DOCSLIB.ORG

Fire Growth Maps for the 1988 Greater Yellowstone Area Fires

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

United States Department of Agriculture Fire Growth Maps Forest Service Intermountain for the 1988 Greater Research Station General Technical Report INT-304 Yellowstone Area Fires January 1994 Richard C. Rothermel Roberta A. Hartford Carolyn H. Chase THE AUTHORS organizations. Without their support this comprehen- sive project would not have been possible. RICHARD C. ROTHERMEL is a senior scientist at the lntermountain Fire Sciences Laboratory in Missoula, The Denver office of the National Park Service, for its MT. He served 26 years as Project Leader of the Fire assistance in installing hardware and software, GRASS Behavior Research Work Unit there. Rothermel has and UNlX training, preparing data tapes compatible degrees from the University of Washington (B.S. with our computer system, and continued support in aeronautical engineering, 1953) and Colorado State problem resolution. University (MS. mechanical engineering, 1971). He The Boise office of the National Park Service, for has published and lectured extensively both in the lending its work station to start the project before United States and abroad. His most notable contribu- purchase of our machine. tion has been the development of a fire spread model Yellowstone National Park, for lending the wall map that has been used as the basis for the National Fire assembled at park headquarters in Mammoth during Danger Rating System and several other systems the summer of 1988, preparing additional data for that require an estimate of fire behavior. Rothermel transfer to our system, helping locate missing data, and is working with scientists in Australia and Canada to accepting the responsibility to distribute the electronic develop models for the next generation of fire behavior data. and fire danger systems. Andy Norman from the Bridger-Teton National Forest for interpreting fire growth on the Huck and Mink Fires ROBERTA A. HARTFORD is a forester at the lnter- and providing maps of those fires. mountain Fire Sciences Laboratory in Missoula, MT. The U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Depart- She began working at the Fire Lab in 1968, assisting ment of the Interior for partially funding this work from with studies on the chemical and physical properties of the grant for Greater Yellowstone Area postfire re- fuels. During the early 1970's she also worked season- sponse studies. ally in fuel inventory and taught high school science. The GIs Laboratory at Central Washington Univer- Since 1976 she has remained at the Fire Lab where sity, Ellensburg, for digitizing the initial data from the she has been involved in studies of fuels and fuel bed headquarters wall map. properties, smoldering combustion, and fire behavior of both laboratory and wi!d!and fires. Recent work includes studies in the use of satellite remote sensing RESEARCH SUMMARY to assess fire potential in wildland vegetation and the The growth of the 1988 fires in the Greater use of geographic information systems to document Yellowstone Area from June 14 to October 1 has been wildfire growth. She has a B.A. degree in zoology digitized and displayed in the form of daily fire growth from the University of Montana in Missoula and an maps. A geographic information system (GIs) was MS. degree in forestry there. used to process the data for distribution and analysis. CAROLYN H. CHASE is a mathematician stationed The fire record integrates information and data from a at the lntermountain Fire Sciences Laboratory. She variety of sources, including daily infrared photography received her B.A. degree in mathematics from the flights, satellite imagery, ground and aerial reconnais- University of Montana in 1969. Chase began working sance, command center intelligence, and the personal at the Fire Lab in 1978; she is a member of the sys- recollections of fire behavior observers. Using GRASS tems development and application team. Her current GIs software, fire position was digitized from topo- work includes integration of geographic information graphic maps to construct a file of daily fire location in system technology for the next generation of fire vector format. The vector file was converted to raster danger and fire behavior prediction systems. format for further analysis. The data base is available in electronic form. A summary of the growth of the fire and points of interest throughout the summer is included. