Environmental Impact Assessment Proposed Multitranche Financing
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Environmental Impact Assessment Project Number: 52220-001 September 2020 Draft Proposed Multitranche Financing Facility Republic of the Philippines: South Commuter Railway Project Volume 2 Annexes (Part 7) Prepared by the Department of Transportation for the Asian Development Bank. This is an updated version of the draft originally posted in July 2020 available on https://www.adb.org/projects/documents/phi-52220-001-eia NOTES This environmental impact assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area ANNEX 11-3 Public Hearing Report Department of Transportation Metro Manila Subway Project (MMSP) Phase 1 Environmental Performance Report and Management Plan Public Hearing Documentation Project Number: MNLD19050 Document Number: R19-17 09 September 2019 Public Hearing Report EPRMP for the Metro Manila Subway Project Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Danielle Danica Denise M. Solis Richard P. Andal Kathleen Anne Cruz Environmental Scientist III Senior Environmental Scientist Associate Director Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position Distribution List # Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name Prepared for: Department of Transportation AECOM Public Hearing Report EPRMP for the Metro Manila Subway Project Prepared for: Department of Transportation Sergio Osmeña Road, Clark Freeport Mabalabat, Pampanga Prepared by: AECOM Philippines, Inc. 14th Floor, Bonifacio Stopover Corporate Center 2nd Ave. corner of 31st St. Fort Bonifacio, Taguig City Philippines aecom.com © 2019 AECOM Philippines, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Philippines, Inc. (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: Department of Transportation AECOM Public Hearing Report EPRMP for the Metro Manila Subway Project Table of Contents 1. Public Hearing ............................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Summary of Issues and Concerns ............................................................................................................... 2 Annexes .................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Tables Table 1. Stakeholder List vis à vis Representatives Present at the Public Hearing ................................................. 1 Prepared for: Department of Transportation AECOM Public Hearing Report 1. Public Hearing The Public Hearing meeting of the MMSP was conducted last 03 September 2019 from 9:00 AM to 02:00 PM at the Tandang Sora Function Hall, TESDA Women’s Center located at the East Service Road, Taguig City. The Public Hearing was attended by 102 people whose received copies of the invitation letters are attached in Annex B while the stakeholders present during the Public hearing with respect to the stakeholder list presented in the PDS are shown in Table 1. The Public hearing was moderated by Atty. Sim C. Flores of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR). Also present in the Public hearing were representatives of the DOTr and the JICA Design Team (JDT) (the designers and General Consultant of the MMSP), the Review Committee and case handlers of the MMSP. The attendance sheets are attached in Annex C. Table 1. Stakeholder List vis à vis Representatives Present at the Public Hearing Stakeholder/Organization Head Attendance during the Public Hearing Proposed List of Stakeholders in the PDS Environmental Management Bureau - Jacqueline Caancan Representatives present National Capital Region (EMB-NCR) Office of the Mayor – Taguig Lino Cayetano - Office of the Mayor – Pasay Antonio Calixto - Office of the Mayor – Parañaque Edwin Olivarez Representative present City Planning and Development Office Arch. Hilda Candelario Representative present (CPDO) – Taguig CPDO – Pasay Engr. Merlita Lagmay Representative present CPDO – Parañaque Engr. Benigno Rivera Representative present Megaworld Corporation - Church of St. Therese Child of Jesus Msgr. Albert Conco - Church of St. Nazarene Representative present Makati South Hills Subdivision Robert Pasiloc Representative present United Parañaque Subdivision 1 Representatives present United Parañaque Subdivision 2 - United Parañaque Subdivision 3 Representative present United Parañaque Subdivision 4 Representative present United Parañaque Subdivision 5 - Barangay San Martin de Porres, Michael Thor Singson Representatives present Parañaque City Barangay 183, Pasay City Ruth Cortez Representative present Barangay Fort Bonifacio, Taguig City Jorge Daniel Bacobo Representative present Barangay Western Bicutan, Taguig City Perlita Carmen Representative present Women’s Organization Representative present Dr. Arcadio Santos National Concepcion C. Bernaldez Representative present Highschool Farmer’s Association - Senior Citizen’s Group Pasay Representative present Youth - General Public - Barangay Sto. Nino, Taguig City Representative present Bonifacio Naval Station Homeowners Representative present Association National Nutritional Council Representative present Stakeholders Present at the Public Hearing but not in the Original Stakeholder List Green Cross, Inc. Representative present GHD Representative present Philippine National Bank (Local Representative present Branch) City Environment and Natural Representative present Resources Office (CENRO) - Pasay City Environment and Natural Resources Office (CENRO) - Representative present Parañaque Prepared for: Department of Transportation AECOM 1 Public Hearing Report Stakeholder/Organization Head Attendance during the Public Hearing City Environment and Natural Representative present Resources Office (CENRO) – Taguig Technical Education and Skills Development Authority (TESDA) by Representative present Lawton Avenue MMDA Representative present City Engineer’s Office - Pasay Representative present Malugay - LGU Representative present PNP- SPD Representative present Sitio Malugay Representative present Barangay 183, Villamor Representative present Brangay 184, Maricaban Representative present 2. Summary of Issues and Concerns Module Questions and Suggestions Response 1. People UPS 1 will be highly affected, so how will DOTr USEC Timothy John Batan, DOTr ensure that all the options will be taken into consideration where the homeowners will not be USEC Batan discussed the affected by the project? overview of the future railway plans of the DOTr and how the MMSP fits within the planned railway network. USEC Batan showed that the MMSP links the railway planned up to Clark in the north and railway planned up to Calamba in the south 2. Land I believe there’s also a government property in the USEC Timothy John Batan, DOTr area that is near where UPS is. If the project is built The location of the Taguig there, it will not hit any existing community. intermodal station was key to the decision in choosing FTI as one of Or instead, how about if the PNR also goes the MMSP stations as the underground and meet the subway below? intermodal station is foreseen to link riders to the MMSP The underground structures of NAIA X interconnection and SLEX also were a major consideration to choosing the alignment and subway station in the Paranaque area since these structures go several meters underground. The flight path of planes going into and out of NAIA was also considered. These were considered during the consideration and eventual selection of the current proposed FTI station. 3. Land Why not construct bridge instead of temporary road. USEC Timothy John Batan, DOTr Then shift the construction yard of being instead going through our village maybe we can put it in the Initially, the proposed PNR station north after the construction? and the proposed FTI MMSP station were envisioned to be side Have you explored everything that we can do? by side occupying the 20 m PNR ROW, the 15 m ROW for the East Service Road an several meters into UHV for the temporary and Prepared for: Department of Transportation AECOM 2 Public Hearing Report permanent construction areas. However, it is being considered that the MMSP FTI station be located directly under the a proposed PNR station. The stations on top of each other will still occupy the 35 m total of the PNR ROW and East Service Rd. ROW but the East Service Rd. will need to be diverted north which will affect properties 15 m north of the UPS border. The MMSP will also need a temporary yard north of the diverted East Service Rd. with a width of 10 m which will be returned to the owners after the construction. 4.