Magnetic Confinement of Charged Particles

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Magnetic Confinement of Charged Particles Magnetic confinement of charged particles Thomas Sunn Pedersen Max-Planck Institute for Plasma Physics and University of Greifswald, Germany Overview •Motivation for studying single particle orbits in magnetic fields •Motion in a straight uniform B-field (basic review) •The guiding center approximation •Motion including a static electric field, or gravity •Motion in inhomogeneous and bent B-fields and the first adiabatic invariant •Mirror confinement •Time variation (no derivation) Lecture on guiding center approximation 2 The need for magnetic field confinement •The easiest fusion process to reach is D-T fusion •This requires particle kinetic energies in the range 10-100 keV •Even at the particle energy of peak D-T fusion reactivity, non-fusion collisions (scattering) dominate over the fusion collisions By two orders of magnitude •Must confine plasma at T>10 keV (~120 M Kelvin) for many collisions •Thermal speed of D and T is on the order of 106 m/s at these temperatures (and even higher for electrons) – μs confinement if you have no confining field? •Electric fields alone won’t work: Confine only one species •Magnetic fields may work (must Be Bent!) •Gravity works on the sun, But not on Earth Lecture on guiding center approximation 3 Charged particle motion in a straight magnetic field •A charged particle performs a screw-like path if it is confined by a straight uniform magnetic field and it feels no other forces •Start with Newton’s 2nd law and the Lorentz force: F = ma = qv × B B B zˆ = 0 € Lecture on guiding center approximation 4 Charged particle motion in a straight magnetic field •Newton’s 2nd law written coordinate by coordinate: F = ma = qv × B ⇒ dv qB x = 0 v dt m y dv qB y = − 0 v dt m x dv z = 0 dt € Lecture on guiding center approximation 5 Charged particle motion in a straight magnetic field •Newton’s 2nd law written coordinate by coordinate: •qB0/m is an inverse time scale dv qB x = 0 v dt m y dv qB y = − 0 v dt m x dv z = 0 dt € Lecture on guiding center approximation 6 Charged particle motion in a straight magnetic field •qB0/m is an inverse time scale: give it it’s own symbol dv x = ω v dt c y dv y = −ω v dt c x dv z = 0 dt qB q B ω = 0 - sometimes ω = 0 c m c m Lecture on guiding center approximation 7 € Charged particle motion in a straight magnetic field •Decouple vx and vy equations: d # dv & x = ω v dt $% dt c y '( dv y = −ω v dt c x dv z = 0 dt qB q B ω = 0 - sometimes ω = 0 c m c m Lecture on guiding center approximation 8 € Charged particle motion in a straight magnetic field •Eliminate vy from vx equation by differentiation and substitution •Vz equation is trivial 2 $ d vx dvy 2 2 = ω c & dt dt d vx 2 % ⇒ 2 = −ω cvx dvy dt = −ω v & dt c x ' dv z = 0 ⇒ v = constant = v dt z || qB ω 2 = ( 0 )2 c m Lecture on guiding center approximation 9 € Charged particle motion in a straight magnetic field •Eliminate vy from vx equation by differentiation and substitution: " dvx = ωcvy $ 2 dt $ d vx 2 # ⇒ 2 = −ωc vx dvy $ dt = −ωcvx dt %$ •We recognize the simple harmonic oscillator for vx •Find vy by differentiation •Vz equation is trivial: dv z = 0 ⇒ v = constant=v dt z || 2 qB0 2 ωc = ( ) Lecturem on guiding center approximation 10 Charged particle motion in a straight magnetic field •Eliminate vy from vx equation by differentiation and substitution: dv " d 2v x = ω v $ x = −ω 2v dt c y $ dt 2 c x # ⇒ dvy $ 1 dvx = −ω v vy = c x $ dt % ωc dt •We recognize the simple harmonic oscillator for vx •Find vy by differentiation •Vz equation is trivial: dv z = 0 ⇒ v = constant=v dt z || 2 qB0 2 ωc = ( ) Lecturem on guiding center approximation 11 Charged particle motion in a straight magnetic field •Velocity components: vx = v⊥cos(ω ct +δ) vy = −v⊥sin(ω ct +δ) vz = v|| qB ω 2 = ( 