High-Speed Rail

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

High-Speed Rail Moving Ahead in FY2013 The Obama Administration proposes spending $2.5 billion for network development and rail system preservation in FY2013, and an additional $6 billion for immediate investments in new equipment, stations, and rail infrastructure. To reach the goal of providing 80 percent of Americans with access to the high-speed rail network within 25 years, the Administration proposes a A Market-Based Investment Strategy $53 billion investment in high-speed and intercity passenger rail over the The Federal Railroad Administration’s market-based approach reflects the differing needs next six years. and characteristics of corridors throughout the nation through a three-tiered passenger rail strategy. Core Express services: frequent trains at 125-250+ mph in the nation’s densest and most populous regions. Regional services: 90-125 mph service between mid-sized and large cities. Emerging services: up to 90 mph service connecting communities to the passenger rail network and providing a foundation for future corridor development. Additional Resources An Inventory of HSR Criticisms With Suggested Responses http://www.apta.com/resources/reportsandpublications/Documents/HSR-Defense.pdf The Case for Business Investment in High-Speed Rail http://www.apta.com/resources/reportsandpublications/documents/HSRPub_final.pdf New Polling, papers and more http://www.apta.com/gap/policyresearch/highspeedrail/ Federal Railroad Administration http://www.fra.dot.gov High-Speed Rail—On the Move in America For more information contact: Darnell Chadwick Grisby, MPP Director, Policy Development and Research Office (202) 496-4887 [email protected] Printed on 30% post-consumer content processed chlorine free with vegetable-based inks Midwest Southeast In February Station neighborhood with development Over the last sev- Moving Toward a Stronger Economy 2012, 110 mph of a number of businesses, residential eral years, train rid- service began condominiums, a new hotel, and a mod- ership has increased High-speed rail is critical to America’s economic future. Congestion between Chicago ern medical center. In all, the new service in the Southeast as on our highways and runways already costs $130 billion a year, and and Kalamazoo, MI, is expected to generate more than $7 the states of Virginia marking the first ex- billion in development, 10,000 new jobs, and North Carolina our population is expected to grow by another 100 million people Americans Want pansion of regional high-speed rail outside and $75 million in annual state revenue. have expanded service. This year, North in the next 40 years. That is the key rationale behind the Obama of the Northeast Corridor. This increase in In another initiative, the Federal Railroad Carolina will begin a $290 million corridor High-Speed Rail Administration’s more than $10 billion investment in high-speed and speed will cut 10 to 20 minutes from travel Administration, in collaboration with upgrade program that will reduce trip passenger rail projects across the country. times along this segment of the line alone, states, Amtrak, and the Northeast Corridor times between Charlotte and Raleigh, allow With high-speed rail being and within the next three years Amtrak for more daily round trips, and improve developed in five mega-regions, Commission, is developing the first com- Rail projects are moving forward in 32 states, laying the foundation will expand 110 mph service from Kalama- prehensive, corridor-wide planning and on-time performance. The two states are travel choices will expand for future economic growth by creating construction and manufactur- zoo to the central and eastern regions of environmental effort for the Northeast also moving forward with the pre-requisite exponentially for most Americans. ing jobs for American workers and attracting small businesses and Michigan. Once complete, the modernized Corridor in decades. Additional projects environmental and engineering work for Nearly two thirds of this population service will cut nearly two hours from the projects that will allow trains traveling new development. Expenditures for high-speed rail are estimated to all along the corridor will replace aging report interest in traveling by high- Detroit-Chicago run. bridges, expand constrained stations, and between Raleigh and Washington, DC, to speed rail, and the figure soars to support 24,000 jobs for each billion dollars of investment. In addition upgrade track and power systems. These reach average speeds similar to the Acela The Obama Administration’s high-speed 75 percent among those in the to generating more highly skilled transportation-industry jobs, high- improvements will reduce trip times, trains on the Northeast Corridor. rail investment is enabling workers to lay 18-24 age bracket. Their reasons: improve reliability and safety, and allow for speed rail will create a revitalized domestic transportation industry 96 miles of track between Chicago and additional segments capable of 160 mph faster trip times, lower cost, supplying more products and services, with more dollars retained in St. Louis. The project will result in up to one California service. greater convenience, and a more our economy. As an energy-efficient choice in transportation, high- hour of passenger travel-time savings by The California High-Speed Rail Authority environmentally friendly alternative projects 600,000 speed rail will reduce greenhouse gas emissions to help meet national 2014 and improve on-time performance by to other transportation modes. upgrading speeds to 110 mph on portions Pacific Northwest full-time construc- and international