DOCSLIB.ORG

Master Thesis Mboev Kkaisheva

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Master Thesis Mboev Kkaisheva The Quest for Synergistic Effects in Horizontal Mergers Using Combined Transaction Cost Theory and Resource-based View The Case of Activision Blizzard Mariana Boev MSc International Business 6/6/14 Konstantina Kaisheva Economics MSc International Business Economics International Business Center Department of Business and Management Master Thesis: The Quest for Synergistic Effects in Horizontal Mergers Using Combined Transaction Cost Theory and Resource-based View Date of delivery: June 6, 2014 Page Count: 152 Written by: Mariana Boev _____________________________ Konstantina Kaisheva _____________________________ Examiners: Finn Frandsen Søren Eschen Executive Summary The following thesis encompasses the research and analysis the authors have conducted to explain how transaction cost theory and resource-based theory of the firm can be employed to understand the conditions under which horizontal integration may create competitive advantage. The merger of Activision and Blizzard Entertainment concluded in 2008 is chosen as the case, which the authors refer to in order to investigate the practical applications of synergy-creating horizontal mergers. The aim of the thesis is addressing the two theories and their applications towards horizontal mergers and proposing a combined framework which extends the theories towards understanding of the prerequisites of competitive advantage in terms of synergy. The aim of the thesis is approached by formulating the following problem statement: In regards to the theories exploring horizontal mergers, how can transaction cost theory and resource-based view of the firm be employed to explain the conditions under which the merged companies achieve competitive advantage and the consequences from synergy-creating M&As? Additionally the authors break down the problem statement into the following three research questions, which guide the analysis: 1. How can transaction cost theory and resource-based view be combined in order to understand the conditions under which horizontal mergers will achieve competitive advantage? 2. Taking into consideration the merger between Activision and Blizzard Entertainment in the interactive entertainment industry, how did the merger of the companies lead to operational efficiency and competitive advantage? 3. What are the consequences from the synergistic effects of the merger on the overall structure and performance of the industry? The methodological approach chosen is the systems view, developed by Arbnor and Bjerke (2009). The authors choose to study the relationships that are generated between the elements of transaction cost theory and resource based view and to develop a model that comprises the elements of the theories in addressing the case of horizontal mergers. This manner of addressing the thesis falls in the finality relationships of the system view, where the events of the theories are explained through their purpose and the driving force that influences the relationships, allowing the system created to be greater than the sum of its parts. The thesis is an academic research involving the deployment of qualitative research methods of secondary data, related to literature review and documentation analysis. 1 A chapter devoted to theoretical review includes summarized overview of the transaction cost theory, resource-based theory of the firm, discounted cash flow model and literature on the phenomenon of mergers and acquisitions. Following is the analysis chapter which involves the authors’ input on the manner in which the transaction cost theory and resource-based theory of the firm can be combined when understanding the circumstances under which horizontal integration can create synergy. The chapter includes the combined theoretical framework, proposed by the authors, as well as a detailed analysis of the case of the merger between Activision and Blizzard Entertainment and its correspondence with the research questions and the problems statement. Transaction cost theory can be related to horizontal mergers when combined with resource-based view to explain horizontal mergers which occur in order for the companies to obtain complementary strategically valuable resources. The combined framework presents a structured synthesis of the arguments for entering a horizontal integration option in order to attain synergistic effects (competitive advantage). It shows under what conditions and prerequisites can this be achieved. Addressing the case of the merger, the authors conduct discounted cash fow model to evaluate the standalone values of the two firms in 2007 and their combined value in 2010. The Activision Blizzard valuation of 2010 revealed that the newly formed company has reached a standalone value of $10.851 billion, which clearly demonstrates that the merger of the companies has led to operational efficiency. The authors go one step further to analyze what is the influence of the synergy from the merger on the interactive entertainment industry and their main rival Electronic Arts. It is shown that following the horizontal merger, the overall performance of the industry is positive whereas the operating performance of the competitor will be negative. The thesis is concluded with a recommendations and reflections chapter outlining further research opportunities and the authors’ reflective research process. The contribution of this thesis is towards a deeper understanding of the components of transaction cost theory and resource-based theories and their extension towards explaining horizontal integration. The authors offer a combined perspective of the conditions under which a horizontal integration may create synergy and consequently influence the market and its rivals. It is the belief of the authors that the theoretical discussion and combined theory present an opportunity to extend both theories towards horizontal integration options and provide a starting point for future academic discussion. 