European Politics and the Euro Crisis: Ten Failures

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

European Politics and the Euro Crisis: Ten Failures policy paper European Politics and the Euro Crisis: Ten Failures Kirsty Hughes Associate Fellow of Friends of Europe and Senior Associate Fellow, Centre for International Studies, University of Oxford, UK Introduction The euro crisis is deepening and accelerating of the Merkel-led containment strategy. But it is week by week. It is a political and economic not working, and the crisis is clearly now a crisis not only of the eurozone but of the political and social crisis not just an economic European Union as a whole and with potentially one – and one that affects the entire EU, and far-reaching consequences. There is intense beyond. debate over the different likely outcomes to the crisis: whether the eurozone will survive intact This note outlines ten main failures of with 17 members (although very likely with leadership in managing the eurozone crisis: many member states mired in recession), or three political and leadership failures, four whether the eurozone may split or collapse democratic failures, and three economic entirely. All of these scenarios have major failures. These are all, inevitably, intertwined implications for the European Union as a whole and each implies fairly directly a more positive – politically as well as economically. If the and desirable alternative route.Whether the eurozone collapses this could threaten the euro can be saved remains to be seen but if the future of the EU altogether. If the zone splits or EU and its member states are to come through is mired in low growth, there will also be this deep crisis in the least damaging way, the substantial economic and political impacts – EU's (and not just the eurozone's) leaders must across European and internationally. Yet the rapidly confront their political, democratic and focus of most of the discussion, and action, is on economic failings in the handling of the crisis the fire-fighting to hold the eurozone together and start to tackle it in a strategic and rather than on the wider political and comprehensive way. democratic failures that have emerged starkly across the EU as a whole. Above all, there is a need for a clear, positive political strategy and vision for the EU, to show Efforts to contain and manage the Greek debt that the EU is more than just a single currency, crisis over the last 18 months have failed, with that it has a current and future political, social attention shifting to Italy, on to Spain, and with and economic purpose and dynamic. The EU's bond market pressures rising in November in so- leaders should be acting now both to change called core euro countries including France and how they tackle the eurozone crisis and to limit the Netherlands, and with even Germany the deep damage it is also doing to the EU's struggling to sell its bonds towards the end of political role, dynamics and influence at home the month. Yet the mantra of the German-led and internationally. strategy to solve the crisis is 'no change', budgetary discipline remaining the core element policypaper A. Political and Leadership Failures that increases the democratic deficit and political crisis through strengthening the centralised Political, leadership and democratic aspects of the imposition of the existing technocratic, highly crisis are closely interlinked. But while some of the deflationary and failing solutions to the euro crisis. failures identified below suggest weaknesses in, or even contempt for, the role of democracy, others are Exactly a decade back, at the Laeken summit in failures of leadership and strategy not of democracy December 2001, the EU's then leaders set out a per se. So this first section concentrates on the main vision of a more effective, and a more democratic strategic political and leadership challenges, while Europe with a bigger, clearer role in the world3. the next section identifies the key democratic Today's European leaders seem to have no such failures. vision or strategy. In the midst of crisis, Europe's leaders, backed by their finance ministers, are solely Failure No. 1: Lack of European political on the defensive. And the foreign ministers of the 27 vision and strategy member states are notable by their absence. The Lisbon innovations meant to give clearer strategic Over the last 18 months or more, the sequence of leadership to the EU through the permanent summits, emergency meetings of the Merkel- European Council President – Herman van Rompuy – Sarkozy duo, and more recently of the Frankfurt and a stronger foreign policy high representative/ Group, and general fire-fighting in the face of commissioner – Cathy Ashton – have for now failed, volatile and panicked markets have dominated the with Rompuy and Ashton competing for invisibility, headlines. Throughout this whole period, there has albeit with Commission presidentJose