STATUS of SPC83 LEGISLATION As of 8/17/09 Spcs in Feet Published by NGS (46)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

STATUS OF SPC83 LEGISLATION as of 8/17/09 SPCs in feet published by NGS (46) U.S. Survey Ft 1 ft = 1200/3937 m 1 m = 3.2808333333 ft International Ft 1 ft = 0.3048 m 1 m = 3.2808398950 ft NAD 83 Foot State Legislation Conversion Legislation Alabama None None Alabama Statues, Title 35, Chapter 2, Section 35-2-1 to 35-2-9 Alaska Yes None Alaska Statutes, Title 38, Chapter 20, Sections 10-110 Arizona Yes International Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 33, Chapter 1, Article 3 Arkansas Yes U.S. Survey Arkansas Code Title 15, Subtitle 2, Chapter 21, Subchapter 3 California Yes U.S. Survey California Code, Public Resource Code, Division 8, Chapter 1: 8801-8819 Colorado Yes U.S. Survey Colorado Rev Statutes, Title 38Art 52, Sect 38-52-101 to 38-52-107 Connecticut Yes U.S. Survey Connecticut Statutes, Volume 4, Title 13a, Chapter 241, Section 13a-255 Delaware Yes U.S. Survey Delaware Code, Title 6, Chapter 55 Florida Yes U.S. Survey Florida State Statutes, Title XII, Chapter 177, Part I, section 177.151 Georgia Yes U.S. Survey Unannotated Georgia Code, Title 44, Chapter 4, Article 2 Section 20 to 31 Hawaii None None Idaho Yes U.S. Survey Idaho Statutes, Title 55, Chapter 17 Federal Register: October 5, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 193), Page 58804 Illinois Yes U.S. Survey Illinois Compiled Statutes, Chapter 765, ICLS225 Indiana Yes U.S. Survey Indiana Code, Title 32, Article 19-1 to 19-3 Iowa Yes U.S. Survey Iowa Code 2003, Chapter 355, Sections 16-19 Federal Register: October 5, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 193), Page 58805 Kansas Yes U.S. Survey Kansas Statute, Chapter 58, Part 6, Article 20a Federal Register: November 24, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 226), Page 67857 Kentucky Yes U.S. Survey Kentucky Revise Statutes, Chapter 001.02 Louisiana Yes U.S. Survey Louisiana Revised Statutes, Title 50, Chapter 1 Maine Yes U.S. Survey Maine Revised Statutes, Title 33, Chapter 13, §801 to §807-A Federal Register: December 12, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 238), Page 70575 Maryland Yes U.S. Survey Maryland Code, Real Property, Title 14 Miscellaneous Rules, Subtitle 4, § 14-401 Massachusetts Yes U.S. Survey General Laws of Massachusetts, Part 1, Title XV,Chapter 97, Section 8-17 Michigan Yes International Michigan Complied Laws, Public Act 9 of 1964, Sections 54.231-.239, Minnesota Yes U.S. Survey Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 505.18 to 505.28 Federal Register: June 12, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 112), Page 32287 Mississippi Yes U.S. Survey Mississippi Code of 1972, Title 89 Chapter 6 Missouri Yes None Missouri Revised Statutes, Title I, Chapter 60, Section 60-451 Montana Yes International Montana Code Annotated, Title 70, Chapter 22, Part 2 Nebraska Yes U.S. Survey Nebraska Statutes 76-2501 to 76-2506 Federal Register: December 28, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 248), Page 73771 Nevada Yes U.S. Survey Nevada Revised Statutes, Chapter 327.005 to 327.090 Federal Register: July 28, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 145), Page 42817 New Hampshire Yes U.S. Survey New Hampshire Revised Statutes, Title 1, Chapter 1-A New Jersey Yes U.S. Survey New Jersey Permanent Statute, Title 51, Section 3-7 to 3-10 Federal Register: July 28, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 145), Page 42816-42817 