DOCSLIB.ORG

2003 Colorado Consolidated Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2003 Colorado Consolidated Report Biological Control of Noxious Weeds on Federal Installations in Colorado Air Force Academy Buckley Airbase Ft. Carson Military Post Monument Fire Center Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site By G. J. Michels, Jr., D. A. Owings, Mustafa Mirik Johnny Bible, Lana Castleberry, Shana Camarata Sarah Bruno, Ryan Bouton, Bob Villarreal, Elise McCown Texas Agricultural Experiment Station 2301 Experiment Station Road Bushland, Texas 79012 Consolidated 2003 Progress Report Cover Photo: A young hawk at Buckley Airbase sits surrounded by field bindweed. A Photoshop-enhanced digital photograph. G. J. Michels, Jr. 2 Table of Contents Introduction................................................................................................................................... 6 General Notes for All Sites........................................................................................................... 7 Air Force Academy....................................................................................................................... 9 Ice Lake Road I Canada thistle perimeters ........................................................................... 15 Ice Lake Road I Canada thistle density 2003....................................................................... 16 Ice Lake Road I Canada thistle height 2003. ........................................................................ 17 Ice Lake Road I Canada thistle seedheads per plant............................................................. 18 Ice Lake Road II Canada thistle perimeters.......................................................................... 19 Ice Lake II Canada thistle density 2003................................................................................ 20 Ice Lake Road II Canada thistle height 2003....................................................................... 21 Monument Creek spotted knapweed perimeters................................................................... 22 Monument Creek spotted knapweed density and height. ..................................................... 23 Monument Creek spotted knapweed seedheads/plant. ......................................................... 24 FERL leafy spurge perimeters. ............................................................................................. 25 FERL leafy spurge density 2003........................................................................................... 26 FERL leafy spurge height 2003. ........................................................................................... 27 Douglas School leafy spurge perimeters............................................................................... 28 Douglas School leafy spurge density 2003........................................................................... 29 Douglas School leafy spurge height 2003. ........................................................................... 30 Deadman’s Trail leafy spurge perimeters............................................................................. 31 Deadman’s Trail leafy spurge density 2003. ........................................................................ 32 Deadman’s Trail leafy spurge height 2003........................................................................... 33 Ice Lake Road I musk thistle area and percentage change. .................................................. 34 Releases and New Sites Established in 2003........................................................................ 35 Highway 83 diffuse knapweed perimeter 2003. ................................................................... 37 Highway 83 diffuse knapweed density 2003........................................................................ 37 Highway 83 diffuse knapweed height 2003.......................................................................... 37 Kettle Lake Canada thistle perimeter 2003........................................................................... 38 Kettle Lake Canada thistle density 2003. ............................................................................. 38 Kettle Lake Canada thistle height 2003................................................................................ 38 Monument Trail Road spotted knapweed perimeter 2003.................................................... 39 Monument Trail Road spotted knapweed density 2003. ...................................................... 39 Monument Trail Road spotted knapweed height 2003......................................................... 39 NPWR spotted knapweed perimeter 2003............................................................................ 40 NPWR spotted knapweed density 2003................................................................................ 40 NPWR spotted knapweed height 2003. ................................................................................ 40 Parade Loop Canada thistle perimeter 2003. ........................................................................ 