DOCSLIB.ORG

The Reparations Agreement with Germany General Debate and Decision Knesset Sessions 38-401, 7-9.1.1952

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Reparations Agreement with Germany General Debate and Decision Knesset Sessions 38-401, 7-9.1.1952 161 [18] The Reparations Agreement with Germany General Debate and Decision Knesset Sessions 38-401, 7-9.1.1952 Speaker Yosef Sprinzak: The prime minister has the floor. Prime Minister David Ben Gurion: Mr. Speaker, Members of the Knesset, as members of the first Knesset will recall, on January 6, 1951 the government of Israel submitted a note to the governments of the United States, the USSR, Britain and France regarding payment of compensation and restitution of plundered property to Jews by Germany. The note mentioned the payment and restitution owing to individuals and noted that meeting all these personal claims in no way concludes the German people’s grave obligation vis-à-vis the Jewish people for the plunder of the property and confiscation of assets of Jews throughout Europe, those Jews who were slaughtered without leaving heirs. Accordingly, on March 12, 1951 the government submitted a second note to the four allied powers. From a formal standpoint this claim is unprecedented in the annals of international relations. In the note the government of Israel demanded that reparations amounting to $1.5 billion be imposed upon Germany, both West and East, this sum covering only part of the plundered Jewish property. This claim was submitted out of the conviction that the entire German people, residing in West Germany and East Germany alike, were equally responsible for the killing and plunder perpetrated against the Jewish people in Europe. In the note the government made it clear that this responsibility was imposed upon both sectors of present day Germany. It also noted that the State of Israel, in its capacity as the sovereign embodiment of the Jewish people, was both entitled and duty-bound to demand satisfaction for the rights and property of the millions of victims, who were slaughtered and burnt in crematoria and gas chambers while 1 The debate, in which 30 out of the 120 Knesset members participated, lasted for three days. DOI 10.1515/9783110255386.161, , published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License. 162 Knesset, 7.1.1952 their property was confiscated, stolen and plundered only because they belonged to the Jewish people. Determining the reparations was based upon two basic assumptions: a. Our duty to restore, to the greatest possible extent, the plundered property of Jews without heirs, and to take it from the murderers and those who came after them, in East Germany and West Germany alike, so that the murderer will not also take possession. b. Our obligation, aided by Jewish communities throughout the world, to assimilate Holocaust survivors and absorb them in Israel and to utilize the restored property for this purpose. The note stated that this claim is unprecedented since during the Holocaust the State of Israel did not exist and did not fight with its own army against Nazi Germany, although thousands of its sons and daughters volunteered for Jewish units in the framework of the British Army, first and foremost in the battalions of the Jewish Brigade which took part in defeating the Hitler regime. It was also noted that there is no precedent for the acts of slaughter and plunder of such tremendous magnitude perpetrated against the Jews of Europe by the German people under Hitler’s rule. More than six million Jews were put to death by torture, starvation, killing, and mass asphyxiation. Many were burnt and buried alive. No mercy was shown to the aged, women and children. Babies were torn from their mothers’ arms and cast into the furnaces. Before the mass and systematic murder and during and after it, came the plunder which was also of vast, unprecedented scope. According to the most conservative estimate, during the period of Hitler’s rule the Germans plundered Jewish property in Germany and the Nazi-occupied countries valued at some $6 billion. There are some estimates that reach even larger figures. A crime of such magnitude cannot be forgiven by means of any material compensation. Any compensation whatsoever, great as it may be, cannot be commensurate with the loss of human life or forgive the suffering and anguish of men and women, children, the elderly and infants. Yet the German people, even after the defeat of Hitler’s regime, continue to enjoy, in the West and East alike, the fruits of the slaughter and the looting, the robbery and the plunder of the murdered Jews. The government of Israel views itself as duty-bound to demand that the German people restore the plundered Jewish property; on the one hand, to restore that property of the surviving claimants and heirs, and on the other to restore the vast property that has no heirs to the State of Israel – committed to welfare of the Holocaust survivors and which so far has absorbed the vast majority of them. Even before the establishment of the state, the Yishuv of Palestine played a