DOCSLIB.ORG

Exploring Psalm 80 As a Source for Matthew 25: 31—46

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exploring Psalm 80 As a Source for Matthew 25: 31—46 Middlesex University Research Repository An open access repository of Middlesex University research http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk Venters, Chad (2018) Exploring Psalm 80 as a source for Matthew 25:31—46. PhD thesis, Middlesex University / London School of Theology. [Thesis] Final accepted version (with author’s formatting) This version is available at: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/25931/ Copyright: Middlesex University Research Repository makes the University’s research available electronically. Copyright and moral rights to this work are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners unless otherwise stated. The work is supplied on the understanding that any use for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. A copy may be downloaded for personal, non-commercial, research or study without prior permission and without charge. Works, including theses and research projects, may not be reproduced in any format or medium, or extensive quotations taken from them, or their content changed in any way, without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). They may not be sold or exploited commercially in any format or medium without the prior written permission of the copyright holder(s). Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author’s name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pag- ination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award. If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Middlesex University via the following email address: [email protected] The item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated. See also repository copyright: re-use policy: http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/policies.html#copy Exploring Psalm 80 as a Source for Matthew 25:31—46 A Thesis Submitted to Middlesex University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Chad Daniel Venters Middlesex University Supervised at London School of Theology July 2018 Abstract Chad Venters— ‘Exploring Psalm 80 as a Source for Matthew 25:31—46’ A Thesis for Doctor of Philosophy Middlesex University/London School of Theology, 2018 The Sheep and the Goats passage, in Matthew 25:31—46, is the climax of Jesus’ fifth great discourse. A tapestry of rich images and titles are woven into this scene of judgment, in which the ‘Son of Man’ is an enthroned shepherd and king who will judge πάντα τὰ ἔθνη, placing the sheep at the preeminent right and the goats in condemnation at the left. Such an eclectic series of images and titles presents an opportunity for exploring the background sources for this passage. This thesis argues that Psalm 80 (Psalm 79 LXX) is an important source for the composition of Matthew 25:31—46. Psalm 80 provides a religio—political background for understanding the devastation facing Judaism at the hands of the Romans. Viewing Psalm 80 as a source for Matthew 25:31—46 accounts for the diversity of images found in the Sheep and the Goats and provides further insight into the meaning of the passage. This reading of the Sheep and the Goats contends that the story is not focused on world—ending judgment. The text is describing a cataclysmic shift in which God’s vineyard has been taken from Israel and given to the church and the nations. This research augments the larger corpus of Matthean studies, contributing to the less— prominent research of Psalm 80 as an influential text for multiple passages in the New Testament and other first century literature. Various studies have proposed the prevalence of Psalm 80, through scriptural ‘echoes’ and ‘allusions’ in the New Testament. This research seeks to solidify these hypotheses in favour of Psalm 80 as an important background text for the New Testament Gospels. i Acknowledgements I cannot imagine where I would be without my remarkable parents, Dan and Pam Venters. What they have done for me