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 7 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................. 7 1.2 Problem Formulation................................................................................................... 8 1.3 Thesis Approach .......................................................................................................... 9 1.3.1 Research Design ................................................................................................... 9 1.3.2 Case Approach ................................................................................................... 11 1.4 Scope and Limitations ............................................................................................... 18 2 Methodology..................................................................................................................... 20 2.1.1 The Concept of Paradigm .................................................................................. 20 2.2 Methodological Approaches ..................................................................................... 25 2.2.1 The Analytical View .......................................................................................... 25 2.2.2 The Systems View ............................................................................................. 27 2.2.3 The Actors View ................................................................................................ 29 2.2.4 Chosen Methodological View ............................................................................ 31 2.3 Research Methods ..................................................................................................... 33 2.3.1 Quantitative Research Methods ......................................................................... 33 2.3.2 Qualitative Research Methods ........................................................................... 39 2.3.3 Mixed Research Methods .................................................................................. 45 3 Theoretical Review ........................................................................................................... 49 3.1 Transaction Cost Theory ........................................................................................... 49 3.1.1 Definition and Theoretical Essence ................................................................... 49 3.1.2 Transaction Cost Theory Application and Theoretical Consistency ................. 54 3.1.3 Transaction Cost Theory and Systems View ..................................................... 59 3.2 Resource-based Theories of the Firm ........................................................................ 61 3.2.1 Definition and Theoretical Essence ................................................................... 62 3.2.2 Resource-based Theory of Competitive Advantage .......................................... 69 3.2.3 Resource-based Theory and Other Theories ...................................................... 69 3.2.4 Resource-based Theory and Systems View ....................................................... 73 3 3.3 Mergers & Acquisitions ............................................................................................ 75 3.3.1 Cooperation strategies – Integration
Load more

Recommended publications
  • World of Warcraft Online Manual
    Game Experience May Change During Online Play WOWz 9/11/04 4:02 PM Page 2 Copyright ©2004 by Blizzard Entertainment. All rights reserved. The use of this software product is subject to the terms of the enclosed End User License Agreement. You must accept the End User License Agreement before you can use the product. Use of World of Warcraft, is subject to your acceptance of the World of Warcraft® Terms of Use Agreement. World of Warcraft, Warcraft and Blizzard Entertainment are trademarks or registered trademarks of Blizzard Entertainment in the U.S. and/or other countries.Windows and DirectX are trademarks or registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the U.S. and/or other countries. Pentium is a registered trademark of Intel Corporation. Power Macintosh is a registered trademark of Apple Computer, Inc. Dolby and the double-D symbol are trademarks of Dolby Laboratory. Monotype is a trademark of Agfa Monotype Limited registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark ® Office and certain other jurisdictions. Arial is a trademark of The Monotype Corporation registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and certain other jurisdictions. ITC Friz Quadrata is a trademark of The International Typeface Corporation which may be registered in certain jurisdictions. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Uses high-quality DivX® Video. DivX® and the DivX® Video logo are trademarks of DivXNetworks, Inc. and are used under license. All rights reserved. AMD, the AMD logo, and combinations thereof are trademarks of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc All ATI product and product feature names and logos, including ATI, the ATI Logo, and RADEON are trademarks and / or registered trademarks of ATI Technologies Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Studio Showcase
