DOCSLIB.ORG

Floor Debate January 21, 2021 Rough Draft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Floor Debate January 21, 2021 Rough Draft Transcript Prepared by Clerk of the Legislature Transcribers Office Floor Debate January 21, 2021 Rough Draft HILGERS: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the George W. Norris Legislative Chamber for the eleventh day of the One Hundred Seventh Legislature, First Session. Our chaplain for today is Senator Geist. Please rise. GEIST: T hank you, Mr. Speaker. And thank you, colleagues. I'll be reading a prayer this morning that was given to me from a copastor of my church, Mercy City Church here in Lincoln, Pastor Carrie Erikson. Let us pray. Father God, thank you for today. Thank you for the peace and prosperity of our state and of our nation. Today as we gather together, I thank you for the men and women present who have the opportunity to govern our state. I pray that they would choose to honor you and ask for your wisdom and strength to make decisions that reflect your heart for people. Protect each person who is present in this room today that they would be healthy and focused on the task at hand. I come against fear and confusion and pray that your truth would lead and guide this group of people to make decisions that honor you. Your word says that where there is unity, you have-- you command your blessing. And so today we pray that each person's heart would be unified together with yours, that they would see things the way that you do and honor you in word and action. I pray that there would be respect for one another and that they would hear one another with an open heart and mind. Let your will be done and in and through each person present today. Thank you for this room full of people who have been given this great opportunity to lead and be a voice in this season. I pray that today you would-- I pray that today would be pleasing to you and that we would be led by the power of your spirit. In Jesus' name, amen. HILGERS: Thank you, Senator Geist. I call to order the eleventh day of the One Hundred Seventh Legislature, First Session. Senators, please record your presence. Roll call. Mr. Clerk, please record. CLERK: I have a quorum, president, Mr. President. HUGHES: Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Are there any corrections for the Journal? CLERK: I have no corrections at this time. HUGHES: Thank you. Are there any messages, reports, or announcements? CLERK: T here are, Mr. President. Hearing notices from the Health and Human Services Committee, those signed by Senator Arch. New 1 of 73 Transcript Prepared by Clerk of the Legislature Transcribers Office Floor Debate January 21, 2021 Rough Draft resolutions: Senator Geist offers LR32. That will be laid over. Health Committee would like to announce Senator Williams has been selected as the Vice Chair and General Affairs would like to announce that Senator Lowe has been selected as Vice Chair of General Affairs. That's all that I have at this time, Mr. President. HUGHES: Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Senator Albrecht would like to recognize Dr. Dave Hoelting from Pender, Nebraska, who is serving as our family physician of the day. Please rise and be recognized for your Nebraska Legislature. We will now proceed to the first item on the agenda. Mr. Clerk. CLERK: M r. President, Senator Hunt, would move to withdraw LB232. HUGHES: Senator Hunt, you are recognized. HUNT: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, colleagues. As we very well know, sometimes with a bill we don't get it quite right and that was the case with this bill. So I'd appreciate your green vote to allow me to withdraw it. Thank you. HUGHES: Thank you, Senator Hunt. Seeing no one in the queue, the motion to withdraw LB232. All those in favor vote aye; all those opposed vote nay. Record, Mr. Clerk. CLERK: 3 8 ayes, 0 nays, Mr. President, to-- on the motion to withdraw the bill. HUGHES: Thank you. Speaker Hilgers, for an announcement. HILGERS: Thank you, Mr. President. Good morning, colleagues. As promised last week, if you remember my announcement last Friday, I let the body know, as you know, we are going to go into all day hearings starting on Monday. And as I promised last week, I wanted to give the body an update on some of the COVID procedures that we have that we are implementing and putting in place, because everything is going to look a little bit differently. And I wanted to talk a little bit as well about some of the expanded options for the public to be able to testify without actually having to sit in-- in the committee hearing rooms for their own health and safety. And so I want to talk about