0 )2 c m •Next step: integrate to get position € Lecture on guiding center approximation 12 Charged particle motion in a straight magnetic field •Integrate in time to get position •Define Larmor radius and guiding center: v⊥ vx = v⊥ cos(ωct +δ) ⇒ x = xgc + sin(ωct +δ) ωc v⊥ vy = −v⊥ sin(ωct +δ) ⇒ y = ygc + cos(ωct +δ) ωc vz =v|| ⇒ z = z0 +v||t qB ω = 0 (cyclotron frequency), f = ω / 2π c m c c v⊥ mv⊥ rL = = (Larmor radius, gyroradius) ωc qB0 Lecture on guiding center approximation 13 The guiding center approximation: •If the Larmor radius is on the order of the size of the confining field, then only collisionless orbits are confined: •After a collision, the particle will have a new guiding center, about one Larmor radius away from the original guiding center •If this new Larmor orbit intersects material walls or extends to regions of much lower B-field, the particle is not confined •In order to confine charged particles magnetically for many collision times, the Larmor radius must be small! •When the Larmor radius is small, and the cyclotron frequency is large: • one can derive analytic formulas for the time evolution of the guiding center (xgc, ygc, z), averaging over the gyration ∂B 1 r << B / ∇B and ω >> (*) L c ∂t B Lecture on guiding center approximation 14 The guiding center approximation is often necessary: •For a 1 eV electron in a B=1 T field, the cyclotron frequency is large and the Larmor radius small: 11 −1 ω c ≈1.8 ×10 s −6 rL ≈ 3 ×10 m •Just to follow the electron for one microsecond requires >106 time steps if a simple numerical scheme is used. •Almost the full computational€ effort is spent calculating the circular motion…. •Averaging over the gyromotion allows fast and accurate calculations of the motion of charged particles in a magnetic field, both analytic and numerical •Essentially, the gyrating particle is replaced by a charged (q), massive (m) ring of current (I=eωc/2π) , with its center at the particle’s gyrocenter. •We will do this for a few important cases in the following: Lecture on guiding center approximation 15 ExB drift •Since particles are charged, the electric field naturally enters the equations (collective phenomena, external confining fields, single particle Coulomb interactions) •Electric field component along B gives simple acceleration or deceleration •Electric field component perpendicular to B is more interesting: v⊥ •Example below: Electron rL = ωc Lecture on guiding center approximation 16 ExB drift •Net effect is a motion in the ExB direction which has a steady state component •Let’s calculate this drift: Lecture on guiding center approximation 17 ExB drift •Newton’s 2nd law written coordinate by coordinate (again) •Let’s add an electric field now dv qB x = 0 v dt m y dv qB y = − 0 v dt m x dv z = 0 dt € Lecture on guiding center approximation 18 ExB drift dv qB x = 0 v dt m y dv qB q y = − 0 v + E dt m x m y dv z = 0 dt € Lecture on guiding center approximation 19 ExB drift •Ey/B0 is a velocity, vE; it is constant since we assumed E and B constant. dv qB x = 0 v dt m y dvy qB0 Ey = − (vx − ) dt m B0 dv z = 0 dt Lecture on guiding center approximation 20 ExB drift •Ey/B0 is a velocity, vE; it is constant since we assumed E and B constant. dv qB x = 0 v dt m y dv qB y = − 0 (v − v ) dt m x E dv z = 0 dt Lecture on guiding center approximation 21 ExB drift •E/B is a velocity, vE; it is constant since we assumed E and B constant. •Since vE is constant, we can subtract it inside the d/dt of x-equation d(v − v ) qB x E = 0 v dt m y dv qB y = − 0 (v − v ) dt m x E dv z = 0 dt Lecture on guiding center approximation 22 ExB drift •E/B is a velocity, vE; it is constant since we assumed E and B constant. •Since vE is constant, we can subtract it inside the d/dt of x-equation d(v − v ) qB x E = 0 v dt m y dv qB y = − 0 (v − v ) dt m x E dv z = 0 dt Now € Lecture on guiding center approximation 