DOCSLIB.ORG

Psychology May 20, 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Psychology May 20, 2013 Outline of Psychology May 20, 2013 Contents SOCI>Psychology.............................................................................................................................................................. 3 SOCI>Psychology>Attitude.......................................................................................................................................... 3 SOCI>Psychology>Behavior ........................................................................................................................................ 4 SOCI>Psychology>Behavior>Handedness .............................................................................................................. 6 SOCI>Psychology>Behavior>Motivation ............................................................................................................... 7 SOCI>Psychology>Behavior>Motivation>Goal ................................................................................................. 7 SOCI>Psychology>Behavior>Motivation>Reinforcement ................................................................................. 8 SOCI>Psychology>Behavior>Theories ................................................................................................................... 8 SOCI>Psychology>Behavior>Kinds........................................................................................................................ 9 SOCI>Psychology>Behavior>Kinds>Aggression ............................................................................................ 12 SOCI>Psychology>Behavior>Kinds>Conflict.................................................................................................. 13 SOCI>Psychology>Behavior>Kinds>Displacement ......................................................................................... 14 SOCI>Psychology>Behavior>Kinds>Habit ...................................................................................................... 14 SOCI>Psychology>Behavior>Kinds>Humor ................................................................................................... 14 SOCI>Psychology>Behavior>Kinds>Novelty .................................................................................................. 15 SOCI>Psychology>Behavior>Kinds>Pain Infliction ........................................................................................ 15 SOCI>Psychology>Behavior>Kinds>Stimulus Response ................................................................................ 15 SOCI>Psychology>Behavior>Kinds>Tropism ................................................................................................. 16 SOCI>Psychology>Child Psychology ........................................................................................................................ 16 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition ..................................................................................................................................... 17 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Cognitive Style ..................................................................................................... 18 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Cognitive Style>Orientation ............................................................................ 18 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Cognitive Style>Time ..................................................................................... 18 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Cognitive Style>Reference .............................................................................. 18 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Cognitive Style>Thinking ............................................................................... 18 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Attention ............................................................................................................... 18 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Attention>Forms.............................................................................................. 22 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Attention>Properties ........................................................................................ 23 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Attention>Theories .......................................................................................... 23 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Emotion ................................................................................................................ 24 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Emotion>Theories ........................................................................................... 28 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Emotion>Kinds................................................................................................ 28 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Imagination .......................................................................................................... 30 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Learning ............................................................................................................... 32 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Learning>Problems ......................................................................................... 35 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Learning>Techniques ...................................................................................... 35 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Learning>Theories .......................................................................................... 35 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Learning>Kinds ............................................................................................... 36 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Learning>Kinds>Verbal ............................................................................. 38 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Learning>Kinds>Skill ................................................................................ 39 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Learning>Kinds>Concept ........................................................................... 39 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Learning>Kinds>Drive Reduction.............................................................. 41 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Learning>Kinds>Effort .............................................................................. 41 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Learning>Kinds>Conditioning ................................................................... 42 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Learning>Kinds>Training .......................................................................... 45 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Memory ................................................................................................................ 45 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Memory>Anatomy .......................................................................................... 