DOCSLIB.ORG

Lower Mccloud River Watershed Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lower Mccloud River Watershed Analysis Lower McCloud River Watershed Analysis Shasta-Trinity National Forest Shasta-McCloud Management Unit 3/18/98 Preface This Watershed Analysis is presented as part of the Aquatic Conservation Strategy adopted for the President’s Plan (Record of Decision for Amendments to Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management Planning Documents within the Range of the Northern Spotted Owl, including Standards and Guidelines for Management of Habitat for Late- Successional and Old-Growth Related Species (ROD)). The preparation of a Watershed Analysis for the Lower McCloud River Watershed follows direction in the Aquatic Conservation Strategy that requires watershed analysis “for roadless areas in non-Key Watersheds, and Riparian Reserves prior to determining how land management activities meet Aquatic Conservation Strategy objectives” (ROD B-20). This document follows the format provided in Part 2 of Ecosystem Analysis at the Watershed Scale: Federal Guide for Watershed Analysis - Version 2.2 (August 1995). This format consists of six steps: 1. Characterization of the watershed 2. Identification of issues and key questions 3. Description of current conditions 4. Description of reference conditions 5. Synthesis and interpretation of information 6. Recommendations This document is guided by two levels of analysis: • core topics - provide a broad, comprehensive understanding of the watershed. Core topics are provided in the Federal Guide for Watershed Analysis (8/95) to address basic ecological conditions, processes, and interactions at work in the watershed. • issues - focus the analysis on the main management questions to be addressed. Issues are those resource problems, concerns, or other factors upon which the analysis will be focused. Some of these issues prompted initiation of the analysis. Other issues were developed from public input in response to scoping or were identified by the team during the analysis process. Key analysis questions are developed for each issue. These questions are organized by analysis step to help focus the analysis and to provide organization to the document while addressing the issues. Interdisciplinary Team Dusty Miller Team Leader, Editor/Writer Shasta-McCloud Management Unit Heidi Dias Wildlife Biologist Shasta-Trinity National Forest Michael Bornstein Wildlife Biologist U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Tom Ward Ecologist Shasta-McCloud Management Unit Steve Bachmann Hydrologist Shasta-McCloud Management Unit Dale Etter Fuels Management Officer Shasta-McCloud Management Unit Jeff Huhtala Transportation Planner Shasta-McCloud Management Unit Joe Zustak Fisheries Biologist Shasta-McCloud Management Unit Peter Van Susteren Earth Science Shasta-McCloud Management Unit Additional Agency Contributors Elaine Sundahl Archaeologist Shasta-McCloud Management Unit Jonna Cooper GIS Coordinator Shasta-McCloud Management Unit Abel Jasso Geologist Shasta-McCloud Management Unit Ed Hatakeda Recreation Specialist Shasta-McCloud Management Unit Vivian Parker Botanist Shasta-McCloud Management Unit Table of Contents Table of Contents Preface Page Chapter 1 - Characterization of the Watershed.............................................. 1-1 Location...................................................................................................... 1-1 Watershed Setting........................................................................................ 1-1 Relationship to Larger-Scale Settings........................................................... 1-2 Physical Features.......................................................................................... 1-3 Biological Features....................................................................................... 1-6 Human Uses................................................................................................. 1-10 Land Allocation and Management Direction................................................. 1-11 Chapter 2 - Issues and Key Questions............................................................. 2-1 Catastrophic Wildfire................................................................................... 2-2 River Use..................................................................................................... 2-2 Road Impacts............................................................................................... 2-3 Late-Successional Reserve........................................................................... 2-4 Chapter 3 - Current Conditions....................................................................... 3-1 Physical Features.......................................................................................... 3-1 Biological Features....................................................................................... 3-13 Human Uses................................................................................................. 3-43 Chapter 4 - Reference Conditions................................................................... 4-1 Historic Overview........................................................................................ 4-1 Physical Features.......................................................................................... 4-4 Biological Features....................................................................................... 4-15 Human Uses................................................................................................. 4-30 Chapter 5 - Interpretations.............................................................................. 5-1 Catastrophic Wildfire................................................................................... 5-2 River Use..................................................................................................... 5-4 Road Impacts............................................................................................... 