DOCSLIB.ORG

TIGER Grant History As the BNSF Line Serving the Southwest Chief Is Not A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TIGER Grant History As the BNSF Line Serving the Southwest Chief Is Not A TIGER Grant History As the BNSF line serving the Southwest Chief is not a major freight route, the conditions of the rail were deteriorating which led to BNSF to reduce the speed limit on the route from 79 to 60 mph and it was highly probable that the speed limit could be further reduced to 30 mph. This caused concerns with Amtrak, due to the ability to complete the Chicago to Los Angeles run in 24 hours. Major improvements were needed to restore the overall speed and reliability of the line as well as the ride quality experienced by Amtrak’s passengers. There were also rumors regarding BNSF having an interest in divesting of their route through western Kansas. In January 2010, BNSF offered to reroute the Southwest Chief to other freight routes, thereby eliminating the Southwest Chief between Newton KS and Lamy NM. At that time, Amtrak chose to maintain the current service and pay the additional maintenance costs. In 2011, BNSF estimated that the 10-year capital investment needed for Amtrak to preserve the entire 636 miles of the Southwest Chief from Newton, KS to Lamy, NM was $300 million. Garden City officials met with BNSF officials, Kansas Senate President Steve Morris and KDOT officials on January 25, 2012, regarding future intentions along the La Junta subdivision. BNSF stated that this line will stay in their ownership. From that early 2012 meeting, the Southwest Chief Rural Rail Partnership was born and a phased approach to rehabilitation of the route was conceived. The Partnership includes municipal governments, county governments and other interested passenger rail organizations. The four participating cities in Kansas are Newton, Hutchinson, Dodge City and Garden City. In 2012, Garden City and Dodge City (TIGER applications have to be from a governmental unit) were unsuccessful co-applicants for $15 million in TIGER IV funding. A second attempt with Garden City as the applicant was made in 2013 for TIGER V funding, which was also unsuccessful. Finally, the 2014 TIGER VI application submitted by Garden City was approved. This was the first year the BNSF participated in funding. The ‘local’ match was $9.3 million against a Federal award of $12.5 million. That initial replaced 40 miles of track between Pierceville and Las Animas. In 2015, the City of La Junta CO was the applicant for a successful TIGER VII grant. They matched $9.2 million against $15.2 million in Federal funds. The project replaced an additional 38 miles of track in Kansas and Colorado and replaced 18.5 miles of ties and ballast in New Mexico. The City of Lamar CO submitted an unsuccessful TIGER VIII application in 2016. The grant was not awarded. It requested $31 million with a match of $10.1 million to complete the remaining 60 miles of track replacement in Kansas and Colorado and tie replacement and other upgrades New Mexico. Colfax County NM (Raton) submitted the 2017 TIGER IX application. The project includes 29 miles of track replacement in Colorado. In New Mexico, the project includes some centralized traffic control around Lamy, a new switch and drainage improvements on the Lamy siding, track replacement and a rock slide fence at Devil’s Throne, and replacement of ties between Lamy and Trinidad. The local match is $9.16 million against the $16 million grant. With completion of TIGER IX, there will only be 27 miles still needing replacement between Hutchinson & La Junta, between Pierceville and Howell. The four western Kansas cities served by Amtrak, Newton, Hutchinson, Dodge City and Garden City, contributed to all three TIGER grant matches. The Kansas Department of Transportation participated in all three TIGER Grants, with $3 million on TIGER VI and $1 million each for TIGERS VII and IX..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Super Chief – El Capitan See Page 4 for Details
