INTRODUCTION the Turbulent and Curious History of India-Pakistan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

INTRODUCTION the Turbulent and Curious History of India-Pakistan INTRODUCTION The turbulent and curious history of India-Pakistan relations makes it one of the most intriguing bilateral relationships in the modern history. Having passed seventy years of independence both the countries are locked into a confrontational matrix. This rivalry spans over historical, cultural and socio-political discourse. The contradictory rather belligerent policy postures towards one another have plagued bilateral relations. The strategic and security domain has further cemented this enmity. High scales and low scale escalations between both the states contributed distrust, suspicion and security dilemma in the ever perplexed equation of mutual hostility. This rivalry is ending within no near sight. The foreign policy dispensations had been prone to confrontation always. This pattern of relationship is crystallizing into a volatile and unsettled frame of reference. The reciprocal, regressive and reactionary nature of this relationship makes it more arbitrary and inconsistent. The longstanding conflicts serve as an impetus to this configuration of animosity. The broader contours of South Asian security pivots around the essential nature of India-Pakistan relations. The embroiled pattern of relationship between both the countries is compounding the precarious regional security environment. Problem Statement India and Pakistan have divergent ideological orientations, and the formation of Pakistan on communal lines embittered the relations. The contradictory ideals of democracy and secularism in India and Islam and the two nation theory for Pakistan stemmed out of pre-independence struggle. It marked a shaky start since the beginning. The foreign policy of a state is the reflection of its priorities beyond territorial jurisdiction and is guided by national interest. It is a broader framework of the objectives of a state and means to achieve them. States imply different tools to achieve their foreign policy goals. The interplay of structural variables and an impulse of anticipated outcomes define the foreign policy posture of a state. The course of foreign policy action for every state is different based on its capabilities. The determinants of foreign policy are also different for every state. India's foreign policy in recent decades reflects India's status as rising power and its multilateral engagements. India amid its rapid development and economic prosperity has come in the center of the attention in 1 past two decades. Its foreign policy orientation is trying to be in commensuration with its trajectory of emerging power. Globally India is receiving much attention given its consumerist economy, functional democracy, and rich cultural traits. India has overcome the sluggish and archaic image of a postcolonial state. India envisages itself in the bracket of a major power and intends to compete with the advanced and developed countries. It is also seeking a global and regional influence and wants to have a proactive foreign policy. The significance of domestic politics in foreign policymaking has been signified in past a few decades in international relations. A country's foreign policy is the reflection of the domestic behavior of a state at the external level. The domestic structure of India, on the other hand, presents a diverse and heterogeneous standpoint. Historically Indian polity exhibited three dominant themes secularism, nationalism, and democracy. Indian National Congress, the forerunner political party in India, remained espoused to these ideals. This secularism strengthens the composite culture which Congress believes is a civilizational trait of Indian polity. On the contrary, Hindu nationalism is an alternative rather fierce rebuttal of secularism and composite culture. It offers Hindu communalist variant of nationalism and counterweighs secularism with the ideals of the Hindu majority. These two dominant discourses shape the broader contours of Indian polity. Along with this India also experience competing views, issues of minorities, central and regional political parties and emerging issues of regionalism. All these factors collectively become domestic undercurrents towards foreign policy decision-making. Pakistan remains a predicament for India. The equation of India's relationship with Pakistan limits India's foreign policy ambitions. In the meanwhile, the hostile domestic perception of Pakistan in India makes it relevant and inescapable. The deeply grounded rivalry with Pakistan is cultural, religious and historical. Its expressions are a hindrance and persistent consternation for India. India's foreign policy outlook towards Pakistan speaks volume of this mutual antagonism. The event-specific trajectories foster the hostility and subsequent pursuit of foreign policy choices that trigger more confrontation at political and social level. The research undertaken aims to study and explore the theory and the practice of India's foreign policy towards Pakistan. It tries to address the changing themes and patterns in Indian foreign policy vis-à-vis 2 Pakistan. The research takes a holistic picture of India's policy towards Pakistan and then attempts to dissect the critical narratives on the pursuit of foreign policy choices by Indian nationalists and Hindu nationalists. It presents a detailed anecdote of the etymological origin and underlying theoretical patterns of both the dominant discourses in Indian domestic landscape. The research undertaken is unique in two ways. It is a theoretical study of