software download gpl free for commercial use Software download gpl free for commercial use. Completing the CAPTCHA proves you are a human and gives you temporary access to the web property. What can I do to prevent this in the future? If you are on a personal connection, like at home, you can run an anti-virus scan on your device to make sure it is not infected with malware. If you are at an office or shared network, you can ask the network administrator to run a scan across the network looking for misconfigured or infected devices. Another way to prevent getting this page in the future is to use Privacy Pass. You may need to download version 2.0 now from the Chrome Web Store. Cloudflare Ray ID: 67e3a48d4cf20d42 • Your IP : 188.246.226.140 • Performance & security by Cloudflare. Blender is Free Software. Blender is released under the GNU General Public License (GPL, or “free software”). This license grants people a number of freedoms: You are free to use Blender, for any purpose You are free to distribute Blender You can study how Blender works and change it You can distribute changed versions of Blender. The GPL strictly aims at protecting these freedoms, requiring everyone to share their modifications when they also share the software in public. That aspect is commonly referred to as Copyleft. The Blender Foundation and its projects on blender.org are committed to preserving Blender as free software. License details. The source code we develop at blender.org is default being licensed as GNU GPL Version 2 or later. Some modules we make are using more permissive licenses, though, for example, the Blender Cycles rendering engine is available as Apache 2.0. Blender also uses many modules or libraries from other projects. For example, Python uses the Python License; Bullet uses the Zlib License; Libmv uses the MIT License; and OSL, a BSD License. All the components that together make Blender are compatible under the newer GNU GPL Version 3. That is also the license to use for any distribution of Blender binaries. Your Artwork. What you create with Blender is your sole property. All your artwork – images or movie files – including the .blend files and other data files Blender can write, is free for you to use as you like. That means that Blender can be used commercially by artists, by studios to make animation films or VFX, by game artists to work on commercial games, by scientists for research, and by students in educational institutions. Blender’s GNU GPL license guarantees you this freedom. Nobody is ever permitted to take it away, in contrast to trial or “educational” versions of commercial software that will forbid your work in commercial situations. Privacy and Internet access. Blender respects your privacy, no registration is needed, no connection to the internet is made if you decide to install and use Blender. Blender does not need internet to function properly. Some add-ons bundled with Blender may access the internet for additional services. These add-ons are not enabled on installing Blender. These add-ons are not required to be enabled for proper functioning of the software, nor will any Blender function ask for enabling such add-ons. Add-ons that require internet will ask a user explicit permission to use internet while or after enabling the add-on. Note: this applies to the official version provided via blender.org. We always recommend you to use the official releases. Sharing or selling Blender add-ons (Python scripts) Blender’s Python API is an integral part of the software, used to define the user interface or develop tools for example. The GNU GPL license therefore requires that such scripts (if published) are being shared under a GPL compatible license. You are free to sell such scripts, but the sales then is restricted to the download service itself. Your customers will receive the script under the same license (GPL), with the same free conditions as everyone has for Blender. Sharing Blender or Blender add-ons or scripts is always OK and not considered piracy. FAQ for Artists. We collected the most common Frequently Asked Questions here. Website license. Most of the blender website is available as Creative Commons Attribution, with some exceptions. Read about that here. A open-source, free and non-commercial license? [closed] Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Closed 7 years ago . I know that topic was already discussed a lot of times here, but none answer answered my question. Since licenses like GPL, MIT, Apache and other common licenses don't answer my question, I will try describe the license I'm looking for my programming projects: Required: Open-source and free Include a copy of license in the code. Allow: Share: modify, publish, copy, distribute and transmit at the same license Private, company, government. ultimately, anyone can use this project. Not allow: Hold liable Use trademark Patent any part of the project Commercial usage (if you want fork this project, you can't force earn money with it [by any way], except if users want donate because THEY think this is a good project) So, anyone can help me? If don't exist, can I create something like that? What I tried before ask: - Any license attends to what I want. - He don't want allow publish other projects with her code. - Don't have licenses like that for softwares. - "Can I use a Creative Commons license for software? We do not recommend it." 1 Answer 1. This is not open source. Open source must always allow commercial use, that's part of the Open Source Definition. What you can do however, is what the AGPL does, which is require publishing a working link to the complete source code to a live running web application on its site. Since most commercial users don't want to do that, it effectively prohibits most commercial use in the form of a public-facing web application. Can I use GPL software in a commercial application. If I use GPL software in my application, but don't modify or distribute it, do I have to release my application under the GPL? What if I modify some software that my application uses. Then do I have to release my application under the GPL, or can I just supply the modified software under the GPLs terms. And what if I use GPL software, but don't modify it, can I distribute it with my application? My case in point is, I have a PHP framework which I use the GeSHi library to highlight some output. Because GeSHi is GPL, does my framework have to be GPL? Can I modify GeSHi for particular use cases of my application if I supply the modifications back to the GeSHi maintainers? Can I redistribute my framework with GeSHi? 