Tuition Impact Analysis Report, FY 2009-10

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tuition Impact Analysis Report, FY 2009-10 FY 2009-10 Tuition Impact Analysis Report December 2009 Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education Oklahoma City, Oklahoma OKLAHOMA STATE REGENTS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION William Stuart Price, Chairman Tulsa Joseph L. Parker, Jr. Bill W. Burgess, Jr. Vice Chairman Lawton Tulsa Julie Carson Ronald H. White Secretary Oklahoma City Claremore Marlin “Ike” Glass, Jr. James D. “Jimmy” Harrel Assistant Secretary Leedey Newkirk John Massey Michael C. Turpen Durant Oklahoma City Glen D. Johnson Chancellor The Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education in compliance with Titles VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Executive Order 11246 as amended, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and other federal laws and regulations, do not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, religion, handicap or status as a veteran in any of its policies, practices, or procedures. This includes, but is not limited to, admissions, employment, financial aid, and educational services. This publication, printed by the State Regents’ central services, is issued by the Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education as authorized by 70 O.S. 2001, Section 3206. Two hundred copies have been printed at a cost of approximately $575. Copies have been deposited with the Publications Clearinghouse of the Oklahoma Department of Libraries. This publication was produced in December 2009. Disclaimer: The information provided in this document is intended to be current at the time of its publication. However, program policies and related state laws are subject to change. Contact the program for the most current information. Table of Contents Page Executive Summary.............................................................................................................1 Process for Approval of FY10 Tuition and Mandatory Fee Requests.................................6 Summary of FY10 Tuition and Mandatory Fee Increases...................................................8 FY10 Guaranteed Tuition Rates ........................................................................................10 What Portion of Costs Do Oklahoma Students Pay?.........................................................10 Process for Approval of Academic Services Fees .............................................................11 Analysis of Changes to Academic Services Fees ..............................................................12 Considerations in Setting Tuition and Fees .......................................................................12 Impact on Students’ Ability to Pay........................................................................13 Impact of Tuition Increases on Enrollment ...........................................................16 Availability of Financial Aid .................................................................................19 Implementation of Cost-Effective Measures .........................................................25 Communication with Students...............................................................................26 Justification for Increases in Excess of Nine Percent ............................................27 State Regents’ Initiatives ...................................................................................................27 The National Perspective ...................................................................................................29 Tuition and Mandatory Fees Nationally ................................................................29 National Availability of Financial Aid ..................................................................32 Grant Aid ...............................................................................................................33 Loans......................................................................................................................35 Other Forms of Student Aid...................................................................................36 FTE Enrollment .....................................................................................................36 Funding Pressures ..................................................................................................37 Consumer Price Index............................................................................................38 Higher Education Price Index................................................................................39 Higher Education Cost Adjustment .......................................................................39 Enrollment Projections...........................................................................................40 Higher Education Reauthorization Act..................................................................40 Commission on the Future of Higher Education ...................................................41 Community College Support .................................................................................42 Miscellaneous ........................................................................................................43 How America Pays for College .............................................................................45 Other Factors..........................................................................................................46 Is a College Education Still Worth the