Hickory Bark Beetle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Pest Profile Photo credit: Natasha Wright, Cook's Pest Control, Bugwood.org licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Common Name: Hickory bark beetle Scientific Name: Scolytus quadrispinosus Say Order and Family: Coleoptera, Curculionidae (Subfamily: Scolytidae) Size and Appearance: Length (mm) Appearance ellipsoidal Egg cream colored short curved or slightly c-shaped legless Larva/Nymph 5 – 8 yellowish white wrinkled short stout thickly cylindrical black to reddish brown almost hairless Adult 2.9 – 5 front tibiae have a short-curved spine or hook males – venter (underside of the abdomen) is deeply excavated; third abdominal segment armed with three spines females – venter (underside of the abdomen) less deeply excavated and without spines very compact Pupa (if fragile applicable) white Type of feeder (Chewing, sucking, etc.): Chewing mouthparts Host plant/s: Hickory, pecan, butternut. Prefers hickories, with shagbark and bitternut hickories listed most often in the literature. Description of Damage (larvae and adults): Adults feed in terminal growth, and larvae tunnel in trunks and large branches. Newly emerged adults feed on twigs in the crown throughout summer. They make short food tunnels in twigs, mainly at the base of axillary buds and leaves. Heavy twig feeding may cause yellowish and premature dropping of leaves and broken twigs scattered over the crown but rarely seriously weaken the tree. The foliage of heavily infested trees turns yellow and then red within weeks of attack, and finally brown as the tree succumbs. Trees stressed and weak from drought, fire, storm damage, disease, or other causes are most susceptible. Reference: Barnd, B. (2007) Species Scolytus quadrispinosus - Hickory Bark BeetlE. Retrieved from https://bugguide.net/node/view/122189. Solomon, J. D. (1995). Guide to insect borers in North American broadleaf trees and shrubs. Agriculture Handbook (Washington), (AH-706). .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Michigan Forests 2014
United States Department of Agriculture Michigan Forests 2014 Forest Service Northern Resource Bulletin Publication Date Research Station NRS-110 April 2017 Abstract The eighth inventory of Michigan’s forests, completed in 2014, describes more than 20.3 million acres of forest land. The data in this report are based on visits to 4,289 forested plots from 2009 to 2014. Timberland accounts for 95 percent of this forest land, and 62 percent is privately owned. The sugar maple/beech/yellow birch forest type accounts for 19 percent of the State’s forest land, followed by aspen (12 percent) and white oak/red oak/hickory (7 percent). Balsam fir, red maple, and sugar maple are the three most common species by number of trees. Growing-stock volume on timberland has continued to increase and now totals about 30.2 billion cubic feet (ft3). The associated net growth, harvest removals, and mortality totaled 674, 313, and 303 million ft3/ year, respectively. In addition to information on forest attributes, this report includes data on forest health, land use change, family forest owners, timber-product outputs, and future forests. Detailed information on forest inventory methods, data quality estimates, and important resource statistics can be found online at https://doi.org/10.2737/NRS-RB-110. Acknowledgments We thank the field crew for their hard work and dedication while collecting the information that is the basis for this report. Special thanks also go to Mark Hatfield, Paul Sowers, John Vissage, Barry Wilson, Barb O’Connell, Charles Barnett, and Dale Gormanson who also contributed to this report.
