Broughton and Old Dalby Parish Neighbourhood Plan
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Village Newsletter for Hickling and Hickling Pastures
The Village Newsletter for Hickling and Hickling Pastures 5th e-issue February - March 2021 44 Hickling Local History1 Group Hickling Village Newsletter - Committee Chair; Tim McEwen - Tel. 822834 or [email protected]) Treasurer/Advertising; Andrew Terry } Tel. 822088 or Copy & Secretary; Maggy Jordan } [email protected] Copy Collection; Jane Fraser - Tel. 822845 Please get in touch with any of us if you have any comments or suggestions. We would welcome any contributions for future issues - articles, opinions, reports, recipes, poems, brain-teasers - whatever you would like to see in print! 2021 Copy Dates; April/May 15.3.21 June/July 15.5.21 The nursery is split into 3 separate rooms which enables us Copy must be received before these dates to guarantee its appearance. Pea Pod Day Nursery is a small, to promote a home from home Please note that the committee reserve the right to edit or omit any material family run 29 place day nursery experience with a very friendly, submitted. Opinions expressed in published articles remain the at Hickling Pastures, on the warm environment and in our rural responsibility of the author. Articles may be published anonymously but the A606 between Melton and setting the children have the committee does need to have details of authorship before publication. Nottingham, only a few yards opportunity to explore open fields from the A46 roundabout. and have access to a number of If you are submitting articles ready for publication - (either typed or in different animals. computer format) we would be grateful if you could send it in A5 size. -
Bailey's Croft
95 and 97 Main Street, Willoughby, photographed in 1985. ‘Bailey’sCroft’, Willoughbyon the Wolds DavidBailey From the early part of the eighteenth century the Bailey families who gave their name to the ‘Bailey Croft’ development at Willoughbylived in these cottages and the farm at the rear. The families originated in Nottingham before moving to the parishes of Wymeswoldand Nether Broughtonin Leicestershire, close to the border with Nottinghamshire. They finally settled at Willoughbyon the Woldsin the southernmosttip of Nottinghamshire. There they lived and worked, within the village community, for two centuries. A greater part of that time was spent living in the cottages pictured above. This building witnessed their growth into an established village family who, over five generations, were involved in shoemaking, joinery, shop-keeping and farming. They were joined in marriage by other families from Willoughbyand nearby parishes. The family had also become monconformistin the early ninetenthcentury and followed the Wesleyan Methodist tradition. Their lives were far from being uneventful, experiencing their share of tragedy. The advent of the twentieth century heralded the 1 Road map with distances (in miles) to surrounding settlements. decline of village life. Two World Wars, improved transport links, mass production and new farming methods changed village life forever. No longer was there a requirement for craftsmen or tradesmen within the community. Family members sought employment away from the village, where they married and raised a family. Consequently, with the passing of time, many of the families in the village ceased to exist. The Bailey family was no exception. In 1987 the last family member living at Willoughbyon the Wolds died. -
The Open Fields of Northamptonshire
Chapter 3 Methods of reconstruction of open field plans Dating of ridge and furrow It has been assumed, so far, that all the sUIviving ridge and furrow is ofpre-enclosure date, and medieval in origin. The validity of this assumption must be considered; because it was much debated in the recent past, with little agreement being reached as to whether the ridges did or did not have a close relation to the open-field strips. Recent historians took it for granted that ridge and furrow was to be equated with medieval cultivation. Tate identified Sir John Lubbock, in 1892, as the first (post ' enclosure) author to equate ridge and furrow with former open-field husbandryl, and Maitland, in 1897, referred to 'the practice of ploughing the land into 'beds' or ridges, which has but recently fallen out of use. : . Anyone who has walked through English grass fields will know what they look like, for they triumph over time and change2• Trevelyan3 wrote in 1944: 'the outline ofmany ofthese strips ploughed by farmers of Saxon, mediaeval and Tudor-Stuart times can still be clearly seen. The 'ridge and furrow' of pasture fields that once were arable is one of the common features of the·English landscape today ... Often, though not always, the 'ridge' or 'land' ... reproduced a 'strip' that was ploughed and worked long ago by a peasant farmer.' This accurate statement was followed by the work of Beresford4, who, in 1948, again drew attention to ridge and furrow, linking ground observations with the evidence of maps and written records. Beresford was convinced of the pre-enclosure origins of much ridge and furrow, and made detailed comparisons of surviving examples with large scale open-field maps in eight parishes. -
