Influence of Plant and Soil Chemistry on Food Selection, Ranging Patterns, and Biomass of Colobus Guereza in Kakamega Forest, Ke

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Influence of Plant and Soil Chemistry on Food Selection, Ranging Patterns, and Biomass of Colobus Guereza in Kakamega Forest, Ke International Journal of Primatology, Vol. 28, No. 3, June 2007 (C 2007) DOI: 10.1007/s10764-006-9096-2 Influence of Plant and Soil Chemistry on Food Selection, Ranging Patterns, and Biomass of Colobus guereza in Kakamega Forest, Kenya Peter J. Fashing,1,2,3,7 Ellen S. Dierenfeld,4,5 and Christopher B. Mowry6 Received February 22, 2006; accepted May 26, 2006; Published Online May 24, 2007 Nutritional factors are among the most important influences on primate food choice. We examined the influence of macronutrients, minerals, and sec- ondary compounds on leaf choices by members of a foli-frugivorous popula- tion of eastern black-and-white colobus—or guerezas (Colobus guereza)— inhabiting the Kakamega Forest, Kenya. Macronutrients exerted a complex influence on guereza leaf choice at Kakamega. At a broad level, protein con- tent was the primary factor determining whether or not guerezas consumed specific leaf items, with eaten leaves at or above a protein threshold of ca. 14% dry matter. However, a finer grade analysis considering the selection ra- tios of only items eaten revealed that fiber played a much greater role than protein in influencing the rates at which different items were eaten relative to their abundance in the forest. Most minerals did not appear to influence leaf choice, though guerezas did exhibit strong selectivity for leaves rich in zinc. Guerezas avoided most leaves high in secondary compounds, though their top food item (Prunus africana mature leaves) contained some of the high- est condensed tannin concentrations of any leaves in their diet. Kakamega 1Department of Science and Conservation, Pittsburgh Zoo and PPG Aquarium, One Wild Place, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15206. 2Department of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15206. 3Department of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15206. 4Department of Nutrition, Saint Louis Zoo, One Government Drive, St. Louis, Missouri 63110. 5Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, 1200 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, New York 10027. 6Department of Biology, Berry College, Mt. Berry, Georgia 30149. 7To whom correspondence should be addressed; e-mail: [email protected]. 673 0164-0291/07/0600-0673/0 C 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 674 Fashing, Dierenfeld, and Mowry guerezas periodically traveled great distances to exploit rare foods (bark from exotic Myrtaceae trees and soil) outside their normal home ranges. Our re- sults suggest that these journeys were driven by the fact that these rare foods contained exceptionally high sodium concentrations, a mineral believed to be deficient in the guereza’s usual diet. Lastly, our results are consistent with the pattern established across other Paleotropical rain forests in which colobine biomass can be predicted by the protein-to-fiber ratio in mature leaves. Of the 8 rain forests for which the relevant data are available, Kakamega features the second highest mature leaf protein-to-fiber ratio as well as the second highest colobine biomass. KEY WORDS: colobines; macronutrients; minerals; protein-to-fiber ratio; secondary com- pounds. INTRODUCTION As eclectic omnivores typically occurring in species-rich tropical en- vironments, most primates must choose between a great many potential food items (Harding, 1981). These choices are influenced by a variety of ecological, morphological, and physiological factors including patterns of food abundance and distribution (Oates, 1987), intra- and inter-specific food competition (Janson, 1988; Waser, 1987), risk of predation (Miller, 2002), body size (Gaulin, 1979), gut morphology (Chivers, 1994; Milton, 1998), energetic requirements (Dasilva, 1992), macronutrient and mineral requirements (Silver et al., 2000; Yeager et al., 1997), and ability to cope with secondary compounds (Glander, 1982). Because food is essential to survival and reproduction, natural selection is expected to exert a strong influence on the food choices of animals, favoring either individuals that maximize their net intake rates of energy or those that optimize the mix of nutrients they consume while foraging (Pyke et al., 1977; Stephens and Krebs, 1986; Westoby, 1974). Indeed, empirical studies have demonstrated