DOCSLIB.ORG

Mutton Snapper and Characterization of the Benthic Habitats and Fish in the Mutton Snapper Seasonal Closed Area, St

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NOAA CORAL REEF GRANT PROGRAM PROJECTS TO IMPROVE OR AMEND CORAL REEF FMPs NA08NMF4410463 Validation of a Spawning Aggregation of Mutton Snapper and Characterization of the Benthic Habitats and Fish in the Mutton Snapper Seasonal Closed Area, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands Submitted to: Caribbean Fishery Management Council San Juan, Puerto Rico Barbara L. Kojis and Norman J. Quinn Date: 15 February 2011 i Table of Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. iii List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 CHAPTER 1 ................................................................................................................................... 4 Mutton Snapper (Lutjanus analis) Spawning Aggregation in the Mutton Snapper Seasonal Closed Area, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands ................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 4 MATERIALS AND METHODS ................................................................................................ 9 Fishing Dates and Methods ..................................................................................................... 9 Scuba Diving Searches for Lutjanus analis .......................................................................... 11 Fish Abundance Assessment by Fishing Effort .................................................................... 12 Biometric Analysis................................................................................................................ 12 Sex Determination ................................................................................................................ 13 Fecundity and Oocyte Size Distribution ............................................................................... 13 Otoliths, Diet, and Genetic Samples ..................................................................................... 14 RESULTS ................................................................................................................................. 16 Catch Results in the Mutton Snapper Seasonal Closed Area ............................................... 16 Reproductive Aspects ........................................................................................................... 21 Length Weight Relationship ................................................................................................. 25 Fecundity and Egg Size Distribution .................................................................................... 26 DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................................... 30 Spawning Season .................................................................................................................. 30 Spawning Aggregation Location .......................................................................................... 32 Status of the Mutton Snapper Aggregation ........................................................................... 33 Size at Onset of Reproduction .............................................................................................. 34 Maximum Length and Age ................................................................................................... 35 Sex Ratio ............................................................................................................................... 36 Fecundity............................................................................................................................... 36 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 37 LITERATURE CITED - CHAPTER 1..................................................................................... 39 APPENDIX 1 ............................................................................................................................ 44 CHAPTER 2 ................................................................................................................................ 45 Habitat Description of the St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands Mutton Snapper Seasonal .............. 45 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 45 METHODS - BENTHIC SURVEY.......................................................................................... 52 RESULTS – BENTHIC SURVEY ........................................................................................... 53 i Prada (2003) Habitat Type - Submerged Aquatic Vegetation on Unconsolidated Sediments ............................................................................................................................................... 54 Prada (2003) Habitat Type - Bare or Mixed Invertebrate on Unconsolidated Sediments .... 61 Coral and Gorgonians on Consolidated Sediments .............................................................. 65 DISCUSSION - BENTHIC SURVEY ..................................................................................... 76 WATER TEMPERATURE ON ST. CROIX ........................................................................... 78 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 78 MATERIALS AND METHODS - TEMPERATURE ............................................................. 78 RESULTS - TEMPERATURE ................................................................................................. 78 DISCUSSION - TEMPERATURE........................................................................................... 80 LITERATURE CITED - CHAPTER 2..................................................................................... 81 APPENDICIES CHAPTER 2 ....................................................................................................... 83 Appendix 1 - Abstract 63rd Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute Meeting ............................... 84 Appendix 2 - Summary of Benthic Habitat Analysis: Benthic Categories ................................... 85 Appendix 3 - Summary of Benthic Habitat Analysis: Coral Species ........................................... 94 CHAPTER 3 ................................................................................................................................. 99 Habitat Focused Fish Surveys in the Mutton Snapper Seasonal Closed Area ............................. 99 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 99 MATERIALS AND METHODS ............................................................................................ 100 Fish and Caribbean Spiny Lobster and Queen Conch Transects ........................................ 100 Roving Fish Censuses ......................................................................................................... 101 Fish Biodiversity ................................................................................................................. 101 RESULTS ............................................................................................................................... 102 Habitat Overview ................................................................................................................ 103 Habitat Summaries .............................................................................................................. 104 Population Abundance of Marketable Fish......................................................................... 109 DISCUSSION ......................................................................................................................... 114 Commercially Harvested Fish Recorded in the MSSCA .................................................... 114 LITERATURE CITED ........................................................................................................... 119 APPENDICIES - CHAPTER 3 .................................................................................................. 121 Appendix 1: List of Presence / Absence of Fish Species by Habitat ...................................... 122 Appendix 2: Benthic Transect Fish Abundance by Habitat ................................................... 134 Appendix 3 - Queen conch (Strombus gigas) Distribution and Abundance in MSSCA Habitats ................................................................................................................................................. 166 Appendix 4 - Abstract 63rd Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute Meeting ......................... 169 CHAPTER 4 ............................................................................................................................... 170 Pilot Study of Back Reef Embayments and Bays on the East End of St. Croix as post settlement habitat for juvenile grouper and snapper .................................................................................... 170 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Preliminary Guide to the Identification of the Early Life History Stages