41 Parade Loop Canada thistle density 2003............................................................................. 41 Parade Loop Canada thistle height 2003. ............................................................................. 41 Water Treatment Plant spotted knapweed perimeter 2003................................................... 42 Water Treatment Plant spotted knapweed density 2003....................................................... 42 Water Treatment Plant spotted knapweed height 2003. ....................................................... 42 Water Treatment Plant diffuse knapweed perimeter 2004. .................................................. 43 Water Treatment Plant diffuse knapweed density 2003. ...................................................... 43 3 Water Treatment Plant diffuse knapweed height 2003......................................................... 43 Community Center Drive Site 1 yellow toadflax perimeter 2003. ....................................... 44 Community Center Drive Site 1 yellow toadflax density 2003............................................ 44 Community Center Drive Site 1 yellow toadflax height 2003. ............................................ 44 Community Center Drive Site 2 yellow toadflax perimeter 2003. ....................................... 45 Community Center Drive Site 2 yellow toadflax density 2003............................................ 45 Community Center Drive Site 2 yellow toadflax height 2003. ............................................ 45 Community Center Drive Combined Sites 1 and 2 yellow toadflax perimeters 2003.......... 46 Buckley Airbase .......................................................................................................................... 47 Buckley Airbase leafy spurge perimeter 2003...................................................................... 51 Buckley Airbase leafy spurge height 2003. .......................................................................... 51 Williams Lake leafy spurge perimeter 2003......................................................................... 52 Williams Lake leafy spurge density 2003............................................................................. 52 Williams Lake leafy spurge height 2003. ............................................................................. 52 Williams Lake Dam Canada thistle perimeter 2003............................................................. 53 Williams Lake Dam Canada thistle density 2003................................................................. 53 Williams Lake Dam Canada thistle height 2003. ................................................................. 53 Aspen Southeast Dalmatian toadflax perimeter 2003........................................................... 54 Aspen Southwest Dalmatian toadflax density 2003. ............................................................ 54 Aspen Southwest Dalmatian toadflax height 2003............................................................... 54 Williams Lake Southwest Canada thistle perimeter 2003. ................................................... 55 Williams Lake Southwest Canada thistle density 2003........................................................ 55 Williams Lake Southwest Canada thistle height 2003. ........................................................ 55 Ft. Carson Military Post............................................................................................................. 56 ARA Canada thistle infestation perimeters........................................................................... 66 ARA Canada thistle density 2003......................................................................................... 67 ARA Canada thistle height 2003 .......................................................................................... 68 ARA Canada thistle seedheads per plant.............................................................................. 69 Highway 115 Canada and Musk thistle perimeters. ............................................................. 70 Highway 115 Musk thistle parameters. ................................................................................ 71 Highway 115 Canada thistle density 2003............................................................................ 72 Highway 115 Canada thistle height 2003. ............................................................................ 73 Duck Pond Canada thistle perimeters..................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Milk Thistle
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control BIOLOGY AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF EXOTIC T RU E T HISTL E S RACHEL WINSTON , RICH HANSEN , MA R K SCH W A R ZLÄNDE R , ER IC COO M BS , CA R OL BELL RANDALL , AND RODNEY LY M FHTET-2007-05 U.S. Department Forest September 2008 of Agriculture Service FHTET he Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) was created in 1995 Tby the Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry, USDA, Forest Service, to develop and deliver technologies to protect and improve the health of American forests. This book was published by FHTET as part of the technology transfer series. http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/technology/ On the cover: Italian thistle. Photo: ©Saint Mary’s College of California. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for information only and does not constitute an endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume: 1 Issue: 2 Year: 2019
