DOCSLIB.ORG

LST Reporting Year County Municipality PSD Code School District Name Total Resident Income

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LST Reporting Year County Municipality PSD Code School District Name Total Resident Income 2019 POLITICAL SUBDIVISION (PSD) CODE LIST EIT LST Total Municipal Resident Non Reporting PSD Total LST County Municipality School District Name Income Resident EIT Collector Year Code (dollars) Tax EIT (percent) (percent) Berkheimer Tax 2019 POTTER ABBOTT TWP 530301 GALETON AREA S D 1.00 0.00 0.00 Administrator ABBOTTSTOWN CONEWAGO VALLEY S York Adams Tax 2019 ADAMS 010201 1.50 1.00 52.00 BORO D Bureau Berkheimer Tax 2019 MONTGOMERY ABINGTON TWP 460101 ABINGTON S D 1.00 1.00 52.00 Administrator Berkheimer Tax 2019 CAMBRIA ADAMS TWP 110601 FOREST HILLS S D 1.00 1.00 52.00 Administrator Berkheimer Tax 2019 BUTLER ADAMS TWP 100401 MARS AREA S D 1.00 1.00 10.00 Administrator Berkheimer Tax 2019 SNYDER ADAMS TWP 550101 MIDD-WEST S D 2.30 0.50 0.00 Administrator Berkheimer Tax 2019 WESTMORELAND ADAMSBURG BORO 650701 HEMPFIELD AREA S D 1.00 0.50 52.00 Administrator Lancaster County Tax 2019 LANCASTER ADAMSTOWN BORO 360101 COCALICO S D 1.00 1.00 52.00 Collection Bureau TURKEYFT VLLY AREA Capital Tax Collection 2019 SOMERSET ADDISON BORO 561001 1.00 0.00 0.00 SD Bureau TURKEYFT VLLY AREA Capital Tax Collection 2019 SOMERSET ADDISON TWP 561002 1.00 0.00 0.00 SD Bureau Lancaster County Tax 2019 LANCASTER AKRON BORO 360701 EPHRATA AREA S D 1.00 0.00 0.00 Collection Bureau Berkheimer Tax 2019 BRADFORD ALBA BORO 080601 TROY AREA S D 1.00 0.00 0.00 Administrator Berks Earned Income 2019 BERKS ALBANY TWP 061001 KUTZTOWN AREA S D 1.00 1.00 52.00 Tax Bureau Berkheimer Tax 2019 BRADFORD ALBANY TWP 080701 WYALUSING AREA S D 1.44 0.00 0.00 Administrator Berkheimer Tax 2019 ERIE ALBION BORO 251101 NORTHWESTERN S D 1.00 1.00 52.00 Administrator Berkheimer Tax 2019 LEHIGH ALBURTIS BORO 390301 EAST PENN S D 1.00 1.00 52.00 Administrator Keystone Collections 2019 DELAWARE ALDAN BORO 231501 WILLIAM PENN S D 0.00 0.00 52.00 Group Keystone Collections 2019 ALLEGHENY ALEPPO TWP 711101 QUAKER VALLEY S D 1.00 0.00 39.00 Group Keystone Collections 2019 GREENE ALEPPO TWP 300501 WEST GREENE S D 1.00 1.00 0.00 Group Capital Tax Collection 2019 HUNTINGDON ALEXANDRIA BORO 310201 JUNIATA VALLEY S D 1.75 0.00 0.00 Bureau Berkheimer Tax 2019 BEAVER ALIQUIPPA CITY 040101 ALIQUIPPA S D 1.50 1.50 104.00 Administrator COUDERSPORT AREA Berkheimer Tax 2019 POTTER ALLEGANY TWP 530201 1.00 1.00 10.00 S D Administrator NORTHERN POTTER S Berkheimer Tax 2019 POTTER ALLEGANY TWP 530401 1.00 1.00 0.00 D Administrator ALLEG.-CLARION Keystone Collections 2019 BUTLER ALLEGHENY TWP 160103 1.00 0.00 52.00 VALLEY SD Group BERLIN Capital Tax Collection 2019 SOMERSET ALLEGHENY TWP 560101 1.00 0.50 0.00 BROTHERSVALLEY SD Bureau HOLLIDAYSBURG Blair County Tax 2019 BLAIR ALLEGHENY TWP 070401 1.00 0.00 52.00 AREA S D Bureau Berkheimer Tax 2019 WESTMORELAND ALLEGHENY TWP 650902 KISKI AREA S D 1.00 0.00 52.00 Administrator Berkheimer Tax 2019 CAMBRIA ALLEGHENY TWP 110901 PENN CAMBRIA S D 1.00 0.50 10.00 Administrator Berkheimer Tax 2019 VENANGO ALLEGHENY TWP 200506 TITUSVILLE AREA S D 1.00 0.00 10.00 Administrator NORTHAMPTON AREA Keystone Collections 2019 NORTHAMPTON ALLEN TWP 480501 1.20 1.00 52.00 S D Group Keystone Collections 2019 WASHINGTON ALLENPORT BORO 630501 CALIFORNIA A S D 1.00 1.00 52.00 Group Berkheimer Tax 2019 LEHIGH ALLENTOWN CITY 390101 ALLENTOWN CITY S D 1.98 1.28 52.00 Administrator KEYSTONE CENTRAL S Keystone Central 2019 CLINTON ALLISON TWP 180103 1.50 0.50 10.00 D School District Tax BerksOffice Earned Income 2019 BERKS ALSACE TWP 061201 OLEY VALLEY S D 1.00 1.00 0.00 Tax Bureau Blair County Tax 2019 BLAIR ALTOONA CITY 070101 ALTOONA AREA S D 1.60 1.40 52.00 Bureau Berkheimer Tax 2019 MONTGOMERY AMBLER BORO 462201 WISSAHICKON S D 1.00 1.00 