Designation of Critical Habitat for Graham's Beardtongue

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Designation of Critical Habitat for Graham's Beardtongue Vol. 78 Tuesday, No. 151 August 6, 2013 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for Graham’s Beardtongue (Penstemon grahamii) and White River Beardtongue (Penstemon scariosus var. albifluvis); Proposed Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:56 Aug 05, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\06AUP2.SGM 06AUP2 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2 47832 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 6, 2013 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Processing, Attn: FWS–R6–ES–2013– maximum extent prudent and 0082; Division of Policy and Directives determinable, have habitat designated Fish and Wildlife Service Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife that is considered to be critical habitat. Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, MS Section 4(b)(2) of the Act states that 50 CFR Part 17 2042–PDM; Arlington, VA 22203. the Secretary shall designate and make revisions to critical habitat on the basis [Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2013–0082; We request that you send comments 4500030113] only by the methods described above. of the best available scientific data after We will post all comments on http:// taking into consideration the economic RIN 1018–AZ61 www.regulations.gov. This generally impact, national security impact, and means that we will post any personal any other relevant impact of specifying Endangered and Threatened Wildlife information you provide us (see the any particular area as critical habitat. and Plants; Designation of Critical Information Requested section below for The Secretary may exclude an area from Habitat for Graham’s Beardtongue (≤ more information). critical habitat if she determines that the Penstemon grahamii) and White River The coordinates or plot points or both benefits of such exclusion outweigh the Beardtongue (Penstemon scariosus from which the maps are generated are benefits of specifying such area as part var. albifluvis) included in the administrative record of the critical habitat, unless she AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, for this critical habitat designation and determines, based on the best scientific Interior. are available at http://www.fws.gov/utah data available, that the failure to designate such area as critical habitat ACTION: Proposed rule. fieldoffice under Latest News, http:// www.regulations.gov at Docket No. will result in the extinction of the SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and FWS–R6–ES–2013–0082, and at the species. Wildlife Service, propose to designate Utah Ecological Services Field Office We are preparing an economic critical habitat for Graham’s (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). analysis of the proposed designations of beardtongue (Penstemon grahamii) and Any additional tools or supporting critical habitat. In order to consider White River beardtongue (Penstemon information that we may develop for economic impacts, we are preparing an scariosus var. albifluvis) under the this critical habitat designation will also analysis of the economic impacts of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as be available at the Fish and Wildlife proposed critical habitat designations amended (Act). We are proposing Service Web site and Field Office set out and related factors. We will announce approximately 27,502 hectares (67,959 above, and may also be included in the the availability of the draft economic acres) for designation as critical habitat preamble and/or at http:// analysis as soon as it is completed, at for Graham’s beardtongue in Duchesne www.regulations.gov. which time we will seek additional public review and comment. and Uintah Counties in Utah and Rio FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Blanco County in Colorado. We are We will seek peer review. We are Larry Crist, Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish seeking comments from independent proposing approximately 6,036 hectares and Wildlife Service, Utah Ecological (14,914 acres) for designation as critical specialists to ensure that our critical Services Field Office, 2369 West Orton habitat proposal is based on habitat for White River beardtongue in Circle, Suite 50, West Valley City, UT Duchesne and Uintah Counties in Utah scientifically sound data and analyses. 