    Volume: 1 Issue: 2 Year: 2019 Designed by Müjdat TÖS Acarological Studies Vol 1 (2) CONTENTS Editorial Acarological Studies: A new forum for the publication of acarological works ................................................................... 51-52 Salih DOĞAN Review An overview of the XV International Congress of Acarology (XV ICA 2018) ........................................................................ 53-58 Sebahat K. OZMAN-SULLIVAN, Gregory T. SULLIVAN Articles Alternative control agents of the dried fruit mite, Carpoglyphus lactis (L.) (Acari: Carpoglyphidae) on dried apricots ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 59-64 Vefa TURGU, Nabi Alper KUMRAL A species being worthy of its name: Intraspecific variations on the gnathosomal characters in topotypic heter- omorphic males of Cheylostigmaeus variatus (Acari: Stigmaeidae) ........................................................................................ 65-70 Salih DOĞAN, Sibel DOĞAN, Qing-Hai FAN Seasonal distribution and damage potential of Raoiella indica (Hirst) (Acari: Tenuipalpidae) on areca palms of Kerala, India ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 71-83 Prabheena PRABHAKARAN, Ramani NERAVATHU Feeding impact of Cisaberoptus
    [Show full text]
  • Acari Scientific Classification Kingdom
    Acari - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acari From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Acari (or Acarina) are a taxon of arachnids that contains mites and ticks. The diversity of the Acari is extraordinary and its fossil history Acari goes back to at least the early Devonian period.[1] As a result, Temporal range: acarologists (the people who study mites and ticks) have proposed a Early Devonian–Recent complex set of taxonomic ranks to classify mites. In most modern treatments, the Acari is considered a subclass of Arachnida and is PreЄ Є O S D C P T J K Pg N composed of two or three superorders or orders: Acariformes (or Actinotrichida), Parasitiformes (or Anactinotrichida), and Opilioacariformes; the latter is often considered a subgroup within the Parasitiformes. The monophyly of the Acari is open to debate, and the relationships of the acarines to other arachnids is not at all clear.[2] In older treatments, the subgroups of the Acarina were placed at order rank, but as their own subdivisions have become better-understood, it is more usual to treat them at superorder rank. Most acarines are minute to small (e.g., 0.08–1.00 millimetre or 0.003–0.039 inches), but the largest Acari (some ticks and red velvet mites) may reach lengths of 10–20 millimetres (0.4–0.8 in). Over 50,000 species have been described (as of 1999) and it is estimated that a million or more species may exist. The study of mites and ticks is called acarology (from Greek ἀκαρί/ἄκαρι, akari, a type of mite; and -λογία, -logia),[3] and the leading scientific journals for acarology include Acarologia, Experimental and Applied Acarology and the Peacock mite (Tuckerella sp.), International Journal of Acarology.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Book
    1 The Program Encapsulated SUNDAY Afternoon Registration 1:00-5:00 Lancaster Lobby Local Arrangements 12:00-6:00 New Governor Executive Committee Meeting 1:00-5:00 Harrisburger It’s a Bug’s World – Outreach 1:00-5:00 Whitaker Center Posters and Displays 1:00-5:00 Carlisle Student Oral Presentation Competition 2:00-5:20 York Evening Reception and President’s Welcome 6:00-7:30 Carlisle IDEP Workshop 7:30-9:00 Bridgeport Student Networking 7:30-9:00 Penn Harris Strategic Planning Meeting 7:30-9:00 Leland MONDAY Morning Registration 8:00-5:00 Lancaster Lobby Local Arrangements Until 9:00 pm New Governor Posters and Displays 8:00-5:00 Carlisle Tree Fruit Symposium 8:00-12:00 Lancaster IDEP Symposium 8:00-12:00 Penn Harris NE Regional Field Crops Conference 8:00-12:00 York Outreach Symposium 8:00-12:00 Gettysburg Afternoon Small Fruit Symposium 1:00-5:00 Lancaster Industry Symposium 1:00-5:00 York Student Symposium 1:00-4:35 Penn Harris Biological Control Symposium 1:00-5:00 Gettysburg Corn Earworm Resistance Discussion 2:00-5:00 Lochiel Boardroom Evening Social and cash bar 5:30-6:00 Carlisle Banquet and awards 6:00-8:30 York/Lebanon Linnaean Games 9:00 Lancaster TUESDAY Morning Registration 8:00-10:00 Lancaster Lobby Local Arrangements 8:00-12:00 New Governor Eastern Branch Business Meeting 7:00-7:45 Lebanon Posters and Displays 8:00-12:00 Carlisle Acarology Symposium 8:00-10:50 York Forestry Symposium 8:00-12:00 Lancaster Disease Vector Symposium 8:00-11:45 Gettysburg Submitted Papers 8:30-11:45 Lebanon Adjourn 12:00 2 Harrisburg Hilton Floor Plan Second Floor Third Floor 3 2005 SPONSORS BASF CORPORATION BAYER CROPSCIENCE CEREXAGRI, INC DOW AGROSCIENCES DuPONT AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS ELSEVIER/ACCADEMIC PRESS ENTOVISION FMC CORPORATION HERCON ENVIRONMENTAL LABSERVICES MANA MONSANTO NICHINO AMERICA, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Template
