DOCSLIB.ORG

Lake Superior Lamp 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lake Superior Lamp 2008 LAKE SUPERIOR BINATIONAL PROGRAM Cover photo: Cypress Bay on Lake Superior's north shore. Photo credit: Tim Leblanc, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Printed on recycled paper with soy ink. Lake Superior Lakewide Management Plan (LaMP) 2008 Lake Superior Binational Program Lake Superior LaMP 2008 Acknowledgements Lake Superior Lakewide Management Plan The Lake Superior Lakewide Management Plan 2008 was prepared by the Binational Program’s Superior Work Group with input from various other agencies and organizations including the Lake Superior Binational Forum. We would like to thank the committees of the Superior Work Group for their efforts in completing this document. Member agencies of the Lake Superior Binational Program are: 1854 Authority Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Chippewa-Ottawa Resource Authority Environment Canada Fisheries and Oceans Canada Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Grand Portage Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission Health Canada Keweenaw Bay Indian Community Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Michigan Department of Natural Resources Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minnesota Department of Health Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Ontario Ministry of the Environment Parks Canada Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Forest Service U.S. Geological Survey U.S. National Park Service Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources April 2008 i Lake Superior LaMP 2008 Lake Superior LaMP 2008 Guide to Changes – New files included in LaMP 2008 are bolded. File name Contents How to update your LaMP 2006 binder LS LaMP 2008 Executive Summary Replaces LaMP 2006 Executive Executive Summary Summary LS LaMP 2008 Introduction and Purpose of the Lake Replaces LaMP 2006 Chapter 1 Chapter 1 Superior Lakewide Management Plan LS LaMP 2008 Public Outreach and Education Replaces LaMP 2006 Chapter 2 Chapter 2 LS LaMP 2008 Ecosystem Goals, Indicators, and Replaces LaMP 2006 Chapter 3 Chapter 3 Monitoring LS LaMP 2008 Lake Superior Critical Pollutants Replaces LaMP 2006 update at Chapter 4 Progress Report beginning of Chapter 4 Update LS Chapter 4 Lake Superior Critical Pollutants No change 2000 LS LaMP 2008 Human Health Information Replaces LaMP 2006 update at Chapter 5 beginning of Chapter 5 Update LS Chapter 5 Human Health No change 2000 LS LaMP 2008 Habitat, Terrestrial Wildlife, and Replaces LaMP 2006 update at Chapter 6 Aquatic Communities Progress beginning of Chapter 6 Update Reports LS Chapter 6 Status of Aquatic and Terrestrial No change 2006 Communities and Habitat in the Lake Superior Basin LS LaMP 2008 Developing Sustainability in the Lake Replaces LaMP 2006 update at Chapter 7 Superior Basin: 2008 Progress Report beginning of Chapter 7 Update LS Chapter 7 Developing Sustainability in the Lake No change 2004 Superior Basin LS LaMP 2008 Collaborative Efforts Replaces LaMP 2006 Chapter 8 Chapter 8 LS LaMP 2008 Climate Change New. Insert after LaMP 2008 Chapter 9 Chapter 8 LS LaMP 2008 Lake Superior Areas of Replaces LaMP 2006 Appendix A Appendix A Concern/Remedial Action Plan Summary Matrix and Fact Sheets April 2008 ii Lake Superior LaMP 2008 File name Contents How to update your LaMP 2006 binder LS Appendix B Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) No change 2000 Development Strategy for Lake Superior LS Appendix C The Lake Superior Zero Discharge No change 2006 Demonstration Program and Relationship to Chemical Contaminants in Lake Superior LS Appendix D Mercury Reduction for Lake Superior: No change 2006 A Mercury Reduction Assistance Project for Lake Superior Region Facilities LS LaMP 2008 Proceedings from Making a Great New. Insert after Appendix D Appendix E Lake Superior 2007: A Conference Linking Research, Education and Management LS LaMP 2008 Making A Great Lake Superior New. Insert after Appendix E Appendix F Conference 2007 Evaluation Findings LS glossary Glossary No change 2000 LS acronyms Acronyms and Abbreviations No change 2006 April 2008 iii Lake Superior LaMP 2008 Contents Lake Superior Lakewide Management Plan Acknowledgements Executive