climate goals. of the corridor. An estimated 5,000 jobs More than $800 tion jobs will be More than 40 projects totaling $2.9 billion are under construction or are expected to be created through this million in federal created over the project. In Normal, IL, improved rail ser- course of building set to break ground this year. funding is already vice on this corridor has already gener- transforming his- and 450,000 perma- ated $200 million in private investment in toric train stations in nent new jobs will result from high-speed Vancouver, BC Progress in America’s the city’s central business district, where Portland and Seattle, rail related economic growth over the next Seattle the occupancy rate is now 100 percent. and putting people back to work while 25 years. The project will connect major Spokane Mega-Regions improving the region’s rail capacity and cities that currently do not have significant Portland Fargo Montreal Nearly 85 percent of rail investments to service reliability. With a rapidly growing air service, connect suburban commuting Brunswick Northeast Eugene date are substantially concentrated in sheds with central cities, and will connect Minneapolis/St. Paul Improvements are population and a tripling of ridership along Albany Boston the largest central cities while reducing Bualo five key mega-regions: the Midwest, the underway along Amtrak’s Cascades route since 1995, de- MIlwaukee Detroit Northeast Corridor, the Pacific Northwest, Northeast Corridor mand for passenger rail service is surging airport congestion. New York New Salt Lake City Iowa City Harrisburg Haven the Southeast Corridor, and California. routes that serve in the Pacific Northwest. Ultimately, Wash- San Omaha Cleveland Sacramento Chicago PIttsburg Philadelphia Francisco Baltimore High-speed intercity passenger rail nearly 50 million ington and Oregon hope to provide hourly Washington DC San Jose Denver Kansas City improvements are underway in all mega- people in the densely rail service between Portland and Seattle, St. Louis Cincinnati Fresno Richmond regions, which represent approximately populated regions around Washington, while also shaving an hour off today’s trip San Luis Bakerseld Raleigh Expenditures for high-speed rail are Obispo 65 percent of the U.S. population and DC, Philadelphia, New York, Boston, and time. The time savings will make passenger Oklahoma City Charlotte Los Angeles Riverside Atlanta stand to absorb the bulk of future beyond. Projects currently in construction rail along the corridor very competitive estimated to support 24,000 jobs for Albuquerque population growth. These densely will enhance speeds and improve safety with air travel between the two cities and San Diego $1 billion dollars of investment. Tucson Memphis populated mega-regions will demand on the Keystone line between Harrisburg will decrease traffic congestion along the El Paso Dallas/Ft. Worth new streamlined transportation choices and Philadelphia; increase speeds on the Interstate 5 corridor, reducing the region’s Core Express (125-250+mph) that avoid highway congestion and the Vermonter line between Washington, carbon emissions. High-speed rail will create a Houston Regional (90-125mph) New Orleans Orlando high cost of air travel. At the same time, DC, and St. Albans, VT; and expand the Emerging (Up to 90mph) San Antonio revitalized domestic transportation Existing intercity rail routes Tampa rural and small urban communities will Downeaster service from Boston north to State receiving HSIPR Grants industry supplying more products Miami benefit from the increased transfer points Freeport and Brunswick, ME. Construction and feeder services connecting with new workers in Brunswick are now laying track and services, with more dollars high-speed rail corridors. for the first rail service to Portland and retained in our economy. Boston since 1959. Private investment has already gravitated toward the Brunswick.
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 2 Existing Conditions Summary
    Final Report New Haven Hartford Springfield Commuter Rail Implementation Study 2 Existing Conditions Chapter 2 Existing Conditions Summary This chapter is a summary of the existing conditions report, necessary for comprehension of the remaining chapters. The entire report can be found in Appendix B of this report. 2.1 Existing Passenger Services on the Line The only existing passenger rail service on the Springfield Line is a regional service operated by Amtrak. Schedules for alternatives in Chapter 3 and the Recommended Action in Chapter 4 include current Amtrak service. Most Amtrak service on the line is shuttle trains, running between Springfield and New Haven, where they connect with other Amtrak Northeast Corridor trains. One round-trip train each day operates through the corridor to Boston to the north and Washington to the south. One round trip train each day operates to and from St. Albans, Vermont from New Haven. The trains also permit connections at New Haven with Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor (Washington to Boston) service, as well as Metro North service to New York, and Shore Line East local commuter service to New London. Departures are spread throughout the day, with trains typically operating at intervals of two to three hours. Springfield line services are designed as extensions of Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor service, and are not scheduled to serve local commuter trips (home to work trips). The Amtrak fare structure was substantially reduced in price since this study began. The original fare structure from November 2002 was shown in the existing conditions report, which can be found in Appendix B.