[Show full text]
GIS Handbook Appendices
Aerial Survey GIS Handbook Appendix D Revised 11/19/2007 Appendix D Cooperating Agency Codes The following table lists the aerial survey cooperating agencies and codes to be used in the agency1, agency2, agency3 fields of the flown/not flown coverages. The contents of this list is available in digital form (.dbf) at the following website: http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/publications/id/id_guidelines.html 28 Aerial Survey GIS Handbook Appendix D Revised 11/19/2007 Code Agency Name AFC Alabama Forestry Commission ADNR Alaska Department of Natural Resources AZFH Arizona Forest Health Program, University of Arizona AZS Arizona State Land Department ARFC Arkansas Forestry Commission CDF California Department of Forestry CSFS Colorado State Forest Service CTAES Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station DEDA Delaware Department of Agriculture FDOF Florida Division of Forestry FTA Fort Apache Indian Reservation GFC Georgia Forestry Commission HOA Hopi Indian Reservation IDL Idaho Department of Lands INDNR Indiana Department of Natural Resources IADNR Iowa Department of Natural Resources KDF Kentucky Division of Forestry LDAF Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry MEFS Maine Forest Service MDDA Maryland Department of Agriculture MADCR Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation MIDNR Michigan Department of Natural Resources MNDNR Minnesota Department of Natural Resources MFC Mississippi Forestry Commission MODC Missouri Department of Conservation NAO Navajo Area Indian Reservation NDCNR Nevada Department of Conservation
[Show full text]
Field Instructions for The
FIELD INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE URBAN INVENTORY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 2017 FOREST INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS RESOURCE MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION USDA FOREST SERVICE Note to User: URBAN FIA Field Guide 7.1 is based on the National CORE Field Guide, Version 7.1. Data elements are national CORE unless indicated as follows: • National CORE data elements that end in “+U” (e.g., x.x+U) have had values,codes, or text added, changed, or adjusted from the CORE program. Any additional URBAN FIA text for a national CORE data element is hi-lighted or shown as an "Urban Note". • All URBAN FIA data elements end in “U” (e.g., x.xU). The text for an URBAN FIA data element is not hi- lighted and does not have a corresponding variable in CORE. • URBAN FIA electronic file notes: • national CORE data elements that are not applicable in URBAN FIA are formatted as light gray or light gray hidden text. • hyperlink cross-references are included for various sections, figures, and tables. *National CORE data elements retain their national CORE field guide data element/variable number but may not retain their national CORE field guide location or sequence within the guide. pg.3 Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION . 11 SECTION 1.1 URBAN OVERVIEW. .11 SECTION 1.2 FIELD GUIDE LAYOUT . 12 SECTION 1.3 UNITS OF MEASURE . 12 CHAPTER 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION . 13 SECTION 2.1 PLOT SETUP . 15 SECTION 2.2 PLOT INTEGRITY . 15 SECTION 2.3 PLOT MONUMENTATION . 15 ITEM 2.3.0.1 MONUMENT TYPE (CORE 0.3.1U) .
[Show full text]
And Wood-Infesting Coleoptera and Associated Parasitoids Reared from Shagbark Hickory (Carya Ovata) and Slippery Elm (Ulmus Rubra) in Ingham County, Michigan
The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 53 Numbers 3 & 4 - Fall/Winter 2020 Numbers 3 & Article 13 4 - Fall/Winter 2020 December 2020 Bark- and Wood-Infesting Coleoptera and Associated Parasitoids Reared from Shagbark Hickory (Carya ovata) and Slippery elm (Ulmus rubra) in Ingham County, Michigan Robert A. Haack USDA Forest Service, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Haack, Robert A. 2020. "Bark- and Wood-Infesting Coleoptera and Associated Parasitoids Reared from Shagbark Hickory (Carya ovata) and Slippery elm (Ulmus rubra) in Ingham County, Michigan," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 53 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol53/iss2/13 This Scientific Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Haack: Rearing records from shagbark hickory and slippery elm 2020 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 185 Bark- and Wood-Infesting Coleoptera and Associated Parasitoids Reared from Shagbark Hickory (Carya ovata) and Slippery Elm (Ulmus rubra) in Ingham County, Michigan Robert A. Haack USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 3101 Technology Blvd., Suite F, Lansing, MI 48910 [e-mail: [email protected] (emeritus)] Abstract Ten species of bark- and wood-infesting Coleoptera (borers) and five parasitoid species (Hymenoptera) were reared from shagbark hickory [Carya ovata (Mill.) K. Koch] branches 1-2 years after tree death, and similarly, seven borers and eight parasitoids were reared from slippery elm (Ulmus rubra Muhl.) branches one year after tree death in Ingham County, Michigan, in 1986-87.