5-5 Late-Successional Reserves.......................................................................... 5-7 Erosion Processes........................................................................................ 5-9 Hydrology.................................................................................................... 5-11 Stream Channel............................................................................................ 5-12 Water Quality............................................................................................... 5-14 Vegetation................................................................................................... 5-15 Species and Habitats.................................................................................... 5-17 Human Uses................................................................................................. 5-19 Non-native Plants......................................................................................... 5-21 Land Allocation Adjustment......................................................................... 5-22 i Table of Contents Page Chapter 6 - Recommendations......................................................................... 6-1 Fuels Management....................................................................................... 6-2 Riparian Reserves......................................................................................... 6-5 River Use..................................................................................................... 6-6 Road Management....................................................................................... 6-7 Wood Products............................................................................................ 6-10 Recreation Opportunities.............................................................................. 6-11 Research Needs............................................................................................ 6-12 Control/Eradication of Non-native Plants..................................................... 6-14 Land Allocation Adjustment......................................................................... 6-15 Survey, Inventory, Monitor.......................................................................... 6-16 Literature Cited Appendix Appendix A Possible Management Practices Appendix B Management Direction Appendix C List of Wildlife Species Appendix D Wildlife Habitat Descriptions Appendix E History of the Lower McCloud River Watershed ii Table of Contents List of Maps Map # Map Title Location Map 1 Vicinity Map.................................................................... follows page 1-1 Map 2 Land Ownership............................................................... follows page 1-1 Map 3 McCloud River Basin....................................................... follows page 1-2 Map 4 Dominant Physical Features.............................................. follows page 1-3 Map 5 Transportation System...................................................... follows page 1-3 Map 6 Late-Successional Reserve RC-335.................................. follows page 1-7 Map 7 Adjacent Late-Successional Reserves............................... follows page 1-7 Map 8 Land Allocations.............................................................. follows page 1-11 Map 9 Management Areas and Prescriptions............................... follows page 1-11 Map 10 Riparian Reserves............................................................. follows page 3-2 Map 11 Geologic Hazard.............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mccloud Area Recreation Guide
    McCloud Area Recreation Guide McCloud Station • Shasta-McCloud Management Unit • Shasta-Trinity National Forest SHASTA ajmwcV814 TRINITY This Recreation Opportunity Guide provides a brief overview of recreation facilities and opportunities available in the McCloud area of the Shasta-Trinity National Forest. Whether you are planning to go camping, fishing, hiking, boating, picnicking, snow­ mobiling, cross country skiing or sight seeing, the choices for recreation are almost unlimited. Recreation plus… During the late spring, summer and early fall, the McCloud River is the most popular attraction in this area, offering fishing, swimming, camping and spectacular scenery. During the winter months, snowmobiling, cross country skiing and downhill skiing are the top ranking outdoor opportunities. Developed campgrounds and facilities… Except for Harris Springs, Cattle Camp, Trout Creek Campgrounds and Lake McCloud Boat Ramp, all developed campgrounds and day use facilities are located along the McCloud River. All campgrounds are on a first come-first served basis and have a 14 day stay limit. River route… The McCloud River parallels Highway 89 from its source near Dead Horse Summit to Fowler’s Campground. There it turns south and continues through private property to Lake McCloud. At Lake McCloud, the river again flows through National Forest lands to a point several miles below Ah-Di-Na Campground, plus several other areas downstream to the McCloud Nature Preserve. From here, the river passes through mostly private property and public access is extremely limited until the river enters Shasta Lake. Dispersed camping… If the improved campgrounds around McCloud are too crowded and confining, you may want to try camping somewhere else.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Mt. Shasta 70305 N