those briefly. I would announce these on Friday, but I want to give both the body and the public some time to digest these rules and procedures before we come on Monday. So there are two big buckets I'm going to talk about. The first is the procedures within the committees themselves, and the second is going to be the public option. So, 2 of 73 Transcript Prepared by Clerk of the Legislature Transcribers Office Floor Debate January 21, 2021 Rough Draft number one, we have a list and I've worked, by the way, with the Clerk's office, all the standing committee chairs, as well as the staff in the-- id the Speaker's office and Lancaster County Health Department to come up with these procedures. So-- and we've had a lot of input from other members. And I appreciate all-- everyone's help in formulating these. First and foremost from a physical space perspective, as you all, I believe, know, our committee hearing rooms are very-- are going to be limited to-- in order to accommodate social distancing. And so we have procedures to help encourage making sure that the people who are in the hearings are just the people who are going to be testifying on those particular hearings. We're going to designated entrance signs and exit signs. And we're going to-- we're going to make sure on the outside of the committee, committee hearing rooms like we do when people are watching on NET, that people know which bills are being heard to enable us to just have the folks who just need to be there for the-- for their testimony there and then they can leave. Within the hearing rooms, we're going to have the shields that you've seen. We'll have the sanitizers that you've seen. We're going to ask people to limit handouts. And as well, we're going to ask people to wear masks within the committee hearing rooms. In addition, we have, and I've mentioned this, in order to make this work, we're going to have members who are going to have to self-quarantine. And we're going to have members that are likely to be testing positive-- who are going to test positive through the session. In order to make this work, we need to have options for those senators to be able to participate in this process remotely. It's very important. And by the way, if you fall into either of those two camps, you should participate remotely. So if you are quarantining as a member or certainly if you test positive, you should participate remotely. In order to do that, we've set up some procedures to make that happen. Now I want to be really clear that this is only for, this is only for those senators who are quarantining or test positive. This is not for I have a, you know, I can't make it. I just want to be able to call in. That's not how this is going to work. Now we've-- we're providing some logistical procedures to the standing committee chairs. I have an email out to them a little bit later this morning to ensure that if this happens, we have an orderly processing of questions and back and forth. And so we're going to send that to the committee hearing chairs. It's going to really entail-- it's not going to be our conference call system that we've, I think we've used from time to time. That's just not logistically going to work for the volume of hearings and testifiers that we think we're going to have. It's going to be a little bit different system. So we'll send that out to the 3 of 73 Transcript Prepared by Clerk of the Legislature Transcribers Office Floor Debate January 21, 2021 Rough Draft standing committee chairs and look for that in your email before the end of this week. The last thing on the committee procedures, and this is less on a safety procedure, but it's a big picture to help our team. So in order to do the all day committees, I just want to-- committee hearings, I want to be really clear. I think many of you know this, but our committee clerks are really taking on a significant burden. This is a very burdensome process for them to be able to do it. And they are part of our legislative team. And I think it's our responsibility to do what we can to help relieve their burden if we can. So one of the things that I'm asking every member to do is we're going to change the rule and the timeline for providing statements of intent.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Nebraska State Education Association March 2014