over the past 37 years is beyond expression. I would not be the man I am today without them. Levi, you are the most important person in my life and I love you more than I can ever say. Kristin, you are my love and have filled my heart with so much happiness. Erin, I appreciate you always supporting me, encouraging me in my academic pursuits and for being a wonderful mommy. Dr. Julie Robb has been with me from the beginning of what probably feels like Homer’s Iliad for both of us. Her wisdom and insights have been invaluable to me in shaping the course of this thesis, and I can never thank her enough. Dr. Gempf also provided great insights into making the style and readability of the thesis much smoother. Dr. N.T. Wright and Dr. Atkinson provided me excellent feedback during the Viva to make this thesis much stronger and I am very appreciative. Dr. David Ernst is the man who years ago encouraged me to pursue PhD work, and was one of my readers. Dr. Peter Altmann was my other reader and offered me great insights as well. Both are true friends and colleagues. Kati Andreano from Multnomah Reno—Tahoe and Izumi Shibasaki from TMCC have been invaluable in helping me acquire sources. For a multitude of others who have influenced me in ways they will never realise, thank you for your contributions to the field I love. To those who paved the way in Psalm 80 studies, I am in your debt. Lastly, but truly never last, thank you Jesus for the hope and salvation I have in you. All that I do in this field I do for Your honour and glory. ii Abbreviations AC— Acta Theologica ANE— Ancient Near East AOTC— Abingdon Old Testament Commentary AUSS— Andrews University Seminary Studies BBR— Bulletin for Biblical Research BECNT— Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament BHS— Biblica Hebraica Stuttgartensia BJRL— Bulletin of the John Rylands Library BR— Biblical Research BSAC— Bibliotheca Sacra BSPADE— Bible and Spade CBC— Cambridge Bible Commentary CBQ— Central Bible Quarterly CDT— Cuadernos De Teologia CTSJ— Chafer Theological Seminary Journal DSD— Dead Sea Discoveries DUJ— Durham University Journal EKK— Evangelisch—Katholischer Kommentar GJCT— Global Journal of Classical Theology GTJ— Grace Theological Journal HAR— Hebrew Annual Review HTR— Harvard Theological Review ICC— International Critical Commentary IEJ— Israel Exploration Journal IJPCS— International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society IVP— InterVarsity Press JANES— Journal of the Ancient Near Eastern Society JBL— Journal of Biblical Literature JDT— Journal of Dispensational Theology JETS— Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society JGES— Journal of the Grace Evangelical Society JQR— Jewish Quarterly Review JSJSup— Journal for the Study of Judaism Supplements JSNT— Journal for the Study of the New Testament JSOT— Journal for the Study of the Old Testament JTS— Journal of Theological Studies MSJ— Master’s Seminary Journal NAC— New American Commentary NICNT— New International Commentary on the New Testament NICOT— New International Commentary on the Old Testament iii NJT— Nordic Journal of Theology NT— Novum Testamentum NTG— Novum Testamentum Graece NTS— New Testament Studies SCS— Septuagint Commentary Series PNTC— Pillar New Testament Commentary RQ— Restoration Quarterly RRR— Reformation and Renaissance Review SBL— Society of Biblical Literature SJT— Scottish Journal of Theology STR— Southeastern Theological Review StTh— Studia Theologica TB— Tyndale Bulletin ThStK— Theologische Studien und Kritiken TOTC— Tyndale Old Testament Commentary TS— Theological Studies TSR— Trinity Seminary Review UBS— United Bible Societies VC— Vigiliae Chrstianae VT— Vetus Testamentum WBC— Word Biblical Commentary WTJ— Westminster Theological Journal iv Table of Contents Chapter One— The Sheep and the Goats: Method, History of Research and Date of Text...1 Purpose of Research…1 Methodology...3 History of Research…10 Eighteenth Century Scholarship…10 Nineteenth Century Scholarship…11 Twentieth Century and Twenty First Century Scholarship…16 Date of Matthew…48 Pre—70 External Evidence…48 Pre—70 Internal Evidence…52 Post—70 External Evidence…61 Post—70 Internal Evidence…64 Chapter Two— Eschatology, Apocalypticism and the Son of Man…73 Eschatology and Apocalypticism…73 Daniel…76 The Similitudes of Enoch…80 4 Ezra…84 2 Baruch…86 Revelation…91 Defining the Apocalyptic and the Eschatological…95 World—Ending Eschatology and Cataclysmic Eschatology…101 The Son of Man…104 Daniel’s Son of Man…104 The Son of Man Beyond Daniel…112 Chapter Three— Psalm 80: Interpretation and Use as a Source... 