Phenotypic Plasticity and Population Genetic Structure in a Wild Vertebrate Population

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Phenotypic Plasticity and Population Genetic Structure in a Wild Vertebrate Population Phenotypic plasticity and population genetic structure in a wild vertebrate population Daniel H. Nussey Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Edinburgh October 2005 Declaration: I have composed this thesis. All analyses presented this thesis are my own work, with the exception of the spatial autocorrelation analysis presented in Figure 5.3 and discussed through Chapter 5, which was performed by Dr Dave Coltman. This work has not been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. Acknowledgements: I'll begin by expressing my immense thanks to Loeske Kruuk, my supervisor, for her instruction, support and encouragement throughout my Ph.D. Loeske somehow managed to balance insightful and careful commentary on all the work I've done with genuine kindness and support whenever it was needed. I cannot imagine how I could possibly have been supervised better. I'm also extremely grateful to have had the support of Josephine Pemberton, as a second supervisor, and Steve Albon, as a CASE supervisor. Josephine's academic support has been much appreciated, particularly during Loeske's maternity leave. Steve's contribution to the plasticity work has improved the quality and rigour of the analyses presented here immensely. I've learnt a great deal from both of you. Thanks also to NERC for funding my time in Edinburgh, and to CEH Banchory and the Macaulay Institute which have provided CASE funding. None of the work presented here would be possible without the vision of Tim Clutton-Brock in Cambridge, in starting up and managing the Kilmory deer project, or without the hard work and skill of Fiona Guinness and all the Kilmory field research assistants. I am especially grateful to Ali Donald and Sean Morris, the present and previous field researchers for the deer project on Rum, for everything they've taught me about deer and how to go about doing fieldwork properly, and for all the great times I've had on Rum during these three years. Comments and support from Tim Clutton-Brock, Tim Coulson and Dave Coltman have been instrumental in much of the work presented in this thesis. Ian Stevenson's remarkable red deer database has almost certainly shaved months off the date of this thesis' submission. I owe a great many people in Josephine's lab thanks too: Kate Byrne helped me find my feet in the lab when I first arrived, and Barbara Wimmer, Floss Jones, Silvia Perez-Espona and Dario Bernaldi have always been on hand whenever my ignorance of all things molecular has become too apparent. I have to thank Key Connaghan, Keith Allan and Jon Slate for red deer DNA extractions which I managed to steal over the course of my PhD. The work in this thesis has also benefited immensely from discussion with David Elston, Dany Garant, Jon Brommer, Anne Charmantier, and Alastair Wilson. And thanks to everyone at the Netherlands Institute of Ecology, particularly Erik Postma, Phillip Gienapp, Kate Lessels and Marcel Visser, for putting up with me for a month and for many stimulating discussions about my work. On a more personal note, I'd like to thank my parents for their unwavering support. I've had an incredible time during my three years in Edinburgh, and that's really down to the fantastic bunch of people I've spent that time with. First, to Eva Jacobs: thanks for all your kindness and support in the two-and-a-half years we shared in Edinburgh. And a huge thank you to Ron Nussey, Sapna Patel, Steve Roe, Key Connaghan, Kate Henderson, Becky Coe, Helen Simcox, Floss Jones, Culum Brown, Alastair Wilson, Arnie Fulton, Darren Obbard, Jamie Moore, Tracey Reynolds, Kath Baldock, Kathy Foerster, Chloe Scott, and Louisa Tempest for their valued friendship and the great times shared over the last three years. And finally, thanks to Sarah Reece for making these last few weeks of thesis writing - my PhD's "death zone" supposedly - some of the best I can remember. Abstract: My thesis focuses on maternal phenotypic plasticity in two neonatal traits and population genetic structure at different spatial scales in a wild red deer (Cervus elaphus) population on the Isle of Rum, Scotland. Life history plasticity represents a vital mechanism allowing populations to respond rapidly to environmental change, yet it is rarely examined in natural settings. At the same time, fine-scale genetic structure may lead to spatial variation in evolutionary potential or kin selection within natural populations. Empirical exploration of the presumably dynamic relationship between ecological or demographic processes and spatial genetic patterns in wild vertebrates is lacking. In the five data chapters comprising my thesis I present analyses and discussion of life-history plasticity in female red deer on Rum; I also document fine-scale spatial genetic patterns across the population and link these to ecology, demography and recent human management