Summary Chapter 1 Introduction and Purpose of the Lake Superior Lakewide Management Plan Chapter 2 Public Outreach and Education Chapter 3 Ecosystem Goals, Indicators, and Monitoring Chapter 4 Lake Superior Critical Pollutants Progress Report Chapter 5 Human Health Information Chapter 6 Habitat, Terrestrial Wildlife, and Aquatic Communities Progress Reports Chapter 7 Developing Sustainability in the Lake Superior Basin: 2008 Progress Report Chapter 8 Collaborative Efforts Chapter 9 Climate Change Appendix A Lake Superior Areas of Concern/Remedial Action Plan Summary Matrix and Fact Sheets Appendix E Proceedings from Making a Great Lake Superior 2007: A Conference Linking Research, Education and Management Appendix F Making A Great Lake Superior Conference 2007 Evaluation Findings Note: Appendices B through D are not included in this update – they appear in LaMP 2006. April 2008 iv Lake Superior LaMP 2008 Executive Summary View of Copper Harbor, Michigan, at sunset, June 2007. Photo credit: Roger Eberhardt, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. Lake Superior Lakewide Management Plan 2008 April 2008 i Lake Superior LaMP 2008 April 2008 ii Lake Superior LaMP 2008 Executive Summary BACKGROUND Since 1991, as called for in the Canada-U.S. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, the Lake Superior Lakewide Management Plan (LaMP) has provided an assessment of the state of the Lake Superior ecosystem, including its ecological impairments, emerging issues and their causes, and gaps in knowledge which require further research and monitoring. The LaMP has also identified additional actions required to achieve LaMP goals and targets. The Lake Superior Binational Program partners are continuing to develop and implement the LaMP. As will be documented in this chapter and throughout the entire LaMP 2008 document, the many accomplishments of both the Zero Discharge Demonstration Program (ZDDP) and the Broader Program (the two components of the Binational Program) reinforce the concept of the Lake Superior LaMP as an exemplary model for binational cooperative ecosystem management of the Great Lakes. Affirmation of the Lake Superior LaMP as a Model for Ecosystem Management With the release and publication of LaMP 2008, the U.S., Canada, Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Ontario, Tribal/First Nation and other Binational Program partners renew their commitment to a strong, active, vigorous LaMP document and process, and continue to affirm that the LaMP is uniquely positioned to serve as the most effective ecosystem management model for the Lake Superior basin. The partners affirm that the Lake Superior LaMP should continue to provide, in partnership with other binational programs, the guiding framework for the management interventions needed to maintain and restore the “physical, chemical and biological” integrity of the lake, as well as the place to define and harmonize agency and partner commitments to those actions. Furthermore, as the Lake Superior and Great Lakes ecosystems face increasingly serious environmental threats, the LaMP must evolve and adapt to remain the best model to address these challenges. The LaMP will do so through an “adaptive management” approach. Although there are several new Great Lakes basinwide restoration and protection initiatives, we must resist efforts to completely redo the existing successful “governance” structure of the Lake Superior LaMP. We must coordinate priorities but recognize the comparative advantage of the Lake Superior LaMP. The partners that have created and implemented the LaMP have, among other functions, committed to a process that provides an arena for discussions, recommendations, and decisions among governments; identifies and addresses current high priority issues; facilitates initiation and implementation of joint commitments in a way that minimizes the duplication of effort; identifies funding priorities; pools and leverages resources; documents actions and projects undertaken by Binational Program partners; provides outreach and education on these projects April 2008 iii Lake Superior LaMP 2008 and the ecosystem status of the Lake; facilitates coordinated research and monitoring; provides opportunities for stakeholder input; and provides a venue for discussion of