52.00 Administrator Berkheimer Tax 2019 BEAVER AMBRIDGE BORO 040201 AMBRIDGE AREA S D 1.00 1.00 52.00 Administrator DANIEL BOONE AREA S Berks Earned Income 2019 BERKS AMITY TWP 060501 1.00 1.00 52.00 D Tax Bureau Berkheimer Tax 2019 ERIE AMITY TWP 251301 WATTSBURG AREA S D 1.00 1.00 10.00 Administrator Keystone Collections 2019 WASHINGTON AMWELL TWP 631301 TRINITY AREA S D 1.00 1.00 52.00 Group Berkheimer Tax 2019 MCKEAN ANNIN TWP 420401 PORT ALLEGANY S D 1.00 0.00 0.00 Administrator Keystone Collections 2019 LEBANON ANNVILLE TWP 380101 ANNVILLE-CLEONA S D 1.40 0.00 52.00 Group JERSEY SHORE AREA Municipal and School 2019 LYCOMING ANTHONY TWP 410204 1.60 0.50 0.00 S D Earned Income Tax KeystoneOffice Collections 2019 MONTOUR ANTHONY TWP 490601 WARRIOR RUN S D 1.80 1.00 0.00 Group Blair County Tax 2019 BLAIR ANTIS TWP 070201 BELLWOOD-ANTIS S D 1.00 0.00 52.00 Bureau GREENCASTLE- Franklin County Area 2019 FRANKLIN ANTRIM TWP 280301 1.00 0.50 52.00 ANTRIM S D Tax Bureau Berkheimer Tax 2019 SUSQUEHANNA APOLACON TWP 580401 MONTROSE AREA S D 0.00 0.00 0.00 Administrator Berkheimer Tax 2019 ARMSTRONG APOLLO BORO 030101 APOLLO-RIDGE S D 1.00 0.00 10.00 Administrator Berkheimer Tax 2019 ARMSTRONG APPLEWOLD BORO 030201 ARMSTRONG S D 1.00 1.00 0.00 Administrator SUSQUEHANNA COMM Berkheimer Tax 2019 SUSQUEHANNA ARARAT TWP 580601 0.00 0.00 0.00 S D Administrator Berkheimer Tax 2019 LACKAWANNA ARCHBALD BORO 351001 VALLEY VIEW S D 1.00 1.00 52.00 Administrator ARENDTSVILLE York Adams Tax 2019 ADAMS 010601 UPPER ADAMS S D 1.60 1.00 10.00 BORO Bureau Berkheimer Tax 2019 INDIANA ARMAGH BORO 320701 UNITED S D 1.35 0.00 10.00 Administrator Keystone Collections 2019 MIFFLIN ARMAGH TWP 440101 MIFFLIN COUNTY S D 1.35 1.00 52.00 Group Berkheimer Tax 2019 BRADFORD ARMENIA TWP 080602 TROY AREA S D 1.00 0.00 0.00 Administrator Berkheimer Tax 2019 INDIANA ARMSTRONG TWP 320301 INDIANA AREA S D 1.26 1.00 10.00 Administrator SOUTH WILLIAMSPORT Municipal and School 2019 LYCOMING ARMSTRONG TWP 410701 1.60 0.00 0.00 A S D Earned Income Tax NEW KENSNGTN- BerkheimerOffice Tax 2019 WESTMORELAND ARNOLD CITY 651301 1.00 1.00 52.00 ARNLD S D Administrator Berkheimer Tax 2019 WESTMORELAND ARONA BORO 651701 YOUGH S D 1.00 0.00 10.00 Administrator NORTH SCHUYLKILL S Berkheimer Tax 2019 SCHUYLKILL ASHLAND BORO 540402 1.00 0.00 52.00 D Administrator Keystone Collection 2019 CLARION ASHLAND TWP 160401 KEYSTONE S D 1.00 0.00 10.00 Group Berkheimer Tax 2019 LUZERNE ASHLEY BORO 400401 HANOVER AREA S D 1.00 1.00 52.00 Administrator Berkheimer Tax 2019 CAMBRIA ASHVILLE BORO 110902 PENN CAMBRIA S D 1.00 0.50 10.00 Administrator Keystone Collections 2019 ALLEGHENY ASPINWALL BORO 710401 FOX CHAPEL AREA S D 1.00 1.00 52.00 Group Keystone Collections 2019 DELAWARE ASTON TWP 230701 PENN-DELCO S D 1.00 1.00 0.00 Group Berkheimer Tax 2019 BRADFORD ASYLUM TWP 080501 TOWANDA AREA S D 1.24 0.00 0.00 Administrator Lancaster County Tax 2019 CHESTER ATGLEN BORO 361301 OCTORARA AREA S D 1.00 0.00 0.00 Collection Bureau Berkheimer Tax 2019 BRADFORD ATHENS BORO 080101 ATHENS AREA S D 1.56 1.00 0.00 Administrator Berkheimer Tax 2019 BRADFORD ATHENS TWP 080102 ATHENS AREA S D 1.56 1.00 52.00 Administrator Berkheimer Tax 2019 CRAWFORD ATHENS TWP 200401 PENNCREST S D 1.00 1.00 0.00 Administrator Berkheimer Tax 2019 ARMSTRONG ATWOOD BORO 030202 ARMSTRONG S D 1.00 1.00 0.00 Administrator Berkheimer Tax 2019 SCHUYLKILL AUBURN BORO 540101 BLUE MOUNTAIN S D 1.00 1.00 10.00 Administrator Berkheimer Tax 2019 SUSQUEHANNA AUBURN TWP 580201 ELK LAKE S D 1.00 1.00 0.00 Administrator Berkheimer Tax 2019 POTTER AUSTIN BORO 530101 AUSTIN AREA S D 1.00 1.00 10.00 Administrator Keystone Collections 2019 ALLEGHENY AVALON BORO 710901 NORTHGATE S D 1.00 0.00 52.00 Group JERSEY SHORE AREA Municipal and School 2019 CLINTON AVIS BORO 410201 1.60 0.50 52.00 S D Earned Income Tax BerkheimerOffice Tax 2019 LUZERNE AVOCA BORO 400801 PITTSTON