23 ExB drift •E/B is a velocity, vE; it is constant since we assumed E and B constant. •Since vE is constant, we can subtract it inside the d/dt of x-equation d(vx − vE ) qB0 dvx qB0 = vy = v dt m dt m y dvy qB0 dvy qB0 = − (vx − vE ) = − v dt m dt m x dvz dv = 0 z = 0 dt dt Now Before € Lecture on guiding center approximation 24 ExB drift •It’s clear we have the same equation as before, just replacing vx by vx-vE d(vx − vE ) qB0 dvx qB0 = vy = v dt m dt m y dvy qB0 dvy qB0 = − (vx − vE ) = − v dt m dt m x dvz dv = 0 z = 0 dt dt Now Before € Lecture on guiding center approximation 25 ExB drift •It’s clear we have the same equation as before, just replacing vx by vx-vE vx − vE = v⊥ cos(ωct +δ) vx = v⊥cos(ω ct +δ) vy = −v⊥ sin(ωct +δ) vy = −v⊥sin(ω ct +δ) vz = v|| vz = v|| qB qB ω 2 = ( 0 )2 ω 2 = ( 0 )2 c m c m Now Before Lecture€ on guiding center approximation 26 ExB drift •It’s clear we have the same equation as before, just replacing vx by vx-vE v v cos( t ) vx = vE + v⊥cos(ω ct +δ) x = ⊥ ω c +δ v v sin( t ) vy = −v⊥sin(ω ct +δ) y = − ⊥ ω c +δ vz = v|| vz = v|| 2 qB0 2 2 qB0 2 ω = ( ) ω c = ( ) c m m Now Before € Lecture€ on guiding center approximation 27 ExB drift •It’s clear we have the same equation as before, just replacing vx by vx-vE v v cos( t ) vx = vE + v⊥cos(ω ct +δ) x = ⊥ ω c +δ v v sin( t ) vy = −v⊥sin(ω ct +δ) y = − ⊥ ω c +δ vz = v|| vz = v|| 2 qB0 2 2 qB0 2 ω = ( ) ω c = ( ) c m m Now Before € Lecture€ on guiding center approximation 28 ExB drift •It’s clear we have the same equation as before, just replacing vx by vx-vE Ey vx = + v⊥ cos(ωct +δ) vx = v⊥cos(ω ct +δ) B0 vy = −v⊥sin(ω ct +δ) vy = −v⊥ sin(ωct +δ) vz = v|| vz = v|| 2 qB0 2 qB ω c = ( ) ω 2 = ( 0 )2 m c m Now Before Lecture€ on guiding center approximation 29 ExB drift: Coordinate-free formulation •For situations with constant uniform E and B fields, we can always define a local coordinate system where z is in the B-field direction and y is in the direction of the component of E perpendicular to B; hence, our derivation is valid in any coordinate system.
Recommended publications
  • Particle Motion
    Physics of fusion power Lecture 5: particle motion Gyro motion The Lorentz force leads to a gyration of the particles around the magnetic field We will write the motion as The Lorentz force leads to a gyration of the charged particles Parallel and rapid gyro-motion around the field line Typical values For 10 keV and B = 5T. The Larmor radius of the Deuterium ions is around 4 mm for the electrons around 0.07 mm Note that the alpha particles have an energy of 3.5 MeV and consequently a Larmor radius of 5.4 cm Typical values of the cyclotron frequency are 80 MHz for Hydrogen and 130 GHz for the electrons Often the frequency is much larger than that of the physics processes of interest. One can average over time One can not however neglect the finite Larmor radius since it lead to specific effects (although it is small) Additional Force F Consider now a finite additional force F For the parallel motion this leads to a trivial acceleration Perpendicular motion: The equation above is a linear ordinary differential equation for the velocity. The gyro-motion is the homogeneous solution. The inhomogeneous solution Drift velocity Inhomogeneous solution Solution of the equation Physical picture of the drift The force accelerates the particle leading to a higher velocity The higher velocity however means a larger Larmor radius The circular orbit no longer closes on itself A drift results. Physics picture behind the drift velocity FxB Electric field Using the formula And the force due to the electric field One directly obtains the so-called ExB velocity Note this drift is independent of the charge as well as the mass of the particles Electric field that depends on time If the electric field depends on time, an additional drift appears Polarization drift.