50 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Memory>Errors ............................................................................................... 50 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Memory>Interference ...................................................................................... 51 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Memory>Interference>Theory ................................................................... 52 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Memory>Processes .......................................................................................... 52 1 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Memory>Properties ......................................................................................... 53 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Memory>Properties>Hypothesis ................................................................ 54 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Memory>Properties>List Learning ............................................................ 54 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Memory>Properties>Inference ................................................................... 55 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Memory>Recall ............................................................................................... 55 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Memory>Recall>Model.............................................................................. 56 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Memory>Recall>Cue ................................................................................. 56 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Memory>Kinds................................................................................................ 57 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Memory>Theories ........................................................................................... 61 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Memory>Theories>Association ................................................................. 63 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Memory>Theories>Recall .......................................................................... 64 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Memory>Theories>Sound .......................................................................... 65 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Memory>Theories>Thinking Capacity ...................................................... 65 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Memory>Theories>Working Memory ....................................................... 66 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Perception ............................................................................................................. 66 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Perception>Theories ........................................................................................ 70 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Perception>Features ........................................................................................ 70 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Perception>Masking ........................................................................................ 71 SOCI>Psychology>Cognition>Perception>Perceptual
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Executive Function and Attention Profiles of Children with ADHD And
    Executive Function and Attention Profiles of Children with ADHD and / or Reading Disorder: Developmental Neuropsychology and Genetic Contributions Student: Gian Marco Marzocchi Supervisor: Prof. Tim Shallice September 2006 Index Section A: Introduction – Review of the literature Chapter 1. Frontal lobe processes and their development 8 1.1 Neuroanatomy of Executive Function 8 1.2 Language processes 13 1.3 Memory functioning 14 1.4 Anterior Attention Functions 17 1.4.1 Attentional switching 18 1.4.2 Selective Attention 19 1.4.3 Sustained Attention 20 1.5 Strategy Application 21 1.6 Overall summary on adult neuropsychological literature 23 1.7 Development of frontal lobe processes 24 1.8 Conclusive considerations on executive function studies with children 29 Chapter 2. What is Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder 32 2.1 North American versus European Concepts of ADHD 33 2.2 Comorbidity 35 2.3 Attempts to understand the enigma: current neurocognitive models 37 2.3.1 The behavioral inhibitory deficit model by Barkley 37 2.3.2 The cognitive-energetic model by Sergeant and Van der Meere 39 2.3.3 The Attentional Networks model by Swanson and Posner 40 2.3.4 The Dual Pathway model by Sonuga-Barke 41 2 Chapter 3. The neuropsychology of children with ADHD 46 3.1 Anatomic brain imaging studies of ADHD 46 3.2 Structural Imaging Studies in ADHD 47 3.2.1 Total Cerebral Volume 47 3.2.2 Corpus Callosum 48 3.2.3 Prefrontal Cortex 48 3.2.4 Caudate Nucleus 48 3.2.5 Putamen 49 3.2.6 Globus Pallidus 49 3.2.7 Cerebellum 49 3.3 Functional Brain Imaging Studies 50 3.4 Discussion of the brain studies 52 3.5 Theories of the neuropsychological mechanisms responsible for ADHD 54 3.5.1 Response Disinhibition 54 3.5.2 Executive Dysfunction 56 3.5.3 Selective Attention and Attentional Disinhibition 56 3.5.4 Memory impairments 57 3.6 Cognitive Neuropsychology of ADHD subtypes 61 Chapter 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Embodied Visual Recognition: Learning to Move for Amodal Perception
    Embodied Visual Recognition Jianwei Yang1‹, Zhile Ren1‹, Mingze Xu2, Xinlei Chen3, David Crandall2, Devi Parikh1;3 Dhruv Batra1;3 1Georgia Institute of Technology, 2Indiana University, 3Facebook AI Research. https://www.cc.gatech.edu/˜jyang375/evr.html Abstract Passive visual systems typically fail to recognize objects in the amodal setting where they are heavily occluded. In contrast, humans and other embodied agents have the abil- ity to move in the environment, and actively control the viewing angle to better understand object shapes and se- mantics. In this work, we introduce the task of Embodied Visual Recognition (EVR): An agent is instantiated in a 3D Figure 1: The task of Embodied Visual Recognition: An environment close to an occluded target object, and is free agent is spawned close to an occluded target object in a 3D to move in the environment to perform object classification, environment, and asked for visual recognition, i.e., predict- amodal object localization, and amodal object segmenta- ing class label, amodal bounding box and amodal mask of tion. To address this, we develop a new model called Em- the target object. The agent is free to move around to aggre- bodied Mask R-CNN, for agents to learn to move strate- gate information for better visual recognition. gically to improve their visual recognition abilities. We conduct experiments using the House3D environment. Ex- perimental results show that: 1) agents with embodiment Recently, the dominant paradigm for object recognition (movement) achieve better visual recognition performance and amodal perception has been based on single image. than passive ones; 2) in order to improve visual recognition Though leveraging the advances of deep learning, visual abilities, agents can learn strategical moving paths that are systems still fail to recognize object and its shape from sin- different from shortest paths.