New Mexico Yes U.S. Survey New Mexico Statutes, Chapter 47, Article 1, Section 49 New York Yes U.S. Survey Laws of New York, Chapter 605 North Carolina Yes U.S. Survey North Carolina State Statutes, Chapter 102 North Dakota Yes International North Dakota Century Code, Title 47, 47-20.2 Ohio Yes U.S. Survey Ohio Revised Code, Title 1, Chapter 157 Federal Register: March 5, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 42), Page 9737 Oklahoma Yes U.S. Survey Oklahoma Statutes, Title 60, §60-1001 to §60-1009 Oregon Yes International Oregon Revised Statutes, Volume 3, Chapter 93.320 to 93.380 Pennsylvania Yes U.S. Survey Pennsylvania Statutes, Title 68, Chapter 21 P.S. § 951 - 958 Rhode Island Yes U.S. Survey Rhode Island General Laws, Title 34, Chapter 34-8 South Carolina Yes International South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 27, Chapter 2, Section 27-2-10 to 27-2-110 South Dakota Yes U.S. Survey South Dakota Codified Laws Title 43, Chapter 22 Tennessee Yes U.S. Survey Tennessee Code, Title 66, Chapter 6 Texas Yes U.S. Survey Texas Statutes, Natural Resources Code, Title 2, Chapter 21, Section 21.071 to 21.079 Utah Yes U.S. Survey Utah Code, Title 57, Chapter 10 Federal Register: July 16, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 47), Pages 34557-34558 Vermont Yes U.S. Survey Vermont Statutes, Title 01, Chapter 17 § 671- 679 Virginia Yes U.S. Survey Code of Virginia, Title 55 Property and Conveyances, Chapter 17, 55-287 to 55-297 Washington Yes U.S. Survey Revised Code of Washington, Title 58, Chapter 20, Section 110 to 901 West Virginia Yes U.S. Survey West Virginia Code, Chapter 30-13 A-27 Federal Register: August 17, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 159), Page 46214 Wisconsin Yes U.S. Survey Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 236, Subchapter 3, 236.18 Wyoming Yes U.S. Survey Wyoming Statutes, Title 34, Chapter 25 Federal Register: March 5, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 42), Page 9737-9738 Federal Register Notice Published American Samoa None None Guam Yes None Guam Code Annotated, Title 21, Division 2, Chapter 60, Article 5, 60501-60519 Northern Marianas None None Puerto Rico Yes None Law 264 Virgin Islands None None NAVD 88 State Legislation Legislation Alabama None Alaska None Arizona None Arkansas None California Yes California Code, Public Resource Code, Division 8, Chapter 1: 8853 Colorado None Connecticut None Delaware None Florida None Georgia None Hawaii None Idaho None Illinois None Indiana None Iowa None Kansas None Kentucky None Louisiana None Maine None Maryland None Massachusetts None Michigan None Minnesota None Mississippi None Missouri None Montana None Nebraska None Nevada None New Hampshire None New Jersey None New Mexico None New York None North Carolina None North Dakota None Ohio None Oklahoma None Oregon None Pennsylvania None Rhode Island None South Carolina None South Dakota None Tennessee None Texas None Utah None Vermont None Virginia None Washington None West Virginia None Wisconsin None Wyoming None American Samoa Yes Federal Register: January 29, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 13), Page 3991 Guam Yes Federal Register: January 29, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 13), Page 3990 Northern Marianas Yes Federal Register: January 29, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 13), Page 3990-3991 Puerto Rico None Virgin Islands None.
Recommended publications
  • Statutory Rape: a Guide to State Laws and Reporting Requirements