Manuel been no serioushigh-level political leadership in the Barroso much more visible, if often on a parallel EU setting out a positive overarching vision or track to France and Germany, and at least trying still strategy of what today's EU is and where it is going. to ensure decisions encompass the EU 17 or 27 not The talk has been only of austerity, of discipline, and just the directoire. of free market routes to growth. Failure No. 2: Mishandling political In the midst of crisis, fire-fighting may come first, relations between member states – direc- but, given its depth and breadth, putting the crisis in context and showing that the EU is a major political, toire of two, inner core of 17, or EU of 27? social and economic organisation with a clear role at home, in its region and in the world is vital to The EU is not always a happy consensus-driven limiting the political and geopolitical damage the political family – summit rows explode, policy crisis is doing. Showing both in Europe and globally, differences run deep. But a balance has usually been that the EU still has a clear, strategic, positive maintained over time: the big countries know or political role and purpose should have been,and knew they couldn't just run the show and ignore must become, a priority. smaller member states, and long run differences of view between north, south and eastern members on Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel has talked of free trade, or regional funds, or relations with the US, saving the euro as central to the future of the were all factored in. European Union but the treaty changes she envisages are more integration to enforce budgetary As an example, back in 2001, when Tony Blair hosted discipline through a tougher role of the European a dinner in Downing Street – with the then French Commission and of the European Court of Justice. and German leaders Jacques Chirac and Gerhard She calls both of these 'political' solutions and refers Schroeder, Romano Prodi (as head of the Commission to 'fiscal union',although hers is a partial fiscal union but also from a large member state Italy) and Javier of budgetary discipline but without fiscal transfers1. Solana as the EU's foreign policy supremo (but from She does not talk of the positive domestic, Spain, another larger country) – the Dutch prime democratic, social, political, regional or geopolitical minister Wim Kok memorably flew in uninvited, in role of the EU – her vision is crisis management, time for dessert, seeing it as vital that the 'big5' did little else. And the leaked draft German proposals2 not think they could have such meetings and ignore for treaty change in 2012 suggest that issues of the fundamental political need to have coalitions and political integration and possible debates around groupings that included smaller as well as bigger questions of democracy and legitimacy are for a member states. later date, 'in the longer term', with nothing to say about these central and urgent questions now. So Germany above all, amongst the bigs, used to the route to treaty change in 2012 risks being one understand this dynamic, and would often make w ww.friendsofeurope.org November2011|2 » policypaper common cause with smaller countries, not least the Barroso, it has barely happened. Benelux trio. But in the euro crisis, Germany has become the dominant player, even within the This neglect of political dynamics across both the 17 Merkel-Sarkozydirectoire of joint press conferences and the 27 has weakened European political and emergency bilateral meetings. To the extent that solidarity amongst the EU's leaders, and seriously this has broadened recently, with meetings since aggravated the alienation provoked by the sight of October 2011 of the so-called Frankfurt Group, it is a Merkel and Sarkozy apparently giving out diktats to group of officials, not member states (including a the rest of Europe, in particular but not only to non-EU institution, the IMF): Merkel, Sarkozy, Greece and Italy. This puzzling and unnecessary Barroso, Van Rompuy, Olli Rehn (as European neglect of all the known and best lessons of economic and finance Commissioner, Mario Draghi European political dynamics is a failure of leadership (head of the ECB), Jean-Claude Juncker (as chair of and adds to the sense of weakening democratic the euro group of finance ministers) and Christine legitimacy of the management of the euro crisis. Lagarde (head of the IMF)4. Unusually too, some German commentators and politicians have been Failure No. 3:Geopolitical failure – publicly frank about Germany's growing dominance – neglecting the EU's role in its region and a senior member of Merkel's CDU party, Volker globally Kauder's, statement in November that "suddenly Europe is speaking German" has already become The EU's leaders have failed to maintain any serious infamous. political space on the agenda for other political issues, not least foreign policy ones.