decisive role in the absorption of German refugees who started to arrive following the outbreak of Nazi persecution in 1933. During the war the soldiers of the Knesset, 7.1.1952 163 Jewish Brigade were the first to encounter the survivors in the detention and death camps in Germany and Central European countries, and to raise their spirits by bringing them the message of our resourceful and fighting homeland.2 Upon its establishment, the State of Israel opened its gates to all displaced persons and survivors of the countries in which the killing took place, and in the last two or three years, hundreds of thousands of survivors have reached a safe haven in independent Israel. The majority of the survivors brought only their lives to Israel, for all their property had been plundered. A tremendous task has been imposed upon the government of Israel, a task which is also unprecedented in contemporary history and perhaps even throughout past generations: the rapid absorption of hundreds of thousands of immigrants who came with only the clothes on their backs into a young, poor country under Arab siege. The burden that this mass, impoverished immigration has imposed upon the state is beyond its capabilities and the Jews of the free world have assumed their duty to participate in this vast enterprise. Nevertheless, the burden upon the state is still great. Thus, not only does it have a moral right – even though this right has no formal precedent in the annals of international relations – but also a sacred duty to do everything within its power to restore at least a great part of the plunder to its rightful owners, so that the Nazi murderers’ heirs in West and East Germany would not also become the heirs of the murdered Jews. The government of Israel specified the sum of $1.5 billion as its claim from both sectors of Germany – although the plundered property’s value was several times higher according to authoritative, expert estimates – because it is the minimal sum required for the absorption of half a million immigrants from countries that were under Nazi rule. Payment of these reparations to the State of Israel does not absolve the German governments in the West and East from the responsibility imposed upon them to pay everything due for their plundered property to individual Jews living here with us or to their legitimate heirs. These reparations will be claimed by the representatives of world Jewry. As I mentioned, the note was sent to the four occupying powers: The United States, the Soviet Union, Britain and France, and the claim was directed at both parts of present-day Germany, West and East. So far we have received no response from the Soviet Union, and the same goes for East Germany. We have received an official reply from the other three powers in almost identical wording. The replies were sent on July 5, 1951, some four months after the note was submitted. In its note to Israel’s ambassador in Washington, the American administration writes that the government of Israel is surely aware that the despicable crime against humanity perpetrated by the Nazi regime in the planned extermination and plundering of the Jews of Europe has appalled the American people and its government. The government of Israel must surely also be aware that from the 2 See document no. 7, note no. 3, on the Jewish Brigade. 164 Knesset, 7.1.1952 beginning of the conquest of Germany, it has been the American administration’s firm policy to bring to justice all those responsible for the planning and implementation of the crime and to rectify, as far as possible, the wrongdoing committed against the victims of Nazi persecution. The note goes on to say that the United States government gave shelter to thousands of Jewish refugees who fled Nazi persecution during the war, and at the end of the war it enacted special laws in order to open its gates to many of those who survived, penniless and bereft, because of the war and Nazi oppression. Together with Britain and France, it also made substantial contributions to refugee organizations and for refugees who had settled in Israel through the International Refugee Organization [IRO]. Although the Jewish victims of the Nazis, the American government adds, were not represented at the Paris Compensation Conference, a sum of $25 million confiscated from German deposits in neutral countries was allocated to the rehabilitation of Nazi victims, and it was then acknowledged that the majority of those victims were Jews; thus it was decided that 90 percent of that sum and also all the unclaimed property of Jewish victims in those countries would be earmarked for the benefit of the Jewish victims.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jews on Route to Palestine 1934-1944. Sketches from the History of Aliyah