    [Show full text]
  • 19-8 Magnetic Field from Loops and Coils
    Answer to Essential Question 19.7: To get a net magnetic field of zero, the two fields must point in opposite directions. This happens only along the straight line that passes through the wires, in between the wires. The current in wire 1 is three times larger than that in wire 2, so the point where the net magnetic field is zero is three times farther from wire 1 than from wire 2. This point is 30 cm to the right of wire 1 and 10 cm to the left of wire 2. 19-8 Magnetic Field from Loops and Coils The Magnetic Field from a Current Loop Let’s take a straight current-carrying wire and bend it into a complete circle. As shown in Figure 19.27, the field lines pass through the loop in one direction and wrap around outside the loop so the lines are continuous. The field is strongest near the wire. For a loop of radius R and current I, the magnetic field in the exact center of the loop has a magnitude of . (Equation 19.11: The magnetic field at the center of a current loop) The direction of the loop’s magnetic field can be found by the same right-hand rule we used for the long straight wire. Point the thumb of your right hand in the direction of the current flow along a particular segment of the loop. When you curl your fingers, they curl the way the magnetic field lines curl near that segment. The roles of the fingers and thumb can be reversed: if you curl the fingers on Figure 19.27: (a) A side view of the magnetic field your right hand in the way the current goes around from a current loop.
    [Show full text]
  • [Insert Your Title Here]
    Laboratory Investigation of the Dynamics of Shear Flows in a Plasma Boundary Layer by Ami Marie DuBois A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama December 14, 2013 Copyright 2013 by Ami Marie DuBois Approved by Edward Thomas, Jr., Chair, Professor of Physics William Amatucci, Staff Scientist at Naval Research Laboratory Uwe Konopka, Professor of Physics David Maurer, Professor of Physics Abstract The laboratory experiments presented in this dissertation investigate a regime of instabilities that occur when a highly localized, radial electric field oriented perpendicular to a uniform background magnetic field gives rise to an azimuthal velocity shear profile at the boundary between two interpenetrating plasmas. This investigation is motivated by theoretical predictions which state that plasmas are unstable to transverse and parallel inhomogeneous sheared flows over a very broad frequency range. Shear driven instabilities are commonly observed in the near-Earth space environment when boundary layers, such as the magnetopause and the plasma sheet boundary layer, are compressed by intense solar storms. When the shear scale length is much less than the ion gyro- radius, but greater than the electron gyro-radius, the electrons are magnetized in the shear layer, but the ions are effectively un-magnetized. The resulting shear driven instability, the electron-ion hybrid instability, is investigated in a new interpenetrating plasma configuration in the Auburn Linear EXperiment for Instability Studied (ALEXIS) in the absence of a magnetic field aligned current. In order to truly understand the dynamics at magnetospheric boundary layers, the EIH instability is studied in the presence of a density gradient located at the boundary layer between two plasmas.
    [Show full text]
  • Principle and Characteristic of Lorentz Force Propeller
    J. Electromagnetic Analysis & Applications, 2009, 1: 229-235 229 doi:10.4236/jemaa.2009.14034 Published Online December 2009 (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/jemaa) Principle and Characteristic of Lorentz Force Propeller Jing ZHU Northwest Polytechnical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China. Email: [email protected] Received August 4th, 2009; revised September 1st, 2009; accepted September 9th, 2009. ABSTRACT This paper analyzes two methods that a magnetic field can be generated, and classifies them under two types: 1) Self-field: a magnetic field can be generated by electrically charged particles move, and its characteristic is that it can’t be independent of the electrically charged particles. 2) Radiation field: a magnetic field can be generated by electric field change, and its characteristic is that it independently exists. Lorentz Force Propeller (ab. LFP) utilize the charac- teristic that radiation magnetic field independently exists. The carrier of the moving electrically charged particles and the device generating the changing electric field are fixed together to form a system. When the moving electrically charged particles under the action of the Lorentz force in the radiation magnetic field, the system achieves propulsion. Same as rocket engine, the LFP achieves propulsion in vacuum. LFP can generate propulsive force only by electric energy and no propellant is required. The main disadvantage of LFP is that the ratio of propulsive force to weight is small. Keywords: Electric Field, Magnetic Field, Self-Field, Radiation Field, the Lorentz Force 1. Introduction also due to the changes in observation angle.) “If the electric quantity carried by the particles is certain, the The magnetic field generated by a changing electric field magnetic field generated by the particles is entirely de- is a kind of radiation field and it independently exists.