[Show full text]
A Contribution to the Biology of the Pseudohylesinus Nebulosus (Leconte) (Coleoptera:Scolytidae), Especially in Relation to Th
AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF KAREL J. STOSZEK for the DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (Name) (Degree) in ENTOMOLOGY presented on DECEMBER 4, 1972 (Major) (Date) Title: A CONTRIBUTION TO THE BIOLOGY OF PSEUDOHYLESINUS NEBULOSUS (LECONTE) (COLEOPTERA:SCOLYTIDAE), ESPECIALLY IN RELATION TO THE MOISTURE STRESS OF ITS HOST, DOUGLAS-FIR Abstract approved: Redacted for Privacy Professor Julius A. Rudifisky The study (1) describes the life cycle of P. nebulosus, (2) examines stimuli that may cause the beetles to locate brood material, and (3) establishes the relationship between moisture stress in Douglas-fir and colonization by P. nebuZosus.and other meristem insects. (1) Development of P. nebulosus goes through the egg stage, three larval instars, and the pupal and callow adult stages. Teneral adults emerge from late spring through fall, disperse, and feed in tissues of live Douglas-fir twigs before attaining sexual maturity. Progeny initiated in early spring may become capable of reproduction and initiate colonization of susceptible host material in fall. P. nebulosus overwinters in all stages except the egg and pupal stages, hibernating in feeding tunnels or galleries of newly colonized breeding sites. The main breeding period is the early spring. Females begin gallery construction. (2) The flight of immature beetles is governed by temperature, but is induced by light and appears primarily oriented toward light. Positive photic response appears to overpower response to vegetative stimuli. Temperature induces a reversal in the beetle's photic response at two thresholds (15.5°C and 34°C). Decrease of light intensity to 17 f.c. induces a light negative and thigmotactic response.
[Show full text]
Volume 43 Number 3
Wisconsin Entomological Society N e w s I e t t e r Volume 43. Number 3 October 201 6 Photographing Insects for a Group This is the recipe that we used if By A1ike and Marcie O 'Connor you·d like to try it yourself. marcie(a)haven2.com Ingredients: • Two people - a photographer and a We came up with a new idea for our projector-operator annual moth party event this year, and it • A camera that writes pictures to an SD worked so well that we thought other people card might be interested. • An Evefi WiFi SD card ($70 - $100) One of the problems people always • A laptop with a WiFi interface have - especially folks who have never • A projector, attached to the laptop looked at moths before - is that moths are • A screen (we asked our friends if they had hard to appreciate by just looking at them any hand-me-downs and wound up with with your eyes. The colors are often subtle, three to choose from) and the designs tiny. So we came up with • Extension cords with enough plugs to this idea - to let people see the enlarged power the laptop and the projector photos as I'm taking them (Fig. 1) . • Two things to sit on, one for me and one for the projector Get ready. Setting up the camera-to-laptop connection the first time: • Put the card in the camera and turn the camera on Fig. 1. Photo by Wendy Johnson. • Install the EyeFi Mobi Desktop software on the laptop and launch it • Go through the --Activate Mobi Card'' comes back within range, the photos will steps resume transferring - and catch • Take some pictures up.
[Show full text]
Field Instructions for the Urban Inventory of San
FIELD INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE URBAN INVENTORY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA & PORTLAND, OREGON 2018 FOREST INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS RESOURCE MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION USDA FOREST SERVICE Note to User: URBAN FIA Field Guide 7.2 is based on the National CORE Field Guide, Version 7.2. Data elements are national CORE unless indicated as follows: • National CORE data elements that end in “+U” (e.g., x.x+U) have had values,codes, or text added, changed, or adjusted from the CORE program. Any additional URBAN FIA text for a national CORE data element is hi-lighted or shown as an "Urban Note". • All URBAN FIA data elements end in “U” (e.g., x.xU). The text for an URBAN FIA data element is not hi- lighted and does not have a corresponding variable in CORE. • URBAN FIA electronic file notes: • national CORE data elements that are not applicable in URBAN FIA are formatted as light gray or light gray hidden text. • hyperlink cross-references are included for various sections, figures, and tables. *National CORE data elements retain their national CORE field guide data element/variable number but may not retain their national CORE field guide location or sequence within the guide. pg.3 Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION . 11 SECTION 1.1 URBAN OVERVIEW. .11 SECTION 1.2 FIELD GUIDE LAYOUT . 12 SECTION 1.3 UNITS OF MEASURE . 12 CHAPTER 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION . 13 SECTION 2.1 PLOT SETUP . 15 SECTION 2.2 PLOT INTEGRITY . 15 SECTION 2.3 PLOT MONUMENTATION . 15 ITEM 2.3.0.1 MONUMENT TYPE (CORE 0.3.1U) .