    C ITY OF MT . S HASTA F REEZE M INI -S TORAGE AND C AR W ASH P ROJECT REVISED AND RECIRCULATED INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2017072042 Prepared for: CITY OF MT. SHASTA 70305 N. MT. SHASTA BLVD. MT. SHASTA, CA 96067 Prepared by: 2729 PROSPECT PARK DRIVE, SUITE 220 RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670 JUNE 2019 C ITY OF MT . S HASTA F REEZE M INI -S TORAGE AND C AR W ASH P ROJECT REVISED AND RECIRCULATED INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2017072042 Prepared for: CITY OF MT. SHASTA 305 N. MT. SHASTA BLVD. MT. SHASTA, CA 96067 Prepared by: MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL 2729 PROSPECT PARK DRIVE, SUITE 220 RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670 JUNE 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction and Regulatory Guidance ................................................................................... 1.0-1 1.2 Lead Agency .................................................................................................................................. 1.0-1 1.3 Purpose and Document Organization ...................................................................................... 1.0-1 1.4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts ........................................................................................ 1.0-2 2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.1 Project Location ............................................................................................................................. 3.0-1 3.2 Existing Use and Conditions ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Shasta Dam Fish Passage Evaluation
    Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Contents Contents Page Chapter 1 Introduction ................................................................................ 1-1 Project Background ........................................................................................ 1-3 Central Valley Salmon and Steelhead Recovery Plan ............................. 1-4 2009 NMFS Biological Opinion .............................................................. 1-5 Shasta Dam Fish Passage Evaluation ...................................................... 1-6 Purpose and Need .......................................................................................... 1-7 Objectives ...................................................................................................... 1-7 Study Area ..................................................................................................... 1-8 River Selection Process............................................................................ 1-9 Shasta Lake ............................................................................................ 1-10 Upper Sacramento River Watershed .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Armenians
    THE ARMENIANS By C.F. DIXON-JOHNSON “Whosoever does wrong to a Christian or a Jew shall find me his accuser on the day of judgment.” (EL KORAN) Printed and Published by GEO TOULMIN & SONS, LTD. Northgate, Blackburn. 1916 Preface The following pages were first read as a paper before the “Société d’Etudes Ethnographiques.” They have since been amplified and are now being published at the request of a number of friends, who believe that the public should have an opportunity of judging whether or not “the Armenian Question” has another side than that which has been recently so assiduously promulgated throughout the Western World. Though the championship of Greek, Bulgarian and other similar “Christian, civilized methods of fighting,” as contrasted with “Moslem atrocities” in the Balkans and Asia Minor, has been so strenuously undertaken by Lord Bryce and others, the more recent developments in the Near East may perhaps already have opened the eyes of a great many thinking people to the realization that, in sacrificing the traditional friendship of the Turk to all this more or less sectarian clamor, British diplomacy has really done nothing better than to exchange the solid and advantageous reality for a most elusive and unreliable, if not positively dangerous, set of shadows. It seems illogical that the same party which recalled the officials (and among them our present War Minister) appointed by Lord Beaconsfield to assist the Turkish Government in reforming their administration and collecting the revenue in Asia Minor, and which on the advent of the Young Turks refused to lend British Administrators to whom ample and plenary powers were assured, should now, in its eagerness to vilify the Turk, lose sight of their own mistakes which have led in the main to the conditions of which it complains, and should so utterly condemn its own former policy.
    [Show full text]
  • North Fork Ranch 2,822 Acres Tehama County, CA
    North Fork Ranch 2,822 acres Tehama County, CA BILL WRIGHT SHASTA LAND SERVICES, INC. 358 Hartnell Avenue, Suite C Redding, CA 96002 cell (530) 941-8100 www.ranch-lands.com North Fork Ranch 2,822 acres West of Red Bluff & Cottonwood, CA LOCATION: The North Fork Ranch is located just about 30 minute drive east of Red Bluff and Cottonwood, CA which is about halfway between Portland, OR and San Francisco, CA. DESCRIPTION: The ranch consists of about 2,822 acres. Good quality winter range ranch with rolling to some steep oak and covered hills, open more level areas, and some steeper rangeland areas – this is a pretty good winter range. Stock ponds and seasonal drainages provide livestock and wildlife habitat. Elevations range from about 800 feet to 1,000 feet. Winter temperatures are cool but not high elevation cold. Interior access is provided by a gated entrance off of CA State Highway 36 West and then a private graveled road into to the ranch. Pretty good system of roads and trails that provide good access through the interior of the ranch. ACRES: Approximately 2,822 acres; 8 Tehama County Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 003-040-06, 003-040-07, 003-070-06, 003-080-01, 003-080-02, 003-080-003, 003-080-06, and 003-120-01 IMPROVEMENTS: None. Plenty of room to build your own with a perfect view! ZONING: The ranch is in the “Williamson Act” with 160 acre minimum parcel sizes. The “Williamson Act” results in lower real estate taxes - taxes are computed based upon a properties agricultural income rather than assessed on current market value.
