RESEARCH

CHINESE OUTBOUND REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT: NEW WAVES, NEW DESTINATIONS KnightFrank.com.cn KnightFrank.com.hk Chinese Outbound Real Estate Investment: New Waves, New Destinations

INTRODUCTION HAVE THE CHANGES IN THE KEY In 2015, we have seen drastic CHINESE MARKET LED TO A FINDINGS RMB devaluation and stock u Despite domestic market uncertainties, RETREAT IN OUTBOUND CAPITAL? Chinese real estate investment overseas has market turmoil in China, as well Chinese property market Inventory, competition and uncertainty continued to grow strongly in 2015, riding on as considerable debate on the the strong appetite for overseas real estate showing signs of recovery Nationwide housing inventory levels, however, remain high and are increasing from both major and smaller investors. This health of China’s economy. Throughout 2014, the price decline in as over-construction in the past continues to add to the existing stock. The trend is also supported by the growing need the domestic housing market was one of 406.8 million square metres in 2014 rose to 452.5 million square metres in 2015 for diversification from some of the more hotly Inevitably, many in the field are according to official statistics. This has put pressure on the profit margins of many the key drivers of the surge in Chinese contested property markets in China. While more developers, in particular, many small- to mid-cap developers. developers among the country’s top 20 have keen to understand whether outbound real estate investment. In invested overseas in 2015 (increasing from 10 all this will have a fundamental 2015, however, there have been signs of These smaller developers find it difficult to compete with the bigger players, such to 14), there has been only a limited increase in a steady housing market recovery. The as and Wanda, in land auctions, especially in the first-tier cities, and in the number of top 20 insurers investing abroad impact on China’s outbound latest statistics indicate that among 70 securing additional funding for development. They also find it hard to clear their (four in 2014 and six in 2015), even though they investment. cities surveyed, 39 recorded a house accumulated inventory, the majority of which is in lower-tier cities, where local managed to clinch several mega-deals in 2015. price increase. This is in sharp contrast with the picture at the end of 2014, u Global gateway cities continue to attract the bulk Knight Frank’s Chinese Outward Real Estate Investment: After when prices in cities across the country of Chinese overseas real estate investment. The the Initial Waves What’s Next report, published in December FIGURE 1 were declining (see Figure 1). Prices in More Chinese cities saw home prices increase insurance giants, in particular, continue to splash 2014, identified a succession of Chinese investment waves hitting the first-tier cities showed the strongest out on trophy properties. In 2015 investment in global real estate markets. Apart from the heavyweight financial No. of cities the UK is on par with that of 2014, but strong institutions, developers and insurers who formed the first three growth. For example, Beijing’s house growth in Australia continues unabated. There waves of capital outflow, we identified a newFourth “ Wave” - a prices have grown 10.5% year on year in has also been significantly increased investment mixed group of investors consisting of lesser known small- to 2015, and ’s have grown 47%. in US commercial real estate, making it the mid-cap companies and developers, private equity funds and Transaction volume also rebounded. fastest growing mature market. Manhattan has individuals, who were increasingly active in those markets. With This turnaround was largely thanks to absorbed the lion’s share of this capital, with a them joining the fray in the last two years, we have already seen all monetary and financial easing, as well as fivefold increase year on year (YoY), dwarfing these waves beating on the shores of mature markets. the lifting of purchase restrictions by the other primary cities. However, there has been a By shedding light on recent investment deals and activities government. With the Chinese economy flurry of activity by small- to mid-cap investors of Chinese investors, this paper intends to answer two key experiencing the worst slow-down since in projects below US$50 million, especially in questions. First, given the uncertainties in the Chinese market, 2008, the government is eager not to let primary and secondary American cities. going into 2016, will there be a tapering of investment from China? a stagnant real estate market drag down

u De-coupled from the uncertainties of China’s Second, what will bring investors to the market? consumption and the GDP. Source: National Bureau of Statistics, Knight Frank Research domestic economy, Chinese outbound capital is set to grow. This is not just the result of the government’s various capital liberalisation initiatives, such as the Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) schemes, but also, perhaps more importantly, an outcome of China’s long-term national strategy both to project its trade and investment prowess globally and to ensure financial stability.

u When compared with gateway cities, the yield spread in some leading regional centres has continued to improve over 2014, indicating the relative attractiveness of these cities for investors, especially small- to mid-cap ones. However, large investors will continue to favour gateway cities because of the availability of stock, capital value and rental growth. Gateway cities with a strong quality pipeline, relative stability, active occupier activity and sustained income growth will continue to benefit from the growing outflow of Chinese capital.