120 Psalm 80’s Original Setting…120 v Israel Theory…121 Judah Theory…123 Pre—divided Monarchy Theory…123 Structure of Psalm 80…125 Interpretation of Psalm 80…127 The Messianic and Eschatological Development of Psalm 80…135 Psalm 79 (80) in the LXX…136 Psalm 80 in the Dead Sea Scrolls…139 Psalm 80 in 2 Baruch…142 Psalm 80 in the Liber Antiquitatum Biblicarum…148 Psalm 80 in the New Testament…155 Mark 14:62…157 The Parable of the Wicked Tenants…161 John 15:1—8…165 Chapter Four—The Textual Relationship of Psalm 80 and Matthew 25:31—46...170 Other Source Candidates for Matthew 25:31—46…170 Zechariah 14…170 Ezekiel 34…174 Similitudes of Enoch 62…179 Classifying Matthew 25:31—46…183 Literary Influence of Psalm 79 LXX on the Imagery of Matthew 25:31—46…185 Textual Relationship…189 The Titles of Christ…198 National Crisis and Covenant…204 The Problem with the Sheep…208 Chapter Five— A New Vineyard and New Sheep…214 The Road
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ezekiel 15.Pdf
    The Vine Ezekiel 15 The Vine Introduction • For a few years I experimented with growing Concord grapes in our backyard. • It was a complete failure. The Vine Introduction • I cut down the vine, let it dry out and eventually burned it. • To be fair to the grapevine, it probably needed a bigger yard and more effort than I was able to give to it. The Vine Introduction • We shouldn’t blame the vine in this case. • The vine or vineyard is a theme that runs through much of the Bible. The Vine Introduction • Read Isaiah 5:1-7. The Vine Introduction • Read Isaiah 5:1-7. • The problem with the nation was its fruit – or its lack of good fruit, to be precise. • Ezekiel will elaborate on this theme. The Vine Ezekiel 15 The Vine Ezekiel 15 • The downfall of the nation began in the days of Isaiah. • It was completed in the days of Ezekiel. The Vine Ezekiel 15 • A vine that bears no fruit – or bad fruit – is truly worthless. • As Ezekiel points out, it’s wood isn’t really useful for anything except to burn. The Vine Ezekiel 15 • God appointed Israel to be a blessing to the nations. • Instead they were unfaithful and bore bad fruit. • Then the vine was burned and its wood became even more useless than it was at the beginning. The Vine Ezekiel 15 This situation is mentioned because of what actually happened to Jerusalem. The city was charred (partially burned) by the fire of the Babylonians in 597 BC, but survived.
    [Show full text]
  • Rejection Imagery in the Synoptic Parables*
    Bibliotheca Sacra 153 (July-September 1996) 308-31. Pt. 2 of 2 Copyright © 1996 by Dallas Theological Seminary. Cited with permission. REJECTION IMAGERY IN THE SYNOPTIC PARABLES* Karl E. Pagenkemper The first article in this two-part series looked at im- agery from Jesus' parables in the Synoptic Gospels that point to an eschatological rejection (thus the so-called "rejection" motif). Seven elements of imagery were examined: (1) "the furnace of fire," (2) the phrase "weeping and gnashing of teeth," (3) the im- agery of "outer darkness," (4) the motif of the shut door, (5) the phrase "I do not know you" (and its variations), (6) the verb dixo- tome<w, and (7) the nature of the rejection for those servants who did not invest their talents or minas. In each case the rejection signi- fied not simply a rejection from some of the privileges of the kingdom, but rather a complete rejection from the coming escha- tological kingdom. The ones rejected did not have any connec- tion with the salvation Jesus offered. This article discusses the criteria on which the eschatological judgments themselves are made. That is, what criteria did the master or king in each of these parables employ to determine ul- timate (i.e., eschatological) rejection or acceptance? TWO KEY PARABLES IN MATTHEW 13 The point of the parables of the Wheat and Tares and of the Dragnet in Matthew 13 is to teach about the nature of the kingdom of heaven and its mysteries). An issue these parables address is Karl E. Pagenkemper is Associate Professor of New Testament Studies, Interna- tional School of Theology, Arrowhead Springs, California.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sheep and the Goats
