(1999/C 135/098) WRITTEN QUESTION E-2634/98 by Otto Von

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

C 135/84 Official Journal of the European Communities EN 14.5.1999 (1999/C 135/098) WRITTEN QUESTION E-2634/98 by Otto von Habsburg (PPE), Hiltrud Breyer (V), Charles Goerens (ELDR), Klaus-Heiner Lehne (PPE), Claudia Roth (V), Wilmya Zimmermann (PSE) and Karl Habsburg-Lothringen (PPE) to the Council (1 September 1998) Subject: Visa requirements for Bulgaria and Romania − expert reports Several commissions of experts have recently visited Bulgaria and Romania to consider the visa problem there. No reports have yet been published on these visits. If such expert reports already exist, when will the Council be submitting them to Parliament? What conclusions has the Council reached in this matter? If a report or reports of this kind have not yet been drawn up, when will they be compiled? Reply (16 November 1998) Since it is not associated with the expert commissions mentioned by the Honourable Members, the Council has no knowledge of the existence or otherwise of any reports drawn up by such commissions. (1999/C 135/099) WRITTEN QUESTION E-2636/98 by Hiltrud Breyer (V), Otto von Habsburg (PPE), Charles Goerens (ELDR), Klaus-Heiner Lehne (PPE), Claudia Roth (V), Wilmya Zimmermann (PSE) and Karl Habsburg-Lothringen (PPE) to the Council (1 September 1998) Subject: Visa requirement for Bulgaria and Romania 1. How, in the Council’s opinion, can the strategy for bringing Bulgaria and Romania closer to the European Union be reconciled with the visa requirement for their nationals, seeing that two EU institutions, the European Parliament and the Commission, have argued for the removal of these countries from the common list compiled pursuant to Article 100c of the Treaty establishing the European Community and that the European Parliament will shortly be reaffirming this position? 2. What are the Council’s reason for refusing to withdraw the visa requirement in respect of these countries? 3. Is the Council aware of the sometimes unreasonable conditions under which visas are issued to Bulgarian and Romanian nationals for entry into a Member Sate of the EU? Does the Council intend to ease the requirements and conditions for the issue of such visas and to abolish them in the foreseeable future? 4. Does the Council regard the proportion of Roma people in the two countries as an obstacle to the removal of the latter from the common list? If so, why? Reply (7/8 December 1998) Currently there is no Commission proposal before the Council to remove Bulgaria and Romania from the list of third countries whose nationals must be in possession of a visa when crossing the external frontiers of the Member States. The Council is not aware of the difficulties mentioned by the Honourable Members concerning the granting of visas. Currently, the requirements and conditions laid down for granting visas are not harmonised at Community level..

Copy Link

Recommended publications

En En *** Recommendation
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2009 - 2014 Plenary sitting A7-0134/2014 20.2.2014 *** RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Partnership and cooperation between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Indonesia, of the other part, with the exception of matters related to readmission (11250/2013 – C7-0351/2013 – 2013/0120A(NLE)) Committee on Foreign Affairs Rapporteur: Ana Gomes RR\1020467EN.doc PE522.786v02-00 EN United in diversityEN PR_NLE-AP_art90 Symbols for procedures * Consultation procedure *** Consent procedure ***I Ordinary legislative procedure (first reading) ***II Ordinary legislative procedure (second reading) ***III Ordinary legislative procedure (third reading) (The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the draft act.) PE522.786v02-00 2/6 RR\1020467EN.doc EN CONTENTS Page DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION .................................5 RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................6 RR\1020467EN.doc 3/6 PE522.786v02-00 EN PE522.786v02-00 4/6 RR\1020467EN.doc EN DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Partnership and cooperation between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Indonesia, of the other part, with the exception of matters related to readmission (11250/2013 – C7-0351/2013 – 2013/0120A(NLE))
[Show full text]
European Parliament
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ««« « « « « 1999 « « 2004 ««« Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy PE/VII/PV/03-06/REV MINUTES of the meeting of Wednesday, 23 April 2003, 09.00 - 12.30 and 15.00-18.30 and Thursday, 24 April 2003, 09.00 - 12.30 and 15.00-18.30 BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 09.09 on Wednesday, 23 April 2003, with Carlos Westendorp y Cabeza, chairman, in the chair. 1. Adoption of draft agenda PE 316.274/REV. The draft agenda was adopted with some changes: - Item 12 (H.P. Martin report ) would be voted on after Item 18. 2. Chairman's announcements None 3. Approval of the minutes of the meetings of: 10 March 2003 PE 316.306 19-20 March 2003 PE 316.308 25 March 2003 PE 316.307 The minutes were approved. In the presence of the Council and Commission Presentation of Council common positions (Rule 76 (2) of the Rules of Procedure) 4. Production and development of Community statistics on science and technology *** II T07451 - (COD010197 - COM(01)0489) (COD010197 - A5-0236/02) (COD010197 - C5-0130/03) PV\481010EN.doc PE 316.309 Or. fr EN EN Rapporteur: Giuseppe Nisticò Speakers: rapporteur, Eryl Margaret McNally, Bashir Khanbhai, Withworth (Commission) Decision: the common position was announced Deadline for tabling amendments: 12.00 on Tuesday, 6 May 2003 5. Cultural industries T07853 Draftsperson: Seán Ó Neachtain Exchange of views Speakers: draftsperson, chairman, Myrsini Zorba, Reino Paasilinna, Kosmopoulos (Commission) 6. Implementation of macro-financial assistance to third countries T08144 PE 321.971/REV. PE 321.971/AM.