    JEWS ON ROUTE TO PALESTINE 1934−1944 JAGIELLONIAN STUDIES IN HISTORY Editor in chief Jan Jacek Bruski Vol. 1 Artur Patek JEWS ON ROUTE TO PALESTINE 1934−1944 Sketches from the History of Aliyah Bet – Clandestine Jewish Immigration Jagiellonian University Press Th e publication of this volume was fi nanced by the Jagiellonian University in Krakow – Faculty of History REVIEWER Prof. Tomasz Gąsowski SERIES COVER LAYOUT Jan Jacek Bruski COVER DESIGN Agnieszka Winciorek Cover photography: Departure of Jews from Warsaw to Palestine, Railway Station, Warsaw 1937 [Courtesy of National Digital Archives (Narodowe Archiwum Cyfrowe) in Warsaw] Th is volume is an English version of a book originally published in Polish by the Avalon, publishing house in Krakow (Żydzi w drodze do Palestyny 1934–1944. Szkice z dziejów alji bet, nielegalnej imigracji żydowskiej, Krakow 2009) Translated from the Polish by Guy Russel Torr and Timothy Williams © Copyright by Artur Patek & Jagiellonian University Press First edition, Krakow 2012 All rights reserved No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any eletronic, mechanical, or other means, now know or hereaft er invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers ISBN 978-83-233-3390-6 ISSN 2299-758X www.wuj.pl Jagiellonian University Press Editorial Offi ces: Michałowskiego St. 9/2, 31-126 Krakow Phone: +48 12 631 18 81, +48 12 631 18 82, Fax: +48 12 631 18 83 Distribution: Phone: +48 12 631 01 97, Fax: +48 12 631 01 98 Cell Phone: + 48 506 006 674, e-mail: [email protected] Bank: PEKAO SA, IBAN PL80 1240 4722 1111 0000 4856 3325 Contents Th e most important abbreviations and acronyms ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Intentions of Right-Wing Extremists in Germany
    IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Intentions of Right-wing Extremists in Germany Weiss, Alex 5/7/2011 Since the fall of the Nazi regime, Germany has undergone extreme changes socially, economically, and politically. Almost immediately after the Second World War, it became illegal, or at least socially unacceptable, for Germans to promote the Nazi party or any of its ideologies. A strong international presence from the allies effectively suppressed the patriotic and nationalistic views formerly present in Germany after the allied occupation. The suppression of such beliefs has not eradicated them from contemporary Germany, and increasing numbers of primarily young males now identify themselves as neo-Nazis (1). This group of neo-Nazis hold many of the same beliefs as the Nazi party from the 1930’s and 40’s, which some may argue is a cause for concern. This essay will identify the intentions of right-wing extremists in contemporary Germany, and address how they might fit into Germany’s future. In order to fully analyze the intentions of right-wing extremists today, it is critical to know where and how these beliefs came about. Many of the practices and ideologies of the former Nazi party are held today amongst contemporary extreme-right groups, often referred to as Neo-Nazis. A few of the behaviors of the Neo-Nazis that have been preserved from the former Nazi party are anti-Semitism, xenophobia and violence towards “non-Germans”, and ultra- conservatism (1). The spectrum of the right varies greatly from primarily young, uneducated, violent extremists who ruthlessly attack members of minority groups in Germany to intellectuals and journalists that are members of the New Right with influence in conservative politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Frauenleben in Magenza
    www.mainz.de/frauenbuero Frauenleben in Magenza Porträts jüdischer Frauen und Mädchen aus dem Mainzer Frauenkalender seit 1991 und Texte zur Frauengeschichte im jüdischen Mainz Frauenleben in Magenza Frauenleben in Magenza Die Porträts jüdischer Frauen und Mädchen aus dem Mainzer Frauenkalender und Texte zur Frauengeschichte im jüdischen Mainz 3 Frauenleben in Magenza Impressum Herausgeberin: Frauenbüro Landeshauptstadt Mainz Stadthaus Große Bleiche Große Bleiche 46/Löwenhofstraße 1 55116 Mainz Tel. 06131 12-2175 Fax 06131 12-2707 [email protected] www.mainz.de/frauenbuero Konzept, Redaktion, Gestaltung: Eva Weickart, Frauenbüro Namenskürzel der AutorInnen: Reinhard Frenzel (RF) Martina Trojanowski (MT) Eva Weickart (EW) Mechthild Czarnowski (MC) Bildrechte wie angegeben bei den Abbildungen Titelbild: Schülerinnen der Bondi-Schule. Privatbesitz C. Lebrecht Druck: Hausdruckerei 5. überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage Mainz 2021 4 Frauenleben in Magenza Vorwort des Oberbürgermeisters Die Geschichte jüdischen Lebens und Gemein- Erstmals erschienen ist »Frauenleben in Magen- delebens in Mainz reicht weit zurück in das 10. za« aus Anlass der Eröffnung der Neuen Syna- Jahrhundert, sie ist damit auch die Geschichte goge im Jahr 2010. Weitere Auflagen erschienen der jüdischen Frauen dieser Stadt. 2014 und 2015. Doch in vielen historischen Betrachtungen von Magenza, dem jüdischen Mainz, ist nur selten Die Veröffentlichung basiert auf den Porträts die Rede vom Leben und Schicksal jüdischer jüdischer Frauen und Mädchen und auf den Frauen und Mädchen. Texten zu Einrichtungen jüdischer Frauen und Dabei haben sie ebenso wie die Männer zu al- Mädchen, die seit 1991 im Kalender »Blick auf len Zeiten in der Stadt gelebt, sie haben gelernt, Mainzer Frauengeschichte« des Frauenbüros gearbeitet und den Alltag gemeistert.