    The Sheep and the Goats What do Christians believe about ‘eschatology’? To do... In this passage from Matthew’s Gospel, Jesus uses imagery which would have As you read, been familiar to people in Israel at the time when he lived, of a shepherd dividing highlight what his animals into diff erent types. This passage is about what Christians call the passage ‘eschatology’, beliefs about the last days of the world. (‘Eschaton’ means about says will be the last things in ancient Greek.) Like most early Christians, Matthew was sure done by that the end of the world was very close. people who are righteous In this passage, it is Jesus who is speaking. (on the right) To do... and by the Who do others (on the “When the Son of Man comes as King and all the angels people need left), using a with him, he will sit on his royal throne, and the people to help others diff erent colour of all the nations will be gathered before him. Then he in order to for each. will divide them into two groups, just as a shepherd be called separates the sheep from the goats. He will put the ‘righteous’? righteous people on his right and the others on his left. Jesus often Then the King will say to the people on his right, ‘Come, referred to you that are blessed by my Father! Come and possess himself as ‘the the kingdom which has been prepared for you ever since Son of Man’. the creation of the world. I was hungry and you fed me, thirsty and you gave me a drink; I was a stranger and you received me in your homes, naked and you clothed ‘Righteous’ me; I was sick and you took care of me, in prison and means behaving you visited me.’ The righteous will then answer him, in a pure, fair and ‘When, Lord, did we ever see you hungry and feed you, or just way.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prophets Speak on Forced Migration
    THE PROPHETS SPEAK ON FORCED MIGRATION Press SBL A ncient Israel and Its Literature Thomas C. Römer, General Editor Editorial Board: Mark G. Brett Marc Brettler Cynthia Edenburg Konrad Schmid Gale A. Yee Press SBLNum ber 21 THE PROPHETS SPEAK ON FORCED MIGRATION Edited by Mark J. Boda, Frank Ritchel Ames, John Ahn, and Mark Leuchter Press SBL Press SBLAt lanta C opyright © 2015 by SBL Press A ll rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by means of any information storage or retrieval system, except as may be expressly permit- ted by the 1976 Copyright Act or in writing from the publisher. Requests for permission should be addressed in writing to the Rights and Permissions Office,S BL Press, 825 Hous- ton Mill Road, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The prophets speak on forced migration / edited by Mark J. Boda, Frank Ritchel Ames, John Ahn, and Mark Leuchter. p. cm. — (Society of Biblical Literature : Ancient Israel and its literature ; 21) Includes bibliographical references and index. Summary: “In this collection of essays dealing with the prophetic material in the Hebrew Bible, scholars explore the motifs, effects, and role of forced migration on prophetic literature. Students and scholars interested in current, thorough approaches to the issues and problems associated with the study of geographical displacement, social identity ethics, trauma studies, theological diversification, hermeneutical strat- egies in relation to the memory, and the effects of various exilic conditions will find a valuable resource with productive avenues for inquiry”— Provided by publisher ISBN 978-1-62837-051-5 (paper binding : alk.