AREA S D 1.00 1.00 52.00 Administrator Keystone Collections 2019 CHESTER AVONDALE BORO 150101 AVON GROVE S D 1.00 1.00 0.00 Group Berkheimer Tax 2019 WESTMORELAND AVONMORE BORO 650903 KISKI AREA S D 1.00 0.00 52.00 Administrator Capital Tax Collection 2019 FULTON AYR TWP 290101 CENTRAL FULTON S D 1.00 0.00 0.00 Bureau Berkheimer Tax 2019 BEAVER BADEN BORO 040202 AMBRIDGE AREA S D 1.00 0.50 52.00 Administrator KEYSTONE CENTRAL S Keystone Central 2019 CLINTON BALD EAGLE TWP 180104 1.50 0.50 52.00 D School District Tax BALDWIN-WHITEHALL JordanOffice Tax Service 2019 ALLEGHENY BALDWIN BORO 730101 1.00 1.00 52.00 S D BALDWIN-WHITEHALL Jordan Tax Service 2019 ALLEGHENY BALDWIN TWP 730102 1.00 0.00 52.00 S D BOYERTOWN AREA S Berks Earned Income 2019 BERKS BALLY BORO 060201 1.00 0.00 52.00 D Tax Bureau Keystone Collections 2019 NORTHAMPTON BANGOR BORO 480101 BANGOR AREA S D 1.23 1.00 52.00 Group Berkheimer Tax 2019 CARBON BANKS TWP 400501 HAZLETON AREA S D 1.50 1.00 52.00 Administrator PUNXSUTAWNEY Berkheimer Tax 2019 INDIANA BANKS TWP 330301 1.00 1.00 0.00 AREA S D Administrator Berkheimer Tax 2019 VENANGO BARKEYVILLE BORO 610201 FRANKLIN AREA S D 1.00 1.00 52.00 Administrator Berkheimer Tax 2019 JEFFERSON BARNETT TWP 330201 BROOKVILLE AREA S D 1.00 1.00 10.00 Administrator Keystone Collections 2019 FOREST BARNETT TWP 270102 FOREST AREA S D 1.00 1.00 10.00 Group NORTHERN CAMBRIA S Berkheimer Tax 2019 CAMBRIA BARR TWP 110801 1.00 0.00 10.00 D Administrator Capital Tax Collection 2019 HUNTINGDON BARREE TWP 310202 JUNIATA VALLEY S D 1.75 0.00 0.00 Bureau POCONO MOUNTAIN S Berkheimer Tax 2019 MONROE BARRETT TWP 450301 1.00 1.00 52.00 D Administrator Berkheimer Tax 2019 SCHUYLKILL BARRY TWP 541101 TRI-VALLEY S D 1.00 0.00 10.00 Administrator Lancaster County Tax 2019 LANCASTER BART TWP 361601 SOLANCO S D 1.65 0.00 0.00 Collection Bureau JERSEY SHORE AREA Municipal and School 2019 LYCOMING BASTRESS TWP 410205 1.60 0.00 0.00 S D Earned Income Tax NORTHAMPTON AREA KeystoneOffice Collections 2019 NORTHAMPTON
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2017 Census of Governments, State Descriptions: School District Governments and Public School Systems
    NCES 2019 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Education Demographic and Geographic Estimates (EDGE) Program 2017 Census of Governments, State Descriptions: School District Governments and Public School Systems Education Demographic and Geographic Estimates (EDGE) Program 2017 Census of Governments, State Descriptions: School District Governments and Public School Systems JUNE 2019 Doug Geverdt National Center for Education Statistics U.S. Department of Education ii U.S. Department of Education Betsy DeVos Secretary Institute of Education Sciences Mark Schneider Director National Center for Education Statistics James L. Woodworth Commissioner Administrative Data Division Ross Santy Associate Commissioner The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) is the primary federal entity for collecting, analyzing, and reporting data related to education in the United States and other nations. It fulfills a congressional mandate to collect, collate, analyze, and report full and complete statistics on the condition of education in the United States; conduct and publish reports and specialized analyses of the meaning and significance of such statistics; assist state and local education agencies in improving their statistical systems; and review and report on education activities in foreign countries. NCES activities are designed to address high-priority education data needs; provide consistent, reliable, complete, and accurate indicators of education status and trends; and report timely, useful, and high-quality data to the U.S. Department of Education, Congress, states, other education policymakers, practitioners, data users, and the general public. Unless specifically noted, all information contained herein is in the public domain. We strive to make our products available in a variety of formats and in language that is appropriate to a variety of audiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Title