84119; by telephone at 801–975–3330; We have invited these peer reviewers to and Rio Blanco County in Colorado. If or by facsimile at 801–975–3331. If you we finalize this rule as proposed, it will comment on our specific assumptions use a telecommunications device for the and conclusions in this critical habitat extend the Act’s protections to these deaf (TDD), call the Federal Information species’ critical habitats. proposal. Because we will consider all Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. comments and information we receive DATES: We will accept comments SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: during the comment period, our final received or postmarked on or before rule may differ from this proposal. October 7, 2013. Comments submitted Executive Summary electronically using the Federal Why we need to publish a rule. This Information Requested eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES is a proposed rule to designate critical We intend that any final action section, below) must be received by habitat for two plant taxa, Graham’s resulting from this proposed rule will be 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the closing beardtongue (Penstemon grahamii) and based on the best scientific data date. We must receive requests for White River beardtongue (P. scariosus available and be as accurate and as public hearings, in writing, at the var. albifluvis), which are proposed as effective as possible. Therefore, we address shown in FOR FURTHER threatened species under the request comments or information from INFORMATION CONTACT by September 20, Endangered Species Act (Act). A other concerned government agencies, 2013. proposed rule to list Graham’s the scientific community, industry, or ADDRESSES: You may submit comments beardtongue and White River any other interested party concerning by one of the following methods: beardtongue as threatened species is this proposed rule. We particularly seek (1) Electronically: Go to the Federal published elsewhere in today’s Federal comments regarding: eRulemaking Portal: http:// Register. Under the Act, any species (1) The reasons why we should or www.regulations.gov. Search for Docket that is determined to be an endangered should not designate habitat as ‘‘critical No. FWS–R6–ES–2013–0082, which is or threatened species requires critical habitat’’ under section 4 of the Act (16 the docket number for this rulemaking. habitat to be designated, to the U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) including whether Then, in the Search panel on the left maximum extent prudent and there are threats to the species from side of the screen, under the Document determinable. Designations and human activity, the degree of which can Type heading, click on the Proposed revisions of critical habitat can only be be expected to increase due to the Rules link to locate this document. You completed by issuing a rule. designation, and whether that increase may submit a comment by clicking on The basis for our action. Under the in threat outweighs the benefit of ‘‘Comment Now!’’ Endangered Species Act, any species designation such that the designation of (2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail that is determined to be an endangered critical habitat may not be prudent. or hand-delivery to: Public Comments or threatened species shall, to the (2) Specific information on: VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:56 Aug 05, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06AUP2.SGM 06AUP2 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 6, 2013 / Proposed Rules 47833 (a) The amount and distribution of benefits of the proposed critical habitat found those physical or biological Graham’s beardtongue and White River designation. features: beardtongue occupied and suitable Please include sufficient information (a) Essential to the conservation of the habitat; with your submission (such as scientific species, and (b) Areas that were occupied at the journal articles or other publications) to (b) Which may require special time of listing (or are currently allow us to verify any scientific or management considerations or occupied) and that contain features commercial information you include. protection; and essential to the conservation of the Please note that submissions merely (2) Specific areas outside the species that should be included in the stating support for or opposition to the geographical area occupied by the designation and why; action under consideration without species at the time it is listed, upon a (c) What areas not occupied at the providing supporting information, determination that such areas are time of listing are essential for the although noted, will not be considered essential for the conservation of the conservation of the species and why; in making a determination, as section species. Conservation, as defined under (d) What may constitute ‘‘physical or 4(b)(2) of the Act directs that critical section 3 of the Act, means to use and biological features essential to the habitat designations be made based on the use of all methods and procedures conservation of the species,’’ within the the best scientific data available and that are necessary to bring an geographical range currently occupied after consideration of economic and endangered or threatened species to the by the species; other relevant impacts. You may submit your comments and point at which the measures provided (e) Where the ‘‘physical or biological pursuant to the Act are no longer features essential to the conservation of materials concerning this proposed rule by one of the methods listed in the necessary. Such methods and the species,’’ features are currently procedures include, but are not limited found; ADDRESSES section. We request that you send comments only by the methods to, all activities associated with (f) Information indicating how these scientific resources management such as species respond to natural and described in the ADDRESSES section.