    Contacts: Holly Rockwood Tricia Gugler EA Corporate Communications EA Investor Relations 650-628-7323 650-628-7327 [email protected] [email protected] EA SPOTLIGHTS SLATE OF NEW TITLES AND INITIATIVES AT ANNUAL SUMMER SHOWCASE EVENT REDWOOD CITY, Calif., August 14, 2008 -- Following an award-winning presence at E3 in July, Electronic Arts Inc. (NASDAQ: ERTS) today unveiled new games that will entertain the core and reach for more, scheduled to launch this holiday and in 2009. The new games presented on stage at a press conference during EA’s annual Studio Showcase include The Godfather® II, Need for Speed™ Undercover, SCRABBLE on the iPhone™ featuring WiFi play capability, and a brand new property, Henry Hatsworth in the Puzzling Adventure. EA Partners also announced publishing agreements with two of the world’s most creative independent studios, Epic Games and Grasshopper Manufacture. “Today’s event is a key inflection point that shows the industry the breadth and depth of EA’s portfolio,” said Jeff Karp, Senior Vice President and General Manager of North American Publishing for Electronic Arts. “We continue to raise the bar with each opportunity to show new titles throughout the summer and fall line up of global industry events. It’s been exciting to see consumer and critical reaction to our expansive slate, and we look forward to receiving feedback with the debut of today’s new titles.” The new titles and relationships unveiled on stage at today’s Studio Showcase press conference include: • Need for Speed Undercover – Need for Speed Undercover takes the franchise back to its roots and re-introduces break-neck cop chases, the world’s hottest cars and spectacular highway battles.
    [Show full text]
  • Marks Published for Opposition
    MARKS PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION The following marks are published in compliance with section 12(a) of the Trademark Act of 1946. Applications for the registration of marks in more than one class have been filed as provided in section 30 of said act as amended by Public Law 772, 87th Congress, approved Oct. 9, 1962, 76 Stat. 769. Opposition under section 13 may be filed within thirty days of the date of this publication. See rules 2.101 to 2.105. A separate fee of two hundred dollars for opposing each mark in each class must accompany the opposition. SECTION 1.— INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION The short titles associated below with the international class numbers are terms designed merely for quick identification and are not an official part of the international classification. The full names of international classes are given in section 6.1 of the trademark rules of practice. The designation ‘‘U.S. Cl.’’ appearing in this section refers to the U.S. class in effect prior to Sep. 1, 1973 rather than the international class which applies to applications filed on or after that date. For adoption of international classification see notice in the OFFICIAL GAZETTE of Jun. 26, 1973 (911 O.G. TM 210). Application in more than one class SN 75-163,780. BAUER NIKE HOCKEY INC., ST-JEROME, CLASS 28—TOYS AND SPORTING GOODS QUEBEC, CANADA, FILED 9-10-1996. FOR SPORTS ARTICLES AND REPLACEMENT PARTS THEREFOR, NAMELY, ICE SKATES, HOCKEY SKATES, ROLLER SKATES, IN-LINE ROLLER SKATES, ICE SKATE BLADES, IN-LINE SKATE CHASSIS, WHEELS, AND BRAKES; HOCKEY STICKS,
    [Show full text]
  • The Video Game Industry an Industry Analysis, from a VC Perspective
    The Video Game Industry An Industry Analysis, from a VC Perspective Nik Shah T’05 MBA Fellows Project March 11, 2005 Hanover, NH The Video Game Industry An Industry Analysis, from a VC Perspective Authors: Nik Shah • The video game industry is poised for significant growth, but [email protected] many sectors have already matured. Video games are a large and Tuck Class of 2005 growing market. However, within it, there are only selected portions that contain venture capital investment opportunities. Our analysis Charles Haigh [email protected] highlights these sectors, which are interesting for reasons including Tuck Class of 2005 significant technological change, high growth rates, new product development and lack of a clear market leader. • The opportunity lies in non-core products and services. We believe that the core hardware and game software markets are fairly mature and require intensive capital investment and strong technology knowledge for success. The best markets for investment are those that provide valuable new products and services to game developers, publishers and gamers themselves. These are the areas that will build out the industry as it undergoes significant growth. A Quick Snapshot of Our Identified Areas of Interest • Online Games and Platforms. Few online games have historically been venture funded and most are subject to the same “hit or miss” market adoption as console games, but as this segment grows, an opportunity for leading technology publishers and platforms will emerge. New developers will use these technologies to enable the faster and cheaper production of online games. The developers of new online games also present an opportunity as new methods of gameplay and game genres are explored.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Arts CEO John Riccitiello Leaving (Update) 18 March 2013, by Barbara Ortutay