Recommended publications
  • Télécharger (79.278 Kb
    COMMISSION EUROPEENNE Bruxelles, le 8 mars 2013 CALENDRIER du 11 au 17 mars 2013 (Susceptible de modifications en cours de semaine) Activités des Institutions Déplacements et visites Lundi 11 mars Foreign Affairs Council (FAC) Mr Andris PIEBALGS receives Secretary of State of Foreign Affairs and Cooperation of Portugal, Mr Brites PEREIRA and General Affairs Council (GAC) Secretary of State of European Affairs of Portugal, Mr Transport, Telecommunications and Miguel MORAIS LEITÃO Energy Council (TTE Transport) Ms Androulla VASSILIOU in Dublin: gives a press European Parliament plenary session conference at the Royal Hospital Kilmainham (RHK); (11-14/03) delivers opening speech at the "EU Youth conference 2013" organised by the Irish presidency Ms Maria DAMANAKI and Mr Dacian CIOLOŞ in Dublin: deliver speeches at the meeting of the AgriFish Committees Chairpersons from National Parliaments of the European Union. Mr Dacian CIOLOŞ also delivers a speech at the European Young Farmers conference Ms Kristalina GEORGIEVA attends the Friends of Europe event "Japan Seminar - For a More Resilient Word" Ms Cecilia MALMSTRÖM receives Ms Eva Birgitta OHLSSON, Minister for European Union Affairs of Sweden Ms Cecilia MALMSTRÖM receives Ms Vesna PUSIĆ, First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign and European Affairs of Croatia Mardi 12 mars Mr Maroš ŠEFČOVIČ meets Ms M. Michel BARNIER rencontre M. Benoît HAMON, Ministre Lucinda CREIGHTON, Minister of délégué auprès du ministre français de l'Economie et des State for European affairs of Ireland,
    [Show full text]
  • A Dynamic and Democratic Eu Or Muddling Through Again? Assessing the Eu’S Draft Constitution
    EUROPEAN EPIN POLICY INSTITUTE NETWORK EPIN WORKING PAPER NO. 8 JULY 2003 A DYNAMIC AND DEMOCRATIC EU OR MUDDLING THROUGH AGAIN? ASSESSING THE EU’S DRAFT CONSTITUTION KIRSTY HUGHES This series of Working Papers is published by the European Policy Institutes Network (EPIN). Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed are attributable only to the author in a personal capacity and not to any institution with which she is associated. ISBN 92-9079-450-X Available for free downloading from the CEPS website (http://www.ceps.be) Copyright 2003, Kirsty Hughes CEPS gratefully acknowledges financial support received for EPIN from the Prince Programme of the European Commission. Place du Congrès 1 ▪ B-1000 Brussels ▪ Tel: (32.2) 229.39.11 ▪ Fax: (32.2) 219.41.51 ▪ VAT: BE 424.123.986 e-mail: [email protected] • website: at www.epin.orghttp://www.ceps.be A DYNAMIC AND DEMOCRATIC EU OR MUDDLING THROUGH AGAIN? ASSESSING THE EU’S DRAFT CONSTITUTION EPIN WORKING PAPER NO. 8/JULY 2003 * KIRSTY HUGHES Introduction The draft Constitution is on the table. Attention is moving towards the traditional intergovernmental game that will be played out at the intergovernmental conference (IGC) during autumn 2003 – and quite possibly into early 2004 (despite the intentions of the Italian presidency). Much of the structure and the detailed substance of the draft treaty will stay but the IGC will be far from a rubber-stamp exercise. Moreover, despite the pessimists’ (or perhaps realists’) view that the IGC will only make the draft Constitution worse, the governments do have an opportunity to improve and clarify many areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Reshaping Europe: Visions for the Future
    Reshaping Europe Visions for the future Nick Butler, Philip Dodd, Stephanie Flanders, Timothy Garton Ash and Kirsty Hughes Edited by Charles Grant iv ABOUT THE AUTHORS Nick Butler is Group Policy Adviser at BP and chairs the management committee of the Centre for European Reform. Philip Dodd edits Sight and Sound, the magazine of the British Film Institute. He is also the author of “Englishness: Politics and Culture 1880-1920”. Stephanie Flanders is a columnist and leader-writer on the Financial Times. She previously taught at Harvard University’s Department of Goverment and at its Kennedy School. Timothy Garton Ash is a fellow of St Antony’s College, Oxford. His books include “The Polish Revolution” and “In Europe’s name: Germany and the Divided Continent”. Charles Grant is defence editor of The Economist. He is also the author of “Delors: Inside the house that Jacques built”. Kirsty Hughes is head of the European Programme at the Royal Institute of International Affairs. She previously worked for the Policy Studies Institute. # The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors themselves and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the CER or of its trustees. v Contents About the authors iv Introduction—Nick Butler 1 The Europe we need—Timothy Garton Ash 4 Resetting Europe’s priorities—Stephanie Flanders 9 In defence of Brussels—Charles Grant 17 Europe’s flexible future—Kirsty Hughes 29 The quest for a European identity—Philip Dodd 36 vi 1 Introduction Nick Butler This pamphlet, and its publisher, the Centre for European Reform, are the fruit of what could legitimately be called Generation E—individuals born since 1950 who take it for granted that when they talk about politics, culture, economics or security, Europe is their natural frame of reference.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle for Power in Europe Will the Convention Get It Right?