lake resource issues. In sum, the governmental partners that have committed to building and sustaining the Binational Program, and thereby the LaMP 2008, reaffirm their support for, and commitment to, the LaMP process and the LaMP document itself. The Lake Superior Binational Program – Background The LaMP contains ecosystem goals and targets and funded and proposed (non-funded) actions for restoration and protection of the Lake Superior ecosystem. Actions include commitments by the government partners as well as suggested voluntary actions that could be taken by non- governmental partners. The first LaMP document, published in 2000, identified these actions in six ecosystem themes: critical pollutants, aquatic communities, terrestrial wildlife communities, habitat, human health and sustainability. Since then, each biennial LaMP update has reported accomplishments, status toward goals, challenges and next steps. LaMP 2008 LaMP 2008 builds on the previous LaMP documents although many of the original LaMP 2000 chapters have been revised,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Indiana Species April 2007
    Fishes of Indiana April 2007 The Wildlife Diversity Section (WDS) is responsible for the conservation and management of over 750 species of nongame and endangered wildlife. The list of Indiana's species was compiled by WDS biologists based on accepted taxonomic standards. The list will be periodically reviewed and updated. References used for scientific names are included at the bottom of this list. ORDER FAMILY GENUS SPECIES COMMON NAME STATUS* CLASS CEPHALASPIDOMORPHI Petromyzontiformes Petromyzontidae Ichthyomyzon bdellium Ohio lamprey lampreys Ichthyomyzon castaneus chestnut lamprey Ichthyomyzon fossor northern brook lamprey SE Ichthyomyzon unicuspis silver lamprey Lampetra aepyptera least brook lamprey Lampetra appendix American brook lamprey Petromyzon marinus sea lamprey X CLASS ACTINOPTERYGII Acipenseriformes Acipenseridae Acipenser fulvescens lake sturgeon SE sturgeons Scaphirhynchus platorynchus shovelnose sturgeon Polyodontidae Polyodon spathula paddlefish paddlefishes Lepisosteiformes Lepisosteidae Lepisosteus oculatus spotted gar gars Lepisosteus osseus longnose gar Lepisosteus platostomus shortnose gar Amiiformes Amiidae Amia calva bowfin bowfins Hiodonotiformes Hiodontidae Hiodon alosoides goldeye mooneyes Hiodon tergisus mooneye Anguilliformes Anguillidae Anguilla rostrata American eel freshwater eels Clupeiformes Clupeidae Alosa chrysochloris skipjack herring herrings Alosa pseudoharengus alewife X Dorosoma cepedianum gizzard shad Dorosoma petenense threadfin shad Cypriniformes Cyprinidae Campostoma anomalum central stoneroller
    [Show full text]
  • Community Profile  Funded By
    Our Vision: Dorion will be a welcoming community offering an exceptional quality of life for all. Community Profile Funded By: THE TOWNSHIP OF DORION Community Profile TABLE OF CONTENTS Dorion, Ontario: Overview ...........................................................5 Population & Labour Force ..........................................................7 Municipal Services .....................................................................11 Health Care & Housing ..............................................................12 Land Inventory ...........................................................................15 Parks, Recreation & Tourism ......................................................17 Transportation, Utilities & Telecommunications ........................18 Climate .......................................................................................20 Physical Geography ...................................................................21 Learning Institutions ...................................................................23 Economic Development & Future Growth .................................24 Contact Us .................................................................................25 Community Profile Community Profile DORION, ONTARIO: OVERVIEW “Explore Dorion in Canyon Country” Dorion is a small rural community in Northwestern Thunder Bay regional hospital and international Ontario with a population of 380 people and a airport. As the economy continues to experience land mass of 212 square kilometres.