    Electronic Arts CEO John Riccitiello leaving (Update) 18 March 2013, by Barbara Ortutay The company has named Larry Probst as executive chairman while it searches for Riccitiello's replacement. Probst has been chairman since 1994 and served as CEO from 1991 to 2007, when Riccitiello took over. "My decision to leave EA is really all about my accountability for the shortcomings in our financial results this year," Riccitiello wrote in a message to EA employees. "It currently looks like we will come in at the low end of, or slightly below, the financial guidance we issued to the Street, and we have fallen short of the internal operating plan we set one year ago. And for that, I am 100 percent accountable." EA and other traditional video game companies have been trying to adjust to a changing world where consumers are turning to mobile devices and cheap —or free— online games instead of buying expensive packaged titles. Electronic Arts reported adjusted revenue of $1.18 billion for the last three months of 2012, a 28 percent drop from the same period a year earlier. The figure was below Wall Street's expectations of $1.29 billion. This 2008 photo released by Electronic Arts shows Larry "John has worked hard to lead the company Probst in Redwood Shores, Calif. Video game publisher through challenging transitions in our industry, and Electronic Arts says its CEO, John Riccitiello, will step was instrumental in driving our very significant down on March 30. Electronic Arts Inc. said Monday that growth in digital revenues," Probst said in a it has named Larry Probst as executive chairman while it statement.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Top 5 Games Companies Went Global
    White paper How the Top 5 Games Companies Went Global Alpha St Andrew’s House St Andrew’s Road Every company had to start somewhere. Some were founded by a well-respected Cambridge CB4 1DL businessman or businesswoman and received a raft of initial investment. Others started United Kingdom out in somebody’s garage, and yet have still ended up dominating their market globally. @thisisalphalive In fact, there is a surprising correlation between the garage-start-up company and the names that have become global giants. That list includes Amazon, Apple, Disney and Google, and there are many more started in a one-person office. thisisalpha.com The question of how these companies have built from such small beginnings to positions of global dominance is a significant one. Other businesses at differing stages are keen to emulate them. There are, of course, many factors underlying such success. Great product is one; great business strategy another. But that isn’t enough to get you across continents. Successful global expansion comes down to effective localisation, and the top five global players can tell us a lot about undertaking the process correctly. The Best of the Best Let’s take the top five firms in the Games sector. It’s worth differentiating between the pure games developers or publishers and those who also provide hardware or other software, such as Sony, Nintendo and Microsoft. Much of the latter firms’ revenue comes from these other sources, so the top five games firms we will look at are the pure publishers and developers whose revenue is the highest.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Proxy Statement 1 Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
    Letter from our CEO and Incoming Board Chair Dear Fellow Stockholders, We hope that you and your families are well. During our fiscal year 2021, we navigated through the largest public health crisis of the last 100 years. We also participated in a number of important cultural conversations in our world. Through many challenges, we’re proud of how Electronic Arts delivered for our employees, players, communities, and stockholders in fiscal 2021, and positioned ourselves for continued growth and impact in the years ahead. We Executed our Strategic Priorities While Supporting our People Our management team acted swiftly and decisively through the year with a focus on the health and well-being of our workforce. Early in the pandemic, we directed our teams to work from home, suspended travel, and adopted new digital collaboration tools. Internal teams were formed to manage the response, we increased the frequency of our communications and employee surveys, and rolled out temporary benefit programs supporting our people and their families. While prioritizing the safety and wellbeing of our global workforce, we continued to execute against our strategic pillars. We launched 13 major games, including many that were supported by robust live services, and led the way with innovative games for a new generation of consoles. We added tens of millions of new players to our global network, and we scaled our subscription offering to new platforms. We also completed three acquisitions to complement our strategy and contribute to future growth. In delivering these achievements, we significantly exceeded our initial revenue, net bookings, and operating cash flow guidance for the fiscal year.