    Statutory Rape: a Guide to State Laws and Reporting Requirements

    Statutory Rape: A Guide to State Laws and Reporting Requirements Prepared for: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Department of Health and Human Services Prepared by: Asaph Glosser Karen Gardiner Mike Fishman The Lewin Group December 15, 2004 Acknowledgements Work on this project was funded by the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under a contract to The Lewin Group. This report benefited greatly from the oversight and input of Jerry Silverman, the ASPE Project Officer. In addition, we would like to acknowledge the assistance of a number of reviewers. Sarah Brown, Eva Klain, and Brenda Rhodes Miller provided us with valuable guidance and insights into legal issues and the policy implications of the laws and reporting requirements. Their comments improved both the content and the organization of the paper. At The Lewin Group, Shauna Brodsky reviewed drafts and provided helpful comments. The Authors Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................ES-1 A. Background...........................................................................................................................ES-1 1. Criminal Laws............................................................................................................... ES-1 2. Reporting Requirements.............................................................................................
  • Code Revision Commission

    Code Revision Commission

    Sen.R. Michael Young Sen. James Tomes Sen. James Arnold Sen. Greg Taylor Rep. Greg Steuerwald Rep. Thomas Washburne Rep. Charles Moseley Rep. Cherrish Pryor Gary Miller • Gretchen Gutman Mike McMahon Hon.Ma~retG.Robb CODE REVISION COMMISSION Jerry Bonnet Matt Light Legislative Services Agency 200 West Washington Street, Suite 301 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2789 Tel: (317) 233-0696 Fax: (317) 232-2554 John Stief(, Attorney for the Commission Authority: IC 2-5-1.1-10 MEETING MINUTES1 Meeting Date: October 15, 2013 Meeting Time: 1:30 P.M. Meeting Place: State House, 200 W. Washington St., Room 233 Meeting City: Indianapolis, Indiana· Meeting Number: 2 Members Present: Sen. R. Michael Young; Sen. James Tomes; Rep. Greg Steuerwald; Rep. Thomas Washburne; Rep. Charles Moseley; Rep. Cherrish Pryor; Gretchen Gutman; Mike McMahon; Hon. John G. Baker; Jerry Bonnet; Matt Light. Members Absent: Sen. James Arnold; Sen. Greg Taylor; Gary Miller. Staff Present: Mr. John Stieff, Director, Office of Code Revision, Legislative Services Agency; Mr. Craig Mortell, Attorney, Office of Bill Drafting and Research; Mr. John Kline, Attorney, Office of Code Revision; Ms. Stephanie Lawyer, Attorney, Office of Code Revision. 1 These minutes, exhibits, and other materials referenced in the minutes can be viewed electronically at http://www.in.gov/legislative Hard copies can be obtained in the Legislative Information Center in Room 230 ofthe State House in Indianapolis, Indiana. Requests for hard copies may be mailed to the Legislative Information Center, Legislative Services Agency, West Washington Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204-2789. A fee of$0.15 per page and mailing costs will be charged for hard copies.
  • Indiana Law Review

    Indiana Law Review

    Indiana Law Review Volume 44 2010 Number 1 NOTE S EXTING: A RESPONSE TO PROSECUTING THOSE GROWING UP WITH A GROWING TREND J ORDAN J. SZYMIALIS* INTRODUCTION Hope liked a boy and sent him a photo showing her breasts.1 The photo eventually made its way around Hope’s entire school.2 The school suspended Hope, and she returned to school to face a barrage of insults as students called her a “‘whore’ and [a] ‘slut.’”3 Three months later, Hope’s mother found her daughter dead, all of thirteen years old, after “Hope [hung] herself in her bedroom.”4 Like Hope’s tragic story, the debate over how to respond to “sexting” has headlined news outlets over the past several years.5 A minor creates a “sext” message by “tak[ing] a picture of him- or herself with a digital camera or cell phone camera, or ask[ing] someone else to take that picture.”6 In a high school class of one hundred students, perhaps as many as twenty of these students will have sent sexually explicit images to each other by cell phone.7 Prosecutors * J.D.-M.B.A. Candidate, 2011, Indiana University School of Law—Indianapolis; B.A., 2007, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana. I would like to express immense gratitude to Professor Joel M. Schumm, Hattie Harman, and Danielle Tucker, as well as the other editors of the Indiana Law Review whose suggestions and edits made this Note possible. Finally, I want to thank my family, friends, and especially Cindy, for their enduring patience and feedback throughout the development of this Note.
  • State-By-State Report on Authentication of Online Legal Resources