    [Show full text]
  • Ezekiel Chapters 4-24, God Warns People -Prophetic Messages -Symbolic Acts
    Ezekiel Chapters 4-24, God warns people -prophetic messages -symbolic acts Initial warnings Chapters 4-7, Ezekiel dramatizes the coming siege and destruction of Jerusalem -chapter 4 dramatizes the siege -chapter 5 dramatizes the dispersion -chapter 6-7 says that human effort will not prevent the destruction DATES: June 597 Jehoiachin taken captive in the second captivity July 5 593 Ezekiel 1:1 September 17 592 Ezekiel 8:1 August 14 591 Ezekiel 20:1 January 15 588 Ezekiel 24:1 January 15 588 Beginning of the second siege (2 Kings 25:1) Ezekiel 26:1- 32:17 seven more messages July 18 586 Fall of Jerusalem January 8 585 Ezekiel 33:21 April 28 573 Ezekiel 40:1, the Millennial vision Chapters 4-11 · Ezekiel demonstrated the fact of the siege with the tablet and model city, the rationed food, laying on his side and shaving his hair. · He explained the reason for the siege. · He has now been given an other vision showing why judgment was necessary. Chapter 12 · The people can not understand. Their theology and understanding of God is so confused they can not make sense or believe Ezekiel’s words. · Ezekiel gives two more dramas to demonstrate. God says “They have eyes to see but do not see and ears to hear but do not hear, for they are a rebellious people.” (12:1) · The first drama is to dig through the wall of his house like an exile. (12:4) · The second drama is to eat food and shudder with fear (12:17) Ezekiel follows the two dramas with five messages: · 12:21-25– Message One– False Doctrinal statement “The days go by and every vision comes to nothing.” · 12:26-28– Message Two– False Doctrinal statement “The vision he sees is for many years from now.” · 13—Message Three– Foolish prophets condemned · 14:1-11—Message Four—Idolatrous Elders condemned · 14:12-23—Message Five—No one can save or intercede for Israel now Ezekiel 15-17 · Three proverbs · The useless vine · The adulterous wife · The great eagle A new series of messages that follow the second vision 12:1 A new series of messages.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Note on Revelation 12:1 and 17:3-6
    Modified 02/16/10 A Brief Note on Revelation 12:1 and 17:3-6 Copyright (c) 2010 by Frank W. Hardy, Ph.D. Within the literary model adopted by C. Mervyn Maxwell in God Cares , vol. 2, the book of Revelation divides into two parts and within these each main section has a counterpart in the other half of the book. Responsible exegesis demands that in any given case the two sections be studied together. 1 One such pair of sections involves chaps. 12 and 17. It is important that we compare these two chapters, not only because of the overall structure of Revelation, but because they are linked by a very clear example of parallel symbolism. In Rev 12 and again in Rev 17 John sees a woman. A woman is commonly used as a symbol for God's people, or in this case the church. 2 The one woman, described in Rev 12:1, is pure: A great and wondrous sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet and a crown of twelve stars on her head. (Rev 12:1) The other woman, described in Rev 17:3-6a, is corrupt: (3) Then the angel carried me away in the Spirit into a desert. There I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast that was covered with blasphemous names and had seven heads and ten horns. (4) The woman was dressed in purple and scarlet, and was glittering with gold, precious stones and pearls. She held a golden cup in her hand, filled with abominable things and the filth of her adulteries.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson Booklet
    Our God is YHWH A Study of Ezekiel’s Prophecy Trinity Bible Church Sunday School Fall 2019 Our God is YHWH A Study of Ezekiel’s Prophecy Now it came about in the thirtieth year, on the fifth day of the fourth month, while I was by the river Chebar among the exiles, the heavens were opened and I saw visions of God. Ezekiel 1:1 Trinity Bible Church Sunday School Fall, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Visions of God – An introduction to the study of Ezekiel . 3 Outline . 6 Schedule . 7 Memory Assignments. 8 Ezekiel 18:4; 33:11; 34:23-26; 36:24-27 Hymn . 9 “Before the Throne of God Above” Lesson 1: Visions of God. 10 Ezekiel 1-3 2: A Clay Tablet and a Barber’s Razor . 12 Ezekiel 4-5 3: Payday for Sin . 14 Ezekiel 6-7 4: Fury Without Pity! . 16 Ezekiel 8-9 5: Righteous Wrath and Sovereign Grace . 18 Ezekiel 10-11 6: Rebellion and Nonsense . 20 Ezekiel 12-14 7: Like Mother, Like Daughter! . 22 Ezekiel 15-17 8: The Soul Who Sins Shall Die! . 24 Ezekiel 18-20 9: A Drawn Sword, a Bloody City, and Two Harlots. 26 Ezekiel 21-23 10: The Siege Begins. 28 Ezekiel 24-26 11: A Lamentation for Tyre and the King of Tyre . 30 Ezekiel 27-28 12: The Monster in the Nile. 32 Ezekiel 29-30 13: The Lesson from Assyria. 34 Ezekiel 31-32 14: The Fall of Jerusalem . 36 Ezekiel 33-34 15: A Nation Regenerated. 38 Ezekiel 35-37 16: The Last Battle .