    [Show full text]
  • Autolay: Benchmarking Amodal Layout Estimation for Autonomous Driving
    2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) October 25-29, 2020, Las Vegas, NV, USA (Virtual) AutoLay: Benchmarking amodal layout estimation for autonomous driving Kaustubh Mani∗1,2, N. Sai Shankar∗1, Krishna Murthy Jatavallabhula3,4, and K. Madhava Krishna1,2 1Robotics Research Center, KCIS, 2IIIT Hyderabad, 3Mila - Quebec AI Institute, Montreal, 4Université de Montréal Fig. 1: Amodal layout estimation is the task of estimating a semantic occupancy map in bird’s eye view, given a monocular image or video. The term amodal implies that we estimate occupancy and semantic labels even for parts of the world that are occluded in image space. In this work, we introduce AutoLay, a new dataset and benchmark for this task. AutoLay provides annotations in 3D, in bird’s eye view, and in image space. A sample annotated sequence (from the KITTI dataset [1]) is shown below. We provide high quality labels for sidewalks, vehicles, crosswalks, and lanes. We evaluate several approaches on sequences from the KITTI [1] and Argoverse [2] datasets. Abstract— Given an image or a video captured from a in [3]). Amodal perception, as studied by cognitive scientists, monocular camera, amodal layout estimation is the task of refers to the phenomenon of “imagining" or “hallucinating" predicting semantics and occupancy in bird’s eye view. The parts of the scene that do not result in sensory stimulation. In term amodal implies we also reason about entities in the scene that are occluded or truncated in image space. While the context of urban driving, we formulate the amodal layout several recent efforts have tackled this problem, there is a estimation task as predicting a bird’s eye view semantic map lack of standardization in task specification, datasets, and from monocular images that explicitly reasons about entities evaluation protocols.
    [Show full text]
  • Prefrontal Cortex and Neurological Impairments of Active Thought Tim
    Prefrontal cortex and neurological impairments of active thought 1 2 Tim Shallice and Lisa Cipolotti 1. Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK and SISSA, Trieste, Italy. email: [email protected] 2. Neuropsychology Department, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1, UK and Dipartimento di Psicologia, Universita di Palermo, Italy. email: [email protected] Short title: Impairments of active thought Corresponding Author: Tim Shallice, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK. email: [email protected] 1 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION Overall perspective Why neuropsychology? The neuropsychological approach to frontal functions. BROAD BRUSH ASPECTS OF ACTIVE THOUGHT Dual system brain-based models of cognitive control Active thought and intelligence Active thought and language ESSENTIAL PREREQUISITES FOR ACTIVE THOUGHT Volition and concentration Set-Switching and response inhibition Active monitoring and checking Working memory FORMS OF ACTIVE THOUGHT Abstraction Deduction Reasoning in well-structured and less well-structured problem-spaces From lateral transformations to strategy shifts Planning for future action THEORETICAL CONCLUSIONS 2 Keywords Active thought, neuropsychology, prefrontal cortex, supervisory system, reasoning, lateralisation of function Abstract The paper reviews the effects of lesions to the frontal cortex in so far as they impact on the ability to carry out active thought, namely to reason, think flexibly, produce strategies and formulate and realise plans. How relevant neuropsychological studies should be carried out and why are discussed. The relation between active thought and each of intelligence and language are considered. The following basic processes necessary for effective active thought are reviewed: concentration, set-switching, inhibiting potentiated responses and monitoring and checking.
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive Neuropsychology Deep Dyslexia
    This article was downloaded by: [University of Toronto] On: 16 February 2010 Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 911810122] Publisher Psychology Press Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37- 41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Cognitive Neuropsychology Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713659042 Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology David C. Plaut ab; Tim Shallice c a Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA b Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA c University College London, London, UK To cite this Article Plaut, David C. and Shallice, Tim(1993) 'Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology', Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10: 5, 377 — 500 To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/02643299308253469 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02643299308253469 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Theories of Amodal Perception
    Four Theories of Amodal Perception Bence Nanay ([email protected]) Syracuse University, Department of Philosophy, 535 Hall of Languages Syracuse, NY 13244 USA Abstract perceive (Clarke, 1965; Strawson, 1979; Noë, 2004, p. 76). Do we perceive the entire cat? Or those parts of the cat that are visible, that is, a tailless cat? I do not intend to answer We are aware of those parts of a cat that are occluded behind any of these questions here. My question is not about what a fence. The question is how we represent these occluded we perceive but about the way in which we represent those parts of perceived objects: this is the problem of amodal parts of objects that are not visible to us. perception. I will consider four theories and compare their explanatory power: (i) we see them, (ii) we have non- Also, I need to emphasize that amodal perception is not a perceptual beliefs about them, (iii) we have immediate weird but rare subcase of our everyday awareness of the perceptual access to them and (iv) we visualize them. I point world. Almost all episodes of perception include an amodal out that the first three of these views face both empirical and component. For example, typically, only three sides of a conceptual objections. I argue for the fourth account, non-transparent cube are visible. The other three are not according to which we visualize the occluded parts of visible – we are aware of them ‘amodally’. The same goes perceived objects. Finally, I consider some important for houses or for any ordinary objects.
