DOCSLIB.ORG

Sustainability Statement Including Post Consultation Update Appendix C2 – Cultural Heritage a Report by Temple-RSK for HS2 Ltd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sustainability Statement Including Post Consultation Update Appendix C2 – Cultural Heritage a Report by Temple-RSK for HS2 Ltd High Speed Rail: Phase 2b Preferred Route Sustainability Statement including Post Consultation Update Appendix C2 – Cultural Heritage A report by Temple-RSK for HS2 Ltd November 2016 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 2. SCOPE AND METHOD ........................................................................................................ 1 2.1. Scope of the appraisal ............................................................................................... 1 2.2. Methodology .............................................................................................................. 1 2.3. Use of sources .......................................................................................................... 2 2.4. Evaluation criteria ...................................................................................................... 2 2.5. Assumptions and limitations ...................................................................................... 3 3. FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................. 5 3.1. Western Leg .............................................................................................................. 5 3.2. Eastern Leg ............................................................................................................. 19 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1.1. This report has been prepared to support the HS2 Sustainability Statement including Post Consultation Update, a report which describes the extent to which the Government’s preferred scheme for HS2 Phase Two supports objectives for sustainable development. This document is a technical appendix which summarises the methodology adopted and conclusions of the Cultural Heritage appraisal, informing the Sustainability Statement main report. The Sustainability Statement places emphasis on the known key impacts only at this stage in the design, prior to commencing the Environmental Impact Assessment. 2. SCOPE AND METHOD 2.1. Scope of the appraisal 2.1.1. The Cultural Heritage appraisal focused on five types of heritage asset. Scheduled Monuments, Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas are three of the five designated asset types and all three are protected by primary legislation. Registered Parks and Gardens (RPGs) and Battlefields are also designated heritage assets; however, these are not offered the same protection by statute. 2.1.2. The reasons for the exclusion of other assets of archaeological and heritage interest are set out in the ‘Assumptions and Limitations’ section below. 2.2. Methodology 2.2.1. Due to the strategic nature of the appraisal, the Appraisal of Sustainability (AoS) adopted a suite of study areas to capture an understanding of the potential heritage assets that could be impacted. This included the following, with distances measured from the edge of the extent of the proposed operational earthworks: Registered Battlefields and Registered Parks and Gardens within 1km; Conservation Areas within 500m; and Listed Buildings and Scheduled Monuments within 350m. 2.2.2. There are a small number of designated assets that lie within expansive and open landscapes outside of these study areas and these assets could be sensitive to some forms of change. These comprised Bolsover Castle, Towton Battlefield and Hickleton Hall. Therefore these assets have been included within the appraisal. 2.2.3. Impacts arising from the operational footprint of the preferred route (including stations and depots) were considered. These were divided into two categories, direct impacts and setting impacts. Direct impacts arise from physical impacts to the asset. Setting impacts arise from changes to the surroundings of an asset which contribute to its heritage significance and changes to the way in which significance is experienced. This appraisal has not considered impacts that may arise from construction works and other associated ancillary works. Page 1 2.3. Use of sources 2.3.1. Geospatial digital mapping data and associated text descriptions on Listed Buildings, Scheduled Monuments, Registered Battlefields and Registered Parks and Gardens (RPGs) were derived from Historic England. 