    [Show full text]
  • Hell: Never, Forever, Or Just for Awhile?
    TMSJ 9/2 (Fall 1998) 129-145 HELL: NEVER, FOREVER, OR JUST FOR AWHILE? Richard L. Mayhue Senior Vice President and Dean Professor of Theology and Pastoral Ministries The plethora of literature produced in the last two decades on the basic nature of hell indicates a growing debate in evangelicalism that has not been experienced since the latter half of the nineteenth century. This introductory article to the entire theme issue of TMSJ sets forth the context of the question of whether hell involves conscious torment forever in Gehenna for unbelievers or their annihilation after the final judgment. It discusses historical, philosophical, lexical, contextual, and theological issues that prove crucial to reaching a definitive biblical conclusion. In the end, hell is a conscious, personal torment forever; it is not “just for awhile” before annihilation after the final judgment (conditional immortality) nor is its final retribution “never” (universalism). * * * * * A few noted evangelicals such as Clark Pinnock,1 John Stott,2 and John Wenham3 have in recent years challenged the doctrine of eternal torment forever in hell as God’s final judgment on all unbelievers. James Hunter, in his landmark “sociological interpretation” of evangelicalism, notes that “. it is clear that there is a measurable degree of uneasiness within this generation of Evangelicals with the notion of an eternal damnation.”4 The 1989 evangelical doctrinal caucus “Evangelical Affirmations” surprisingly debated this issue. “Strong disagreements did surface over the position of annihilationism, a view that holds that unsaved souls 1Clark H. Pinnock, “The Conditional View,” in Four Views on Hell, ed. by William Crockett (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1996) 135-66.
    [Show full text]
  • A Commentary on the Book of Ezekiel by Pastor Galen L
    A Commentary on the Book of Ezekiel By Pastor Galen L. Doughty Southside Christian Church December 2014 INTRODUCTION: This commentary is based upon my personal devotional notes and reflections on the Book of Ezekiel. It is intended to help you better understand some of the background and issues in Ezekiel’s prophecy. It is not a technical commentary designed for academic projects. This material is intended for use by members and friends of Southside Christian Church, especially our Life Group leaders to help you lead your group in a verse by verse study of Ezekiel. However, I do not include discussion questions in the commentary. That I leave up to you as a group leader. In the commentary there are occasional references to the original Hebrew words Ezekiel used in a particular passage. Those Hebrew words are always quoted in italics and are transliterated into English from the Hebrew. I go chapter by chapter in the commentary and sometimes individual verses are commented upon, sometimes it is several sentences and sometimes a whole paragraph. This commentary is based on the New International Version and all Scripture quotations are taken from that version of the Bible. Books of the Bible, Scripture references and quotes are also italicized. KEY HISTORICAL DATES IN THE TIMELINE OF EZEKIEL: King Jehoiachim of Judah becomes a Babylonian vassal, 605. Jehoiachim rebels against Nebuchadnezzar; he sends troops to raid and punish Jehoiachim, 602. Nebuchadnezzar deports some Jews to Babylon from Jerusalem including a young man named Daniel, 602. Jehoiachim dies and is replaced by his son Jehoiachin; he reigns three months, 598.