that disparities in food intake and foraging efficiency within groups of sev- eral primate taxa are associated with interindividual differences in repro- ductive success (Altmann, 1991; van Noordwijk and van Schaik, 1987, 1999; Whitten, 1983). The strong selective pressure on primate food choice sug- gests that patterns of food selection observed during studies of wild pri- mates are adaptive and can provide important insights into primate evolu- tionary ecology (Altmann, 1998; Milton, 1993). Nutritional factors are among the most powerful influences on food choice, posing several challenges that primates must overcome if they are to obtain suitable diets. First, few individual plant food items contain ade- quate concentrations of all the major essential nutrients (protein, fats, car- bohydrates, water, vitamins, and minerals), forcing most primates to forage Plant and Soil Chemistry Effects on Colobus guereza in Kakamega Forest 675 widely for a variety of food items from many species (Milton, 1993; Richard, 1985). Second, primates must take fiber content into account when selecting food items. Items with high concentrations of fibrous components (partic- ularly lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose) are difficult to digest and many primates avoid them (Milton, 1979; Rogers et al., 1990; Yeager et al., 1997). Third, primates, especially those feeding heavily on leaves or seeds, must cope with the fact that many plants produce secondary compounds intended to deter herbivores from consuming them (Freeland and Janzen, 1974; Glander, 1982). Many primates largely avoid these compounds, including tannins, which bind with proteins to reduce the digestibility of foods, and alkaloids, which act as toxins that disrupt metabolic processes, while other primates have evolved specialized digestive physiologies that allow them to consume some secondary compounds (Lambert, 1998). Because the tropi- cal forests where most primates live are so diverse and each potential food item has its own distinctive combination of essential nutrients, fiber, and secondary compounds, the effects of nutritional variables on food choice can be complex. Researchers have studied the influence of nutrition on food choice in primates most intensively in the Colobinae (Chapman et al., 2004; Davies et al., 1988; Kool, 1992; McKey et al., 1981; Mowry et al., 1996; Oates, 1980; Yeager et al., 1997). Colobines are primarily arboreal monkeys living in Africa and Asia that are characterized by a digestive physiology unique among the primates (Chivers, 1994; Oates and Davies, 1994). They possess an enlarged, sacculated forestomach containing large quantities of anaer- obic bacteria, protozoa, and fungi that ferment ingested food items (Kay and Davies, 1994). The capacity for microbial fermentation in the forestom- ach offers colobines unusually acute abilities to extract nutrients contained within the fibrous cell walls of plants and to detoxify some plant secondary compounds (Kay and Davies, 1994). Though originally believed to be an adaptation solely to the challenges of a leafy diet, forestomach fermenta- tion also allows colobines to exploit foods such as seeds that are also often rich in secondary compounds (Chivers, 1994). In fact, in recent decades, researchers have upended the traditional view of colobines as obligate leaf- eaters and it is now clear that many colobines are capable of expanding beyond the specialist folivore niche to consume large quantities of whole fruit, seeds, or lichen on a seasonal or even annual basis (Kirkpatrick, 1998; McKey, 1978;Starin,1991). Still, leaves make substantial contributions to the diets of nearly all colobines (Fashing, 2006; Kirkpatrick, 2006) and their fundamental importance to colobines is reflected in the robust link that has been established between the protein-to-fiber ratio in mature leaves and colobine biomass across forests in the Paleotropics (Waterman and Kool, 1994). 