2.3.2. The Conservation Area boundaries were obtained from the relevant local planning authorities and digitised by the project team in order to create mappable GIS data. 2.3.3. Further information on the significance of heritage assets was obtained from readily accessible on-line sources which typically comprised Conservation Area Appraisals and Conservation Management Plans for RPGs. 2.3.4. More detailed Scheduled Monument descriptions were available on-line through the National Heritage List for England maintained by Historic England. For some assets, the list contained only the briefest of descriptions - or occasionally no substantive data at all - and in these cases the data was augmented by on-line Historic Environment Records held by County or Unitary authorities. Additional information on battlefields was gathered through the website of The Battlefield Trust. 2.3.5. The key source of information for appraising the potential impacts on both heritage and archaeological assets was the GIS mapping. The preferred route, including earthworks data and route buffers, were supplied by HS2 Ltd in a GIS format. Buffers for the 350m, 500m and 1km study areas boundaries were created to help capture the relevant information. 2.3.6. Plan and profile drawings for the route alignments were also made available to support the appraisal process, to better understand how the proposed route would change the landscape and townscapes. On-line aerial images, Google ‘streetviews’ and specific images of heritage assets were also used to assist the appraisal, alongside site visits to selected locations. 2.4. Evaluation criteria 2.4.1. Section 3 of this Appendix lists and describes all of the designated heritage assets that lie within the study areas referred to in Section 2-2. The potential impacts are presented for the western and eastern legs respectively, south to north in terms of each heritage designation. 2.4.2. For the purposes of this appraisal a simple four tiered approach to presenting the scale of impacts has been adopted. These adverse impacts comprise Major, Moderate, Minor and No Impact, as summarised in Table 2-1. Table 2-1 – Cultural Heritage Evaluation Scale Scale of Example description of impact adverse impact Major A change such that the significance of the asset is totally altered or destroyed (e.g. demolition of a structure). A comprehensive change to the setting of an asset affecting its significance such that relevant elements of its historic context can no longer be experienced or understood. Moderate A change that adversely affects key elements of the significance of a heritage asset. Changes to the setting of an asset that compromises our ability to experience or understand its significance. Page 2 Scale of Example description of impact adverse impact Minor A change that affects the significance of a heritage asset, such as one that perceptibly alters part (or parts) of its setting. Although the nature of this change will affect the way in which its significance is experienced, our ability to understand its historical context is unaffected. No impact1 The change will not result in any impact on the significance of the asset or the way in which it is experienced. 2.4.3. The adoption of a methodology that focuses on the impacts of the change on the significance of heritage assets ensures that a far more robust appraisal is presented than one that is derived purely from associating the scale of impact with the proximity of the scheme to the asset. Some heritage assets that lie relatively close to the scheme can be unaffected (or have only a minor impact), while greater impacts can come to heritage assets that lie further afield from the scheme but where the change is directed towards its significance. This approach is aligned with industry good practice. 2.4.4. The main report of the AoS focuses on those heritage assets that are likely to be most greatly affected by the preferred route (those that are appraised as being Major or Moderate impacts). 2.5. Assumptions and limitations Assumptions 2.5.1. It was assumed that there would be no impact on any heritage assets located along the line of the scheme where the route was within bored tunnel. It has been assumed that no substantive impacts would arise from vibration or settlement. 