    [Show full text]
  • Hog Island/Newton Creek Habitat Restoration Project St. Louis River Area of Concern, Superior, Wisconsin NOAA Great Lakes Habitat Restoration Program June 2011
    Hog Island/Newton Creek Habitat Restoration Project St. Louis River Area of Concern, Superior, Wisconsin NOAA Great Lakes Habitat Restoration Program June 2011 Background Hog Island is a place of scenic beauty and high ecological value. Located at the “headwaters of Lake Superior,” at the far western end of the lake within the city of Superior, Wisconsin, the area is regionally important both as an ecological resource and a recreational and scenic amenity. For many years the area has served as a disposal site for dredge spoils, a railway yard, and a repository for industrial byproducts. In 1987, the St. Louis River, including Hog Island, was designated as an Area of Concern (AOC) due to numerous beneficial use impairments (BUIs), including loss of fish and wildlife habitat, degradation of fish and wildlife populations, degradation of benthos, beach closings, and others. Despite these conditions, Hog Island, Hog Island Inlet, Newton Creek, Allouez Bay, and Pokegama Bay are extremely important for local and migratory fish and wildlife populations. Ecological restoration within these areas through NOAA’s Great Lakes Habitat Restoration Program will provide essential habitat for rare, threatened and endangered species; control invasive vegetation and other threats to ecological viability; improve water and sediment quality; and provide recreation and an aesthetic amenity for local residents and visitors. Moving from Remediation to Restoration Remediation of contaminated materials at Hog Island/Newton Creek was completed in 2005 after a 10‐year, multi‐phase cleanup process. During the final phase 60,000 tons of contaminated sediments were removed from the lower portions of Newton Creek and Hog Island Inlet.
    [Show full text]
  • 38 Lake Superior 1925 1954 2017
    30 34 1954 35 24 8 4 5 7 3 9 21 36 17 KEWEENAW 25 20 38 32 HOUGHTON 19 10 18 29 28 37 6 39 13 14 15 16 ONTONAGON BARAGA 11 1 2 33 26 23 22 LUCE 31 12 27 GOGEBIC MARQUETTE ALGER CHIPPEWA IRON SCHOOLCRAFT DICKINSON MACKINAC DELTA 120 97 87 69 81 107 95 49 79 75 106 51 83 109 67 56 74 57 94 64 90 70 86 98 40 59 66 85 MENOMINEE 43 41 EMMET 89 78 53 1925 103 104 71 44 CHEBOYGAN PRESQUE ISLE 105102 63 48 CHARLEVOIX 96 73 58 112 60 ANTRIM OTSEGO MONTMORENCY ALPENA 82 LEELANAU 65 45 GRAND KALKASKA CRAWFORD OSCODA ALCONA 110 BENZIE TRAVERSE MANISTEE WEXFORD MISSAUKEE ROSCOMMON OGEMAW IOSCO 55 111 100 ARENAC 42 91 84 99 MASON LAKE OSCEOLA CLAREGLADWIN 54 HURON 92 BAY 108 52 OCEANA MECOSTA ISABELLA MIDLAND NEWAYGO TUSCOLA SANILAC 101 80 MONTCALM GRATIOT SAGINAW 61 MUSKEGON 62 GENESEE LAPEER 46 47 ST. CLAIR KENT SHIAWASSEE 88 OTTAWA IONIA CLINTON 93 50 MACOMB 119 OAKLAND 114 68 ALLEGANIBARRY EATONLNGHAM IVINGSTON 115 113 116 121 72 2017 VAN BURENJKALAMAZOO CALHOUNWACKSON WASHTENAW AYNE 118 76 77 117 BERRIEN CASS ST. JOSEPH BRANCH HILLSDALE LENAWEE MONROE tannard Rock S LAKE SUPERIOR 38 On August 26, 1835, while piloting the American Fur Company remote location. Coastguardsman gave the light station the nickname vessel John Jacob Astor, Capt. Charles C. Stannard blew off course “Stranded Rock” to underscore the isolation, and it was designated during a storm and discovered a previously unrecorded reef about a “stag station,” meaning no wives or other family members could be 25 miles from the Keweenaw Peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • NOAA Great Lakes Charts Catalog Reference