[Show full text]
Appendix to Memorandum of Law on Behalf of United
APPENDIX TO MEMORANDUM OF LAW ON BEHALF OF UNITED KINGDOM AND EUROPEAN PARLIAMENTARIANS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION LIST OF AMICI HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND AND MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT House of Lords The Lord Ahmed The Lord Alderdice The Lord Alton of Liverpool, CB The Rt Hon the Lord Archer of Sandwell, QC PC The Lord Avebury The Lord Berkeley, OBE The Lord Bhatia, OBE The Viscount Bledisloe, QC The Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury The Rt Hon the Baroness Boothroyd, OM PC The Lord Borrie, QC The Rt Hon the Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone, DL PC The Lord Bowness, CBE DL The Lord Brennan, QC The Lord Bridges, GCMG The Rt Hon the Lord Brittan of Spennithorne, QC DL PC The Rt Hon the Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville, CH PC The Viscount Brookeborough, DL The Rt Hon the Lord Browne-Wilkinson, PC The Lord Campbell of Alloway, ERD QC The Lord Cameron of Dillington The Rt Hon the Lord Cameron of Lochbroom, QC The Rt Rev and Rt Hon the Lord Carey of Clifton, PC The Lord Carlile of Berriew, QC The Baroness Chapman The Lord Chidgey The Lord Clarke of Hampstead, CBE The Lord Clement-Jones, CBE The Rt Hon the Lord Clinton-Davis, PC The Lord Cobbold, DL The Lord Corbett of Castle Vale The Rt Hon the Baroness Corston, PC The Lord Dahrendorf, KBE The Lord Dholakia, OBE DL The Lord Donoughue The Baroness D’Souza, CMG The Lord Dykes The Viscount Falkland The Baroness Falkner of Margravine The Lord Faulkner of Worcester The Rt Hon the
[Show full text]
11. Explanations of Vote 12. Corrections to Votes
C 77 E/90 Official Journal of the European Union EN 26.3.2004 Wednesday 24 September 2003 11. Explanations of vote Written explanations of vote: Explanations of vote submitted in writing under Rule 137(3) appear in the verbatim report of proceedings for this sitting. Oral explanations of vote: Report McCarthy A5-0238/2003: Nuala Ahern, Brian Crowley, Hiltrud Breyer, Jean-Maurice Dehousse, Daniela Raschhofer Report Jonckheer A5-0302/2003: Agnes Schierhuber Report Andersson A5-0259/2003: Carlo Fatuzzo, Francesco Enrico Speroni Report Gil-Robles Gil-Delgado and Tsatsos A5-0299/2003: Carles-Alfred Gasòliba i Böhm, Jean-Maurice Dehousse, Bernd Posselt, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Robert Goebbels 12. Corrections to votes Corrections to votes were submitted by the following Members: Report Brok A5-0306/2003 amendment 10 for: Paul Coûteaux, Fodé Sylla against: Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Lissy Gröner, W.G. van Velzen amendment 4 for: Fodé Sylla abstention: Walter Veltroni, Philip Claeys, Koenraad Dillen recommendation against: Fodé Sylla abstention: Geneviève Fraisse Report McCarthy A5-0238/2003 amendments 52, 54/rev and 68 (identical) against: Christa Klaß amendment 69 for: Klaus Hänsch, Marie-Thérèse Hermange, Olga Zrihen, Othmar Karas against: Hans-Gert Poettering, Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl amendments 55/rev, 97 and 108 (identical) for: Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Pervenche Berès, Hubert Pirker, Olga Zrihen article 4, paragraph 1 amendment 16 cp against: Béatrice Patrie, Bernard Poignant, Othmar Karas, Michel Rocard article 4, paragraph
[Show full text]
Biopatents – a Threat to the Use and Conservation of Agrobiodiversity?