2.5.2. It was assumed that the Conservation Area datasets received is up to date. Limitations 2.5.3. Inevitably given the strategic nature of the AoS process, the appraisal is relatively high level and should not be confused with a full and detailed environmental impact assessment. The level of detail of the appraisal is commensurate with the data available and the strategic nature of the preferred route. Work has relied primarily on desk study supported by a number of site visits. 2.5.4. It was not always possible to make a robust appraisal of the impacts on a heritage asset using available on-line imagery. Aerial imagery only presents a single perspective of the landscape / townscape and not one that forms a meaningful contribution to the understanding of the ‘experience’ of an asset. Google Streetview images do not cover all roads, particularly minor roads or lanes can be absent; and hedgerows and other built form can often obscured views
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Old Peverel Road
    PANEL 1 Old Peverel Road Few aspects of landscape history have had more Old Peverel Road, one of which survives in part as an nonsense written about them than roads and unmetalled track in the modern village of Duckmanton trackways. Generations of antiquaries have sought and the other is now part of Markham Lane. These lie to identify stretches of modern road or footpath as to the west of Bolsover and can hardly have been part prehistoric, Roman or medieval, or link references in of a route to South Wingfield. medieval deeds to routes on the ground. In fact there There is probably enough historical and is generally little evidence for the age of roads in use topographical evidence, as well as local tradition, to today, most of which (apart from those built from accept that there was a road (which may not have scratch since the 18th century) have probably been in followed the same route throughout its history) use since the area through which they pass was first connecting William Peverel’s castle at Bolsover with settled, long before they are mentioned in documents South Wingfield. It was presumably created after the or shown on maps. two manors were granted to Peverel, rather than before In some areas there are established traditions of the Norman Conquest. As a through route it would have roads built for particular purposes in the Middle Ages become redundant once Bolsover and South Wingfield which have since gone out of use. An example of this passed into different hands in the mid-12th century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Peak Forest
    WW GUIDE THE PEAK FOREST AND ASHTON CANALS You begin in urban Manchester – and 21 miles later, you’re in a historic basin in the glorious Peak District, moored up beside a real pub. Richard Fairhurst savours a fine canal journey The Ashton Canal FOR MANY YEARS, THE ASHTON CANAL was synonymous with all that was wrong with urban waterways. The 1896 Oarsman’s Guide was uncompromising: “Its course is entirely through a manufacturing district with the usual unpleasant surroundings. The vapour rising from its waters caused by the factories on the banks, condensing their exhaust Bugsworth steam therein, is sometimes so thick as Basin. to make it diffi cult to see one’s way.” Downloaded by David A Calverley from waterwaysworld.com June 2012 Waterways World 71 WW GUIDE 1 1 Ancoats Lock 1 – By the 1960s, its star had sunk lower note the duplicated still. Though never formally closed, it was chamber. totally unnavigable: its channel dry, its lock-gates rotten or swinging loose. Local councillors and anxious parents demanded its infi lling. Its branches to Stockport and Hollinwood were abandoned, and the main line, like so many industrial urban waterways, looked set to go the same way. What saved it was an idea fi rst hatched in 1965: the Cheshire Ring. Adventurous holidaymakers were beginning to discover the canal system, and circular routes were perfect for a week’s holiday. The Ashton and adjacent canals would provide the ‘missing link’ in one such route. Volunteers from the Peak Forest Canal Society, the Inland Waterways Association, and (latterly) the new Waterway Recovery 2 Group set about bringing the canal back to life.
    [Show full text]
  • Manchester City Centre Third Edition 1:3,500