Indian foreign policy through the domestic lens. Foreign policy is overwhelmingly a phenomenon of international relations whereas competing discourses fall in the domain of political science. This research attempts to conjoin the academic boundaries of international relations and political science. It endeavors to study the foreign policy construction of India through the pretext of Indian nationalism and Hindu nationalism. It is an interdisciplinary research which addresses the broader outlook of Indian foreign policy, narrows it down to Pakistan and envisions it in the domestic purview and further splits it down to the Indian National Congress and Bharatya Janta Party. It attempts to explore the divergent patterns in the foreign policy ostentation of INC and BJP towards Pakistan. Significance of Research This research is significant for the understanding of domestic undercurrent of Indian policy towards Pakistan. It is a rigorous academic endeavor to understand India's Pakistan policy through the party-centric view, ideological disposition and national impetus. It offers a fresh perspective on India-Pakistan relations through their historical and sociological lineage. It tries to understand the cognitive and normative discourse of Indian foreign policy vis-à-vis Pakistan. The anecdotal explanation of India Pakistan relations and prospective scenarios will be hugely beneficial for the learners working in this field. It will be a useful study for the students of Indian foreign policy, India-Pakistan relations, BJP, Indian National Congress and India's domestic milieu. Research Questions What are the major competing discourses in India regarding Pakistan and how are they serving as the domestic sources of foreign policy? 3 What is the historical and sociological construct of India-Pakistan relations, and how does it impact India’s approach towards Pakistan? How Congress and BJP’s governments differ in their foreign policy dispensation towards Pakistan? What are the divergent patterns and responses in the practice of India’s foreign relations vis-à-vis Pakistan and what is the future of India-Pakistan relations? Hypothesis The impact of Pakistan on India's foreign relations is very prominent, and Pakistan holds a crucial position in India's foreign policy matrix. There is a significant divergence in the choice of foreign policy actions in Congress led governments and BJP’s ruling dispensations. Research Methodology This study is based on qualitative research and followed an open-ended approach to consider how ideational factors influence the decision-making and reflects in India's policy towards Pakistan. The researcher tried to employ how the perceptions of Indian National Congress and Bharatya Janta Party influence their response towards Pakistan. Dealing with the intangible factor and its impact on Indian policy was quite challenging. The researcher built a comprehensive picture of India-Pakistan relations through the available record and published material. The textual analysis of the available policy documents, critical statements and speeches were made to interpret the precarious course of India's policy towards Pakistan. Indian Ministry of External Affairs in 2012 published a massive volume on India Pakistan relations, but that was not enough to suffice the need for primary data. Amid the confrontational nature of India-Pakistan relations, the necessary record was not accessible. It triggered the need for extensive semi- structured open-ended interviews to develop the primary insights. It included interviews with academics, policy experts, think tank researchers and people working on the same thematic areas. The absence of academic intelligentsia on this topic in Pakistan was a great challenge. Amid visa denial to India, the researcher traveled to the United 4 Kingdom to carry out the requisite interviews. Emails were sent to the relevant scholars to know their opinion and perspective on the said topic. The in-depth discussions and personal interviews developed insights. Some personal
Recommended publications
  • The Case for 1950S China-India History
    Before 1962: The Case for 1950s China-India History The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Ghosh, Arunabh. 2017. Before 1962: The Case for 1950s China-India History. The Journal of Asian Studies 76, no. 3: 697-727. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:41288160 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP DRAFT: DO NOT CITE OR CIRCULATE Before 1962: The Case for 1950s China-India History Arunabh Ghosh ABSTRACT China-India history of the 1950s remains mired in concerns related to border demarcations and a teleological focus on the causes, course, and consequence of the war of 1962. The result is an overt emphasis on diplomatic and international history of a rather narrow form. In critiquing this narrowness, this paper offers an alternate chronology accompanied by two substantive case studies. Taken together, they demonstrate that an approach that takes seriously cultural, scientific and economic life leads to different sources and different historical arguments from an approach focused on political (and especially high political) life. Such a shift in emphasis, away from conflict, and onto moments of contact, comparison, cooperation, and competition, can contribute fresh perspectives not just on the histories of China and India, but also on histories of the Global South. Arunabh Ghosh ([email protected]) is Assistant Professor of Modern Chinese History in the Department of History at Harvard University Vikram Seth first learned about the death of “Lita” in the Chinese city of Turfan on a sultry July day in 1981.
