API Management Pty Ltd 25 May 2011
Anketell Port Proposal
Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Assessment AECOM Anketell Port Proposal - Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Assessment
Anketell Port Proposal Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Assessment
Prepared for API Management Pty Ltd
Prepared by
AECOM Australia Pty Ltd 3 Forrest Place, Perth WA 6000, GPO Box B59, Perth WA 6849, Australia T +61 8 6430 2000 F +61 8 6430 2999 www.aecom.com ABN 20 093 846 925
25 May 2011
60213408
AECOM in Australia and New Zealand is certified to the latest version of ISO9001 and ISO14001.
© AECOM Australia Pty Ltd (AECOM). All rights reserved.
AECOM has prepared this document for the sole use of the Client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other party should rely on this document without the prior written consent of AECOM. AECOM undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document. This document has been prepared based on the Client’s description of its requirements and AECOM’s experience, having regard to assumptions that AECOM can reasonably be expected to make in accordance with sound professional principles. AECOM may also have relied upon information provided by the Client and other third parties to prepare this document, some of which may not have been verified. Subject to the above conditions, this document may be transmitted, reproduced or disseminated only in its entirety.
\\auper1fp001\environment\60213408 - API Flora Studies\8 Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60213408_REP_API_Ph2_FlVegPort_Rev0_20110525.docx Revision 0 - 25 May 2011
AECOM Anketell Port Proposal - Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Assessment
This page has been left blank intentionally.
\\auper1fp001\environment\60213408 - API Flora Studies\8 Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60213408_REP_API_Ph2_FlVegPort_Rev0_20110525.docx Revision 0 - 25 May 2011 AECOM Anketell Port Proposal - Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Assessment
Table of Contents Executive Summary i 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Location 1 1.3 Physical Environment 3 1.3.1 Climate 3 1.3.2 Soils 5 1.3.3 Land System Units 6 1.4 Biological Context 8 1.4.1 IBRA Regions 8 1.4.2 Flora and Vegetation 8 1.4.3 Vegetation Clearing, Extent and Status 10 1.5 Biological Factors of Environmental Significance 10 1.5.1 Declared Rare, Priority or Threatened Species 10 1.5.2 Threatened and Priority Ecological Communities 12 1.5.3 Local, Regional and National Significant Communities 13 1.5.4 Significant Species 13 1.6 Flora (Variants and Complexes) 14 2.0 Scope and Objectives 15 2.1 Phase 2, Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Assessment of the Original Port Development Area 15 2.2 Level 2 Flora and Vegetation of the Port Access Rail Realignment Area 15 2.3 Targeted Priority Flora Surveys 15 3.0 Methodology 17 3.1 Desktop Assessment 17 3.2 Field Assessment 17 3.2.1 Phase 2 Level 2 Flora and Vegetation assessment of the original Port Development Area 17 3.2.2 Level 2 Flora and Vegetation of the Port Access Rail Realignment Survey Area 19 3.2.3 Targeted Priority Flora Assessments 20 4.0 Survey Limitations 21 5.0 Results 23 5.1 Previous Assessments 23 5.2 Flora 24 5.2.1 Desktop Assessment 24 5.2.2 Field Assessment 25 5.2.3 Declared Rare, Priority and other Significant Flora 26 5.2.4 Introduced Species 29 5.3 Vegetation 32 5.3.1 Vegetation Communities 32 5.3.2 Vegetation Condition 36 5.3.3 Threatened and Priority Ecological Communities 36 5.3.4 Other Communities of Conservation Significance 37 6.0 Discussion 41 6.1 Flora 41 6.1.2 Declared Rare, Priority and Other Significant Flora 42 6.1.3 Introduced Species 44 6.2 Vegetation 45 6.2.1 Locally Significant Vegetation 46 6.2.2 Regionally Significant Vegetation 49 6.2.3 Threatened and Priority Ecological Communities 51 6.2.4 Other Communities of Significance 52 6.2.5 Vegetation Condition 52 7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations 53
\\auper1fp001\environment\60213408 - API Flora Studies\8 Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60213408_REP_API_Ph2_FlVegPort_Rev0_20110525.docx Revision 0 - 25 May 2011 AECOM Anketell Port Proposal - Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Assessment
8.0 List of Participants 55 9.0 Acknowledgements 55 10.0 References 57 Appendix A Summary of Vascular Flora Species recorded at each community within the Original Port and Port Access Rail Realignment Survey Areas A Appendix B Summary of Vascular Flora Species recorded at each quadrat within the Original Port and Port Access Rail Realignment Survey Areas B Appendix C Quadrat Data recorded from vegetation communities within the Original Port and the Port Access Rail-realignment Survey Areas C Appendix D Recommended Department of Agriculture and Food control measures for *Prosopis spp. D
List of Tables Table 1a Beard’s (1975) Terrestrial Vegetation Types within the original Port Development Area 8 Table 2 Definition of Rare and Priority Flora Species (Department of Environment and Conservation, 2011b) 11 Table 3 Categories of Threatened Flora Species (Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, 1999) 12 Table 4 Variants and Complexes from Collected Taxa 14 Table 5 Bushland Condition Ratings (adapted from Keighery, 1994 and the Braun-Blanquet Scale of Cover Abundance (from Mueller-Dombois and Ellenberg, 1974) 19 Table 6 Summary of Terrestrial flora and vegetation assessments conducted within the Anketell Point and Dixon Island Port Development Area 23 Table 7 Threatened and Priority Flora identified to potentially occur within the Anketell Point and Dixon Island Area (DEC, 2009) 24 Table 8 Acacia glaucocaesia (P3) populations recorded in the vicinity of the original Port Development Area (AECOM, 2009) 26 Table 9 Priority species and potential habitat identified in