Is Anti-Zionism Anti-Semitic?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Is Anti-Zionism Anti-Semitic? MIDDLE EAST POLICY , VOL . XVI, NO. 4, WI N TER 2009 IS ANT I -ZI ON I SM ANT I -SEM I T I C ? JEW I SH CR I T I CS SPE A K Edward C. Corrigan1 Mr. Corrigan, BA, MA, LL.B., is a lawyer certified as a specialist in Citizenship and Immigration Law and Immigration and Refugee Protection by the Law Society of Upper Canada in London, Ontario. He can be reached at [email protected] or at (519) 439-4015. hen individuals, activists of Israeli policy. Beinin, a professor of or politicians in the United history at Stanford University, is active in States and Canada criticize Jewish Voice for Peace and an editor of human-rights problems in Jewish Peace News.3 Here is what he had WIsrael or question the tenets of the political to say about the campaign to attack critics ideology of Zionism, they are attacked, and of Israel’s policies toward the Palestinians: accusations of bias and even anti-Semitism are made in an attempt to discredit them. Why discredit, defame and silence The allegation that criticism of Israel those with opposing viewpoints? I is anti-Semitic is used as an effective believe it is because the Zionist lobby knows it cannot win based on facts. political weapon. To quote one anti-Zionist An honest discussion can only lead Jewish writer: to one conclusion: The status quo in which Israel declares it alone has rights Criticizing Israel’s mistakes is and intends to impose its will on the acceptable. But questioning whether weaker Palestinians, stripping them Israel is a Jewish state with a rac- permanently of their land, resources ist apartheid system that renders and rights, cannot lead to a lasting non-Jews second rate citizens — that peace. We need an open debate and the is not acceptable. It makes little differ- freedom to discuss uncomfortable facts ence whether the criticism is based on and explore the full range of policy op- facts. Few people who cannot claim tions. Only then can we adopt a foreign Jewish descent would dare to criticize policy that serves American interests publicly. They are afraid of being ac- and one that could actually bring a just 2 cused of “anti-semitism.” peace to Palestinians and Israelis.4 Joel Beinin in “Silencing Critics Not In “Why It Is Essential for Jews to Way to Middle East Peace,” an article Speak Out as Jews, on Israel,” Internet published in the San Francisco Chronicle, blogger Philip Weiss interviewed long- discussed the campaign to silence critics time Jewish activist Dorothy Zellner. She © 2009, The Author Journal Compilation © 2009, Middle East Policy Council 146 CORRIGA N : JE W ISH CRITICS SP EAK is now working with “Jews Say No.” As caust survivors, and we say that what Weiss notes, “A lot of activists would say happened to our murdered relatives in that this is an American issue; everyone Europe should not be the reason for 5 should be engaged. And a lot of left-wing- Palestinian pain. ers would say, religion/ethnicity is a tire- some traditional category, I don’t want to Here is what Norman Solomon has identify myself in such a manner.” Zellner to say about anti-Semitism: “As with all responds to these arguments and explains forms of bigotry, anti-Semitism should be why she believes that it is essential to ad- condemned. At the same time, these days, dress the Palestinian issue “as Jews, and America's biggest anti-Semitism problem speak to other Jews as Jews”: has to do with the misuse of the label as a manipulative tactic to short-circuit debate 6 But the sight of us doing the about Washington's alliance with Israel.” unthinkable has many benefits: There He added, are a few Jews who are happy and relieved to see us because it opens the The failure to make a distinction door for them. They have felt uneasy between anti-Semitism and criti- about Israeli policies for a long time, cism of Israel routinely stifles public and seeing us seems to give them more debate. When convenient, pro-Israel courage to speak their minds. There groups in the United States will con- are also some gentiles who are happy cede that it’s possible to oppose Israeli to see us because they have been policies without being anti-Semitic. afraid for a long time of being called Yet many of Israel’s boosters reflex- anti-Semites if they criticize Israel. ively pull out the heavy artillery of Just think what it would mean if charging anti-Semitism when their a significant number of people in our position is challenged.7 country started to break through the rigid, unthinking mindset of support- Professor Michael Neumann had the ing Israel right or wrong! And just following to say about anti-Semitism: think what it means if we could have weakened