2 3 KnightFrank.com.cn KnightFrank.com.hk Chinese Outbound Real Estate Investment: New Waves, New Destinations

purchasing power is not as strong it under 10% for developers and less FIGURE 2 as that in the first-tier cities. With than 5% for insurance companies. As , TABLE 2 Chinese outbound global real estate cash flow a major problem, turning to a result, in 2015 we continued to see WHO Outbound investment status of investment volume major Chinese developers and insurance companies overseas markets seems to be a viable many mega-deals taking place around US$ bn option for these developers. the world, with the majority in gateway WHAT & Developers cities (See Table 1). The recent RMB devaluation and stock 2014 Outbound Outbound market turbulence has also contributed A comparison with the same list of Rank Developer Property sales investment investment to market uncertainty, which has led 2014, which featured a similar number WHERE? (US$ billion) status (2014) status (2015) of London deals but only two New York 1 Greenland Group 37.7 u u to investor wariness of further policy More developers enter the intervention. This underscores the need deals, revealed that in 2015 investors 2 Vanke Group 33.7 u u for diversification for Chinese investors, were focusing more on New York, while market, while insurers snap 3 Wanda Group 25.1 u u particularly overseas. London stagnates. Investor interest up trophy assets 4 Poly Real Estate 21.4 u u in Australia, particularly Sydney, has 5 20.6 u u In 2015 there was significantly more Outbound capital not diminished as many had feared, 6 20.2 u u Chinese developers in the country’s continues to flow even after the latest RMB devaluation China Overseas Land & top-20 list investing overseas (increasing 7 17.6 u u and with demand for natural resources Investment Against this background, there were from 10 to 14), reflecting the need this weakening. Australian prices, coupled 8 Greentown China 12.4 u u some predictions of a retrenchment group sees to diversify their investments with strong Chinese buying power and 9 Sunac China 11.2 u u of Chinese outbound investment. Our amidst fierce domestic competition (See continued weakness in the Australian 10 11.0 u u latest statistics, however, point to the dollar, has continued to attract capital Table 2). In contrast, there has been 11 11.0 u u opposite. In the first 10 months of 2015, inflow. only a limited increase in the number of total volume of Chinese outbound real top-20 insurers investing abroad (four in 12 R&F Properties 8.5 u u estate investment has already exceeded It is worth noting that there were several 2014 and six in 2015). Caution is key, as 13 CFLD 8.0 u u that of the entire previous year. By the mega-deals made by Chinese investors there has been hardly any movement in 14 China Merchants Property 8.0 u u end of 2015, the total Chinese outbound in Hong Kong in 2015 that would easily the bottom half of the list, most of whom 15 Longfor Properties 7.7 u u capital has reached nearly US$30 billion make the top 10 list in Table 1, edging are either financially less ambitious about 16 Gemdale Corporation 7.7 u u (See Figure 2), doubling that of 2014. out several deals at the bottom. As we expanding beyond their national borders 17 Agile Properties 6.9 u u discuss later in the report, Hong Kong or have adopted a wait-and-see attitude. 18 Sino Ocean Land 6.3 u u Investors, especially heavyweights with has recently seen renewed interest from Beijing Capital In dollar terms, however, 2015 has 19 3.9 u u ample financial power, seem to be able Chinese investors. Development to decouple from any negative impact proved to be the most productive year 20 Future Holdings 3.8 u u that domestic policies and the economy for Chinese insurers, with more than US$4 billion spent buying overseas might have. The explanation lies in the Insurance companies relatively small proportion of total capital property, compared to about US$2 billion 2014 Premium Outbound Outbound that has been deployed overseas by a year before. One of the most active Source: RCA, Knight Frank Research investors, Anbang Insurance, completed Rank Insurance company income investment investment *Note: Data as at December 2015 these big players. Some estimates put (US$ billion) status (2014) status (2015) the US$1.95 billion Waldorf Astoria hotel 1 China Life Insurance 58.2 u u deal in February, the largest Chinese 2 PICC 51.9 u u overseas investment deal in 2015. It then 3 Ping An Insurance 49.6 u u TABLE 1 spent another US$414 million in May 2015 Top 10 overseas deals completed by Chinese insurers, institutions and developers (excluding Hong Kong) u u buying the Merrill Lynch Financial Center 4 China Pacific Insurance 30.0 5 New China Life Insurance 17.2 u u Property Consideration in Manhattan. Also, Ping An Insurance Date Purchaser Property Name Location Type (US$ million) purchased the Tower Place in Central 6 China Taiping 12.3 u u 7 Taikang Life 10.6 u u Feb Anbang Insurance Waldorf Astoria New York Hotel 1,950 London. 8 Anbang Insurance 9.1 u u Jan China Investment Corp (JV LaSalle Investment) Meguro Gajoen Tokyo Office 1,170 More building deals, 9 Sunshine Insurance 6.1 u u 10 Sino Life 5.7 u u Jul Taiping Life Insurance 111 Murray Street New York Dev Site 820 new directions and asset 11 China Post Life 3.4 u u Greenland Group Tebrau Bay Waterfront City Malaysia Dev Site Jan 683 diversification 12 CCB Life 2.5 u u May Bank of China 7 Bryant Park New York Office 600 Amidst this onslaught, Chinese 13 Union Life 1.8 u u investors are also learning and adapting, 14 ABC Life 1.6 u u Jan Ping An Insurance Tower Place London Office 506 leading to subtle changes of direction 15 Aeon Life 1.3 u u China Life Insurance (JV Qatar Investment Authority) 99 Bishopsgate London Office Oct 420 in their approaches. Some insurance 16 Minsheng Life 1.2 u u companies, for example, are exploring May Anbang Insurance Merrill Lynch Financial Center New York Office 414 17 Happy Life Insurance 1.2 u u development projects. Ping An Insurance 18 Lian Life 0.8 u u Jul Fosun International Ltd Palazzo Broggi Milan Office 384 and China Life JV formed a joint venture 19 Zhongrong Life 0.7 u u with US developer Tishman Speyer Jun Hao Yuan Investment Dundee Road Singapore Dev Site 358 20 Guohua Life 0.6 u u to invest in a mixed-use development u Already made investment offshore u Expressed interest to invest offshore u No public plan to invest offshore Source: RCA project in Boston, and state-owned Taiping Insurance set up an offshore Source: Knight Frank Research, public sources