    The Voice The Nebraska State Education Association March 2014 SEPTEMBER 2016 | THE VOICE | PAGE 1 #Oct 16 Voice.indd 1 9/26/2016 2:37:40 PM NSEA Comes to Defense of EHA Plan al model and has served Nebraska educators for decades,” he said. Legislative Hearing Investigates Actuary Kevin Dolsky advises the EHA Board of Directors on the health care plan’s management. Dolsky told senators that in each of Moving Teachers to State Coverage the last 10 years, the premium rate increases under the EHA plan have A legislative interim hearing on the health care plan that serves been under 10 percent. For the past six years, the annual increase has more than 80,000 members of Nebraska’s public education family averaged just over three percent. was a learning moment for Nebraska legislators. “That’s just extraordinary in this industry,” he said. The Legislature’s Education Committee listened as a parade of ed- Dolsky also said the EHA’s consistency rate is “extraordinary.” ucators and others voiced support for the Educator’s Health Alliance Consistency rate, he said, is an industry term that measures how plan. No one testified in support of North Platte Sen. Mike Groene's many customers stay with a health care plan. LR586 study to determine the viability of pulling all Nebraska public “Ninety percent is good, and 95 percent would be excellent,” said school employees out of the EHA plan and pro- Dolsky. “But the EHA has 99 percent. That is viding those employees with coverage through just extraordinary.” the State of Nebraska plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Hearing January 27, 2021
    Transcript Prepared by Clerk of the Legislature Transcribers Office Government, Military and Veterans Affairs Committee January 27, 2021 Rough Draft Does not include written testimony submitted prior to the public hearing per our COVID-19 Response protocol BREWER: Good morning, welcome, welcome to the Government, Military and Veterans Affairs Committee. I am Senator Tom Brewer from Gordon, Nebraska, representing the 43rd Legislative District. I serve as the Chair of this committee. Because of the COVID situation, we're going to go through a number of COVID specific things and then we'll get into the Government Committee intro here. For the safety of our committee members, staff, pages, and the public, we ask those attending our hearing to abide by the following procedures. Due to social distancing requirements, seating in the hearing room is limited, very limited. We ask that you only enter the hearing room when it is necessary for you to attend your hearing. The bills will be taken up as posted outside the hearing on the wall. The list will be updated after each hearing to identify which bill is the current bill up, so the number will be up there and then the pages will then post outside. The committees will pause between each bill to allow enough time for the public to move in and move out. Keep in mind that after each testifier, we'll need a slight delay in order to clean the table, clean the chair. So just understand we'll have some pauses. But those pauses are not for senators to start talking because the mikes will be on and it will still be getting recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • State-Of-Judiciary-2021.Pdf
    State of the JUDICIARY 2021 State of Nebraska Chief Justice Michael G. Heavican www.supremecourt.ne.gov Nebraska Supreme Court Michael G. Heavican, Chief Jeffrey J. Funke Lindsey Miller-Lerman Jonathan J. Papik William B. Cassel John F. Freudenberg Stephanie F. Stacy State Court Administrator Corey R. Steel State Probation Administrator Deborah A. Minardi State of the Judiciary 2021 I. INTRODUCTION Mr. President, Mr. Speaker, and Members of the Legislature. Thanks to all of you, particularly Speaker Hilgers, for inviting me to address you this morning. As always, it is an honor for me to report on the accomplishments of our Judicial Branch and to discuss our upcoming plans with you. Although not with me in the Chamber today, my fellow justices are watching on livestream: Justice Lindsey Miller-Lerman of Omaha; Justice William Cassel of O’Neill; Justice Stephanie Stacy of Lincoln; Justice Jeff Funke of Nebraska City; Justice Jonathan Papik, also of Omaha; and Justice John Freudenberg of Rushville. Today I will highlight the activities of Nebraska’s Judicial Branch this past year, including our pandemic response, our access to justice initiatives, what’s new with probation and problem-solving courts, and the Office of Public Guardian. Notwithstanding the current pandemic and other challenges, we have had many successes and accomplishments in 2020 and look forward to 2021. II. THE CONSTITUTION Article I, § 13 of our Constitution states that “[a]ll courts shall be open, and every person, for any injury done him or her . shall have a remedy by due course of law and justice administered without denial or delay.” This means that our courts must remain open, even when much of the rest of society is not.
    [Show full text]
  • True Conservative Or Enemy of the Base?