[Show full text]
Hickory Report
Hickory Shagbark hickory, Carya ovata Bitternut hickory, Carya cordiformis The volume in hickory has increased steadily over the last several decades and is aging. Since 1983, the volume in large trees has more than tripled while the volume in small trees has only increased 21%. Growth rates haven’t changed significantly since 1983 but mortality has quadrupled. Hickory accounts for about 1.4% of volume and growth but only 0.7% of mortality and 0.9% of removals. The volume of bitternut hickory is expected to decrease in the next 40 years while the volume of shagbark hickory should increase substantially. Hickory is not a prominent timber species, accounting for only 0.3% of roundwood production in 2009. Although removals have increased five-fold since 1983, we harvest much less hickory compared to other species. Hickory wood has the highest density of all species in Wisconsin and therefore may be a valuable source of woody biomass. • How has the hickory resource changed? Growing stock volume and diameter class distribution • Where is hickory found in Wisconsin? Growing stock volume by region with map • What kind of sites does hickory grow on? Habitat type and site index distribution • How fast is hickory growing? Average annual net growth: trends and ratio of growth to volume • How healthy is hickory in Wisconsin? Average annual mortality: trends and ratio of mortality to volume • Does hickory have any disease or pest issues? 100 Canker Disease: biology, symptoms and impact • How much hickory do we harvest? Roundwood production by product and ratio of growth to removals • How much hickory biomass do we have? Aboveground biomass by region of the state Division of Forestry • Can we predict the future of beech? WI Dept of Natural Resources December 2019 Modelling future volumes “How has the hickory resource changed?” Growing stock volume and diameter class distribution by year The growing stock volume of hickory in 2018 was about 301 million cubic feet or 1.4% of total statewide volume (chart on right).
[Show full text]
Forest Vegetation Species Requirements.Pdf
GREAT TRINITY FOREST Forest Vegetation Species Requirements Descriptions of the major forest vegetation types. Volume 15 Table of Contents Section Page # Description of Major Tree Species 1 Ailanthus 2 American basswood 8 American elm 20 Black walnut 30 Black willow 45 Boxelder 53 Bur oak 61 Cedar elm 71 Cedar elm Fact Sheet 78 Chinaberry 80 Weed of the Week: Chinaberry Tree 81 Chinaberry Fact Sheet 82 Chinese tallow tree 84 Weed of the Week: Chinese tallow tree 85 Natural Area Weeds: Chinese tallow (Sapium sebiferum) 86 Chinese Privet 90 Common persimmon 96 Eastern cottonwood 104 Plains cottonwood 113 Eastern redbud 124 Eastern redcedar 131 Green ash 147 Honeylocust 158 Live oak 168 Osage-orange 173 Pecan 184 Post oak 193 Red mulberry 202 Shumard oak 208 Sugarberry 214 Sycamore 221 Texas ash 233 Texas ash Fact Sheet 234 Ash Fact Sheet 237 Texas Buckeye 242 White ash 249 White mulberry 259 Weed of the Week: White mulberry 260 Ohio Perennial and Biennial Weed Guide: White mulberry 261 Mulberry Fact Sheet 264 Winged elm 269 Major Tree Species Literature Cited 275 Understory Species Requirements 277 Aster spp. 278 Roundleaf greenbriar 282 Japanese honeysuckle 285 Poison ivy 289 Western soapberry 292 Field pansy 296 Common blue violet 298 Virginia creeper 301 Wild onion 305 Canada wildrye 309 Virginia wildrye 312 False garlic 316 Understory Plants Literature Cited 319 Description of Major Tree Species Currently there are seven major tree species and a number of minor tree species occupying the Great Trinity Forest. This section will briefly summarize each species and present supporting documentation should there be a deeper interest.