    Preliminary Guide to the Identification of the Early Life History Stages

    NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-416 PRELIMINARY GUIDE TO TIm IDENTIFICATION OF TIm EARLY LlFE mSTORY STAGES OF BLENNIOID FISHES OF THE WBSTHRN CENTR.AL.ATLANTIC, FAUNAL LIST ANI) MERISTIC DATA FOR All KNOWN BLENNIOID SPECIES gy MARrIN R. CAVALLUZZI AND JOHN E. OLNEY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atniospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Science Center 75 Virginia Beach Drive Miami. Florida 33149 December 1998 NOAA Teclmical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-416 PRELlMINARY GUIDE TO TIlE IDBNTIFlCA110N OF TIlE EARLY LIFE HISTORY STAGES OF BLBNNIOm FISHES OF TIm WBSTBRN CBN'l'R.At·A11..ANi'IC, FAUNAL LIST AND MERISllC DATA" -. FOR ALL KNOWN BLBNNIOID SPECJBS BY ~TIN R. CAVALLUZZI AND JOHN E. OLNEY u.s. DBPAR'I'MffiIT OF COMMERCB William M:Daley, Secretary NatioDal Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration D. JIjDlCS Baker, Under Secretary for OCeaJI.Sand Atmosphere National Marine Fisheries Service , Rolland A. Scbmitten, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries December 1998 This Technical Memorandum series is Used for documentation and timely cot:mD1Urlcationofpreliminazy results, interim reports, or similar special-purpose information. Although the memoranda are not subject to complete formal review, editoPal control, or de1Biled editing, they are expected to reflect smmd professional work. NOTICE .The National Mariiie Fisheries Service (NMFS) does not approve, recommend or endorse any proprietary product or material mentioned in this publication. No reference shati be made to NMFS or to this publication furi:rished by NMFS, in any advertising or salespromoiion which would imply that NMFS approves, recommends, or endorses any proprietary product or proprietary material mentioned herein or which has as its purpose any mtent to cause directly or indirectly the advertised product to be used or purchased because of this NMFS publication.
  • Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Megan E

    Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Megan E

    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School November 2017 Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Megan E. Hepner University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Other Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Hepner, Megan E., "Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary" (2017). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7408 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary by Megan E. Hepner A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Marine Science with a concentration in Marine Resource Assessment College of Marine Science University of South Florida Major Professor: Frank Muller-Karger, Ph.D. Christopher Stallings, Ph.D. Steve Gittings, Ph.D. Date of Approval: October 31st, 2017 Keywords: Species richness, biodiversity, functional diversity, species traits Copyright © 2017, Megan E. Hepner ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to my major advisor, Dr. Frank Muller-Karger, who provided opportunities for me to strengthen my skills as a researcher on research cruises, dive surveys, and in the laboratory, and as a communicator through oral and presentations at conferences, and for encouraging my participation as a full team member in various meetings of the Marine Biodiversity Observation Network (MBON) and other science meetings.
  • Full Text in Pdf Format

