Maharashtra Databook, Part-1 [2009-10]

Annual Performance Assessment Report of Urban Water supply and Sanitation - Maharashtra Databook, Part-1 [2009-10] CEPT University July 2014 DATABOOK PART - 1 State Profile Gondia Shirpur Morshi Katol Navapur Bhandara Akot Dhule Jamner SindiUmred Pachora Satana Brahmapuri Buldhana Hinganghat Patur Kannad Darhva Washim Mool Lonar ArniPandharkavda DahanuJawhar Sinnar Aurangabad Pusad Rajura Igatpuri Kalamnuri Kinwat Sangamner Ambad Jintur Paithan Rahuri Gevrai Pathardi Mudkhed Kalamb Beed Shirur Lonavala Ambajagai Deglur Daund Udgir MurudJanjira Barshi Kurduwadi Nilanga Shrivardhan Phaltan Murum Rahimatpur Solapur Chiplun Sangola Dudhani Ratnagiri Rajapur Gangapur Tiroda About Tableau maps: www.tableausoftware.com/mapdata Overall Performance All Sectors State Level Aggregation of Indicator Values for 2009-10 Gadhinglaj Umred Rajura Kinwat Kenj Chiplun Sangola About Tableau maps: www.tableausoftware.com/mapdata Water supply indicators Maximum Minimun Mean Median Mode Mean Count Coverage of water supply connections 100.0 0.0 54.7 53.0 0.0 249.0 Coverage of water supply connections in slums 100.0 0.0 23.9 19.7 0.0 227.0 Per capita available of water at consumer end 284.9 0.0 77.0 68.7 0.0 248.0 Extent of metering of water connections 100.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 250.0 Extent of Non Revenue Water 77.5 0.0 28.0 25.4 25.0 249.0 Continuity of water supply 24.0 0.0 1.4 1.0 1.0 250.0 Efficiency in redressal of customer complaints (WS) 100.0 0.0 81.5 92.0 100.0 243.0 Quality of water supplied 100.0 0.0 91.3 99.2 100.0 250.0 Cost recovery in water supply services 240.1 0.0 74.6 67.6 0.0 238.0 Efficieny in collection of water supply related charges 100.0 0.0 64.2 68.5 100.0 229.0 Wastewater indicators Maximum Minimun Mean Median Mode Mean Count Coverage of Toilets 100.0 0.0 75.4 79.2 100.0 248.0 Coverage of individual toilets in slums 100.0 0.0 15.0 6.8 0.0 216.0 Coverage of wastewater network services 100.0 0.0 4.6 0.0 0.0 250.0 Coverage of wastewater network services in slums 46.8 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 239.0 Collection efficiency of wastewater networks 95.4 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 247.0 Adequacy of wastewater treatment capacity 99.2 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 247.0 Quality of wastewater treatment 100.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 246.0 Extent of reuse and recycling of treated watsewater 100.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 248.0 Efficieny in redressal of customer complaints (WW) 100.0 0.0 87.4 99.1 100.0 248.0 Exetent of cost recovery in wastewater management 216.1 0.0 10.6 0.0 0.0 226.0 Efficiency in collection of sewerage charges 100.0 0.0 18.2 0.0 0.0 225.0 SWM indicators Maximum Minimun Mean Median Mode Mean Count Household level coverage of SWM services 100.0 0.0 67.0 75.0 100.0 248.0 HH level coverage of SWM services in slums 100.0 0.0 52.7 59.5 0.0 239.0 Extent of segregation of municipal solid waste 94.4 0.0 5.7 0.0 0.0 252.0 Extent of municipal solid waste recovered 100.0 0.0 8.8 0.0 0.0 252.0 Extent of scientific disposal of municipal solid waste 100.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 250.0 Efficiency in redressal of customer complaints (SWM) 100.0 0.0 90.2 100.0 100.0 249.0 Extent of cost recovery in solid waste management services 242.0 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 216.0 Efficiency in collection of solid waste management charges 100.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 239.0 Storm water drainage indicators Maximum Minimun Mean Median Mode Mean Count Coverage of Storm Water Drainage Network 168.2 0.0 21.4 3.6 0.0 252.0 Incidence of water logging/flooding 216.0 0.0 5.8 0.0 0.0 252.0 State Level Performance in Urban Water and Sanitation: 2009-10 Access and Coverage Coverage related indicators are measured at the smallest unit of a household (HH). For water and sanitation, the indicator measures households served by individual connection/ toilets, and for SWM, it measures households served by door to door collection of MSW. 2010 100 Benchmark Value = 100 % 80 e g 60 a t n e c r e P 40 20 0 Coverage of water supply Coverage of Toilets Coverage of WW network