    Paul Ryan: True Conservative or Enemy of the Base? An analysis of the Relationship between the Tea Party and the GOP Elmar Frederik van Holten (s0951269) Master Thesis: North American Studies Supervisor: Dr. E.F. van de Bilt Word Count: 53.529 September January 31, 2017. 1 You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) Page intentionally left blank 2 You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) Table of Content Table of Content ………………………………………………………………………... p. 3 List of Abbreviations……………………………………………………………………. p. 5 Chapter 1: Introduction…………………………………………………………..... p. 6 Chapter 2: The Rise of the Conservative Movement……………………….. p. 16 Introduction……………………………………………………………………… p. 16 Ayn Rand, William F. Buckley and Barry Goldwater: The Reinvention of Conservatism…………………………………………….... p. 17 Nixon and the Silent Majority………………………………………………….. p. 21 Reagan’s Conservative Coalition………………………………………………. p. 22 Post-Reagan Reaganism: The Presidency of George H.W. Bush……………. p. 25 Clinton and the Gingrich Revolutionaries…………………………………….. p. 28 Chapter 3: The Early Years of a Rising Star..................................................... p. 34 Introduction……………………………………………………………………… p. 34 A Moderate District Electing a True Conservative…………………………… p. 35 Ryan’s First Year in Congress…………………………………………………. p. 38 The Rise of Compassionate Conservatism…………………………………….. p. 41 Domestic Politics under a Foreign Policy Administration……………………. p. 45 The Conservative Dream of a Tax Code Overhaul…………………………… p. 46 Privatizing Entitlements: The Fight over Welfare Reform…………………... p. 52 Leaving Office…………………………………………………………………… p. 57 Chapter 4: Understanding the Tea Party……………………………………… p. 58 Introduction……………………………………………………………………… p. 58 A three legged movement: Grassroots Tea Party organizations……………... p. 59 The Movement’s Deep Story…………………………………………………… p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nebraska Transcript, Spring 2016, Vol. 49 No.1
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln The eN braska Transcript Law, College of Spring 2016 The eN braska Transcript, Spring 2016, Vol. 49 No.1 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebtranscript Part of the Law Commons "The eN braska Transcript, Spring 2016, Vol. 49 No.1" (2016). The Nebraska Transcript. 21. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebtranscript/21 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law, College of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in The eN braska Transcript by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Nebraska RANSCRIPT T University of Nebraska College of Law Former Dean Susan Poser begins new chapter at UIC Also in this issue: Works, Kirst and Lyons retire with combined 123 years of service Pittman appointed to top position in The United Nations Spring 2016, Vol. 49 No. 1 Nebraska Law Table of Contents Spring 2016, Vol. 49 No.1 Dean’s Message 2 Dean’s Message Faculty Updates 4 Works, Kirst & Lyons retirement 6 Faculty Notes Around the College 17 Moberly appointed interim dean 18 Berger, assoicate dean 18 Sullivan joins Law College 19 Beard & Hurwitz named Trailblazers Feature 20 Poser closes UNL chapter Around the College 23 3L gains policy work experience 24 ILSA hosts USPTO’s Morris 25 West African leaders share insight 26 McCoy joins admissions office 27 BYC Boost program 28 Collingsworth, Dean’s roundtable 29 Yale’s Langbein delivers lecture 30 Heiliger, Sheldon at UNK 31 Vinton competes on Jeopardy 32 LL.M., Carns earns promotion 32 Law Team wins Ag Law Quiz Bowl 34 December 2015 commencement Poser ends deanship, service at UNL Our Alumni Susan Poser concluded her time as dean of the College of Law on 36 Curtiss visits Entreprenuership Clinic January 27, 2016, to join the University of Illinois-Chicago as its 37 Pittman promoted to head of chamber provost and senior vice chancellor for academic affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • 30Days of 30Second Prayers
    30 days of second prayers 30 for leaders 1 That they recognize that they are accountable to God for each decision (Prov. 9:10). 2 That they be granted wisdom, knowledge and understanding (Jam. 1:5). 3 That they be presented with the gospel and a loving Christian witness (Ro. 10:14). 4 That, if unsaved, they be drawn to a saving encounter with Christ; that believers would be strengthened and encouraged in their faith (1 Tim. 2:4, Eph. 1:17-23). 5 That they recognize their inadequacy and pray, seeking the will of God (Prov. 3:5-8, Lk. 11:9-13). 6 That they be convicted of sin, transgression, and iniquity (Ps. 51:17, Jn. 8:9). 7 That they heed their conscience, confess their sins, and repent (Prov. 28:13, Jam. 4:8). 8 That they read the Bible and attend prayer meetings and Bible studies (Ps. 119:11, Col. 3:2). 9 That they value and regard the Ten Commandments and the teachings of Christ (Ps. 19:7-11). 10 That they respect and honor their parents (Eph. 6:2-3). 11 That they respect authority and practice accountability (Ro. 13:1-7). 12 That they be given godly counsel and have God-fearing advisors (Prov. 24:6). 13 That they be honest and faithful to their spouse and children (Mal. 2:15-16). 14 That they be practicing members of local congregations (Heb. 10:25). 15 That they desire purity and avoid debauchery, pornography, perversion, and drunkenness (1 Cor. 6:9-20, Titus 2:12).
