DOCSLIB.ORG

Calabazas Creek Open Space Preserve Project Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Calabazas Creek Open Space Preserve Project Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2016 SONOMA COUNTY AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION & OPEN SPACE DISTRICT CALABAZAS CREEK OPEN SPACE PRESERVE PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION JUNE 2016 747 Mendocino Avenue, Suite 100, Santa Rosa, CA 95401 CALABAZAS CREEK OPEN SPACE PRESERVE PROJECT Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration The following Initial Study has b een prepared in compliance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Prepared By: Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District 747 Mendocino Avenue, Suite 100 Santa Rosa, CA 95401 June 2016 Contact: Kim Batchelder (707) 565‐7360 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Initial Study ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Public and Agency Review ......................................................................................................................... 1 Organization of the Initial Study ................................................................................................................ 2 1. PROJECT INFORMATION ......................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Project Need, Objectives, and Scope ............................................................................................ 4 2.3 Project Location .............................................................................................................................. 4 2.4 Project Site Characteristics ............................................................................................................ 6 2.5 Project Components ..................................................................................................................... 10 2.6 Plan Implementation ................................................................................................................... 28 3. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS .................................................................................... 32 4. DETERMINATION .................................................................................................................................... 33 5. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS .............................................................................. 34 5.1 Aesthetics ...................................................................................................................................... 36 5.2 Agricultural and Forestry Resources ......................................................................................... 39 5.3 Air Quality .................................................................................................................................... 42 5.4 Biological Resources .................................................................................................................... 50 5.5 Cultural Resources ....................................................................................................................... 67 5.6 Geology and Soils ......................................................................................................................... 73 5.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ......................................................................................................... 76 5.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ............................................................................................ 80 5.9 Hydrology and Water Quality ................................................................................................... 84 5.10 Land Use and Planning ............................................................................................................... 88 5.11 Mineral Resources ........................................................................................................................ 90 5.12 Noise .............................................................................................................................................. 91 5.13 Population and Housing ............................................................................................................. 94 5.14 Public Services .............................................................................................................................. 