    [Show full text]
  • Ea Reports Record Fiscal Year Results
    EA REPORTS SECOND QUARTER FISCAL 2007 RESULTS Q2 Net Revenue a Record $784 Million Driven by EA SPORTS Titles Need for Speed Carbon Debuts on 10 Platforms REDWOOD CITY, CA – November 2, 2006 – Electronic Arts (NASDAQ: ERTS) today announced preliminary financial results for its fiscal second quarter ended September 30, 2006. Fiscal Second Quarter Results Net revenue for the second quarter was $784 million, up 16 percent as compared with $675 million for the prior year. Sales were driven primarily by Madden NFL 07, NCAA® Football 07, FIFA 07, NBA Live 07 and catalog titles. Gross profit for the quarter was $445 million, up 14 percent year-over-year. Net income for the quarter was $22 million as compared with $51 million for the prior year. The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R “Share-Based Payment” at the beginning of its fiscal year resulting in pre-tax stock-based compensation charges of $33 million in the second quarter. Diluted earnings per share were $0.07 as compared with $0.16 for the prior year. Non-GAAP net income was $65 million as compared with $46 million a year ago – an increase of 41 percent year-over-year. Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share were $0.21 as compared with $0.15 for the prior year. (Please see Non-GAAP Financial Measures and reconciliation information included in this release.) Trailing twelve month operating cash flow was $571 million as compared with $592 million a year ago. The Company ended the quarter with cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $2.4 billion.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Financial Report and Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the Year Ended December 31, 2008 Tuesday March 03, 2009
    Annual Financial Report and Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the Year Ended December 31, 2008 Tuesday March 03, 2009 VIVENDI Société anonyme with a Management Board and Supervisory Board with a share capital of €6,436,133,182 Head Office: 42 avenue de Friedland – 75380 PARIS CEDEX 08 – FRANCE IMPORTANT NOTICE: READERS ARE STRONGLY ADVISED TO READ THE IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS AT THE END OF THIS FINANCIAL REPORT. Annual Financial Report and Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the Year Ended December 31, 2008 Vivendi /2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Tuesday March 03, 2009 SELECTED KEY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA.........................................................................................................................................5 I – 2008 FINANCIAL REPORT ................................................................................................................................................................................6 SUMMARY OF THE 2008, 2007 AND 2006 MAIN DEVELOPMENTS................................................................................................................6 1 2008 MAIN DEVELOPMENTS......................................................................................................................................................................7 1.1 MAIN DEVELOPMENTS IN 2008 .......................................................................................................................................................................7 1.2 MAIN DEVELOPMENTS SINCE DECEMBER
    [Show full text]
  • Activision Announces Partnership with Metallica for First Ever
    Activision Announces Partnership with Metallica for First Ever Simultaneous Release of New Record "Death Magnetic" in Stores and for Download in Guitar Hero® Video Game Company Confirms Upcoming Game Lineup and Announces Five New Titles Santa Monica, CA – July 15, 2007 – Activision Publishing (Nasdaq: ATVI) today revealed that Metallica's highly-anticipated full studio album, "Death Magnetic," will be available simultaneously in record stores and as downloadable content for the world's best-selling rhythm-based video game series, Guitar Hero®. Metallica fans will be able to rock out to new anthems from the band in Guitar Hero® III: Legends of Rock this September and will be able to unite on drums, guitar and vocals as the album will also be released as downloadable content for Guitar Hero® World Tour when it ships this Fall. The company also confirmed its upcoming game slate and announced five new titles in development. Activision's fall 2008 game lineup includes Call of Duty®: World at War, Guitar Hero® World Tour, Quantum of Solace™ and Spider-Man™: Web of Shadows. In addition, the company announced that it is currently in development on Wolfenstein™, the highly anticipated title from id Software and Raven Software; Marvel™ Ultimate Alliance 2: Fusion by Vicarious Visions, the sequel to one of the best- selling action RPGs; Singularity (Working Title), a first person action game, based on an all-new wholly owned intellectual property, from Raven Software; ; a Luxoflux game based on "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" from DreamWorks Pictures and Paramount Pictures, in association with Hasbro, the follow-up to one of 2007's biggest blockbuster movies and games; and a title based on Twentieth Century Fox/Marvel's X-Men Origins: Wolverine in development at Raven Software.