    Charts on the Great Lakes and Adjacent Waters 96° 94° Data On the Great Lakes System Chart Number Title Scale Chart Number Title Scale Chart Number Title Scale LAKE LAKE LAKE LAKE LAKE LAKE 14500 Great Lakes—Lake Champlain to Lake of the Woods 1:1,500,000 14847 Toledo Harbor 1:20,000 14915 Little Bay de Noc 1:30,000 GENERAL LAKE DIMENSION SUPERIOR MICHIGAN HURON ST. CLAIR ERIE ONTARIO ST. LAWRENCE RIVER Entrance Channel 1:40,000 14916 SMALL-CRAFT BOOK CHART Length in miles 350 307 206 26 241 193 14770 Morristown, N.Y. to Butternut Bay, Ont. 1:15,000 14848 Detroit River 1:30,000 Lake Winnebago and Lower Fox River (book of 34 charts) Various 14850 Lake St. Clair 1:60,000 14917 Menominee and Marinette Harbors 1:15,000 14500 Breadth in miles 160 118(1) 183(2) 24 57 53 14771 Butternut Bay, Ont., to Ironsides lsland., N.Y. 1:15,000 Length in coastline (including islands) 2,730 1,640 3,830(3) 257 871 712 14772 Ironsides lsland, N.Y., to Bingham lsland, Ont. 1:15,000 14852 St. Clair River 1:40,000 14918 Head of Green Bay, including Fox River below De Pere 1:25,000 Area in square miles 14773 Gananoque, Ont., to St. Lawrence Park. N.Y. 1:15,000 Head of St. Clair River 1:15,000 Green Bay 1:10,000 1450 Water Surface, United States 20,600(4) 22,300(5) 9,150(6) 198(7) 4,980 3,560(8) 14774 Round lsland, N.Y., and Gananoque, Ont., to Wolfe l., Ont.
    [Show full text]
  • Life at Michigan Tech
    WELCOME A brief tour of the Michigan Tech campus and the greater community 1 mtu.edu 2 3 Sunrise on the Keweenaw Waterway Welcome to the banks of the largest Welcome to freshwater lake in the world. To Michigan national parks, deep history, and thousands of acres of forestland. Technological Welcome to four seasons, year-round University. adventures, and vibrant community. Welcome to the Copper Country. The community. The campus. Welcome home. Table of Contents Table of Contents The Copper Country 6 The Keweenaw Peninsula 8 The Climate 10 The Great Outdoors 11 The Community 14 Houghton and Hancock 18 Top-Tier Community Schools 19 Healthcare in the UP 20 Commitment to Families 21 Local Athletics 22 Travel 23 The Campus 24 Campus Map 26 Exploring Campus 28 Arts and Recreation 30 Michigan Tech: Beyond the Campus 32 The Copper Country 6 The view from here: Copper Harbor from the Brockway Mountain lookout. Brockway Mountain Drive is the highest paved road between the Rockies and the Alleghenies. Reaching into Lake Superior from the northernmost tip of Michigan’s Upper Peninsula is the Keweenaw Peninsula. Home to hardwoods, sandstone cliffs, and lake-effect snow, the Keweenaw’s beauty is unparalleled. 7 Map courtesy of the The Keweenaw Keweenaw Convention and Visitor’s Bureau Peninsula Pronounced kee-win-awe, the close view of “hawk highway.” Stay forest. Isle Royale boasts no roads peninsula was formed by ancient long enough to watch the sun of any kind—all travel is by foot or lava flows, giant ice sheets, and set and, if you’re lucky, catch the boat.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 St. Louis River Summit Proceedings
    St. Louis River Estuary Science Summit 2012 March 8 & 9 University of Wisconsin - Superior Yellowjacket Union St. Louis River Estuary Summit (March 2012) Page 2 Acknowledgments Thanks are owed to many people and organizations for support of this very grass-roots event. Special thanks to the following organizations who provided funding and in-kind contributions: Lake Superior National Estuarine Research Reserve University of Wisconsin Extension University of Wisconsin – Superior Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. Barr Engineering Company US Environmental Protection Agency – Mid-Continent Ecology Division Enbridge Engineering Minnesota’s Lake Superior Coastal Program Wisconsin Coastal Management Program Wisconsin Sea Grant West Wisconsin Land Trust Limnotech Minnesota Sea Grant Organizing committee: Shon Schooler, Lake Superior NERR Sarah Johnson, Northland College John Jereczek, MN DNR Nick Danz, UW Superior Pat Collins, US FWS David