Investment?..........................................................48 Conclusions........................................................................................................................52 Attachments .......................................................................................................................55 1. FY10 Undergraduate Tuition and Fees—Big Twelve Universities.................57 2. Public Hearing Notice......................................................................................59 3. FY10 Legislative Peer Limits for Tuition and Mandatory Fees......................61 4. Tuition and Fee Approval Guidelines..............................................................63 5. Minutes and Transcript of April 29, 2009 Public Hearing ..............................65 6. Undergraduate Tuition and Mandatory Fees for FY10....................................71 7. Graduate Tuition and Mandatory Fees for FY10.............................................77 8. Professional Programs Tuition and Mandatory Fees for FY10 .......................81 9. Summary Listing of FY10 Average Tuition Increases by Tier .......................85 10. Comparison of FY10 Tuition and Mandatory Fees to Legislative Peer Limits ..............................................................................89 11. Guaranteed Tuition and Mandatory Fees for FY10.........................................93 12. Comparison of FY10 Guaranteed Tuition with Legislative Limits.................95 13. FY10 Average Tuition and Mandatory Fees Ranked by State ........................97 Appendix: Constitutional and Statutory Provisions for the Coordination of Higher Education Tuition and Fees ...................................................................................99 Executive Summary All Approved Tuition and Mandatory Fees are Within Legislative Limits. State Regents reviewed institutional tuition and mandatory fee requests for compliance and each institution’s requests were below the posted legislative peer limits for the tier as specified in Oklahoma Statutes (Title 70, O. S. 2004 Supp., Section 3218.8 -- see Attachment 10). Institutions implemented the Tuition Freeze Plan for FY10 and tuition at all institutions will remain at the same levels as in FY09. Mandatory fees at all institutions, with the exception of two community colleges, will also remain the same as in FY09 resulting in an overall average increase of less than one percent for undergraduate resident and nonresident tuition and mandatory fees. The average change in tuition and mandatory fees for FY10 by tier is reflected in the following table. Tier Undergraduate Graduate Resident Nonresident Resident Nonresident Research Universities 0.0% $0.00 0.0% $0.00 0.0% $0.00 0.0% $0.00 Regional Institutions 0.0% $0.0 0.0% $0.0 0.0% $0.0 0.0% $0.0 Community Colleges 0.8% $20.42 0.3% $20.42 n/a n/a n/a n/a Ardmore Higher Education Center 0.0% $0.0 0.0% $0.0 0.0% $0.0 0.0% $0.0 Professional Programs n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.1% $9.38 0.0% $9.38 Considerations in Setting Tuition and Fees. Oklahoma Statutes (Title 70, O. S. 2004 Supp., Section 3218.2) further provides that the impact on the ability of students to meet the costs of attendance, their enrollment patterns, availability of financial aid, the cost- effective measures which institutions implemented, and the communication of tuition and fee requests to students are to be considered when determining increases to tuition and mandatory fees. Institutions reported on each of these categories when submitting their tuition and mandatory fee requests for FY10. The findings from the institutions’ information are summarized below, with further details provided in the full report on the following pages. Impact on Students’ Ability to Pay. For FY10 institutions implemented the Putting Families First: Higher Education’s Tuition Freeze Plan allowing them to hold tuition rates at the same level as in FY09. Mandatory fees at all institutions, with the exception of two community colleges, will also remain the same as in FY09, resulting in an overall average increase of less than
Recommended publications
  • Cornell University New York State College Of
    Cornell University ANNOUNCEMENTS New York State College of Agriculture 1968-69 A Statutory College of the State University, At Cornell University, Ithaca, New York Cornell University New York State College of Agriculture 1968-69 A Statutory College of the State University, At Cornell University, Ithaca, New York Cornell Academic Calendar 1968-69* 1969-70* Registration, new students F, Sept. 13 F, Sept. 12 Registration, old students s, Sept. 14 S, Sept. 13 Fall term instruction begins, 7:30 a . m . M, Sept. 16 M, Sept. 15 Midterm grade reports due s, Oct. 26 S, Oct. 25 Thanksgiving recess: Instruction suspended, 1:10 p . m . W, Nov. 27 W, Nov. 26 Instruction resumed, 7:30 a . m . M,Dec. 2 M, Dec. 1 Fall term instruction ends, 1:10 p . m . s, Dec. 21 S, Dec. 20 Christmas recess: Independent study period begins M, Jan. 6 M, Jan. 5 Final examinations begin M, Jan. 13 M, Jan. 12 Final examinations end T, Jan. 21 T, Jan. 20 Intersession begins W, Jan. 22 W, Jan. 21 Registration, old students F, Jan. 31 F, Jan. 30 Registration, new students s, Feb. 1 S, Jan. 31 Spring term instruction begins, 7:30 a . m . M,Feb. 3 M, Feb. 2 Deadline: changed or make-up grades M, Feb. 10 M, Feb. 9 Midterm grade reports due s, M ar. 15 S, M ar. 14 Spring recess: Instruction suspended, 1:10 p . m . s, M ar. 29 S, Mar. 28 Instruction resumed, 7:30 a . m . M, Apr. 7 M, Apr. 6 Spring term instruction ends, 1:10 p .