    Centre County Demographics and Travel Patterns The purpose of this chapter is to describe Centre County in terms of demographics, major and minor trip generators, planning and zoning, and travel patterns. This information, when considered relative to the inventory of available transportation modes in Centre County, helps to identify specific areas that present the greatest need for transportation improvements. The large land area of Centre County (almost 1,100 square miles), and the County’s mountain ridges and valleys impact the physical layout of transportation infrastructure. Demographic indicators must also be considered within the context of these geographic attributes. Within this chapter, socioeconomic data at the census tract level from the 2010 US Census, 2009-13 American Community Survey (ACS), and the information from Chamber of Business and Industry of Centre County (CBICC) is presented relative to the following categories: • Population and Density • Vehicle Availability • Income and Poverty • Labor Force and Unemployment • Public Assistance and SSI Income • Educational Attainment • Distribution of Jobs • Distribution of Age 65 and Older Population and Social Security Income • Distribution of Disabled Population • Housing Figure 2, which is a map of census tracts within Centre County, is presented on the following page. Centre County Long Range Transportation Plan 2044 Page II- 1 Centre County Demographics & Travel Patterns Figure 2 A map of Centre County planning regions is presented on the following page as Figure 3. Planning
    [Show full text]
  • Erie County Municipality Population Changes, 2000 to 2017
    Erie County Municipality Population Changes, 2000 to 2017 August, 2018 Erie County Department of Health 606 West 2nd Street Erie, PA 16507 Telephone: 814-451-6700 Website: ECDH This report was prepared by Jeff Quirk, Epidemiologist ([email protected]). The primary sources of data and information for this report are the Erie County Department of Health and the United States Census Bureau. Background: From 2000 to 2010, Erie County’s population remained level at around 280,000 residents. However, since 2010 the county’s population fell by over 6,000 residents, with losses occurring for the past five consecutive years (Figure 1). This report details the population changes that have taken place among the county’s 38 municipalities for the period 2000-2017. Figure 1 284,000 281,502 282,000 281,288 280,843 280,566 280,647 280,000 279,351 278,111 278,000 276,321 Population 276,000 274,541 274,000 272,000 2000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Erie County’s 38 municipalities include 2 cities, 14 boroughs, and 22 townships. These municipalities vary greatly in total population and size (land area). In 2017, municipality populations ranged from a low of 209 residents in Elgin Borough to a high of 97,369 in the City of Erie, while land areas ranged from a low of 0.3 square miles in Wattsburg Borough to a high of 50.0 in Waterford Township. From an overall numbers perspective, 12 municipalities increased in population since 2000 (Table 1, Figure 2). Harborcreek Township experienced the largest gain with an increase of 2,225 residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Penns Valley Rail Trail