676 Fashing, Dierenfeld, and Mowry One colobine species known to exhibit considerable dietary flexibil- ity is the eastern black-and-white colobus or guereza (Colobus guereza). Guerezas subsist heavily on leaves at some sites (Kibale, Uganda: Chapman et al., 2004; Harris, 2005; Oates, 1977a; Ituri, D.R. Congo: Bocian, 1997) and on a more varied diet of leaves and whole fruits or seeds at others (Kakamega, Kenya: Fashing, 2001b; Dja, Cameroon: Poulsen et al., 2002; Budongo, Uganda: A. Plumptre, unpub. data). Researchers have studied the influence of nutritional factors on food choice among guerezas only at the sites where they are most folivorous (Kibale: Baranga, 1982, 1983; Chapman et al., 2002, 2003, 2004; Oates, 1978; Oates et al., 1977; Rode et al., 2003; Wasserman and Chapman, 2003; Ituri: Bocian, 1997). At these sites, levels of protein (Bocian, 1997; Chapman et al., 2004); fiber (Chapman et al., 2004); tannins (Oates et al., 1977); and several minerals including zinc, man- ganese, and sodium (Oates, 1978; Rode et al., 2003) in food items appear to affect food choice. Sodium content also appears to exert a powerful influ- ence on the ranging patterns of guerezas at Kibale, causing them to travel long distances intermittently to access sodium-rich swamp plants and Euca- lyptus sp. (Myrtaceae) trees believed to make up for sodium deficiencies
Recommended publications
  • The Role of Exposure in Conservation
    Behavioral Application in Wildlife Photography: Developing a Foundation in Ecological and Behavioral Characteristics of the Zanzibar Red Colobus Monkey (Procolobus kirkii) as it Applies to the Development Exhibition Photography Matthew Jorgensen April 29, 2009 SIT: Zanzibar – Coastal Ecology and Natural Resource Management Spring 2009 Advisor: Kim Howell – UDSM Academic Director: Helen Peeks Table of Contents Acknowledgements – 3 Abstract – 4 Introduction – 4-15 • 4 - The Role of Exposure in Conservation • 5 - The Zanzibar Red Colobus (Piliocolobus kirkii) as a Conservation Symbol • 6 - Colobine Physiology and Natural History • 8 - Colobine Behavior • 8 - Physical Display (Visual Communication) • 11 - Vocal Communication • 13 - Olfactory and Tactile Communication • 14 - The Importance of Behavioral Knowledge Study Area - 15 Methodology - 15 Results - 16 Discussion – 17-30 • 17 - Success of the Exhibition • 18 - Individual Image Assessment • 28 - Final Exhibition Assessment • 29 - Behavioral Foundation and Photography Conclusion - 30 Evaluation - 31 Bibliography - 32 Appendices - 33 2 To all those who helped me along the way, I am forever in your debt. To Helen Peeks and Said Hamad Omar for a semester of advice, and for trying to make my dreams possible (despite the insurmountable odds). Ali Ali Mwinyi, for making my planning at Jozani as simple as possible, I thank you. I would like to thank Bi Ashura, for getting me settled at Jozani and ensuring my comfort during studies. Finally, I am thankful to the rangers and staff of Jozani for welcoming me into the park, for their encouragement and support of my project. To Kim Howell, for agreeing to support a project outside his area of expertise, I am eternally grateful.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Appendix for “The Impact of the “World's 25 Most Endangered
    Online appendix for “The impact of the “World’s 25 Most Endangered Primates” list on scientific publications and media” Table A1. List of species included in the Top25 most endangered primate list from the list of 2000-2002 to 2010-2012 and used in the scientific publication analysis. There is the year of their first mention in the Top25 list and the consecutive mentions in the following Top25 lists. Species names are the current species names (based on IUCN) and not the name used at the time of the Top25 list release. First Second Third Fourth Fifth Sixth Species mention mention mention mention mention mention Ateles fusciceps 2006 Ateles hybridus 2006 2008 2010 Ateles hybridus brunneus 2004 Brachyteles hypoxanthus 2000 2002 2004 Callicebus barbarabrownae 2010 Cebus flavius 2010 Cebus xanthosternos 2000 2002 2004 Cercocebus atys lunulatus 2000 2002 2004 Cercocebus galeritus galeritus 2002 Cercocebus sanjei 2000 2002 2004 Cercopithecus roloway 2002 2006 2008 2010 Cercopithecus sclateri 2000 Eulemur cinereiceps 2004 2006 2008 Eulemur flavifrons 2008 2010 Galagoides rondoensis 2006 2008 2010 Gorilla beringei graueri 2010 Gorilla beringei beringei 2000 2002 2004 Gorilla gorilla diehli 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 Hapalemur aureus 2000 Hapalemur griseus alaotrensis 2000 Hoolock hoolock 2006 2008 Hylobates moloch 2000 Lagothrix flavicauda 2000 2006 2008 2010 Leontopithecus caissara 2000 2002 2004 Leontopithecus chrysopygus 2000 Leontopithecus rosalia 2000 Lepilemur sahamalazensis 2006 Lepilemur septentrionalis 2008 2010 Loris tardigradus nycticeboides
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEW ARTICLE Agroecosystems and Primate Conservation in the Tropics: a Review