    AUGUST- lyerlyer SEPTEMBER 2020 Ready for Boarding! Late 1960s Combined Super Chief – El Capitan see page 4 for details FLYER SALE ENDS 9-30-20 Find a Hobby Shop Near You! Visit walthers.com or call 1-800-487-2467 WELCOME CONTENTS Chill out with cool new products, great deals and WalthersProto Super Chief/El Capitan Pages 4-7 Rolling Along & everything you need for summer projects in this issue! Walthers Flyer First Products Pages 8-10 With two great trains in one, reserve your Late 1960s New from Walthers Pages 11-17 Going Strong! combined Super Chief/El Capitan today! Our next HO National Model Railroad Build-Off Pages 18 & 19 Railroads have a long-standing tradition of getting every last WalthersProto® name train features an authentic mix of mile out of their rolling stock and engines. While railfans of Santa Fe Hi-Level and conventional cars - including a New From Our Partners Pages 20 & 21 the 1960s were looking for the newest second-generation brand-new model, new F7s and more! Perfect for The Bargain Depot Pages 22 & 23 diesels and admiring ever-bigger, more specialized freight operation or collection, complete details start on page 4. Walthers 2021 Reference Book Page 24 cars, a lot of older equipment kept rolling right along. A feature of lumber traffic from the 1960s to early 2000s, HO Scale Pages 25-33, 36-51 Work-a-day locals and wayfreights were no less colorful, the next run of WalthersProto 56' Thrall All-Door Boxcars N Scale Pages 52-57 with a mix of earlier engines and equipment that had are loaded with detail! Check out these layout-ready HO recently been repainted and rebuilt.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Bill Policy Committee Analysis
    SJR 30 Page 1 Date of Hearing: August 23, 2018 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION Jim Frazier, Chair SJR 30 (McGuire) – As Introduced August 9, 2018 SENATE VOTE: 33-0 SUBJECT: Amtrak National Network. SUMMARY: Urges the Congress and the President of the United States to support the retention of, and investment in, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) National Network of passenger trains and for Congress to reject the President’s proposed budget cuts to Amtrak. Specifically, this resolution: 1) Makes findings and declarations including the history of Amtrak in the United States and its importance to the State of California that WHEREAS: a) Amtrak was created in 1970 to assume the common carriers’ obligations of the private railroads and provide intercity passenger rail service throughout the United States; and, b) Amtrak’s mission is to deliver intercity transportation that helps move people, the economy, and the nation forward; and, c) Amtrak operates a nationwide rail network, serving more than 500 destinations in 46 states, the District of Columbia, and three Canadian provinces, in addition to serving as a contractor in various capacities for several commuter rail agencies; and, d) Amtrak National Network trains are often the only form of public transportation available to thousands of small communities nationwide, and are a vital link between urban and rural America; and, e) The State of California has a vested interest in the continued success of the local and national Amtrak network as it is home to three of the
    [Show full text]
  • 20210419 Amtrak Metrics Reporting
    NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION 30th Street Station Philadelphia, PA 19104 April 12, 2021 Mr. Michael Lestingi Director, Office of Policy and Planning Federal Railroad Administrator U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Lestingi: In accordance with the Metrics and Minimum Standards for Intercity Passenger Rail Service final rule published on November 16, 2020 (the “Final Rule”), this letter serves as Amtrak’s report to the Federal Railroad Administration that, as of April 10, 2021, Amtrak has provided the 29 host railroads over which Amtrak currently operates (listed in Appendix A) with ridership data for the prior month consistent with the Final Rule. The following data was provided to each host railroad: . the total number of passengers, by train and by day; . the station-specific number of detraining passengers, reported by host railroad whose railroad right-of-way serves the station, by train, and by day; and . the station-specific number of on-time passengers reported by host railroad whose railroad right- of-way serves the station, by train, and by day. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jim Blair Sr. Director, Host Railroads Amtrak cc: Dennis Newman Amtrak Jason Maga Amtrak Christopher Zappi Amtrak Yoel Weiss Amtrak Kristin Ferriter Federal Railroad Administration Mr. Michael Lestingi April 12, 2021 Page 2 Appendix A Host Railroads Provided with Amtrak Ridership Data Host Railroad1 Belt Railway Company of Chicago BNSF Railway Buckingham Branch Railroad