    State-By-State Report on Authentication of Online Legal Resources

    2009-10 UPDATES TO THE STATE-BY-STATE REPORT ON AUTHENTICATION OF ONLINE LEGAL RESOURCES AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF LAW LIBRARIES ELECTRONIC LEGAL INFORMATION ACCESS & CITATION COMMITTEE February 2010 Editor Tina S. Ching, Seattle University School of Law Authors Steven Anderson, Maryland State Law Library (Maryland) John R. Barden, Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library (Maine) Cathryn Bowie, State of Oregon Law Library (Oregon) Anne Burnett, Alexander Campbell King Law Library, University of Georgia School of Law (Georgia) A. Hays Butler, Rutgers Law School – Camden (New Jersey and Pennsylvania) Kathy Carlson, Wyoming State Law Library (Wyoming) Timothy L. Coggins, 2009-2010 Vice-Chair of the Electronic Legal Information Access and Citation Committee University of Richmond School of Law Library (Alabama, Arkansas and Vermont) Jane Colwin, Wisconsin State Law Library (Wisconsin) Terrye Conroy, Coleman Karesh Law Library University of South Carolina School of Law (South Carolina) Daniel Cordova, Colorado Supreme Court Library (Colorado) Jane Edwards, Michigan State University College of Law, and Ruth S. Stevens, Grand Valley State University (Michigan) Cynthia L. Ernst, Leon E. Bloch Law Library, University of Missouri – Kansas City (Missouri) Robert M. Ey, WolfBlock, LLP (Massachusetts) Janet Fisher and Tony Bucci, Arizona State Library, Archives and Public Records (Arizona) Jenny R.F. Fujinaka, Hawai‘i Supreme Court Law Library (Hawaii) STATE-BY-STATE REPORT ON AUTHENTICATION OF ONLINE LEGAL RESOURCES 2009-10 UPDATE AUTHORS Barbara L. Golden, Minnesota State Law Library (Minnesota) Michael Greenlee, University of Idaho Law Library (Idaho) Kathleen Harrington, Nevada Supreme Court Library (Nevada) Stephanie P. Hess, Nova Southeastern Law School (Florida) Sarah G.
  • Summary of State Speed Laws

    Summary of State Speed Laws

    DOT HS 810 826 August 2007 Summary of State Speed Laws Tenth Edition Current as of January 1, 2007 This document is available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161 This publication is distributed by the U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, in the interest of information exchange. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Department of Transportation or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. If trade or manufacturers' names or products are mentioned, it is because they are considered essential to the object of the publication and should not be construed as an endorsement. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...................................................iii Missouri ......................................................138 Alabama..........................................................1 Montana ......................................................143 Alaska.............................................................5 Nebraska .....................................................150 Arizona ...........................................................9 Nevada ........................................................157 Arkansas .......................................................15 New
  • City of Elwood, Indiana Code of Ordinances

