DOCSLIB.ORG

Climate Adaptation Actions for Urban Forests and Human Health

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Climate Adaptation Actions for Urban Forests and Human Health Forest Service U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Northern Research Station | General Technical Report NRS-203 | July 2021 CLIMATE ADAPTATION ACTIONS FOR URBAN FORESTS AND HUMAN HEALTH Abstract Urban areas can be particularly vulnerable to climate change due to extensive impervious cover, increased pollution, greater human population densities, and a concentration of built structures that intensify impacts from urban heat, drought, and extreme weather. Urban residents are at risk from a variety of climate stressors, which can cause both physical and mental harm. Urban forests and tree cover provide a critical role in helping cities address climate change by supporting greenhouse gas mitigation, reducing the impacts of extreme heat and altered climate that impair human health, and helping communities to adaptively respond through engagement with nature. At the same time, urban forests are vulnerable to changes in climate and in need of robust strategies to adapt to those changes. As climate change impacts increase, efforts to “green” cities and adapt urban forests to changing conditions take on greater importance to support human health and well-being. Urban forest managers and allied professionals are looking for information to reduce climate risks to urban forests and secure their benefits for people and ecosystems. This report, Climate Adaptation Actions for Urban Forests and Human Health, synthesizes adaptation actions to address climate change in urban forest management and promote human health and well-being through nature-based solutions. It compiles and organizes information from a wide range of peer- reviewed research and evidence-based reports on climate change adaptation, urban forest management, carbon sequestration and storage, and human health response to urban nature. This report includes the Urban Forest Climate and Health Adaptation Menu, which presents information and ideas for optimizing the climate and human health outcomes of urban forestry projects and provides professionals who are working at the intersection of climate, public health, and urban forestry with resources to support climate adaptation planning and activities. Notably, it does not provide specific recommendations or guidance for any particular place; rather, it offers a range of action opportunities at different scales that can be incorporated into either comprehensive or specific climate adaptation initiatives. The Menu can be used with an existing, tested adaptation process to help managers consider climate risks and explore the benefits and drawbacks of potential adaptation actions within the context of a particular situation or project. It also can be useful for generating productive discussions about community needs and values to guide planning, education and outreach, research, or changes in policy or infrastructure within communities. This publication was previously released as a postprint after undergoing technical and policy review. This final version includes a completed layout, changes to wording and grammar, and limited corrections to content. The most current version of the publication will always be available from the Digital Object Identifier (DOI): https://doi.org/10.2737/NRS-GTR-203. The use of trade, firm, corporation, or program names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Forest Service of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. Manuscript received for publication 26 April 2021 Published by: USDA FOREST SERVICE ONE GIFFORD PINCHOT DRIVE MADISON, WI 53726 Visit our homepage at https://nrs.fs.fed.us July 2021 CLIMATE ADAPTATION ACTIONS FOR URBAN FORESTS AND HUMAN HEALTH Maria K. Janowiak, Leslie A. Brandt, Kathleen L. Wolf, Mattison Brady, Lindsay Darling, Abigail Derby Lewis, Robert T. Fahey, Kristen Giesting, Eboni Hall, Molly Henry, Maisie Hughes, Jason W. Miesbauer, Kailey Marcinkowski, Todd Ontl, Annamarie Rutledge, Lydia Scott, and Christopher W. Swanston About the Authors Maria K. Janowiak is the deputy director of the Northern Institute of Applied Climate Science with the USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 410 MacInnes Drive, Houghton, MI 49931, [email protected]. Leslie A. Brandt is a climate change specialist with the Northern Institute of Applied Climate Science, USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region, 1992 Folwell Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108, [email protected]. Kathleen L. Wolf is a research social scientist with the College of the Environment, School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Box 352100, Seattle WA 98195, [email protected]. Mattison Brady is a student climate change adaptation specialist with the Northern Institute of Applied Climate Science and Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI 49931, [email protected]. Lindsay Darling is a geographic information systems administrator with the Morton Arboretum, 4100 Illinois Route 53, Lisle, IL 60532, [email protected]. Abigail Derby Lewis is director of the conservation tools program in the Keller Science Action Center at the Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 S. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605, [email protected]. Robert T. Fahey is an assistant professor at the University of Connecticut, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, and the Center for Environmental Sciences and Engineering, 1376 Storrs Road, Storrs, CT 06269, [email protected]. Kristen Giesting is a soil conservationist with the Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1333 East Liberty Circle, Greensburg, IN 47240, [email protected]. Eboni Hall is the senior manager of urban forestry education at American Forests, 1220 L St NW, Suite 750, Washington, D.C. 20005, [email protected]. Molly Henry is the senior manager of climate and health at American Forests, embedded in Division of Forest Environment at the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management, 235 Promenade St, Suite 394, Providence, RI 02908, [email protected]. Maisie Hughes is the senior director of urban forestry at American Forests, 1220 L St NW, Suite 750, Washington, D.C. 20005, [email protected]. Jason W. Miesbauer is an arboriculture scientist with the Morton Arboretum, 4100 Illinois Route 53, Lisle, IL 60532, [email protected]. Kailey Marcinkowski is a climate change education specialist with the Northern Institute of Applied Climate Science and Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI, 49931, [email protected]. Todd Ontl is a climate change adaptation specialist with the Northern Institute of Applied Climate Science and Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI, 49931, [email protected]. Annamarie Rutledge is a climate change outreach specialist with the Northern Institute of Applied Climate Science and Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI 49931, [email protected]. Lydia Scott is director of the Chicago Region Trees Initiative, located at the Morton Arboretum, 4100 Illinois Route 53, Lisle, IL 60532, [email protected]. Christopher W. Swanston is a research ecologist with the USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, the director of the Northern Institute of Applied Climate Science, and the director of the USDA Northern Forests Climate Hub, 410 MacInnes Drive, Houghton, MI 49931, [email protected] Acknowledgments Many individuals contributed to the guidance, review, and editing of this document. We would first like to extend our thanks to the authors of the first forest and urban forest menus upon which this work is based: Angela (Kerber) Levernier of Dupage County, Illinois; and Stephen Handler, Patricia Butler-Leopold, and Danielle Shannon of the Northern Institute of Applied Climate Science. We express gratitude to Sarah Hines, Sarah Hurteau, and Natalie van Doorn for the insightful and productive feedback in reviewing this document. We also are grateful to the hundreds of managers who have demonstrated the practical application of earlier iterations of our adaptation products, as well as the Rhode Island Urban Forests for Climate and Health Stakeholder Group, who helped us formulate this new menu of actions. This work would not be possible without their interest and feedback. The Doris Duke Charitable Foundation provided generous support to this project as part of a broader investment to optimize urban forests for climate and public health outcomes. Cover image created by Kailey Marcinkowski using USDA photo by Lance Cheung. Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 What Is The Urban Forest Climate and Health Menu? ................................................................................................................................4 An Adaptation Planning Process .......................................................................................................................................................................5 How to Read this Menu ........................................................................................................................................................................................7 Description of Menu Items ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Carbon Dioxide Removal Policy in the Making: Assessing Developments in 9 OECD Cases
    POLICY AND PRACTICE REVIEWS published: 04 March 2021 doi: 10.3389/fclim.2021.638805 Carbon Dioxide Removal Policy in the Making: Assessing Developments in 9 OECD Cases Felix Schenuit 1,2*, Rebecca Colvin 3, Mathias Fridahl 4, Barry McMullin 5, Andy Reisinger 6, Daniel L. Sanchez 7, Stephen M. Smith 8, Asbjørn Torvanger 9, Anita Wreford 10 and Oliver Geden 2 1 Center for Sustainable Society Research, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany, 2 German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP), Berlin, Germany, 3 Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia, 4 Department of Thematic Studies, Environmental Change, Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden, 5 Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland, 6 Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand, 7 Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management (ESPM), University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States, 8 Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom, 9 Center for International Climate Research (CICERO), Oslo, Norway, 10 Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit (AERU), Lincoln University, Christchurch, New Zealand Edited by: William C. Burns, Since the adoption of the Paris Agreement in 2015, spurred by the 2018 IPCC Special American University, United States Report on Global Warming of 1.5◦C, net zero emission targets have emerged as a Reviewed by: new organizing principle of climate policy. In this context, climate policymakers and Phillip Williamson, University of East Anglia, stakeholders have been shifting their attention to carbon dioxide removal (CDR) as United Kingdom an inevitable component of net zero targets. The importance of CDR would increase Charithea Charalambous, Heriot-Watt University, further if countries and other entities set net-negative emissions targets.