96 5.15 Recreation ...................................................................................................................................... 98 5.16 Transportation and Traffic ........................................................................................................ 100 5.17 Utilities and Service Systems .................................................................................................... 102 5.18 Mandatory Findings of Significance ........................................................................................ 105 6. REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................... 107 7. REPORT PREPARERS ............................................................................................................................. 108 Appendices A. Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration B. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Calculations C. Erosion Control Sites Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation & Open Space District i Calabazas Creek Open Space Preserve Initial Study/MND June 2016 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1 Regional Location ......................................................................................................................................... 5 2 Project Location ............................................................................................................................................ 7 3 Erosion Control Locations ......................................................................................................................... 13 4 Ecological Management Issues ................................................................................................................. 21 5 Special Status Plant Species....................................................................................................................... 52 6 Special Status Wildlife Species ................................................................................................................. 53 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 Habitats on the Preserve .............................................................................................................................. 8 2 Proposed Erosion Control Activities ....................................................................................................... 11 3 Recommended Management Activities .................................................................................................. 29 4 Estimated Construction Emissions (lbs per day) ................................................................................... 44 5 Special‐Status Plant Species with Potential to Occur in Project Vicinity ............................................ 54 6 Special‐Status Wildlife Species with Potential to Occur in Project Vicinity ....................................... 57 Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation & Open Space District ii Calabazas Creek Open Space Preserve Initial Study/MND June 2016 INTRODUCTION Initial Study In 2004, the Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District (District) purchased 1,285 acres of a 1,600‐acre property from Beltane Incorporated. Soon after the purchase, the District renamed the property Calabazas Creek Open Space Preserve (Preserve). The Preserve is located in southeastern Sonoma County along the western slope of the Mayacamas Mountains and the northeastern portion of Sonoma Valley, approximately 7 miles north of the town of Sonoma and 10 miles southeast of the city of Santa Rosa. To manage, enhance and protect the resources within the Preserve, the District has prepared the Calabazas Creek Open Space Preserve Resource Management Plan (Management Plan). The proposed project, for purposes of this environmental document, is the adoption and implementation of the Management Plan. Pursuant to Section 15063 of the State California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Sections 15000 et seq.), an Initial Study is a preliminary environmental analysis that is used by the lead agency as a basis for determining whether an Environmental Impact Report, a Mitigated Negative Declaration, or a Negative Declaration is required for a project. The State CEQA Guidelines require that an Initial Study contain a project description, description of environmental setting, identification of environmental effects by checklist or other similar form, explanation of environmental effects, discussion of mitigation for significant environmental effects, evaluation of the project’s consistency with existing, applicable land use controls, and the name of persons who