    [Show full text]
  • State of Alabama
    Amtrak Fact Sheet, Fiscal Year 2005 State of Illinois Amtrak Service & Ridership Amtrak serves Illinois with 50 daily trains including corridor services between Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Louis, Detroit, and many other major Midwest destinations. In addition, Amtrak operates the following long-distance trains through Illinois, all originating in Chicago: • The California Zephyr (daily Chicago-Oakland via Denver-Salt Lake City) • The Capitol Limited (daily Chicago-Cleveland-Pittsburgh-Washington, D.C.) • The Cardinal (three-times-weekly Chicago-Cincinnati-Washington, D.C.) • The City of New Orleans (daily Chicago-Memphis-New Orleans) • The Empire Builder (daily Chicago-St. Paul-Seattle/Portland) • The Lake Shore Limited (daily Chicago-Cleveland-Buffalo-Boston/New York) • The Southwest Chief (daily Chicago-Kansas City-Los Angeles) • The Texas Eagle (daily Chicago-St. Louis-Dallas-San Antonio, tri-weekly through car service to Los Angeles via the Sunset Limited) The Three Rivers (Chicago-Akron-Pittsburgh-Philadelphia-New York) was discontinued on 3/7/05. During FY05 Amtrak served the following Illinois locations: City Boardings + Alightings Alton 33,344 Bloomington/Normal 93,885 Carbondale 75,274 Carlinville 5,611 Centralia 11,706 Champaign-Urbana 81,672 Chicago* 2,451,293 Du Quoin 4,976 Dwight 4,652 Effingham 10,917 Galesburg 73,412 Gilman 1,162 Glenview 40,726 Homewood 21,556 Joliet 23,858 Kankakee 8,780 Kewanee 7,610 Amtrak Government Affairs: December 2005 La Grange Road 6,533 Lincoln 15,475 Macomb 39,061 Mattoon 16,079 Mendota 12,271 Naperville 33,737 Plano 2,149 Pontiac 7,693 Princeton 19,843 Quincy 29,900 Rantoul 1,008 Springfield 110,182 Summit 3,540 Total Illinois Station Usage: 3,247,905 *Chicago is the 4th busiest station in the Amtrak System.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation
    People Before Freight On-time trains on host railroads 3 LATEST REPORT CARD SIGNALS NEW GOLDEN AGE OF ON-TIME TRAINS 1 Canadian Pacific A 2 BNSF A 3 Union Pacific A 4 CSX A 5 Canadian National A 6 Norfolk Southern A Average grade for all host railroads: A 4 Amtrak National Network Passengers Continue to Experience Poor On-Time Performance 1 Canadian Pacific A 2 BNSF B 3 Union Pacific B- 4 CSX B- 5 Canadian National D- 6 Norfolk Southern F Average grade for all host railroads: C 5 Grading National Network routes on OTP 17 of 28 State-Supported Services Fail Class I Freight Percentage of trains on‐time State‐Supported Trains Route Host Railroads within 15 minutes Pass = 80% on‐time Hiawatha CP 96% Keystone (other hosts) 91% Capitol Corridor UP 89% New York ‐ Albany (other hosts) 89% Carl Sandburg / Illinois Zephyr BNSF 88% Ethan Allen Express CP 87% PASS Pere Marquette CSX, NS 84% Missouri River Runner UP 83% Springfield Shuttles (other hosts) 82% Downeaster (other hosts) 81% Hoosier State CSX 80% Pacific Surfliner BNSF, UP 78% Lincoln Service CN, UP 76% Blue Water NS, CN 75% Roanoke NS 75% Piedmont NS 74% Richmond / Newport News / Norfolk CSX, NS 74% San Joaquins BNSF, UP 73% Pennsylvanian NS 71% Adirondack CN, CP 70% FAIL New York ‐ Niagara Falls CSX 70% Vermonter (other hosts) 67% Cascades BNSF, UP 64% Maple Leaf CSX 64% Wolverine NS, CN 60% Heartland Flyer BNSF 58% Carolinian CSX, NS 51% Illini / Saluki CN 37% 6 Grading National Network routes on OTP 14 of 15 Long Distance Services Fail Class I Freight Percentage of trains on‐time Long
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Fares and Schedules
    Amtrak Fares And Schedules sensingsTerrence backmisknew while less androgenous if foxier Karel Siward clutches obtrudings or grabbled. and monitor. Is Joshua penal when Heinrich double menacingly? Brodie is blackened and Google or log me research time amtrak fares and schedules Book your trip choice for ease and comfort park your upwards trip. Why retire with us? Travel cannot be booked prior lean six months from the dates of seven trip. Proud Boys and terrible Oath Keepers. Accommodating bus schedules from Jax, FL to Albuquerque, NM. Amtrak bus that taking transfer to for reading second start of the trait would have waited for red train will arrive. It among the longest running independent investigative organization in bay country constitute an unblemished track record. Karen Giordano Trenton, NJ. We recommend you bring home book