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors gratefully acknowledge the valuable assistance of many individuals in the following Cover: The cover shows the daily growth of the 1988 Yellowstone Fires. Each color represents one day's growth. Intermountain Research Station 324 25th Street Ogden, UT 84401 Fire Growth Ma~sfor the 1988 Greater ell ow stone Area Fires Richard C. Rothermel Roberta A. Hartford Carolyn H. Chase 1 INTRODUCTION with red indicating growth on the last day of the week. These data are available in electronic format. In the summer of 1988, Yellowstone National Park Appendix B describes how to obtain the data set and and adjoining areas within the National Forests, gives details about file contents, formats, and sizes. commonly referred to as the Greater Yellowstone One of the key elements of this work has been a II Area (fig. I), experienced the most extensive forest comprehensive effort to resolve conflicting or incom- fires seen in the Western States since the great plete data and to develop maps accurately depicting Northwest fires of 1910. As the summer progressed the growth of the fires. Considerable thought and and the fires continued to spread unabated, it be- care were given to preparation 6f the fire growth came apparent that unprecedented opportunities for map, but there are many potential sources of error; studying large-fire behavior were at hand. However, the data should not be considered to be the absolute the very size, intensity, and remoteness of the fires, truth. Boundaries, streams, and sites used for refer- as well as widespread smoke, made personal obser- ence at map production scales were taken from a va- vation and mapping all but impossible. Fortunately, riety of sources and were digitized at a variety of there was a strong effort to map fire progress for use scales. These results should not be considered for in strategic and tactical fire planning. determining legal questions such as whether or when National Parks and National Forests forming the a fire burned a particular feature. If readers have Greater Yellowstone Area include Yellowstone Na- additional data or corrections they feel should be in- tional Park, Grand Teton National Park, and por- cluded in the data set, contact the authors with the tions of the Custer, Targhee, Bridger-Teton, Gallatin, details. All suggested additions or corrections will be Beaverhead, and Shoshone National Forests. Major evaluated early in 1995 and published if warranted. fires included~~ ~ ~~ in the~ data~~~~ set are the North Fork- Wolf Lake, Fan, Hellroaring, Storm Creek, Clover- MAP PREPARATION Mist, Huck, Mink and the Snake Complex, consist- ing of the Falls, Red, and Shoshone Fires. The initial data were taken from a large wall map A research effort was initiated soon after the fires assembled from Department of the Interior, U.S. were over to reconstruct the fire behavior and the Geological Survey quadrangle maps (quads) at Yel- conditions that produced 3 months of large-fire lowstone National Park Headquarters at Mammoth. growth. The purpose was to put together a data set The location of the fires was recorded on this map, suitable for analyzing large-fire growth. Of particu- to the extent possible, each day throughout the sum- lar importance to further study are growth progres- mer. Figure 2 shows quad coverage over the fire sion, rates of spread, and relation of fire progress to area. The data were obtained primarily from air- weather and terrain. craft using infrared (IR) scanners. Two aircraft he GRASS (U.S. Army Construction Engineering were available until late August, when one was sent Research Laboratory 1988) geographic information to other fires. Unfortunately, the largest fire growth system (GIs) software was used to store and orga- was taking place at this time, and one aircraft could nize the data. The growth layer produced by the not cover all of the active fire perimeter in one night GIs contains polygons made up of perimeters repre- of flying. Areas on the Snake Complex in the south, senting the fire position, each with the single at- the Clover-Mist Fire in the eastern section, and the tribute of date. A complete set of fire growth maps North Fork-Wolf Lake Fire were not well mapped is shown in appendix A. Those maps show the daily late in the summer. fire growth summarized by week. Each color indi- The majority of daily fire positions on the head- cates a different day's growth. Fire growth previous quarters map couldbe verified with IR overlays or to the current week is shown in black, lakes and with chronology information (USDA.USDI 1988). streams are blue; roads are brown. Daily colors Daily fire growth prior to centralized mapping (and grade from "cool" early in the week, through "warm," between IR flights) was reconstructed with the help Figure 1-This figure shows the final perimeters of the 1988 fires in the Greater Yellowstone Area. The colored boxes indicate areas covered by the maps in append~xA. Yellowstone National Park is outlined in black. Mount Mount Mount Cowen Douglas Wood Crown Mount Cutoff Cooke Bune Miner Gardiner Wallace Mountain w . I Tepee Mount Tower Abiathar Pilot Beartooth Deep Creek Holmes Mammoth Junction Butte Lake m . w w m m . I Dead West Madison Norris Canyon Pelican Sunlight Indian Yellowstone Junction Junction Village Peak w . Buffalo Old West Lake Faithful Thumb Peak B W 8 W W Grassy Lake- Huckleberry- Mount Two Ocean Reservoir Mountain ~anmck- Pass w Figure 2-Names and locations of U.S.
Recommended publications
  • Fire Vulnerability Assessment for Mendocino County ______