    Full Text in Pdf Format

    Vol. 9: 185–192, 2010 AQUATIC BIOLOGY Published online May 12 doi: 10.3354/ab00250 Aquat Biol Microparasite ecology and health status of common bluestriped snapper Lutjanus kasmira from the Pacific Islands Thierry M. Work1,*, Matthias Vignon2, 3, Greta S. Aeby4 1US Geological Survey, National Wildlife Health Center, Honolulu Field Station, PO Box 50167, Honolulu, Hawaii 96850, USA 2Centre de Biologie et d’Ecologie Tropicale et Méditerranéenne, UMR 5244 CNRS-EPHE-UPVD, avenue Paul Alduy, 66860 Perpignan Cedex, France 3Centre de Recherches Insulaires et Observatoire de l’Environnement (CRIOBE), USR 3278 CNRS-EPHE, BP 1013 Papetoia, Moorea, French Polynesia 4Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, PO Box 1346, Kaneohe, Hawaii 96744, USA ABSTRACT: Common bluestriped snappers Lutjanus kasmira were intentionally introduced into Hawaii from the South Pacific in the 1950s and have become well established throughout the archi- pelago. We examined health, prevalence and infection intensity of 2 microparasites, coccidia and epitheliocystis-like organisms (ELO), in L. kasmira from their introduced and native range including the islands where translocated fish originated (Tahiti and Marquesas Islands, French Polynesia) and from several other islands (American Samoa, Fiji and New Caledonia). In addition, we did a longitu- dinal survey of these parasites in the introduced range. Coccidia and ELO were widely distributed and were found on all islands except for New Caledonia. Health indices, as measured by overall organ lesions, body condition and parasite intensity, indicated that fish from Samoa were the least healthy, and fish from Midway (Hawaiian Archipelago) were the healthiest. Microparasite diversity was highest on Midway and Hawaii and lowest on New Caledonia.
  • Reef Snappers (Lutjanidae)

    Reef Snappers (Lutjanidae)

    #05 Reef snappers (Lutjanidae) Two-spot red snapper (Lutjanus bohar) Mangrove red snapper Blacktail snapper (Lutjanus argentimaculatus) (Lutjanus fulvus) Common bluestripe snapper (Lutjanus kasmira) Humpback red snapper Emperor red snapper (Lutjanus gibbus) (Lutjanus sebae) Species & Distribution Habitats & Feeding The family Lutjanidae contains more than 100 species of Although most snappers live near coral reefs, some species tropical and sub-tropical fi sh known as snappers. are found in areas of less salty water in the mouths of rivers. Most species of interest in the inshore fi sheries of Pacifi c Islands belong to the genus Lutjanus, which contains about The young of some species school on seagrass beds and 60 species. sandy areas, while larger fi sh may be more solitary and live on coral reefs. Many species gather in large feeding schools One of the most widely distributed of the snappers in the around coral formations during daylight hours. Pacifi c Ocean is the common bluestripe snapper, Lutjanus kasmira, which reaches lengths of about 30 cm. The species Snappers feed on smaller fi sh, crabs, shrimps, and sea snails. is found in many Pacifi c Islands and was introduced into They are eaten by a number of larger fi sh. In some locations, Hawaii in the 1950s. species such as the two-spot red snapper, Lutjanus bohar, are responsible for ciguatera fi sh poisoning (see the glossary in the Guide to Information Sheets). #05 Reef snappers (Lutjanidae) Reproduction & Life cycle Snappers have separate sexes. Smaller species have a maximum lifespan of about 4 years and larger species live for more than 15 years.
  • CHECKLIST and BIOGEOGRAPHY of FISHES from GUADALUPE ISLAND, WESTERN MEXICO Héctor Reyes-Bonilla, Arturo Ayala-Bocos, Luis E