4 5 KnightFrank.com.cn KnightFrank.com.hk Chinese Outbound Real Estate Investment: New Waves, New Destinations

subsidiary investment fund to invest in overseas real estate. Their first deal, a luxury condo prefer to tap into the expertise of major stake in Greentown China Holdings for project on 111 Murray Street in New York, was expected to cost US$820 million. developers who have already had US$771 million (HK$6.013 billion). FIGURE 5 significant development projects in Chinese real estate investment However in 2015, there was a general preference for buildings over development in gateway cities countries like the US, UK and Australia. Sizable capital flows sites, even by the developers. Development sites took up 36% of the total outbound US$ m investment in 2014, but in 2015, this percentage fell to about 27% (see Figure Second, facing reduced availability of The traditional gateway cities are still 3). As residential development typically makes up more than 40% of total trophy assets and yield compression in the preferred destinations for Chinese development sites, this shrinkage reflects the fact that many developers, while the gateway cities of these countries, investment (see Figure 5). New York has still looking for land for residential units, believe the preparation work and many Chinese insurers were finding it become the top investment destination complexity of local laws and planning rules make acquiring existing prime difficult to deploy capital in 2015. This in 2015 having spent US$5.78 billion buildings more attractive. partly explains why we did not see a in the city, with a fivefold increase YoY. substantial increase in the number of 2014’s top destination, Sydney and Chinese developer Beijing Capital Development Holdings, for example, players in the market in 2015. Melbourne, is in second place in 2015, invested US$98.8 million in Friary Court, an office building in London in attracting a total of US$3.8 billion of December 2015. Dalian Wanda bought two office buildings in Sydney Third, given their often complicated Chinese investment. Interest in London earlier in 2015, with the intention of transforming the site into a mixed-use approval processes, insurance has remained strong, but it fell to third project, costing US$1 billion overall. Greenland Group bought the Mercure companies are not as nimble as their place as the momentum of previous Hotel in Sydney and will convert it to a residential apartment building. developer counterparts, who can move years absorbed many of the most prized quickly to adapt to changing market Among building transactions, office investment remains the favourite for properties available. conditions. Also, many developers have Chinese investors. It is largely unchanged proportionally compared to 2014. already made substantial investments In 2015, Australia continued to Meanwhile hotel deals also ballooned, propelled by a number of mega- overseas, learning valuable lessons see rapid growth in real estate deals in New York (the Waldorf Astoria) and Sydney (the Hilton). Even if we along the way. This makes them ideal investment from China, with Sydney exclude these mega-deals, investment in the hotel sector was still double targets for Chinese insurers. and Melbourne the focus. Chinese that of 2014. developers have been particularly

