ATM Galaxy Watch Active The Galaxy Watch Active offers secure communications in fast-paced environments, and supports corporate efficiency, productivity, health, and safety initiatives. • Advanced sleep tracking helps improve stress levels and sleep patterns • Battery lasts up to 45 hours2 • Tested to MIL-STD-810G standards,4 IP685, rated at 5 ATM Contact Us: samsung.com/wearablesforbiz Galaxy Watch3 Galaxy Watch Active2 Galaxy Watch Active “1.77”” x 1.82”” x 0.44”” (45.0 x 46.2 x 11.1 mm) 1.73" x 1.73" x 0.43" (44 x 44 x 10.9mm) Dimensions 1.56” x 1.56” x 0.41” (39.5 x 39.5 x 10.5mm) 1.61”” x 1.67”” x 0.44”” (41.0 x 42.5 x 11.3 mm)” 1.57" x 1.73" x 0.43" (40 x 40 x 10.9mm) Physical Weight 1.90 oz (53.8 g) /1.70 oz (48.2g) 1.7 oz.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey and Benchmarking of Machine Learning Accelerators
    1 Survey and Benchmarking of Machine Learning Accelerators Albert Reuther, Peter Michaleas, Michael Jones, Vijay Gadepally, Siddharth Samsi, and Jeremy Kepner MIT Lincoln Laboratory Supercomputing Center Lexington, MA, USA freuther,pmichaleas,michael.jones,vijayg,sid,[email protected] Abstract—Advances in multicore processors and accelerators components play a major role in the success or failure of an have opened the flood gates to greater exploration and application AI system. of machine learning techniques to a variety of applications. These advances, along with breakdowns of several trends including Moore’s Law, have prompted an explosion of processors and accelerators that promise even greater computational and ma- chine learning capabilities. These processors and accelerators are coming in many forms, from CPUs and GPUs to ASICs, FPGAs, and dataflow accelerators. This paper surveys the current state of these processors and accelerators that have been publicly announced with performance and power consumption numbers. The performance and power values are plotted on a scatter graph and a number of dimensions and observations from the trends on this plot are discussed and analyzed. For instance, there are interesting trends in the plot regarding power consumption, numerical precision, and inference versus training. We then select and benchmark two commercially- available low size, weight, and power (SWaP) accelerators as these processors are the most interesting for embedded and Fig. 1. Canonical AI architecture consists of sensors, data conditioning, mobile machine learning inference applications that are most algorithms, modern computing, robust AI, human-machine teaming, and users (missions). Each step is critical in developing end-to-end AI applications and applicable to the DoD and other SWaP constrained users.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Comparison of Application Processor (AP) Packaging 1 Table of Contents
    Application Processor for Smartphone Packaging Technology & Cost Review Advanced Packaging report by Stéphane ELISABETH November 2016 21 rue la Noue Bras de Fer 44200 NANTES - FRANCE +33 2 40 18 09 16 [email protected] www.systemplus.fr ©2016 System Plus Consulting | 2016 Comparison of Application Processor (AP) packaging 1 Table of Contents Overview / Introduction 3 Manufacturing Process Flow 73 o Executive Summary o Global Overview o AP I/O count & Footprint o Package Fabrication Unit o AP I/O count & L/S width Cost Analysis 76 o Reverse Costing Methodology o Synthesis of the cost analysis Company Profile 10 o Main Steps of Economic Analysis o Apple, Huawei, Samsung, Qualcomm o Yields Explanation & Hypotheses o Apple, Huawei, Samsung, Qualcomm AP history o Die cost 81 o Apple, Huawei, Samsung, Qualcomm Supply Chain History Front-End Cost o iPhone 7 Plus, Huawei P9, Samsung Galaxy S7 Teardown Wafer & Die Cost o PoP Packaging Technology o Package Manufacturing Cost 83 Physical Analysis 32 A10 Package Cost Breakdown o Synthesis of the Physical Analysis Kirin 955 Package Cost Breakdown o Physical Analysis Methodology Exynos 8 Package Cost Breakdown o A10, Kirin 955, Exynos 8, Snapdragon 820 Package 34 Snapdragon 820 Package Cost Breakdown Package Views & Dimensions o Component Cost 88 Wafer/Panel & Component Cost Package Opening Component Cost Breakdown Package Opening Comparison o PoP Cross-Section 47 Company services 91 Package Details Cross-Section Package Cross-Section Comparison o Die & Land-Side Decoupling Capacitor Comparison 66 Die View & Dimensions LSC Capacitor View & Dimensions LSC Capacitor Footprint Embedded LSC Capacitor Cross-Section Soldered LSC Capacitor Cross-Section o Summary of the physical Data 72 ©2016 System Plus Consulting | 2016 Comparison of Application Processor (AP) packaging 2 Executive Summary Overview / Introduction o Executive Summary • Located under the DRAM chip on the main board, the application processors (AP) are packaged using PoP o Reverse Costing Methodology technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Forensic Analysis of Smart Watches