    CHAPTER 2 PHYSICAL FEASIBILITY— what is the condition of the railbed now, and what are the opportunities and constraints to repurposing it as a rail trail? Like the ingenuous footpaths Native Americans mapped out along the most dry level and direct route through the ridges and valleys centuries ago, the L&T’s surveyors and engineers followed the lowlands near the center of the valley and the gaps through the mountains carved by the creek to avoid steep slopes, locating the railbed on the natural bench above the creek or creating a new bench for the railbed where none existed before to avoid wet areas and washouts from annual Spring freshets and the occasional 100 year flood or hurricane. For the most part, that strategy worked, explaining why much of the railbed remains intact today, more than a century after it was built. Nevertheless, the corridor is not without its issues. Many sections of the railbed are overgrown with small trees and impassable thickets of invasive shrubs, the stone ballast oftentimes hidden from view beneath verdant beds of grass and moss. Puddling occurs in places where culverts filled in after the railbed was abandoned. In some areas, the railbed has been altered, removed or already repurposed for driveways, fencerows and cropland, or more intensive uses, like the Penn Township sewer plant and the Grange Fair concessions area. Some lands are in ag preservation, which prohibits non-agricultural activities, including trails. The floor of both tunnels are littered with rock, calling into question the safety of their use by the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenge of Defining a National Urban Strategy in the Context of Divergent Demographic Trends in Small and Large Canadian Cities
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Western Washington University The challenge of defining a national urban strategy in the context of divergent demographic trends in small and large Canadian cities Gilles Viaud, Department of Geography, CURA – Quality of life indicator researcher, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada, V2C 5N3. Email: [email protected] Abstract: Once forgotten as an object of research, a growing literature dealing with various aspects of small cities has emerged since the new millennium. The answer to the question “does size matter?” has so far received positive empirical support on both sides of the Atlantic. Using the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) three quality of life studies as backdrop, this paper offers further evidence that small Canadian cities are worth our attention. Since 1999, FCM has extrapolated results from its series of quality of life studies carried out on a sample of large and medium sized cities to monitor key changes in the quality of life of Canadian urban residents. Conclusions drawn from these studies have been used to define a common Canadian municipal agenda which identifies air pollution, public transportation, affordable housing, homelessness, social inclusion and integration, and community safety and security as some of Canada’s key urban policy priorities. Following the evolution of a number of key demographic indicators in larger and smaller Canadian cities between 1996 and 2006, this research questions whether the municipal agenda derived from FCM’s quality of life studies offers a fair and just reflection of the reality and of the public policy priorities of smaller urban municipalities.
    [Show full text]
  • County Regulation of Land Use and Development
    Volume 9 Issue 2 Spring 1969 Spring 1969 County Regulation of Land Use and Development Edward C. Walterscheid Recommended Citation Edward C. Walterscheid, County Regulation of Land Use and Development, 9 Nat. Resources J. 266 (1969). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol9/iss2/9 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resources Journal by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. COUNTY REGULATION OF LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT In New Mexico, a county is "a body corporate and politic."' It should not be equated with a municipal corporation, being in the strictest sense distinguishable from such a corporation, but rather is more correctly termed a quasi-municipal corporation. It has only such powers as are expressly or impliedly given to it by constitutional or legislative provisions. 