    [Show full text]
  • Winnemem Wintu Tribe 14840 Bear Mountain Rd Redding, CA 96003
    Winnemem Wintu Tribe 14840 Bear Mountain Rd Redding, CA 96003 =<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>= Shasta Dam Raise Project January 14, 2019 c/o: Stantec 3301 C Street, Suite 1900 Sacramento, CA 95816 Introduction: On November 30, 2018 Westlands Water District (Westlands or WWD) issued an Initial Study and Notice of Preparation (IS/NOP) stating that it was the lead agency for a Shasta Dam Raise Project (SDRP or Project) [formerly known as the Shasta Lake Water Resources Investigation (SLWRI), and began soliciting scoping comments to prepare a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) draft environmental impact report (EIR) for the Project. This Project would increase the existing height of Shasta Dam by 18.5 feet and purportedly expand the capacity of Shasta Lake by up to 634,000- acre feet. In response to this solicitation, the Winnemem Wintu Tribe (WWT) issues the following comments, assertions, and raises questions about the project’s legality. From reading the IS/NOP WWD does not define who is actually the proponent of the project. A lay person reading the IS/NOP would get the impression that it is WWD who will carry out this project, yet WWD makes no distinction. No proponent is identified. This omission renders the project description as deficient. The Project proponent must also be identified in order that transparency is maintained by WWD. Who is funding this EIR effort? If the EIR finds that the Project must be amended to avoid, lessen or mitigate environmental effects, who will amend the Project? Also, from reading the IS/NOP it appears that WWD has made no initial findings of its own, but relies heavily if not entirely on Reclamation’s SWLRI Final EIS released in 2014, and Reclamation’s SWLRI Final Feasibility Report released in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • How Things Fly Presentations
    1A Crawford, Jasmine I Eagle 1A Elliott, Noah C Bumble Bee 1A Patel, Kishan H Hornet 1A Sutton, Ashley K Turkey 1B Ablorh, Marcellina A Birds 1B Bailey-Simpson, Tyron D Bumble Bee 1B Butler, Vidal M Hornet 1B Castor, Carnie Wasp 1B Clark, Micaylah J Butterfly 1B Fairley, Nicholas M Duck 1B Gaymer, Nicolas Falcon 1B Gomez, Luis G Eagle 1B Haines, Tynise N Geese 1B Harden, Travis E Ostrich 1B Henry, Nigel D Turkey 1B Jenkins, Myae'h J Birds 1B Johnson, Jeremy A Bumble Bee 1B Jordan, Justin A Hornet 1B Kovach, Alecia A Wasp 1B Marshall, Allison V Butterfly 1B Marshall, Alyssa M Duck 1B McLennon, Michael K Falcon 1B Milazzo, Matthew M Eagle 1B Okwuosa, Arinze A Geese 1B Smith, Chasity R Ostrich 1B Thomas, Jada L Turkey 1B Warren, Dierra L Birds 1B Weems, Destiny K Bumble Bee 2A Anderson, Jeremiah O Birds 2A Barrett, Dakota A Bumble Bee 2A Bates, Brooklyn J Hornet 2A Blue II, Neil Wasp 2A Brock, Devin A Butterfly 2A Clark, Jasmine M Duck 2A Coleman, Arrienna D Falcon 2A Fisher, M'Kayla M Eagle 2A Harris, Johnathan L Geese 2A Heintz, Michael H Ostrich 2A Hester, Jazlyn A Turkey 2A Hobbs, Kamilah D Birds 2A Jackson, Janise N Bumble Bee 2A Jenkins II, Harrison C Hornet 2A Jones, Lance K Wasp 2A Jones, Shicorreus L Butterfly 2A Logan, Tyshawn A Duck 2A Maduchem-Izundu, KachikwuluFalcon M 2A Matthews, Zackary G Eagle 2A Nguyen, Jimmy Geese 2A Norfleet, Nyhjae Q Ostrich 2A Paragon-singh, Andrew W Turkey 2A Parrish Brown, Jordan C Birds 2A Petty, Kristina A Bumble Bee 2A Pitchford, Colin C Hornet 2A Singleton, Isaiah D Wasp 2A Tucker, Cody D Butterfly