    American Journal of Primatology 74:696–711 (2012) REVIEW ARTICLE Agroecosystems and Primate Conservation in The Tropics: A Review ∗ ALEJANDRO ESTRADA1 , BECKY E. RABOY2,3, AND LEONARDO C. OLIVEIRA3-6 1Estaci´on de Biolog´ıa Tropical Los Tuxtlas Instituto de Biolog´ıa, Universidad Nacional Aut´onoma de M´exico, Mexico City, Mexico 2Conservation Ecology Center, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, DC 3Instituto de Estudos S´ocioambientais do Sul da Bahia (IESB), Ilh´eus-BA, Brazil 4Programa de P´os-Gradua¸c˜ao em Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 5Programa de P´os-Gradua¸c˜ao em Ecologia e Conserva¸c˜ao da Biodiversidade, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilh´eus-BA, Brazil 6Bicho do Mato Instituto de Pesquisa, Belo Horizonte-MG, Brazil Agroecosystems cover more than one quarter of the global land area (ca. 50 million km2) as highly simplified (e.g. pasturelands) or more complex systems (e.g. polycultures and agroforestry systems) with the capacity to support higher biodiversity. Increasingly more information has been published about primates in agroecosystems but a general synthesis of the diversity of agroecosystems that primates use or which primate taxa are able to persist in these anthropogenic components of the landscapes is still lacking. Because of the continued extensive transformation of primate habitat into human-modified landscapes, it is important to explore the extent to which agroecosystems are used by primates. In this article, we reviewed published information on the use of agroecosystems by primates in habitat countries and also discuss the potential costs and benefits to human and nonhuman primates of primate use of agroecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • World's Most Endangered Primates
    Primates in Peril The World’s 25 Most Endangered Primates 2016–2018 Edited by Christoph Schwitzer, Russell A. Mittermeier, Anthony B. Rylands, Federica Chiozza, Elizabeth A. Williamson, Elizabeth J. Macfie, Janette Wallis and Alison Cotton Illustrations by Stephen D. Nash IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group (PSG) International Primatological Society (IPS) Conservation International (CI) Bristol Zoological Society (BZS) Published by: IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group (PSG), International Primatological Society (IPS), Conservation International (CI), Bristol Zoological Society (BZS) Copyright: ©2017 Conservation International All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the publisher. Inquiries to the publisher should be directed to the following address: Russell A. Mittermeier, Chair, IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group, Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202, USA. Citation (report): Schwitzer, C., Mittermeier, R.A., Rylands, A.B., Chiozza, F., Williamson, E.A., Macfie, E.J., Wallis, J. and Cotton, A. (eds.). 2017. Primates in Peril: The World’s 25 Most Endangered Primates 2016–2018. IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group (PSG), International Primatological Society (IPS), Conservation International (CI), and Bristol Zoological Society, Arlington, VA. 99 pp. Citation (species): Salmona, J., Patel, E.R., Chikhi, L. and Banks, M.A. 2017. Propithecus perrieri (Lavauden, 1931). In: C. Schwitzer, R.A. Mittermeier, A.B. Rylands, F. Chiozza, E.A. Williamson, E.J. Macfie, J. Wallis and A. Cotton (eds.), Primates in Peril: The World’s 25 Most Endangered Primates 2016–2018, pp. 40-43. IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group (PSG), International Primatological Society (IPS), Conservation International (CI), and Bristol Zoological Society, Arlington, VA.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Update: August 2002 Habitat Quality and Fragmentation and The
    Project Update: August 2002 Habitat Quality and Fragmentation and the Distribution and Abundance of the Tana River Red Colobus Monkey, Procolobus Rufomitratus, in Eastern Kenya Habitat fragmentation constitutes the most significant threat to survival of primates in the world and therefore there is an urgent need for effective conservation measures that protect primates living in fragmented habitats. Few studies have investigated what habitat factors determine the probability that primates will occur in habitat fragments or effectiveness of specific conservation measures established to protect them. I analysed forest habitat and colobus population attributes to determine factors that influenced occurrence and abundance of the critically endangered Tana River red colobus in forest fragments in Kenya. The probability of colobus inhabiting forests was positively related to amount of habitat edge and tree species composition. Most of the variance in the density of colobus monkeys was explained by: basal area of food trees, basal area per food tree, density of food trees, and basal area per tree for all trees. Therefore effective primate conservation in fragmented habitats may require strategies that consider different factors that influence both the occurrence of a species and its abundance. To determine whether the Tana River Primate National Reserve is effective in conserving the Tana River red colobus, and by extension other species, I determined whether colobus population attributes or forest habitat attributes differed between inside and outside the reserve. I found no difference in colobus density or mean group size between forests inside and outside the reserve. Forests outside the reserve had significantly higher total basal area of trees, mean basal area per tree, and total basal area of stumps left by trees cut for human use.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity, Above-Ground Biomass, and Vegetation Patterns in a Tropical Dry Forest in Kimbi-Fungom National Park, Cameroon
    Heliyon 6 (2020) e03290 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Heliyon journal homepage: www.cell.com/heliyon Research article Diversity, above-ground biomass, and vegetation patterns in a tropical dry forest in Kimbi-Fungom National Park, Cameroon Moses N. Sainge a,*, Felix Nchu b, A. Townsend Peterson c a Department of Environmental and Occupational Studies, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town 8000, South Africa b Department of Horticultural Sciences, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Bellville 7535, South Africa c Biodiversity Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 66045, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Research highlights: This study is one of few detailed analyses of plant diversity and vegetation patterns in African Ecological restoration dry forests. We established permanent plots to characterize plant diversity, above-ground biomass, and vegetation Flora patterns in a tropical dry forest in Kimbi-Fungom National Park, Cameroon. Our results contribute to long-term Environmental assessment monitoring, predictions, and management of dry forest ecosystems, which are often vulnerable to anthropogenic Environmental health pressures. Environmental impact assessment Dry forest Background and objectives: Considerable consensus exists regarding the importance of dry forests in species di- Bamenda highlands versity and carbon storage; however, the relationship between dry forest tree species composition, species rich- Kimbi-Fungom National Park ness, and carbon stock is not well established. Also, simple baseline data on plant diversity are scarce for many dry Carbon forest ecosystems. This study seeks to characterize floristic diversity, vegetation patterns, and tree diversity in Semi-deciduous permanent plots in a tropical dry forest in Northwestern Cameroon (Kimbi-Fungom National Park) for the first Tree composition time.
    [Show full text]
  • Olive Colobus (Procolobus Verus) Call Combinations and Ecological
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2013; 1 (6): 15-21 ISSN 2320-7078 Olive colobus (Procolobus verus) call combinations and JEZS 2013; 1 (6): 15-21 ecological parameters in Taï National Park, Côte d’Ivoire © 2013 AkiNik Publications Received 24-10-2013 Accepted: 07-11-2013 Jean-Claude Koffi BENE, Eloi Anderson BITTY, Kouame Antoine Jean-Claude Koffi BENE N’GUESSAN UFR Environnement, Université Jean Lorougnon Guédé; BP 150 Abstract Daloa Animal communication is any transfer of information on the part of one or more animals that has an Email: [email protected] effect on the current or future behavior of another animal. The ability to communicate effectively with other individuals plays a critical role in the lives of all animals and uses several signals. Eloi Anderson BITTY Acoustic communication is exceedingly abundant in nature, likely because sound can be adapted to a Centre Suisse de Recherches wide variety of environmental conditions and behavioral situations. Olive colobus monkeys produce Scientifiques en Côte d’Ivoire; 01 BP a finite number of acoustically distinct calls as part of a species-specific vocal repertoire. The call 1303 Abidjan 01 system of Olive colobus is structurally more complex because calls are assembled into higher-order Email: [email protected] level of sequences that carry specific meanings. Focal animal studies and Ad Libitum conducted in three groups of Olive colobus monkeys in Taï National Park indicate that some environmental and Kouame Antoine N’GUESSAN social parameters significantly affect the emission of different call combination types of this monkey Centre Suisse de Recherches species. Scientifiques en Côte d’Ivoire; 01 BP 1303 Abidjan 01 Email: [email protected] Keywords: Olive colobus, call combination, social parameter, environment parameter.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlled Alien Species -Common Name