    [Show full text]
  • GAME DEVELOPERS a One-Of-A-Kind Game Concept, an Instantly Recognizable Character, a Clever Phrase— These Are All a Game Developer’S Most Valuable Assets
    HOLLYWOOD >> REVIEWS ALIAS MAYA 6 * RTZEN RT/SHADER ISSUE AUGUST 2004 THE LEADING GAME INDUSTRY MAGAZINE >>SIGGRAPH 2004 >>DEVELOPER DEFENSE >>FAST RADIOSITY SNEAK PEEK: LEGAL TOOLS TO SPEEDING UP LIGHTMAPS DISCREET 3DS MAX 7 PROTECT YOUR I.P. WITH PIXEL SHADERS POSTMORTEM: THE CINEMATIC EFFECT OF ZOMBIE STUDIOS’ SHADOW OPS: RED MERCURY []CONTENTS AUGUST 2004 VOLUME 11, NUMBER 7 FEATURES 14 COPYRIGHT: THE BIG GUN FOR GAME DEVELOPERS A one-of-a-kind game concept, an instantly recognizable character, a clever phrase— these are all a game developer’s most valuable assets. To protect such intangible properties from pirates, you’ll need to bring out the big gun—copyright. Here’s some free advice from a lawyer. By S. Gregory Boyd 20 FAST RADIOSITY: USING PIXEL SHADERS 14 With the latest advances in hardware, GPU, 34 and graphics technology, it’s time to take another look at lightmapping, the divine art of illuminating a digital environment. By Brian Ramage 20 POSTMORTEM 30 FROM BUNGIE TO WIDELOAD, SEROPIAN’S BEAT GOES ON 34 THE CINEMATIC EFFECT OF ZOMBIE STUDIOS’ A decade ago, Alexander Seropian founded a SHADOW OPS: RED MERCURY one-man company called Bungie, the studio that would eventually give us MYTH, ONI, and How do you give a player that vicarious presence in an imaginary HALO. Now, after his departure from Bungie, environment—that “you-are-there” feeling that a good movie often gives? he’s trying to repeat history by starting a new Zombie’s answer was to adopt many of the standard movie production studio: Wideload Games.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Financial Report and Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the Year Ended December 31, 2007
    Annual Financial Report and Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the Year ended December 31, 2007 VIVENDI Société anonyme with a Management Board and Supervisory Board with a share capital of €6,406,087,710.00 Head Office: 42 avenue de Friedland – 75380 PARIS CEDEX 08 – FRANCE IMPORTANT NOTICE: READERS ARE STRONGLY ADVISED TO READ THE IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS AT THE END OF THIS FINANCIAL REPORT. Annual Financial Report and Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the Year Ended December 31, 2007 Vivendi /2 TABLE OF CONTENTS SELECTED KEY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA........................................................................................................................................6 I – 2007 FINANCIAL REPORT ...............................................................................................................................................................................7 1 MAIN DEVELOPMENTS..............................................................................................................................................................................8 1.1 MAIN DEVELOPMENTS IN 2007......................................................................................................................................................................8 1.2 MAIN DEVELOPMENTS SINCE DECEMBER 31, 2007 ........................................................................................................................................11 1.3 TRANSACTIONS UNDERWAY AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2007 .................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]