practices. Specifically, I present: An analysis of offspring birth weight - spring temperature plasticity in female red deer using linear regression to measure individual reaction norms. I found evidence of variation in plasticity between females and show that early experiences of high population density reduce female plasticity. The description of a mixed-effects linear model approach to analysing phenotypic plasticity from a reaction norm perspective, and application of this model to birth date in the Rum deer population. I use the model to examine variation in phenotypic plasticity between females and selection on plasticity at different population density levels. An examination of population history and structure in red deer from across the Isle of Rum using mitochondrial DNA and microsatellite markers. Analysis revealed that deer in this introduced population came from geographically isolated ancestral populations, and there was genetic evidence for strongly male-biased dispersal. Recent management practices on the island may have led to spatial variation in effective male dispersal on Rum. A comparison of fine-scale spatial genetic structure between male and female deer in the North Block study area using microsatellite markers and census data. There was evidence of structure at extremely fine spatial scales amongst females but not males, and a decline in the structure amongst females over time. I relate this change in female spatial genetic structure to concurrent changes in population size and mating system. An analysis of the spatial distribution of different mtDNA haplotypes in male and female red deer across the North Block. There was evidence for spatial structuring of haplotypes in both sexes. Table of Contents: 1 General Introduction 1 1.1 The evolutionary ecology of phenotypic plasticity 2 1.2 Spatial genetic structure in wild mammal populations 11 1.3 The study population 16 1.4 The objectives of this thesis 22 2 Constraints on plastic responses to climate 24 variation in red deer 2.1 Summary 24 2.2 Introduction 25 2.3 Methods 27 2.4 Results 29 2.5 Discussion 31 3 Phenotypic plasticity in a maternal trait in red 34 deer 3.1 Summary 34 3.2 Introduction 35 3.3 Methods 43 3.4 Results 49 3.5 Discussion 54 3.6 Conclusions 59 4 The genetic consequences of human 60 management in an introduced island population of red deer 4.1 Summary 60 4.2 Introduction 61 4.3 Methods 67 4.4 Results 75 4.5 Discussion 83 5 Rapidly declining fine-scale spatial genetic 89 structure in female red deer 5.1 Summary 89 5.2 Introduction 90 5.3 Methods 94 5.4 Results 102 5.5 Discussion 110 5.6 Conclusions 113 6 Fine-scale spatial structuring of mtDNA variation 115 in a wild red deer population: the role of ecological conditions and selection on haplotype 6.1 Summary 115 6.2 Introduction 116 6.3 Methods 120 6.4 Results 127 6.5 Discussion 138 6.6 Conclusions 143 7 General Discussion 144 7.1 Maternal life history plasticity in the wild 144 7.2 Spatial genetic structure in a wild mammal population 152 7.3 Final thoughts 159 References 161 184 Appendices 0 A Red deer microsatellite markers 184 B Alignment of red deer mitochondrial control region 186 sequences C Generalised linear mixed effects models for individual 191 fitness traits in red deer D Publications arising from this thesis 195 GENERAL INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1 Chapter 1: General Introduction The dependence of micro-evolutionary dynamics on the environmental conditions experienced by a population is becoming increasing clear from empirical research (Hoffmann and Merila, 1999, Charmantier and Garant, 2005). Long-term individual based studies of wild vertebrate populations have provided an excellent means of assessing the impact of the environment on natural selection and levels of additive genetic variation in a variety of traits (e.g. Coulson et al, 2003, McAdam and Boutin, 2003, Charmantier et al, 2004, Garant et al, 2004, Garant et al, 2005, Wilson et al, 2005c). In this thesis, I use data collected during a long-term study of red deer (Cervus elaphus) on the Isle of Rum, Scotland, to address two important aspects of any vertebrate species' evolutionary ecology: phenotypic plasticity in life history traits and fine-scale spatial genetic structure. Phenotypic plasticity, defined as the ability of a single genotype to express different phenotypes in different environments, represents an important mechanism by which populations can respond rapidly to changes in ecological conditions. Fine scale spatial genetic structure, the non-random distribution of alleles across relatively short geographic distances, can dictate the spatial scale on which selection can act and underpins a population's evolutionary potential. Life history plasticity and fine-scale spatial genetic structure are expected in many vertebrate systems, and recent research interest in these topics has improved 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1 our understanding of when and why they might vary between populations and species (Sugg et al, 1996, Pigliucci, 2001).