Chinese firms in other sectors have aggressive, with seven of the top ten also taken a stake in the country’s players active in Australia, along with a Chinese insurers in a buying frenzy developers. For example, China drove of smaller developers. of a different kind Communications Construction, a Source: RCA, Knight Frank Research construction company, bought a 24% The China-Australia Free Trade Note: Data as at December 2015 During the course of 2015, some major Chinese insurance companies invested heavily in the country’s large developers. In December, for example, Anbang Insurance purchased 20.5% MAP 1 Chinese purchases in London – key transactions in 2015 of Sino Ocean Land for US$1 billion. Anbang eventually increased its ownership in Sino Ocean Land to 29.98%. At around the same time, Foresea Life Insurance increased its ownership of leading developer Vanke to 24.26% (see Figure 4). Many of these developers already had substantial overseas property investments. There are three major reasons behind this flurry. OUTBOUND INVESTMENT BY SECTOR FIGURE 3 GLOBAL CHINESE First, insurance firms often lack experience in Source: RCA, Knight Frank Research Note: Data as at December 2015 property development. For this reason they

FIGURE 4 Insurance companies’ investment in shares of developers with overseas reach New Hexie China Life Ping An Anbang Sino Life Foresea Life China Life Health Insurance* Insurance Insurance* Insurance Insurance * Insurance Insurance China Vanke* 7.01% 24.26% Greenland Group* 20.14% Country Garden* 9.91% Sino Ocean Land* 29.99% 29.98% China Jinmao 9.5% Gemdale Corporation* 14.6% 27.63% Financial Street Holdings 13.35% 15.88% Landsea Group* 9.9%

Source: Knight Frank Research, Public sources Note: Foresea Life insurance together with Shenzhen Jushenghua *The firm has also invested in overseas property markets Source: Knight Frank Capital Markets, RCA

6 7 KnightFrank.com.cn KnightFrank.com.hk Chinese Outbound Real Estate Investment: New Waves, New Destinations