    [Show full text]
  • Parsing Representative and Representational Democratic Discourse on US Political Blogs
    Bread or Circuses? Parsing Representative and Representational Democratic Discourse on U.S. Political Blogs by Milo Taylor Anderson A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Information Faculty of Information University of Toronto © Copyright by Milo Anderson 2014 Bread or Circuses? Parsing Representative and Representational Democratic Discourse on U.S. Political Blogs Milo Anderson Master of Information Faculty of Information University of Toronto 2014 Abstract This thesis finds empirical support for Jodi Dean's theory of declining symbolic efficiency through a qualitative content analysis of discourse concerning the 2013 U.S. government shutdown on political blogs. Themes of this thesis explore reflexivity, decontextualization, and an erosion of meaning brought about by changing media technologies and practices. Humanistic analyses of media and politics by scholars such as Benkler (2006) and McChesney (1999) are contrasted with works by Gitlin (1980), Postman (1985), and Dean (2010), who see media systems operating outside human control. This study's methodology relies upon Knight and Johnson's (2011) pragmatic justification for democratic institutions. The analysis uses a system of categories to describe statements about political strategy along four dimensions: operant; method of action; operand; and the consequence of the strategy. This study identifies important distinctions between textual descriptions of nominal and instrumental strategy; it is argued that nominal discourse represents
    [Show full text]
  • Senators & Committees
    Select Committees Hearing Rooms Committee on Committees Note: The ongoing replacement of Capitol heating, ventilation and Chair: Sen. Robert Hilkemann; V. Chair: Sen. Adam Morfeld air conditioning equipment requires temporary relocation of certain Senators & 1st District: Sens. Bostelman, Kolterman, Moser legislative offices and hearing rooms. Please contact the Clerk of the 2nd District: Sens. Hunt, Lathrop, Lindstrom, Vargas Legislature’sN Office (402-471-2271) if you have difficulty locating a 3rd District: Sens. Albrecht, Erdman, Groene, Murman particular office or hearing1st room. Floor Enrollment and Review First Floor Committees Chair: Sen. Terrell McKinney Account- ing 1008 1004 1000 1010 Reference 1010-1000 1326-1315 Chair: Sen. Dan Hughes; V. Chair: Sen. Tony Vargas M Fiscal Analyst H M 1012 W 1007 1003 W Members: Sens. Geist, Hilgers, Lathrop, Lowe, McCollister, 1015 Pansing Brooks, Slama, Stinner (nonvoting ex officio) 1402 1401 1016 Rules 1017 1308 1404 1403 1401-1406 1019 1301-1314 1023-1012 Chair: Sen. Robert Clements; V. Chair: Sen. Wendy DeBoer 1305 1018 Security Research 1306 Members: Sens. J. Cavanaugh, Erdman, M. Hansen, Hilgers (ex officio) 1405 1021 1406 Pictures of Governors 1022 Research H H Gift 1302 1023 15281524 1522 E E 1510 Shop Pictures of Legislators Info. 1529-1522 Desk 1512-1502 H E E H Special Committees* 1529 1525 1523 1507 1101 Redistricting 1104 Members: Sens. Blood, Briese, Brewer, Geist, Lathrop, Linehan, Lowe, W Bill Room Morfeld, Wayne 1103 Cafeteria Mail-Copy 1114-1101 1207-1224 Building Maintenance Center 1417-1424 1110 Self- 1107 Service Chair: Sen. Steve Erdman Copies Members: Sens. Brandt, Dorn, Lowe, McDonnell, Stinner W H W M 1113 1115 1117 1423 M 1114 Education Commission of the States 1113-1126 1200-1210 1212 N Members: Sens.