Bolgrien, US EPA Rick Gitar, Fond du Lac Reservation Editors: Shon Schooler, Seth Bliss, Ralph Garono, and Patrick Collins Published by The Lake Superior National Estuarine Research Reserve, Superior, WI LSNERR Document number: 2012-R-1002 Cover photo by Sue OHalloran Interior Photos by Michel Anderson (www.singingcanoe.smugmug.com) St. Louis River Estuary Summit (March 2012) Page 3 Contents Introduction..................................................................................................................................6 Abstracts for Oral Presentations ..................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Attraits Touristiques
    A Québec D C A N A TERRE-NEUVE- ET-LABRADOR Baie d'Hudson et Québec QUÉBEC Ontario Î.-P.-É. N.-B. ONTARIO Québec N.-É. découverte Montréal Ottawa Explorez les villes branchées de Montréal et Toronto I S Toronto, imprégnez-vous d’histoire dans les rues N OCÉAN - U ATLANTIQUE et É T A T S de Québec, visitez les grands musées d’Ottawa, Ontario partez en escapade dans les magnifi ques régions de Charlevoix et des Grands Lacs, naviguez sur le Saint- le plaisir de mieux voyager Laurent à la recherche des baleines et laissez-vous ébahir par les chutes du Niagara. art de vivre Choisissez parmi une sélection d’adresses triées sur le volet, des chaleureux gîtes touristiques aux grands hôtels, des sympathiques petits restos de quartier aux grandes tables raffi nées et créatives. plein air Parcourez les superbes parcs du Québec et de l’Ontario et découvrez les plus beaux sites pour la randonnée, le vélo, la baignade, le canot et le kayak, le ski et la planche à neige, la motoneige et l’observation de la faune. coups de cœur Vivez des expériences mémorables et sortez des sentiers battus en vous laissant inspirer par les suggestions de nos auteurs. conseils Québec et Ontario Voyagez en toute liberté grâce aux renseignements utiles et aux cartes précises d’Ulysse. www.guidesulysse.com Suivez-nous sur Facebook et Twitter @GuidesUlysse 32,95 $ / 27,99 € TTC en France ISBN : 978-2-89464-575-8 Livre entier et extraits disponibles en format numérique PC_Quebec-Ontario(5758).indd 1-3 12/10/23 15:04:59 Rivière-Saint-Jean Baie-Johan-Beetz Normandin Albanel Dolbeau-Mistassini
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species
    Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Endangered species From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Main page Contents For other uses, see Endangered species (disambiguation). Featured content "Endangered" redirects here. For other uses, see Endangered (disambiguation). Current events An endangered species is a species which has been categorized as likely to become Random article Conservation status extinct . Endangered (EN), as categorized by the International Union for Conservation of Donate to Wikipedia by IUCN Red List category Wikipedia store Nature (IUCN) Red List, is the second most severe conservation status for wild populations in the IUCN's schema after Critically Endangered (CR). Interaction In 2012, the IUCN Red List featured 3079 animal and 2655 plant species as endangered (EN) Help worldwide.[1] The figures for 1998 were, respectively, 1102 and 1197. About Wikipedia Community portal Many nations have laws that protect conservation-reliant species: for example, forbidding Recent changes hunting , restricting land development or creating preserves. Population numbers, trends and Contact page species' conservation status can be found in the lists of organisms by population. Tools Extinct Contents [hide] What links here Extinct (EX) (list) 1 Conservation status Related changes Extinct in the Wild (EW) (list) 2 IUCN Red List Upload file [7] Threatened Special pages 2.1 Criteria for 'Endangered (EN)' Critically Endangered (CR) (list) Permanent link 3 Endangered species in the United