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping Global Warming Within 1.5°C Constrains Emergence of Aridification
    ` Keeping global warming within 1.5°C constrains emergence of aridification Chang-Eui Park1, Su-Jong Jeong1*, Manoj Joshi2, Timothy J. Osborn2, Chang-Hoi Ho3, Shilong Piao4,5,6, Deliang Chen7, Junguo Liu1, Hong Yang8,9, Hoonyoung Park3, Baek-Min Kim10, Song Feng11 1School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology (SUSTech), Shenzhen, China 2Climatic Research Unit, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK 3School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea 4Key Laboratory of Alpine Ecology and Biodiversity, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China 5Sino-French Institute for Earth System Science, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China 6Center for Excellence in Tibetan Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China 7Department of Earth Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden 8EAWAG, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland 9Faculty of Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland 10Korea Polar Research Institution, Inchon, Korea 11Department of Geosciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, 72701, AR, USA Nature Climate Change (Accepted) *Corresponding author: Prof. Su-Jong Jeong, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, South University of Science and Technology of China, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China ([email protected]) ` Aridity – the ratio of atmospheric water supply (precipitation; P) to demand (potential evapotranspiration; PET) – is projected to decrease (i.e., become drier) as a consequence of anthropogenic climate change, aggravating land degradation and desertification1-6. However, the timing of significant aridification relative to natural variability – defined here as the time of emergence for aridification (ToEA) – is unknown, despite its importance in designing and implementing mitigation policy7-10.
    [Show full text]
  • What Lies Beneath 2 FOREWORD
    2018 RELEASE THE UNDERSTATEMENT OF EXISTENTIAL CLIMATE RISK BY DAVID SPRATT & IAN DUNLOP | FOREWORD BY HANS JOACHIM SCHELLNHUBER BREAKTHROUGHONLINE.ORG.AU Published by Breakthrough, National Centre for Climate Restoration, Melbourne, Australia. First published September 2017. Revised and updated August 2018. CONTENTS FOREWORD 02 INTRODUCTION 04 RISK UNDERSTATEMENT EXCESSIVE CAUTION 08 THINKING THE UNTHINKABLE 09 THE UNDERESTIMATION OF RISK 10 EXISTENTIAL RISK TO HUMAN CIVILISATION 13 PUBLIC SECTOR DUTY OF CARE ON CLIMATE RISK 15 SCIENTIFIC UNDERSTATEMENT CLIMATE MODELS 18 TIPPING POINTS 21 CLIMATE SENSITIVITY 22 CARBON BUDGETS 24 PERMAFROST AND THE CARBON CYCLE 25 ARCTIC SEA ICE 27 POLAR ICE-MASS LOSS 28 SEA-LEVEL RISE 30 POLITICAL UNDERSTATEMENT POLITICISATION 34 GOALS ABANDONED 36 A FAILURE OF IMAGINATION 38 ADDRESSING EXISTENTIAL CLIMATE RISK 39 SUMMARY 40 What Lies Beneath 2 FOREWORD What Lies Beneath is an important report. It does not deliver new facts and figures, but instead provides a new perspective on the existential risks associated with anthropogenic global warming. It is the critical overview of well-informed intellectuals who sit outside the climate-science community which has developed over the last fifty years. All such expert communities are prone to what the French call deformation professionelle and the German betriebsblindheit. Expressed in plain English, experts tend to establish a peer world-view which becomes ever more rigid and focussed. Yet the crucial insights regarding the issue in question may lurk at the fringes, as BY HANS JOACHIM SCHELLNHUBER this report suggests. This is particularly true when Hans Joachim Schellnhuber is a professor of theoretical the issue is the very survival of our civilisation, physics specialising in complex systems and nonlinearity, where conventional means of analysis may become founding director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate useless.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Cover Ideas