    [Show full text]
  • Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the United States
    Parsons Brinckerhoff 2010 William Barclay Parsons Fellowship Monograph 26 Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the United States Fellow: Francis P. Banko Professional Associate Principal Project Manager Lead Investigator: Jackson H. Xue Rail Vehicle Engineer December 2012 136763_Cover.indd 1 3/22/13 7:38 AM 136763_Cover.indd 1 3/22/13 7:38 AM Parsons Brinckerhoff 2010 William Barclay Parsons Fellowship Monograph 26 Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the United States Fellow: Francis P. Banko Professional Associate Principal Project Manager Lead Investigator: Jackson H. Xue Rail Vehicle Engineer December 2012 First Printing 2013 Copyright © 2013, Parsons Brinckerhoff Group Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means—graphic, electronic, mechanical (including photocopying), recording, taping, or information or retrieval systems—without permission of the pub- lisher. Published by: Parsons Brinckerhoff Group Inc. One Penn Plaza New York, New York 10119 Graphics Database: V212 CONTENTS FOREWORD XV PREFACE XVII PART 1: INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE RESEARCH 3 1.1 Unprecedented Support for High Speed Rail in the U.S. ....................3 1.2 Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the U.S. .....4 1.3 Research Objectives . 6 1.4 William Barclay Parsons Fellowship Participants ...........................6 1.5 Host Manufacturers and Operators......................................7 1.6 A Snapshot in Time .................................................10 CHAPTER 2 HOST MANUFACTURERS AND OPERATORS, THEIR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES 11 2.1 Overview . 11 2.2 Introduction to Host HSR Manufacturers . 11 2.3 Introduction to Host HSR Operators and Regulatory Agencies .
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Corridor Chase, Maryland January 4, 1987
    PB88-916301 NATIONAL TRANSPORT SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 20594 RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT REAR-END COLLISION OF AMTRAK PASSENGER TRAIN 94, THE COLONIAL AND CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION FREIGHT TRAIN ENS-121, ON THE NORTHEAST CORRIDOR CHASE, MARYLAND JANUARY 4, 1987 NTSB/RAR-88/01 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2.Government Accession No. 3.Recipient's Catalog No. NTSB/RAR-88/01 . PB88-916301 Title and Subtitle Railroad Accident Report^ 5-Report Date Rear-end Collision of'*Amtrak Passenger Train 949 the January 25, 1988 Colonial and Consolidated Rail Corporation Freight -Performing Organization Train ENS-121, on the Northeast Corridor, Code Chase, Maryland, January 4, 1987 -Performing Organization 7. "Author(s) ~~ Report No. Performing Organization Name and Address 10.Work Unit No. National Transportation Safety Board Bureau of Accident Investigation .Contract or Grant No. Washington, D.C. 20594 k3-Type of Report and Period Covered 12.Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Iroad Accident Report lanuary 4, 1987 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Washington, D. C. 20594 1*+.Sponsoring Agency Code 15-Supplementary Notes 16 Abstract About 1:16 p.m., eastern standard time, on January 4, 1987, northbound Conrail train ENS -121 departed Bay View yard at Baltimore, Mary1 and, on track 1. The train consisted of three diesel-electric freight locomotive units, all under power and manned by an engineer and a brakeman. Almost simultaneously, northbound Amtrak train 94 departed Pennsylvania Station in Baltimore. Train 94 consisted of two electric locomotive units, nine coaches, and three food service cars. In addition to an engineer, conductor, and three assistant conductors, there were seven Amtrak service employees and about 660 passengers on the train.