    [Show full text]
  • DOCUMENT RESUME ED 044 604 AC 008 751 AUTHOR Beisdorf
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 044 604 AC 008 751 AUTHOR Beisdorf, Heinz; And Others TITLE Community Resource Development. INSTITUTION State Univ. of New York, Ithaca. Coll. of Agriculture at Cornell Univ.; State Univ. of New York, Ithaca. Coll. of come Economics at Cornell Univ. PUB DATE 5 Apr 68 NOTE 42p.; Report of Task rorce EDRS PRICE FURS Price MF-$0.25 HC-$2.20 DESCRIPTORS *Administrative Organization, *Community Development, *Community Resources, Financial Support, Natural Resources, Personnel Needs, Problem Solving, Program Content, Program Effectiveness, Research Utilization, *Role Perception, *Rural Extension, Social Change, Staff Improvement IDENTIFIERS Cooperative Extension Service, Cornell Univers&ty, New York State ABSTRACT In New York State, Cooperative Extension's principal goal iu community resource development is, through education, to iu:Arease the effectiveness in making end implementing public decisions concerning improvements in the quality and level of living of all people. education and adaptive research are the two basic roles Extension will use to achieve that goal. The Task Force recommends, among other things, that; when practical, rxtension faculty positions concerned with community resource development also involve research; the scope of Extension's program consist of four main categories -- community organization and administration, community functions and services, natural resource utilization, and physical environmental improvement; the primary target clientele for the Cooperative Extension program in community resource development he key individuals and groups of community leaders who influence the community's future; regional specialists be used in identified metropolitan areas. (Author/tit) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION S WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGINATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECES.
    [Show full text]
  • Teachers, School Boards, and Collective Bargaining--A Changing of the Guard
    R E P O R T R E S U M E S ED 017 016 EA 001 057 TEACHERS, SCHOOL BOARDS, AND COLLECTIVE BARGAINING--A CHANGING OF THE GUARD. BY- DOHERTY, ROBERT E. OBERER, WALTER E. STATE UNIV. OF N.Y., ITHACA REPORT NUMBER ILR-PAPERBACK-NO-2 PUB DATE MAY 67 EDRS PRICE MF-$0.75 HC-$5.92 146F. DESCRIPTORS- *TEACHERS, *BOARDS OF EDUCATION, *COLLECTIVE BARGAINING, EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES, TEACHER SALARIES, FRINGE BENEFITS, TEACHING CONDITIONS, *TEACHER ASSOCIATIONS, SANCTIONS, TEACHER STRIKES, COLLECTIVE NEGOTIATION, CONTRACTS, *STATE LEGISLATION, EMPLOYER EMPLOYEE RELATIONSHIP, GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES, ITHACA, NEA, AFT, FOUR MAJOR AREAS OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING FOR TEACHERS; BASED ON A REVIEW OF HISTORICAL RECORDS, A COMPARISON OF EXPERIENCES, A STUDY OF RELEVANT DOCUMENTS, AND INTERVIEWS WITH PERSONNEL DIRECTLY INVOLVED ARE DEFINED AND ANALYZED--(1) FACTORS GIVING RISE TO THE BILATERAL DETERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT CONDITIONS IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS, (2) THE CHARACTER OF THE TWO TEACHER ORGANIZATIONS BEHIND THE MOVEMENT;(3) LEGAL QUESTIONS RAISED BY COLLECTIVE ACTION AMONG TEACHERS, AND (4) IMPLICATIONS OF TEACHER BARGAINING FOR THE QUALITY OF THE EDUCATIONAL ENTERPRISE. THE INCREASING DEMAND FOR FORMALIZED EMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENTS WITH LOCAL SCHOOL BOARDS IS DUE TO A PROPORTIONATE INC1EASE IN THE NUMBER OF MALE TEACHERS, LOW SALARIES, UNSATISTACTORY WORKING CONDITIONS, THE MOUNTING FRUSTRATION OF PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHING, AND GROWING COMPETITION BETWEEN THE TWO MAJOR TEACHER ORGANIZATIONS. SPECIAL ATTENTION IS GIVEN TO QUESTIONS CONCERNING DESIRABLE STATE LEGISLATION, INCLUDING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF REPRESENTATION: UNFAIR PRACTICES, STRIKES, SANCTIONS, NEGOTIATION AND IMPASSE PROCEDURES, AND THE ADMINISTRATION OF LEGISLATION WHEN ENACTED. A COMPARISON OF REPRESENTATIVE PROVISIONS IN TWO COMPREHENSIVE TEACHER-SCHOOL BOARD AGREEMENTS NEGOTIATED BY AFT AND NEA AFFILIATES IS APPENDED.