    Frontiers of CDR December 2020 Chairman Additional Contributors Ernest J. Moniz, Founder and CEO Alex Breckel, Associate Research Director Alex Kizer, Research Director Project Director Alex Maranville, Research Fellow Joseph S. Hezir, Managing Principal Emily Tucker, Research Fellow Natalie Volk, Communications Associate. Project Coordinator Michael Knotek, EFI Distinguished Associate Figure Design Jami Butler - jamibutler.com Project Leads Tim Bushman, Senior Analyst Emeritus Sam Savitz, Analyst About Energy Futures Initiative The Energy Futures Initiative advances technically-grounded solutions to climate change through evidence-based analysis, thought leadership, and coalition-building. Under the leadership of Ernest J. Moniz, the 13th U.S. Secretary of Energy, EFI conducts rigorous research to accelerate the transition to a low-carbon economy through innovation in technology, policy, and business models. EFI maintains editorial independence from its public and private sponsors. Suggested Citation: Energy Futures Initiative. “Uncharted Waters: Expanding the Options for Carbon Dioxide Removal in Coastal and Ocean Environments.” December 2020. Cover Photo: Underwater kelp forest. Photo by barbaraaaa from Getty Images. © 2020 Energy Futures Initiative This publication is available as a PDF on the Energy Futures Initiative website under a Creative Commons license that allows copying and distributing the publication, only in its entirety, as long as it is attributed to Energy Futures Initiative and used for noncommercial educational or
    [Show full text]
  • 4-22-21 MA Paper on an EO on GHG Removal
    The Case for An Executive Order And Global Action To Assess, Develop and Deploy Greenhouse Gas Removal Technologies By John M. Fitzgerald, J.D. for Methane Action https://methaneaction.org April 17, 2021 We provide below a summary of some of the recent findings on negative emissions technologies (NETs) and active removal technologies. This summary also introduces the rationale for an Executive Order on GHG removal and a Global Agreement on Methane. The paper at some points addresses the President, as a briefing would, since these would be his executive order and his global initiative. — In the days leading up to the gathering of heads of state convened on Earth Day 2021 by President Joe Biden to consider cooperative action on climate change, thirty of the world's leading scientists with expertise ranging from climate science and atmospheric chemistry to conservation biology signed a letter urging national and global leaders to: 1) ensure that all countries are committed to aggressively reducing or mitigating methane emissions at their sources; 2) fund and initiate programs to monitor atmospheric methane and to research and develop technologies that reduce atmospheric methane safely and effectively; and 3) frame and implement a global agreement to return atmospheric methane concentrations to preindustrial levels. Methane Action, a new organization, and other nonprofit, public interest organizations with expertise in climate solutions wrote President Biden midday on Friday, April 16th to convey the scientists' letter and related materials saying: 1 We are writing to ask you to consider an executive order that builds on your Order of January 27, 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Climate Related Geo-Engineering on Biological Diversity
    CBD Distr. GENERAL UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/16/INF/28 5 April 20121 ENGLISH ONLY SUBSIDIARY BODY ON SCIENTIFIC, TECHNICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL ADVICE Sixteenth meeting Montreal, 30 April-5 May 2012 Item 7.3 of the provisional agenda* IMPACTS OF CLIMATE-RELATED GEOENGINEERING ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Note by the Executive Secretary 1. The Executive Secretary is circulating herewith, for the information of participants in the sixteenth meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice, a study on the impacts of climate-related geoengineering on biological diversity. 2. This study compiles and synthesizes available scientific information on the possible impacts of a range of geoengineering techniques on biodiversity, including preliminary information on associated social, economic and cultural considerations. The study also considers definitions and understandings of climate-related geoengineering relevant to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). The study has been prepared in response to paragraph 9 (l) of decision X/33, to address the elements of the mandate from that decision which relate specifically to the impacts of climate-related geoengineering on biodiversity. Related legal and regulatory matters are treated in a separate study (UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/16/INF/29). In addition, a separate consultation process has been undertaken by the Convention on Biological Diversity in order to seek the views of indigenous peoples and local communities on the possible impacts of geoengineering techniques on biodiversity and associated social, economic and cultural considerations (UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/16/INF/30). 3. This study has been prepared by a group of experts and the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, taking into account comments from two rounds of review by Parties, experts and stakeholders.3 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives of Land Evaluation of Floodplains Under Conditions of Aridification Based on the Assessment of Ecosystem Services