Recommended publications
  • Colorado Wildlife Action Plan: Proposed Rare Plant Addendum
    Colorado Wildlife Action Plan: Proposed Rare Plant Addendum By Colorado Natural Heritage Program For The Colorado Rare Plant Conservation Initiative June 2011 Colorado Wildlife Action Plan: Proposed Rare Plant Addendum Colorado Rare Plant Conservation Initiative Members David Anderson, Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) Rob Billerbeck, Colorado Natural Areas Program (CNAP) Leo P. Bruederle, University of Colorado Denver (UCD) Lynn Cleveland, Colorado Federation of Garden Clubs (CFGC) Carol Dawson, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Michelle DePrenger-Levin, Denver Botanic Gardens (DBG) Brian Elliott, Environmental Consulting Mo Ewing, Colorado Open Lands (COL) Tom Grant, Colorado State University (CSU) Jill Handwerk, Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) Tim Hogan, University of Colorado Herbarium (COLO) Steve Kettler, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Andrew Kratz, U.S. Forest Service (USFS) Sarada Krishnan, Colorado Native Plant Society (CoNPS), Denver Botanic Gardens Brian Kurzel, Colorado Natural Areas Program Eric Lane, Colorado Department of Agriculture (CDA) Paige Lewis, The Nature Conservancy (TNC) Ellen Mayo, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mitchell McGlaughlin, University of Northern Colorado (UNC) Jennifer Neale, Denver Botanic Gardens Betsy Neely, The Nature Conservancy Ann Oliver, The Nature Conservancy Steve Olson, U.S. Forest Service Susan Spackman Panjabi, Colorado Natural Heritage Program Jeff Peterson, Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Josh Pollock, Center for Native Ecosystems (CNE) Nicola Ripley,
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened, Endangered, Candidate & Proposed Plant Species of Utah
    TECHNICAL NOTE USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service Boise, Idaho and Salt Lake City, Utah TN PLANT MATERIALS NO. 52 MARCH 2011 THREATENED, ENDANGERED, CANDIDATE & PROPOSED PLANT SPECIES OF UTAH Derek Tilley, Agronomist, NRCS, Aberdeen, Idaho Loren St. John, PMC Team Leader, NRCS, Aberdeen, Idaho Dan Ogle, Plant Materials Specialist, NRCS, Boise, Idaho Casey Burns, State Biologist, NRCS, Salt Lake City, Utah Last Chance Townsendia (Townsendia aprica). Photo by Megan Robinson. This technical note identifies the current threatened, endangered, candidate and proposed plant species listed by the U.S.D.I. Fish and Wildlife Service (USDI FWS) in Utah. Review your county list of threatened and endangered species and the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Conservation Data Center (CDC) GIS T&E database to see if any of these species have been identified in your area of work. Additional information on these listed species can be found on the USDI FWS web site under “endangered species”. Consideration of these species during the planning process and determination of potential impacts related to scheduled work will help in the conservation of these rare plants. Contact your Plant Material Specialist, Plant Materials Center, State Biologist and Area Biologist for additional guidance on identification of these plants and NRCS responsibilities related to the Endangered Species Act. 2 Table of Contents Map of Utah Threatened, Endangered and Candidate Plant Species 4 Threatened & Endangered Species Profiles Arctomecon humilis Dwarf Bear-poppy ARHU3 6 Asclepias welshii Welsh’s Milkweed ASWE3 8 Astragalus ampullarioides Shivwits Milkvetch ASAM14 10 Astragalus desereticus Deseret Milkvetch ASDE2 12 Astragalus holmgreniorum Holmgren Milkvetch ASHO5 14 Astragalus limnocharis var.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Species Assessment and Listing Priority Assignment Form
    U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE SPECIES ASSESSMENT AND LISTING PRIORITY ASSIGNMENT FORM Scientific Name: Penstemon scariosus var. albifluvis Common Name: White River beardtongue Lead region: Region 6 (Mountain-Prairie Region) Information current as of: 03/29/2012 Status/Action ___ Funding provided for a proposed rule. Assessment not updated. ___ Species Assessment - determined species did not meet the definition of the endangered or threatened under the Act and, therefore, was not elevated to the Candidate status. ___ New Candidate _X_ Continuing Candidate ___ Candidate Removal ___ Taxon is more abundant or widespread than previously believed or not subject to the degree of threats sufficient to warrant issuance of a proposed listing or continuance of candidate status ___ Taxon not subject to the degree of threats sufficient to warrant issuance of a proposed listing or continuance of candidate status due, in part or totally, to conservation efforts that remove or reduce the threats to the species ___ Range is no longer a U.S. territory ___ Insufficient information exists on biological vulnerability and threats to support listing ___ Taxon mistakenly included in past notice of review ___ Taxon does not meet the definition of "species" ___ Taxon believed to be extinct ___ Conservation efforts have removed or reduced threats ___ More abundant than believed, diminished threats, or threats eliminated. Petition Information ___ Non-Petitioned _X_ Petitioned - Date petition received: 05/11/2004 90-Day Positive:05/11/2005 12 Month Positive:10/26/2011