    Manchester City Centre Third Edition 1:3,500 830 A 831 B 832 C 833 D 834 E 835 F 836 G 837 H 838 J 839 K 840 L 841 M 842 N 843 P 844 Q 845 R 846 S 847 T 848 U 849 V 850 990 VICTORIA STATION APPROACH ANGEL 990 Westminster CANNON Renault FB Arena Point Car Park GMC Fire Service Royal Mail G R Cornerhouse A665 Miller Street LUDGATE B E N D I X S T R E E T E ROLLA ST House Victoria Victoria STREET E Garage Leisuredrive Smithfield Sorting Office B6184 Hotel Car Park T H O M P S O N Training Centre N Eagle MEN Arena Cravans Arena Service Station Braziers Aldridge Inn PCS Station Car Park New Century PH G O U L D E N S T R E E T DRIVE M I L L E R S T R E E T DYCHE STREET Wing Yip Dunlop DAWSON STREET Car Park STREET S T R E E T Thompson Street PH Locksmith NEW MIRABEL STREET W.H.Smith House (Co-op) Beer House A6042 BRIDGEGREENGATE STREET Car Park HODSON ST Greengate Venus MILLGATE Fire Station 1 HUNT'S BANK Ladies Old Bank KENWRIGHT County 1 Cannon Green Court Clothing STREET M A R S H ARecord L L WELLINGTON Samuel Building MAYES STREET COLLIER STREET Crowther CAYGILL STREET Trident STREETOffice STREET WEST KING STREET Greengate WALKER'S Burns Q U E E N BOOND S STREET T R E E T CWS Car Stephen AC LONG Smithfield Car Park Upton Medical House House Dolby LA N E CROFT Redfern Park Project C L O S E B L A C K Autobody HANOVERCentre S S I D Y Hotel Snippers Gents Building ROCHDALE ROAD A Wing Yip Black Friar Car Park C A62 Stuart Repairs Club Addington HATTER PH DUKE STREET A D D I N G T O N Chinese Supermarket 989 House Library REDFERNHolyoake STREET
    [Show full text]
  • Store Street, Manchester
    Store Street, Manchester Watching Brief Planning Ref. 126608/FO/2020 Author(s): Joe Turner BA MSc PCIfA Written Scheme of Investigation December 2020 Store Street, Manchester – Archaeological Watching Brief 1. Introduction This Written Scheme of Investigation (WSI) has been produced by CFA Archaeology on behalf of H20 Urban (NO.2) LLP to detail a programme of archaeological monitoring to be undertaken at Store Street, Manchester during relevant construction work. The scheme comprises the construction of a high-rise residential development which will utilise a piling method and phased levelling of the site. The archaeological watching brief is required per Condition 7 of the approve planning application (126608/FO/2020): ‘No demolition or development shall take place until the applicant or their agents or successors in title has secured the implementation of a programme of archaeological works. The works are to be undertaken in accordance with a Written Scheme of Investigation (WSI) submitted to and approved in writing by Manchester Planning Authority. The WSI shall cover the following: 1. A phased programme and methodology of investigation and recording to include:- an archaeological watching brief 2. A programme for post investigation assessment to include: - production of a final report on the investigation results 3. Deposition of the final report with the Greater Manchester Historic Environment Record. 4. Dissemination of the results of the archaeological investigations commensurate with their significance. 5. Provision for archive deposition of the report and records of the site investigation. 6. Nomination of a competent person or persons/organisation to undertake the works set out within the approved WSI.
    [Show full text]
  • NRA Dioxins and the River Doe Lea
    SJfcr* U>af-<J- (^oalik Si" NRA Dioxins and the River Doe Lea Plain English Report ?"%^hitebrici fA U , 15J , / * » •*« | fJWl&rougl ^ A 671 Lodge \ K V * I \VWestfield iT^S % ' Bo (jht<Xi.fi<ilds •,^:- “ TM ■*Y-*~ 'Srkl' Pnory | ' I X r ^ . , . f y j r % v-----A- - ^ Breck. ••'. VT Fm ; ■* ■ $ 1 3 ester i a ^ __ * ^ v _ Mine I s '*,Barrow Hiui yrc "tci' (dis) I -Wr ' ; l ) r J M o o o f S r ^ , p <o 1 m l j Clowne < y /’ '•‘ .V '-H fT I^X^AtjoWne . Nethertforpe ^ X J n ?il ' ' r«/ ». V Wollingwood W >.".// x«J$®-EY ^ --y] U ^tMiddletrottjiT^^P. - /t fflaw ]w.; : ■■ ■:•$fl x Woodii^eD**^*^^J 08 ’ / 'vf $ P — SnutttuCvood Common f l i p p y \ . -fM Oxcroft i o t | s | x . I M V fEstatej/'-- /# i',V Inkersall , I __w ' he d b „ ? 0 Wi^inWfc*t Elmton p,irk "W eElmt of 153 Brimii-K^on h i%»;••' C o c u r v o a c r X i 166 ! /# / *rJ . - 1 •'fU_vW4_-/Cai Farnsworth > v % - • ■ Limekiln // Fw Field B oU over M oor ^ ,uckn?S y ^ i 4> Lorocourse SL / 407 7 BOLS0VER4 ° I / I - ^ 1!,. f e ^ M Moor________|x ^AlTi^ ^aCo1- Green Town H *5 Fo ‘ <to * /7 °T~Si/^tonWoo~d^°^-trf Sprmot /,- 94 1I \X 3Hn» ru, ,SpdngwC j m J Fm M61 E • i V Roi JUlty u 27 1 GlapweiT 1166 smoor t|VV ■ >\ 148Ji 'l (%\x\ Vy Heath' Lanes ^ *1* \ , , o , r j 5 V -'■• 1 >5A ^ C hapel/ PH 5 .