    Controlled Alien Species –Common Name List of Controlled Alien Species Amphibians by Common Name -3 species- (Updated December 2009) Frogs Common Name Family Genus Species Poison Dart Frog, Black-Legged Dendrobatidae Phyllobates bicolor Poison Dart Frog, Golden Dendrobatidae Phyllobates terribilis Poison Dart Frog, Kokoe Dendrobatidae Phyllobates aurotaenia Page 1 of 50 Controlled Alien Species –Common Name List of Controlled Alien Species Birds by Common Name -3 species- (Updated December 2009) Birds Common Name Family Genus Species Cassowary, Dwarf Cassuariidae Casuarius bennetti Cassowary, Northern Cassuariidae Casuarius unappendiculatus Cassowary, Southern Cassuariidae Casuarius casuarius Page 2 of 50 Controlled Alien Species –Common Name List of Controlled Alien Species Mammals by Common Name -437 species- (Updated March 2010) Common Name Family Genus Species Artiodactyla (Even-toed Ungulates) Bovines Buffalo, African Bovidae Syncerus caffer Gaur Bovidae Bos frontalis Girrafe Giraffe Giraffidae Giraffa camelopardalis Hippopotami Hippopotamus Hippopotamidae Hippopotamus amphibious Hippopotamus, Madagascan Pygmy Hippopotamidae Hexaprotodon liberiensis Carnivora Canidae (Dog-like) Coyote, Jackals & Wolves Coyote (not native to BC) Canidae Canis latrans Dingo Canidae Canis lupus Jackal, Black-Backed Canidae Canis mesomelas Jackal, Golden Canidae Canis aureus Jackal Side-Striped Canidae Canis adustus Wolf, Gray (not native to BC) Canidae Canis lupus Wolf, Maned Canidae Chrysocyon rachyurus Wolf, Red Canidae Canis rufus Wolf, Ethiopian
    [Show full text]
  • Piliocolobus Semlikiensis, Semliki Red Colobus
    The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ ISSN 2307-8235 (online) IUCN 2020: T92657343A92657454 Scope(s): Global Language: English Piliocolobus semlikiensis, Semliki Red Colobus Assessment by: Maisels, F. & Ting, N. View on www.iucnredlist.org Citation: Maisels, F. & Ting, N. 2020. Piliocolobus semlikiensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T92657343A92657454. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020- 1.RLTS.T92657343A92657454.en Copyright: © 2020 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale, reposting or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holder. For further details see Terms of Use. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is produced and managed by the IUCN Global Species Programme, the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) and The IUCN Red List Partnership. The IUCN Red List Partners are: Arizona State University; BirdLife International; Botanic Gardens Conservation International; Conservation International; NatureServe; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sapienza University of Rome; Texas A&M University; and Zoological Society of London. If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown in this document, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ Taxonomy Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Animalia Chordata Mammalia Primates Cercopithecidae Scientific Name: Piliocolobus semlikiensis (Colyn, 1991) Synonym(s): • Colobus ellioti Dollman, 1909 • Colobus variabilis Lorenz von Liburnau, 1914 • Colobus badius ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • A Model of Colobus and Piliocolobus Behavioural Ecology: One Folivore
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Bournemouth University Research Online Korstjens & Dunbar Colobine model 1 2 Time constraints limit group sizes and distribution in red and black-and- 3 white colobus monkeys 4 5 6 Amanda H. Korstjens 7 R.I.M. Dunbar 8 9 10 British Academy Centenary Research Project 11 School of Biological Sciences 12 University of Liverpool 13 Crown St 14 Liverpool L69 7ZB 15 England 16 17 18 Email: [email protected] 19 20 21 22 23 Short title: Colobine model 24 Korstjens & Dunbar Colobine model 25 ABSTRACT 26 Several studies have shown that, in frugivorous primates, a major constraint on group size is 27 within-group feeding competition. This relationship is less obvious in folivorous primates. 