    [Show full text]
  • Population in Goulais Bay, Lake Superior
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264864682 Identification of a robust Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens Rafinesque, 1917) population in Goulais Bay, Lake Superior Article in Journal of Applied Ichthyology · August 2014 DOI: 10.1111/jai.12566 CITATIONS READS 0 33 5 authors, including: Thomas C. Pratt Jennie Pearce Fisheries and Oceans Canada Pearce & Associates Ecological Research 49 PUBLICATIONS 489 CITATIONS 42 PUBLICATIONS 3,610 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Thomas C. Pratt on 08 April 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately. Journal of Applied Ichthyology J. Appl. Ichthyol. (2014), 1–7 Received: December 6, 2013 © 2014 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada Accepted: February 24, 2014 Journal of Applied Ichthyology © 2014 Blackwell Verlag GmbH doi: 10.1111/jai.12566 ISSN 0175–8659 Identification of a robust Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens Rafinesque, 1917) population in Goulais Bay, Lake Superior By T. C. Pratt1, W. M. Gardner1, J. Pearce2, S. Greenwood3 and S. C. Chong3 1Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Sault Ste Marie, ON, Canada; 2Pearce & Associates Ecological Research, Sault Ste Marie, ON, Canada; 3Upper Great Lakes Management Unit, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Sault Ste Marie, ON, Canada Summary anthropogenic activities due to specific life history character- Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens Rafinesque, 1917) in istics, including slow growth and late maturation, intermit- Lake Superior are greatly depressed from their historic abun- tent spawning intervals, and habitat requirements such as dance, and few populations meet the rehabilitation goals specific temperature, flow velocities and substrate require- identified by management agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Regulations, 2020-2021, Available Online, from Your License Distributor, Or Any DNR Service Center
    Wisconsin Fishing.. it's fun and easy! To use this pamphlet, follow these 5 easy steps: Restrictions: Be familiar with What's New on page 4 and the License Requirements 1 and Statewide Fishing Restrictions on pages 8-11. Trout fishing: If you plan to fish for trout, please see the separate inland trout 2 regulations booklet, Guide to Wisconsin Trout Fishing Regulations, 2020-2021, available online, from your license distributor, or any DNR Service Center. Special regulations: Check for special regulations on the water you will be fishing 3 in the section entitled Special Regulations-Listed by County beginning on page 28. Great Lakes, Winnebago System Waters, and Boundary Waters: If you are 4 planning to fish on the Great Lakes, their tributaries, Winnebago System waters or waters bordering other states, check the appropriate tables on pages 64–76. Statewide rules: If the water you will be fishing is not found in theSpecial Regulations- 5 Listed by County and is not a Great Lake, Winnebago system, or boundary water, statewide rules apply. See the regulation table for General Inland Waters on pages 62–63 for seasons, length and bag limits, listed by species. ** This pamphlet is an interpretive summary of Wisconsin’s fishing laws and regulations. For complete fishing laws and regulations, including those that are implemented after the publica- tion of this pamphlet, consult the Wisconsin State Statutes Chapter 29 or the Administrative Code of the Department of Natural Resources. Consult the legislative website - http://docs. legis.wi.gov - for more information. For the most up-to-date version of this pamphlet, go to dnr.wi.gov search words, “fishing regulations.
    [Show full text]