    [Show full text]
  • Anamorphosis Implications AMODAL PERCEPTION
    44 Amodal Perception Anamorphosis partly inspired by the “transactional approach” of philosopher John Dewey (who first saw the demon- The Ames demonstrations were not unprecedented, strations in 1946, and then corresponded with in the sense that they have much in common with Ames until 1951). Ames believed, as Dewey did, an historic artistic distortion technique called that we are not passive recipients of a given reality, anamorphosis, and to other perspective illusions but instead are active participants in a give-and-take employed in the design of theatrical sets. exchange (a “transaction”) in which split-second In anamorphic constructions, the image looks assumptions are made about the nature of reality. distorted when viewed frontally (as is customary) The demonstrations have also had lasting effects but correctly proportioned when seen from the on other aspects of culture. Even today, one or side (often indicated by a peephole). For example, more of the demonstrations are invariably men- Ames was well acquainted with the work of scien- tioned in textbooks on perception, and it is not tist and philosopher Hermann von Helmholtz, uncommon for one or more to appear in television who more than 50 years before had noted that an documentaries, video clips, cinematic special infinite variety of distorted rooms could be devised effects, or advertising commercials. that, from a monocular peephole, would nonethe- less seem to be normal. Roy R. Behrens Far in advance of Helmholtz, this same kind of visual distortion was used as early as 1485 by See also Magic and Perception; Object Perception; Leonardo da Vinci (and probably even earlier by Pictorial Depiction and Perception Chinese artists) as an offshoot of perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL for ADVANCED STUDIES Cognitive
    INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL FOR ADVANCED STUDIES Cognitive Neuroscience Sector, SISSA-ISAS, Trieste, Italy. * Bridging Access to Consciousness, Cognitive Control and Metacognition : Toward an Application to schizophrenia Sarah Kouhou, PhD Thesis, * Supervisor: Tim Shallice, PhD, Professor * External Reviewers: Paolo Brambilla, M.D PhD Jérôme Sackur, M.D PhD Acknowledgments I would like to thank all the people who helped me, knowingly or not, to complete that work: My supervisor, Tim, for his huge patience and his critical empiricism; my aunt, Marie, for having been there when I needed ; my friends or colleagues in SISSA, especially Georgette and Shima, for their kindness; the Abdu Salam Center of Theoretical Physics (ICTP) in general and overall the library staff, just for providing me with a nice space for work, serious, stimulating and convivial. I also thank Guillaume, for having given me energy and force at the very right moment. I am also very thankful to Paolo, who showed an interest in my proposal to work with patients and who contributed a lot to accessing the Health Center. Elisa Maso, who was very efficient and available to make me interact with patients, although she was very busy. I am also thankful to the patients themselves, who devoted their time and psychological resources, for free. I thank also all the subjects who participated to my tiresome experiments, with patience, kindness and seriousness. Table of contents PART I: Bridging Access to Consciousness, Cognitive Control and Metacognition, A dense overview 1 1. Demonstrating the existence of unconscious processing before all 5 2. Consciousness as a capacity-limited Global Workspace 9 2.1 Three pieces of behavioral evidence for a central Global Workspace 2.2 Neural correlates of a central Global Workspace: a causal role of prefrontal cortex? 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Perception Glossary
    Visual Perception Glossary Amodal perception The part of an object that is not visible because occlu- ded can be amodally perceived. Amodal perception is different and one step removed from modal percepti- on of real or illusory contours. Apparent motion When an object is presented at two different locati- ons after a brief time interval observers perceive mo- tion. The fi rst empirical investigation was carried out by Sigmund Exner . His aim, as well as the subsequent work by Max Wertheimer , was in establishing that motion was a basic sensation. Attention Refers to the selective processing of some aspect of information, while ignoring other information. The sudden onset of a stimulus can capture attention, but people can also exert some control on where they di- rect their attention. Bi-stable stimulus A particular stimulus that can produce two percepts over time, even though it is unchanged as a stimulus. An example is the Necker cube . Brightness Brightness refers to perception of how much light is coming from a given surface or object. A brighter objects refl ects more light than a less bright object. However perception of brightness is not fully deter- mined by luminance (see Illusory contours). 192 Visual Perception Glossary Cerebral lobe The cerebral cortex of the human brain is divided into four main lobes. Frontal (at the front), occipital (at the back), temporal (on the sides) and parietal (at the top). Consciousness Sorry this is too hard, your guess is as good as mine. Cortex The cortex is the outer layer of the brain . In most mammals the cortex is folded and this allows the surface to have a greater area given in the confi ned space available inside the skull.
