Mediated Learning Experience Criteria and Categories of Interaction
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
APPENDIX A Mediated Learning Experience Criteria and Categories of Interaction This appendix is a brief blueprint of the encoding of MLE interactions accord ing to their mediative meaning. It represents for didactical purposes a short ened version of suggested categories. As such, it is not to be considered as either exhaustive or definitive. I. CRITERIA OF MEDIATED LEARNING INTERACTIONS 1. Intentionality and reciprocity 2. Transcendence 3. Mediation of meaning 4. Mediation of feelings of competence 5. Mediated regulation and control of behavior 6. Mediated sharing behavior 7. Mediation of individuation and psychological differentiation 8. Mediation of goal seeking, goal setting, goal planning, and achieving behavior 9. Mediation of challenge: The search for novelty and complexity 10. Mediation of an awareness of the human being as a changing entity 11. Mediation of an optimistic alternative II. CATEGORIZATION OF MEDIATED INTERACTIONS 1. Mediated focusing 2. Mediated selection of stimuli 3. Mediated scheduling 4. Provoking (requesting) mediation 5. Mediation of positive anticipation 6. Mediated act substitute Based on Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M., & Miller, R. (1980). Instrumental Enrichment (Chap. 2). Baltimore: University Park Press. 263 264 APPENDIX A 7. Mediated imitation 8. Mediated repetition 9. Mediated reinforcement and reward 10. Mediated verbal stimulation 11. Mediated inhibition and control 12. Mediated provision of stimuli 13. Mediated recall short-term 14. Mediated recall long-term 15. Mediated transmission of past 16. Mediated representation of future 17. Mediated identification and description-verbal 18. Mediated identification and description-nonverbal 19. Positive verbal response to mediation 20. Positive nonverbal response to mediation 21. Mediated assuming responsibility 22. Mediated shared responsibility 23. Mediation of cause-and-effect relationship 24. Mediated response-verbal 25. Mediated response-motor 26. Mediated discrimination and sequencing 27. Mediation of spatial orientation 28. Mediation of temporal orientation 29. Mediation of comparative behavior 30. Mediated fostering a sense of completion 31. Mediation of directing attention 32. Mediated association and application 33. Mediated critical interpretation 34. Mediated deductive reasoning 35. Mediated inductive reasoning 36. Mediation of developing inferential thinking 37. Mediation of problem-solving strategies 38. Mediated transmission of values 39. Mediation of need of precision on input levels 40. Mediation of need of precision on output levels 41. Mediation of need for logical evidence on input levels 42. Mediation of need for logical evidence on output levels 43. Mediation of systematic exploration 44. Mediated confrontation of reality 45. Mediated organization of stimuli 46. Mediation of cognitive operation-verbal 47. Mediation of cognitive operation-motor 48. Mediation of perception of feelings-verbal 49. Mediation of perception of feelings-nonverbal 50. Mediation of reciprocity APPENDIX B Deficient Cognitive Functions Inadequate mediated learning experience leads to cognitive functions that are undeveloped, poorly developed, arrested, impaired, or seldom and ineffi ciently used. The locus of such deficiencies may be peripheral (in the gather ing and communication of information) or central (in the elaboration of infor mation), and often reflects attitudinal and motivational deficiencies, lack of learning sets, and lack of internal needs rather than structural incapacity. Evidence of the reversibility of the phenomenon has been provided by clinical and experimental work, especially through dynamic assessment. Clinical use of the learning potential assessment device (LP AD) has also enabled us to establish a partial inventory of deficient cognitive functions, which we have categorized into input, elaboration, and output phases of the mental act. The severity of the impairment at one phase may affect the ability to function at another, but not necessarily. For example, deficiencies at the input phase may also affect the ability to function at phases of elaboration and/or output. There may be highly original, creative, and correct elaboration that nev ertheless yields wrong responses because it is based on inappropriate data at the input phase, or because it cannot be adequately expressed at the output phase. Impaired cognitive functions that are found at the input phase include impairments in the quantity and quality of data gathered by a person con fronted with a given problem, object, or experience. They include the following: 1. Blurred and sweeping perception. 2. Unplanned, impulsive, and unsystematic exploratory behavior. 