    CHECKLIST and BIOGEOGRAPHY of FISHES from GUADALUPE ISLAND, WESTERN MEXICO Héctor Reyes-Bonilla, Arturo Ayala-Bocos, Luis E

    ReyeS-BONIllA eT Al: CheCklIST AND BIOgeOgRAphy Of fISheS fROm gUADAlUpe ISlAND CalCOfI Rep., Vol. 51, 2010 CHECKLIST AND BIOGEOGRAPHY OF FISHES FROM GUADALUPE ISLAND, WESTERN MEXICO Héctor REyES-BONILLA, Arturo AyALA-BOCOS, LUIS E. Calderon-AGUILERA SAúL GONzáLEz-Romero, ISRAEL SáNCHEz-ALCántara Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada AND MARIANA Walther MENDOzA Carretera Tijuana - Ensenada # 3918, zona Playitas, C.P. 22860 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur Ensenada, B.C., México Departamento de Biología Marina Tel: +52 646 1750500, ext. 25257; Fax: +52 646 Apartado postal 19-B, CP 23080 [email protected] La Paz, B.C.S., México. Tel: (612) 123-8800, ext. 4160; Fax: (612) 123-8819 NADIA C. Olivares-BAñUELOS [email protected] Reserva de la Biosfera Isla Guadalupe Comisión Nacional de áreas Naturales Protegidas yULIANA R. BEDOLLA-GUzMáN AND Avenida del Puerto 375, local 30 Arturo RAMíREz-VALDEz Fraccionamiento Playas de Ensenada, C.P. 22880 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Ensenada, B.C., México Facultad de Ciencias Marinas, Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Carr. Tijuana-Ensenada km. 107, Apartado postal 453, C.P. 22890 Ensenada, B.C., México ABSTRACT recognized the biological and ecological significance of Guadalupe Island, off Baja California, México, is Guadalupe Island, and declared it a Biosphere Reserve an important fishing area which also harbors high (SEMARNAT 2005). marine biodiversity. Based on field data, literature Guadalupe Island is isolated, far away from the main- reviews, and scientific collection records, we pres- land and has limited logistic facilities to conduct scien- ent a comprehensive checklist of the local fish fauna, tific studies.
  • Perciformes: Epinephelidae)

    Perciformes: Epinephelidae)

    NOTE BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OCEANOGRAPHY, 57(2):145-147, 2009 FIRST RECORD OF PARTIAL MELANISM IN THE CONEY CEPHALOPHOLIS FULVA (PERCIFORMES: EPINEPHELIDAE) Thiony Simon 1; Jean-Christophe Joyeux 2 and Raphael Mariano Macieira 3 Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo Departamento de Oceanografia e Ecologia - Laboratório de Ictiologia (Av. Fernando Ferrari, 514, 29075-910 Vitória, ES, Brasil) [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Many abnormalities in the coloration of during sampling. None, however, presented any type fishes have been recorded, including albinism, of coloration abnormality. The frequency of melanism and ambicoloration (e.g . DAHLBERG, occurrence of the anomaly was therefore estimated to 1970). Melanism, according to Gould and Pyle (1896), be 0.68 %. The specimen was photographed still fresh is characterized by the presence of an excessive (Fig. 1a) and maintained frozen until fixation in 10 % amount of pigment in tissues and skin. In fishes, formaldehyde and preservation in 70 % ethanol. The melanism may occur in varying degrees of intensity area of the melanic part of the body was estimated (PIGG, 1998) and can, in some cases, result from from a digital photography of the right side of the fish injury (DAHLBERG, 1970), genetic inheritance (Fig. 1a). A 1300-square grid was digitally overlaid (HORTH, 2006), intergeneric hybridization (ELWIN, onto the photography to determine the proportion of 1957) or parasite infestation (HSIAO, 1941). squares over melanic skin. As both sides displayed the The coney Cephalopholis fulva (Linnaeus, some pattern and extent of melanosis, there was no 1758) is distributed in the Western Atlantic from need for measuring the area on the left side, and the South Carolina, USA, to Southeastern Brazil result obtained for the right side was extrapolated for (FIGUEIREDO; MENEZES, 1980).
  • Epinephelus Drummondhayi Goode and Bean, 1878 EED Frequent Synonyms / Misidentifications: None / None