the stranglehold of Israeli . to inflate the definition by includ- policies but chose not to do it! ing critics of Israel is, if not exactly Because we are Jews, we natural- incorrect, self-defeating and danger- ly have a certain currency in challeng- ous. No one can stop you from pro- ing Israeli policies. We identify with claiming all criticism of Israel anti-Se- the Jewish people, and we respect mitic. But that makes anti-Semites Jewish culture. Some of us are former out of Nelson Mandela and Bishop Zionists, and we know that Israel was Desmond Tutu, not to mention tens of never an empty land. We’ve been to thousands of Jews. Israel and Palestine more than once, The best way to reserve and we’ve seen the checkpoints and “anti-Semitism” as a term of con- the barbed wire and the guard towers demnation is to define it as hatred with our own eyes. We’ve been angry of Jews, not for what they do but and ashamed that this occupation is for what they are. It is to hate them supposedly being done to protect us. just because they belong to a certain Some of us have relatives in Israel. ethnic group. [Abraham] Foxman is Some of us are the children of Holo- 147 MIDDLE EAST POLICY , VOL . XVI, NO. 4, WI N TER 2009 right to suggest that you can be an Soros can hardly be considered a radical. anti-Semite without expressing any He is also Jewish. racist sentiments: Many anti-Semites Ben Ehrenreich, author of the novel confine themselves to expounding The Suitors, wrote in the Los Angeles false claims about Jewish control. Times on whether criticism of Zionism is But you can also, without harboring anti-Semitic hate, criticize Israel and anti-Semitic: even the Jewish community for its failures. To suppose otherwise would The characterization of anti-Zi- be to suppose an inexplicable wave onism as an “epidemic” more danger- of anti-Semitism among both Ameri- ous than anti-Semitism reveals only can and Israeli Jews, both of whom the unsustainability of the position figure prominently among the critics.8 into which Israel’s apologists have been forced. Faced with international condemnation, they seek to limit the To quote George Soros on the use of discourse, to erect walls that delineate anti-Semitism, a tactic he described as “the what can and can’t be said. most insidious argument” to silence the It’s not working. Opposing Zion- political debate on Israel’s policies toward ism is neither anti-Semitic nor par- the Palestinians: ticularly radical. It requires only that we take our own values seriously and Any politician who dares to ex- no longer, as the book of Amos has it, pose AIPAC’s influence would incur “turn justice into wormwood and hurl its wrath; so very few can be expected righteousness to the ground.” to do so. It is up to the American Establishing a secular, pluralist, Jewish community itself to rein in the democratic government in Israel and organization that claims to represent Palestine would of course mean the it. But this is not possible without first abandonment of the Zionist dream. It disposing of the most insidious argu- might also mean the only salvation for ment put forward by the defenders of the Jewish ideals of justice that date the current policies: that the critics of back to Jeremiah. Israel’s policies of occupation, control For the last several decades, and repression on the West Bank and though, it has been all but impos- in East Jerusalem and Gaza engender sible to cry out against the Israeli anti-Semitism. state without being smeared as an The opposite is the case. One of anti-Semite, or worse. To question not the myths propagated by the enemies just Israel’s actions, but the Zionist te- of Israel is that there is an all-power- nets on which the state is founded, has ful Zionist conspiracy. That is a false for too long been regarded an almost accusation. Nevertheless, that AIPAC unspeakable blasphemy. has been so successful in suppress- Yet it is no longer possible to be- ing criticism has lent some credence lieve with an honest conscience that the to such false beliefs. Demolishing deplorable conditions in which Palestin- the wall of silence that has protected ians live and die in Gaza and the West AIPAC would help lay them to rest. A Bank come as the result of specific poli- debate within the Jewish community, cies, leaders or parties on either side of instead of fomenting anti-Semitism, the impasse. The problem is fundamen- would only help diminish it.9 tal: Founding a modern state on a single 148 CORRIGA N : JE W ISH CRITICS SP EAK ethnic or religious identity in a territory However, in the mainstream North Ameri- that is ethnically and religiously diverse can press, these one-sided votes are almost leads inexorably either to a politics of never reported.