Advisory Board on Biodiversity and Genetic Resources at the Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection (BMELV) Biopatents – A Threat to the Use and Conservation of Agrobiodiversity? Position Paper of the Advisory Board on Biodiversity and Genetic Resources at the Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection (Translation of German original paper) May 2010 Lead author Dr. Peter H. Feindt, Cardiff University Members of the Advisory Board on Biodiversity and Genetic Resources at the BMELV (05/2010) Prof. Dr. Bärbel Gerowitt, University of Rostock (Chair) Dr. Peter H. Feindt, Cardiff University, Great Britain (Vice Chair) Dr. Frank Begemann, Federal Office for Agriculture and Food, Bonn Prof. Dr. Leo Dempfle, Technical University Muinch (TUM) Dr. Jan Engels, Bioversity International, Italy Dr. Lothar Frese, Julius Kuehn-Institute, Quedlinburg Prof. Dr. Hans-Rolf Gregorius, University of Goettingen Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Alois Heißenhuber, Technical University Muinch (TUM) Prof. Dr. Hans-Jörg Jacobsen, University of Hannover Dr. Alwin Janßen, Northwest German Forest Research Institute, Hann. Münden Dr. Ingrid Kissling-Näf, Federal Office for Professional Education and Technology, Switzerland Prof. Dr. Konrad Ott, University of Greifswald Prof. Dr. Lucia Reisch, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark Prof. em. Dr. Werner Steffens, Deutscher Fischerei-Verband e. V., (German Fisheries Association), Bonn Dr. Steffen Weigend, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Mariensee Citation of this paper Peter H. Feindt, Advisory Board on Biodiversity and Genetic Resources at the BMELV, 2010: Biopatents – A Threat to the Use and Conservation of Agrobiodiversity? Position Paper of the Advisory Board on Biodiversity and Genetic Resources at the Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection (BMELV), 36 pp.
[Show full text]
Europäisches Parlament Protokoll De De
EUROPÄISCHES PARLAMENT 2007 - 2008 PROTOKOLL der Sitzung vom Mittwoch 20. Juni 2007 P6_PV-PROV(2007)06-20 vorläufige Ausgabe PE 391.043 DE DE * Verfahren der Konsultation ** I Verfahren der Zusammenarbeit: erste Lesung ** II Verfahren der Zusammenarbeit: zweite Lesung *** Verfahren der Zustimmung ***I Verfahren der Mitentscheidung: erste Lesung ***II Verfahren der Mitentscheidung: zweite Lesung ***III Verfahren der Mitentscheidung: dritte Lesung (Das angegebene Verfahren entspricht der von der Kommission vorgeschlagenen Rechtsgrundlage.) HINWEIS ZUR ABSTIMMUNGSSTUNDE Falls nicht anders angegeben, haben die Berichterstatter dem Präsidenten ihre Haltung zu den Änderungsanträgen schriftlich mitgeteilt. ABKÜRZUNGEN DER AUSSCHÜSSE AFET: Ausschuss für auswärtige Angelegenheiten DEVE: Entwicklungsausschuss INTA: Ausschuss für internationalen Handel BUDG: Haushaltsausschuss CONT: Haushaltskontrollausschuss ECON: Ausschuss für Wirtschaft und Währung EMPL: Ausschuss für Beschäftigung und soziale Angelegenheiten ENVI: Ausschuss für Umweltfragen, Volksgesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit ITRE: Ausschuss für Industrie, Forschung und Energie IMCO: Ausschuss für Binnenmarkt und Verbraucherschutz TRAN: Ausschuss für Verkehr und Fremdenverkehr REGI: Ausschuss für regionale Entwicklung AGRI: Ausschuss für Landwirtschaft und ländliche Entwicklung PECH: Fischereiausschuss CULT: Ausschuss für Kultur und Bildung JURI: Rechtsausschuss LIBE: Ausschuss für bürgerliche Freiheiten, Justiz und Inneres AFCO: Ausschuss für konstitutionelle Fragen FEMM: Ausschuss
[Show full text]
En En Opinion
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2009 - 2014 Committee on Foreign Affairs 2013/0225(NLE) 16.1.2014 OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs for the Committee on International Trade on the draft Council decision authorising Member States to ratify, in the interests of the European Union, the Arms Trade Treaty (12178/2013 – C7-0233/2013 – 2013/0225(NLE)) Rapporteur: Krzysztof Lisek AD\1014893EN.doc PE523.065v02-00 EN United in diversity EN PA_Leg_Consent PE523.065v02-00 2/4 AD\1014893EN.doc EN SHORT JUSTIFICATION The EP welcomes the UN Resolution A/67/L.58 adopting by overwhelming majority the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), after long negotiations culminating in a legally binding instrument of the highest standards to regulate and improve the international trade in conventional arms. The ATT is establishing the first global regulation of legal trade of arms, it will prevent illegal trade of weapons, international terrorism and organized crime and limit serious violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law. The EU exports are under the 2008 Common Position which sets up rules and standards to be followed, as one of the major actors in this field therefore, the EU is directly concerned with the success of the ATT: as it not only establishes a level playing field for this trade but, more important, regulates a commerce of the kind of weapons most used in local wars, terrorist attacks or civil and other uprisings. The main strong point of the ATT is that State Parties are obliged to establish a national control system for these transfers and to evaluate, before authorising any transfer, the risk that these arms could impair the peace and security or could be used to commit serious violations to international humanitarian law or human rights or to commit acts of terrorism.