3. Lack of or impaired receptive verbal tools that affect discrimination (e.g., objects, events, and relationships are not appropriately labeled). 4. Lack of or impaired spatial orientation and lack of stable systems of reference by which to establish topological and Euclidian organization of space. 5. Lack of or impaired temporal concepts. 6. Lack of or impaired conservation of constancies (e.g., size, shape, 265 266 APPENDIX B quantity, color, orientation) across variations in one or more dimensions. 7. Lack of or deficient need for precision and accuracy in data gathering. 8. Lack of capacity for considering two or more sources of information at once. This is reflected in dealing with data in a piecemeal fashion rather than as a unit of facts that are organized. Impaired cognitive functions found at the elaboration phase include those factors that impede the efficient use of available data and existing cues. They are as follows: 1. Inadequacy in the perception of the existence of a problem and its definition. 2. Inability to select relevant, as opposed to irrelevant, cues in defining a problem. 3. Lack of spontaneous comparative behavior or the limitation of its application to a restricted need system. 4. Narrowness of the mental field. 5. Episodic grasp of reality. 6. Lack of need for the eduction or establishment of relationships. 7. Lack of need for, and/or exercise of, summative behavior. 8. Lack of or impaired need for pursuing logical evidence. 9. Lack of or impaired inferential hypothetical ("if") thinking. 10. Lack of or imparied strategies for hypothesis testing. 11. Lack of or impaired planning behavior. 12. Lack of or impaired interiorization. 13. Nonelaboration of certain cognitive categories because the verbal concepts are not a part of the individual verbal inventory on a recep tive level, or because they are not mobilized at the expressive level. Impaired functions found at the output phase include those factors that lead to inadequate communication of insights, answers, and solutions. It should be noted that even adequately perceived data and appropriate elab oration can be expressed as an incorrect or haphazard solution if difficulties exist at this phase. Deficiencies include the following: 1. Egocentric communication modalities. 2. Difficulty in projecting virtual relationships. 3. Blocking. 4. Trial-and-error responses. 5. Lack of or impaired verbal or other tools for communicating ade quately elaborated responses. 6. Lack of or impaired need for precision and accuracy in the commu nication of one's responses. DEFICIENT COGNITIVE FUNCTIONS 267 7. Deficiency of visual transport. 8. Impulsive, random, unplanned behavior. The deficient cognitive functions playa critical role in the process orien tation of dynamic assessment and educational intervention. The LPAD exam iner, as well as the educator, must be thoroughly familiar with them in all of their manifestations to pinpoint the source of subjects' difficulties. APPENDIX C Cognitive Map Another important way to conceptualize the relationship between the charac teristics of a task and its performance by a subject is the cognitive map. This conceptual model is not a map in the topographical sense but a tool by which to locate specific problem areas and to produce changes in corresponding dimensions. The cognitive map describes the mental act in terms of seven parameters that permit us to analyze and interpret a subject's performance. The manipulation of these parameters becomes highly important in the exam iner-subject interaction and in the formation and validation of hypotheses regarding the loci of a subject'S difficulties. The seven parameters are as follows. 1. The universe of content around which the mental act is centered. The compe tence with which subjects deal with a specific body of content is directly related to each subject's experiential, cultural, and educational background. Certain content may be quite unfamiliar to a subject and thus may require such an intensive investment for its mastery that it is no longer useful for providing information about the cognitive functions and operations it in volves, the real target of the assessment. Manipulation of the content in both assessment and intervention will become a source of insight for change. 2. The modality or language in which the mental act is expressed. The modality, which may be verbal, pictOrial, numerical, figural, symbolic, graphic, or any combination of these and other codes, will affect subjects' performance. The parameter of modality is important owing to the fact that the elaborative capacities revealed by subjects on any single modality may not reflect reliably their capacity if the task were presented in another modality. For example, a subject may be able to complete a mathematical operation successfully when the problem is presented