Recommended publications
  • Spencer Sunshine*
    Journal of Social Justice, Vol. 9, 2019 (© 2019) ISSN: 2164-7100 Looking Left at Antisemitism Spencer Sunshine* The question of antisemitism inside of the Left—referred to as “left antisemitism”—is a stubborn and persistent problem. And while the Right exaggerates both its depth and scope, the Left has repeatedly refused to face the issue. It is entangled in scandals about antisemitism at an increasing rate. On the Western Left, some antisemitism manifests in the form of conspiracy theories, but there is also a hegemonic refusal to acknowledge antisemitism’s existence and presence. This, in turn, is part of a larger refusal to deal with Jewish issues in general, or to engage with the Jewish community as a real entity. Debates around left antisemitism have risen in tandem with the spread of anti-Zionism inside of the Left, especially since the Second Intifada. Anti-Zionism is not, by itself, antisemitism. One can call for the Right of Return, as well as dissolving Israel as a Jewish state, without being antisemitic. But there is a Venn diagram between anti- Zionism and antisemitism, and the overlap is both significant and has many shades of grey to it. One of the main reasons the Left can’t acknowledge problems with antisemitism is that Jews persistently trouble categories, and the Left would have to rethink many things—including how it approaches anti- imperialism, nationalism of the oppressed, anti-Zionism, identity politics, populism, conspiracy theories, and critiques of finance capital—if it was to truly struggle with the question. The Left understands that white supremacy isn’t just the Ku Klux Klan and neo-Nazis, but that it is part of the fabric of society, and there is no shortcut to unstitching it.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Zionism and Antisemitism Cosmopolitan Reflections
    Anti-Zionism and Antisemitism Cosmopolitan Reflections David Hirsh Department of Sociology, Goldsmiths, University of London, New Cross, London SE14 6NW, UK The Working Papers Series is intended to initiate discussion, debate and discourse on a wide variety of issues as it pertains to the analysis of antisemitism, and to further the study of this subject matter. Please feel free to submit papers to the ISGAP working paper series. Contact the ISGAP Coordinator or the Editor of the Working Paper Series, Charles Asher Small. Working Paper Hirsh 2007 ISSN: 1940-610X © Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy ISGAP 165 East 56th Street, Second floor New York, NY 10022 United States Office Telephone: 212-230-1840 www.isgap.org ABSTRACT This paper aims to disentangle the difficult relationship between anti-Zionism and antisemitism. On one side, antisemitism appears as a pressing contemporary problem, intimately connected to an intensification of hostility to Israel. Opposing accounts downplay the fact of antisemitism and tend to treat the charge as an instrumental attempt to de-legitimize criticism of Israel. I address the central relationship both conceptually and through a number of empirical case studies which lie in the disputed territory between criticism and demonization. The paper focuses on current debates in the British public sphere and in particular on the campaign to boycott Israeli academia. Sociologically the paper seeks to develop a cosmopolitan framework to confront the methodological nationalism of both Zionism and anti-Zionism. It does not assume that exaggerated hostility to Israel is caused by underlying antisemitism but it explores the possibility that antisemitism may be an effect even of some antiracist forms of anti- Zionism.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Antisemitism in Progressive Circles?