[Show full text]
European Parliament
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2004 2009 Session document 24.9.2007 B6-0351/2007 } B6-0352/2007 } B6-0353/2007 } B6-0354/2007 } B6-0355/2007 } B6-0356/2007 } RC1 JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 103(4) of the Rules of Procedure, by – Marianne Thyssen, Malcolm Harbour, Andreas Schwab and Corien Wortmann- Kool, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group – Evelyne Gebhardt, Erika Mann, Reino Paasilinna and Guido Sacconi, on behalf of the PSE Group – Toine Manders and Frédérique Ries, on behalf of the ALDE Group – Cristiana Muscardini, Roberta Angelilli and Adriana Poli Bortone, on behalf of the UEN Group – Hiltrud Breyer, Heide Rühle and Carl Schlyter, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group – André Brie and Marco Rizzo, on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group replacing the motions by the following groups: – ALDE (B6-0351/2007) – PPE-DE (B6-0352/2007) – GUE/NGL (B6-0353/2007) – PSE (B6-0354/2007) – UEN (B6-0355/2007) – Verts/ALE (B6-0356/2007) on safety of products, particularly toys RC\686344EN.doc PE394.773v01-00} PE394.775v01-00} PE394.792v01-00} PE394.793v01-00} PE394.794v01-00} PE394.795v01-00} RC1 EN EN European Parliament resolution on safety of products, particularly toys The European Parliament, – having regard to Directive 88/378/EEC1 on the safety of toys, – having regard to Directive 2001/95/EC2 on general product safety, – having regard to opinions of the scientific committees of the Commission and to various studies undertaken by the Commission on the issue of toy safety, – having regard to existing international agreements with third countries in the area of product safety, especially that of toys, – having regard to Rule 103(4) of its Rules of Procedure, A.
[Show full text]
Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action
Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONTENTS With the European elections approaching, CAN The scores were based on the votes of all MEPs on Austria 2 Europe wanted to provide people with some these ten issues. For each vote, MEPs were either Belgium 3 background information on how Members of the given a point for voting positively (i.e. either ‘for’ Bulgaria 4 European Parliament (MEPs) and political parties or ‘against’, depending on if the text furthered or Cyprus 5 represented in the European Parliament – both hindered the development of climate and energy Czech Republic 6 national and Europe-wide – have supported or re- policies) or no points for any of the other voting Denmark 7 jected climate and energy policy development in behaviours (i.e. ‘against’, ‘abstain’, ‘absent’, ‘didn’t Estonia 8 the last five years. With this information in hand, vote’). Overall scores were assigned to each MEP Finland 9 European citizens now have the opportunity to act by averaging out their points. The same was done France 10 on their desire for increased climate action in the for the European Parliament’s political groups and Germany 12 upcoming election by voting for MEPs who sup- all national political parties represented at the Greece 14 ported stronger climate policies and are running European Parliament, based on the points of their Hungary 15 for re-election or by casting their votes for the respective MEPs. Finally, scores were grouped into Ireland 16 most supportive parties. CAN Europe’s European four bands that we named for ease of use: very Italy 17 Parliament scorecards provide a ranking of both good (75-100%), good (50-74%), bad (25-49%) Latvia 19 political parties and individual MEPs based on ten and very bad (0-24%).