Agreement was officially signed in June 2015, raising the investment threshold for Chinese investors having to go to the Foreign Investment Review Board (FIRB) from AUD$248 million to AUD$1.07 billion. Warm bilateral relations and Chinese governmental policy encouragement, such as the Qualified Domestic Individual Investor or QDII schemes, which allow more funds from individuals and institutions to be invested overseas, are expected to provide greater access for Chinese investment in the Australian property market. In the UK, total number of deals is on par with that of 2014, however, the average deal size is smaller. Most transactions were by large institutional investors, focusing on prime office buildings in London. China Life and Ping An Insurance each acquired a London office building during the year. While Sino-British industrial cooperation may favour some regional cities, the relatively small size of these cities means that the volume of quality stock that an international investor would want to buy is limited. Consequently, investors for small to accounting for 52.3% of the total There have still been very significant Despite low yields and high entry cost medium-sized projects may have to look to other investment in the country (Figure 6). In investments in 2015 in a range of the Chinese institutions are keen to mature markets for more choice (see Map 1). terms of sector allocation of building primary and secondary markets, such establish their presence in the city as Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago As for London, our view is that we are at the end of deals, the hotel sector, boosted by be it residential or offices for owner and Boston. In Boston for example, the yield-compression stage of the office cycle. the US$1.95 billion Waldorf Astoria occupation as regional headquarters. China Life and Ping An co-invested Rental growth prospects are strong with the hotel deal, made up 36% of the total Being an international financial centre in Tishman Speyer’s Pier4 Waterfront vacancy rate at a 14-year low. There is robust activity in the country, followed by office with independent judiciary and financial Project. In fact, there have been over demand in the leasing market, especially (22%) and industrial (17%). The drop system, Hong Kong is increasingly used 100 investment acquisitions below from tech firms. Buyer interest is focused in proportion of office deals obscures as the first stop for Chinese outbound US$50 million by Chinese investors on development sites and short income the fact that there is actually a 60% capital. With the development of across the US (see feature: “The ‘Fourth assets, particularly in London’s tech increase of transaction volume in the financial cooperation between China Wave’ investors continue to seek FIGURE 6 villages. Although relatively expensive, sector in 2015 (from US$1 billion in mainland and Hong Kong, such as the opportunities”). The choices available London delivers consistently good, 2014 to US$1.6 billion in 2015). The Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect in these primary and secondary cities demand-driven rental growth, 12-fold increase in industrial transaction programme and of Hong Kong as a CHINESE may prove to be ideal for many small- to making it attractive for investors in was propelled by China Life Insurance’s Renminbi off-shore clearing centre, we mid-cap investors. the coming 12 months. US$1 billion injection into Global expect to see heightened interest from REAL ESTATE Logistics Properties’ portfolio. On the policy front, the Obama north of the border in 2016. In the US, the majority of administration’s latest move to remove the Chinese capital flows It is interesting to see that in large The outbound frenzy has even indirectly INVESTMENT legislative restrictions on foreign pension were into hotel and office transactions above US$250 million, caused renewed interest in key funds investing in US properties and properties in the New York New York still attracts the lion’s share of domestic gateways such as Beijing and REITs will certainly raise interest among ACTIVITY IN THE US IN 2015 borough of Manhattan, Shanghai. On one hand, some major capital inflow. In 2015 Chinese investors Chinese pension institutions, though Source: RCA were the second-largest buyers of asset holders riding on the outbound they do not yet have government wave are offloading some of their assets Manhattan commercial properties, permission to invest abroad. The accounting for more than 20% of total in order to re-deploy capital elsewhere, TABLE 3 potential is vast, given the estimated on the other hand, some local and Major deals completed by Chinese institutions in Hong Kong in 2015 cross-border investment in the city US$540 billion of investable capital foreign investors waiting in the wings borough so far. they currently hold. The legislative Consideration are now ready to take advantage of Date Purchaser Property Name Property Type change does to some extent help to (US$ million) This capital influx can be attributed to the market low and a sudden increase enhance the US market’s attractiveness. Nov Evergrand Group MassMutual Tower Office 1,612.8 heightened activity by Chinese groups, in the available stock. Investment Therefore, we argue that any in contrast to the previous focus on powerhouses such as the Blackstone Sep Shimao Property New Kowloon Inland Lot No. 6542 Dev Site (Residential) 905.8 encouragement on the political front will London. Limited supply in Manhattan Group are actively scouting buying Nov China Life Insurance One HarbourGate (West Wing) Office 755.1 strengthen the US position as the prime also drives faster capital value opportunities amidst slow growth and Sep China Poly Group Tuen Mun Town Lot No. 542 Castle Peak Road Dev Site (Residential) 223.2 investment market for the Chinese. appreciation. High-value Manhattan May CITIC Pacific Sha Tin Town Lot No. 605 Dev Site (Residential) 189.5 market uncertainty. This has created properties are attracting big Chinese Meanwhile closer to home, Hong an active market amidst the country’s Sep Centralcon Group 11 Au Pui Wan Street Dev Site (Mixed) 144.5 buyers who have the interest and ability Kong has seen a new flurry of Chinese economic slowdown. (See feature Dec Chinalco Overseas Holdings Limited Far East Finance Centre Office 48.0 to deploy large sums in a small number investment both in development sites “Shanghai Shines through Mist” on the Source: RCA of transactions. and in office buildings (see Table 3). next page)

8 9 KnightFrank.com.cn KnightFrank.com.hk Chinese Outbound Real Estate Investment: New Waves, New Destinations