    Denison University Denison Digital Commons Denison Student Scholarship 2021 Modern Antisemitism in Progressive Circles? Jacob Dennen Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.denison.edu/studentscholarship Modern Antisemitism in Progressive Circles? Jacob Dennen Dr. Paul A. Djupe, Advisor Senior Honors Research Abstract In recent years, anti-Zionism and anti-Israel rhetoric have become hallmarks of the American Left. Moreover, many on the Left have downplayed or denied the severity of antisemitism. This paper seeks to determine how widespread overt and latent antisemitism are among the Left. More specically, it seeks to determine if there is a double standard applied to antisemitism that could be indicative of latent antisemitism as well as if the anti-Zionist rhetoric is the result of latent antisemitism. To do so, respondents in a nationally-representative survey were given questions designed to determine overt antisemitism, as well as two dierent experiments designed to elicit latent antisemitism. The results showed that latent antisemitism does not appear for any of the ideological groups on the Left in the context of ghting discrimination. However, it does appear among Liberals as it relates to self-determination and Progressives when Israel is mentioned. These ndings help illuminate how the Left views antisemitism, the relationship between anti-Zionism and the Left, as well as how widespread latent and overt antisemitism are among the Left. 1 Introduction Where the Right ghts for freedom and liberty, the Left ghts for equality and egalitarianism. The Left has been actively involved in feminism, anti-racism, and the ght for LGBTQ rights and equality. Although each movement comes and goes in intensity and scope with the current focus on anti-racism, the Left readily calls out sexism, homophobia/transphobia, racism, and other forms of prejudice when they appear.
    [Show full text]
  • Unpacking the Global Campaign to Delegitimize Israel. Drawing The
    SWP Research Paper Gil Murciano Unpacking the Global Campaign to Delegitimize Israel Drawing the Line between Criticism of Israel and Denying Its Legitimacy Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs SWP Research Paper 7 June 2020, Berlin Abstract ∎ In the last two decades, international delegitimization of Israel has become a new mode of operation for those denying Israel’s right to exist. It encompasses a wide range of civil-society and grassroots organizations. ∎ The campaign attempts to imitate the logic of the struggle against the South African apartheid regime – hence to undermine Israel’s inter- national legitimacy in a manner that would lead to its isolation and even- tually cause it to collapse. ∎ In its current phase, the campaign functions as a long-term effort to grad- ually change the discourse and mindset of Israel’s critics in the West. Its main goal is to mainstream delegitimization – hence to reposition anti- Zionism from the radical margins into the mainstream of Western liberal- progressive circles, with specific emphasis on critics of Israel’s policies. ∎ A key strategy to mainstream delegitimization is to blur the differences between criticism of Israeli policy and challenges to Israel’s basic legiti- macy. This includes efforts to turn items of the delegitimization agenda into an integral part of the political debate about Israel. ∎ As a result, many critics of Israel’s policies end up supporting efforts that are led by the delegitimization campaign. The discussion in the West on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is gradually developing into a dichotomous encounter between supporting Israel and its policies unquestioningly or supporting anti-Zionism.
    [Show full text]
  • Jurisprudence of the New Anti-Semitism
    JURISPRUDENCE OF THE NEW ANTI-SEMITISM Kenneth L. Marcus* [I]f the watchman sees the sword advancing and does not blow the horn, so that the people are not warned, and the sword comes and destroys one of them . I will demand a reckoning for his blood from the watchman. Ezekiel 33:61 INTRODUCTION In his best-known work, Nobel laureate Elie Wiesel tells the story of his father’s death in the Shoah.2 As a young boy in Nazi- occupied Hungary, Wiesel saw the extermination begin with a decree forbidding Jews from leaving their homes, on pain of death, for three days. After this time had passed, a new decree was issued: “Every Jew must wear the yellow star.”3 When friends asked Wiesel’s father what he thought of the situation, he responded that it was not so grim. Perhaps, Wiesel comments, his father did not * Lillie and Nathan Ackerman Chair in Equality and Justice in America, Baruch College School of Public Affairs, the City University of New York, and Director, Initiative on Anti-Semitism and Anti-Israelism, the Institute for Jewish and Community Research. This Article benefits from conversations with participants in Wake Forest University Law School’s symposium on “Equality-based Perspectives on the Free Speech Norm: 21st Century Considerations,” the 2008 summer research workshop of the Center for Advanced Holocaust Studies at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, the Baruch College School of Public Affairs Faculty Research Workshop Series, comments from Richard Delgado and Stephanie Marcus, and able research assistance by Amita Dahiya. 1.