Ridge-And-Furrow in Kent
http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society RIDGE-AND-FURROW IN KENT PROFESSOR W. R. MEAD AND DR. R. J. P. KAIN Ridge-and-furrow is a landscape feature which continues to claim popular interest especially among local historians. It attracts most interest where it is most apparent. It is arguably no less significant where it is least evident since the reasons for its absence in one place may help to explain its presence elsewhere. The total distribution of this relict feature of the British landscape is unknown. Interest in it was generated in Britain in the immediate post-war years by M. W. Beresford1 and Eric Kerridge.2 In brief, Beresford is the protagonist of the school of thought which identifies ridge-and-furrow w i t h the open field system and equates the pattern of ridges with that of former strips and furlongs. Kerridge considers the feature to be essentially the product of ploughing for drainage purposes. Debate about the origins of ridge-and-furrow usually leads to the conclusion that there is no single explanation. The only constant in the equation is that it is the product of the plough; but, since the plough is a variable in its own right, it also enters the area of debate. The first extended map of ridge-and-furrow was initiated in the late 1940s.3 It covered the county of Buckinghamshire, a territory which spans a variety of geological formations and soil types. It was predictable that a major contrast would be evident between the occurrence of the feature on the chalk lands in the south and the clay lands of the north. -
Leices'rershire. [KILLY's Harriman John, Market Gardener Hubbard Samuel, Royal P.H
BROVGBTON .ASTLEY. LEICEs'rERSHIRE. [KILLY'S Harriman John, market gardener Hubbard Samuel, Royal P.H. &; butcher IMartin Harriet (Mrs.), farmer Hopkins William, farmer IHunt William, farmer Tite Edmund, jobbing gardener NETHER BROUGHTON is a village and parish on of Caius College, Cambridge, and rural dean of Framland the borders of Nottinghamslure, 1~ miles north-east from third portion. A National school was built here in 1845 and Old Dalby station on the Melton and Nottingham branch of enlarged to hold 100 in 1847, by the Rev. John Noble B.A. the Midland line, 6 miles north-west from Melton Mowbray late rector, and is now used for the purposes of a Church and 121 from London by rail, in the Eastern division of the Sunday school and for parish meetings. A Wesleyan chapel county, Framland hundred, Melton Mowbray union, petty was built in 1829. Here are charities (left 1682), producing sessional division and county court district, rural deanery of about £7 yearly. There are no manorial rights. A.. Lang Framland third portion, archdeaconry of Leicester and ham esq. and Seymour Pleydell Bouverie esq. are the prin diocese of Peterborough. The church of St. Mar,V is a cipal landowners. The soIl is heavy clay; subsoil, clay. building of stone in the Gothic style of the 14th century, The chief crops are turnips, wheat, oats and barley, with a consisting of chancel, clerestoried nave of three bays, aisles lal'ge quantity of pasture. The area is 2,230 acres; rate and an embattled tower with pinnacles, containing 3 bells, able value, £4,084; in 1881 the population was 454. -
Annual Review 2016
nationalchurchestrust.org facebook.com/nationalchurchestrust @natchurchtrust flickr.com/photos/nationalchurchestrust vimeo.com/nationalchurchestrust Instagram.com/nationalchurchestrust You can support the work of the National Churches Trust by making a donation online at www.nationalchurchestrust.org/donate The National Churches Trust 7 Tufton Street, London SW1P 3QB Telephone: 020 7222 0605 Web: www.nationalchurchestrust.org Email [email protected] St Catherine’s church, Temple, Cornwall For people who love church buildings Published by The National Churches Trust ©2017 Company registered in England Registration number 06265201 Annual Review Registered charity number 1119845 2016 – 2017 Printed by Gemini Print Southern Ltd Designed by GADS Limited Contents Patron Chairman’s Introduction .............................................4 Her Majesty The Queen The Year in Review ........................................................5 Vice Patron HRH The Duke of Gloucester KG GCVO ARIBA Grants Programme .................................................... 14 Presidents Bill Bryson, ExploreChurches ................................. 19 The Archbishop of Canterbury The Archbishop of York Lucy Winkett, Using our church buildings ........ 22 Vice Presidents Catherine Pepinster, Joseph Hansom – Bill Bryson OBE A Victorian great ........................................................ 24 Sarah Bracher MBE Lord Cormack FSA Dr Matthew Byrne, English Parish Churches Robin Cotton MBE Huw Edwards and Chapels ................................................................ -