Shanghai Shines through Mist Given the increasingly difficult market environment, FDI in property in China has been declining in the past three years. To many China- FIGURE 7 focused funds, however, the importance of this market cannot be Inbound property investment for Shanghai ignored, even with rising uncertainty and dropping yields. This is especially true in the first-tier cities, where there is less risk, higher US$ b liquidity and more stability than in their second-tier counterparts. In the past, however, the high prices and stiff local competition in cities like Shanghai drove away many international investors. In 2015, bucking the trend, investment in Shanghai rebounded strongly, recovering to almost double the level of 2013 (see Figure 7 and Table 4). There is good reason for this change. For many investors in this market, long-term value gain is more important than yield. Therefore, when an economic slow-down drives down the valuation of many quality office buildings, they attract both developers and funds, many of whom struggled to deploy capital in the past year. But why Shanghai? Among the four first-tier cities, Shanghai is perhaps the most open, international and business friendly. It enjoys a good business-government relationship, a relatively transparent operating environment, and perhaps most importantly, a large collection of quality commercial stock that is spread out not in just one CBD, such as Lujiazui, but in several other CBDs, such as Hongqiao, all of which boast good infrastructure and have attracted a cluster of local and foreign corporations who have or are planning to set up HQs for their China operations. Just as with gateway cities such as London, Sydney and New York, a sufficient supply of quality office buildings and a stable policy The “FOURTH WAVE” investors continue to seek opportunities environment will bring Shanghai to the forefront in attracting inbound investment in China. Source: RCA Note: Excluding development site deals In 2015 we continued to see the developer, teamed up with Miami- recently formed a partnership with so-called “Fourth Wave” of Chinese based homebuilder Lennar to develop a Geolo Capital, a private equity firm investors (a new, mixed group following condominium tower in New York. controlled by Hyatt heir John Pritzker, TABLE 4 the first three waves of Chinese to invest up to US$1 billion in hotels. , a developer Top 10 Shanghai inbound investment deals in 2015 institutional investors, developers focusing on China’s Tier II cities, Macrolink Group, an international and insurers) venture offshore. Consideration acquired two residential projects in Date Investor Property Name Property Type trader engaged mining, chemicals, and (US$ million) Private UHNWI players, developers Brooklyn, New York. financial investment, formed a joint and industrialists in this wave have Aug The Link REIT Corporate Ave 1 & 2 Office 1,031 Shanghai Yudu Group, a company been making quite a stir in a quest venture with the Black Stone Resort engaged in construction and property Dec Lee Kum Kee JV China Vanke Corporate Avenue 3 Office 891 for overseas properties. Unlike in South Korea to build hotel and development, acquired the Marriott earlier investments made by Chinese retail complexes on Cheju Island. The Sep ARA Asset Management Group Platinum Tower Office 448 LAX Airport Hotel in Los Angeles for institutions that focused on trophy group has also acquired several plots US$156 million. Aug Yuexiu REIT Hongjia Tower Office 423 assets, these new investors dominate in the Iskandar Development Region small- to mid-cap investment in both Grand China Fund, which specialises in Malaysia, where it plans to develop Dec ARA Asset Management Group BEA Finance Tower Office 422 in investing in residential developments tourism-related projects. primary and secondary locations in Aug Blackstone L'Avenue Office 403 in major Chinese cities, teamed up mature markets, especially in the US. Nanshan Group, a private-owned with local partners Gaia RE Holdings Aug PAG JV Goldman Sachs Ciro's Plaza Office 330 For example: Chinese conglomerate, acquired the and Menora Mivtachim to invest in Jun Mapletree Commercial Trust Sandhill Plaza Office 303 Kuafu Properties, a New-York based residential projects in several US cities. Pullman hotel at Sydney Airport for developer backed by a Chinese private US$61 million. Shanghai Intl Shipping Jan AVIC Joy Holdings (HK) Ltd Office 252 fund, acquired four US properties Wanxiang Group, an auto parts Service Center (Bldg 17) manufacturer, has invested in more Yuhu Group, an investment company within one year of entering the market, than 60 US properties since 2010, focusing in real estate, acquired an Oct Carlyle Group Manpo International Plaza Office 233 spending over US$500 million. including office, retail, industrial, hotel office building in North Sydney with a Source: RCA Note: Excluding development site deals. Preliminary data as at December 2015. Landsea Group, a small specialised and development sites. The company consideration of US$46 million.