    [Show full text]
  • Amodal Detection of 3D Objects: Inferring 3D Bounding Boxes from 2D Ones in RGB-Depth Images
    Amodal Detection of 3D Objects: Inferring 3D Bounding Boxes from 2D Ones in RGB-Depth Images Zhuo Deng Longin Jan Latecki Temple University, Philadelphia, USA [email protected], [email protected] Abstract localizations from monocular imagery [6, 13, 20, 3], and 3D object recognitions on CAD models [29, 27]. But these This paper addresses the problem of amodal perception works either rely on a huge number of ideal 3D graphics of 3D object detection. The task is to not only find object models by assuming the locations are known or are inclined localizations in the 3D world, but also estimate their phys- to fail in cluttered environments where occlusions are very ical sizes and poses, even if only parts of them are visible common while depth orders are uncertain. in the RGB-D image. Recent approaches have attempted The recent advent of Microsoft Kinect and similar sen- to harness point cloud from depth channel to exploit 3D sors alleviated some of these challenges, and thus enabled features directly in the 3D space and demonstrated the su- an exciting new direction of approaches to 3D object detec- periority over traditional 2.5D representation approaches. tion [18, 17, 12, 11, 19, 25, 24]. Equipped with an active We revisit the amodal 3D detection problem by sticking infrared structured light sensor, Kinect is able to provide to the 2.5D representation framework, and directly relate much more accurate depth locations of objects associated 2.5D visual appearance to 3D objects. We propose a novel with their visual appearances. The RGB-Depth detection 3D object detection system that simultaneously predicts ob- approaches can be roughly categorized into two groups ac- jects’ 3D locations, physical sizes, and orientations in in- cording to the way to formulate feature representations from door scenes.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society — Volume 14 — November 2009 50Th Annual Meeting — November 19–22, 2009 — Boston, Massachusetts
    Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society — Volume 14 — November 2009 50th Annual Meeting — November 19–22, 2009 — Boston, Massachusetts Papers 1–7 Friday Morning Scene Processing randomly positioned. When targets were systematically located within Grand Ballroom, Friday Morning, 8:00–9:35 scenes, search for them became progressively more efficient. Learning was abstracted away from bedrooms and transferred to a living room, Chaired by Carrick C. Williams, Mississippi State University where the target was on a sofa pillow. These contingencies were explicit and led to central tendency biases in memory for precise target positions. 8:00–8:15 (1) These results broaden the scope of conditions under which contextual Encoding and Visual Memory: Is Task Always Irrelevant? CAR- cuing operates and demonstrate for the first time that semantic memory RICK C. WILLIAMS, Mississippi State University—Although some plays a causal and independent role in the learning of associations be- aspects of encoding (e.g., presentation time) appear to have an effect tween objects in real-world scenes. on visual memories, viewing task (incidental or intentional encoding) does not. The present study investigated whether different encoding 9:20–9:35 (5) manipulations would impact visual memories equally for all objects Visual Memory: Confidence, Accuracy, and Recollection of Specific in a conjunction search (e.g., targets, color distractors, object category Details. GEOFFREY R. LOFTUS, University of Washington, MARK T. distractors, or distractors unrelated to the target).
    [Show full text]
  • Tim SHALLICE SISSA, Trieste, Italy & University College London, UK
    Psychologica Belgica 2009, 49-2&3, 73-84. THE DECLINING INFLUENCE OF COGNITIVE THEORISING: ARE THE CAUSES INTELLECTUAL OR SOCIO-POLITICAL? Tim SHALLICE SISSA, Trieste, Italy & University College London, UK A rough division is drawn between the cognitive and biomedical strand of theorising concerning cognitive processes. It is asserted that the cognitive strand is losing influence by comparison with the biomedical strand. Three types of intellectual reasons why this might be occurring are considered and each is rejected as inadequate. Three types of socio-political reasons are then proposed as important factors. Introduction Consider phonological awareness and its relation to learning to read (Liberman, Shankweiler, Fischer, & Carter, 1974; Morais, Cary, Alegria, & Bertelson, 1979), and how later theorists have assessed the significance of this discovery. “The discovery of a strong relationship between children’s phonological awareness and their progress in learning to read is one of the great successes of modern psychology” (Bryant & Goswami, 1987). “The importance of the concept of phonological awareness in theorising about reading acquisition and dyslexia can hardly be overestimated” (Castles & Coltheart, 2004). Where, though, can we place a concept like phonological awareness in the set of ideas and methods that constitute the scientific study of the mind? How important will it turn out to be in our future understand- ing of mind? This paper will not be concerned with phonological awareness per se but with the cognitive type of theorising of which it is such a fine example. I will argue that there are two major strands – the cognitive and the biomedical – in the historical development of the set of ideas and methods that constitute the scientific study of the mind.
    [Show full text]