    DOI: 10.15201/hungeobull.69.3.1Lóczy, D. et al. HungarianHungarian Geographical Geographical Bulletin Bulletin 69 (2020) 69 2020 (3) 227–243. (3) 227–243.227 Perspectives of land evaluation of floodplains under conditions of aridification based on the assessment of ecosystem services Dénes LÓCZY1, Gergely TÓTH2, Tamás HERMANN2, Marietta REZSEK3, Gábor NAGY1, József DEZSŐ1, Ali SALEM3,4, Péter GYENIZSE1, Anne GOBIN5 and Andrea VACCA6 Abstract Global climate change has discernible impacts on the quality of the landscapes of Hungary. Only a dynamic and spatially differentiated land evaluation methodology can properly reflect these changes. The provision level, rate of transformation and spatial distribution of ecosystem services (ESs) are fundamental properties of landscapes and have to be integral parts of an up-to-date land evaluation. For agricultural land capability assessment soil fertility is a major supporting ES, directly associated with climate change through greenhouse gas emissions and carbon sequestration as regulationg services. Since for Hungary aridification is the most severe consequence of climate change, water-related ESs, such as water retention and storage on and below the surface as well as control of floods, water pollution and soil erosion, are of increasing importance. The productivity of agricultural crops is enhanced by more atmospheric CO2 but restricted by higher drought susceptibility. The value of floodplain landscapes, i.e. their agroecological, nature conservation, tourism (aesthetic) and other potentials, however, will be increasingly controlled by their water supply, which is characterized by hydrometeorological parameters. Case studies are presented for the estimation of the value of two water-related regulating ESs (water retention and groundwater recharge capacities) in the floodplains of the Kapos and Drava rivers, Southwest Hungary.
    [Show full text]
  • Institute for Carbon Removal Law and Policy 2020 Report
    ~ lNSTITUTEforCARBONREMOVAL I•J LAWANDPOLICY 2020 YEAR-END REPORT ~l, INSTITUTE.for CARBON REMOVAL - 1 - llliJ LAW AND POLICY This year has brought many unexpected difficulties and challenges. We as a global community have been forced to change courses of action and adapt. The Institute stands with all who have worked to persevere through the hardships, disappointments and devastations the year has brought. Although this year did not go as planned, we have still been able to engage in meaningful dialogue on many platforms, reinvigorate our Carbon Removal Working Group, pursue new projects and create partnerships and more. BACKGROUND The Institute for Carbon Removal Law and Policy (ICRLP or the Institute) is a scholarly initiative of the School of International Service at American University in Washington, D.C. The Institute was launched in October 2018 in response to growing scientific and political attention to carbon removal technologies and practices as a potential response mechanism to climate change. We are dedicated to assessing the social, legal, ethical, and political implications of carbon removal and to the characterization and promotion of sustainable carbon removal approaches. What is carbon removal? Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is the process of drawing carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere and locking it away in terrestrial, geological, or marine sinks or in long lived products for decades, centuries, or millennia, or utilizing captured carbon for purposes such as the generation of energy, chemicals production or to create high strength materials. The methods for doing so fall into three main camps: biological, geological, and carbon utilization. Carbon removal can also be referred to as carbon dioxide removal (CDR) or negative emissions technologies (NETs) or as one type of greenhouse gas removal (GGR).