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Direct Protection Areas
    Thorn Junction Benbow Knob, The 6486 ' EEL Panther Peak R, S FK Windy Mountain Shasta-Trinity 1862 ' 7081 ' Thorn E Vinegar Peak Schofield Peak Six Rivers E L 6549 ' 1992 ' R FK , Little Butte , M M N R Booth Knoll EEL A F B K 5632 ' E T 2427 ' A T Shelter Cove R O C L HUMBOLDT R E Walker Butte K Hopkins Peak , E S R K F 2404 ' A 6749 ' K Reed Mountain W Round Mountain E Sugarloaf Mountain Chamisal Mountain Whitethorn Beall Place 3101 ' R A E L Pilot Peak K 5000 ' L 7367 ' Harvey Peak E A Big Butte R 2598 ' E C Brush Mountain , 4092 ' R 5922 ' M 7361 ' 4200 ' F Island Mountain K D CR Linn, Mount Linn Mount Lake Mountain , N EA IL Moose Peak F F G 8092 ' 2467 ' 3851 ' K O TRINITY 1787 ' LM Oven Lid BA South Yolla Bolly South Yolla Bolly Mountains 6662 ' E Island Mountain L Solomon Peak 2460 ' D 3286 ' 8092 ' E Cooks Valley 7581 ' R C Horse Ranch Peak R, N Twin Peaks FK K 4156 ' F Nielson Place S 7403 ' , R EEL R, L N FK E E Hammerhorn Mountain 7563 ' Noble Butte Andersonia 2435 ' EE L R, Little Butte S FK, E Wildhorse Peak BR 1800 ' R 3564 ' C Piercy Table Rock IS H R F AN C Ramsey 3360 ' DI Island Mountain Delmonico Place IN 3847 ' Bald Mountain Bell Springs Mountain 3938 ' 3861 ' Mina EE L R, M FK Bell Springs R Ball Rock C S Griffin Place 6663 ' Camel Rock E Castle Peak M 3837 ' O 6216 ' Steuben Place High Tip E H E T L R 372 ' , S Mitchell Place F R K L Cold Springs Workcenter Kenny E E Red Rock 6050 ' TEHAMA Red Mountain Little Baldy Beaver Glade Fire Station 4095 ' 3646 ' Pratt Place Buck Mountain Leech Lake Mountain Ball Mountain
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Historic Resources
    6 historic resources 6.5 Policies and Implementing Actions The Sciaroni Winery and Distillery dates from the 1880s. A range of policies and implementing actions are outlined below and organized into the following topic areas: 1. Protected Historic Resources; and 2. Historic Resources Awareness The policies mandate, encourage or allow certain actions to be pursued throughout the duration of the General Plan. Together, they serve as strategic directions for City staff and partners, highlighting where time and resources should be focused. ST. HELENA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 2035, APRIL 2016 | 6-13 6 historic resources topic area 1 PROTECTED HISTORIC RESOURCES Policies HR1.1 Preserve the City’s historic and cultural resources, so that they may contrib- ute to the special character and quality of the City and support its economic base. HR1.2 Protect the historic resources that exist in the downtown commercial area. HR1.3 Encourage the adaptive reuse, rehabilitation and retrofit of historic buildings in which the original use is no longer feasible. HR1.4 Promote the application of sustainable building practices to the preser- vation of historic resources. HR1.5 If historic resources are suspected by the City of being present on a pro- sposed development site the City shall conduct a records search at the Northwest Information Center (NWIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System to determine if a project has the potential to affect an archaeologi- cal site and if additional project-specific study for cultural resources is recommended. The City may require additional cultural resources study if rec- ommended by the NWIC, with the study address- ing project-specific impacts on archaeological and paleontological resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Putah Creek Corridor Connecting the Pieces
    Putah Creek Corridor Connecting the Pieces Putah Creek Corridor Connecting the Pieces Accepted and Approved by A Senior Project Presented to the Faculty of the Landscape Architecture Program University of California, Davis Steve Greco, Faculty Committee Member in Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Bachelors of Science in Landscape Architecture Tara Hanlon, Committee Member Rich Marovich, Committee Member Presented by: Claire Napawan, Senior Project Faculty Advisor Kathryn Salfen at University of California, Davis on the Tenth Day of June, 2011 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my senior project committee members for their tremendous help. They all provided me with their knowledge, time and encouragement. THANK YOU! Claire Napawan Steve Greco Rich Marovich Tara Hanlon In addition to my senior project committee