    [Show full text]
  • Michelle Smith Eversheds LLP Bridgewater Place Water Lane
    Michelle Smith Our Ref: APP/R1010/A/14/2212093 Eversheds LLP Bridgewater Place Water Lane LEEDS LS11 5DR 12 March 2015 Dear Madam TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 (SECTION 78) APPEAL BY ROSELAND COMMUNITY WINDFARM LLP: LAND EAST OF ROTHERHAM ROAD, BOLSOVER, DERBYSHIRE APPLICATION REF: 12/00159/FULEA 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of the Inspector, Paul K Jackson BArch (Hons) RIBA, who held a public local inquiry which opened on 4 November 2014 into your client’s appeal against the decision of Bolsover District Council (the Council) to refuse planning permission for a windfarm comprising 6 wind turbines, control building, anemometer mast and associated access tracks on a site approximately 2.5km south of Bolsover between the villages of Palterton and Shirebrook, in accordance with application reference 12/00159/FULEA, dated 25 April 2012. 2. On 20 June 2014 the appeal was recovered for the Secretary of State's determination, in pursuance of section 79 of and paragraph 3 of Schedule 6 to the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, because it involves a renewable energy development. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 3. The Inspector recommended that the appeal be dismissed and planning permission refused. For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s conclusions except where indicated otherwise, and agrees with his recommendation. A copy of the Inspector’s report (IR) is enclosed. All references to paragraph numbers, unless otherwise stated, are to that report.
    [Show full text]
  • Manchester Urban Historic Landscape Characterisation Section 7
    7 Manchester’s Historic Character – Analysis and Recommendations 7.1 Unenclosed land broad type Figure 4 The area of the former Shadow Moss is indicated by the distinctive field boundary patterns depicted on OS 6” 1 st edition mapping of c1882 Description This character type comprises areas that are currently of low economic value and where there is little or no settlement. It includes marginal land such as open mossland and marsh, and other unimproved land which may nonetheless be exploited, such as common land, pasture and moorland. Unenclosed land only occurs in Manchester district as a previous type. 7.1.1 Open moorland Description and historical context Moorland does not exist as a current type within the Manchester landscape; it appears as a previous type only in the Baguley Moor area. Some areas of the former moorland have not been developed and although their character has changed, they may still contain palaeoenvironmental and archaeological evidence. 27 For example, the playing fields associated with Brookway High School (HLC Ref HGM13548) and the playing fields east of Church Stoke Walk (HLC Ref HGM13842) have both been enclosed from farmland that was formerly moorland. 7.1.2 Mossland Description and historical context Although there is no surviving untouched mossland in Manchester, there were several mosses in the district in the past. Mossland has thus been recorded as a previous rather than a current character type. Like the upland moors, the former lowland mosses were probably enclosed at a relatively late date. The three main former mosses in Manchester are Hough Moss in the area which is now Moss Side and Whalley Range; Shadow Moss, near Moss Nook and Manchester Airport in the south of the district; and White Moss, near Charlestown in the northern part of the district.
    [Show full text]
  • D534 LA10 Tibshelf to Shuttlewood (Midlands)
    June 2018 | www.hs2.org.uk In your area Tibshelf to Shuttlewood | LA10 LA10 to Leeds High Speed Two (HS2) is the Government’s planned M1 Shuttlewood new high speed railway. Calow A6192 High Speed Two Limited Arkwright HS2 Phase 2b A632 Town is the company responsible Long Bolsover Duckmanton for developing and A632 Cock Alley Carr Vale promoting the UK’s new Scarcliffe Sutton Scarsdale high speed rail network. In Palterton Temple July 2017, the Government Normanton A617 Stony confi rmed the route for Heath Grassmoor Houghton Holmewood Glapwell the next phase of HS2: North New Wingfield Doe Lea Crewe – Manchester and Stainsby Houghton A617 A6175 West Midlands – Leeds Rowthorne (Phase 2b). Hardwick Hall Hardstoft Teversal Skegby Tibshelf Stanton Hill N to Birmingham Introduction This information has been produced by HS2 Ltd to update you about the route from Tibshelf to Shuttlewood. It includes: • a summary of the proposed route in your area and how the design has developed since July 2017; • what we are currently working on and what we will be consulting on later in the year; • the benefi ts that HS2 will bring to your area; • how to fi nd out more about the project; and • how to get in touch with us. Page 1 of 8 The route of the proposed scheme from Tibshelf to Shuttlewood The route follows the M1 corridor from Tibshelf Services to Woodthorpe Road at Shuttlewood. The Tibshelf to Shuttlewood community area covers approximately 14km of the route beginning at the parish boundary between Blackwell and Tibshelf to the east of the M1, passing northwards beneath the B6014 Mansfield Road before crossing beneath the M1 to the west side of the motorway.