desktop assessments as having the potential to occur in the project areas 27 Table 10 Interim Summary of Vegetation Communities and Quadrats recording Introduced and Declared Plant Species (2010 and 2011) 30 Table 11 Vegetation Communities occurring within the original Port Development Area and the Port Rail Realignment Area 32 Table 12 Proportions of varying Vegetation Condition within the Project Area 36 Table 13 Community Reservation Priority Status for Beard Vegetation within the Chichester Subregions (Kendrick and Stanley, 2001 and Beeston et al., 2002) 39 Table 14 Community Reservation Priority Status for Beard Vegetation within the Roebourne Subregions (Kendrick and Stanley, 2001 and Beeston et al., 2002) 39 Table 15 Proportion of vegetation communities within Project Areas (i.e. original Port, Port Access Rail Realignment and Northern terminus of Rail Corridor) 47 Table 16 Proportion of Land System Units within the project area and the Chichester IBRA Region 50 Table 17 Proportion of Land System Units within the project area and the Roebourne IBRA Region 50 Table 18 Regionally significant Vegetation within the Chichester IBRA Region 51 Table 19 List of Participants 55
\\auper1fp001\environment\60213408 - API Flora Studies\8 Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60213408_REP_API_Ph2_FlVegPort_Rev0_20110525.docx Revision 0 - 25 May 2011 AECOM Anketell Port Proposal - Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Assessment
List of Figures Figure 1 Project Areas 2 Figure 2 Karratha Average Rainfall and 2009 Rainfall Data (Bureau of Meteorology, 2011a) 3 Figure 3 Karratha Average Rainfall and 2010 Rainfall Data (Bureau of Meteorology, 2011b) 4 Figure 4 Karratha Average Rainfall and 2010 Rainfall Data (Bureau of Meteorology, 2011c) 5 Figure 5 Land Systems 7 Figure 6 IBRA Regions 9 Figure 7 Priority Flora 28 Figure 8 Vegetation Communities and Condition 61
\\auper1fp001\environment\60213408 - API Flora Studies\8 Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60213408_REP_API_Ph2_FlVegPort_Rev0_20110525.docx Revision 0 - 25 May 2011 AECOM Anketell Port Proposal - Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Assessment
This page has been left blank intentionally.
\\auper1fp001\environment\60213408 - API Flora Studies\8 Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60213408_REP_API_Ph2_FlVegPort_Rev0_20110525.docx Revision 0 - 25 May 2011 AECOM Anketell Port Proposal - Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Assessment i
Executive Summary Australian Premium Iron Management Pty Ltd (API) is developing the West Pilbara Iron Ore Project (WPIOP) based on channel iron deposits (CID) at Mt Stuart and Red Hill, south of Pannawonica. At the feasibility stage, up to three potential port locations and therefore corresponding rail alignments were under investigation for the haulage and export of ore produced from the mine sites. Since 2008, AECOM have been undertaking flora and vegetation assessments of the various project sites and combinations of site for the project, to assist API with the environmental approvals process. This report presents the findings of the botanical component of environmental studies for the proposed Port Development Area at Anketell Point and on Dixon Island and the Port Access Rail Realignment Area. The field component of the various phases of the Level 2 flora and vegetation assessment was conducted by AECOM in May and July 2009, May 2010 and March and April 2011. It specifically deals with flora and vegetation communities, vegetation condition and potential floristic environmental constraints within the project areas. The poor rainfall during early 2010 contributed to poor survey conditions within the original Port Development Area. The wet season in 2010 did not provide sufficient rains to classify the weeks that followed as a “good season” from a floristic point of view (AECOM, 2010). For this reason the 2011 phase 2 flora and vegetation assessment was carried out to meet EPA Guidance requirements for comprehensive survey criteria. The phase 2 flora and vegetation assessment was carried out in March and April 2011, following the wet season during the optimum flowering period. Rainfall figures obtained from the Bureau of Meteorology indicate that December 2010, January and February 2011 all received higher than average rainfall (Figure 4). This would have provided sufficient rains to classify the weeks that follow as a good season from a floristic point of view. No species listed as DRF (T or X) under the Wildlife Conservation Act, 1950 or as Threatened under the EBPC Act, 1999 were recorded within the project area. Similarly no species listed as Priority Flora by the DEC were recorded. Additionally, no TECs were identified from field collected data within the original Port Development Area during the 2009, 2010 or 2011 flora and vegetation assessments. Similarly no TECs were identified to occur within the Port Access Rail Realignment area during 2011. In summary, the factors of environmental significance (constraints) with regards to flora and vegetation associated with the project area include: - One species collected, Isotoma aff. pusilla (AP 10-01) is most likely to be a new taxon and it is recommended that this species be recollected with the aim of collecting mature seeds to assist in further identification; - A Declared Plant (pest weed); *Prosopis pallida, listed by DAFWA has been recorded in the project area; - Two communities, Thg and AThg2, are considered to be locally significant due to supporting populations of Priority Flora; - A total of 15 vegetation communities, inclusive of vegetation community Hf, are considered to be regionally significant within the Chichester IBRA region, due to limited representation; and - One community, Hf, is regionally significant due to being equivalent to the Priority 3 Horseflat Land System of the Roebourne Plain PEC.