    [Show full text]
  • View Technical Report
    CH9700652 LRP 581/97 August 1997 Global approach to the spectral problem of MICROINSTABILITIES IN TOKAMAK PLASMAS USING A GYROKINETIC MODEL S. Brunner CRPP Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE Association Euratom - Confederation Suisse FEDERALE DE LAUSANNE Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas (CRPP) Association Euratom - Confederation Suisse Ecole Poly technique Federate de Lausanne PPB, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland phone: +41 21 693 34 82 17 —fax +41 21 693 51 76 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas - Technologle de la Fusion (CRPP-TF) Association Euratom - Confederation Suisse Ecole Poly technique Federate de Lausanne CH-5232 Vllligen-PSI, Switzerland phone: +41 56 310 32 59 —fax +41 56 310 37 29 LRP 581/97 August 1997 Global approach to the spectral problem of MICROINSTABILITIES IN TOKAMAK PLASMAS USING A GYROKINET1C MODEL S. Brunner EPFL 1997 Abstract Ion temperature gradient (ITG) -related instabilities are studied in tokamak-like plas ­ mas with the help of a new global eigenvalue code. Ions are modeled in the frame of gyrokinetic theory so that finite Larmor radius effects of these particles are retained to all orders. Non-adiabatic trapped electron dynamics is taken into account through the bounce-averaged drift kinetic equation. Assuming electrostatic perturbations, the sys­ tem is closed with the quasineutrality relation. Practical methods are presented which make this global approach feasible. These include a non-standard wave decomposition compatible with the curved geometry as well as adapting an efficient root finding al­ gorithm for computing the unstable spectrum. These techniques are applied to a low pressure configuration given by a large aspect ratio torus with circular, concentric mag­ netic surfaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics 2102 Lecture 2
    Physics 2102 Jonathan Dowling PPhhyyssicicss 22110022 LLeeccttuurree 22 Charles-Augustin de Coulomb EElleeccttrriicc FFiieellddss (1736-1806) January 17, 07 Version: 1/17/07 WWhhaatt aarree wwee ggooiinngg ttoo lleeaarrnn?? AA rrooaadd mmaapp • Electric charge Electric force on other electric charges Electric field, and electric potential • Moving electric charges : current • Electronic circuit components: batteries, resistors, capacitors • Electric currents Magnetic field Magnetic force on moving charges • Time-varying magnetic field Electric Field • More circuit components: inductors. • Electromagnetic waves light waves • Geometrical Optics (light rays). • Physical optics (light waves) CoulombCoulomb’’ss lawlaw +q1 F12 F21 !q2 r12 For charges in a k | q || q | VACUUM | F | 1 2 12 = 2 2 N m r k = 8.99 !109 12 C 2 Often, we write k as: 2 1 !12 C k = with #0 = 8.85"10 2 4$#0 N m EEleleccttrricic FFieieldldss • Electric field E at some point in space is defined as the force experienced by an imaginary point charge of +1 C, divided by Electric field of a point charge 1 C. • Note that E is a VECTOR. +1 C • Since E is the force per unit q charge, it is measured in units of E N/C. • We measure the electric field R using very small “test charges”, and dividing the measured force k | q | by the magnitude of the charge. | E |= R2 SSuuppeerrppoossititioionn • Question: How do we figure out the field due to several point charges? • Answer: consider one charge at a time, calculate the field (a vector!) produced by each charge, and then add all the vectors! (“superposition”) • Useful to look out for SYMMETRY to simplify calculations! Example Total electric field +q -2q • 4 charges are placed at the corners of a square as shown.