6 Answers 6. If I use GPL software in my application, but don't modify or distribute it, do I have to release my application under the GPL? ANSWER: Your question is a little ambiguous. Two cases: (a) If you do not distribute YOUR APPLICATION, then the answer is No, because you did not distribute your application. For example if it was for internal use only in your company, then you have no obligation to do anything. (b) If you do distribute YOUR APPLICATION, and you used something GPL as part of your application (even if only linking at run-time to a library) - and even if you do not charge money - and even if you do not change that GPL s/w in any way - then you MUST make the source of YOUR APPLICATION available. Making source available does not mean download. IT might be that you must get a written request and you send a photocopy of a listing (see comments: you can't actually send a listing. This was exaggeration to make a point) . You are allowed to charge a "reasonable" handling / copying charge. But you can not escape the obligation to make your own source code available. What if I modify some software that my application uses. Then do I have to release my application under the GPL, or can I just supply the modified software under the GPLs terms. ANSWER: See above. If you used GPL s/w, then you must make your source code available. This includes the modified GPL code. And what if I use GPL software, but don't modify it, can I distribute it with my application? ANSWER: See above. You can distribute it (the GPL code), provided you make your source available. Because GeSHi is GPL, does my framework have to be GPL? ANSWER: If you distribute your framework, then YES. Can I modify GeSHi for particular use cases of my application if I supply the modifications back to the GeSHi maintainers? ANSWER: You can if you want to. You don't have to. You could modify it, but when you distribute your application you are obliged to make your source available and also the source for the modifications you made to the library. Can I redistribute my framework with GeSHi? ANSWER: You can if you want to. If your application is not distributed with the GPL code and you make users download it separately to make use of it, then your case is a little bit more special and might provoke some argument, but the same principle will most likely ultimately apply: you must make your source available. If you want to avoid these problems then you need to use things with a different license or at the very least the LGPL which will allow run-time calling of libraries without the viral-spread of the GPL conditions back to your code. When in doubt you need legal advice. Any advice you get here (from me or anyone else)should be treated fairly carefully. Only a lawyer can give you proper legal advice. Licensing Showdown: Creative Commons vs Royalty Free vs GPL. Creative Commons, Royalty-free, and General Public License (GPL) are types of licensing for images, graphics, and video. Designers, photographers, software developers, and content creators regularly access and use licensed media for a variety of projects. The question is, which license is best? Licensing gives users the ability to legally use a piece of media in their product or design, while the original creator retains the copyright. This is a win-win for not only the creator and the copyright holder, but also for the customer. Licensed media is usually high-quality and very professional. Therefore, it lends a fantastic flair to projects that might otherwise turn out dull if the images or videos were bootstrapped at home. Let’s take a look at Creative Commons, Royalty-free, and GPL license options and identify when they’re best to use. About Creative Commons Licensing. Creative Commons is a standardized set of licenses that cover artists worldwide. It’s an easy way for creators to set legal boundaries around public uses of their work, including copying, distribution, and use in designs. Additionally, Creative Commons licenses are straightforward and easy to understand for the licensor. A major goal behind Creative Commons is to make sure that creators get the proper credit for their work. These licenses are based on existing copyright laws and last as long as copyright. Beyond that, creators can give licensors extra rights for using their works. Types of Creative Commons Licenses. The licensing options offered by Creative Commons include: Attribution (CC BY) : Allows for distribution, adaptation, remixing, and derivative works as long as the creator gets the credit. Attribution- ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) : Allows for the same as CC BY, but applies to commercial works. CC BY-SA works similarly to an open-source license for software. This license is similar to GPL, which we’ll discuss below. Attribution-NoDerivs (CC BY-ND) : Allows an original work to be used for commercial purposes with attribution, but not to be adapted. Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) : Allows for non-commercial use of creators’ works with attribution. Licensors can adapt the original and make derivative works, but they can’t be used commercially. Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA) : Allows for non-commercial derivative works as long as credit is given to the creator. Also similar to a GPL. Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) : Allows licensors to download and share creators’ works with attribution. Works under this license cannot be altered or shared commercially. Public Domain (CC0) : Allows creators to waive the rights to their works, placing them in the public domain. Users may alter and distribute CC0 works for commercial purposes or personal use. A Creative Commons license gives you specific rights for the works you purchase, and each individual license has its own set of rules you’ll need to understand before purchasing a piece of media. These rules dictate how and when you can use a specific work, so it’s crucial that you carefully study and understand your options. Who Should Use Creative Commons? All Creative Commons licenses except CC0 require attribution, and even many of the commercial use options don’t allow for derivative works. This can cause difficulties for graphic designers and software developers who need the freedom to alter the original works. CC0 works are great for bulk content creators who need a wide rotation of images for their content. However, CC0 images also tend to be widely used, so if you’re a designer or developer, you may want to purchase licensing instead. About Royalty-Free Licensing. Royalty-free licensing is common in the stock and microstock photography industry. Licensors who purchase royalty-free images and videos pay a one-time fee for the media, and can then use and re-use it without continuing to pay over time. Use of royalty-free media depends heavily on the licensing terms of the specific work. When you purchase a stock photo license from a stock agency such as Shutterstock or iStock, the creator retains the copyright. That means the creator also sets the boundaries on how the work can be used long-term. Creators can sell licensing to their works over and over. Therefore, royalty-free works are not part of the public domain, unlike Creative Commons public domain licenses. Royalty-free works are for use only by the licensor and can’t be transferred. They’re also non-exclusive, meaning others can purchase the same license as you. As long as you remain within the license’s stated boundaries, you can use royalty-free works as often as you like, anywhere in the world, indefinitely. Types of Royalty-Free Licenses. There are three types of royalty-free licensing: Editorial-use only : Allows for royalty-free media to be used for articles and other written works, both online and off. Print runs are limited and tend to range from 250,000 to 500,000 copies of a published work. Commercial use : Allows royalty-free media to be used commercially, within specific limits. An image or piece of media may be used in digital and physical formats, but print runs are limited as in the editorial-use category. If you purchase royalty-free media for commercial use, be sure to look closely at the restrictions on your specific platform before using it. Extended license : Allows for commercial use of works, as well as the resale of products that feature those works. Licensors get unlimited distribution rights as long as the media is part of a design–meaning, you can’t resell the original work itself. Prices for royalty-free media can range anywhere from a low monthly subscription to a stock image site to higher-end costs for certain pieces of media that can cost upward of $100. Who Should Use Royalty-Free Licensing vs. Creative Commons? Royalty-free licensing is great for designers and content creators who want to purchase media for extended long-term use, without worrying about paying for a license over and over. Unlike Creative Commons, royalty-free licensing may not need to be re-visited. Content creators, publishers, and businesses that make physical products might want to consider an extended license, which can pay dividends in the long run. About General Public License (GPL) General Public License (GPL) is a license that allows a work to be free and stay free indefinitely. This allows for fewer restrictions around the public use of that media. This ensures users can utilize works that incorporate that media freely, forever. GPL is often referred to as “copyleft” and is regularly updated to stay ahead of technological and licensing developments. When you use GPL, you have the freedom and flexibility to ensure that: You can change or alter your software however you need to, indefinitely Your users can utilize your software however they need to You can freely share your software without fear of licensing ramifications You can freely share your software updates and changes. Who Should Use GPL vs. Creative Commons? GPL allows for media to be used and altered indefinitely as part of a greater design–for example, in the case of open-source software. GPL is fantastic for software developers who need to avoid running into rights-related issues with the media they use in their software. Elegant Themes uses GPL for the photographs we include with our layouts for these reasons. That means we can update layouts whenever necessary and share them freely with our users. Additionally, our users can utilize those layouts in whatever way they need, and they’re covered in terms of the image rights. Wrapping Up. Whether you go with Creative Commons, royalty-free, or GPL for your image licensing comes down to your individual situation. You have to consider what’s best for your business. For example, do you need the ability to share or sell unlimited quantities of a work that features a licensed image? Are you a developer concerned with keeping your open-source software free? Financially, consider the choice that is best and most secure in the long run–and the one that will allow you the level of freedom you need to utilize a licensed work to its fullest potential. What type of licensing do you use for your business? Let us know in the comments! Featured image via CkyBe / shutterstock.com. By Haley Walden. Haley Walden is a copywriter, editor, and author who helps brands and entrepreneurs position themselves as industry leaders, influencers, innovators, and visioneers in their fields. She's a multi-passionate geek with many obsessions, including pop culture, Star Wars, martial arts, film, music, and musical theatre. Haley lives with her husband and kids near Muscle Shoals, Alabama.