[Show full text]
European Parliament
24 . 4 . 95 EN Official Journal of the European Communities No C 103/ 1 I (Information) EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT WRITTEN QUESTIONS WITH ANSWER WRITTEN QUESTION E-2101/94 WRITTEN QUESTION E-2157/94 by Jesús Cabezón Alonso ( PSE ) by Stephen Hughes ( PSE ) to the Council to the Commission (7 October 1994) (18 October 1994) ( 95/C 103/01 ( 95/C 103/02 ) Subject: IV programme to fight poverty Subject: Risks to public health from mobile hand-held telephones On what criteria did the Council refuse to approve the IV programme to combat social exclusion and encourage Can the Commission provide information on health risks solidarity which had been approved by both Commission posed by the use of hand-held mobile telephone and Parliament ? equipment ? Does the Council not think that even taking account of the Can the Commission provide the information in relation to principle of subsidiarity, the 'added value ' of a Community telephone equipment marketed in the past .and now in use, programme such as this is extremely positive in fighting equipment now being marketed and the next generation of social exclusion and its causes ? equipment and express the risk in relation to the wattage of the equipment in question ? Answer (16 March 199S) Answer given by Mr Flynn on behalf of the Commission (21 February 1995) As the President of the Council said in his address in the debate on combating social exclusion and poverty that took place at the plenary sitting on 27 October 1994 , the Council Exposure to electro-magnetic fields at the frequency range is aware of the dire circumstances of the poorest and most involved in cellular radio telecommunications ( 890 to 1 900 vulnerable groups in our society.
[Show full text]
European Parliament
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT GGG G G G G 1999 G G 2004 G G G Session document FINAL A5-0133/2003 28 April 2003 REPORT on the Communication from the Commission concerning Corporate Social Responsibility: A business contribution to Sustainable Development (COM(2002) 347 - 2002/2261(INI)) Committee on Employment and Social Affairs Rapporteur: Philip Bushill-Matthews RR\316408EN.doc PE 316.408 EN EN PE 316.408 2/27 RR\316408EN.doc EN CONTENTS Page PROCEDURAL PAGE.............................................................................................................. 4 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION ............................................................................................. 5 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT............................................................................................ 12 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, EXTERNAL TRADE, RESEARCH AND ENERGY ........................................................................................................................ 13 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND CONSUMER POLICY ............................................................................................................ 17 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT AND COOPERATION.............. 21 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES................................................................................................................... 25 RR\316408EN.doc 3/27 PE 316.408 EN PROCEDURAL PAGE By letter of 2 July 2002 the Commission forwarded to Parliament
[Show full text]
Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja C Tájékoztatások És Közlemények
C 146 E/32 Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja HU 2008.6.12. 2007. június 19., kedd Charlie McCreevy (a Bizottság tagja) válaszol a szóbeli választ igénylő kérdésre. Felszólal Malcolm Harbour, a PPE-DE képviselőcsoport nevében, Barbara Weiler, a PSE képviselőcsoport nevében, Alexander Lambsdorff, az ALDE képviselőcsoport nevében, Leopold Józef Rutowicz, az UEN kép- viselőcsoport nevében, Andreas Schwab, Karl von Wogau és Charlie McCreevy. A vitát berekesztik. 19. A fémhigany exportjának tilalma és a fémhigany tárolása (vita) Jelentés, amelynek tárgya javaslat az Európai Parlament és a Tanács rendeletére a fémhigany kiviteli tilalmáról és biztonságos tárolásáról [COM(2006)0636 – C6-0363/2006 – 2006/0206(COD)] – Környezetvédelmi, Közegészségügyi és Élelmiszer-biztonsági Bizottság. Előadó: Dimitrios Papadimoulis (A6-0227/2007) Felszólal Charlie McCreevy (a Bizottság tagja) Dimitrios Papadimoulis előterjeszti a jelentést. Felszólal Jens Holm (az INTA bizottság véleményének előadója), Manuel Medina Ortega (a JURI bizottság véleményének előadója), Martin Callanan, a PPE-DE képviselőcsoport nevében, Miguel Ángel Martínez Mar- tínez, a PSE képviselőcsoport nevében, és Marios Matsakis, az ALDE képviselőcsoport nevében. ELNÖKÖL: Miguel Ángel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ alelnök Felszólal Leopold Józef Rutowicz, az UEN képviselőcsoport nevében, Carl Schlyter, a Verts/ALE képviselő- csoport nevében, Jaromír Kohlíček, a GUE/NGL képviselőcsoport nevében, Irena Belohorská, független, Eija- Riitta Korhola, Hegyi Gyula, Hiltrud Breyer, Thomas Ulmer, Åsa Westlund, Marie
[Show full text]