    [Show full text]
  • Reservations PUBLISHED Overview 30 March 2015.Xlsx
    Reservation Country Domestic day train 1st Class 2nd Class Comments Information compulsory € 8,50 n.a. on board only; free newspaper WESTbahn trains possible n.a. € 5,00 via www.westbahn.at Austria ÖBB trains possible € 3,00 online / € 3,50 € 3,00 online / € 3,50 free wifi on rj-trains ÖBB Intercitybus Graz-Klagenfurt recommended € 3,00 online / € 3,50 € 3,00 online / € 3,50 first class includes drinks supplement per single journey. Can be bought in the station, in the train or online: Belgium to/from Brussels National Airport no reservation € 5,00 € 5,00 www.belgianrail.be Bosnia- Regional trains compulsory € 1,50 € 1,50 price depends on distance Herzegovina (ZRS) Bulgaria Express trains compulsory € 0,25 € 0,25 IC Zagreb - Osijek/Varazdin compulsory € 1,00 € 1,00 Croatia ICN Zagreb - Split compulsory € 1,00 € 1,00 IC/EC (domestic journeys) recommended € 2,00 € 2,00 Czech Republic SC SuperCity compulsory € 8,00 € 8,00 includes newspaper and catering in 1st class Denmark InterCity / InterCity Lyn recommended € 4,00 € 4,00 InterCity recommended € 1,84 to €5,63 € 1,36 to € 4,17 Finland price depends on distance Pendolino recommended € 3,55 to € 6,79 € 2,63 to € 5,03 France TGV and Intercités compulsory € 9 to € 18 € 9 to € 18 FYR Macedonia IC 540/541 Skopje-Bitola compulsory € 0,50 € 0,50 EC/IC/ICE possible € 4,50 € 4,50 ICE Sprinter compulsory € 11,50 € 11,50 includes newspapers Germany EC 54/55 Berlin-Gdansk-Gdynia compulsory € 4,50 € 4,50 Berlin-Warszawa Express compulsory € 4,50 € 4,50 Great Britain Long distance trains possible Free Free Greece Inter City compulsory € 7,10 to € 20,30 € 7,10 to € 20,30 price depends on distance EC (domestic jouneys) compulsory € 3,00 € 3,00 Hungary IC compulsory € 3,00 € 3,00 when purchased in Hungary, price may depend on pre-sales and currency exchange rate Ireland IC possible n/a € 5,00 reservations can be made online @ www.irishrail.ie Frecciarossa, Frecciargento, → all compulsory and optional reservations for passholders can be purchased via Trenitalia at compulsory € 10,00 € 10,00 Frecciabianca "Global Pass" fare.
    [Show full text]
  • Intercity High-Speed Railway Systems • Economic Growth and Increased Employment
    Low Carbon Green Growth Roadmap for Asia and the Pacific FACT SHEET If designed well, high-speed railway systems contribute towards: • Improved air quality and lower greenhouse gas emissions4 Intercity high-speed railway systems • Economic growth and increased employment Challenges to using high-speed railway High-speed railway explained • Estimating annual ridership during feasibility stage analysis (and thus returns, including greenhouse gas Definitions of a high-speed railway system vary, but a common one is a rail system designed for maximum train reduction) can be difficult, especially when developments in other transportation modes (air and auto speeds that exceed 200 km per hour for upgraded tracks and 250 km per hour for new tracks. High-speed rail is mobile) are uncertain generally used for intercity transport rather than urban transport. • High investment costs for buying the needed land and building the lines and trains • Long period of construction time and for reaping payback Performance, evaluated Limitations Capacity Approximately 1,000 persons per vehicle. Double-decker trains • High-speed rail lines, once built, are very inflexible. Corridors to be developed must be heavily studied to increase the capacity but also increase drag, and thus increase the determine if the return is likely to be eco-efficient. amount of energy needed. • Increasing train speed requires considerably more electricity. If power is sourced from polluting technologies and/or if load factors are low, high-speed rail can actually exacerbate rather than mitigate Geographical range There is no limit in expanding the line, as long as the demand is high. Generally, high-speed rail can compete with airplane trips of greenhouse gas emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Some Airport-Rail Links Get Built and Others Do Not: the Role of Institutions, Equity and Financing