    [Show full text]
  • NE Healthy Kids Summit 2021 Agenda
    2021 Nebraska Healthy Kids Summit Agenda Post-Summit Summary – Links & Resources Promoting Healthy Eating and Active Living in Nebraska Communities Purpose: Explore the impact of the global pandemic and systemic inequities on child nutrition and active living in Nebraska communities, while connecting stakeholders through research, practice, and advocacy approaches that promote equitable child health in a call to action. Wednesday, March 3, 2021 from 12:00-4:30pm CST TIME TOPIC 12:00-12:15 Welcome/Opening Chanda Chacón, MPH, FACHE – President and Chief Executive Officer, Children’s Hospital & Medical Center 12:15-1:15 Be a Voice to Create Equitable Policies for Healthier Communities Opening Keynote Speaker: Lori Fresina, MA – Vice President and Executive Director of Voices for Healthy Kids, American Heart Association • Summit PPT (Box Link) • Nebraska Land Acknowledgment (Box Link) o Honor Native Land, A Guide & Call to Acknowledgment (Web Link) o https://usdac.us/nativeland (Web Link) • AHA Racial Equity In Public Police, Message Guide, February 2021 (Web Link) Local Reflection Provided by: Dr. Ali Kahn, UNMC College of Public Health and Octavia Duncan, BUILD Health Initiative, Heartland Family Services 1:15-1:35 Research & Project Fair Highlights Hosted by Child Health Research Institute • 123 Connect with Me, Whitney Koehn (Box Link) • ENERGY Fitness, Emiliani Peroni (Box Link) 1:35-1:45 Break 1:45-2:30 Preventing Childhood Obesity (PCO) Grantee Panel • Summit PPT (Box Link) 2:30-2:35 Break 2:35-3:25 Healthy Eating with Children through
    [Show full text]
  • Great Meme War:” the Alt-Right and Its Multifarious Enemies
    Angles New Perspectives on the Anglophone World 10 | 2020 Creating the Enemy The “Great Meme War:” the Alt-Right and its Multifarious Enemies Maxime Dafaure Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/angles/369 ISSN: 2274-2042 Publisher Société des Anglicistes de l'Enseignement Supérieur Electronic reference Maxime Dafaure, « The “Great Meme War:” the Alt-Right and its Multifarious Enemies », Angles [Online], 10 | 2020, Online since 01 April 2020, connection on 28 July 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/angles/369 This text was automatically generated on 28 July 2020. Angles. New Perspectives on the Anglophone World is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The “Great Meme War:” the Alt-Right and its Multifarious Enemies 1 The “Great Meme War:” the Alt- Right and its Multifarious Enemies Maxime Dafaure Memes and the metapolitics of the alt-right 1 The alt-right has been a major actor of the online culture wars of the past few years. Since it came to prominence during the 2014 Gamergate controversy,1 this loosely- defined, puzzling movement has achieved mainstream recognition and has been the subject of discussion by journalists and scholars alike. Although the movement is notoriously difficult to define, a few overarching themes can be delineated: unequivocal rejections of immigration and multiculturalism among most, if not all, alt- right subgroups; an intense criticism of feminism, in particular within the manosphere community, which itself is divided into several clans with different goals and subcultures (men’s rights activists, Men Going Their Own Way, pick-up artists, incels).2 Demographically speaking, an overwhelming majority of alt-righters are white heterosexual males, one of the major social categories who feel dispossessed and resentful, as pointed out as early as in the mid-20th century by Daniel Bell, and more recently by Michael Kimmel (Angry White Men 2013) and Dick Howard (Les Ombres de l’Amérique 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Tremblers in GOP's Tectonic Plates