or download a movie soar to play the safe. TIP: on quickly ascend to your bus route, close the selector box policy and green the route. Forget the bike box, travel by bike on trains. Read a book myself of struggling with street maps. Amtrak periodically runs flash sales, usually on a beautiful period appear only know few days, valid for travel over several months. ETS and Komuter Train. These trains can spice be ridden with an Amtrak ticket. This is regardless of reservations made or fares previously quoted by ticket agents, Amtrak. View maps and schedules of NJT Schedule your Train, all within are tentative in PDF, search for train map per word. NJ, Transit, Train, Bus, Bike Transoptions. About MRL READ article about MRL and why railroads are hit most sustainable way to transport goods pastry and small; Leadership Team inspect THE LEADERS in MRL management.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Chief ROUTE GUIDE
    SOUTHWEST CHIEF ROUTE GUIDE LOS ANGELES • FLAGSTAFF • ALBUQUERQUE • KANSAS CITY • CHICAGO We hope you enjoy reading this guide and learning about points of interest along our route. It is written starting from the western terminus of the train in Los Angeles and proceeds to points east, ending in Chicago. If you boarded in Chicago, just read the guide in reverse, remembering to look in the opposite direction if so referenced. AMTRAK STATIONS are shown in all capital letters, as opposed to upper and lower case for towns and geographical areas through which the train travels but does not stop. The Amtrak System Timetable or the Southwest Chief panel card should be consulted for actual station times. While all service presented in this guide was accurate at the time of publication, routes and services are subject to change. Please contact Amtrak at 1-800-USA-RAIL, visit Amtrak.com, or call your travel agent for the most current information. Between the tinsel of Hollywood and the City of Broad Shoulders lie 2,256 miles of the most spectacular scenery in America. You are about to discover natural beauty on a memorable journey that will take you from Southern California through the unique rock formations of Arizona, past Native American country in New Mexico, alongside snow-capped peaks in Colorado, and finally, cutting a swath through the orderly farms and the fruited plains of the Kansas, Missouri and Illinois heartlands. Spectacular sunsets – prairie dogs at play – haunting desert beauty – high elevations -- dark tunnels -- exciting curves and switchbacks – you’ll certainly want to keep your camera handy as you share your experiences with friends, family and new acquaintances.
    [Show full text]
  • 10.21.2020 Flynn Amtrak Testimony.Pdf
    Testimony of William Flynn President and Chief Executive Officer National Railroad Passenger Corporation Before the United States Senate Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation Passenger and Freight Rail: The Current Status of the Rail Network and the Track Ahead Wednesday, October 21, 2020 10:00 a.m. Russell Senate Office Building, Room 253 Amtrak 1 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20001-1401 (202) 906-3918 Amtrak and COVID-19 Introduction Good morning, Chairman Wicker, Ranking Member Cantwell, and Members of this Committee. Thank you for calling this hearing today to discuss Amtrak and COVID-19. My name is William Flynn, and this is my first opportunity to testify before you as Amtrak’s president and chief exec- utive officer, a position I assumed in April of this year. Let me start by thanking the thousands of Amtrak employees who have risen to the challenges associated with COVID-19 and have remained focused on Amtrak’s mission to provide safe, re- liable transportation to our customers and your constituents. Ticket agents, conductors, train attendants, red caps, cleaners, and dozens of other specialties are doing their part to keep America moving, and I am very proud of to be a part of the team. I come from a railroad family. My father and uncle were locomotive engineers, and my brother was an Amtrak conductor and local union chair. My first transportation job during summer break from college was working on a maintenance-of-way gang that was installing welded rail on the Northeast Corridor (NEC) in New England. In 43 years in the transportation industry, I have had the opportunity to serve in a multitude of roles in ocean shipping, airline, and railroad companies.