    Epinephelus Drummondhayi Goode and Bean, 1878 EED Frequent Synonyms / Misidentifications: None / None

    click for previous page 1340 Bony Fishes Epinephelus drummondhayi Goode and Bean, 1878 EED Frequent synonyms / misidentifications: None / None. FAO names: En - Speckled hind; Fr - Mérou grivelé; Sp - Mero pintaroja. Diagnostic characters: Body depth subequal to head length, 2.4 to 2.6 times in standard length (for fish 20 to 43 cm standard length). Nostrils subequal; preopercle rounded, evenly serrate. Gill rakers on first arch 9 or 10 on upper limb, 17 or 18 on lower limb, total 26 to 28. Dorsal fin with 11 spines and 15 or 16 soft rays, the membrane incised between the anterior spines; anal fin with 3 spines and 9 soft rays; caudal fin trun- cate or slightly emarginate, the corners acute; pectoral-fin rays 18. Scales strongly ctenoid, about 125 lateral-scale series; lateral-line scales 72 to 76. Colour: adults (larger than 33 cm) dark reddish brown, densely covered with small pearly white spots; juveniles (less than 20 cm) bright yellow, covered with small bluish white spots. Size: Maximum about 110 cm; maximum weight 30 kg. Habitat, biology, and fisheries: Adults inhabit offshore rocky bottoms in depths of 25 to 183 m but are most common between 60 and 120 m.Females mature at 4 or 5 years of age (total length 45 to 60 cm).Spawning oc- curs from July to September, and a large female may produce up to 2 million eggs at 1 spawning. Back-calculated total lengths for fish aged 1 to 15 years are 19, 32, 41, 48, 53, 57, 61, 65, 68, 71, 74, 77, 81, 84, and 86 cm; the maximum age attained is at least 25 years, and the largest specimen measured was 110 cm.
  • Redalyc.Isopods (Isopoda: Aegidae, Cymothoidae, Gnathiidae)

    Redalyc.Isopods (Isopoda: Aegidae, Cymothoidae, Gnathiidae)

    Revista de Biología Tropical ISSN: 0034-7744 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica Bunkley-Williams, Lucy; Williams, Jr., Ernest H.; Bashirullah, Abul K.M. Isopods (Isopoda: Aegidae, Cymothoidae, Gnathiidae) associated with Venezuelan marine fishes (Elasmobranchii, Actinopterygii) Revista de Biología Tropical, vol. 54, núm. 3, diciembre, 2006, pp. 175-188 Universidad de Costa Rica San Pedro de Montes de Oca, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44920193024 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Isopods (Isopoda: Aegidae, Cymothoidae, Gnathiidae) associated with Venezuelan marine fishes (Elasmobranchii, Actinopterygii) Lucy Bunkley-Williams,1 Ernest H. Williams, Jr.2 & Abul K.M. Bashirullah3 1 Caribbean Aquatic Animal Health Project, Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, P.O. Box 9012, Mayagüez, PR 00861, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Marine Sciences, University of Puerto Rico, P.O. Box 908, Lajas, Puerto Rico 00667, USA; ewil- [email protected] 3 Instituto Oceanografico de Venezuela, Universidad de Oriente, Cumaná, Venezuela. Author for Correspondence: LBW, address as above. Telephone: 1 (787) 832-4040 x 3900 or 265-3837 (Administrative Office), x 3936, 3937 (Research Labs), x 3929 (Office); Fax: 1-787-834-3673; [email protected] Received 01-VI-2006. Corrected 02-X-2006. Accepted 13-X-2006. Abstract: The parasitic isopod fauna of fishes in the southern Caribbean is poorly known. In examinations of 12 639 specimens of 187 species of Venezuelan fishes, the authors found 10 species in three families of isopods (Gnathiids, Gnathia spp.
  • Type Species, Perca Rogaa Forsskål, 1775, by Original Designation and Monotypy; Proposed As a Subgenus