    [Show full text]
  • Pride Shuttle Services and Bus Departure Points 2019
    T EE STR N TIO Y RA A PO G W OR Temporary bus arrangements T C D ITY U RIN A C T 6 IE 6 5 S Manchester Pride Parade, T T R S E E N Sorting Office T IO T Saturday 24 August 11am – 6pm 4 Visit www.tfgm.com A Manchester A 66 5 R Co-op A Arena 6 O Building P Parade starts at 12 noon from Liverpool Road for further details A Victoria R N O C G Station E D L A O ANGEL S R 2 T 4 SQUARE R Victoria 0 E LE T 6 E H Fire Station T A O Shuttlebus 1 Piccadilly (Stop S) to the Aquatics Centre/Oxford Road A D M M H V I C P I L S C L O O T ER R N O Shuttlebus 2 Piccadilly Gardens (Stop P) to Shudehill Interchange NK R A IA B E S S T T A S E N T T U A G T H L R N T L E Shuttlebus 3 Piccadilly (Stop S) to Deansgate station I I E A O New M E E N L T R Century A T S P S House T P R Shudehill Interchange R H A E O N CIS E A B O A V T L G E D C R Tower A N (StandD B) H O C L L I S Y K T N E R A F E G E V T R T Scale 1 : 3700 W E A AT I LG O A Chetham's IL R 2 T N R M 6 O S G School BA A L 36, 37, 38 D L O D O of Music H 0 100 200 yards N A G N N T S O E N V S T O S ER T E O I T L Shuttlebus 2 D R R L RE ST S R T T ET IL E A 0 100 200 metres O S W E O A T A H R D S E A T R CT National D N T U O U D S Football Shudehill H Crowne Plaza IA P Cinema S M V Hotel Museum R Interchange HA Y A CATHEDRAL O I D T L I R GARDENS C O N I O R T Travelshop Holiday Inn T C Manchester I The Printworks Express S V V Cathedral T IC R T E PEL O E Lever Street HA R Corn Exchange T C I W Shudehill A I (Stop EM) T B H Centre for Chinese R Y Contemporary Art T S H T G L O Manchester
    [Show full text]
  • Pennine Link· Huddersfield C.Anal Society Officers
    NUMBER 35 JULY 1980. PENNINE LINK· HUDDERSFIELD C.ANAL SOCIETY OFFICERS. Chairman (E) Dr. Chris F.arrar, 1 Stillwaters 1 Wall Royd; Denby Dale, Hudds. Hudds. 862329 Vice Chairman (W)Peter Freeman, 14, Burnell Court, Heyt·mod, Lanes. Heywood 64468 Treasurer (E) David L. Finnis, 99 Scar Lll.tle, Milnsbridge. Secretary (E) Robert Dewey, 28, Cinderhills Road, Holmfirth, Nr. Bildds. Holmfirth 5022. COIVfMITTEE Colin Chadwick (w) 14, Simmondley New Road,Glossopt West Side Chairman Glossop 64031. Mrs. Diane Charlesworth (E) 1Bank Stone' Lingards Road, Editor Slaithwaite. Hudds. 842181 Trevor Ellis (E) 20; Batley Ave., Marsh, Hudds. Huddersfield 34666. · John Fryer (E) 14, Town End, Golcar; Hudds. Imddersfield 45311 (Work & Home) Graham Maskell (w) 19, Quick View, Mossley, Lancs. l>1ossley 3992 John Maynard (E) 29 t Thick Hollins Drive, Mel tham Huddersfield 850575 David Milsom (E) 194, Huddersfield Roadt Mel tham Huddersfield. 850032 David Sumner (W) 3,6, Fold Crescent, Carrbrook; Stalybridge. Mossley 2860 Les Winhard (W) 3, Fearnlea Ave., Chadderton, Publicity Officer Oldham. 061-633-2690 NON COMMITTEE .MEMBERS. Membership Secretary (E) Mrs. Valerie Dewey (See Secretary) Sales Officer (w) .Mrs. Jean Buckley, 37; Edward St.; Oldham 061-624-4881 West Side Secraary Phil Ritchie, 19 Delamere Avenue, Salford, 6., East Side Secretary Sue Sykes, 99, Scar Lane, ' ' M1lnsbridge Hudds. 659838 East Side Chairman Brian Badminton; 16, Spinkfield Road, Birkby Hudds.45779 E = East W= West PENNINE LINK. THE JOURNAL OF THE HUDDERSFIELD CANAL SOCIETY. NO. 35 JULY 1980. Editor Mrs_ Diane Charlesworth Typing Mrs. Sue Gibson Collating and distributing East & West Side Members CHAIRMAN'S REMARKS. Although we are now well into the sixth year of the Society's existence this period repres£mts something of transition between Society and Limited Company, and something of a holding period between the disolution of Parliament and the next general election.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Bounded by Store Street Great Ancoats