Sustainability Appraisal (SA) / Strategic
Leicestershire Minerals Development Framework: Site Allocations DPD (Preferred Options) Sustainability Appraisal (SA) / Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Sustainability Appraisal Report (Appendices) June 2006 Prepared for Leicestershire County Council by: Atkins Ltd Axis 6 th Floor West 10 Holliday St Birmingham B1 1TF Tel: Nicki Schiessel 0121 483 5986 Email: [email protected] This document is copyright and should not be copied in whole or in part by any means other than with the approval of Atkins Consultants Limited. Any unauthorised user of the document shall be responsible for all liabilities arising out of such use. Leicestershire Minerals Development Framework Site Allocations DPD Sustainability Appraisal Report Appendices Contents Section Page Appendix A: List of Consultees and Interested Stakeholders 1 Appendix B: Summary of the Consultation Responses on the Scoping Report 15 Appendix C: Baseline Tables 23 Appendix D: Assessment of Proposed Sites 38 Leicestershire Minerals Development Framework Site Allocations DPD Sustainability Appraisal Report Appendices APPENDIX A: LIST OF CONSULTEES AND INTERESTED STAKEHOLDERS 1 Leicestershire Minerals Development Framework Site Allocations DPD Sustainability Appraisal Report Appendices SPECIFIC CONSULTATION BODIES GENERAL: East Midlands Regional Assembly Highways Agency, Melton Mowbray Programme Planning & Development, Birmingham Countryside Agency, East Midlands Region, East Midlands Development Agency Nottingham Nottingham Environment Agency, Leicestershire Partnership -
Trials to Identify Soil Cultivation Practices to Minimise the Impact on Archaeological Sites (Defra Project Number BD1705) Effec
Trials to Identify Soil Cultivation Practices to Minimise the Impact on Archaeological Sites (Defra project number BD1705) Effects of Arable Cultivation on Archaeology (EH Project number 3874) Known collectively as: ‘Trials’ Appendix 4: Studying the effects of different cultivation systems on archaeological earthworks December 2010 Client: English Heritage and Defra Issue No: 2 OA Job No: 1879 Appendix 4 The effects of different cultivation systems on archaeological earthworks By K Spandl, C Champness, M L Dresser, M J Hann, and R J Godwin Edited by P Booth and K Spandl Oxford Archaeology and Cranfield University i 14/12/10 Oxford Archaeology and Cranfield University Final report Appendix 4 The effects of different cultivation systems on archaeological earthworks 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background .................................................................................................................................1 1.2 Introduction to the project...........................................................................................................2 1.3 Aims of the project.......................................................................................................................2 2 Agriculture and earthworks - background ................................................................... 4 2.1 Affects of cultivation on earthworks ............................................................................................4 -
MELTON • Melton Mowbray Heritage Trail • Aspects of Melton Mowbray MELTON • Gourmet Taste of Leicestershire • What’S on in Melton Mowbray, Events Calendar
. p e t s r o o d s t i n o s e i r e t a e e n i f e h t f o e n o ! o w t . n o i t i t e p m o c . t c e r i d r e g a n a M e r t n e C n i g n i n e v e e h t f f o h s i n i f d n a e s u o h - e r u t c i p . r e f f o o t s a h n o t l e M s e c n e i r e p x e . s y a w e l d i r b f o s e l i m g n o l a k c a b e s r o h r o f 9 0 1 £ t s u j r o f k a e r b t r o h s e r i h s r e t s e c i e L g n i k a b s d n a l d i M t s a E e h t r e t n e d n a r i a F n w o T n o t l e M e h t t c a t n o c e s a e l p , s e c n e i r e p x E a m e n i C l a g e R d e h s i b r u f e r e u q i n u e h t t a 0 1 t a e r g e h t f o e m o s e r o l p x e u o y p l e h l l i w e d i u g n o e d i s y r t n u o c e r i h s r e t s e c i e L e h t e r o l p x E 5 0 1 f o e t s a T t e m r u o G e u l a v t a e r g e h t e c n e i r e p x E y r t n u o C n o t l e M t a d a e r b l a e r e k a b d n a e t s a T e t s a T l a c o l k o o b r o e c i v r e s t e e r g d n a t e e m n o t l e M 5 e c n e i r e p x e c i t a m e n i c l u f r e d n o w a n i t h g i l e D s i h T . -
AERIAL ARCHAEOLOGY and the EVIDENCE for MEDIEVAL FARMING in WEST CHESHIRE R. Williams, M.A.. R.I.B.A., F.S.A