    TALLINN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY School of Information Technologies Kehinde Omotola Adebayo (174449IVSB) DIGITAL FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF SMART WATCHES Bachelor’s Thesis Supervisor: Hayretdin Bahsi Research Professor Tallinn 2020 TALLINNA TEHNIKAÜLIKOOL Infotehnoloogia teaduskond Kehinde Omotola Adebayo (174449IVSB) NUTIKELLADE DIGITAALKRIMINALISTIKA Bachelor’s Thesis Juhendaja: Hayretdin Bahsi Research Professor Tallinn 2020 Author’s declaration of originality I hereby certify that I am the sole author of this thesis. All the used materials, references to the literature and the work of others have been referred to. This thesis has not been presented for examination anywhere else. Author: Kehinde Omotola Adebayo 30.04.2020 3 Abstract As wearable technology is becoming increasingly popular amongst consumers and projected to continue to increase in popularity they become probable significant source of digital evidence. One category of wearable technology is smart watches and they provide capabilities to receive instant messaging, SMS, email notifications, answering of calls, internet browsing, fitness tracking etc. which can be a great source of digital artefacts. The aim of this thesis is to analyze Samsung Gear S3 Frontier and Fitbit Versa Smartwatches, after which we present findings alongside the limitations encountered. Our result shows that we can recover significant artefacts from the Samsung Gear S3 Frontier, also more data can be recovered from Samsung Gear S3 Frontier than the accompanying mobile phone. We recovered significant data that can serve as digital evidence, we also provided a mapping that would enable investigators and forensic examiners work faster as they are shown where to look for information in the course of an investigation. We also presented the result of investigating Fitbit Versa significant artefacts like Heart rate, sleep, exercise and personal data like age, weight and height of the user of the device, this shows this device contains artefacts that might prove useful for forensic investigators and examiners.
    [Show full text]
  • Mise En Avant SPECIFICATIONS PRINCIPALES
    Apple iPhone 6(MQ3D2ZD/A) Apple iPhone 6 - Smartphone - 4G LTE - 32 Go - GSM - 4.7"- 1334 x 750 pixels (326 ppi) - Retina HD - 8 MP (caméra avant de 1,2 mégapixels) - gris L'iPhone 6 n'est pas seulement plus grand en taille. Il est plus grand en tout. Plus large,mais beaucoup plus fin. Plus puissant,mais remarquablement économe en énergie. Sa surface lisse métallique épouse à merveille le nouvel écran Retina. Sous son design profilé s'opère une fusion parfaite entre matériel et logiciel. Redessinée,affûtée,perfectionnée,une nouvelle génération d'iPhone est née. Mise en avant L'iPhone n'a jamais été aussi grand Pas juste un écran plus grand Formidablement puissant L'appareil qui a changé la photo révolutionne maintenant la vidéo Sans-fil plus rapide Votre doigt sur la sécurité Le plus grand des iOS Les atouts L'iPhone n'a jamais été aussi grand Pour développer un iPhone avec un écran plus grand et plus performant,il a fallu repousser plus loin les limites du design. Du mariage parfait du verre et du métal à l'épuration des lignes,le moindre détail a été soigneusement étudié et mis au service de votre utilisation. Ainsi,même avec son écran plus grand,l'iPhone 6 reste parfaitement calibré. Pas juste un écran plus grand C'est une chose que d'agrandir l'écran. C'en est une autre que de mettre au point un écran multi- touch plus grand aux couleurs éclatantes,au contraste accru,avec des angles de vision encore plus larges. Formidablement puissant Le coprocesseur de mouvement M8 compile efficacement les données issues de capteurs innovants et d'un nouveau baromètre.
    [Show full text]
  • NEON Implementation of an Attribute-Based Encryption Scheme
    NEON implementation of an attribute-based encryption scheme Ana Helena S´anchez, Francisco Rodr´ıguez-Henr´ıquez? Computer Science Department, CINVESTAV-IPN, M´exico [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. In 2011, Waters presented a ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption protocol that uses bilinear pairings to provide control access mechanisms, where the set of user's attributes is specified by means of a linear secret sharing scheme. Some of the applications foreseen for this protocol lie in the context of mobile devices such a smartphones and tablets, which in a majority of instances are powered by an ARM pro- cessor supporting the NEON vector set of instructions. In this paper we present the design of a software cryptographic library that implements a 127-bit security level attribute-based encryption scheme over mobile devices equipped with a 1.4GHz Exynos 4 Cortex-A9 processor and a developing board that hosts a 1.7 GHz Exynos 5 Cortex-A15 processor. For the latter platform and taking advantage of the inherent parallelism of the NEON vector instructions, our library computes a single optimal pairing over a Barreto-Naehrig curve approximately 2 times faster than the best timings previously reported on ARM platforms at this level of security. Further, using a 6-attribute access formula our library is able to encrypt/decrypt a text/ciphertext in less than 4:49mS and 15:67mS, respectively. Key words: Atribute Based-Encryption, Optimal-Ate pairing, Barreto- Naehrig curves, ARM processor, pairing-based protocols, elliptic curve scalar multiplication. 1 Introduction It was long assumed that the task of computing a single bilinear pairing was rather expensive, so much so that when assessing the complexity of a given protocol, a designer could safely ignore the computational cost of all the other cryptographic components.
    [Show full text]