members, I would like to thank my parents for all their help not only during this project but for helping through everything! i Abstract This project focuses on Putah Creek as it runs from Lake Berryessa to the Yolo Wildlife Area. It examines the corridor as both a wildlife corridor and as a local trail corridor. With many existing patches of wildlife reserves located along Putah creek, the restoration of riparian forest along the channel will provide full connectivity and functionality to the corridor. On the social scale Putah Creek runs between Winters and Davis. Connecting the existing trails of the UC Davis Riparian Reserve and Winters Putah Creek Nature Park will establish a local trail corridor. This project also examines the need of the design of the trails at Win- ter’s Putah Creek Nature Park to Preserve linear corridors and creating multi-use trails that can allow wildlife movement across the landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • The Clearlake, California Hot Dry Rock Geothermal Project
    LA-12718-HDR Hot D y Rock uc-000 Issued: March 1996 Surface Water Supply for the Clearlake, California Hot Dry Rock Geothermal Project Alan R. lager* *Consultant at Los Alamos P.O. Box 4754 Santa Fe, New Mexico 87502 (505) 984-0904 Los Alamos Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 Table of Contents List of Figures ....................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables ........................................................................................................................ vii Abstract ................................................................................................................................. 1 I . Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 2 A . Background ..................................................................................................................... 2 B . Task ................................................................................................................................. 4 II . Population, Land. and Water Use in the Clear Lake Area .............................................. 5 A . General Description ........................................................................................................ 5 B . Population Size and Projected Growth ........................................................................... 6 C . Geothermal Effects on Water Supply ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cobb: Mountain Bike
    Lake County Bike Route 8: Cobb: Mountain Bike e k S L L Mount I Anderson H @ D Olive E Red Hills Marsh 8.1 R 2,485' Viticultural = ST29 1 ‰ Area B O T T LE R O DIENER C D S R K E IG R L ER D 9.2 SP 5.2 S D RI 4.0 w IA NG ee M S P 2 tw O N a O E te N R r D TH R C ‰ WILDCAT RD I D R N re U D e S I k T 1.5 n Creek R T Canyo D 8.3 R ler E eig Boggs IEN R S Lake D D R Reserve C o GRAY RD l S Boggs e 11.4 A 5.0 CANDY L n C L Mount M Lake r H e I AR e N JO 3 RIN k A RD SEP Kel GT R N H sey O Hannah O TR C N D Y F N N r L A e A C e B T 3,978' k O R R T D ‰ E T L L E IG R E B O ‰ S S C K Mariah Meadows n R D k e e r P ‰ 13.4 Seigler 175 C ST E 1.7m R y e RO I CKY Mountain N s 4 S p RD ÷ ÷ I ..gI o R 3,692' 3.0 D Snows C Loch D Lake D R Begin & End N Lomond O A .p GU M 1.8 A D 29 O ST Sulphu UL r C L reek CE ‰ H D EK RD R SULPHUR CRE 12.6 C .a O L lsey Creek Ke ‰ 5 k 5.0 13.7 e re legend C s Big Canyon g n B Cre i O ek r a camping TT HOBERG D p LE S R n t D R e R O B e C I I food Y golf course G w E K L S AL C V R A H N G D H lodging HI R Y O N 6 p parking R FORESTRY RD D c picnic facilities n ‰ K The Geysers e ls public land e Begin & End ...gca y C .p r ‰ Boggs Mtn D e ...-w6 g restrooms T R e LA k Mayacamas F L L view I Mountains M 7 Boggs Mountain B W ig N water trail A C S a Demonstration ny on ...gIH 1.6 C r State Forest ee Cobb k ■ Min 2305 | Max 3032 | Elev gain 1848’ 15.5 mi 7.4 ■ Min 2275 | Max 2849 | Elev gain 1538’ 14.5 mi 8 3200 Elevation (ft) 8A 3000 TS175 2800 H 8B A 9 R B 2600 I N S P R IN 2400 G S R D Distance (mi) 2200 0 510 15 n Harbin Hot Springs 10 Miles ..aH 012 Sources: USGS, ESRI, TANA, AND AB C DE FG HI J Cobb: Mountain Bike | Ride: moderate | Allow 2–3 hours Alternate Out-and-Back Routes Diener Rd | 8 miles out-and-back | ~900ft uphill Route 8A Bottle Rock-Harrington Route 8B Loch Lomond-Seigler elevation gain Flat loop | 15 miles Springs loop | 14 miles From Salmina Rd, Diener Rd winds downhill (about 3 miles of dirt road) crossing Seigler Springs Rd at 1.5m.
    [Show full text]
  • Kelsey Creek Watershed Assessment