    [Show full text]
  • E Z E K I E L
    E Z E K I E L —prophet to the exiles in Babylon, early sixth century. Name means “God will strengthen” 1. Date Ezekiel dates his prophecies very frequently, as much or more than any other OT book. There are 14 chronological notices in Ezekiel: 1:1 30th year (of what?) 1:2 5th year of Jehoiachin’s captivity 8:1 6th “ 20:1 7th 24:1 9th 26:1 11th 29:1 10th 29:17 27th 30:20 11th 31:1 11th 32:1 12th 32:17 12th 33:21 12th year of our captivity 40:1 25th “ Jehoiachin’s captivity started in 597 BC; thus these references would span the following: 5th year = 593 BC 27th year = 571 BC Note that many of these prophecies were given during his 11th and 12th years of captivity. That would be 587-586 BC, just during and after the fall and destruction of Jerusalem (cf. 33:21). Ezekiel 1:1 poses a question: the 30th year of what? It could be the 30th year of the Neo-Babylonian empire (about 596 BC, assuming its beginnings under Nabopolassar in 626 BC), the year after Jehoiachin was taken captive, two years before Ezekiel’s call related in chapter 1. Another possibility is that it is Ezekiel’s age at the time of his call (cf. Num. 4:3, and the lives of John the Baptist and of Jesus, Lk. 3:23). The old critical view of C. C. Torrey, Pseudo-Ezekiel and the Original Prophecy (1930), is now generally discarded. Torrey and others denied that Nebuchadnezzar ever did destroy Jerusalem and Judah.
    [Show full text]
  • Ezekiel 15-16 11/23/14 Ezekiel 15
    1 Ted Kirnbauer Ezekiel 15-16 11/23/14 Ezekiel 15 15:1 Then the word of the LORD came to me, saying, 15:2 "Son of man, how is the wood of the vine better than any wood of a branch which is among the trees of the forest? 15:3 "Can wood be taken from it to make anything, or can men take a peg from it on which to hang any vessel? 15:4 "If it has been put into the fire for fuel, and the fire has consumed both of its ends and its middle part has been charred, is it then useful for anything? 15:5 "Behold, while it is intact, it is not made into anything. How much less, when the fire has consumed it and it is charred, can it still be made into anything! 15:6 "Therefore, thus says the Lord GOD, 'As the wood of the vine among the trees of the forest, which I have given to the fire for fuel, so have I given up the inhabitants of Jerusalem; 15:7 and I set My face against them. Though they have come out of the fire, yet the fire will consume them. Then you will know that I am the LORD, when I set My face against them. 15:8 'Thus I will make the land desolate, because they have acted unfaithfully,'" declares the Lord GOD. Chapter 15 can be divided into two sections: 1. the illustration (15:1-5) 2. the interpretation of the illustration (15:6-8) In the Old Testament, the nation of Israel was often likened to a vine or vineyard.
    [Show full text]
  • DANIEL Introduction — Page 1
    Daniel Christopher K. Lensch, S.T.M. Western Reformed Seminary (www.wrs.edu) INTRODUCTION to DANIEL I. Purposes A. Why study Daniel? 1. To enlarge our knowledge of sacred history in understanding the way God’s plan for His people has unfolded. Daniel reveals God’s hand of providence in delivering His people during and after the promised judgment of exile. 2. To enlarge our knowledge of the workings and out-workings of prophecy. Much emphasis is given to the relatively short-term predictions regarding the intertestamental period, and to the more apocalyptic predictions of the end of the age. 3. To learn lessons of faith for our personal Christian lives. B. Why did Daniel write? Directed to the nations as well as to his own people, Daniel’s message was to reaffirm God’s sovereignty, not only in His people’s affairs, but especially over the false gods of the conquering nations. C. Theological emphases (per Archer in EBC) 1. The Sovereignty of Yaweh, God of Israel, especially displayed in His governing the affairs of kings and through the miracles associated with this period. 2. The committed faith of God’s people, especially displayed in their unstinting self-denial for God’s cause and in their prayer life. 3. Redemption, immediate and also as seen in the long run. 4. God’s grace towards His people, despite their judgment for rebellion. II. Authorship and Date A. Daniel the man (phps. 620-530; his ministry and prophecy span the 70 year length of the captivity) DANIEL Introduction — page 1 B.
    [Show full text]