    Why some airport-rail links get built and others do not: the role of institutions, equity and financing by Julia Nickel S.M. in Engineering Systems- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2010 Vordiplom in Wirtschaftsingenieurwesen- Universität Karlsruhe, 2007 Submitted to the Department of Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Political Science at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY February 2011 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2011. All rights reserved. Author . Department of Political Science October 12, 2010 Certified by . Kenneth Oye Associate Professor of Political Science Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . Roger Peterson Arthur and Ruth Sloan Professor of Political Science Chair, Graduate Program Committee 1 Why some airport-rail links get built and others do not: the role of institutions, equity and financing by Julia Nickel Submitted to the Department of Political Science On October 12, 2010, in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Political Science Abstract The thesis seeks to provide an understanding of reasons for different outcomes of airport ground access projects. Five in-depth case studies (Hongkong, Tokyo-Narita, London- Heathrow, Chicago- O’Hare and Paris-Charles de Gaulle) and eight smaller case studies (Kuala Lumpur, Seoul, Shanghai-Pudong, Bangkok, Beijing, Rome- Fiumicino, Istanbul-Atatürk and Munich- Franz Josef Strauss) are conducted. The thesis builds on existing literature that compares airport-rail links by explicitly considering the influence of the institutional environment of an airport on its ground access situation and by paying special attention to recently opened dedicated airport expresses in Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Strong Cross Winds on High-Speed Trains: a Methodol- Ogy for Risk Assessment and Development of Countermeasures
    Effects of Strong Cross Winds on High-Speed Trains: A methodol- ogy for risk assessment and development of countermeasures Gerd Matschke, Peter Deeg, Burkhard Schulte-Werning FTZ, Aerodynamik und Klimatechnik Deutsche Bahn AG, Research & Technology Centre Völckerstrasse 5, 80939 München 1 INTRODUCTION The effect of side winds on rail transport has been investigated since the 1970s by interna- tional research, especially by the railways in Germany, England and Japan. For the DB the subject of side winds only became important with the introduction of the ICE2 with its fast, light driving trailer. Since then DB has been involved in intensive interdisciplinary co- operation to develop a generally valid method for rail transport to guarantee that railways can operate safely with a strong side wind. A basic procedure was described and discussed in 1997 at the World Congress for Railway Research [17]. This paper describes the methodology derived from its continuous further development, as summarised in the Draft Code of Practice Ril 401 of Deutsche Bahn pub- lished in May 2000. The procedure specified in Code of Practice Ril 401 was recognised in May 2000 by the Eisenbahn-Bundesamt (Federal Railway Office - EBA) as a means of proving that railway traffic can run safely when there is a side wind and has since then be- come part of the vehicle acceptance procedure used by the EBA. 2 BASIC PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURE The effect of side wind on rail vehicles is basically determined by the following parameters: The vehicle properties such as shape, weight, position of centre of gravity, running gear properties, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle Report
    EPA: CARE Level I Final Report International District CARE Project Community elder shares her perspectives at the first CARE partner meeting, 2005 Better Housing, Happier Lives, Stronger Communities _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 606 Maynard Avenue South, Suite 105 . Seattle WA 98104 . Tel (206) 623-5132 . Fax: (206) 623-3479 . www.idhousingalliance.org Grantee: International District Housing Alliance Project location: Seattle’s Chinatown-International District, Seattle, WA – King County Project title: International District CARE Project Grant period: October 1, 2005 to September 30, 2007 Project Manager: Joyce Pisnanont EPA Project Officer: Sally Hanft Personal Reflection: Reflecting on the past two years of the ID CARE project, it is evident that our community has had many wonderful successes, as well as a fair share of challenges. Our successes included a tremendous amount of culturally relevant outreach and education and the development of a strong core of community leadership amongst limited English speaking populations. Our greatest challenges were maintaining the momentum of the work in the face of organizational restructuring (in year 2) and growing anti-immigrant sentiments nationwide that inhibited civic participation on the part of our immigrant youth and elders. Perhaps our greatest area for improvement is the partnership development piece. Since 2005, IDHA has successfully garnered many new partnerships, but needs to strengthen our project advisory committee so as to be truly representative of the multiple community stakeholders that are essential for driving the project forward. This became most clear during our recent CARE National Training in Atlanta, GA. In listening to the successes and challenges of other CARE grantees, it became evident where the ID community’s strengths lay, and where we could have done many things differently.