3 As originally adopted in 1911, the New Mexico Constitution was silent as to the powers of counties. In the ensuing years it has been amended to allow for the formation of two special types of counties constitutionally having powers at least as broad as those of municipalities. 4 However, only one specialized county has yet been authorized 4a-and no others appear likely in the near future-so that with this one exception all counties existing for the next few years are likely to remain dependent on legislative grants for their powers.5 By statute, all counties are empowered: First.
    [Show full text]
  • Nittany Valley Fact Sheet.Pub
    NITTANY VALLEY REGION UNEMPLOYMENT RATES 7.8% LABOR FORCE DATA 6.2% 5.9% 5.7% 5.5% The majority of residents from the Nittany Valley work 30 4.3% 3.6% minutes or less from their residence and drive to work. 3.8% Nittany Valley has a strong workforce with low unemployment rates. The employees are highly educated with higher percent- ages of high school graduates than the State and Nation. Bellefonte Benner Marion Spring Walker Centre PA U.S. County COMMUTING TO WORK NITTANY VALLEY EDUCATIONAL Drove to Public Worked at ATTAINMENT COMPARISON Work Carpooled Transportation Walked Other Home Bellefonte 73.3% 13.5% 2.7% 8.3% 0.5% 1.6% % Bachelor's % High School Benner 87.5% 8.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.8% Degree or Graduate or Marion 78.8% 11.8% 0.0% 2.1% 0.0% 7.3% Higher Higher Spring 84.1% 9.2% 0.1% 2.8% 0.8% 3.0% Walker 83.0% 11.0% 0.2% 1.7% 1.1% 3.0% U.S. 24.4% 80.4% Nittany Valley 81.1% 10.8% 0.8% 3.7% 0.6% 3.0% Pennsylvania 22.4% 81.9% Nittany Valley 18.3% 82.2% TRAVEL TIME TO WORK 30.0 LABOR FORCE POPULATION 25.0 Not in In Labor Labor 20.0 Force s Force e t u 15.0 Bellefonte 3,240 1,932 n i M Benner 1,850 2,754 10.0 Marion 512 188 Spring 3,356 1,454 5.0 Walker 1,769 767 0.0 Nittany Valley 10,727 7,095 Bellefonte Benner Marion Spring Walker Centre County Prepared by the Centre County Planning & Community Development Office, 2008 Source: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • HAINES TOWNSHIP Centre County and Pennsylvania
    HAINES TOWNSHIP Centre County, Pennsylvania CO~WEHENSIVEPLAN Prepared for: HAINES TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS and HAINES TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION Prepared by: RICHARD C. SUTTER & ASSOCIATES, INC. Comprehensive Plannersaand PlannersMistoric Preservation Planners The Manor House, PO Box 564 Hollidaysburg, Pennsylvania 16648 1997 December 3 1, 1997 Haines Township Board of Supervisors Star Route #46 Woodward, Pennsylvania 16882 Attention: Mr. Ray Decker, Chairman RE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR HAINES TOWNSHIP, CENTRE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Ladies and Gentlemen: We are pleased to be in the position to transmit to you the COMPREHENSIVE PLAN for Haines Township, Centre County, Pennsylvania. The Comprehensive Plan is comprised of two (2) phases: PHASE I, BACKGROUND STUDIES and PHASE 11, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. The COMPREHENSIVE PLAN represents a cooperative effort by the Haines Township Planning Commission and the general citizenry of the township, with the technical assistance of Richard C. Sutter & Associates, Comprehensive PlannerdLand Planners/Historic Preservation Planners over the past several years. It is our sincere hope that this COMPREHENSIVE PLAN will act as a guide for everyday planning and development decisions and for guiding the hture orderly growth and development of the nunicipality . Speaking on behalf of my associates and me, we have thoroughly enjoyed this most interesting and challenging project. If throughout the course of the coming years our firm can be of additional assistance to you, kindly feel free to call upon us. With best personal regards. Very truly yours, RICHARD C. SUTTER & ASSOCIATES, INC. storic Preservation Planners / President xc: Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development (DCED) Haines Township Planning Commission RICHARD C. SUlTER and ASSOCIATES Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Elementary, Mi Ad High School, Teacher