    Impacts of aboveground and belowground interactions on the performance of an invasive thistle, Cirsium arvense by Krystal Anne Maria Nunes A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto © Copyright by Krystal A Nunes 2018 Impacts of aboveground and belowground interactions on the performance of an invasive thistle, Cirsium arvense Krystal Anne Maria Nunes Doctor of Philosophy Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto 2018 Abstract Interactions with natural enemies are important to the success of invasive plants in their invaded range. However, little is known of the relative impacts of above- and belowground interactions, or how these interactions may change across the invaded range or between growing seasons. My research investigated these questions using Asteraceae occurring in Ontario, Canada. First, I quantified aboveground herbivory for exotic and native Asteraceae across a latitudinal gradient with the expectation that marginal or more northern populations would experience reduced enemy pressure. Herbivory did not always decline with increasing latitude, but often depended upon the causal herbivorous organism(s) or whether the species was native or exotic. I then further investigated a single non-native species exhibiting strong latitudinal trends in herbivory, Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). I manipulated distance between plots of C. arvense to see if local spatial and/or temporal isolation also allowed escape from aboveground enemy pressure. Herbivory patterns changed significantly over 4 years, with initial patterns of reduced damage with isolation disappearing by the final year. However, variation in aboveground damage did not explain performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Final Report Project Towards more profitable and sustainable vegetable farming systems in north-western Vietnam project number AGB/2012/059 date published 30 June 2019 (updated 26 October 2020) prepared by Wendy Umberger, Dale Yi and Nikki Dumbrell co-authors Paul Milham, Phan Thuy Hien, Pham Thi Mai Huong, Dindo Campilan, Rosalie Daniel, Chu Thi My, Len Tesoriero, Nguyen Hoang Viet, Steven Underhill, Tran Thanh Nhan, Nguyen Huu Nhuan, Nguyen Anh Duc, Tran Minh Tien, Stephen Harper, Nguyen Thi Tan Loc, Ngo Thu Hang, Ha Thi Tra My, Nguyen Hien, Oleg Nicetic, Christian Genova approved by Howard Hall final report number FR2019-92 ISBN 978-1-925747-68-3 ACIAR published by GPO Box 1571 Canberra ACT 2601Australia This publication is published by ACIAR ABN 34 864 955 427. Care is taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication. However, ACIAR cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the information or opinions contained in the publication. You should make your own enquiries before making decisions concerning your interests. © Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) 2018 - This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from ACIAR, GPO Box 1571, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia, [email protected]. Final report: Towards more profitable and sustainable vegetable farming systems in north-western Vietnam Contents 1 Acknowledgments.........................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Species and Climate Change: an Agronomic Perspective
    Invasive species and climate change: an agronomic perspective Climatic Change An Interdisciplinary, International Journal Devoted to the Description, Causes and Implications of Climatic Change ISSN 0165-0009 Volume 105 Combined 1-2 Climatic Change (2010) 105:13-42 DOI 10.1007/ s10584-010-9879-5 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by U.S. Government. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self-archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self- archive your work, please use the accepted author’s version for posting to your own website or your institution’s repository. You may further deposit the accepted author’s version on a funder’s repository at a funder’s request, provided it is not made publicly available until 12 months after publication. 1 23 Author's personal copy Climatic Change (2011) 105:13–42 DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9879-5 Invasive species and climate change: an agronomic perspective Lewis H. Ziska · Dana M. Blumenthal · G. Brett Runion · E. Raymond Hunt Jr · Hilda Diaz-Soltero Received: 6 January 2009 / Accepted: 25 March 2010 / Published online: 19 August 2010 © U.S. Government 2010 Abstract In the current review we wish to draw attention to an additional aspect of invasive species and climate change, that of agricultural productivity and food security. We recognize that at present, such a review remains, in part, speculative, and more illustrative than definitive. However, recent events on the global stage, particularly in regard to the number of food riots that occurred during 2008, even at a time of record harvests, have prompted additional interest in those factors, including invasive species, which could, through climatic uncertainty, alter food production.