    [Show full text]
  • A Look Into the Conflict Between India and Pakistan Over Kashmir Written by Pranav Asoori
    A Look into the Conflict Between India and Pakistan over Kashmir Written by Pranav Asoori This PDF is auto-generated for reference only. As such, it may contain some conversion errors and/or missing information. For all formal use please refer to the official version on the website, as linked below. A Look into the Conflict Between India and Pakistan over Kashmir https://www.e-ir.info/2020/10/07/a-look-into-the-conflict-between-india-and-pakistan-over-kashmir/ PRANAV ASOORI, OCT 7 2020 The region of Kashmir is one of the most volatile areas in the world. The nations of India and Pakistan have fiercely contested each other over Kashmir, fighting three major wars and two minor wars. It has gained immense international attention given the fact that both India and Pakistan are nuclear powers and this conflict represents a threat to global security. Historical Context To understand this conflict, it is essential to look back into the history of the area. In August of 1947, India and Pakistan were on the cusp of independence from the British. The British, led by the then Governor-General Louis Mountbatten, divided the British India empire into the states of India and Pakistan. The British India Empire was made up of multiple princely states (states that were allegiant to the British but headed by a monarch) along with states directly headed by the British. At the time of the partition, princely states had the right to choose whether they were to cede to India or Pakistan. To quote Mountbatten, “Typically, geographical circumstance and collective interests, et cetera will be the components to be considered[1].
    [Show full text]
  • Afzal Guru's Execution
    Contents ARTICLES - India’s Compass On Terror Is Faulty What Does The Chinese Take Over - Kanwal Sibal 3 Of Gwadar Imply? 46 Stop Appeasing Pakistan - Radhakrishna Rao 6 - Satish Chandra Reforming The Criminal Justice 103 Slandering The Indian Army System 51 10 - PP Shukla - Dr. N Manoharan 107 Hydro Power Projects Race To Tap The ‘Indophobia’ And Its Expressions Potential Of Brahmaputra River 15 - Dr. Anirban Ganguly 62 - Brig (retd) Vinod Anand Pakistan Looks To Increase Its Defence Acquisition: Urgent Need For Defence Footprint In Afghanistan Structural Reforms 21 - Monish Gulati 69 - Brig (retd) Gurmeet Kanwal Political Impasse Over The The Governor , The Constitution And The Caretaker Government In 76 Courts 25 Bangladesh - Dr M N Buch - Neha Mehta Indian Budget Plays With Fiscal Fire 34 - Ananth Nageswaran EVENTS Afzal Guru’s Execution: Propaganda, Politics And Portents 41 Vimarsha: Security Implications Of - Sushant Sareen Contemporary Political 80 Environment In India VIVEK : Issues and Options March – 2013 Issue: II No: III 2 India’s Compass On Terror Is Faulty - Kanwal Sibal fzal Guru’s hanging shows state actors outside any law. The the ineptness with which numbers involved are small and A our political system deals the targets are unsuspecting and with the grave problem of unprepared individuals in the terrorism. The biggest challenge to street, in public transport, hotels our security, and indeed that of or restaurants or peaceful public countries all over the world that spaces. Suicide bombers and car are caught in the cross currents of bombs can cause substantial religious extremism, is terrorism. casualties indiscriminately. Shadowy groups with leaders in Traditional military threats can be hiding orchestrate these attacks.
    [Show full text]
  • India Nation Action Programme to Combat Desertification
    lR;eso t;rs INDIA NATION ACTION PROGRAMME TO COMBAT DESERTIFICATION In the Context of UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION TO COMBAT DESERTIFICATION (UNCCD) Volume-I Status of Desertification MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT & FORESTS GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NEW DELHI September 2001 National Action Programme to Combat Desertification FOREWORD India is endowed with a wide variety of climate, ecological regions, land and water resources. However, with barely 2.4% of the total land area of the world, our country has to be support 16.7% of the total human population and about 18% of the total livestock population of the world. This has put enormous pressure on our natural resources. Ecosystems are highly complex systems relating to a number of factors -both biotic and abiotic - governing them. Natural ecosystems by and large have a high resilience for stability and regeneration. However, continued interference and relentless pressures on utilisation of resources leads to an upset of this balance. If these issues are not effectively and adequately addressed in a holistic manner, they can lead to major environmental problems such as depletion of vegetative cover, increase in soil ero- sion, decline in water table, and loss of biodiversity all of which directly impact our very survival. Thus, measures for conservation of soil and other natural resources, watershed development and efficient water management are the key to sustainable development of the country. The socio-ecomonic aspects of human activities form an important dimension to the issue of conservation and protection of natural resources. The measures should not only include rehabilitation of degraded lands but to also ensure that the living condi- tions of the local communities are improved.