    Kelsey Creek Watershed Assessment A Document of the Big Valley Watershed Council Prepared for: West Lake and East Lake Resource Conservation Districts 889 Lakeport Blvd Lakeport, CA 95453 (707) 263-4180 Funded by Proposition 50 through the CALFED Watershed Program Administered by the California Department of Water Resources Prepared by: County of Lake Department of Public Works Water Resources Division 255 North Forbes Street Lakeport, CA 95453 Tel. 707-263-2341 and West Lake and East Lake Resource Conservation Districts 889 Lakeport Blvd. Lakeport, California 95453 Tel. 707-263-4180 February 2010 Acknowledgements Author Erica Lundquist, Lake County Division of Water Resources Plates by Greg Dills, West Lake and East Lake Resource Conservation Districts Glossary by Alisa Carlson, Scotts Creek Watershed Council Project Partners Lake County Division of Water Resources Natural Resources Conservation Service Bureau of Land Management Upper Lake Habematolel Pomo Indians Robinson Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians Big Valley Watershed Council Middle Creek Coordinated Resource Management and Planning Group Scotts Creek Watershed Council Technical Advisors and Reviewers Voris Brumfield, Lake County Code Enforcement Division Caroline Chavez, Lake County Public Services Department Kim Clymire, Lake County Public Services Department Richard Coel, Lake County Community Development Department Diane Coulon, California Department of Fish and Game Greg Dills, West Lake and East Lake Resource Conservation Districts Rachel Elkins, University of California Cooperative
    [Show full text]
  • Scotts Valley Mendocino D 15.8 R N I National a T N Forest U
    Lake County Bike Route 4: Scotts Valley Mendocino D 15.8 R N I National A T N Forest U B O 1 A C M Bachelor HE K LO L B R E L V U Valley D A E R LL L E A S T Y K Bl WITTE E A E R R S ue S D R P D R Mendocino .....gINkH I N G National Forest ‰ Clover S R ST20 Ranger Station Lak Blue Lakes D Valley 2 es .y k e ...gIH 13.5 e r C e ‰ T l d S Upper Cow d i L N A I U 18.3 M Mountain R Scotts Creek A C E M Lake lo L v D e 3,924' E r L 12.1 n C L r Tule Lake e R e D Upper Lake k County Park Hogback Ridge 3 20.2 ..gc BR ID n White G E Battle of Bloody Cow A Rock R Island Historical B O Landmark #427 Mountain .a Mountain R R 4 Recreation D Z E Area N O W R E ‰ D S ‰ T k L e legend A e r K Rodman 8.2 C E F s F t R k boatt ramp or launch O ....gIcH o D Slough c T S 22.9 U camping n C 20 a Glen Eden Trail @ E ST 5 N Nice R E I food .....gcw6- C -LU 5.8 NICE S C .H hospital O T TS n VA H lodging LL Rodman Slough EY R County Park D D marsh F R 29 OF ST (non-navigable) KH ....gcNk Scotts C IC 6 ree E p parking k c picnic facilities .H public land Bureau of Land 25.9 g restrooms Management ‰ view 7 .i visitor info @ N water trail Eachus Rocky Point H Scotts Valley E Lake N SCOTTS VALL SCOTTS T D S D R A PA RK V I E L C WY Scott D B K R E S R R L ’ R O s Cre Berger L I H D Clear Lake S H 8 E Lake K EY ek A L 1,326' RD Berger SIE DR DES D Bay = R L L I H ‰ ‰ 9 ST29 T S Rumsey Bay H G .....gIckH I 1 H 1TH ST 0.5 S RD Lakeport 1,343' GG 30.9 RI Begin & End T S .p Library Park 10 Miles N I .i A M Sources: USGS, ESRI, TANA, AND 012 N AB C DE FG HI J Scotts Valley | Ride: moderate | Allow 3 – 4 hours Route 4 | 32 miles OPTION: For an additional 16-mile out-and-back that will bring OPTION: Continue on Hwy 20 for another mile until you see the signs you to the Middle Creek Campground in the Mendocino National for the Lodge at Blue Lakes on the left where the “Upper Blue Lake” Forest, turn RIGHT on Main St and follow it to the end where it segment begins.
    [Show full text]
  • LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF's OFFICE Page 1 MEDIA BULLETIN 11/01/2020 - 11/16/2020 11/17/2020
    LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE Page 1 MEDIA BULLETIN 11/01/2020 - 11/16/2020 11/17/2020 00:00 WIRELESS 911 HANG UP 2011010001 Occurred at La Monarca Market on Main. , in Lower Lake. 22 METERS ACCIDENTAL CALL, NO ASSISTANCE NEEDED, DURING OPEN LINE DISPATCH HEARD UNK MALE SAY IF SOMEONE SAID SOMETHING THEY'D GET SHOT. Disposition: GENERAL SERVICES RENDERED. 00:11 WIRELESS 911 HANG UP 2011010002 Occurred at Highland Springs Park on Highland Springs Rd. , in Lakeport. TXF CDF. Disposition: REFERRED TO ANOTHER AGENCY. 00:14 ALARM 2011010004 Occurred on E State Hwy 20, in Clearlake Oaks. LIVING ROOM MOTION RESP JASON ROBERT 650-703-0590 NOT RESPONDING. Disposition: FALSE ALARM. 00:16 OUTSIDE AGENCY ASSIST 2011010005 Occurred at Highland Springs Park on Highland Springs Rd. , in Lakeport. 