    Type Species, Perca Rogaa Forsskål, 1775, by Original Designation and Monotypy; Proposed As a Subgenus

    click for previous page 16 FAO Species Catalogue Vol. 16 2.4 Information by genus and species Aethaloperca Fowler, 1904 SERRAN Aethal Aethafoperca Fowler, 1904:522; type species, Perca rogaa Forsskål, 1775, by original designation and monotypy; proposed as a subgenus. Synonyms: None. Species: A single species widely distributed in the Red Sea and Indo-West Pacific region. Remarks: The genus Aethaloperca is closely related to Cephalopholis and Gracila which also have IX dorsal-fin spines and several trisegmental pterygiophores in the dorsal and anal fin. Smith-Vaniz et al. (1988) discussed the relationships of these genera, and we agree with their decision to recognize Aethaloperca as a valid genus. It differs from Cephalopholis and Gracila in the configuration of the pectoral and median fins and in some cranial features (the anteriorly converging parietal crests and the well-developed median crest on the frontals that extends to the rear edge of the ethmoidal depression). Aethaloperca also differs from Gracila in the shape of the maxilla and in having a larger head and deeper body. Aethaloperca rogaa (Forsskål, 1775) Fig. 35; PI. IA SERRAN Aethal 1 Perca rogaa Forsskål, 1775:38 (type locality: Red Sea, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia). Synonyms: Perca lunaris Forsskål; 1775:39 (type locality: Al Hudaydah [Yemen] and Jeddah). Cephalo- pholis rogaa . FAO Names: En - Redmouth grouper; Fr - Vielle roga; Sp - Cherna roga. Fig. 35 Aethaloperca rogaa (4.50 mm total length) Diagnosis: Body deep and compressed, the depth greater than the head length and contained 2.1 to 2.4 times in standard length, the body width contained 2.3 to 2.8 times in the depth.
  • Fishes from Complex a Offerings of Templo Mayor of Tenochtitlan (Mexico City, Mexico)

    Fishes from Complex a Offerings of Templo Mayor of Tenochtitlan (Mexico City, Mexico)

    Archaeofauna 27 (2018): 21-36 Fishes from Complex A offerings of Templo Mayor of Tenochtitlan (Mexico City, Mexico) ANA FABIOLA GUZMÁN Subdirección de laboratorios y Apoyo Académico, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Moneda 16, Col. Centro, Ciudad de México, CP 06060, México, e-mail: [email protected], and Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Prolongación de Carpio y Plan de Ayala, Ciudad de México, CP 11340, México. (Received 1 September 2016; Revised 25 January 2017; Accepted 10 February 2017) RESUMEN: El presente trabajo aborda los restos de peces encontrados en las once ofrendas que integran el Complejo A, depositadas alrededor del Templo Mayor de Tenochtitlán, el cual fuera el principal edificio ceremonial de la cultura mexica. El estudio de más de 35,000 restos muestra que se usaron 391 individuos de 63 especies y 35 familias. Siete especies fueron particularmen- te importantes por la cantidad de individuos y su frecuencia de uso, aunque el único atributo en común a las 11 ofrendas, es el pez sierra (Pristis). Sólo fueron ofrendados peces marinos, predominando las formas del Atlántico. La mayoría de los peces fueron depositados con una preparación taxidérmica para eliminar la columna vertebral. Las ofrendas colocadas en el relleno constructivo fueron marcadamente menos diversas respecto de las otras ofrendas colocadas en cistas. Aunque se pudieron relacionar algunas especies mencionadas por Sahagún con las ofren- dadas, las fuentes etnohistóricas proporcionan poca información de los peces y su uso, de ahí la importancia de un apropiado rescate y estudio de los restos de peces como fuente primaria y casi exclusiva de las relaciones entre el hombre mesoamericano y este recurso.
  • Fish Assemblages Associated with Red Grouper Pits at Pulley Ridge, A