    [Show full text]
  • Report Lists Norcal's Mccloud River Among
    Report Lists NorCal’s McCloud River Among Nation’s ‘Most Endangered’ Jefferson Public Radio | By Erik Neumann Published April 13, 2021 at 4:40 PM PDT The McCloud River in Northern California is included in American Rivers' list of America's Most Endangered Rivers of 2021. Tracey Diaz Via American Rivers The McCloud River in Northern California is among the nation’s most endangered, according to a new report from the conservation group American Rivers. In a report released Tuesday, the McCloud was chosen as a river with significance to local people and wildlife, and because the federal Bureau of Reclamation wants to raise the height of Shasta Dam. “At this particular moment there has been a proposal to rise that dam another 18.5 feet. That would inundate three quarters of a mile more of the McCloud River,” says Amy Merrill, a California representative of American Rivers. The McCloud feeds into the Sacramento River, which is blocked by the 600-foot-tall Shasta Dam. It stores 41% of the water for the Central Valley Project, which supplies water for irrigation and for the metro areas of Sacramento and San Francisco. But upriver, the McCloud supports a series of rare and threatened species including the Shasta snow-wreath, Pacific fisher, Shasta salamander and McCloud River Redband Trout. It’s also the ancestral home of the Winnemem Wintu tribe, whose population is approximately 150 people. The tribe is also opposed to increasing the dam height. If the dam were raised it would further flood more than 40 cultural sites, according to the tribe.
    [Show full text]
  • Mccloud Area Recreation Guide
    McCloud Area Recreation Guide McCloud Ranger Station - Shasta-Trinity National Forest ?*s,PVEgì This guide provides a brief overview of recreation facilities River route and opportunities available in the McCloud area of the The McCloud River parallels Shasta-Trinity National Forest. Whether you are planning Highway 89 from its source near Dead Horse Summit to to go camping, fishing, hiking, boating, picnicking, Fowler’s Campground. There it turns south and continues snowmobiling, cross country skiing or sight seeing, the through private property to McCloud Reservoir (It is choices for recreation are almost unlimited. suggested that kayakers not venture onto private land, even Recreation plus for breaks). At McCloud Reservoir, the river again flows through National Forest lands to a point several miles During the late spring, summer and early fall, the McCloud below Ah-Di-Na Campground, plus several other areas River is the most popular attraction in this area, offering downstream to the McCloud Nature Preserve. From here, fishing, swimming, camping and spectacular scenery. the river passes through mostly private property and public During the winter months, snowmobiling, cross country access is extremely limited until the river enters Shasta skiing and downhill skiing are the top ranking activities. Lake. Developed campgrounds & Dispersed camping facilities If the improved campgrounds around McCloud are too Except for Harris Spring, Cattle Camp, Trout Creek crowded and confining, you may want to try camping Campgrounds and McCloud Reservoir Boat Ramp, all somewhere else. Unless posted otherwise, you may camp developed campgrounds and day use facilities are located anywhere within the National Forests. A stay limit of 30 - along the McCloud River.