    [Show full text]
  • Compounding Injustice: India
    INDIA 350 Fifth Ave 34 th Floor New York, N.Y. 10118-3299 http://www.hrw.org (212) 290-4700 Vol. 15, No. 3 (C) – July 2003 Afsara, a Muslim woman in her forties, clutches a photo of family members killed in the February-March 2002 communal violence in Gujarat. Five of her close family members were murdered, including her daughter. Afsara’s two remaining children survived but suffered serious burn injuries. Afsara filed a complaint with the police but believes that the police released those that she identified, along with many others. Like thousands of others in Gujarat she has little faith in getting justice and has few resources with which to rebuild her life. ©2003 Smita Narula/Human Rights Watch COMPOUNDING INJUSTICE: THE GOVERNMENT’S FAILURE TO REDRESS MASSACRES IN GUJARAT 1630 Connecticut Ave, N.W., Suite 500 2nd Floor, 2-12 Pentonville Road 15 Rue Van Campenhout Washington, DC 20009 London N1 9HF, UK 1000 Brussels, Belgium TEL (202) 612-4321 TEL: (44 20) 7713 1995 TEL (32 2) 732-2009 FAX (202) 612-4333 FAX: (44 20) 7713 1800 FAX (32 2) 732-0471 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] July 2003 Vol. 15, No. 3 (C) COMPOUNDING INJUSTICE: The Government's Failure to Redress Massacres in Gujarat Table of Contents I. Summary............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Impunity for Attacks Against Muslims...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Section) Padma Awards Directory (1954-2009) Year-Wise List Sl
    MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS (Public Section) Padma Awards Directory (1954-2009) Year-Wise List Sl. Prefix First Name Last Name Award State Field Remarks 1954 1 Dr. Sarvapalli Radhakrishnan BR TN Public Affairs Expired 2 Shri Chakravarti Rajagopalachari BR TN Public Affairs Expired 3 Dr. Chandrasekhara Raman BR TN Science & Eng. Expired Venkata 4 Shri Nand Lal Bose PV WB Art Expired 5 Dr. Satyendra Nath Bose PV WB Litt. & Edu. 6 Dr. Zakir Hussain PV AP Public Affairs Expired 7 Shri B.G. Kher PV MAH Public Affairs Expired 8 Shri V.K. Krishna Menon PV KER Public Affairs Expired 9 Shri Jigme Dorji Wangchuk PV BHU Public Affairs 10 Dr. Homi Jehangir Bhabha PB MAH Science & Eng. Expired 11 Dr. Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar PB UP Science & Eng. Expired 12 Shri Mahadeva Iyer Ganapati PB OR Civil Service 13 Dr. J.C. Ghosh PB WB Science & Eng. Expired 14 Shri Maithilisharan Gupta PB UP Litt. & Edu. Expired 15 Shri Radha Krishan Gupta PB DEL Civil Service Expired 16 Shri R.R. Handa PB PUN Civil Service Expired 17 Shri Amar Nath Jha PB UP Litt. & Edu. Expired 18 Shri Malihabadi Josh PB DEL Litt. & Edu. 19 Dr. Ajudhia Nath Khosla PB DEL Science & Eng. Expired 20 Shri K.S. Krishnan PB TN Science & Eng. Expired 21 Shri Moulana Hussain Madni PB PUN Litt. & Edu. Ahmed 22 Shri V.L. Mehta PB GUJ Public Affairs Expired 23 Shri Vallathol Narayana Menon PB KER Litt. & Edu. Expired Wednesday, July 22, 2009 Page 1 of 133 Sl. Prefix First Name Last Name Award State Field Remarks 24 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • COI QUERY Disclaimer
    COI QUERY Country of Origin Pakistan Main subject Situation in Pakistan-administered Kashmir Question(s) 1. General information Historical background Population and ethnic groups Returnees in Kashmir and Punjab Religious demography 2. Political situation 3. Human rights situation General overview Ethnic conflict Sectarian conflict 4. Security situation Conflict-related violence Line of control violations Cross-border attacks Examples of cross-border violence in 2020 Armed groups Hizb-ul-Mujahideen (HM) Jaish-e Muhammad (JeM) Lashkar-e Taiba (LeT) Harakat ul-Mujahidin (HuM) Date of completion 6 October 2020 Query Code Q27-2020 Contributing EU+ COI -- units (if applicable) Disclaimer This response to a COI query has been elaborated according to the EASO COI Report Methodology and EASO Writing and Referencing Guide. The information provided in this response has been researched, evaluated and processed with utmost care within a limited time frame. All sources used are referenced. A quality review has been performed in line with the above mentioned methodology. This document does not claim to be exhaustive neither conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to international protection. If a certain event, person or organisation is not mentioned in the report, this does not mean that the event has not taken place or that the person or organisation does not exist. Terminology used should not be regarded as indicative of a particular legal position. 