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2000
    ST. KILDA SOAY SHEEP PROJECT: ANNUAL REPORT 2000 J.G. Pilkington1+3, S.D. Albon2, W. Amos3, D.W. Coltman1+8, T.H. Clutton- Brock3, T.N. Coulson3, M.J. Crawley4, M.C. Forchhammer3, I. Gordon5, B.T. Grenfell3, M. Hutchings5, A.W. Illius1, O. Jones4+5, L. Kruuk1, J. Lindström3+7, J.M. Pemberton1, B. Preston6, I.R. Stevenson6, K. Wilson6. 1Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh. 2Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Banchory 3Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge. 4Department of Biology, Imperial College, University of London. 5Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Aberdeen. 6Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Stirling. New addresses – 7Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow. 8Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield. POPULATION OVERVIEW..................................................................................................................................... 2 REPORTS ON COMPONENT STUDIES .................................................................................................................... 4 Reproductive energetics of rams, and the maintenance of horn diversity .................................................... 4 Ram behaviour with respect to "favoured" insemination times .................................................................... 5 Sperm depletion in Soay rams....................................................................................................................... 7 Vegetation ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation of Genetic Variance in Fitness, and Inference of Adaptation, When Fitness Follows a Log-Normal Distribution Timothée Bonnet , Michael B
    Journal of Heredity, 2019, 1–13 doi:10.1093/jhered/esz018 THE 2017 AGA KEY DISTINGUISHED LECTURE Advance Access publication June 26, 2019 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jhered/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/jhered/esz018/5523732 by Da-Collect Chifley Library ANUC user on 01 July 2019 THE 2017 AGA KEY DISTINGUISHED LECTURE Estimation of Genetic Variance in Fitness, and Inference of Adaptation, When Fitness Follows a Log-Normal Distribution Timothée Bonnet , Michael B. Morrissey, and Loeske E. B. Kruuk From the Division of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, 46 Sullivans Creek Road, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia (Bonnet and Kruuk); and School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews Fife KY16 9TH, UK (Morrissey). Address correspondence to Timothée Bonnet at the address above, or e-mail: [email protected]. Received November 14, 2018; First decision January 23, 2019; Accepted April 7, 2019. Corresponding Editor: Anne Bronikowski Loeske Kruuk is a professor in the Research School of Biology at the Australian National University. She did a PhD in population genetics at the University of Edinburgh, followed by a postdoc at the University of Cambridge, and then held a Royal Society University Research Fellowship at the University of Edinburgh and an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship at the Australian National University. Her research focuses on evolutionary ecology and quantitative genetics of natural populations, with the aim of understanding how both evolutionary processes and environmental conditions shape diversity in natural populations. She has worked on a range of species, largely but not entirely using long-term studies of wild vertebrate populations with individual-level field data.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Dynamics and Fitness in Wild Populations
    2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproductionEvolutionary even in part is prohibited. dynamics and fitness in wild populations 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited. 2018 © 48th European Contact Lens Society Of Ophthalmologists. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . Loeske Kruuk 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . Charles Darwin, Origin of Species 1859 “ No one supposes that all the individuals of the same species are cast in the same actual mould. These individual differences are of the highest importance for us, 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited. for they are often inherited …and they thus afford materials for natural selection to act on. ” evolutionary change: genetics and selection 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts 2020
    Abstracts 2020 Abstract book sponsored by Talks Page Session 1 …………………………………………………2 Session 2 …………………………………………………3 Session 3 …………………………………………………6 Session 4 …………………………………………………9 Session 5 ………………………………………………..11 Session 6 ………………………………………………..15 Session 7 ………………………………………………..20 Session 8 ………………………………………………..23 Session 9 ………………………………………………..27 Session 10 ………………………………………………..33 Session 11 ………………………………………………..39 Session 12 ………………………………………………..43 Session 13 ………………………………………………..49 Session 14 ………………………………………………..53 Session 15 ………………………………………………..54 Session 16 ………………………………………………..58 Session 17 ………………………………………………..61 Session 18 ………………………………………………..64 Session 19 ………………………………………………..70 Session 20 ………………………………………………..76 Session 21 ……………………………………………… 80 Session 22 ………………………………………………..85 Session 23 ………………………………………………..88 Session 24 ……………………………………………… 91 Session 25 ………………………………………………. 94 Poster Presentations……………………………97-279 1 316 Quantitative Genetics Isn’t Dead Yet Professor Peter M. Visscher1 1Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, ST LUCIA, Australia Session 1, November 3, 2020, 7:00 AM - 8:30 AM Biography: Peter Visscher FRS is a quantitative geneticist with research interests focussed on a better understanding of genetic variation for complex traits in human populations, including quantitative traits and disease, and on systems genomics. The first half of his research career to date was predominantly in livestocK genetics (animal breeding is applied quantitative genetics), whereas the last 15 years he has contributed to methods,
    [Show full text]
  • Building a New Biology
    BUILDING A NEW BIOLOGY School of Biological Sciences 2025 Vision BUILDING A Contents NEW BIOLOGY School of Biological Sciences 2025 Vision Foreword 04 Executive summary 05 CHAPTER 1: Vision for the future 06 1:1 Our School 08 1:2 World-class research 10 1:3 Inspirational teaching 14 1:4 Creative communication 15 1:5 Pioneering innovation 16 1:6 Economic benefits 18 1:7 Global impact 19 CHAPTER 2: Building a new biology 22 2:1 Epigenetics 24 2:2 Infection and global health 25 2:3 Synthetic biology 26 2:4 At the interface 27 CHAPTER 3: A blueprint for growth 28 3:1 Our people 30 3:2 Our culture 33 3:3 Our spaces 34 3:4 Our future impact 36 Conclusion 37 www.ed.ac.uk/schools-departments/biology Foreword Executive summary 1.1 We are poised to deliver We have embarked on an estate re-development project that will The School of Biological Sciences at the University of Edinburgh is Our goals the next revolution in see enhanced integration of our research activities, nurturing the a leading centre for research and teaching with an enviable global biology. Today, biology cross disciplinary collaborations. Some of the exceptional research reach and reputation. For centuries we have generated insights and We have an ambitious long-term vision for our School and by is no longer simply that will arise from novel co-locations in our new buildings can innovations that have benefited the health and wealth of our world. 2025 we aim to: about interrogation and be foreseen, for instance just by browsing the pages here.