[Show full text]
This Disease Problem Has Been Gaining Popularity Or Un-Popularity
Hickory dieback and mortality in Wisconsin Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Forest Health Protection May, 2007 Recently dieback and mortality on hickory have been reported in southern, and east and west central Wisconsin. This problem has been observed both on bitternut and shagbark hickory. Mortality of hickory has also been reported in neighboring states such as Minnesota, Iowa, and Missouri. Recent research found that the mortality is associated with the hickory bark beetle and possibly the fungus Ceratocystis spp. The hickory bark beetle (Scolytus quadrispinosus), native to Wisconsin, is regarded as the most destructive insect of hickory in the eastern United States. Larvae of the hickory bark beetle attack and kill hickory trees by mining the phloem. Although the insect usually attacks overmature, weak, or recently killed trees, apparently healthy trees of all ages are also infested during outbreaks. Infested trees will show wilted leaves, twig and branch dieback, and often die. Feeding galleries are centipede-shaped and etched on the interface of sapwood (width 5-6 cm). Though both shagbark and bitternut hickories are commonly attacked by this insect, bitternut hickory appears more Hickory mortality seen in Dane County susceptible to attack for breeding purposes. Adults are short, stout, dark brown to black beetles, and are 4-5 mm in length. Adults begin to emerge around the middle of June, and highest beetle populations and seasonal activity are observed during July and early August. Adult beetles fly to the crowns of healthy host trees to feed at the base of leaf petioles and twig crotches for 10-15 days before they deposit eggs.
[Show full text]
The Native and Introduced Bark and Ambrosia Beetles of Michigan (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) Anthony I
2009 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 101 The Native and Introduced Bark and Ambrosia Beetles of Michigan (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) Anthony I. Cognato1, Nicolas Barc1, Michael Philip2, Roger Mech3, Aaron D. Smith1, Eric Galbraith1, Andrew J. Storer4, and Lawrence R. Kirkendall5 Abstract Our knowledge of the biogeography of Scolytinae of eastern temperate North America is very patchy. We used data from hand collecting, trapped material (from 65 of 83 counties), and museum collections, supplemented by literature records, to compile a list comprising 107 bark beetle species in 45 genera for Michigan, a state with an especially rich diversity of woody plants. We provide detailed collection data documenting 32 species not previously cata- logued for Michigan, 23 of which are new state records; the genera Trypophloeus and Trischidias are reported from Michigan for the first time. Fifteen Michigan scolytines are not native to North America; Ambrosiodmus rubricollis (Eich- hoff), Crypturgus pusillus (Gyllenhal), Euwallacea validus (Eichhoff), Xyleborus californicus Wood, Xylosandrus crassiusculus (Motschulsky) have not previously been found in the state. We report Michigan hosts for 67 species, including 49 new host associations for the 93 native species. Despite identifying over 4000 specimens for this study, we fully expect to find many more species: over 30 additional species occur in the Great Lakes region. ____________________ Faunistic studies are a first step towards a deeper understanding of the ecology of local biotic communities. These studies provide records of diversity and serve as reference points for the assessment of faunal differences due to time, space, or environmental conditions. To increase the understanding of regional scolytine faunas, we present a study begun in 1978 of the bark and ambrosia beetles of Michigan.
[Show full text]
Indiana Forests 2013
United States Department of Agriculture Indiana Forests 2013 Forest Service Northern Resource Bulletin Publication Date Research Station NRS-107 December 2016 Abstract This report summarizes the third full annualized inventory of Indiana forests conducted from 2009 to 2013 by the Forest Inventory and Analysis program of the Northern Research Station in cooperation with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Forestry. Indiana has nearly 4.9 million acres of forest land with an average of 454 trees per acre. Forest land is dominated by the white oak/red oak/hickory forest type, which occupies 72 percent of the total forest land area. Most stands are dominated by large trees. Seventy-eight percent of forest land consists of sawtimber, 15 percent contains poletimber, and 7 percent contains saplings/seedlings. Growing-stock volume on timberland has been rising since the 1980s and currently totals 9.1 billion cubic feet. Annual growth outpaced removals by a ratio of 3.3:1. Additional information on forest attributes, changing land use patterns, timber products, and forest health is included in this report. Detailed information on forest inventory methods and data quality, a glossary of terms, tabular estimates for a variety of forest characteristics, and additional resources are available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.2737/NRS- RB-107. Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank numerous individuals who contributed both to the inventory and analysis of Indiana’s forest resources. Primary field crew and QA staff for the 2009-2013 field inventory cycle included: Josh Anderson, Craig Blocker, Lance Dye, Jake Florine, Matt Goeke, Aaron Hawkins, Justin Herbaugh, Jacob Hougham, Pete Koehler, Greg Koontz, Kasey Krouse, Dominic Lewer, Derek Luchik, Sally Malone, Andy Mason, Will Smith, Jason Stephens, Glen Summers, Tom Thake, Mark Webb, and Greg Yapp.
[Show full text]