    EPIN EUROPEAN POLICY INSTITUTE NETWORK EPIN WORKING PAPER NO. 4 FEBRUARY 2003 THE BATTLE FOR POWER IN EUROPE WILL THE CONVENTION GET IT RIGHT? KIRSTY HUGHES This is the fourth in a new series of Working Papers published by the European Policy Institutes Network. Kirsty Hughes is a senior research fellow at CEPS. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed are attributable only to the author in a personal capacity and not to any institution with which she is associated. ISBN 92-9079-419-4 Available for free downloading from the CEPS website (http://www.ceps.be) © Copyright 2003, Kirsty Hughes CEPS gratefully acknowledges financial support received for EPIN from the Prince Programme of the European Commission. Place du Congrès 1 ▪ B-1000 Brussels ▪ Tel: (32.2) 229.39.11 ▪ Fax: (32.2) 219.41.51 ▪ VAT: BE 424.123.986 e-mail: [email protected] • website: at www.epin.orghttp://www.ceps.be THE BATTLE FOR POWER IN EUROPE WILL THE CONVENTION GET IT RIGHT? EPIN WORKING PAPER NO. 4/FEBRUARY 2003 KIRSTY HUGHES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As it enters the final phase of its work, the jury is still out as to how well – or whether – the Convention will answer the three big Laeken challenges: to bring the EU closer to the European public; to create an effective political structure and operation for the enlarged EU; and to give the EU a genuine global role. The Convention has made considerable achievements in its work already and has developed a strong, if complex, political dynamic. But it is the big institutional decisions which will impact most strongly on both efficiency and democracy in the enlarged EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Choices for a Digital Age
    JUNE 2017 POLICY CHOICES FOR A DIGITAL AGE TAKING A WHOLE ECONOMY, WHOLE SOCIETY APPROACH DISCUSSION PAPER This publication is part of Friends of Europe’s work on digitalisation and the 4th Industrial Revolution, undertaken in the framework of our New Economic Models programme. It brings together the views of Friends of Europe’s large network of policymakers, scholars, civil society and business representatives on digitalisation and the 4th Industrial Revolution. It closes a series of three high-level working group meetings that Friends of Europe organised in 2016 – 2017 to explore the impact of the 4th Industrial Revolution across policymaking, industry and society. JUNE 2017 POLICY CHOICES FOR A DIGITAL AGE TAKING A WHOLE ECONOMY, WHOLE SOCIETY APPROACH DISCUSSION PAPER The authors in this discussion paper contribute in their personal capacities, and their views do not necessarily reflect those of the organisations they represent, nor of Friends of Europe and its board of trustees, members or partners. Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted, provided that full credit is given to Friends of Europe, and that any such reproduction, whether in whole or in part, is not sold unless incorporated in other works. Friends of Europe is grateful for the financial support it received from Google and the input of the McKinsey Global Institute for the publication of this paper. Friends of Europe was responsible for guaranteeing editorial balance and full independence, as evidenced by the variety of the articles’ authors and the contents of the contributions. Publisher: Geert Cami Directors: Nathalie Furrer & Dharmendra Kanani Editor: David O’Leary Programme Manager: Natasha Ibbotson Design: José Gonçalves Communications Assistants: Carys Lawrie & Iiris André © Friends of Europe - June 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD Andrus Ansip 8 OVERVIEW Dharmendra Kanani 11 PART 1: RETHINKING ECONOMIC MODELS – GDP OR DATA 16 Moving beyond the balance-sheet economy Michael Mandel 17 Transatlantic cooperation and collaboration on the digital economy Daniel A.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Elections Gearing up for a "New" India?