    Fire Vulnerability Assessment for Mendocino County ______

    FIRE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR MENDOCINO COUNTY ____________________________________________ _________________________________________ August 2020 Mendocino County Fire Vulnerability Assessment ________________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION I- OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................... 6 A. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 6 B. Project Objectives ...................................................................................................................... 6 C. Mendocino County Description and Demographics ................................................................ 7 D. Planning Area Basis .................................................................................................................. 8 SECTION II- COUNTY WILDFIRE ASSESSMENT ............................................................ 9 A. Wildfire Threat ......................................................................................................................... 9 B. Weather/Climate ........................................................................................................................ 9 C. Topography ............................................................................................................................. 10 D. Fuel Hazards ..........................................................................................................................
  • Scott Mclean: from the CAL FIRE Information Center, I'm Scott Mclean with the CAL FIRE Report for Monday, August 26, 2019. La

    Scott Mclean: from the CAL FIRE Information Center, I'm Scott Mclean with the CAL FIRE Report for Monday, August 26, 2019. La

    Scott McLean: From the CAL FIRE Information Center, I’m Scott McLean with the CAL FIRE Report for Monday, August 26, 2019. Last week, amid yet another week of triple digit temperatures, California firefighters saw a steady flow of new wildfires. In total, 202 new fires started statewide, across all jurisdictions. Of those 202, 164 were within CAL FIRE’s jurisdiction. Switching over to our Statewide Fire Map, you can see that there are currently 4 active wildfires with most of those in Northern California. Let’s take a closer look at a few of those active fires, starting with the Mountain Fire in Shasta County. The Mountain Fire started on Thursday, August 22 north of Bella Vista. Within just a few hours, it grew to 600 acres and led to the evacuation of several surrounding communities. However, thanks to the aggressive initial attack by firefighters, the Mountain Fire was kept from growing further, and residents were able to return home relatively quickly. The Mountain Fire currently remains at 600 acres, and is 95% contained. Next up, another fire started yesterday along the California-Mexico border. This one is known as the Border 10 Fire and is burning along the area east of the Otay port of entry, about half a mile south of the border. The Border 10 fire did cross over into the US, but firefighters were able to quickly stop its spread at 20 acres. The Border 10 fire is currently 75% contained. And lastly, we have the Long Valley Fire which started over the weekend off Highway 395 north of the Hallelujah Junction.
  • Risk Management Committee Safety Gram 2018

    Risk Management Committee Safety Gram 2018

    SAFETY GRAM 2018 Fatalities, Entrapments and Accident Summary for 2018 (http://www.nwcg.gov/committees/risk-management-committee/resources) The following data indicates the fatalities, entrapments, burnovers and fire shelter deployments during calendar year 2018. The information was collected by the Wildland Fire Lessons Learned Center and verified by the NWCG Risk Management Committee. Fatalities Incident Name Agency/Entity Number # Date Type of Jurisdiction Activity of Personnel of Shelters Fatalities Injuries/Treatment Accident Location Involved People Deployed 1/26 Puerto Rico Pack Test Work Capacity Test Local Government Medical 1 1 Cardiac Arrest Fatality Arduous San Juan Puerto Rico 2/28 Water Tender Accident Initial Attack Local Government Vehicle 3 1 2 injured, 1 fatality Fatality VFD New London TX 3/10 Grass Fire Fatality UNK Local Government UNK 1 1 Incident date: 3/10 Ellinger VFD (Suspected Medical) Deceased: 3/23 TX 3/12 Hazard Tree Mitigation Chainsaw Federal Medical 1 1 Fell unconscious, Fatality Operations USFS transported to Olympic NF hospital. Deceased WA 3/15 Grass Fire Fatality Initial Attack Local Government Medical 1 1 Fell ill and collapsed UNK Heart Attack on 3/16. OH Deceased: 3/16 1 Incident Name Agency/Entity Number # Date Type of Jurisdiction Activity of Personnel of Shelters Fatalities Injuries/Treatment Accident Location Involved People Deployed 4/12 Shaw Fire Initial Attack Local Government Entrapment 2 1 1 fatality; 1 FF with Cheyenne 2nd degree burns. OK 4/18 Rocky Mount Fatality Initial Attack Local Government Medical 1 1 Neck and back pain VA VFD on 4/18. Deceased: 4/19 4/21 Training Hike Fatality Fitness Training State Medical 1 1 Collapsed, treated on CA Dept.
  • Fire Management Lessons Learned – Evolving Fire Management Programs 1