    List No. MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL REPORT FOR RESOLUTION COMMITTEE PLANNING AND HIGHWAYS DATE 13 September 2007 SUBJECT 081261/FO/2006/C3 Demolition of existing buildings and erection of two buildings, comprising one 35-storey tower (with 325 residential units, use class C3, and ground and first floor retail and office spaces, use classes Al & B1) and one 6-storey building (with 58 residential units, use class C3,and ground floor retail and office spaces use classes A1 & B1). With associated public open space, landscaping, access and basement parking. LOCATION Land Bounded By Store Street, Great Ancoats Street And Millbank Street Ancoats APPLICANT Time And Tide Homes And Stephen Price C/o Agent AGENT How Planning 40 Peter Street Manchester M2 5GP REPORT OF HEAD OF PLANNING PURPOSE OF REPORT To describe the above application for planning permission, the issues involved and to put forward recommendations. RECOMMENDATION: The Head of Planning therefore recommends that the Committee be MINDED TO APPROVE planning application 081261/FO/2006/C3 relating to demolition of existing buildings and erection of two buildings, comprising one 35-storey tower (with 325 residential units, use class C3, and ground and first floor shop and office spaces, use classes A1 & B1) and one 6-storey building (with 58 residential units, use class C3,and ground floor retail and office spaces use classes A1 & B1). With associated public open space, landscaping, access and basement parking. for the reasons set out in this report. Financial Consequences for the Revenue Budget There are no financial consequences for the Revenue Budget. Financial Consequences for the Capital Budget There are no financial consequences for the Capital Budget.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Manchester Canals Heritage Partnership Agreement
    GREATER MANCHESTER CANALS HERITAGE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT Revised 2014 21.5.14 1 Review- 21/05/2014 Greater Manchester Canals Heritage Partnership Agreement EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Greater Manchester Canals Heritage Partnership Agreement (HPA) is intended to improve the management of heritage assets upon the various Canal & River Trust (CRT) canals situated within the Greater Manchester area. It is intended that the HPA, which brings together the principles of existing CRT heritage guidance and processes will provide reassurance for local planning authorities (LPA’s) and stakeholders that works of repair are completed to a high conservation standard. The canals within Greater Manchester are a multi-designated historic environment that contains high value heritage assets. These assets include archaeological remains, working heritage, listed buildings and conservation areas and are subject to ongoing development and maintenance. The HPA is designed to reduce bureaucracy, save time on consent procedures and embed effective heritage management within the corporate culture of CRT by increasing both accountability and self-regulation. The HPA is based around a traffic light system of agreed works that are categorised in terms of requiring consent (red) or clearance (amber) or are permitted works (green). The partners of the Greater Manchester Canals HPA are: Canal & River Trust (the main landowner), English Heritage, Bolton Council, Bury Metropolitan Borough Council, Manchester City Council, Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council, Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council, Salford City Council, Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council, Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council, Wigan Council and the Greater Manchester Archaeological Advisory Service (GMAAS). The HPA will run for a period of five years and shall be subject to annual monitoring and review by the partners, with the potential for further extension at the discretion of the partners.
    [Show full text]