    [Show full text]
  • Demographic Modeling Informs Functional Connectivity and Management Interventions in Graham’S Beardtongue
    Conservation Genetics https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-021-01392-9 RESEARCH ARTICLE Demographic modeling informs functional connectivity and management interventions in Graham’s beardtongue Matthew R. Jones1 · Daniel E. Winkler2 · Rob Massatti1 Received: 16 December 2020 / Accepted: 30 July 2021 © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Functional connectivity (i.e., the movement of individuals across a landscape) is essential for the maintenance of genetic vari- ation and persistence of rare species. However, illuminating the processes infuencing functional connectivity and ultimately translating this knowledge into management practice remains a fundamental challenge. Here, we combine various population structure analyses with pairwise, population-specifc demographic modeling to investigate historical functional connectivity in Graham’s beardtongue (Penstemon grahamii), a rare plant narrowly distributed across a dryland region of the western US. While principal component and population structure analyses indicated an isolation-by-distance pattern of diferentiation across the species’ range, spatial inferences of efective migration exposed an abrupt shift in population ancestry near the range center. To understand these seemingly conficting patterns, we tested various models of historical gene fow and found evidence for recent admixture (~ 3400 generations ago) between populations near the range center. This historical perspective reconciles population structure patterns and suggests management eforts should focus on maintaining connectivity between
    [Show full text]
  • View Full Text Article
    U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE SPECIES ASSESSMENT AND LISTING PRIORITY ASSIGNMENT FORM SCIENTIFIC NAME: Penstemon grahamii COMMON NAME: Graham ’s beardtongue or Graham ’s penstemon LEAD REGION: 6 INFORMATION CURRENT AS OF: October, 2004 STATUS/ACTION: Initial 12-month Petition Finding: not warranted warranted warranted but precluded (also complete (c) and (d) in section on petitioned candidate species- why action is precluded) Species assessment - determined species did not meet the definition of endangered or threatened under the Act and, therefore, was not elevated to Candidate status ___ New candidate X Continuing candidate __ Non-petitioned X Petitioned - Date petition received: October 8, 2002 90-day positive - FR date: 12-month warranted but precluded - FR date: Is the petition requesting a reclassification of a listed species? ___ Listing priority change Former LP: ___ New LP: ___ Latest Date species became a Candidate: July 1, 1975 Listing priority changed to LPN 2 (69 FR 24882, May 4, 2004). N/A Candidate removal: Former LP: ___ ___ A - Taxon is more abundant or widespread than previously believed or not subject to the degree of threats sufficient to warrant issuance of a proposed listing or continuance of candidate status. ___ F - Range is no longer a U.S. territory. I - Insufficient information exists on biological vulnerability and threats to support listing. ___ M - Taxon mistakenly included in past notice of review. ___ N - Taxon may not meet the Act ’s definition of “ species. ” ___ X - Taxon believed to be extinct. ANIMAL/PLANT
    [Show full text]
  • Aquilegia Newsletter of the Colorado Native Plant Society “
    Aquilegia Newsletter of the Colorado Native Plant Society “. dedicated to the appreciation and conservation of the Colorado native flora” CONSERVATION CORNER PARTNERSHIPS An Introduction to the Bureau of Land Management’s Botany Program By Peter Gordon and Carol Dawson Editor’s Note: The goals of the Colorado Native Plant reflect Bureau priorities: (1) Managing healthy native plant Society are shared by many government agencies, as well as by communities, (2) Managing special status plant species, and (3) private organizations and individuals. Conservation of Managing non-native invasive plant species. This article will Colorado’s unique and special plant life cannot be accomplished focus specifically on introducing BLM plant conservation without their efforts. initiatives using a small selection of our special status plant This is the first in a series of articles highlighting the projects as examples. programs, goals, and accomplishments of our many partners. Eight of the 13 plant species in Colorado protected by the We begin with the Bureau of Land Management, manager of Endangered Species Act are found on BLM lands. This makes nearly one in every eight acres of land and habitat in Colorado. the collection of robust quantitative information regarding the Nationwide, the BLM (a part of the Department of the Interior) is location, life history, and status of these species very important. responsible for the management and conservation of resources In addition to its role in managing for Federally listed plant on 256 million surface acres, as well as 700 million acres of species, BLM designates sensitive species status for other rare subsurface mineral estate.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding of No Significant Impact Canyon Rims (Indian Creek) Travel Management Plan