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Statutory Rate
    New York Statutory Rate Igor is malacopterygian and Indianized functionally as tan Kendall ret witheringly and vacation frigidly. Visual and senile Adlai buffeting while quincuncial Earl retains her waist unchastely and rights scenically. Tenseless Archie operate aloof and uncomfortably, she overglances her anklung halloing measurably. All benefits are brother to natural terms and conditions of important policy. When these records are available, auditors are requesting them. You are required to provide reports to subordinate court every prejudice, and you hear get best legal trouble which it ended up transmit the polish commission is calculated incorrectly. It can important you make any that below are taking smart advantage upon the increased federal and New York State exemptions and avoiding pitfalls by the mean discrepancy between federal and NY exemption amounts. The trustee gets two kinds of fees: annual fees and paying out fees. New York equivalent of longevity charge. Delete the case law provides benefits cannot be created a general consensus amongst all businesses can vary depending on restructuring the amount times. Do family Need to closure a Lawyer for My DAT? Complete Payroll Processing, Inc. Prepayment penalty provisions surrounding a financial instrument may be considered interest in calculating the slight interest charged to determine as a financial instrument is criminally usurious. The NYC BCT conforms with most aspects of NYS corporate tax reform, with these few notable exceptions. Social Security is a federal insurance program that provides benefits to retired employees and also disabled. If so, subtract food from gross pay before get start applying federal payroll taxes. There still two schools of thought regarding the late first and desperate charge.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Health Advisory and Advisory Changes On
    EFFECTS OF THE HEALTH ADVISORY AND ADVISORY CHANGES ON FISHING HABITS AND FISH CONSUMPTION IN NEW YORK SPORT FISHERIES by Nancy A. Connelly, Barbara A. Knuth, and Carole A. Bfeogni I Report for New York Sea Grant Institute Project No. R/FHD-2-PD I Series No. 92-9 September 1992 Human Dimensions Research Unit Department of Natural Resources New York State College of Agriculture and Life Sciences A Statutory College of the State University Fernow Hall, Cornell University, hhaca, N.Y. 14853 1 I 800857 I EFFECTS OF THE HEALTH ADVISORY AND ADVISORY CHANGES ON FISHING HABITS AND FISH CONSUMPTION IN NEW YORK SPORT FISHERIES by Nancy A. Connelly, Barbara A. Knuth, and Caroie A. Bisogni I Report for New York Sea Grant Institute Project No. R/FHD-2-PD o Series No. 92-9 September 1992 Human Dimensions Research Unit Department of Natural Resources New York State College of Agriculture and Life Sciences t- A Statutory College of the State University Fernow Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. 14853 800858 EFFECTS OF THE HEALTH ADVISORY AND ADVISORY CHANGES ON FISHING HABITS AND FISH CONSUMPTION IN NEW YORK SPORT FISHERIES Nancy A. Connelly and Barbara A. Knuth Human Dimensions Research Unit Department of Natural Resources College of Agriculture and Life Sciences and Carole A. Bisogni Division of Nutritional Sciences College of Human Ecology Cornell University Ithaca, New York Report for New York Sea Grant Institute Project No. R/FHD-2-PD 800859 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Jim Colquhoun, Bureau of Environmental Protection, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, and John Hesse, Michigan Department of Public Health, assisted with initiation of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Awards Handout