    [Show full text]
  • Connect.Share.Transform
    CONNECT. SHARE. TRANSFORM. NATIONAL EVOLUTIONARY SYNTHesIS CenTER 2012 AnnUAL RePORT APPenDIces Table of ConTenTs A. DISCIPLINES OF SUPPORTED PROJECTS IN YEAR 7 B. DEMOGRAPHICS OF PI’S AND CO- ‐PI’S IN YEAR 7 1. GENDER 2. ETHNICITY 3. RaCE 4. NATIONALITY C. DEMOGRAPHICS OF PaRTICIPANTS IN NESCENT ACTIVITIES IN YEAR 7 1. GENDER 2. ETHNICITY 3. RaCE 4. NATIONALITY D. COUNTRIES OF PARTICIPANT INSTITUTIONS E. U.S. STATES OF PaRTICIPANT INSTITUTIONS F. DETAILED LIST OF ACTIVITIES AND PaRTICIPANTS IN YEAR 7 G. PUBLICATIONS FROM NESCENT SUPPORTED PROJECTS IN YEAR 7 H. PRESS ON NESCENT SUPPORTED PROJECTS IN YEAR 7 I. ACTIVE PROJECTS IN YEAR 7 J. PROJECTS SUPPORTED IN YEAR 7 appendix a DISCIPLINES OF SUPPORTED PROJECTS IN YEAR 8 appendix a DISCIPLINES OFOF SSUPPORTEUPPORTEDD P PROJECTSROJECTS IN IN Y EYEARAR 8 8 CENTER PROJECT MEETING FELLOW VISITING TOTAL L W A ENCE D TIC W FELLO RESI L ABBA A VISITOR IN S FELLO MEETING GROUP TE LIST TERM A SIS A OCTOR - TERM ING Y U - D L K A AD T OR A GR W OTHER C JOURN LONG POST SHORT APPLIED EVOLUTION 0 0 2 3 0 1 0 2 0 8 BEHAVIOR OR NEUROBIOLOGY 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 4 2 9 BIODIVERSITY 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY 2 0 3 3 1 0 1 3 7 20 DEVELOPMENT 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 5 EDUCATION 0 0 3 3 1 0 0 0 2 9 EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY OR POPULATION BIOLOGY 1 1 4 9 2 0 4 10 5 36 GENOMICS OR PROTEOMICS 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 1 8 MOLECULAR EVOLUTION 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 7 3 13 PALEONTOLOGY 0 0 0 4 2 0 1 4 3 14 PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OR SPECIATION 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 2 3 20 PHYSIOLOGY OR FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 4 POPULATION OR EVOLUTIONARY
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2003
    ST. KILDA SOAY SHEEP PROJECT: ANNUAL REPORT 2003 J.G. Pilkington1+3, S.D. Albon2, D. Beraldi1, K. Byrne1, D.W. Coltman7, T.H. Clutton-Brock3, T. Coulson4, B. Craig1, M.J. Crawley4, I. Gordon5, J. Gratton7, B.T. Grenfell3, O. Jones4+5, L. Kruuk1, A.F. McRae1, B. Morgan8, D. Nussey1, A. Overall1, J.M. Pemberton1, B. Preston6, J. Slate7, I.R. Stevenson9, G. Tavecchia3, L-J. Tempest6, P.M. Visscher1, A. Wilson1, K. Wilson6, B. Wimmer1. 1Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh. 2Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Banchory. 3Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge. 4Department of Biological Sciences, Imperial College, University of London. 5Macaulay Institute, Aberdeen. 6Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Stirling. 7Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield. 8Institute of Maths and Statistics, University of Kent at Canterbury. 9Sunadal Data Solutions, Edinburgh. POPULATION OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................................... 2 REPORTS ON COMPONENT STUDIES.................................................................................................................... 4 New developments in estimating fitness in the wild ...................................................................................... 4 Investigating reproductive responses of individual Soay ewes to climate conditions................................... 5 Inbreeding and neonatal survival ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]