    INDIAN ELECTIONS GEARING UP FOR A "NEW" INDIA? Summer 2014 In association with Media partner INDIAN ELECTIONS GEARING UP FOR A "NEW" INDIA? Report of the policy insight organised by Friends of Europe in association with European Indian Chamber of Commerce (EICC) with media partner Europe’s World Summer 2014 Brussels This report reflects the rapporteur’s understanding of the views expressed by participants. Moreover, these views are not necessarily those of the Table of contents organisations that participants represent, nor of Friends of Europe, its Board of Trustees, members or partners. Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted, provided that full credit is POLICY INSIGHT given to Friends of Europe and that any such reproduction, whether in whole or in part, is not sold unless incorporated in other works. Indian elections: Gearing up for a "new" India? 7 Great expectations: Hopes and challenges of Narendra Modi's mandate 7 EU-India strategic partnership: After looking East, will Modi also turns West? 11 Is there still space for an opposition? 15 ANNEX I - Programme 17 Rapporteur: Emanuela Mangiarotti ANNEX II - List of participants 19 Publisher: Geert Cami Director: Nathalie Furrer Programme Manager: Patricia Diaz Photographer, Design & Layout: Cristina Frauca © Friends of Europe, Summer 2014 Indian elections: Gearing up for a "new" India? | Summer 2014 7 POLICY INSIGHT Indian elections: Gearing up for a "new" India? Indian voters have given a resounding mandate for reform and change to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, sparking high expectations of a “new” and more dynamic India. Yet, a number of challenges confront “Team Modi”, including growing demands for an end to corruption, measures to tackle the scourge of poverty, create new jobs and play a more decisive international role.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement from the High Level Group of the Africa Europe Foundation
    Statement from the High Level Group of the Africa Europe Foundation 11 March 2021 1 Africa Europe Foundation call for action on vaccines The High-Level Group of Personalities of the Africa Europe Foundation has been monitoring the political negotiations involving member nations of the WTO and G20 and is calling today for decisive action on COVID-19 Vaccine Access. Defeating COVID-19, reinforcing our partnership on health and investing in the required capacity- building and infrastructure for vaccine distribution requires urgent political and financial investment in a common future for Africa and Europe. The WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic on 11 March 2020 and almost a year later, over 100 million people have been infected with the death toll exceeding two and a half million. Hundreds of millions have lost their jobs and we face the worst economic crisis in seventy years. In the global world we share, ending the pandemic depends on ensuring that vaccines and treatments are available to everyone, regardless of where and how they live. Vaccines are an essential component to ending the pandemic, allowing restrictions on social interaction and economic activity to be lifted. Extraordinary global research efforts have created a pipeline of new vaccine candidates. But if they are only available to a few countries or continue to be auctioned off to the highest bidder, we will extend the life of the pandemic. For as long as the virus is spreading anywhere, the risk of mutations remains and the impact on economies and livelihoods will continue. In short, none of us are safe until all of us are safe.