    City of Elwood, Indiana Code of Ordinances

    CITY OF ELWOOD, INDIANA CODE OF ORDINANCES Contains 2018 S-9 Supplement, current through: Ordinance 2308, passed 8-6-18 and 2018 Advance Legislative Service Pamphlet No. 5 Published by: AMERICAN LEGAL PUBLISHING CORPORATION One West Fourth Street h 3rd Floor h Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 1-800-445-5588 h www.amlegal.com ELWOOD, INDIANA CODE OF ORDINANCES TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter TITLE I: GENERAL PROVISIONS 10. General Provisions TITLE III: ADMINISTRATION 30. Governmental Organization 31. City Officials 32. Common Council 33. Authorities, Boards, Commissions and Departments 34. City Court 35. Finance, Taxation and Funds 36. Personnel 37. City Policies TITLE V: PUBLIC WORKS 50. Garbage 51. Water 52. Sewers 53. Industrial Waste TITLE VII: TRAFFIC CODE 70. General Regulations 71. Traffic Rules 72. Parking 73. Recreational Vehicles 74. Traffic Schedules 75. Parking Schedules 76. Alternative Transportation 2009 S-5 1 2 Elwood - Table of Contents TITLE IX: GENERAL REGULATIONS 90. Abandoned Vehicles 91. Animals 92. Fair Housing 93. Fire Regulations 94. Nuisances 95. Parks 96. Streets and Sidewalks TITLE XI: BUSINESS REGULATIONS 110. Sexually Oriented Businesses 111. Amusements 112. Cable Television 113. Residential Sales 114. Peddlers, Itinerant Merchants, and Solicitors TITLE XIII: GENERAL OFFENSES 130. General Offenses TITLE XV: LAND USAGE 150. Building Regulations 151. Flood Hazard Prevention 152. Subdivisions 153. Zoning 154. Historic Buildings 155. Rental Registration Program 156. Abandoned Structure Monitoring Program TABLE OF SPECIAL ORDINANCES Table I. Franchise Agreements II. Street Closings 2018 S-9 Table of Contents 3 PARALLEL REFERENCES References to Indiana Code References to 1966 Code References to Ordinances INDEX 4 Elwood - Table of Contents PARALLEL REFERENCES References to Indiana Code References to 1966 Code References to Ordinances 1 2 Elwood - Parallel References REFERENCES TO INDIANA CODE I.C.
  • Summary of Vehicle Occupant Protection Laws Ninth Edition Current As of June 1, 2010 DISCLAIMER

    DOT HS 811 458 April 2011 Summary of Vehicle Occupant Protection Laws Ninth Edition Current as of June 1, 2010 DISCLAIMER This publication is distributed by the U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, in the interest of information exchange. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department of Transportation or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. If trade names, manufacturers’names, or specific products are mentioned, it is because they are considered essential to the object of the publication and should not be construed as an endorsement. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………. iii OVERVIEW NARRATIVE OF KEY PROVISIONS………………………………………….. v SUMMARY CHART OF KEY PROVISIONS…………………………………………………. vi ALABAMA……………………………………………………………………………………… 1 ALASKA………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 ARIZONA……………………………………………………………………………………….. 8 ARKANSAS…………………………………………………………………………………….. 11 CALIFORNIA…………………………………………………………………………………… 14 COLORADO…………………………………………………………………………………….. 19 CONNECTICUT………………………………………………………………………………… 22 DELAWARE…………………………………………………………………………………….. 26 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA…………………………………………………………………….. 29 FLORIDA………………………………………………………………………………………… 33 GEORGIA……………………………………………………………………………………….. 37 HAWAI’I…………………………………………………………………………………………
  • The Laws of Indiana and Wisconsin

    The Laws of Indiana and Wisconsin

    Chapter 7 Researching outside of Illinois: The Laws of Indiana and Wisconsin Heidi Frostestad Kuehl Foreign, Comparative, and International Law Librarian and Coordinator of Educational Programming and Outreach Pritzker Legal Research Center Northwestern University School of Law Beginning State-Specific Legal Research in Indiana or Wisconsin The first step of any type of legal research is finding background materials and sources for jurisdictional legal research. Legal researchers rely upon secondary sources, such as legal encyclopedias, American Law Reports, treatises, nutshells, or other types of books about legal topics, to begin their research in topics of the law or particular jurisdictions of law. Like with topical research or Federal research, it is wise to begin State law research with a legal encyclopedia (if the State has one) to decipher the terminology of particular State law research topics and collect citations to primary law that are found in the footnotes of a secondary source. For a national scope and treatment of States, researchers may choose to consult one or both of the two prominent legal encyclopedias: American Jurisprudence 2d (Am.Jur.2d) or Corpus Juris Secundum (C.J.S.). Both of these national legal encyclopedias are available in print in most academic law libraries or court libraries or are also available online on Westlaw/WestlawNext. In addition to national legal encyclopedias, there are also State-specific legal encyclopedias that provide great overviews and analysis for State-specific legal topics. For the laws of Indiana, researchers rely on West’s Indiana Law Encyclopedia to begin topical areas of legal research. In Wisconsin, legal researchers begin their research in other types of secondary sources, such as the Wisconsin Practice series or one of the national legal encyclopedias (Am.Jur.2d or C.J.S.), because there is not a State-specific legal encyclopedia.
  • Chart of State Nonprofit Registration and Solicitation Requirements Resources