    [Show full text]
  • Partially Ionized Plasmas in Astrophysics
    Space Sci Rev (2018) 214:58 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-018-0485-6 Partially Ionized Plasmas in Astrophysics José Luis Ballester1 · Igor Alexeev2 · Manuel Collados3 · Turlough Downes4 · Robert F. Pfaff5 · Holly Gilbert6 · Maxim Khodachenko7 · Elena Khomenko3 · Ildar F. Shaikhislamov8 · Roberto Soler1 · Enrique Vázquez-Semadeni9 · Teimuraz Zaqarashvili7,10 Received: 29 June 2017 / Accepted: 2 February 2018 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Partially ionized plasmas are found across the Universe in many different as- trophysical environments. They constitute an essential ingredient of the solar atmosphere, molecular clouds, planetary ionospheres and protoplanetary disks, among other environ- ments, and display a richness of physical effects which are not present in fully ionized plasmas. This review provides an overview of the physics of partially ionized plasmas, in- cluding recent advances in different astrophysical areas in which partial ionization plays a B J.L. Ballester [email protected] I. Alexeev [email protected] M. Collados [email protected] T. Downes [email protected] R.F. Pfaff [email protected] H. Gilbert [email protected] M. Khodachenko [email protected] E. Khomenko [email protected] I.F. Shaikhislamov [email protected] R. Soler [email protected] E. Vázquez-Semadeni [email protected] T. Zaqarashvili [email protected] 58 Page 2 of 149 J.L. Ballester et al. fundamental role. We outline outstanding observational and theoretical questions and dis- cuss possible directions for future progress. Keywords Plasmas · Magnetohydrodynamics · Sun · Molecular clouds · Ionospheres · Exoplanets 1 Introduction Plasma pervades the Universe at all scales, and the term plasma universe was coined by Hannes Alfvén to point out the important role played by plasmas across the universe (Alfven 1986).
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of the Electron Diffusion Region in Magnetic Reconnection with Small Guide Fields
    Structure of the electron diffusion region in magnetic reconnection with small guide fields MASSA0HU- by Jonathan Ng JAN I Submitted to the Department of Physics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Physics at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2012 @ Jonathan Ng, MMXII. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Author ............ Department of Physics May 11, 2012 / / Certified by..... *2) Jan Egedal-Pedersen Associate Professor of Physics Thesis Supervisor Accepted by ...... .............. ........ ............. ... Nergis Mavalvala Senior Thesis Coordinator, Department of Physics 2 Structure of the electron diffusion region in magnetic reconnection with small guide fields by Jonathan Ng Submitted to the Department of Physics on May 11, 2012, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Physics Abstract Observations in the Earth's magnetotail and kinetic simulations of magnetic reconnec- tion have shown high electron pressure anisotropy in the inflow of electron diffusion regions. This anisotropy has been accurately accounted for in a new fluid closure for collisionless reconnection. By tracing electron orbits in the fields taken from particle-in-cell simulations, the electron distribution function in the diffusion region is reconstructed at enhanced resolutions. For antiparallel reconnection, this reveals its highly structured nature, with striations corresponding to the number of times an electron has been reflected within the region, and exposes the origin of gradients in the electron pressure tensor important for momentum balance. The addition of a guide field changes the nature of the electron distributions, and the differences are accounted for by studying the motion of single particles in the field geometry.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Line Motion in Classical Electromagnetism John W
    Field line motion in classical electromagnetism John W. Belchera) and Stanislaw Olbert Department of Physics and Center for Educational Computing Initiatives, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 ͑Received 15 June 2001; accepted 30 October 2002͒ We consider the concept of field line motion in classical electromagnetism for crossed electromagnetic fields and suggest definitions for this motion that are physically meaningful but not unique. Our choice has the attractive feature that the local motion of the field lines is in the direction of the Poynting vector. The animation of the field line motion using our approach reinforces Faraday’s insights into the connection between the shape of the electromagnetic field lines and their dynamical effects. We give examples of these animations, which are available on the Web. © 2003 American Association of Physics Teachers. ͓DOI: 10.1119/1.1531577͔ I. INTRODUCTION meaning.10,11 This skepticism is in part due to the fact that there is no unique way to define the motion of field lines. Classical electromagnetism is a difficult subject for begin- Nevertheless, the concept has become an accepted and useful ning students. This difficulty is due in part to the complexity one in space plasma physics.12–14 In this paper we focus on a of the underlying mathematics which obscures the physics.1 particular definition of the velocity of electric and magnetic The standard introductory approach also does little to con- field lines that is useful in quasi-static situations in which the nect the dynamics of electromagnetism to the everyday ex- E and B fields are mutually perpendicular.