    V19, N25 Thursday March 6, 2014 Tremblers in GOP’s tectonic plates Bosma, Kittle story, family groups lashing out shows a GOP on edge By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – With the Indiana Republican Party at its power apex, the inevitable fissures are beginning to appear as economic and social conserva- tives are clashing. Nothing revealed this more than the constitutional mar- riage amendment where more than a dozen senators and repre- sentatives broke away, supporting the vote from this November to possibly the stripping out of the second 2016 when Gov. Mike Pence is expected sentence. On the Indiana Repub- to seek reelection, the last two weeks lican Central Committee, a clear have found social conservatives lashing majority said to be around 15 of out at the GOP legislative establishment. the 21 members opposed HJR-3. Former Republican Jim Kittle (left) and And in the fallout of the Continued on page 4 second sentence, which delayed Speaker Brian Bosma. Putin’s Russia, Crimea By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – As day slipped into night during the cruel winter of 2014, millions of Americans watched the mesmerizing closing ceremony of the Sochi Olympics. This was a stunning facade of the Russian Fed- eration, particularly its tribute “He made an inexcusable to writers, with their portraits rising up from the floor - Leo mistake, he did. He went to a Tolstoy, Anton Chekov, Fyodor debate - if he’d just gotten a flat Dostoevsky, and, amazingly, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the tire, he’d be a senator today.” author who revealed the epic - Club for Growth’s Chris cruelty of gulags of the Soviet Stalin era.
    [Show full text]
  • AMERICAN PRIMARY ELECTIONS 1945–2012 Thesis by J. Andrew
    OF PRIMARY IMPORTANCE: AMERICAN PRIMARY ELECTIONS 1945–2012 Thesis by J. Andrew Sinclair In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 2013 (Defended May 10, 2013) ii © 2013 J. Andrew Sinclair All Rights Reserved iii Acknowledgements I would like to thank the members of my committee for their aid and advice: Dr. D. Roderick Kiewiet, Dr. Christian Grose, Dr. Philip Hoffman, Dr. Jean-Laurent Rosenthal, and Dr. R. Michael Alvarez. In particular, I would like to thank Dr. Alvarez for not growing weary of Sinclairs (of one kind or another) pestering him in his office over the last dozen years. Pieces of the analysis here could not have been accomplished without the aid of my classmates Thomas Ruchti and Peter Foley; fellow students Allyson Pellissier, Jackie Kimble, Federico Tadei, and Andi Bui Kanady made helpful suggestions and comments as well. Jeffery Wagner, Olivia Schlueter-Corey, and Madeleine Gysi helped collect and organize the data required for the multi-state analysis. Ryan Hutchison helped put me in contact with former State Senator and Lt. Governor Abel Maldonado. Dr. Morgan Kousser helpfully directed me to the Los Angeles Law Library. Dr. Jonathan Nagler and Dr. Alvarez provided helpful advice on the 2012 survey; the James Irvine Foundation provided generous funding for that research. Elissa Gysi provided very helpful advice for conducting the legal research; she also agreed to marry and tolerate the author as books piled up around the apartment. I would also like to thank my parents, Dr. J. Stephen Sinclair and Joan Sinclair, for… a list too long to enumerate.
    [Show full text]