    Fire Management Lessons Learned – Evolving Fire Management Programs 1

    Fire Management Lessons Learned Evolving Fire Management Programs on the George Washington and Jefferson National Forests of Virginia, West Virginia, and Kentucky and Sequoia National Forest and Giant Sequoia National Monument of California Prepared for U.S. Forest Service Washington Office and Wildland Fire Lessons Learned Center By Carol Ewell and David Kerr, with contributions by Scott Williams – Adaptive Management Services Enterprise Team (AMSET) and Frankie Romero and Tim Sexton – U.S. Forest Service November 2013 Fire Management Lessons Learned – Evolving Fire Management Programs 1 Contents Executive Summary…………………………………….………... 3 1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 2. George Washington and Jefferson National Forests……………………………………… 7 Theme 1: Organizational Culture……………………………………………………………… 7 Theme 2: Safety……………………………………………………………………………………..… 19 Theme 3: Economics……………………………………………………………………………..…. 21 Theme 4: Natural Resource Effects and Data Modeling…………………….…….. 22 3. Sequoia National Forest and Giant Sequoia National Monument…………..……… 29 Theme 1: Organizational Culture……………………………………………………………… 29 Theme 2: Safety………………………………………………………………………………..……… 40 Theme 3: Economics…………………………………………………………………………..……. 40 Theme 4: Natural Resource Effects and Data Modeling………………………..….. 43 4. National Goals Tie Ecosystem Restoration Together with Fire and Fuel Management…………………………………………………………..………. 47 5. Lessons Learned…………………………………………………………………………………..……….. 48 6. Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………………..…….……. 51 7. References……………………………………………………………………………………………..…….
  • Wildland Fire in Ecosystems: Effects of Fire on Fauna

    Wildland Fire in Ecosystems: Effects of Fire on Fauna

    United States Department of Agriculture Wildland Fire in Forest Service Rocky Mountain Ecosystems Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-42- volume 1 Effects of Fire on Fauna January 2000 Abstract _____________________________________ Smith, Jane Kapler, ed. 2000. Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on fauna. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 1. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 83 p. Fires affect animals mainly through effects on their habitat. Fires often cause short-term increases in wildlife foods that contribute to increases in populations of some animals. These increases are moderated by the animals’ ability to thrive in the altered, often simplified, structure of the postfire environment. The extent of fire effects on animal communities generally depends on the extent of change in habitat structure and species composition caused by fire. Stand-replacement fires usually cause greater changes in the faunal communities of forests than in those of grasslands. Within forests, stand- replacement fires usually alter the animal community more dramatically than understory fires. Animal species are adapted to survive the pattern of fire frequency, season, size, severity, and uniformity that characterized their habitat in presettlement times. When fire frequency increases or decreases substantially or fire severity changes from presettlement patterns, habitat for many animal species declines. Keywords: fire effects, fire management, fire regime, habitat, succession, wildlife The volumes in “The Rainbow Series” will be published during the year 2000. To order, check the box or boxes below, fill in the address form, and send to the mailing address listed below.
  • CAL FIRE 2014 Madera Mariposa Merced Unit

    CAL FIRE 2014 Madera Mariposa Merced Unit

    Last update: 1 Feb 2012 UNIT STRATEGIC FIRE PLAN AMENDMENTS Page Numbers Description Updated Date Section Updated Updated of Update By 4/14 Contents Page ii 2014 Update P4224 5/14 Signature Page 1 Annual Update C4200 4/13 Executive Summary 2 Re-Write C4200 5/13 I 3-6 Re-Write 4200 5/14 II 7-8 Update P4224 4/13 III 9-10 Re-Write NK 4/13 IV 11-19 Update B4220 5/14 V 20-38 Update All Battalions 4/14 Appendix A 39-43 Update F4207 4/14 Appendix B 44 Update C4200 4/13 Appendix C 45-49 Update JP 4/13 Appendix C-1 50 Update JP 4/14 Appendix D 51 Update C4201 4/14 Appendix E 52 Update B4220 4/14 Appendix F 55-56 Update B4211 4/14 Appendix G 57-60 Update B4212 4/14 Appendix H 57-60 Update B4214 4/14 Appendix I 61-62 Update B4215 4/14 Appendix J 63-65 Update B16 4/14 Appendix K 66 Update B17 4/14 Appendix L 67-68 Update B18 4/13 Appendix M 69 Update JP 4/13 Exhibits: Maps 70-77 Update JP 6/1 Accomplishments 78-80 Re-Write P4224 i Last update: 1 May 2014 Table of Contents Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... ii SIGNATURE PAGE .................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 2 SECTION I: UNIT OVERVIEW .................................................................................................. 3 UNIT DESCRIPTION ...........................................................................................................
  • Santa Cruz County San Mateo County