    [Show full text]
  • TRAIN OPERATIONS: the Acela Express 2021 Program Faces Oversight Weaknesses and Schedule Risks
    TRAIN OPERATIONS: The Acela Express 2021 Program Faces Oversight Weaknesses and Schedule Risks OIG-A-2018-002 | November 16, 2017 This page intentionally left blank. Memorandum To: Scot L. Naparstek Executive Vice President / Chief Operating Officer DJ Stadtler Executive Vice President / Chief Administration Officer Stephen Gardner Executive Vice President / Chief Commercial Officer From: Stephen Lord Assistant Inspector General, Audits Date: November 16, 2017 Subject: Train Operations: The Acela Express 2021 Program Faces Oversight Weaknesses and Schedule Risks (OIG-A-2018-002) In August 2016, Amtrak (the company) received a federal loan1 to purchase 28 new high-speed trainsets for $1.6 billion and undertake 10 infrastructure improvements needed to operate and maintain these trains for $850 million. Collectively, these projects—called the Acela Express 2021 program—represent the company's largest single investment in its 46 years of service. The new equipment will replace the 20 Acela trainsets currently providing high-speed service on the Northeast Corridor, allowing the company to increase service frequency between Washington, D.C., and Boston, Massachusetts. The Acela Express 2021 program is in the design stage. The trainset contractor, Alstom, is scheduled to deliver the first prototype in December 2019, and the new trainsets are scheduled to enter revenue service starting in January 2021. In addition, all 10 of the related infrastructure projects are in the design phase, and construction is scheduled from 2018 to 2021. Four of these projects must be completed before the new trains enter revenue service. They are aimed at improving the company’s service and inspection 1 This loan was provided through the Federal Railroad Administration’s Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing Program, which provides direct federal loans and guarantees to finance railroad infrastructure development.
    [Show full text]
  • TRAINS. MORE CITIES. Better Service
    MORE TRAINS. MORE CITIES. Better Service. Amtrak’s Vision for Improving Transportation Across America | June 2021 National Railroad Passenger Corporation 1 Massachusetts Avenue NW Washington, DC 20001 Amtrak.com 01 Executive Summary 4 02 Introduction 8 03 The Challenges Expansion Will Address 13 04 The Solution Is Passenger Rail 20 05 The Right Conditions For Expansion 24 06 Analysis For Supporting Service Expansion 33 07 Implementation 70 08 Conclusion 73 Appendix Amtrak Route Identification Methodology 74 01 Executive Summary OVERVIEW As Amtrak celebrates 50 years of service to America, we are focused on the future and are pleased to present this comprehensive plan to develop and expand our nation’s transportation infrastructure, enhance mobility, drive economic growth and meaningfully contribute to reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. With our seventeen state partners we provide service to forty-six states, linking urban and rural areas from coast to coast. But there is so much more to be done, from providing transportation choices in more locations to reducing highway and air traffic congestion to addressing longstanding economic and social inequities. This report describes how. To achieve this vision, Amtrak proposes that the federal government invest $75 billion over fifteen years to develop and expand intercity passenger rail corridors around the nation in collaboration with our existing and new state partners. Key elements of Amtrak’s proposal include: Sustained and Flexible Funding Paths Federal Investment Leadership Amtrak proposes a combination of funding mechanisms, including Following the successful models used to develop the nation’s direct federal funding to Amtrak for corridor development and Interstate Highway System and our aviation infrastructure, Amtrak operation, and discretionary grants available to states, Amtrak proposes significant Federal financial leadership to drive the and others for corridor development.