    [Show full text]
  • HLAS DOMOVA Registered at the G.P.O
    ; HLAS DOMOVA Registered at the G.P.O. Melbourne for transmission by post as a periodical Ročník II. Melbourne, 8.prosince 1952 Číslo 25. Y_?-E22e_22.JP2EY§Y2Z2;L2 VZHÖRU, PSANCI .TÉTO ZEMĚ TnmmnTmnmnrrirfinmrrtmnnninnnnnirinnmnrinninniTir.inmnrnnnmnnrirnm "Člověk velikého intelektu, hluboce myslivý, přísně vážný, vnitř­ ně zanícený, krásných' osobních vlastností, -s čistýn ryzín charakterem a ušlechtilým cítěním. Viděli jsme, že hořel žhavou láskou k dělnické třídě a nadšením pro veliké revoluční dílo Leninovo a Stalinovo... Získal neocenitelné zásluhy o ukování KSČ jako strany nového leninsko- stalinského typu, jako strany bolševických zásad." V .-Kopecký o R. Sl ánském 31.7.51 v R u d é m P r á v u "Byl jsem nepřítelem komunistické strany a vytvořil jsem spiklene­ cké hnutí, abych rozložil stranu. Podobnou činnost jsem také vyvíjel uvnitř armády už od doby prvního československého povstání v roce 1942, kdy jsem aktivně působil proti zájmům Sovětského svazu a ve službách Benešova režimu. Jsem člověk s dvěrná politickými tvářeni. Ve skutečno­ sti jsem nikdy nebyl komunistou." R.Slánský o sobě 20.11.52 před soudem ____ ____ Ač to vypadá sebe po­ obžalovaných kuli sice ise "spontánně" přiznali. divněji, Kopeckého citát pikle v armádě i politi­ Bylo to velké defilé. je pravdivější než Slán­ ckém životě, ale proti Bývalý generální sekre­ ského autoportrét. Když I zájmům "Benešova, režimu" tář KSČ Rudolf Slánský pě­ si ho přeložíme ze sta- ja ve službách Sovětského stoval -styky se Západem, linštiny do češtiny, mu­ svazu. Ve skutečnosti dával informace nepřátel­ síme Slánskému přiznat zůstali až do konce pra­ ským agentům, jako předse­ "veliký intelekt". "Hlu­ vými komunisty.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONALITY LAW, 5712-1952* PART ONE: ACQUISITION of NATIONALITY 1. Israel Nationality Is Acquired- by Return (Section 2), By
    NATIONALITY LAW, 5712-1952* PART ONE: ACQUISITION OF NATIONALITY 1. Israel nationality is acquired- by return (section 2), by residence in Israel (section 3), Preliminary. by birth (section 4) or by naturalisation (section 5 to 9). There shall be no Israel nationality save under this Law. 2. (a) Every 'oleh** under the Law of Return, 5710-1950(1), shall become an Israel national. (b) Israel nationality by return is acquired- o (1) by a person who came as an 'oleh into, or was born in, the country before the establishment of the State - with effect from the day of the establishment of the State; o (2) by a person having come to Israel as an 'oleh after the establishment of the State - with effect from the day of his 'aliyah**; o (3) by a person born in Israel after the establishment of the Nationality State - with effect from the day of his birth; by Return. o (4) by a person who has received an 'oleh's certificate under section 3 of the Law of Return, 5710-1950 - with effect from the day of the issue of the certificate. (c) This section does not apply- o (1) to a person having ceased to be an inhabitant of Israel before the coming into force of this Law; o (2) to a person of full age who, immediately before the day of his 'aliyah or the day of his 'oleh's certificate is a foreign national and who, on or before such day, declares that he does not desire to become an Israel national; o (3) to a minor whose parents have made a declaration under paragraph (2) and included him therein.