    [Show full text]
  • ISC 20, Winter 2004
    INFORMATION FOR SOCIAL CHANGE ISSUE NO. 20, Winter 2004/05 Library Documentaries, Libraries and the Working Class, Anti-Semitism, Knowledge and Social Change CONTENTS Editorial by Ruth Rikowski and John Pateman The Library in Crisis, 2002 – Introduction to Julian Samuel’s Documentary on Libraries by Vinita Ramani Vinita Ramani interviews Julian Samuel, a Montreal film-maker and writer Public Libraries and the Working Classes by John Pateman Israelis and Indians by Michael Neumann What is Anti-Semitism? by Michael Neumann Can Library Work be a Recipe for Ill Health? by Martyn Lowe Knowledge Organisation: Information, Systems and Social Change by John Lindsay Creating Value from Knowledge in the Knowledge Revolution by Ruth Rikowski Book Review – ‘The Truth’ by Mike Palecek, Reviewed by Sheila Conroy Editorial by Ruth Rikowski and John Pateman (Co-Editors of ISC) Welcome to ISC Issue No. 20. Having passed the 10-year mark, we are now looking ahead, with hope and enthusiasm towards the next 10 years! As ISC members we will continue to seek out positive social trends during this period – i.e. for signs that offer some hope towards the possibility of creating a fairer and more equal world, where the needs of people are put before profit! Once again, this issue covers a wide variety of topics, including information about a documentary film entitled The Library in Crisis, which was made in 2002, and an interview with Julian Samuel, the maker of the film. We also have articles on Public Libraries and the Working Classes; the meaning of Anti-Semitism, Library Work and Ill Health; Knowledge Organisation and Creating Value from Knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • “Progressive” Jewish Thought New Anti-Semitism
    “Progressive” Jewish Thought and the New Anti-Semitism Alvin H. Rosenfeld AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE “Progressive” Jewish Thought and the New Anti-Semitism Alvin H. Rosenfeld The American Jewish Committee protects the rights and freedoms of Jews the world over; combats bigotry and anti-Semitism and promotes human rights for all; works for the security of Israel and deepened under- standing between Americans and Israelis; advocates public policy positions rooted in American democratic values and the perspectives of the Jewish heritage; and enhances the creative vitality of the Jewish people. Founded in 1906, it is the pioneer human-relations agency in the United States. To learn more about our mission, programs, and publications, and to join and contribute to our efforts, please visit us at www.ajc.org or contact us by phone at 212-751-4000 or by e-mail at [email protected]. AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE Contents Alvin H. Rosenfeld is professor of English and Jewish Foreword v Studies and director of the Institute for Jewish Culture and the Arts, Indiana University. His most recent pub- “Progressive” Jewish Thought lication for the American Jewish Committee is Anti- and the New Anti-Semitism 1 Zionism in Great Britain and Beyond: A “Respectable” Anti-Semitism?, published in 2004. Manifestations of Anti-Semitism in the Muslim World 1 A Conflation of Interests: Manifestations of Anti-Semitism in Europe 4 What Is New in Today’s Anti-Semitism? 7 Questioning Israel’s Essence, Not Israeli Policies 8 A Jew among the Anti-Zionists: Jacqueline Rose 9 Copyright © 2006 American Jewish Committee All Rights Reserved December 2006 iii iv Contents Michael Neumann and the Accusation of Genocide with all Jews Complicit 13 Foreword Jewish Opposition to Zionism How can there be something “new” about something as old as anti- in Historical Perspective 14 Semitism? Hostility to Jews—because of their religious beliefs, their social or ethnic distinctiveness, or their imputed “racial” differ- ences—has been around for a long time.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Assimilationist and Anti-Zionist Responses to Modernity