    May 2021 Finding of No Significant Impact Canyon Rims (Indian Creek) Travel Management Plan DOI-BLM-UT-Y010-2018-0220-EA Moab Field Office 82 East Dogwood Moab, Utah 84532 Phone: 435-259-2100 FAX: 435-259-2106 Canyon Rims (Indian Creek) Travel Management Plan Finding of No Significant Impact DOI-BLM-UT-Y010-2018-0220 I have reviewed the Canyon Rims (Indian Creek) Travel Management Plan Environmental Assessment (EA): DOI-BLM-UT-Y0101-2018-0220-EA. After considering the environmental effects as described in the EA, and incorporated herein, I have determined that Alternative C, as identified in the EA, will not significantly affect the quality of the human environment and that an Environmental Impact Statement is not required. I have determined that the Proposed Action, which is to designate a comprehensive off-highway vehicle (OHV) travel management plan (TMP) for the Canyon Rims (Indian Creek) Travel Management Area (TMA), is in conformance with the approved 2008 Moab Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan (2008 RMP) and is consistent with applicable plans and policies of county, state, Tribal and Federal agencies. This finding is based on my consideration of the Council on Environmental Quality’s (CEQ) criteria for significance (40 CFR 1508.27) regarding the context and the intensity of impacts described in the EA. Context The TMA that forms the basis of the Canyon Rims TMP contains 90,955 acres of Bureau of Land Management (BLM) managed lands. Approximately 273 miles of road were designated as OHV-Open in the Travel Plan accompanying the 2008 RMP; these previously-designated routes constitute the route inventory for the project.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Summer Newsletter
    AMERICAN PENSTEMON SOCIETY— Http://PENSTEMONS.ORG TheNEWSLETTER Pe OF THE n AMERICAN st e m PENSTEMON a n iSOCIETY a c ESTABLISHED 1946 VOLUME 11 NO 3 SUMMER 2017 This picture shows the hillside and parking lot of the first stop on the North field trip, Monday June 5, 30 miles out of Vernal. THE PENSTEMANIAC | Vernal’sSUMMER altitude2017 | P isAGE 5,328’ 1 and this area is 3000’ higher. Photo by Andrey Zarkikh, courtesy of Catherine King. AMERICAN PENSTEMON SOCIETY— Http://PENSTEMONS.ORG Penstemon Adventure Table of Contents in the Uinta Basin Penstemon Adventure in the Uinta Basin ...............2 by Catherine King Recollections of Hell’s Hole Canyon ..................... 10 Editor’s note: we are grateful to Catherine Letter from the President ..................................... 11 King, author of this Article, for granting The Mystery of Penstemon Hesperius .................. 12 permission to allow The Penstemaniac to Final Project Report to American Penstemon reprint her article appearing in the Summer Society Special Projects Grants Program ....... 14 volume of UNPS’s Newsletter, SegoLily Update on key to Genus Penstemon on “Flora of Vol. 40 No 3. North America” Volume 17 ............................. 17 New Members ...................................................... 17 The American Penstemon Society 2018 APS Annual Meeting – Las Vegas NV ......... 18 (APS) has been hosting annual meetings Call for Seeds: APS 2017-18 ................................ 19 for decades, where penstemon lovers, Jackpot! Noel’s 5-Penstemon Discovery Day ....... 20 fondly known as “penstemaniacs,” gather American Penstemon Society Membership Form . 21 together to see penstemons growing in AmazonSmile .......................................................22 their native habitats. This year’s meeting 2017 APS meeting in Vernal Utah ........................23 was in Vernal, Utah and I admit to being APS Officers .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Rare Plant Conservation Strategy