HH level coverage of SWM connections services services Equity in Service Delivery Equity in Service Delivery captures the variations in services provided within a city, across all sectors. Moreover, it measures the variations between poor and non-poor sections of the city. 2010 100 80 e g 60 a t n e c r e P 40 20 0 Coverage of water supply Coverage of individual toilets Coverage of WW network HH level coverage of SWM connections in slums in slums services in slums services in slums State Level Performance in Urban Water and Sanitation: 2009-10 Financial Sustainability Financial sustainability is measured based on the extent of O&M cost recovery in each sector; recovery through local charges and taxes. Another important aspect of financial sustainability is determined by the collection efficieny of service charges for all the sectors. Extent of Cost Recovery 2010 100 Benchmark Value = 100 % 80 e g 60 a t n e c r e P 40 20 0 Cost recovery in water supply services Exetent of cost recovery in WW Extent of cost recovery in SWM services management Efficiency of Collection of Service Charges 2010 100 Benchmark Value = 90 % 80 e g 60 a t n e c r e P 40 20 0 Efficieny in collection of water supply Efficiency in collection of sewerage Efficiency in collection of SWM charges related charges charges State Profile Water Supply Summary of Water Supply Services: 2009-10 Water Supply Coverage Total number of households Households served by water 7037931 supply connections 6872724 4683122 3110835 Water Production Ground sources 287 MLD 164 MLD Own surface sources Bulk water 1359 MLD Total water produced Purchased 536 MLD 6225 MLD 4579 MLD 5345 MLD 4644 MLD Service Levels ULBs supplying Avg. days Avg. duration Lpcd >= 100 of Supply of Supply 56 ULBs 23.3 days 1.35 hours 59 ULBs 22.6 days 1.54 hours State Level Performance in Water Supply Services: 2009-10 Coverage of water supply connections at HH level (%) Total households connected to the water supply network with a private (not shared) service connection, as percentage of total households in the ULB. 2010 Top Performing ULBs (2010) 100 Benchmark Value = 100 % Karad 100.0 Talegaon 96.0 ) Uran 95.3 % ( s 80 Pune 94.4 n o i t Gadhinglaj 93.7 c e Satara 93.2 n n o Thane 91.5 c y 60 l Vasai Virar 91.5 p p u Chopda 91.2 s r MiraBhayan.. 91.1 e t a Ambernath 90.9 w 40 f o Ulhasnagar 90.7 e g Kulgaon 86.7 a r e Daund 85.6 v o C 20 Nagpur 84.9 Daryapur 84.2 Murgud 83.5 0 Vaijapur 83.2 Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Other Municipalities Panhala 82.7 Jejuri 82.3 Coverage of water supply connections in 'slum settlements' (%) Total households in slum settlements connected to water supply network with a private (not shared) service connection, as percentage of total households in all slum settlements in the ULB. 2010 Top Performing ULBs (2010) 100 Daryapur 100.0 ) % Malakapur 100.0 ( s Mool 92.2 m u l Bhokardhan s 80 89.7 n i Warora 83.5 s n o Nagpur 82.0 i t c Jejuri e 81.0 n 60 n Nandgaon 79.0 o c y Tuljapur 77.9 l p p Pachgani 70.5 u s r 40 Sindkhed 68.8 e t a Morshi 67.8 w f Shahada 67.3 o e Mehkar 65.7 g a r 20 Desaiganj e 64.6 v o Kamtee 63.9 C Pulgaon 63.6 0 Gevrai 63.5 Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Other Municipalities Narkhed 63.5 Ambernath 63.1 Barshi State Level Performance in Water Supply Services: 2009-10 Per capita supply of water (Lpcd) This indicator captures the quantity of water supplied to consumers daily. This considers only authorized billed and unbilled residential consumers. 2010 Top Performing ULBs 160 (2010) Mahabaleshwar 284.9 Pune 228.0 140 Benchmark Value = 135 lpcd Navi Mumbai 222.2 ) Alibagh 216.8 d c 120 Shrivardhan 187.1 p L ( Karad 184.3 r e t a 100 Pandharpur 182.1 w f Pimpri Chinchwad 176.8 o y l Panvel 173.1 p 80 p u KalyanDombivli 166.0 s a MatheranGiristhan 159.2 t i p 60 a Thane 158.8 c r Ratnagiri 155.1 e P 40 Jejuri 150.9 Ulhasnagar 147.5 20 Ambernath 144.6 Khuldabad 140.4 0 Ichalkaranji 140.2 Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Other Municipalities Roha 139.8 Wai 139.3 Extent of metering of water connections (%) Total number of functional metered water connections expressed as a percentage of total number of water supply connections (including public stand post connections).

Load more