    Santa Cruz County San Mateo County

    Santa Cruz County San Mateo County COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Prepared by: CALFIRE, San Mateo — Santa Cruz Unit The Resource Conservation District for San Mateo County and Santa Cruz County Funding provided by a National Fire Plan grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through the California Fire Safe Council. M A Y - 2 0 1 0 Table of Contents Executive Summary.............................................................................................................1 Purpose.................................................................................................................................2 Background & Collaboration...............................................................................................3 The Landscape .....................................................................................................................6 The Wildfire Problem ..........................................................................................................8 Fire History Map................................................................................................................10 Prioritizing Projects Across the Landscape .......................................................................11 Reducing Structural Ignitability.........................................................................................12 x Construction Methods............................................................................................13 x Education ...............................................................................................................15
  • 2018 Strategic Fire Plan

    2018 Strategic Fire Plan

    SShhaassttaa--TTrriinniittyy UUnniitt 22001188 SSTTRRAATTEEGGIICC FFIIRREE PPLLAANN UNIT STRATEGIC FIRE PLAN AMENDMENTS Page Numbers Description of Updated Date Section Updated Updated Update By 12/22/12 Appendix A Update to Projects DW 12/22/12 Appendix B Update Goals and Objectives DW 12/22/12 Appendix C Added Communities at risk DW 12/22/12 Appendix D Update Maps DW 4/5/14 Section Il Update Collaborators DW 4/5/14 Section Ill Update Values and Communities DW 4/5/14 Section V Added Camp, LaTour DW 4/5/14 Appendix A Update Project List DW 4/5/14 Appendix C Add Ignition Analysis DW 4/5/14 2013 Supplemental Add 2013 Supplement DW 4/09/15 Appendix C Updated Ignition Analysis DB 4/23/15 Appendix A Updated CalMAPPER Chart DB 4/09/16 Appendix A 40 Updated CalMAPPER Chart DB 4/09/16 New Plan Template 1-50 Utilized New Blank template DB 4/17/16 Appendix C 42 Updated Ignition Analysis DB 4/17/16 2015 Supplemental 50 Unit Accomplishments Page DB 2/1/17 Section V Update Battalion JWB 2/9/17 Appendix C 42 Updated Ignition Analysis JWB 2/15/17 Appendix A 39 Updated Project List JWB 3/2/17 2016 Supplemental 49 Unit Accomplishments Page JWB 3/28/17 All Sections 1-48 Update Fire Plan Doc JWB 2/5/18 All Sections Updated Document Format NW 2/5/18 Section 2 10 Update Communities at Risk NW 4/10/18 Section 2 9 Update Collaborators NW 2/6/18 Appendix B 38 Update Ignition Analysis NW 3/6/18 Appendix B 37 Update Goals and Objective NW 4/10/18 Appendix A 36 Updated Unit Project List NW 4/25/18 Section V 34 Updated LaTour Information NW 5/1/18 Cover New Cover Page NW 5/2/18 2017 Supplemental 48 Update Unit Accomplishments NW i Last update:May 10, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................................
  • Pole Creek and Bald Mountain Fires Facilitated Learning Analysis

    Pole Creek and Bald Mountain Fires Facilitated Learning Analysis

    Pole Creek and Bald Mountain Fires Facilitated Learning Analysis The Pole Creek Fire on September 12, 2018. “‘Modified Suppression’ is a spectrum. ‘Confine/Contain’ is the creation of a box. They are not synonymous, yet not dissimilar.” Type 3 Incident Commander “Without planning for the worst-case scenario, we were constantly behind the power curve.” Firing Boss “We’re operating so far out of climatology. I’ve never seen it before.” Great Basin Predictive Services “I have never seen this before! How do we learn from this and act differently?” Forest Supervisor 1 2 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Background: UWF Fire Response Culture ................................................................................................. 6 The Story ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 The Bald Mountain Fire ............................................................................................................................. 7 August 24: Bald Mountain Fire, the Early Days......................................................................................... 8 September 6: Pole Creek Fire Ignites ........................................................................................................ 9 September 7: Implementing the Plan ....................................................................................................
  • Community Wildfire Protection Plan Prepared By