AERIAL ARCHAEOLOGY AND THE EVIDENCE FOR MEDIEVAL FARMING IN WEST CHESHIRE R. Williams, M.A.. R.I.B.A., F.S.A. Aerial archaeology, or the use of aerial photographs to interpret the landscape, is not new. The first aerial photo graphs were taken from balloons in the 19th century, but it was aerial reconnaissance during the first World VVar that made archaeologists appreciate the possibilities of this techni que for their own research. Aerial archaeology had not been seriously attempted in Cheshire until it was realised that the prolonged drought during 1976 was revealing hitherto un known ancient features throughout Britain. The unusual conditions were producing the well-known crop mark phenomenon, where a buried feature is made 'visible' on the surface by premature ripening or differential growth in the crop immediately above it. The conditions obtaining in 1976 were exceptional, but they do occur to a sufficient degree to produce some crop marks in any dry summer in most English counties. In most counties, but not in all; some counties, Cheshire among them, have for many years been pastoral rather than arable, and there have been few crops in which such marks could appear. Crop growing involves ploughing and this, too, can reveal ancient features which appear as lines or patterns of discol ouration in the soil. Unfortunately, for the aerial observer, soil marks, as these features are called, are as rare as crop marks in Cheshire, so that another method of discovery has to be used. This makes use of a very low sun which brings into sharp relief even minor declivities and protuberances on the ground. -
Natural and Historical Environment Introduction
Natural and Historical Environment Introduction Landscape, geology and setting Arnesby is a hilltop village at the northern edge of the ridge that is central England’s main watershed, between the Soar/Trent, the Welland and the Avon. This position gives the parish an elevated aspect, with extensive northward vistas across the Midland to Charnwood Forest, and more intimate views into the rolling country of south Leicestershire in other directions. Geologically, the whole Plan Area is underlain by Jurassic clay and siltstone, but this is only Topographical map of Arnesby revealed in the valley bottoms where streams have cut through the thick covering of glacial till, a mixture of heavy clay, sand and gravel. Outcrops of sand and gravel within the glacial clay determined the original (Anglo-Saxon) locations of settlements in the area because of the associated combination of freshwater Topographical map of Arnesby springs and dry ground for building sites. Generally, soils in the Plan Area are heavy and fairly fertile; in the 18th century this part of the country was renowned for its ’champion’ grazing land, although much has been converted to arable since the mid-20th century. Geological map of Arnesby. The whole parish is mapped at Grade 3 in the Brown - Jurassic clay; blue - glacial till, national agricultural land classification scheme; cream – alluvium. Source: British Geological Survey detailed post-1988 mapping is not available to distinguish 3a (which is the lowest of ‘best and most versatile’ classes) from 3b, which is not specially protected under National Planning regulations. The parish is located in National Character Area NCA 94 Leicestershire Vales, as defined by Natural England for planning purposes. -
Middle Lane, Nether Broughton, Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire, LE14 3HD
Middle Lane, Nether Broughton, Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire, LE14 3HD LOCATION Contents LOCATION Introduction An invaluable insight into your new home This Location Information brochure offers an informed overview of Middle Lane as a potential new home, along with essential material about its surrounding area and its local community. It provides a valuable insight for any prospective owner or tenant. We wanted to provide you with information that you can absorb quickly, so we have presented it as visually as possible, making use of maps, icons, tables, graphs and charts. Overall, the brochure contains information about: The Property - including property details, floor plans, room details, photographs and Energy Performance Certificate. Transport - including locations of bus and coach stops, railway stations and ferry ports. Health - including locations, contact details and organisational information on the nearest GPs, pharmacies, hospitals and dentists. Local Policing - including locations, contact details and information about local community policing and the nearest police station, as well as police officers assigned to the area. Education - including locations of infant, primary and secondary schools and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for each key stage. Local Amenities - including locations of local services and facilities - everything from convenience stores to leisure centres, golf courses, theatres and DIY centres. Census - We have given a breakdown of the local community's age, employment and educational statistics. Bentons