    [Show full text]
  • Persistence and Activation of Right-Wing Political Ideology
    Persistence and Activation of Right-Wing Political Ideology Davide Cantoni Felix Hagemeister Mark Westcott* May 2020 Abstract We argue that persistence of right-wing ideology can explain the recent rise of populism. Shifts in the supply of party platforms interact with an existing demand, giving rise to hitherto in- visible patterns of persistence. The emergence of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) offered German voters a populist right-wing option with little social stigma attached. We show that municipalities that expressed strong support for the Nazi party in 1933 are more likely to vote for the AfD. These dynamics are not generated by a concurrent rightward shift in political attitudes, nor by other factors or shocks commonly associated with right-wing populism. Keywords: Persistence, Culture, Right-wing ideology, Germany JEL Classification: D72, N44, P16 *Cantoni: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat¨ Munich, CEPR, and CESifo. Email: [email protected]. Hagemeister: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat¨ Munich. Email: [email protected]. Westcott: Vivid Economics, Lon- don. Email: [email protected]. We would like to thank Leonardo Bursztyn, Vicky Fouka, Mathias Buhler,¨ Joan Monras, Nathan Nunn, Andreas Steinmayr, Joachim Voth, Fabian Waldinger, Noam Yuchtman, Ekaterina Zhuravskaya and seminar participants in Berkeley (Haas), CERGE-EI, CEU, Copenhagen, Dusseldorf,¨ EUI, Geneva, Hebrew, IDC Herzliya, Lund, Munich (LMU), Nuremberg, Paris (PSE and Sciences Po), Passau, Pompeu Fabra, Stock- holm (SU), Trinity College Dublin, and Uppsala for helpful comments. We thank Florian Caro, Louis-Jonas Hei- zlsperger, Moritz Leitner, Lenny Rosen and Ann-Christin Schwegmann for excellent research assistance. Edyta Bogucka provided outstanding GIS assistance. Financial support from the Munich Graduate School of Economics and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through CRC-TRR 190 is gratefully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Session of the Zionist General Council
    SESSION OF THE ZIONIST GENERAL COUNCIL THIRD SESSION AFTER THE 26TH ZIONIST CONGRESS JERUSALEM JANUARY 8-15, 1967 Addresses,; Debates, Resolutions Published by the ORGANIZATION DEPARTMENT OF THE ZIONIST EXECUTIVE JERUSALEM AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE n Library י»B I 3 u s t SESSION OF THE ZIONIST GENERAL COUNCIL THIRD SESSION AFTER THE 26TH ZIONIST CONGRESS JERUSALEM JANUARY 8-15, 1966 Addresses, Debates, Resolutions Published by the ORGANIZATION DEPARTMENT OF THE ZIONIST EXECUTIVE JERUSALEM iii THE THIRD SESSION of the Zionist General Council after the Twenty-sixth Zionist Congress was held in Jerusalem on 8-15 January, 1967. The inaugural meeting was held in the Binyanei Ha'umah in the presence of the President of the State and Mrs. Shazar, the Prime Minister, the Speaker of the Knesset, Cabinet Ministers, the Chief Justice, Judges of the Supreme Court, the State Comptroller, visitors from abroad, public dignitaries and a large and representative gathering which filled the entire hall. The meeting was opened by Mr. Jacob Tsur, Chair- man of the Zionist General Council, who paid homage to Israel's Nobel Prize Laureate, the writer S.Y, Agnon, and read the message Mr. Agnon had sent to the gathering. Mr. Tsur also congratulated the poetess and writer, Nellie Zaks. The speaker then went on to discuss the gravity of the time for both the State of Israel and the Zionist Move- ment, and called upon citizens in this country and Zionists throughout the world to stand shoulder to shoulder to over- come the crisis. Professor Andre Chouraqui, Deputy Mayor of the City of Jerusalem, welcomed the delegates on behalf of the City.