    Embracing the Nation: Jewish Assimilationist and Anti-Zionist Responses to Modernity C.R. Power.* and Sharon Power.** 1. JEWS AND THE “MODERN QUESTION” With the idealization and proliferation of the secular Christian nation-state in Europe in the modern era, power and legitimacy were for the first time seen to flow up from the people, rather than down from G-d through his sovereign. Enlightenment and post- Enlightenment thinkers adapted Hellenic democratic theory to re-imagine the polis as a nation whose citizens were organic members of a body politic with its own, presumably unique, democratic will. The normative idea that a “people” should be self-governing, that in fact any other form of political arrangement was inherently unenlightened and oppressive, informed the new delineation of states, borders and sovereignty. Member- ship in a people, one’s personal sense of collective identity, became of crucial political importance. One people, one nation became the rule. Thus arose “The Jewish Question,” a consideration of what the presence of the Jews meant for the modern conception of nationhood. The idea of the Israelites representing a distinct “people” became a key problem of modernity. As the universalism of Enlightenment thinking was transformed by 19th century socialist thinkers, Jewish difference, as collective difference, remained a central problem, deemed anathema to the socialist project, this time preventing the realization of the international socialist collective rather than of the liberal democratic nation. Socialists see
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Fire: the Fall of WTC 7 Tin America
    CounterPunchTells the Facts and Names the Names $2.50 October 16-31, 2006 Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St. Clair VOL. 13, NO. 18 ON CONSPIRACIES “An oil well fire under a loaded bridge.” BY ALEXANDER COCKBURN here are plenty of real conspiracies Dark Fire: the Fall of WTC 7 Tin America. Why make up fake ones? Every few years, property czars and city government in New York conspire to BY MANUEL GARCIA, JR. withhold fire company responses, so that right, windless September morn- within a block east of WTC 7. A sec- enough of a neighborhood burns down for ing in Manhattan, looking south tion of the fuselage from that plane fell the poor to quit and for profitable gentri- B and slightly west across Vesey atop WTC 5, the nine-story North Plaza fication to ensue. That’s a conspiracy to Street from the 12th floor of WTC 7. Building east of the US Customs House. commit ethnic cleansing, also murder. The eight story U.S. Customs House (See FEMA 403, “World Trade Center It’s happening today in Brooklyn, (WTC 6) lies directly across the way, Building Performance Study: Data Col- even as similar ethnic cleansing and and beyond it the North Tower (WTC lection, Preliminary Observations, and gentrification are scheduled in San 1), slightly rightward to the west, with Recommendations, (second printing),” Francisco. Bayview Hunters Point is the South Tower (WTC 2) even further September 2002.) the last large black community in the off, left of WTC 1 to the east. Some would wonder, “Am I shud- Bay Area, sitting on bay front property.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Pollan on Food Why We Should Keep the Fed
    home / subscribe / donate / books / t-shirts / search / links / feedback / events / faq CounterPunch Print Edition Exclusive! Michael Pollan on Food "The Next Big Political Movement" Read Harry Kreisler’s brilliant interview with Pollan. There are many pearls, starting with why “nutrition” is bunk. Also, from the annals of classical espionage: Igor Atamanenko on How the Americans were bugged through a Trojan Horse. Get your new edition today by subscribing online or calling 1-800-840-3683 Contributions to CounterPunch are tax-deductible. Click here to make a donation. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe Now! CounterPunch books and t-shirts make great presents. Order CounterPunch By Email For Only $35 a Year ! Today's Stories May 10, 2010 Now Available from CounterPunch Books! May 10, 2010 This is the Print Size Banks and Credit Card Companies Like for Disclosure Andrew Cockburn Why We Should Keep the Fed Away From the Why We Should Keep the Fed Consumer: the Hurt Incident Away From the Consumer: the By ANDREW COCKBURN Hurt Incident Marjorie Cohn Kagan Will Move Buoyed by the thrill of seeing Goldman Sachs squirm just a little at the the Court Further witness table it may be that a financial “reform” bill emerges from congress to the Right some time this summer. Without a doubt, human wave assaults by Wall Street’s famously effective lobbyists will produce many amendments and Jeffrey Blankfort alterations to the draft legislation currently under debate. Some of these The Last may be momentous in effect yet scarcely visible to anyone but a securities Democratic lawyer – think the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, slipped through Primary Worth congress without debate in December 2000, that unleashed credit default Watching swaps on a defenseless world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: a Historiographic Essay
    The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: A Historiographic Essay by Melissa Thiel The path to Israel declaring itself a nation in 1948 was complicated by world war, religious beliefs, and imperialism. The origins and contributing factors of the Palestine/Israel conflict have been the center of debate between Pro-Israel and Pro- Palestine historians. These historians have competing interpretations regarding historical and religious claims to the land, the goal of the Zionist movement, and the impact of British involvement. Pro-Israel and Pro-Palestine historians are deeply divided on every aspect of the conflict which further reiterates the deep divide among the people that live in arguably the most holy place in the world. The history of the region of Israel is long and complicated. According to biblical scripture, the children of Israel inhabited the holy land from 1400 BCE until the Roman Empire removed them in 136 CE. It was during this time that the name of the region was changed from Israel to Syria Palestina and the Arab people took control. Palestine was ruled by an Arab majority under the Turkish-Ottoman Empire until they were defeated at the end of World War I. It was during this time that the British made multiple promises to both the Palestinian Arabs and the Jewish Israelites that began the war known at the Israel-Palestine conflict. Hitler’s war against the Jews further complicated the fight over Palestine due to the Jews fleeing persecution in Europe and their need for a homeland. Arabs were in fear of losing their land to Jews and thus ensued in a battle to control the area.
    [Show full text]
  • How the FBI Spied on Edward Said Ave Ied in the Ar H D W ? by DAVID PRICE 30,000? No
    $2.50 CounterPunchTells the Facts and Names the Names December 1-15, 2005 Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St. Clair VOL. 12, NO. 21 HOW MANY IRAQIS How the FBI Spied on Edward Said AVE IED IN THE AR H D W ? BY DAVID PRICE 30,000? NO. 100,000? he FBI has a long, ignoble tradition We believed that our phones were tapped for a BY ANDREW COCKBURN of monitoring and harassing Amer-i long time, but it never bothered us because we resident Bush’s recent off-hand sum Tca’s top intellectuals. While people knew we were hiding nothing.” Pmation of the number of Iraqis who ranging from Albert Einstein, William Carlos The FBI’s first record of Edward Said have so far died as a result of the U.S. Williams to Martin Luther King have been appears in a February 1971 domestic security invasion and occupation as “30,000, subjected to FBI surveillance, there remains investigation of another unidentified individual. more or less” was quite certainly an an under-accounting of the ways in which this The FBI collected photographs of Said from under-estimate. The true number is monitoring at times hampered the reception the State Department’s passport division and probably hitting around 180,000 by now, of their work. various news agencies. Said’s “International with a possibility, as we shall see, that it In response to my request under the Free- Security” FBI file was established when an has reached as high as half a million. Al- dom of Information Act, filed on behalf of informant gave the FBI a program from the most as soon as President Bush, speak- CounterPunch, the FBI recently released 147 October 1971 Boston Convention of the ing in Philadelphia in mid-December, of Said’s 238-page FBI file.
    [Show full text]