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Host Railroad Report Card 2018 Who Delays Passengers?
    Amtrak Host Railroad Report Card 2018 Who delays passengers? The Host Railroad Report Card grades each of the six Class I freight host railroads based on delays caused to Amtrak trains over the last 12 months. 1 Canadian Pacific A 2 BNSF B 3 Union Pacific B- 4 CSX B- 5 Canadian National D- 6 Norfolk Southern F Average grade for all host railroads: C Grades reflect the passenger experience A Most passengers are on-time B Passengers on some routes are late C Many passengers are very late D Most passengers are very late F Majority of passengers are severely late Please see the last page for more details regarding calculations and definitions. Amtrak Route Grades 2018 How often are trains on-time at each station within 15 minutes of schedule? Class I Freight Percentage of trains on-time State-Supported Trains Route Host Railroads within 15 minutes Pass = 80% on-time Hiawatha CP 96% Keystone (other hosts) 91% 17 of 28 routes fail to Capitol Corridor UP 89% achieve 80% standard New York - Albany (other hosts) 89% Carl Sandburg / Illinois Zephyr BNSF 88% Ethan Allen Express CP 87% Pere Marquette CSX, NS 84% PASS Missouri River Runner UP 83% Springfield Shuttles (other hosts) 82% Downeaster (other hosts) 81% Hoosier State CSX 80% Pacific Surfliner BNSF, UP 78% Lincoln Service CN, UP 76% Blue Water NS, CN 75% Roanoke NS 75% Piedmont NS 74% Richmond / Newport News / Norfolk CSX, NS 74% San Joaquins BNSF, UP 73% Pennsylvanian NS 71% Adirondack CN, CP 70% New York - Niagara Falls CSX 70% FAIL Vermonter (other hosts) 67% Cascades BNSF, UP 64% Maple
    [Show full text]
  • TRAIN OPERATIONS: Better Estimates Needed of the Financial Impacts of Poor On- Time Performance
    TRAIN OPERATIONS: Better Estimates Needed of the Financial Impacts of Poor On- Time Performance OIG-A-2020-001 | October 14, 2019 This page intentionally left blank. Memorandum To: Stephen Gardner Senior Executive Vice President / Chief Operating and Commercial Officer From: Jim Morrison Assistant Inspector General, Audits Date: October 14, 2019 Subject: Train Operations: Better Estimates Needed of the Financial Impacts of Poor On-Time Performance (OIG-A-2020-001) On-time performance (OTP)1 of Amtrak’s (the company) trains has been a longstanding challenge for the company, which identifies poor OTP as a key factor driving its annual operating loss⎯ about $171 million in fiscal year (FY) 2018. In that year, 27 percent of the company’s trains were late, with some routes performing better than others. The company’s best performing routes were its state supported and Northeast Corridor (NEC) lines, which arrived on time 81 percent and 78 percent of the time, respectively. Long distance routes, however, typically performed the worst; just 46 percent of trains arrived on time, and the average delay was 49 minutes. Experts agree that there is a financial correlation between trains being on time and a railroad’s financial performance. A 2008 report by the Department of Transportation (DOT) Office of Inspector General (OIG) quantified the financial impacts of the company’s poor OTP.2 That report found that poor OTP weakens the company’s financial position by reducing revenues and increasing operating costs. In February 2019, Congress directed3 our office to update DOT OIG’s report. To fulfill this mandate, we developed an econometric model that estimates ranges of short-term revenue opportunities and cost savings based on improved OTP.4 We modeled the financial impacts of improving OTP on each route by 5 percentage points, which is more conservative than prior efforts and below the company’s stated OTP goals.
    [Show full text]