    [Show full text]
  • LSE Brexit: Does Scotland Really Want to Stay in the Single Market Without a Say in the Rules? Page 1 of 3
    LSE Brexit: Does Scotland really want to stay in the single market without a say in the rules? Page 1 of 3 Does Scotland really want to stay in the single market without a say in the rules? The Scottish government has made a strong case for staying in the single market and the customs union, writes Kirsty Hughes (Scottish Centre on European Relations). It contrasts with the lack of detail from either the UK government or the Opposition – though glosses over the democratic implications of leaving the UK with no say in the running of the single market. But with public opinion in Scotland decisively in favour of Remain, it gives Nicola Sturgeon plenty of manoeuvre if she decides to call for a second independence referendum after the details of Britain’s trade deal emerge. The Scottish government’s new paper on Brexit choices – ‘Scotland’s Place in Europe: People, Jobs and Investment’ – makes an important contribution to the UK political debate. It argues that, if the UK is not to follow the best option of staying in the European Union, it should stay in the EU’s single market and in a customs union with the EU. But what this in-depth 54 page paper does not do is either directly make a case for halting Brexit nor for holding a second independence referendum. The detailed economic analysis in the report shows that a ‘soft’ Brexit of staying in the EU’s single market and customs union is significantly better than a free trade agreement with the EU, let alone simply trading on WTO rules.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPE 2030 TOWARDS a RENEWED EUROPEAN SOCIAL CONTRACT Author: Pascal Lamy with Contributions of Mathew J
    1 PASCAL LAMY WITH CONTRIBUTIONS OF MATHEW J. BURROWS, ANTONIA ERLANDSSON, OLIVER GNAD, DHARMENDRA KANANI, JACQUES BUGHIN AND ROMAN PABLE EUROPE 2030 TOWARDS A RENEWED EUROPEAN SOCIAL CONTRACT Author: Pascal Lamy With contributions of Mathew J. Burrows, Antonia Erlandsson, Oliver Gnad, Dharmendra Kanani, Jacques Bughin and Roman Pable Publisher: Geert Cami Director: Dharmendra Kanani and Nathalie Furrer Knowledge Partner: The McKinsey Global Institute (MGI) Programme Executive: Antonia Erlandsson Editors: Iiris André and Angela Pauly Design: Elza Lőw Programme Assistants: Elisa Abrantes © Friends of Europe - September 2018 1 Remembering the foundations of the European social contract Since the Maastricht Treaty of the European Union, signed in 1992, the EU’s social contract has been underpinned with the following principles (extracts from the Treaty): PEACE, VALUES AND WELLBEING ECONOMIC UNION The Union’s aim is to promote peace, its values and The Union shall establish an economic and the wellbeing of its peoples. monetary union whose currency is the euro. SECURITY AND JUSTICE PEACE AND HUMAN RIGHTS The Union shall offer its citizens an area of freedom, IN THE WORLD security and justice without internal frontiers, in In its relations with the wider world, the Union which the free movement of persons is ensured in shall uphold and promote its values and interests conjunction with appropriate measures with respect and contribute to the protection of its citizens. It to external border controls, asylum, immigration and shall contribute to peace, security, the sustainable the prevention and combating of crime. development of the Earth, solidarity and mutual respect among peoples, free and fair trade, eradication of poverty and the protection of human PROSPEROUS INTERNAL MARKET rights, in particular the rights of the child, as well The Union shall establish an internal market.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Written Submission from Dr Annalisa Savaresi As Numerous Reports and Experts Have Pointed out Already, Brexit Is Likely To
    Written submission from Dr Annalisa Savaresi As numerous reports and experts have pointed out already, Brexit is likely to have several implications for environmental law and governance in the UK1 and Scotland.2 The nature of these implications largely depends on the mode of Brexit and will vary between areas of environmental governance. This note provides some early reflections on what these implications may be, drawing on examples from selected areas of environmental law and policy. The implications of Brexit for Scottish environmental law and governance Brexit may significantly affect the exercise of the powers of devolved administrations, casting uncertainty over their ability to achieve objectives embedded in existing environmental laws and policies. For example, in the past the implementation of Scottish climate change and renewable energy policies benefited from supportive EU legal frameworks and financial assistance. Without such support, Scotland will have to find new means to achieve its objectives. The Scottish Government has already announced that, notwithstanding Brexit, it intends to maintain a high level of ambition in environmental protection. Its successfulness in doing so largely depends on future environmental governance arrangements within and outwith the UK. Three elements seem to be of particular importance: 1) Scotland’s future relationship with the EU; 2) differences between areas of EU environmental law and policy; and 3) international environmental cooperation post-Brexit. These three matters are considered in turn below. Scotland’s future relationship with the EU The Scottish Government has expressed a preference for joining/remaining part of the European Economic Area (EEA), either autonomously or together with the rest of the UK.3 Conversely, the UK Government seems to have discarded this option.4 To date no subnational entities have ever joined the EEA.