    [Show full text]
  • Electromagnetic Fields and Energy
    MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu Haus, Hermann A., and James R. Melcher. Electromagnetic Fields and Energy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1989. ISBN: 9780132490207. Please use the following citation format: Haus, Hermann A., and James R. Melcher, Electromagnetic Fields and Energy. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology: MIT OpenCourseWare). http://ocw.mit.edu (accessed [Date]). License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike. Also available from Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989. ISBN: 9780132490207. Note: Please use the actual date you accessed this material in your citation. For more information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms 9 MAGNETIZATION 9.0 INTRODUCTION The sources of the magnetic fields considered in Chap. 8 were conduction currents associated with the motion of unpaired charge carriers through materials. Typically, the current was in a metal and the carriers were conduction electrons. In this chapter, we recognize that materials provide still other magnetic field sources. These account for the fields of permanent magnets and for the increase in inductance produced in a coil by insertion of a magnetizable material. Magnetization effects are due to the propensity of the atomic constituents of matter to behave as magnetic dipoles. It is natural to think of electrons circulating around a nucleus as comprising a circulating current, and hence giving rise to a magnetic moment similar to that for a current loop, as discussed in Example 8.3.2. More surprising is the magnetic dipole moment found for individual electrons. This moment, associated with the electronic property of spin, is defined as the Bohr magneton e 1 m = ± ¯h (1) e m 2 11 where e/m is the electronic charge­to­mass ratio, 1.76 × 10 coulomb/kg, and 2π¯h −34 2 is Planck’s constant, ¯h = 1.05 × 10 joule­sec so that me has the units A − m .
    [Show full text]
  • Field Lines Electric Flux Recall That We Defined the Electric Field to Be the Force Per Unit Charge at a Particular Point
    Gauss’ Law Field Lines Electric Flux Recall that we defined the electric field to be the force per unit charge at a particular point: P For a source point charge Q and a test charge q at point P q Q at P If Q is positive, then the field is directed radially away from the charge. + Note: direction of arrows Note: spacing of lines Note: straight lines If Q is negative, then the field is directed radially towards the charge. - Negative Q implies anti-parallel to Note: direction of arrows Note: spacing of lines Note: straight lines + + Field lines were introduced by Michael Faraday to help visualize the direction and magnitude of the electric field. The direction of the field at any point is given by the direction of the field line, while the magnitude of the field is given qualitatively by the density of field lines. In the above diagrams, the simplest examples are given where the field is spherically symmetric. The direction of the field is apparent in the figures. At a point charge, field lines converge so that their density is large - the density scales in proportion to the inverse of the distance squared, as does the field. As is apparent in the diagrams, field lines start on positive charges and end on negative charges. This is all convention, but it nonetheless useful to remember. - + This figure portrays several useful concepts. For example, near the point charges (that is, at a distance that is small compared to their separation), the field becomes spherically symmetric. This makes sense - near a charge, the field from that one charge certainly should dominate the net electric field since it is so large.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetic Fields, Magnetic Forces, and Sources of Magnetic Fields
    Magnetic Fields, Magnetic Forces, and Sources of Magnetic Fields W07D2 1 Announcements Problem Set 6 Due Thursday at 9 pm .This problem set is an introduction to Experiment 1 and the two problems from W06D2. Week 8 LS1 due Mon at 8:30 am Week 8 LS2 due Mon at 8:30 am Week 8 LS3 due Wed at 8:30 am Week 8 LS4 due Wed at 8:30 am 2 Outline Magnetic Field Lorentz Force Law Magnetic Force on Current Carrying Wire Sources of Magnetic Fields Biot-Savart Law 3 Magnetic Field of the Earth North magnetic pole located in southern hemisphere http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtDAOxaJ4Ms 4 Magnetic Force on Moving Charges Force on ! ! positive charge B ! Fq = qvq × B vq B B q vq F F q q B q + B Force on negative charge Magnetic force is perpendicular to both velocity of the charge and magnetic field 5 CQ: Cross Product and Magnetic Force An electron is traveling up in a magnetic field that points to the right. What is the direction of the force on the electron? v 1. Up. q 2. Down. B 3. Left. q = e 4. Right. 5. Into plane of figure. 6. Out of plane of figure. 6 Group Problem: Cyclotron Motion A positively charged particle vq with charge +q and mass m is B moving with speed v in a + uniform magnetic field of + q magnitude B directed into the plane of figure will undergo circular motion. Find (1) the radius R of the orbit, (2) the period T of the motion, (3) the angular frequency ω.
    [Show full text]