50-60 PEOPLE HAVING PARTY W/ LARGE BONFIRE. Disposition: REFERRED TO ANOTHER AGENCY. 00:17 MUSIC DISTURBANCE 2011010006 Occurred on Panoramic Dr, in Lucerne. LOUD PARTY. Disposition: GENERAL SERVICES RENDERED. 00:24 FRAUD 2011010007 Occurred at Running Creek Casino on E State Hwy 20. , in Upper Lake. TWO COUNTERFEIT $20 BILLS IN SECURITY DISPATCH. Disposition: REPORT TAKEN. 00:30 TRAFFIC STOP 2011010008 Officer initiated activity at S State Highway 29/RENFRO, Kelseyville. Disposition: WARNING. 00:31 WIRELESS 911 HANG UP 2011010009 Occurred at Rodman Slough on Nice Lucerne Cutoff. , in Lakeport. TXF CHP. Disposition: REFERRED TO ANOTHER AGENCY. 00:48 CITIZEN ASSIST 2011010011 Officer initiated activity at Highland Springs Park, Highland Springs Rd, Lakeport. W/ 2 JUVES. Disposition: CITIZENS ASSIST. 01:52 WIRELESS 911 HANG UP 2011010013 Occurred at State Hwy 53/HWY 29, in Lower Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Cobb Mountain Area Plan
    COBB MOUNTAIN AREA PLAN Preliminary Draft May 1989 Lake County Board of Supervisors L.D. “Bud” Franklin, Chair Voris Brumfield Karan Mackey Gary Lambert Walt Wilcox Prepared by the Lake County Planning Department Alex Hinds Planning Director Mark Radabaugh Associate Planner Kim Seidler Associate Planner Tod Herman Assistant Planner Jerry Bowden Planning Technician Barbara Jo Wise Planning Office Supervisor Cindy Phillips Secretary I With the assistance of the Cobb Mountain Planning Advisory Committee Helen Perkins Whitney, Chair Steve L. Brodnansky, Vice Chair Bill H. Angelley Howard D. Hickman Rick Moore Don Emerson Gilbert Horst Jack Russell Kathie Fossa Jeanette Knight Steve Sayers Barbara Galvan Tory Matzinger Robert J. Stark Roberta Grahn Keller McDonald COBB MOUNTAIN AREA PLAN Preliminary Draft March 1989 Table of Contents PART ONE PAGE INTRODUCTION 1.0 General Background 1.1 1.1 Purpose of the Area Plan 1.1 1.2 Community Participation 1.1 1.3 Plan Organization 1.3 2.0 Issues, Assumptions and Projections 2.0 2.1 Major Planning Issues 2.1 2.2 Assumptions 2.3 2.3 Population and Growth Projections 2.4 PART TWO INVENTORY AND POLICY ANALYSIS 3.0 Natural Resources 3.1 3.1 Geography and Climate 3.1 3.2 Soils and Slope 3.1 3.3 Water Resources 3.2 3.4 Vegetation and Wildlife 3.4 3.5 Agriculture and Forestry 3.10 3.6 Minerals 3.12 3.7 Critical Resource Areas 3.12 3.8 Scenic Resources 3.18 3.9 Cultural Resources 3.19 3.10 Natural Resource Policies 3.22 4.0 Public Safety 4.1 4.1 Fire Hazards 4.1 4.2 Flood Hazards 4.2 4.3 Geologic and Seismic
    [Show full text]
  • Clear Lake Annotated Bibliography October 2, 2009
    Clear Lake Annotated Bibliography October 2, 2009 By Kristina L. Weber, Lisa C. Thompson, and Gregory A. Giusti University of California Cooperative Extension Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology Department UC Davis, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 Contact: [email protected] This bibliography contains 282 references, including journal articles, books, reports, newspaper articles, and videos. The main focus was on fish, particularly Clear Lake hitch, but there are also references on culture, settlement, mining, and lake water chemistry. Items are listed in alphabetical order by author, beginning with anonymous works (no author listed). A version of this bibliography is available in EndNote, at no cost. Please contact Lisa Thompson at [email protected] to obtain a copy. Reference Type: Newspaper Article Record Number: 211 Year: 1850 Title: From California-Clear Lake Indian Massacre Newspaper: New-Hampshire Patriot City: Concord, New Hampshire Issue Date: July 11, 1850 Short Title: From California-Clear Lake Indian Massacre Notes: html ONLINE; settlement URL: http://docs.newsbank.com/s/HistArchive/ahnpdoc/EANX/10C296745F173A80/0D0CB57AEDE 52A75 Reference Type: Newspaper Article Record Number: 255 Year: 1857-1876 Title: Scrapbooks on San Francisco water, 1857-1876 Frequency: 2 Issue Date: 1857-1876 Type of Article: Book; Archival Material Date of Entry: 20040427 Short Title: Scrapbooks on San Francisco water, 1857-1876 Accession Number: OCLC: 122382996 Provider: OCLC Call Number: call # - MS OV 5085 CHS 1 Keywords: Water-supply -- California -- San Francisco. Abstract: Newspaper clippings (and a few documents), chiefly on San Francisco's water supply: rainfall, reservoirs, water companies, water in mining, hydrants. Water companies mentioned include: San Francisco Water Works Co.; Bensley Water Co., Spring Valley Water Co., San Mateo Water Co., Mountain Home Water Co., Pacific Water Co.