10 11 KnightFrank.com.cn KnightFrank.com.hk Chinese Outbound Real Estate Investment: New Waves, New Destinations

was also significant in 2015 although it mainly attributed to the US$1.2 billion How Should the Market Read Meguro Gajoen mega-deal by China WHAT WILL Investment Corporation (CIC). There is into Government Incentives also a growing interest in countries such as India. Against the Backdrop of BRING Outside of the mature markets, Chinese China’s Long-Term investment is primarily focused on development sites instead of completed assets, given the lack of high quality Outbound Investment INVESTORS commercial stock in these locations. As a result, the investors are usually Strategy? developers looking for diversification The past five years has seen the Chinese government delivering a slew from the highly competitive domestic of directives and policies aimed at channelling domestic investment TO THE property market. abroad. From the easing of overseas investment restrictions for large corporations such as insurance companies, to programmes Occupier markets and the encouraging individual outbound investors such as the QDII availability of future supply programmes, all these are part of the government’s long term MARKET? strategy to project financial power as well as to secure a We argue that yield spread is not the only more steady income source for the country (see feature: Are regional centres and second-tier factor considered by Chinese investors. “The 13th Five Year Plan and Outbound Investment”). One of the reasons investment grew We agree that drilling into the clauses and text would faster in New York than in London in cities still attractive? no doubt help understand the details of Chinese 2015 is likely that New York has a much In 2015 a few regional centres and major second-tier cities continue to offer higher government policies. Nevertheless it is important for greater volume of quality stock available. yield spread than the gateway cities (see Figure 8). Does this make them attractive market players outside China to know that these policies, Another reason is that the past buying investment destinations for the next wave of Chinese investment? We presented this bewildering as they are, are part of the grander schemes frenzy in London has strained the supply hypothesis in 2014 when yield compression in gateway cities like London supported such as the “Belt and Road” initiative and the Asian pipeline. the emergence of opportunities in a few regional centres and second-tier cities. Infrastructure Investment Bank which China championed. Over the next four years, however, Operating in a planned economy, Chinese firms bigger or The geographical distribution of Chinese investment in the US may provide some we see a significant supply of office small all have a certain element of government support indication of where most investors are likely to focus their attention. Large institutional space coming on line in the London behind them. Therefore their outward expansion should investors, like sovereign funds, banks, developers and insurance companies, tend market. This should alleviate the current be regarded as much a reflection on the nation’s call as favour big-ticket projects, which only major gateway cities can provide. Gateway cities lack of quality office space available a result of their business strategies. With this in mind the are also where quality tenants and buyers with sufficient financial means can be found. market should have confidence in the sustainability of for investment in the city. And in New The “Fourth Wave” investors, in contrast, are after quality stock available in other Chinese outbound capital. York, Sydney and Melbourne, some primary and secondary locations, especially in the US and Australia. two million sq ft of office space will be Meanwhile Chinese investors are also active in many locations away from the added in each of the next four years, traditional gateway cities. For example, the Greenland Group partnered with a local creating a depth of market unseen in th developer to acquire a development site in Malaysia for US$682.6 million in January the past (Figure 9). However since this The 13 Five Year Plan and 2015. This was already Greenland’s second investment in the country, following its substantial pipeline is still relatively small Outbound Investment US$180 million site deal in Johor Bahru in April 2014. Chinese investment in Japan in proportion to the respective total stock of these cities, it can be easily absorbed At the time of this paper’s release, the Chinese by future demand. government is on the verge of rolling out its 13th FIGURE 8 Five Year Plan (FYP), an economic roadmap for the Prime office yield spread We argue that capital flow from China, five years from 2016 to 2020. Prior to its release, coupled with improving trade relations Knight Frank invited a small group of industry and economic activity, also results experts for a discussion on the likely impact of any in occupier demand from Chinese changes in foreign-investment policies. financial services, banking and industrial On the outbound trend, the participants generally institutions, which prefer Grade-A office hoped that the relevant clauses in the 13th FYP space. Total occupancy of Chinese would include specific measures to streamline and firms in New York has risen 70% YoY facilitate outbound investment, including improved to 853,000 sq ft, following a trend that financing facilities and enhanced fund-channelling is already well established in financial programs, such as the QDII scheme. hubs like Hong Kong, London and The experts agreed that the significance of Sydney. This bodes well for rental growth these policies depended on follow-up laws and and value appreciation of prime office regulations that are fully clarified and enforced. Source: Knight Frank Research, Trading Economics buildings. Source: Knight Frank Research, NGKF