    Fish Assemblages Associated with Red Grouper Pits at Pulley Ridge, A

    419 Abstract—Red grouper (Epineph- elus morio) modify their habitat by Fish assemblages associated with red grouper excavating sediment to expose rocky pits, providing structurally complex pits at Pulley Ridge, a mesophotic reef in the habitat for many fish species. Sur- Gulf of Mexico veys conducted with remotely op- erated vehicles from 2012 through 2015 were used to characterize fish Stacey L. Harter (contact author)1 assemblages associated with grouper Heather Moe1 pits at Pulley Ridge, a mesophotic 2 coral ecosystem and habitat area John K. Reed of particular concern in the Gulf Andrew W. David1 of Mexico, and to examine whether invasive species of lionfish (Pterois Email address for contact author: [email protected] spp.) have had an effect on these as- semblages. Overall, 208 grouper pits 1 Southeast Fisheries Science Center were examined, and 66 fish species National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA were associated with them. Fish as- 3500 Delwood Beach Road semblages were compared by using Panama City, Florida 32408 several factors but were considered 2 Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute to be significantly different only on Florida Atlantic University the basis of the presence or absence 5600 U.S. 1 North of predator species in their pit (no Fort Pierce, Florida 34946 predators, lionfish only, red grou- per only, or both lionfish and red grouper). The data do not indicate a negative effect from lionfish. Abun- dances of most species were higher in grouper pits that had lionfish, and species diversity was higher in grouper pits with a predator (lion- The red grouper (Epinephelus morio) waters (>70 m) of the shelf edge and fish, red grouper, or both).
  • Feeding Ecology of the Schoolmaster Snapper, <I>Lutjanus Apodus</I

    Feeding Ecology of the Schoolmaster Snapper, <I>Lutjanus Apodus</I

    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 56(3): 881-894, 1995 CORAL REEF PAPER FEEDING ECOLOGY OF THE SCHOOLMASTER SNAPPER, LUTJANUS APODUS (WALBAUM), FROM SOUTHWESTERN PUERTO RICO Jay R. Rooker ABSTRACT Stomach contents from 449 schoolmaster snapper, Lutjanus apodus, from southwestern Puerto Rico were examined. Hierarchical cluster analysis identified two primary trophic groups: ::;70 mm FL and >70 mm FL. Small L. apodus (::;70 mm) fed almost exclusive]y on crustaceans (89% by weight; 95% by numbcr; 98% frequency of occurrence), particularly amphipods and crabs, By contrast, L. apodus greater than 70 mm preferred piscine prey (57% by weight; 37% by number; 63% frequency of occurrence) and supplemented their diets with crabs, shrimp, and stomatopods, Ontogenetic patterns in diet were related to changes in jaw morphology (i.e., gape dimensions). Moreover, spatial and temporal variations were size- related and appeared to play some role in structuring the diet of L. apodus. Small L. apodus (::;70 mm) were found only in mangrove prop-root habitats and showed peak fecding at midday, Larger L. apodus (>70 mm) were present in both mangrove and coral reef habitats and showed ]ittle variation in diurnal feeding periodicity. Prey selection patterns of L. apodus were influenced by habitat and season. The schoolmaster snapper, Lutjanus apodus (Lutjanidae), is the most commonly encountered lutjanid on coral reefs in the Caribbean (Randall, 1983) and Bahamas (Bohlke and Chaplin, 1968). L. apodus appears confined to reefs more than other snappers (Randall, 1967); however, it has also been reported as the predominant lutjanid in areas adjacent to or inside mangrove prop-root habitats (Austin, 1971; Austin and Austin, 1971; Kimmel, 1985; Rooker and Dennis, 1991).