    [Show full text]
  • A Train for the 21St Century
    A train for the 21st century Operating at speeds of 240 km/h, the ‘Acela Express’, the fastest train in North America, will soon revive a link with the epic railroad days on the new continent, using Nomex® brand paper for electrical insulation n the 10th of May, 1869, in Promonto- New York and Boston to just under 3 hours Richardson, Amtrak’s vice-president for mar- video facilities, sockets for portable comput- ican high-speed train is making its appearance in procedures, quicker boarding times and Ory, a tiny settlement in Utah, the Union and between New York and Washington to 2 keting and communications, “convey a brand ers with modem connection and a sit-down on the North-east Corridor network, from immediate luggage availability. Pacific and the Central Pacific Railroad lines hours and 45 minutes. new experience in rail travel.” dining service. The cars, which are designed Boston in the north to Washington in the south, Rail travel is also more comfortable, more were joined to complete the very first Passengers will embark for their 240 km/h to be accessible to persons with limited mobil- since this region is the most densely populated economical, less energy intensive and virtual- transcontinental rail link between the east and journey at the venerable Grand Central Sta- Unparalleled comfort and service ity, will have wide corridors, toilet facilities, in the United States and has the most heavily ly pollution-free. Indeed, the success of the west coasts of the United States. The railroad tion, in the centre of Manhattan, and will Apart from speed, Amtrak, operator of the plenty of room for passengers, pay-phones congested transportation system.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Speed Ground Transportation Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment
    High-Speed Ground Transportation U.S. Department of Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Transportation Federal Railroad Administration Office of Railroad Policy and Development Washington, DC 20590 Final Report DOT/FRA/ORD-12/15 September 2012 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the United States Government, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the United States Government. The United States Government assumes no liability for the content or use of the material contained in this document. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tampa to Orlando High-Speed Rail Project: Florida Taxpayer Risk Assessment by Wendell Cox Project Director: Robert W
    Reason Foundation Policy Brief 95 January 2011 The Tampa to Orlando High-Speed Rail Project: Florida Taxpayer Risk Assessment by Wendell Cox Project Director: Robert W. Poole, Jr. Reason Foundation Reason Foundation’s mission is to advance a free society by developing, applying and promoting libertarian principles, including individual liberty, free markets and the rule of law. We use journalism and public policy research to influence the frameworks and actions of policymakers, journalists and opinion leaders. Reason Foundation’s nonpartisan public policy research promotes choice, competition and a dynamic market economy as the foundation for human dignity and progress. Reason produces rigorous, peer-reviewed research and directly engages the policy process, seeking strategies that emphasize cooperation, flexibility, local knowledge and results. Through practical and innovative approaches to complex problems, Reason seeks to change the way people think about issues, and promote policies that allow and encourage individu- als and voluntary institutions to flourish. Reason Foundation is a tax-exempt research and education organization as defined under IRS code 501(c) (3). Reason Foundation is supported by voluntary contributions from individuals, foundations and corpora- tions. The views are those of the author, not necessarily those of Reason Foundation or its trustees. While the authors of this study and Reason Foundation may hold some differing views about the proper role of govern- ment in society, Reason Foundation believes this study offers valuable policy analysis and recommendations. Copyright © 2011 Reason Foundation. All rights reserved. Reason Foundation Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 The Tampa To Orlando High-Speed Rail Project ......................................................... 2 The Risk To Florida Taxpayers ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download Brochure
    LynnwoodTourism.com Lynnwood, WA 98046 Seattle N�� SHOP HERE P.O. Box 5008 Lynnwood is a shopper’s delight! From unique one of a kind shops to the region’s Y destination shopping center, Lynnwood has it all. 0 Seattle N�� 6 Lynnwood is home to Alderwood, a 1.3 LYNNWOOD RECREATION CENTER million square foot shopping center with a unique mix of retail, entertainment, and dining options. Alderwood is the go-to retail destination for GET HERE locals and visitors alike. Cars/Buses EVERETT Down the street from Alderwood, savvy shoppers will Lynnwood is easily accessible nd Nordstrom Rack, Designer Shoe Warehouse, from Interstates 5 and 405. 5 BOEING/ Old Navy, and Best Buy. Over a dozen furniture The Lynnwood Transit Center is PAINE FIELD stores are clustered in the shopping district served by Community Transit SNOHOMISH COUNTY too. Antiquing is minutes away in and Sound Transit providing LYNNWOOD Edmonds and Snohomish, and summer local and regional bus service. PUGET SOUND 5 WOODINVILLE brings a variety of local farmer’s markets throughout the region. Planes Lynnwood is 8 miles south of Paine Field BELLEVUE Lynnwood oers shoppers Airport and 30 miles north of SEATTLE a great deal more! SeaTac International Airport. Trains Amtrak’s Cascades and Empire Builder STAY interstate routes and the Sounder commuter train to Seattle are available from the Edmonds station, 5 miles west of Lynnwood. MEET HERE PLAY Ferries Washington State Ferry terminals provide service from Edmonds to Kingston (5 miles Looking for the perfect location for your gathering? Look west) and Mukilteo to Whidbey Island (9 miles north).
    [Show full text]