12 13 KnightFrank.com.cn KnightFrank.com.hk Chinese Outbound Real Estate Investment: New Waves, New Destinations

CONCLUSION Now we can return to the two questions asked at the beginning: Will there be a tapering of Chinese investment? And what market factors attract investors in the short- to mid-term? The answer to the first question is “unlikely”. The growth of Chinese outbound investment in 2015 was strong despite the ups and downs of the domestic economy, in contrast to some predictions. Even with country’s efforts to boost domestic consumption, especially in the housing market, we are not seeing a drastic retreat but dramatic increase of Chinese capital globally. In fact, policy-induced market uncertainties continue to plague market sentiment in China, accentuating the need for investment diversification. As for the second question, the answer, as argued previously may lie in the availability of quality stock. However, it is equally important that gateway countries capitalise on the bilateral relationship improvements. For Australia, some positive macro- economic developments come at the right time, when Sino- Australian relations are at their warmest in history. A relatively cheaper Australian dollar and ample investment opportunities will ensure the continuation of current property investment growth. The recent visit by President Xi Jinping to the UK and the trade deals that followed are likely to confirm the UK’s prominent position in China’s future investment map. This will help sustain commercial and financial interest in both investment and occupier markets in London. In the US, despite this being a presidential election year, and with ongoing political and trade friction, the sheer size of the US market and volume potential will be a major draw to Chinese investors going forward. While the larger deals still favour New York, the latest data indicates that major regional cities will provide opportunities for many small- to mid-cap investors. Going forward, as Chinese capital outflow increases with policy support, as well as China’s trade and financial initiatives, capital outflow will become increasingly sustainable. This means ample opportunities for gateway markets, as well as key regional hubs.

14 15 CAPITAL MARKETS

Paul Hart Executive Director, Greater China +852 2846 9537 [email protected]

Tommy Zhang Associate Director, Beijing +86 10 6113 8039 [email protected]

RESEARCH & CONSULTANCY

David Ji Director, Head of Research & Consultancy, Greater China +852 2846 9552 [email protected]

Regina Yang Director, Head of Research & Consultancy, Shanghai +86 21 6302 1728 [email protected]

Vincent Li Assistant Manager, Research & Consultancy, Beijing +86 10 6113 8017 Knight Frank Research provides strategic advice, consultancy services and forecasting to a wide [email protected] range of clients worldwide, including developers and investors, as well as financial and corporate institutions. All recognise the need for the provision of expert independent advice, customised to Ocean Ruan their specific needs. Manager, Research & Valuation, +86 20 3839 6408 [email protected]

RECENT MARKET-LEADING RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS Sam Lau Senior Analyst, Research & Consultancy, Greater China +852 2846 4876 [email protected]

Global Cities Chinese Outbound Greater China Prime Cities Forecast The 2015 Report Report 2014 Quarterly Q4 2015 Report 2016

Knight Frank Research Reports are available at KnightFrank.com/Research

© Knight Frank 2016 Knight Frank Petty Limited. This document and the material contained in it is general information only and is subject to change without notice. All images are for illustration only. No representations or warranties of any nature whatsoever are given, intended or implied. Knight Frank will not be liable for negligence, or for any direct or indirect consequential losses or damages arising from the use of this information. You should satisfy yourself about the completeness or accuracy of any information or materials. This document and the material contained in it is the property of Knight Frank and is given to you on the understanding that such mate- rial and the ideas, concepts and proposals expressed in it are the intellectual property of Knight Frank and protected by copyright. It is understood that you may not use this material or any part of it for any reason other than the evaluation of the document unless we have entered into a further agreement for its use. This document is provided to you in confidence on the understanding it is not disclosed to anyone other than to your employees who need to evaluate it.