    [Show full text]
  • The Israel/Palestine Question
    THE ISRAEL/PALESTINE QUESTION The Israel/Palestine Question assimilates diverse interpretations of the origins of the Middle East conflict with emphasis on the fight for Palestine and its religious and political roots. Drawing largely on scholarly debates in Israel during the last two decades, which have become known as ‘historical revisionism’, the collection presents the most recent developments in the historiography of the Arab-Israeli conflict and a critical reassessment of Israel’s past. The volume commences with an overview of Palestinian history and the origins of modern Palestine, and includes essays on the early Zionist settlement, Mandatory Palestine, the 1948 war, international influences on the conflict and the Intifada. Ilan Pappé is Professor at Haifa University, Israel. His previous books include Britain and the Arab-Israeli Conflict (1988), The Making of the Arab-Israeli Conflict, 1947–51 (1994) and A History of Modern Palestine and Israel (forthcoming). Rewriting Histories focuses on historical themes where standard conclusions are facing a major challenge. Each book presents 8 to 10 papers (edited and annotated where necessary) at the forefront of current research and interpretation, offering students an accessible way to engage with contemporary debates. Series editor Jack R.Censer is Professor of History at George Mason University. REWRITING HISTORIES Series editor: Jack R.Censer Already published THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION AND WORK IN NINETEENTH-CENTURY EUROPE Edited by Lenard R.Berlanstein SOCIETY AND CULTURE IN THE
    [Show full text]
  • Government Commits to Seeking a Ban of the Extreme Right-Wing National Democratic Party of Germany (NPD)
    Government Commits to Seeking a Ban of the Extreme Right-Wing National Democratic Party of Germany (NPD). Suggested Citation: Government Commits to Seeking a Ban of the Extreme Right-Wing National Democratic Party of Germany (NPD)., 1 German Law Journal (2000), available at http://www.germanlawjournal.com/index.php?pageID=11&artID=6 [1] Through the Federal Minister of the Interior, Otto Schily, and Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder (both Social Democratic Party - “SPD”), the Federal Government has clearly expressed its intent to move ahead with a motion before the Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) seeking a ban of the extreme right-wing National Democratic Party of Germany (“NPD”). The Government’s insistence comes in spite of mere acquiescence on the issue from its coalition partner the Bündnis 90/GRÜNEN (Alliance 90/The Greens). It seemed as if Interior Minister Schily would be able to summon the support of a majority of the State Interior Ministers making it possible for a coalition of entities to bring the motion (including both Parliamentary Chambers, the executive branch of Government as well as a majority of the individual states) and thus thinly spreading the political risks associated with the move. The CDU (Christian Democratic Union) fraction in the Bundestag has recently announced, however, that it will oppose any efforts to submit a motion seeking a ban on the NPD and several States have announced their intention not to participate in the motion, leaving Interior Minister Schily in an awkward alliance with Bavarian (State) Interior Minister Günther Beckstein while prominent Social Democrats at the state level and Greens at the federal level continue to express reservations about the necessity for, the likely success of, and the ultimate effectiveness of a motion seeking a ban.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestine About the Author
    PALESTINE ABOUT THE AUTHOR Professor Nur Masalha is a Palestinian historian and a member of the Centre for Palestine Studies, SOAS, University of London. He is also editor of the Journal of Holy Land and Palestine Studies. His books include Expulsion of the Palestinians (1992); A Land Without a People (1997); The Politics of Denial (2003); The Bible and Zionism (Zed 2007) and The Pales- tine Nakba (Zed 2012). PALESTINE A FOUR THOUSAND YEAR HISTORY NUR MASALHA Palestine: A Four Thousand Year History was first published in 2018 by Zed Books Ltd, The Foundry, 17 Oval Way, London SE11 5RR, UK. www.zedbooks.net Copyright © Nur Masalha 2018. The right of Nur Masalha to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988. Typeset in Adobe Garamond Pro by seagulls.net Index by Nur Masalha Cover design © De Agostini Picture Library/Getty All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of Zed Books Ltd. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 978‑1‑78699‑272‑7 hb ISBN 978‑1‑78699‑274‑1 pdf ISBN 978‑1‑78699‑275‑8 epub ISBN 978‑1‑78699‑276‑5 mobi CONTENTS Acknowledgments vii Introduction 1 1. The Philistines and Philistia as a distinct geo‑political entity: 55 Late Bronze Age to 500 BC 2. The conception of Palestine in Classical Antiquity and 71 during the Hellenistic Empires (500‒135 BC) 3.