    [Show full text]
  • Effectiveness of Eriophyid Mites for Biological Control of Weedy Plants and Challenges for Future Research
    Exp Appl Acarol (2010) 51:115–149 DOI 10.1007/s10493-009-9299-2 Effectiveness of eriophyid mites for biological control of weedy plants and challenges for future research L. Smith Æ E. de Lillo Æ J. W. Amrine Jr. Received: 31 March 2009 / Accepted: 3 August 2009 / Published online: 16 September 2009 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Eriophyid mites have been considered to have a high potential for use as classical biological control agents of weeds. We reviewed known examples of the use of eriophyid mites to control weedy plants to learn how effective they have been. In the past 13 years, since Rosenthal’s 1996 review, 13 species have undergone some degree of pre- release evaluation (Aceria genistae, A. lantanae, Aceria sp. [boneseed leaf buckle mite (BLBM)], A. salsolae, A. sobhiani, A. solstitialis, A. tamaricis, A. thalgi, A. thessalonicae, Cecidophyes rouhollahi, Floracarus perrepae, Leipothrix dipsacivagus and L. knautiae), but only four (A. genistae, Aceria sp. [BLBM], C. rouhollahi and F. perrepae) have been authorized for introduction. Prior to this, three species (Aceria chondrillae, A. malherbae and Aculus hyperici) were introduced and have become established. Although these three species impact the fitness of their host plant, it is not clear how much they have contributed to reduction of the population of the target weed. In some cases, natural enemies, resistant plant genotypes, and adverse abiotic conditions have reduced the ability of eriophyid mites to control target weed populations. Some eriophyid mites that are highly coevolved with their host plant may be poor prospects for biological control because of host plant resis- tance or tolerance of the plant to the mite.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide for the Biological Control of Weeds in Eastern North America
    US Department TECHNOLOGY of Agriculture TRANSFER FIELD GUIDE FOR THE BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF WEEDS IN EASTERN NORTH AMERICA Rachel L. Winston, Carol B. Randall, Bernd Blossey, Philip W. Tipping, Ellen C. Lake, and Judy Hough-Goldstein Forest Health Technology FHTET-2016-04 Enterprise Team April 2017 The Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) was created in 1995 by the Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry, USDA, Forest Service, to develop and deliver technologies to protect and improve the health of American forests. This book was published by FHTET as part of the technology transfer series. http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/technology/ Cover photos: Purple loosestrife (Jennifer Andreas, Washington State University Extension), Galerucella calmariensis (David Cappaert, Michigan State University, bugwood.org), tropical soda apple ((J. Jeffrey Mullahey, University of Florida, bugwood.org), Gratiana boliviana (Rodrigo Diaz, Louisiana State University), waterhyacinth (Chris Evans, University of Illinois, bugwood.org), Megamelus scutellaris (Jason D. Stanley, USDA ARS, bugwood.org), mile-a-minute weed (Leslie J. Mehrhoff, University of Connecticut, bugwood.org), Rhinoncomimus latipes (Amy Diercks, bugwood.org) How to cite this publication: Winston, R.L., C.B. Randall, B. Blossey, P.W. Tipping, E.C. Lake, and J. Hough-Goldstein. 2017. Field Guide for the Biological Control of Weeds in Eastern North America. USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West Virginia. FHTET-2016-04. In accordance with
    [Show full text]
  • Version A.Indd
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Continental Divide Research Learning Center Rocky Mountain National Park Research Conference 2008 Welcome to Rocky Mountain National Park’s Biennial Research Conference. You will see from this abstract booklet, and from the presentations, the amazing breadth and depth of the park’s research program. In 2007 alone we had more than 70 studies. This conference honors the contributions of project investigators who through their work are building a foundation of knowledge for good decision making. Judy Visty Research Administrator Rocky Mountain National Park More information about the park and the research program may be found at www.nps.gov/romo The observations and opinions expressed in these research presentations are those of the respective researchers and presenters and should not