    [Show full text]
  • Drought and Desertification in Iran
    hydrology Article Drought and Desertification in Iran Iraj Emadodin *, Thorsten Reinsch and Friedhelm Taube Institute for Crop Science and Plant Breeding, Group of Grass and Forage Science/Organic Agriculture, Hermann-Rodewald-Straße 9, 24118 Kiel, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-431-880-1516 Received: 1 April 2019; Accepted: 5 August 2019; Published: 7 August 2019 Abstract: Iran has different climatic and geographical zones (mountainous and desert areas), mostly arid and semi-arid, which are suffering from land degradation. Desertification as a land degradation process in Iran is created by natural and anthropogenic driving forces. Meteorological drought is a major natural driving force of desertification and occurs due to the extended periods of low precipitation. Scarcity of water, as well as the excessive use of water resources, mainly for agriculture, creates negative water balances and changes in plant cover, and accelerates desertification. Despite various political measures having been taken in the past, desertification is still a serious environmental problem in many regions in Iran. In this study, drought and aridity indices derived from long-term temperature and precipitation data were used in order to show long-term drought occurrence in different climatic zones in Iran. The results indicated the occurrence of severe and extremely severe meteorological droughts in recent decades in the areas studied. Moreover, the De Martonne Aridity Index (IDM) and precipitation variability index (PVI) showed an ongoing negative trend on the basis of long-term data and the conducted regression analysis. Rapid population growth, soil salinization, and poor water resource management are also considered as the main anthropogenic drivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Afforestation for Restoration of Land and Climate Change Mitigation
    Chapter 2 Afforestation for Restoration of Land and Climate Change Mitigation Authors Imre Berki András Bidló Áron Drüszler Attila Eredics Borbála Gálos Csaba Mátyás Norbert Móricz Ervin Rasztovits University of West Hungary Bajcsy-Zs, 4, H-9400 Sopron, Hungary University of West Hungary, Sopron, Hungary Chapter 2.1 Reforestation under climate change in temperate, water limited regions: current views and challenges Csaba Mátyás ABSTRACT reduce groundwater table level due to higher water use with consequences for water management. The forest/grassland transition zone is especially vulnerable to projected drastic temperature and precipitation shifts in the future. In spite of regional climate conditions is restricted. Ecologically conscious forest policy and management requires the consideration of local conditions, of projections of future climatic conditions and also of non-forest alternatives of land use. The chapter investigates some of the relevant aspects of the ecological role of forests at the dryland edges on the example of three countries/regions on three continents. 55 Chapter 2 1 INTRODUCTION In the drought-threatened regions of the Eurasian and North American forest steppe1 2 has been long considered as crucial in rehabilitating of degraded, over-exploited climatic conditions. resources are presently debated. Due to the limited understanding of interactions between physical processes and land cover, the dispute is still unresolved (Ellison et al. 2011), although the opinion prevails that in the forest steppe zone, water consumption not achieve the goals of environmental protection (Jackson et al., 2005; Sun et al., 2006; Andréassian, 2004; Brown et al., 2005; Wang, Y. et al., 2008). Projected changes in global climate pose a further challenge on dryland ecosystems, as relatively small changes in the moisture balance may lead to considerable ecological shifts.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood-Working Draft
    (To be published in the forthcoming issue of the Colorado Natural Resources, Energy & Environmental Law Review) Atmospheric Trust Litigation: Securing a Constitutional Right to a Stable Climate System* Mary Christina Wood† It is a privilege to be here in Boulder, which is a place I think of as a hub of climate action, with its young climate warriors, its renewable energy visionaries, and its dedicated league of citizens determined to create a safe future. And it is a supreme honor to give the lecture named after the two legal giants who have so shaped Indian law, natural resources law, and public lands law with their brilliant vision and dedication to justice. My honor is magnified by the immense gratitude I have towards Professor Charles Wilkinson, who has been an invaluable mentor and guiding light throughout my entire teaching career. He is the person who, in an unparalleled way, steps back from the law as it appears in the moment and contextualizes it in history, recognizing and identifying its organizing force through the ages. He is the one who captures the essence of legal principles and their driving rationale and inspires us all to reach towards the law no matter how daunting the challenge we face. It was largely his scholarship that led me into the heart of the public trust doctrine many years ago. I. This evening I will describe a litigation campaign and strategy that draws upon this public trust principle to confront the climate emergency. Let us begin with a simple recognition that we are the living beneficiaries of a public trust—a priceless trust.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Conceptual Framework for Land Degradation Neutrality
    SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR LAND DEGRADATION NEUTRALITY A Report of the Science-Policy Interface The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers and boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not this have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by the UNCCD in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the UNCCD. SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR LAND DEGRADATION NEUTRALITY A Report of the Science-Policy Interface How to cite this document: Orr, B.J., A.L. Cowie, V.M. Castillo Sanchez, P. Chasek, N.D. Crossman, A. Erlewein, G. Louwagie, M. Maron, G.I. Metternicht, S. Minelli, A.E. Tengberg, S. Walter, and S. Welton. 2017. Scientific Conceptual Framework for Land Degradation Neutrality. A Report of the Science-Policy Interface. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), Bonn, Germany. Published in 2017 by United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), Bonn, Germany © 2017 UNCCD. All rights reserved. UNCCD-SPI Technical Series No.01 ISBN 978-92-95110-60-1
    [Show full text]