    Plants have too long been hidden in plain sight. The prospect of continued threats to the nation’s plant life, coupled with the large proportion of the flora already at risk, argues that now is the time to bring plants out from COLO R A D O RA R E P L A nt the background, and to put the conservation needs of our nation’s flora COnsERVATION StrATEgy squarely into view. -Stein and Gravuer, NatureServe, 2008 Printed on recycled paper. BY: THE RARE PLAnt COnsERVATION InITIATIVE | MAY 2009 Plants are essential to both wildlife and humans through provision of key services such as food, shelter, fiber, and medicine ... protecting our wild flora goes to the heart of the human condition. Yet without focused conservation attention to the growing plight of the nation’s plant species, we are at risk of losing significant portions of our wild heritage, and the ecological resilience that comes with that diversity. -Stein and Gravuer, NatureServe, 2008 North Park phacelia © Frank Weston RECOMMENDED CITATION Neely, B., S. Panjabi, E. Lane, P. Lewis, C. Dawson, A. Kratz, B. Kurzel, T. Hogan, J. Handwerk, S. Krishnan, J. Neale, and N. Ripley. 2009. Colorado Rare Plant Conservation Strategy. Developed by the Colorado Rare Plant Conservation Initiative. The Nature Conservancy, Boulder, Colorado. 117 pp. AUTHORS Carol Dawson, Bureau of Land Management Jill Handwerk, Colorado Natural Heritage Program Tim Hogan, University of Colorado Herbarium Andrew Kratz, U.S. Forest Service Sarada Krishnan, Colorado Native Plant Society and Denver Botanic Gardens Brian Kurzel, Colorado Natural Areas Program Eric Lane, Colorado Department of Agriculture Paige Lewis, The Nature Conservancy Jennifer Neale, Denver Botanic Gardens Betsy Neely, The Nature Conservancy Susan Spackman Panjabi, Colorado Natural Heritage Program Nicola Ripley, Betty Ford Alpine Gardens COLORADO RARE PLANT CONSERVATION INITIATIVE MEMBERS David Anderson, Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) Rob Billerbeck, Colorado Natural Areas Program (CNAP) Leo P.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Status Plant Species Report: 2018 Lease Sale Vernal Field Office, Vernal UT
    Special Status Plant Species Report: 2018 Lease Sale Vernal Field Office, Vernal UT Photo: Christine Cimiluca Christine Cimiluca, Botanist BLM Green River District June 18, 2018 Special Status Plant Species Report December 2018 Lease Sale Species Status Potential Occurrence and Parcels with Lease Stipulation or Habitat Type Suitable or Notice Applied Occupied Habitat Aquilegia atwoodii BLM Known only from Firewater None NA (Atwood columbine) Sensitive Canyon tributary to Desolation Canyon. Habitat is not present in the Project Area. Aquilegia scopulorum BLM Semi-barrens of the Green River None NA var. goodrichii Sensitive Formation, West Tavaputs (Goodrich columbine) Plateau. Habitat is not present in the Project Area Arabis vivariensis / BLM Pinyon-juniper and mountain None NA Boechera fernaldiana Sensitive mahogany communities, often in (park rockcress) sandy soil. Specimens seen are from Jones Hole and Dinosaur National Monument. Habitat is not present in the Project Area. Astragalus equisolensis BLM Duchesne River Formation in 105, 125 UT-LN-49 (Utah Sensitive (horseshoe milkvetch) Sensitive sagebrush, shadscale, Species) horsebrush and other mixed UT-LN-51 (Special Status desert shrub communities. 4800- Plants: Not Federally 5200 ft. Listed) UT-LN-89 (Horseshoe milkvetch [Astragalus equisolensis]) Astragalus hamiltonii BLM Habitat includes eroding slopes None NA (Hamilton milkvetch) Sensitive of the Duchesne River, Wasatch, and less commonly Mowry Shale, Dakota, and other formations in desert shrub and pinyon-juniper plant communities from 5,500 to 6,740 ft. Cleomella palmeriana BLM Mixed desert shrub communities. None NA var. goodrichii Sensitive Specimens seen are from the (Rocky Mountain Morrison Formation near Island stickweed) Park, Uintah County, Utah. Habitat is not present in the Project Area.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2017 Society News Northern Nevada Events Southern
    Volume 43 Number 7 - September 2017 Society News Northern Nevada October 5 – Rare Plants in Real Life: Case studies from a mine, a water pipeline, and Events a highway presented by Kris Kuyper, Biology Program Manager for EM Strategies. September 7 – Plant Colors…Beauty and Science all Around Us presented by Jim November 2 – Janel Johnson, NNPS Bishop, a California Native Plant Society President, will provide us with an overview Fellow. Here’s a taste of what to expect: of iNaturalist.org, a website to share your natural history observations and help others Plants offer endless, engaging beauty identify their contributions. in their many colors. There are the blooms of spring in our foothills, lovely desert and mountain wildflowers, the glorious leaves of autumn, and even the beauty of the universal Southern Nevada greens of leaves before they turn. There are interesting stories in all of that. Events Part of the story will be about the science: how do plant colors arise, how do September 11 – Nicole Hupp, ecologist conditions such as acidity change pigment with the National Park Service Inventory & colors, what purpose do they serve? The Monitoring Program, 6:30-7:30 pm. Meet interesting questions are endless (and not at the U.S. Geological Survey office at 160 all of the answers are known). You’ll gain North Stephanie Street in Henderson. Note some background that will enrich your that there is no meeting on Labor Day, understanding and appreciation of plant Monday, September 4. colors - the fact that plants provide us a key part of the visual means we use to see their Our program coordinator is Lesley beautiful colors, for instance - and you’ll have DeFalco.
    [Show full text]