    Chart of State Nonprofit Registration and Solicitation Requirements Resources

    Chart of State Nonprofit Registration and Solicitation Requirements Resources State Governing Law Website www.ago.state.al.us/File-Consumer-Alabama-Charitable-Solicitation-Act Alabama Alabama Code Sec. 13A-9-70 through 84 www.ago.state.al.us/File-Consumer-Alabama-Charitable-Code 9 AAC 12.010-9. AAC 12.900; AS 45.68.010 - AS Alaska 45.68.900 www.commerce.state.ak.us/occ/home.htm www.azag.gov/consumer/charitable.html Arizona A.R.S. Sec. 44-6551, 44-6554, 44-6555 www.azsos.gov/business_services/Charities/Default.htm Arkansas Arkansas Code Ann. Sec. 4-28-401 or SB 156 www.arkleg.state.ar.us/SearchCenter/Pages/arkansascode.aspx Cal. Corp. Code Sec. 17510-17510.95; Cal. Govt www.ag.ca.gov/charities Codes Sec. 12580-12599.7; Cal. Code of California Regulations, Title 11 Sec. 300-310, 991.1-999.4 www.ag.ca.gov/charities/statutes.php Co. Charitable Solicitations Act, Title 6, Article 16, Colorado C.R.S.; Colorado Revised Statutes 6-16-110.5(3), www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/charities/charitable.htm www.ct.gov/ag/cwp/browse.asp?a=2074&agNav=| Summary of Charitable Funds Solicitation Act; Connecticut C.G.S Sec. 21A-175 www.ct.gov/ag/lib/ag/charities/public_charity_revisedgenl_info_cscfa_(2).doc Delaware Delaware Code Title 8: Corporations www.delcode.delaware.gov/title8/index.shtml District of Columbia D.C.Code Sec. 5, Title 29, Ch. 8 www.brc.dc.gov/licenses/dccode.asp Florida Florida Statutes Title XXXVI, Ch. 617 www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm www.sos.state.ga.us/securities/default.htm www.law.justia.com/georgia/codes/ O.C.G.A.
  • INDIANA LAW UPDATE by Ronald J. Waicukauski and Brad A. Catlin ISSUE 2: 2017 SERIES – March 30, 2017 Available Online At

    INDIANA LAW UPDATE by Ronald J. Waicukauski and Brad A. Catlin ISSUE 2: 2017 SERIES – March 30, 2017 Available Online At

    INDIANA LAW UPDATE by Ronald J. Waicukauski and Brad A. Catlin ISSUE 2: 2017 SERIES – March 30, 2017 Available online at: www.IndianaLawUpdate.com 301 Massachusetts Avenue Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 T: 317-633-8787 [email protected] [email protected] IN THE NEWS: Legal advertising blows past $1 billion and goes viral .................... 2 1. The Governor and Public Records; Groth v. Pence, 67 N.E.3d 1104 (Ind. Ct. App. 1/9/17) (Najam) .............................................................................................. 3 2. Personal Jurisdiction of BMV Depends on Service on Attorney General; Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles v. Watson, 70 N.E.3d 380 (Ind. Ct. App. 1/23/17) (Robb) ....................................................................................................... 5 3. 180-Day Extension for Med Mal Claims Strictly Applied; Dermatology Associates, P.C. v. White, 67 N.E.3d 1173 (Ind. Ct. App. 1/19/17) (Robb) ........... 6 4. No Constructive Fraud Without Concealment; Central Indiana Podiatry, P.C. v. Barnes & Thornburg, LLP, 2017 WL 819741 (Ind. Ct. App. 11/16/16) (May) . 9 5. A Voidable Error Will Not Satisfy Tr. R. 60(B)(6) Requirements for Relief from Judgment; Koonce v. Finney, 68 N.E.3d 1086 (Ind. Ct. App. 1/13/17 (May) ..... 11 6. Failing To Follow Proper Rule 60(B) Procedure Results In Dismissal Of Motion; Falatovics v. Falatovics, 2017 WL 943970 (Ind. Ct. App. 3/10/17) (Crone) .................................................................................................................. 13 7. Law Firms Must Comply With Credit Services Organizations Act; Consumer Attorney Services, P.A. v. State of Indiana, 2017 WL 1057413 (Ind. 3/21/17) (Massa) ................................................................................................................. 15 8. Person Who May Have Exerted Undue Influence Always Has The Burden Of Proof; Garrison v.
  • Uniform Electronic Legal Material Act – Enactments June 2019