1 The information in the response does not necessarily reflect the opinion of EASO and makes no political statement whatsoever. The target audience is caseworkers, COI researchers, policy makers, and decision making authorities. The answer was finalised on 6 October 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Development Plan
    The Doon School Development Plan Maintaining our pre-eminence May 2012 The Doon School The Mall Dehradun 248001 Uttaranchal India Tel: +91-135-2526-400 Fax: +91-135-275-7275 The Doon School Development Plan: Maintaining our pre-eminence, May 2012 Copyright © 2012 by The Doon School This report is being communicated to the recipient on a confidential basis and does not carry any right of publication or disclosure to any third party. By accepting delivery of this report, the recipient undertakes not to reproduce or distribute this report in whole or in part, nor to disclose any of its contents, in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without the express prior written consent from The Doon School. Cover Photo: © Amit Pasricha The Doon School Development Plan Maintaining our pre-eminence May 2012 From its very inception and opening in 1935, The Doon School was clearly an Indian school, developing “… boys to serve a free and democratic India”, as articulated by Arthur Foot, the School’s first headmaster. Each aspect of the School was designed to prepare leaders who would build and serve a great nation. The Doon School Development Plan 2 Maintaining our pre-eminence: The Doon School Development Plan From its very inception and opening in 1935, The Doon School was clearly an Indian school, developing “…boys to serve a free and democratic India,” as articulated by Arthur Foot, the School’s first headmaster. Each aspect of the School was designed to prepare leaders who would build and serve a great nation. Boys from every background, caste, race, creed, and religion proudly sang the national anthem before it was adopted by a free India; boys and teachers were taught to value service before self; and secularism, discipline, and equality characterised the School’s playgrounds, houses, and classrooms long before these values reached other schools or the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Kashmir: Abolition of Article 370
    Kashmir: Abolition of Article 370 E Digest Compilation of Relevant articles and YouTube videos Compilation by Ram Puniyani (For Private Circulation) Center for Study of Society and Secularism 602 & 603, New Silver Star, Behind BEST Bus Depot, Santacruz (E), Mumbai: - 400 055. E-mail: [email protected], www.csss-isla.com 1 | P a g e Preface Kashmir has been in the news from last couple of months and the Government has abolished article 370 and Article 35A. At the same time the state has been split into two union territories. All these actions of the government have been followed up by a massive propaganda that the Kashmir problem has been the doing of Pundit Jawaharlal Nehru, had Sardar Patel been dealing with the issue, the problem would not have been there. False claims are being made that Babasaheb Ambedkar was against Article 370. A video film has been released by BJP to propagate these falsehoods at broad level. This compilation is an attempt to put forward the documented History, the events which led to accession of Kashmir with India and the rise of militancy there off, why the Constituent Assembly drafted Article 370 as the part of Indian Constitution. The basic similarities in the approach of Nehru and Patel on the issue of Kashmir are brought out. Also how Babasaheb opined on division of Kashmir into Indian and Pakistani part is also outlined. We also have given the video links of some of the YouTube videos on the topic. Your feedback to this compilation is welcome. Ram Puniyani Center for Study of Society and Secularism, Mumbai [email protected] 2 | P a g e Table of Contents Page No.