be interpreted as representing the offi cial views of Rocky Mountain National Park or the National Park Service. National2008 Park Research Service U.S. De Conferencepartment of the Interior Rocky Mountain National Park Estes Park Municipal Building, Town Board Room ● 170 MacGregor Ave, Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Monday, April 7 Climate Change 1:00-1:30 Ben Bobowski Welcome and Climate Change Initiatives in Rocky Mountain National Park 1:30-2:00 Klaus Wolter, NOAA The Changing Climate 2:00-2:15 Break 2:15-2:45 Judy Visty Park Ecosystem Response to Climate Change 2:45-3:15 Jill Baron Climate-Induced Changes in Nitrogen Dynamics in Loch Vale Watershed, Rocky Mountain National Park 3:15-4:00 Juraj Švajda Tree
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 60.Qxp Layout 1 14/12/19 10:41 Pagina 1 Volume 60.Qxp Layout 1 14/12/19 10:41 Pagina 2
    copertina 60.qxp_Layout 2 03/12/19 17:31 Pagina 1 2% 3% 4% 5% S/D C+M K C M Y BAL 80% 40% 0 K C M Y BAL S/D C+Y K C K C M Y BAL S/D M+Y K C M Y BAL 80% 40% 0 K C M Y BAL S/D K K C M Y BAL 80% 40% 0 K C M Y BAL S/D C+M K C M Y BAL 80% 40% 0 K C M Y BAL S/D C+Y K C K C M Y BAL S/D M+Y K C 60 ATTI DEL MUSEO CIVICO DI STORIA NATURALE DI TRIESTE ATTI DEL MUSEO CIVICO DI STORIA NATURALE DI TRIESTE DI NATURALE MUSEO CIVICO DI STORIA DEL ATTI ISSN: 0335-1576 2019 TRIESTE 2019 VOL. 60 - 2019 COPIA OMAGGIO volume 60.qxp_Layout 1 14/12/19 10:41 Pagina 1 volume 60.qxp_Layout 1 14/12/19 10:41 Pagina 2 ATTI DEL MUSEO CIVICO DI STORIA NATURALE DI TRIESTE Vol. 60 - 2019 ISSN: 0335-1576 DIRIGENTE DIRETTORE RESPONSABILE DEL PERIODICO Laura Carlini Fanfogna COMITATO SCIENTIFICO Nicola BRESSI, zoologia Deborah ARBULLA, paleontologia Andrea COLLA, entomologia Enrico BENUSSI, zoologia Pier Luigi NIMIS, botanica Paolo GRUNANGER, botanica Franco FRILLI, botanica Giorgio CARNEVALE paleontologia Guido PAGLIANO entomologia Franco CUCCHI, paleontologia Louis TAVERNE paleontologia John G. MAISEY paleontologia REDAZIONE Livio Fogar Museo Civico di Storia Naturale via Tominz, 4 - 34139 Trieste - Italia Tel. : +390406758227/662 - Fax +390406758230 E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] www.retecivica.trieste.it/triestecultura/musei In copertina: Magnanina comune Sylvia undata (foto di Claudio Bearzatto) On the cover: Magnanina comune Sylvia undata (photo of Claudio Bearzatto) Finito di stampare nel mese di dicembre 2019 da Grafica Goriziana sas, Gorizia volume 60.qxp_Layout 1 14/12/19 10:41 Pagina 3 ISSN: 0335-1576 ATTI DEL MUSEO CIVICO DI STORIA NATURALE DI TRIESTE VOL.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records for Aceria Anthocoptes (Acari: Eriophyidae) Occurring on Canada Thistle in Colorado, Nebraska, and Wyoming, U.S.A.1
    Volume 119, Number 5, November and December 2008 483 NEW RECORDS FOR ACERIA ANTHOCOPTES (ACARI: ERIOPHYIDAE) OCCURRING ON CANADA THISTLE IN COLORADO, NEBRASKA, AND WYOMING, U.S.A.1 G. J. Michels Jr.,2 V. A. Carney,2 J. Lydon,3 R. Ochoa,4 and R. L. Renn5 ABSTRACT: Canada thistle [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.] growing in eastern Colorado, Wyoming and western Nebraska were surveyed for the presence and distribution of Aceria anthocoptes (Nal.). Of the 34 sites surveyed in 2004, mites were abundant at 42%, present in lesser numbers at 52%, and not present at 6% of the sites. In 2005, two new sites were added and ten sites sampled in 2004 were revisited. Of these 12 sites, mites were abundant at 17%, present to a lesser extent at 58%, and not present at 25% of the sites. The results demonstrate that Canada thistle growing in this region com- monly harbor A. anthocoptes. How long A. anthocoptes has been present in this region is unknown, however, anecdotal evidence demonstrating a dramatic decline in the population of Canada thistle at one Colorado site from 2000 to 2007 suggests that the mite may have been present since 2002. KEY WORDS: Aceria anthocoptes, Canada thistle, biological control, state records Canada thistle [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.], is a perennial composite that is native to southeastern Europe and the eastern Mediterranean. Presently it occurs throughout most temperate regions of the world (Moore 1975; Holm et al., 1997). While the date of its introduction into the United States is unknown, Canada thistle was recognized as a troublesome weed as early as 1795 when Vermont established legislation for its control (Moore 1975).
    [Show full text]