    Uniform Electronic Legal Material Act – Enactments June 2019

    UNIFORM ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL ACT – ENACTMENTS JUNE 2019 STATE BILL NUMBER COVERED LEGAL MATERIALS FISCAL IMPACT ENACTED EFFECTIVE • Constitution of Arizona Arizona • Arizona session laws No fiscal impact SB 1414 5/17/2016 8/8/2016 • Arizona Revised Statutes $135,000 to $165,000 (General Fund) for set up, authentication, • California Constitution archiving, and onsite storage. California SB 1075 • California Statutes 9/13/2012 7/1/2015 • California Codes Annual ongoing costs in the range of $40,000 to $70,000. • Colorado Constitution • Session Laws of Colorado $198,912 4/26/2012 3/31/2014 Colorado HB 1209 • Colorado Revised Statutes • State agency rules with effect of law • Constitution of Connecticut • General Statutes of Connecticut Connecticut SB 235 • Regulations of Connecticut state agencies No fiscal impact 5/17/2013 10/1/2014 • Reported decisions of Connecticut Supreme Court, Connecticut Appellate Court, and Connecticut Superior Court • Constitution of Delaware • Delaware Laws of Delaware No fiscal impact HB 403 • Delaware Code 7/23/2014 10/21/2014 • Regulations published in the Delaware Administrative Code • Hawaii Constitution • Hawaii Session Laws • Hawaii Revised Statutes Hawaii • State agency rules with effect of law No fiscal impact SB 32 / HB 18 • Reported decisions of Supreme Court of 4/16/2013 7/1/2013 State of Hawaii and Intermediate Appellate Court of Hawaii • State court rules • Idaho Constitution • Idaho Session Laws • Idaho Code Idaho • Idaho Administrative Code and Administrative No fiscal impact S1356 Bulletin
  • Survey of Federal & State Laws

    Survey of Federal & State Laws

    Survey of Federal & State Laws: Understanding Your Right To Be Treated Fairly and Without Discriminaon in Restaurants, Stores, and Other Businesses PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION LAWS BASED ON RACE, COLOR, AND/OR NATIONAL ORIGIN Last Updated : September 20, 2020 ** This survey is provided solely for informaonal purposes. Stop AAPI Hate does not warrant the accuracy of the informaon contained herein. Users are encouraged to seek advice from a licensed aorney regarding potenal violaons of any applicable public accommodaon laws. ** CAVEATS (1) This survey reviews general public accommodaon statutes under federal law and the laws of the states and District of Columbia. A review of case law interpreng the scope and applicaon of these statutes as well as a review of other statutes that may provide general an-discriminaon protecons or other indirect legal protecons are beyond the scope of this survey. (2) The scope of public accommodaon statutes differ from jurisdicon to jurisdicon based on differences in how key terms are statutorily defined and the existence of different statutory exempons to the statutes. (3) Addional public accommodaon laws may exist at the local (sub-federal/state) level. A comprehensive survey of which localies have enacted such laws is beyond the scope of this survey. However, in jurisdicons where no statewide public accommodaon laws for individuals based on race, color, or naonal origin exist, an aempt has been made to determine whether local public accommodaon laws exist in major urban centers in those jurisdicons. 1 (4) To the extent this survey indicates no private right of acon exists, that merely indicates no private right of acon is expressly authorized by that jurisdicon’s general public accommodaon statute.