    [Show full text]
  • —PALESTINE and the MIDDLE EAST-N
    PALESTINE AND MIDDLE EAST 409 —PALESTINE AND THE MIDDLE EAST-n By H. Lowenberg— PALESTINE THE YEAR BEGINNINO June, 1947, and ending May, 1948 was among the most crucial and critical periods in Palestine's modern history. The United Nations' historic partition decision of November 29, 1947, divided the year into two halves, each of different importance for the Yishuv and indeed for all Jewry: the uneasy peace before, and the commu- nal war after the UN decision; the struggle to find a solution to the Palestine problem before, and to prepare for and defend the Jewish state after that fateful day. Outside Palestine, in the Middle East as a whole, the UN partition decision and the Arab rebellion against it, left a mark scarcely less profound than in Palestine itself. UNSCOP On May 13, 1947, the special session of the General As- sembly of the United Nations created the United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP) with instructions to "prepare and report to the General Assembly and submit such proposals as it may consider appropriate for the solution of the problem of Palestine . not later than September ,1, 1947." In Palestine, the Arabs followed news of UNSCOP with apparent indifference. They adopted an attitude of hostil- ity towards the Committee, and greeted it with a two-day protest strike starting on June 15, 1947. Thereafter, they 410 AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK took no further notice of the Committee, the Arab press even obeying the Mufti's orders not to print any mention of UNSCOP. This worried the Committee, as boycott by one side to the dispute might mean a serious gap in its fact finding.
    [Show full text]
  • Yigal Bin-Nun the Immigration from Islamic Countries In
    Journal of Media and Communications History in Israel and the Jewish World The Andrea and Charles Bronfman Institute for the Study of Jewish Press and Communications at Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv University, P.O.B. 39040 Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel; Tel. 972-3-6408665; Email: [email protected] Head of The Institute and Managing Editor of Kesher: Prof. Yosef Gorny Founder of The Institute: Shalom Rosenfeld First Editor of Kesher: Dr. Mordecai Naor No. 36, Autumn 2007 CONTENTS Editor Editorial / Yosef Gorny 2e Prof. Gideon Kouts Kesher 36 / Gideon Kouts 3e Foreign News and Contemporary History in the Early Hebrew Press Editorial Board Remarks on the “Invention” of Foreign News in the Hebrew Press Prof. Yosef Gorny, / Gideon Kouts 5e Prof. Dan Caspi, Dr. Mordecai Naor, Window on the World / Prof. Yoram Peri, Dr. Orly Tsarfaty, Ya’akov Shavit 7e Dr. Baruch Leshem, Dr. Uzi Elyada Covering Disaster in the Israeli Popular Press: Ha-Or and the Sinking of the Titanic / Ouzi Elyada 7e Editorial Assistant Daphna Kanner Cohen Iconology of Advertising in Israel: The Image of the Seashore / Avivit Agam Dali 8e Hebrew Copy Editor Herzlia Efrati Statesmen as Columnists in Israel Ahad Ha’am: Journalist in Practice, Potential Politician/ Shulamit Laskov 8e Proofreading Ben-Gurion’s Attitudes toward Communism / Yosef Gorny 9e Herzlia Efrati Moshe Sharett’s Transition from Journalism to Statesmanship, 1931 / Mordecai Naor 9e English Section Me’ir Ya’ari as an Artist of Polemic Writing / Aviva Halamish 10e Michal Engel Irit Shimrat Yitzhak Laufbahn, Editor of Ha-Poel ha-Tzair / Meir Chazan 10e Menachem Begin as a Journalist / Arye Naor 11e Graphic Editor Michal Semo-Kovetz The Price of Being Present: Yosef Haim Brenner as Cultural Hero / Nurit Govrin 11e Cover Design Media Darkness: The Attitude of The Times of London and The New Yael Kfir York Times to the Issue of the Displaced and Refugee Jews during the Last Year of World War II / Arie Kizel 12e Print The Jewish Press in Argentina after the U.N.
    [Show full text]