    [Show full text]
  • LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF's OFFICE Page 1 MEDIA BULLETIN 10/17/2020 - 10/31/2020 11/02/2020
    LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE Page 1 MEDIA BULLETIN 10/17/2020 - 10/31/2020 11/02/2020 00:20 TRAFFIC STOP 2010170001 Officer initiated activity at Highway 175/HARRINGTON Flat Rd, Cobb. Disposition: WARNING. 00:29 TRAFFIC STOP 2010170002 Officer initiated activity at Lakeview Dr, Nice. Disposition: ARREST MADE. 00:43 TRAFFIC STOP 2010170003 Officer initiated activity at Seigler Canyon Rd/Perini Rd, Lower Lake. Disposition: WARNING. 01:05 WIRELESS 911 HANG UP 2010170004 Occurred on Spruce Grove Rd, in Hidden Valley Lake. TX TO CHP. Disposition: REFERRED TO ANOTHER AGENCY. 01:48 WIRELESS 911 HANG UP 2010170006 Occurred on Prather Mountain Rd, in Loch Lomond. TX TO CDF. Disposition: REFERRED TO ANOTHER AGENCY. 01:54 OUTSIDE AGENCY ASSIST 2010170008 Officer initiated activity at Dam Road Ext/Dam Rd, Clearlake. VEG FIRE. Disposition: REFERRED TO ANOTHER AGENCY. 03:11 SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES 2010170011 Occurred on 2D, in Kelseyville. RPS DOG ARE BARKING AND RP HEARD FOOTSTEPS ON THE ROOF..RP STATES IT SOUNDS LIKE HUMAN FOOTSTEPS NOT AN ANIMAL. Disposition: GENERAL SERVICES RENDERED. 03:36 WIRELESS 911 HANG UP 2010170012 Occurred on Pine Av, in Kelseyville. TX TO CAL FIRE. Disposition: REFERRED TO ANOTHER AGENCY. 03:54 FOLLOW UP 2010170013 Officer initiated activity at Hill Road Correctional Facility, Helbush Dr, Lakeport. Disposition: GENERAL SERVICES RENDERED. 05:32 WIRELESS 911 HANG UP 2010170014 Occurred on Prather Mountain Rd, in Loch Lomond. OPEN LINE WITH NOTHING HEARD..UNABLE TO CALL BACK. Disposition: WIRELESS HANGUP . 05:38 WIRELESS 911 HANG UP 2010170015 Occurred on Point Lakeview Rd, in Kelseyville. TX TO CAL FIRE.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Meeting Notes the Following Notes Were Taken by County of Lake and Lake County Fire Safe Council Staff at the Community Meetings Held in October 2008
    Appendix A: Community Meeting Notes The following notes were taken by County of Lake and Lake County Fire Safe Council staff at the community meetings held in October 2008. A.1. Lake Pillsbury, Upper Lake, and Blue Lakes Odd Fellow’s Hall, October 20, 2008 Community Attendees • Alex & Chauncy Irvine • Don Davison • Laura Davison • Alex Straessle • Doris Harville • Loretta McCarthy M. • Betsy Cawn • Erica Lundquist Quere • Carol Binkley • Glenn Roe • Mike Josephson • Cecil Prack • Grant Murray Jr. • Mo Fitch • Chuck Morse • Greg Dills • Pat Brown • Debbie Ickes • Harry Zabel • Pat Ickes • Denise Rushing • Joe Koschik • Rich Burns • Dianna Wellington • Korinn Woodard PRC 4290: no money to enforce. FSC and educating public: how effectively are we using the tool? Look at absentee owners. Want to educate public and get action; need county crew to clear property and add to taxes. Pat Brown, Battalion Chief, Northshore Fire Protection District—Local Fire Protection Update Northshore is very active; weed abatement expanded into Lucerne, Spring Valley, Nice. Triage (evaluate) house before a fire to see if they can safely protect it. Upper Lake usually staffed by volunteers; Nice and Lucerne always have medic and staff. Main stations on 24/7. Top priority now is customer service. Federal grant to replace water tender at Upper Lake. Trying to get more personnel—growing pains, but trying. Will come about and give advice if someone’s available. Districts working together more and more. Supervisor Rushing & Pat Brown: 2009 new ordinance in fire district. Following Santa Clara County and bringing it up here. If problem with neighbor, talk to neighbor first.
    [Show full text]