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 236 103 SO 015 150 TITLE Resources for Pennsylvania Studies:Elementary and Secondary School Grades. Revised. INSTITUTION Pennsylvania State Dept. of Education, Harrisburg. PUB DATE Sep 83 1, NOTE 37p. PUB TYPE Reference Materials - Bibliographies,(131) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Annotated Bibliographies; Books; Educational Resources; Elementary Secondary,Education;Films; Filmstrips; Instructional Materials; Resource Materials; *Social Studies; *State History;Visual Aids IDENTIFIERS *Pennsylvania ABSTRACT Secondary source materials on Pen lvania history are cited in this selectedbibliography for use in t e elementary and secondary grades. Materials, dated from 1914through 1982, include texts, fiction and nonfiction books, m azines, teaching guides, kits, and audiovisual materials liste alphabetically under the following headings: elementary, mi a dhigh school, teacher resources, instructional media, p- dicals, and juvenile fiction. Entries are annotated except whey he title is self-explanatory. Because this compilation is intended as abasis for further study, the reader is directed to several moreextensive bibliographies. (LP) .0 / 5) *********************************************************************** * Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that canbe made * * * from the original document. ***********************************************************************\ fotAl_.%ro'11,1000Vl* Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Dick Thornburgh, Governor Department of Educatioq Robert C. Wilburn, Secretary
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal/County/Local Governmental Immunity and Tort Liability in All 50 States
    MATTHIESEN, WICKERT & LEHRER, S.C. Hartford, WI ❖ New Orleans, LA ❖ Orange County, CA ❖ Austin, TX ❖ Jacksonville, FL Phone: (800) 637-9176 [email protected] www.mwl-law.com MUNICIPAL/COUNTY/LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY AND TORT LIABILITY IN ALL 50 STATES “Governmental immunity” concerns itself with the various legal doctrines or statutes that provide municipalities, local government entities, and political subdivisions immunity from tort-based claims, as well as exceptions from and limitations to that immunity. Generally, a state government is immune from tort suits by individuals under the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Local governments, municipalities (cities), counties, towns, and other political subdivisions of the state, however, are immune from tort suits by virtue of governmental immunity. This is because the state grants them immunity, usually in the state’s Constitution. This chart deals with governmental immunity and liability of municipal, county, and local government in all 50 states. It should be noted that lawsuits against local governmental entities, their officers, and employees are frequently asserted under federal law, e.g., 42 U.S.C. § 1983, or other similar statutes. This chart deals only with the separate body of law governing claims against local governments. It does not cover federal claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) (28 U.S.C. § 2674) or claims of negligence against state governments, the latter of which is the subject of another chart that can be found HERE. The broader doctrine of sovereign immunity traces its common law origins to the notion that the king made the laws, and thus anything the king did was perforce legal.