    Oklahoma Collegiate Media Association – 2011 Awards Competition – March 31, 2011 (Entries were judged by members of the Kansas Associated Collegiate Press.) Individual Awards Honorable Mention EDITORIAL WRITING Individual Awards Second Place 4-Year Schools Christopher Wyche First Place 2- & 4-Year Schools Philip Maucieri East Central University Jennifer Massey Southwestern Oklahoma State University NEWS WRITING Oklahoma City Community College DISPLAY ADS Honorable Mention First Place Tyler Silvy Second Place First Place Third Place Kylie Pool Oklahoma State University Jeremy Cloud Liliya Smal Christopher Wyche Oklahoma State University Oral Roberts University Oklahoma City Community College East Central University SPORTS WRITING Second Place First Place Third Place Second Place Honorable Mention Lornna Bates Sherman Merchant Jordan McCown Ethan Hendricks Laron Short Southeastern Oklahoma State Oral Roberts University Oklahoma City Community College Oral Roberts University University of Science & Arts of University Oklahoma Third Place Second Place Honorable Mention Third Place Kari Merrick Adriana Valtinson Donald Ashwood Honorable Mention Adam Kemp Southwestern Oklahoma Rose State College Oklahoma City University Jason Culp Oklahoma State University State University Oklahoma State University Honorable Mention FEATURE WRITING Honorable Mention Third Place Nathan Hatcher INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING Rachel Whitlock First Place Oklahoma City University Ryan Stewart First Place Oral Roberts University Morgan Beard Oklahoma State University Oklahoma
    [Show full text]
  • Reach Higher Two-Year Policy Sheet
    www.ReachHigherOklahoma.org Associate Degree Completion Program Participating Community Colleges and Technical Branches: A group of community college academic officers convened in 2010 to develop a degree completion associate’s degree program. In September 2010, the State Regents approved the Associate in Science in Enterprise Development (emphasis in Business Administration) and the Associate in Arts in Enterprise Development (emphasis in General Studies). Twelve community colleges and two technical branches deliver the program across the state: Carl Albert State College in Poteau Connors State College in Warner and Muskogee Eastern Oklahoma State College in Wilburton Murray State College in Tishomingo and Ardmore Northeastern Oklahoma A&M College in Miami Northern Oklahoma College in Tonkawa and Enid Oklahoma City Community College in Oklahoma City Redlands Community College in El Reno Rose State College in Midwest City Seminole State College in Seminole Tulsa Community College in Tulsa Western Oklahoma State College in Altus Oklahoma State University-Oklahoma City in Oklahoma City Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology in Okmulgee. Degree Program: Associate in Arts in Enterprise Development (General Studies emphasis) Associate in Science in Enterprise Development (Business Administration emphasis) When courses started: January 2011. How many Courses: 60 total credit hours (37 general education courses; 23 major courses). General Education and Business Option courses are specified to come from approved CEP course groupings. No substitutions are allowed for general education or the business option. The Goals: The goals of the Reach Higher program are: To increase the number of Oklahoman’s who obtain an associate’s degree. To facilitate life-long learning goals of adult learners.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Practicum/Internship Sites # Type of Agency Location