    [Show full text]
  • AH-DI-NA: a Short History Mccloud Ranger Station - Shasta-Trinity National Forest ?Ñc,*V
    AH-DI-NA: A Short History McCloud Ranger Station - Shasta-Trinity National Forest ?ñc,*V Ah-Di-Na has a long and rich history. What the visitor sees today are the remains of an Indian settlement and historic homestead once owned by the William Randolph Hearst family. This land was acquired by the Forest Service in 1965. The Name The Reservoirs No one knows where the name Ah-Di-Na came from. Some Speculation as to what these were used for ranges from say it is an Indian name, though the McCloud Wintu deny irrigation and fire storage to trout ponds and fishing pools. this, calling Ah-Di-Na “Piuti Witomas.” The name first appears on a 1936 Shasta National Forest map when the The Fitzhugh's Hearst's owned the property. Ah-Di-Na was purchased (“Save one The Indians phonograph and Stone records, two saddle chimney Many tribes claimed Ah-Di-Na as part of their tribal territory. built after These include the McCloud River Wintu, the Okwanuchu and horses and bridles.”) 1917 the Pit River Indians. Further archaeological research is by William M. needed to study the surface and subsurface remains of this Fitzhugh, also of San settlement. Francisco in 1919. Fitzhugh built a log The Whittier’s cabin but the logs They were the first owners of Ah-Di-Na, purchasing the land were not well cured from the Central Pacific Railroad in 1896. The Whittier’s, a and within the first years they began to crack. A stone wealthy family from San Francisco, had the foresight to begin chimney and the outlines of a basement room are the only Ah-Di-Na’s development as a sportsman's paradise for things remaining of the cabin.
    [Show full text]
  • Baldfaced Hornet & Aerial Yellowjacket
    Colorado Insect of Interest Baldfaced Hornet & Aerial Yellowjacket Scientific Names: Dolichovespula maculata (L.) (baldfaced hornet), D. arenaria (Fabricius) (aerial yellowjacket) Figure 1. Baldfaced hornet collecting honeydew from oak galls. Order: Hymenoptera (Bees, Wasps, Ants, Sawflies and Relatives) Family: Vespidae Identification and Descriptive Features: Adults are prominently marked with either black and white (baldfaced hornet) or black and yellow (aerial yellowjacket) markings. The general body form is elongate with the hind end terminating in a blunt point (with stinger) and they are only sparsely hairy, unlike bees. The baldfaced hornet is the larger species, typically over 15 mm in length. Size range within a colony varies with workers being smaller, usually within the range of 10-14 mm. Adults of the aerial yellowjacket are quite similar Figure 2. Aerial yellowjacket chewing on to the western yellowjacket, Vespula pensylvanica weathered wood. (Saussure), in both size and general coloration. The pattern of markings on the abdomen can be used to separate these insects (Figures 6-9). Distribution in Colorado: Both the baldfaced hornet and aerial yellowjacket normally nests in trees or large shrubs and are native to forested areas. However, with landscaping provided around residential areas these wasps may now commonly be found in most towns and cities, with the exception of some in the eastern plain communities. The aerial yellowjacket, in particular, has also adapted to nest on buildings. Life History and Habits: The baldfaced hornet and aerial yellowjacket, the two primary representatives of the genus Dolichovespula in Colorado, make large above ground carton nests of a papery material. These nests are produced annually, initiated in spring by a single overwintered queen and abandoned at the end of the season.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlling Wasps, Bees and Hornets Around Your Home  Dr
    Bringing information and education into the communities of the Granite State Controlling Wasps, Bees and Hornets Around Your Home Dr. Alan T. Eaton, Extension Specialist, Entomology Wasp encounters can be painful, even life-threatening, for a few highly sensitive people. Yet some New Hampshire species are not very aggressive and they also serve as valuable predators of soft-bodied insects. A hands-off policy might be better for some situations, while others might require careful, direct action. The choice you make should depend on the species and situation. Aggressive species New Hampshire is “blessed” with at least nine species of yellow- jackets, along with two other aggressive wasp species, the bald- faced hornet and giant European hornet. All these members of the wasp family Vespidae live in colonies and have similar life cycles. We also have a moderately aggressive, large solitary wasp, called the cicada killer. Most yellow jackets are about ½ inch long, with yellow and black banded bodies, and clear wings. Bald-faced hornets grow up to ¾ Yellow jacket wasp. Wasps and hornets are im- inch long, with stout, black bodies marked with gray or white bands. portant predators of soft-bodied insects, such Giant European hornets grow up to one inch long, resembling giant as caterpillars. yellow jackets, with a stout body, but colored yellow, brown and black. Only the mated females of Vespidae species survive the winter. These females overwinter individually, usually in deep leaf litter in the woods. In the spring, those that survived emerge and search for a site to start a tiny nest. Bald faced hornets prefer eaves of buildings, horizontal branches, or some similar site protected from rain.
    [Show full text]