28 We investigated whether colobine group sizes are constrained by time limitations as a result 29 of their low energy diet and ruminant-like digestive system. We used climate as an easy to 30 obtain proxy for the productivity of a habitat. Using the relationships between climate, group 31 size and time budget components observed for Colobus and Piliocolobus populations at 32 different research sites, we created two taxon-specific models. In both genera, feeding time 33 increased with group size (or biomass). The models for Colobus and Piliocolobus correctly 34 predicted the presence or absence of the genus at, respectively, 86% of 148 and 84% of 156 35 African primate sites. Median predicted group sizes where the respective genera were present 36 were 19 for Colobus and 53 for Piliocolobus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Habitat Disturbance on the Populations of Geoffroy's Spider Monkeys in the Yucatan Peninsula
    The Effects of Habitat Disturbance on the Populations of Geoffroy’s Spider Monkeys in the Yucatan Peninsula PhD thesis Denise Spaan Supervisor: Filippo Aureli Co-supervisor: Gabriel Ramos-Fernández August 2017 Instituto de Neuroetología Universidad Veracruzana 1 For the spider monkeys of the Yucatan Peninsula, and all those dedicated to their conservation. 2 Acknowledgements This thesis turned into the biggest project I have ever attempted and it could not have been completed without the invaluable help and support of countless people and organizations. A huge thank you goes out to my supervisors Drs. Filippo Aureli and Gabriel Ramos- Fernández. Thank you for your guidance, friendship and encouragement, I have learnt so much and truly enjoyed this experience. This thesis would not have been possible without you and I am extremely proud of the results. Additionally, I would like to thank Filippo Aureli for all his help in organizing the logistics of field work. Your constant help and dedication to this project has been inspiring, and kept me pushing forward even when it was not always easy to do so, so thank you very much. I would like to thank Dr. Martha Bonilla for offering me an amazing estancia at the INECOL. Your kind words have encouraged and inspired me throughout the past three years, and have especially helped me to get through the last few months. Thank you! A big thank you to Drs. Colleen Schaffner and Jorge Morales Mavil for all your feedback and ideas over the past three years. Colleen, thank you for helping me to feel at home in Mexico and for all your support! I very much look forward to continue working with all of you in the future! I would like to thank the CONACYT for my PhD scholarship and the Instituto de Neuroetología for logistical, administrative and financial support.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Variation in Diet and Nutrition of the Northern-Most Population of Rhinopithecus Roxellana
    Received: 29 January 2018 | Revised: 19 February 2018 | Accepted: 6 March 2018 DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22755 RESEARCH ARTICLE Seasonal variation in diet and nutrition of the northern-most population of Rhinopithecus roxellana Rong Hou1 | Shujun He1 | Fan Wu1 | Colin A. Chapman1,2,3,4 | Ruliang Pan1,5 | Paul A. Garber6 | Songtao Guo1 | Baoguo Li1,7 1 Shaanxi Key Laboratory for Animal Conservation, College of Life Sciences, There is a great deal of spatial and temporal variation in the availability and nutritional ’ Northwest University, Xi an, China quality of foods eaten by animals, particularly in temperate regions where winter brings 2 Department of Anthropology and McGill School of Environment, McGill University, lengthy periods of leaf and fruit scarcity. We analyzed the availability, dietary Montreal, Quebec, Canada composition, and macronutrients of the foods eaten by the northern-most golden 3 Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, New snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus roxellana) population in the Qinling Mountains, York China to understand food choice in a highly seasonal environment dominated by 4 Section of Social Systems Evolution, Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Kyoto, deciduous trees. During the warm months between April and November, leaves are Japan consumed in proportion to their availability, while during the leaf-scarce months 5 School of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology, The University of Western Australia, between December and March, bark and leaf/flower buds comprise most of their diet. Perth, Australia When leaves dominated their diet, golden snub-nosed monkeys preferentially selected 6 Department of Anthropology, University leaves with higher ratios of crude protein to acid detergent fiber.
    [Show full text]