    Potential Practicum/Internship Sites # Type of Agency Location Oklahoma Healthcare Authority 4545 N. Lincoln Boulevard OK 1 Oklahoma City, OK 73105 Oklahoma Health Care Authority 4545 N. Lincoln Blvd. OK 2 Oklahoma City, OK 73105 Norman Alcoholic Information Center 215 West Main OK 3 Norman, OK 73106 Division of Rehabilitation Services State of Oklahoma 2401 NE 23rd OK Oklahoma City, OK 73107 4 5 Peace of Mind Counseling Center 1330 Classen Blvd., Suite 214 OK 6 Oklahoma City, OK 73106 Park University, Tinker Campus Center 72 MSS/DPEE Bldg 201 SE OK 7751 1st Street, Ste 105 7 Tinker AFB 73145-9148 Park University, Tinker Campus Center 72 MSS/DPEE Bldg 201 SE OK 7751 1st Street, Ste 105 8 Tinker AFB 73145-9148 Oklahoma City Community College - Career Transition Program OK 7777 S. May Avenue 9 Oklahoma City, OK 73159-4444 Social Security Administration Office of Disability Adjudication & Review 301 NW 6th St. Ste. 300 OK Oklahoma City, OK 73102 10 (405) 254-5505 Community Action Agency Turning Point South OK 1607 S.W. 15th Street 11 Oklahoma City, OK 73108 Lancaster County Day Treatment Center Lancaster, California CA 12 Department of Rehabilitation Services 1801 E. 1st OK 13 Okmulgee, OK 74447 14 St. Anthony Hospital Behavior Center Volunteers of America 4300 N.W. Lincoln Blvd., Room 201 OK 15 Oklahoma City, OK 73105 Lifemasters Supported Self Care, Inc. 5000 Shoreline Court, Ste 300 CA 16 So. San Francisco CA 94080 D&S Life Care Consultants 610 Vickie OK 17 Yukon, OK 73099 Division of Rehabilitation 444 South Houston, Ste.
    [Show full text]
  • Cornell Agricultural Economics Staff Paper
    CORNELL AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS STAFF PAPER CONCEPT MAPS: A TOOL FOR TEACHERS AND LEARNERS by Deborah H. Streeter Assistant Professor Department of ~ricu1tural Economics Cornell University . Ithaca, N.Y. July 1991 SP 91-18 • Department of Agricultural Economics Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station New York State College of Agriculture and Life Sciences A Statutory College of the Slate University Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 14853 It is the policy of Cornell University actively to support equality of educational and employment opportunity. No person shall be denied admission to any educational program or activity or be denied employment on the basis of any legally prohibited dis­ crimination involving, but not limited to, such factors as race, color, creed, religion, national or ethnic origin, sex, age or handicap. The University is committed to the maintenance of - affirmative action programs which will assure the continuation ~" of such equality of opportunity. Abstract Concept maps are a tool developed at Cornell University. designed for use as a metacognitive strategy. or a general strategy. that helps the student "learn how to learn." The goal of this paper is to illustrate how concept mapping can be used to integrate multidisciplinary subject maUer. assist the teacher in understanding the knowledge base of the student. reveal misconceptions or missing conceptual links. help resolve communications problems between the student and the professor. and encourage reflective thinking by all participants in the learning process. Three specific teaching situations are presented: 1) preparation of class materials. 2) communication with students in the classroom or the office. and 3) training of a teaching assistant.