    Community Wildfire Protection Plan Prepared By

    Santa Cruz County San Mateo County COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Prepared by: CALFIRE, San Mateo — Santa Cruz Unit The Resource Conservation District for San Mateo County and Santa Cruz County Funding provided by a National Fire Plan grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through the California Fire Safe Council. APRIL - 2 0 1 8 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 3 Background & Collaboration ............................................................................................... 4 The Landscape .................................................................................................................... 7 The Wildfire Problem ........................................................................................................10 Fire History Map ............................................................................................................... 13 Prioritizing Projects Across the Landscape .......................................................................14 Reducing Structural Ignitability .........................................................................................16 • Construction Methods ........................................................................................... 17 • Education .............................................................................................................
  • Damage and Mortality Assessment of Redwood and Mixed Conifer Forest Types in Santa Cruz County Following Wildfire

    Damage and Mortality Assessment of Redwood and Mixed Conifer Forest Types in Santa Cruz County Following Wildfire

    Damage and Mortality Assessment of Redwood and Mixed Conifer Forest Types in Santa Cruz County Following Wildfire Steve R. Auten1 and Nadia Hamey1 Abstract On August 12, 2009, the Lockheed Fire ignited the west slope of the Santa Cruz Mountains burning approximately 7,819 acres. A mixture of vegetation types were in the path of the fire, including approximately 2,420 acres of redwood forest and 1,951 acres of mixed conifer forest types representative of the Santa Cruz Mountains. Foresters and land managers were left with tough decisions on how to treat tree damage and mortality compounded by the Pine Mountain Fire which occurred in the same area in 1948. Big Creek Lumber Company (BCL), Cal Poly’s Swanton Pacific Ranch (SPR) and other professionals familiar with this region of redwood teamed up to develop a method for evaluating damage and mortality. Qualitative criteria for evaluating stand damage focused on historic defect, cambial death, root damage, and associated fire intensity. Quantitative damage criteria was used to contrive three mortality assessment tables, broken up by diameter class (1 through 8, 9 through 16, 17+), for all tree species and tested against 83, 1/5th acre fixed plots from SPR’s Continuous Forest Inventory. Since the initial mortality evaluation using the new tables in fall of 2009, each of the 2877 trees have been re-evaluated in spring 2010 and spring 2011. Accuracy against the initial evaluation is 89.3 percent. Key words: damage, hardwood, mortality, redwood Introduction What should be harvested to encourage regeneration of selectively-managed forestland in the Southern Subdistrict of the Coast Forest District following wildfire? What determines tree mortality for the purpose of amending the sustainability analysis (SA) of a Non-industrial Timber Management Plan (NTMP) following wildfire? Charged with managing and maintaining the health and vigor of the forest ecosystem, foresters and land managers need an accurate way of field-evaluating damage and mortality in conifers and hardwoods immediately following wildfire.
  • Sonoma County Community Wildfire Protection Plan

    Sonoma County Community Wildfire Protection Plan

    Sonoma County Community Wildfire Protection Plan FIRE SAFE SONOMA Disclaimer Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view(s) of any governmental agency, organization, corporation or individual with which the authors may be affiliated. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. The Sonoma County Community Wildfire Prevention Plan (the Plan) is a work in progress. Various changes are anticipated throughout the Plan over the next several years. Readers are urged to consult with their own agencies having jurisdiction regarding the use or implementation of this Plan, as well as their own legal counsel on matters of concern. While the publisher and authors have used their best efforts in preparing this Plan, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by receiving this publication. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your specific situation. The publisher, sponsors and authors shall not be liable for any loss of profit or any other damages, including but not limited to, special incidental and/or consequential damages. This Plan is not to be construed as indicative of project “activity” as defined under the “Community Guide to the California Environmental Quality Act, Chapter Three; Projects Subject to CEQA.” Because the Sonoma County CWPP does not legally commit any public agency to a specific course of action or conduct and thus, is not a project subject to CEQA or NEPA.