\\auper1fp001\environment\60213408 - API Flora Studies\8 Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60213408_REP_API_Ph2_FlVegPort_Rev0_20110525.docx Revision 0 - 25 May 2011 AECOM Anketell Port Proposal - Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Assessment ii
In response to the factors of significance recorded for the project area, the following measures are recommended to minimise impacts on these factors: - Limit clearing and placement of infrastructure to avoid areas of vegetation or vegetation supporting significant species (or with the potential to support significant species); - Utilise areas of vegetation determined to be in poorer condition for clearing and construction; and - Consider an appropriate revegetation program that may contribute to offsets for unavoidable impacts that could be implemented in cleared areas not required for infrastructure and in degraded areas also not utilised for the development.
\\auper1fp001\environment\60213408 - API Flora Studies\8 Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60213408_REP_API_Ph2_FlVegPort_Rev0_20110525.docx Revision 0 - 25 May 2011 AECOM Anketell Port Proposal - Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Assessment 1
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Background AECOM Australia Pty Ltd (AECOM) was commissioned by API to conduct an additional Phase 2 flora and vegetation assessment of the Anketell Point and Dixon Island Proposed Port Development Area, during April 2011. Numerous flora and vegetation assessments have been conducted between 2009 and 2011 at the port development site, and since 2008 for the rail corridor, associated with the development of API’s West Pilbara Iron Ore Project (WPIOP). This survey consisted of three components: - Phase 2, Level 2 Flora and Vegetation assessment of the original Port Development Area - Phase 1, Level 2 Flora and Vegetation assessment of the Port Access Rail Realignment Area; and - Targeted Priority Flora Surveys. This report presents the findings of the three flora and vegetation assessment components conducted during 2011 for the Anketell Point and Dixon Island Port Development Area (herein referred to as ‘Port Development Area’). For the purposes of this report, the collective project areas of the original Port Development Area and the Port Access Rail Realignment area are herein referred to as “the project area.” The areas that were surveyed, for example the original Port Development Area, Northern Terminus of Rail Corridor and Port Access Rail Realignment Areas are individually herein referred to as “survey areas”.
1.2 Location The Port Development Area is situated within the Shire of Roebourne, approximately 15 km directly east of Karratha and 1,5557 km north of Perth (Shire of Roebourne, 2011). The western most edge of the Port Development Area is approximately 1km west of Cleaverville Road and continues in an east north easterly direction for approximately 14 km (Figure 1). It spans the coast to Anketell Point and out to Dixon Island. The Port Access Rail Realignment Area is a section of proposed realignment of the original rail corridor linking iron ore resources and the proposed port location. The area of realignment that was assessed is directly adjacent to the western edge of the original rail alignment as presented within API’s Mine and Rail PER (API, 2010) and continues in a southerly direction towards North West Coastal Highway (Figure 1). .
\\auper1fp001\environment\60213408 - API Flora Studies\8 Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60213408_REP_API_Ph2_FlVegPort_Rev0_20110525.docx Revision 0 - 25 May 2011 Anketell Point and Dixon Island A P Port Project Area B P S !( !( Survey Area Locations D !( D I Figure 1 K ! 0 1 2 3 M !( K
1:90,000 (A4) C !( Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 50 LEGEND
A C ") !( ") Priority Flora ") Targeted Search Locations Original Port Survey Area R Port Access Rail ") Re-alignment Survey Area