    [Show full text]
  • Bison Baseball Celebrates Historic Season Page 16
    100th SPRING COMMENCEMENT THREE GROUNDBREAKING CEREMONIES WORLD CUP OUTREACH SUMMER 2014 MAGAZINE A PUBLICATION OF OKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY BISON BASEBALL CELEBRATES HISTORIC SEASON PAGE 16 OBU MAGAZINE SUMMER 2014 1 2 SUMMER 2014 OBU MAGAZINE SUMMER 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT 3 1912 COMMENCEMENT ADDRESS Words of William H. Butler, Member of OBU’s First Graduating Class. 4 100th COMMENCEMENT 2014 Marks OBU’s 100th Spring Commencement 5 GRADUATES OF THE 100th CLASS Five Outstanding Senior Award Recipients 8 OBU 2020 A Glimpse at the Journey to Reach OBU’s Strategic Vision STREET PRAYER 10 STAVROS GROUNDBREAKING With the help of a Brazilian Baptist translator, New Facility Underway for College of Nursing Allie Preston, left, and Kenzi Bice, players on OBU’s 12 CAMPUS CONSTRUCTION UPDATE soccer team, pray with two boys after telling them the Residential Village; Mathena Center; Cafeteria story of Jesus. Later that evening at an outdoor worship service near Ceará-Mirim, Brazil, Kenzi and Allie gave the 14 ON BISON HILL boys their first Bibles. The young women were part of Hobbs Award; Retirees; Faculty/Staff Awards; Bison Coffee the OBU team’s mission trip to Brazil. 16 BASEBALL’S HISTORIC SEASON Coach Bobby Cox and His Team’s 2014 National Ranking 18 LADY BISON SOCCER IN BRAZIL î World Cup Outreach 20 ATHLETICS Learfield Cup; Football Schedule; Coach Mastin Award; Track Wrap Up 22 PROFILE IN EXCELLENCE AWARD RECIPIENTS Glen Redding Jr.; Ray Ballew; Ryan Abernathy; Susan Wooten 26 ALUMNI NEWS Homecoming and Tailgating Save the Dates 27 ALUMNI NOTES Future Bison; Marriage; Class Notes; Obituaries IMB PHOTO BY LINA WHITE IMB PHOTO BY LINA OBU MAGAZINE SUMMER 2014 1 FROM THE PRESIDENT OBUmagazine SUMMER 2014 | VOLUME 9, NUMBER 2 OBU MAGAZINE STAFF Editor In 1912, nine OBU students gathered at Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Veteran Survey Results
    Veteran Survey Results BACKGROUND The Oklahoma Works Veteran Survey was launched on September 11, 2017 and was fielded to student veterans at postsecondary institutions across the state of Oklahoma. The purpose of the survey was to better understand what obstacles or difficulties military and veteran students face when trying to access benefits or any other challenges in the college experiences in general. To achieve validity, a response number of 337 was needed. When the survey closed in October 27, 2017, it had garnered 397 responses. Response rate from top ten schools. Response rate from schools past the “top ten” mark are in the 2% and lower range. Mid-American Christian The University of Oklahoma University University of Oklahoma Health Oklahoma State University Sciences Center Southwestern Oklahoma State Cameron University University East Central University Rose State College Northeastern State University Rogers State Rogers State Northeastern State University Rose State College East Central University Cameron University Southwestern Oklahoma State University Oklahoma State University University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center The University of Oklahoma Mid-American Christian University 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% Oklahoma Works: Building Oklahoma’s Future Workforce. www.oklahomaworks.gov | [email protected] | 900 N. Portland Ave., BT300, Oklahoma City, OK 73107 RESULTS Demographics The findings show that the majority of the 397 survey respondents were full-time students (85.6%)i pursuing a bachelor degree (58.7%)ii. Most (46.9%) were army veterans, with Air Force following (25.7%) and Marines and Navy almost tied.iii We see an interesting spread in responses to the length of service question: 40 percent served 10 years or more, which is a surprising number with a variety of implications.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016-2018 Graduate Catalog
    AlfredUniversity 2016-2018 GRADUATE CATALOG individuals inspired Table of Contents 3 Campus Map Alfred University at a Glance ............................................................................. 6 University Profile/Vision and Mission ................................................................ 7 Admissions ........................................................................................................... 8 Tuition, Fees and Financial Aid ........................................................................11 Student Life .........................................................................................................19 Academics ..........................................................................................................29 Summary of Graduate Degree Programs Offered ...........................................29 Grades and Grade Point Average ....................................................................30 Graduate Academic Standing (Academic Performance) .................................33 Accreditation ..................................................................................................39 Research .........................................................................................................39 University Libraries ........................................................................................42 Technology Resources ....................................................................................44 Degree Programs ................................................................................................48
    [Show full text]