    [Show full text]
  • TOWARDS an AMBITIOUS, BROAD, DEEP and FLEXIBLE EU-UK PARTNERSHIP? EU-UK Partnership? Deep Andflexible Ambitious, Broad, Towards An
    7 JUNE 2020 Andreas Aktoudianakis Przemysław Biskup Benjamin Bodson Andreas Eisl Elvire Fabry Agata Gostyńska-Jakubowska David Henig Towards an Kirsty Hughes Juha Jokela Carsten Jung Rem Korteweg ambitious, broad, Alexander Mattelaer Anand Menon Jonathan Portes Nicolai von Ondarza deep and flexible Jannike Wachowiak Alan Wager EU-UK partnership? Fabian Zuleeg UK PARTNERSHIP? UK - TOWARDS AN AMBITIOUS, BROAD, DEEP AND FLEXIBLE EU FLEXIBLE AND DEEP BROAD, AMBITIOUS, AN TOWARDS EDITING Emi Vergels GRAPHIC DESIGN Mariusz Dabek mgraphicdesign.eu PHOTOGRAPHY iStock LEGAL DEPOSIT D/2020/10.825/2 June 2020 This publication is available free of charge on epc.eu The support the European Policy Centre receives for its ongoing operations, or specifically for its publications, does not constitute an endorsement of their contents, which reflect the views of the authors only. Supporters and partners cannot be held responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Towards an ambitious, broad, deep and flexible EU-UK partnership? Andreas Aktoudianakis Carsten Jung Przemysław Biskup Rem Korteweg Benjamin Bodson Alexander Mattelaer Andreas Eisl Anand Menon Elvire Fabry Jonathan Portes Agata Gostyńska-Jakubowska Nicolai von Ondarza David Henig Jannike Wachowiak Kirsty Hughes Alan Wager Juha Jokela Fabian Zuleeg EUROPEAN POLICY CENTRE 1 2 TOWARDS AN AMBITIOUS, BROAD, DEEP AND FLEXIBLE EU-UK PARTNERSHIP? TABLE OF CONTENTS About the EPC 4 About the Brexit Think Tank Group 5 About the authors 6 Foreword – Michel Barnier 10 1. The bigger picture: The impact of COVID-19 on the EU-UK relationship Jannike Wachowiak and Fabian Zuleeg 13 PART I The impact of Brexit on the United Kingdom 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Brochure
    The think tank for a more inclusive, sustainable and forward-looking Europe WHAT WE BELIEVE IN #EUROPEMATTERS In 2018, Friends of Europe launched its from Europe is security, jobs, and tackling flagship initiative #EuropeMatters, bringing climate change. Citizens also want more say together business leaders, policymakers, in the decision-making process and better civil society representatives and citizens to transparency. co-design a Europe that still matters in 2030, within the framework of a renewed European We set out a vision for the Europe we want social contract. The initiative serves as the in our #EuropeMatters report, one that is guiding principle across Friends of Europe’s based on input from our multi-stakeholder current activities. engagement and the messages we heard from citizens. This vision became a set of Since initiating the #EuropeMatters project, concrete recommendations for the 2019 a vast network of stakeholders and citizens European leadership on security, prosperity have contributed to the development of four and sustainability. By focusing on the policy scenarios setting out plausible futures for areas that matter most to people, these can Europe in 2030. These were debated at the help reinvigorate the relationship between 15th edition of our annual flagship high- citizens and the European project. level roundtable, the State of Europe. We also conducted a poll of 11,000 EU citizens, Our objective is to mobilise a coalition which revealed striking insights across of the willing, united by their belief that regions, gender and age – including the #EuropeMatters and to together ensure that general belief that the EU is mostly irrelevant Europe is better prepared to take strategic in their lives.
    [Show full text]