    [Show full text]
  • CUMBERLAND Winter 2007 Volume Twenty-Four County History Number Two
    CUMBERLAND Winter 2007 Volume Twenty-four County History Number Two In This Issue Richard C. and Paul C. Reed Architectural Collection Kristen Otto Churchtown Perspectives- 1875 Merri Lou Schaumann The Cow Pens janet Taylor A Murder in the James Hamilton House Susan E. Meehan Basket Ball- Carlisle Indians Triumphant john P. Bland Book Review Fear-Segal, White Man's Club: Schools, Race, and the Struggle of Indian Acculturation Reviewed by Cmy C. Collins Notable Acquisitions, Hamilton Library- July through December 2007 Board of Directors Contributions Solicited William A. Duncan, Pres ident The editor invites articles, no res, or docu­ JeffreyS. Wood, Vice President menrs on rhe history of C umberl and Counry Deborah H. Reitzel, Secretary and irs people. Such articles may deal wirh D avid Goriry, Treasurer new areas of research or m ay review what has been wrirren and published in the pasr. Nancy W Bergen Manuscripts should be typed double­ Bill Burnerr spaced . Citations should also be double­ James D. Flower, Jr. George Gardner spaced; rhey should be placed at the end of Georgia Gish rhe texr. Electronic submiss ions should be Homer E . H enschen in Word format wirh any sugges ted graphics Ann K. Hoffer digitized. Linda Mohler Humes Authors should follow the rules set our in Steve Kaufman rhe Chicago Manual ofStyle. Earl R. Kell er Queries concerning the content and form Virginia LaFond Robert Rahal of contributions may be sent ro rhe Editor ar Rev. Mark Scheneman rhe Sociery. Hilary Simpson Membership and Subscription Publications Committee The bas ic annual membership fee of rhe JeffreyS.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Port Authorities Law
    Municipal Port Authorities Law 40:68A-29. Short title This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Municipal Port Authorities Law." P.L. 1960, c. 192, § 1, eff. Feb. 15, 1961. 40:68A-30. Declaration of public interest and policy It is hereby found that there exists a lack of adequate port facilities available for public use in municipalities in, along or through the territory of which a navigable river flows and it is hereby declared to be in the public interest and to be the policy of the State to foster and promote by all reasonable means the establishment and development of port facilities in municipalities in, along or through the territory of which a navigable river flows and thereby bettering the public health, welfare and convenience and increasing the availability of proper port facilities which cannot be adequately secured except by exercise of the powers of government. It is the purpose and object of this act to further and implement such policy by (1) Authorizing municipalities in, along or through the territory of which a navigable river flows by means and through the agency of a municipal port authority, to acquire, construct, maintain, operate, improve or lease public port facilities; (2) Authorizing the making of charges for the use or the services of such facilities, and providing for the establishment, collection and enforcement of such charges; (3) Creating as bodies corporate and politic municipal port authorities to have full responsibility and powers with respect to such facilities and the establishment, collection,
    [Show full text]