    [Show full text]
  • Last Post Indian War Memorials Around the World
    Last Post Indian War Memorials Around the World Introduction • 1 Rana Chhina Last Post Indian War Memorials Around the World i Capt Suresh Sharma Last Post Indian War Memorials Around the World Rana T.S. Chhina Centre for Armed Forces Historical Research United Service Institution of India 2014 First published 2014 © United Service Institution of India All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without prior permission of the author / publisher. ISBN 978-81-902097-9-3 Centre for Armed Forces Historical Research United Service Institution of India Rao Tula Ram Marg, Post Bag No. 8, Vasant Vihar PO New Delhi 110057, India. email: [email protected] www.usiofindia.org Printed by Aegean Offset Printers, Gr. Noida, India. Capt Suresh Sharma Contents Foreword ix Introduction 1 Section I The Two World Wars 15 Memorials around the World 47 Section II The Wars since Independence 129 Memorials in India 161 Acknowledgements 206 Appendix A Indian War Dead WW-I & II: Details by CWGC Memorial 208 Appendix B CWGC Commitment Summary by Country 230 The Gift of India Is there ought you need that my hands hold? Rich gifts of raiment or grain or gold? Lo! I have flung to the East and the West Priceless treasures torn from my breast, and yielded the sons of my stricken womb to the drum-beats of duty, the sabers of doom. Gathered like pearls in their alien graves Silent they sleep by the Persian waves, scattered like shells on Egyptian sands, they lie with pale brows and brave, broken hands, strewn like blossoms mowed down by chance on the blood-brown meadows of Flanders and France.
    [Show full text]
  • Jihadist Violence: the Indian Threat
    JIHADIST VIOLENCE: THE INDIAN THREAT By Stephen Tankel Jihadist Violence: The Indian Threat 1 Available from : Asia Program Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20004-3027 www.wilsoncenter.org/program/asia-program ISBN: 978-1-938027-34-5 THE WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS, established by Congress in 1968 and headquartered in Washington, D.C., is a living national memorial to President Wilson. The Center’s mission is to commemorate the ideals and concerns of Woodrow Wilson by providing a link between the worlds of ideas and policy, while fostering research, study, discussion, and collaboration among a broad spectrum of individuals concerned with policy and scholarship in national and interna- tional affairs. Supported by public and private funds, the Center is a nonpartisan insti- tution engaged in the study of national and world affairs. It establishes and maintains a neutral forum for free, open, and informed dialogue. Conclusions or opinions expressed in Center publications and programs are those of the authors and speakers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Center staff, fellows, trustees, advisory groups, or any individuals or organizations that provide financial support to the Center. The Center is the publisher of The Wilson Quarterly and home of Woodrow Wilson Center Press, dialogue radio and television. For more information about the Center’s activities and publications, please visit us on the web at www.wilsoncenter.org. BOARD OF TRUSTEES Thomas R. Nides, Chairman of the Board Sander R. Gerber, Vice Chairman Jane Harman, Director, President and CEO Public members: James H.
    [Show full text]
  • Militancy in Kashmir - a Study
    Militancy in Kashmir - A Study © Vivekananda International Foundation, 2019 Vivekananda International Foundation 3, San Martin Marg, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi - 110021 Tel: 011-24121764, Fax: 011-43115450 E-mail: [email protected], Website: www.vifindia.org All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. Published by Vivekananda International Foundation. |2 Militancy in Kashmir - A Study About the Author Abhinav Pandya is a graduate in Public Policy from Cornell University. He has worked in political affairs, refugee rehabilitation, social capital and sustainable development in India and USA. He is interested in political affairs, counter-terrorism, religious extremism, international security, spirituality and comparative religions. He has been a regular contributor to the Vivekananda International Foundation (India) on issues relating to radicalisation, and security affairs. |3 Militancy in Kashmir - A Study Acknowledgement The author expresses his sincere thanks to Mr. C D Sahay (Distinguished Fellow VIF and Former Secretary to the Government of India), Lt. Gen. Rameshwar Roy (VIF), Sultan Shaheen (New Age Islam), Mr. Sushant Sareen (ORF) Mr. A. S. Dulat (Former Secretary to the Government of India), Mr. S. A. Abrahim, Mr. Shiv Murari Sahay (Addl. Secretary, NSCS), Mrs. Humra Qureishi (Journalist), Mr. Vicky Nanjappa(journalist), Maulvi Hanif Sahab (Ahle-Hadith scholar, Kashmir), Maulana Madani Sahab (General Secretary, Jamiat Ulema-I Hind), Mr. Nadir Ali (President CPJ, Kashmir), Dr. Ishrat Naved (Kashmir), Mr. Zafar Manhas (PDP, Kashmir), Mr. Waheed Para (PDP), Professor Abdul Gani Bhat (separatist), Ashiq Hussain (Kashmir Police Services), Mr.
    [Show full text]