Routine Abuse, Routine Denial

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Routine Abuse, Routine Denial ROUTINE ABUSE, ROUTINE DENIAL Civil Rights and the Political Crisis in Bahrain Human Rights Watch/Middle East Human Rights Watch New York AAA Washington AAA London AAA Brussels Copyright 8 June 1997 by Human Rights Watch. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. ISBN 1-56432-218-1 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 97-73623 Addresses for Human Rights Watch 485 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10017-6104 Tel: (212) 972-8400, Fax: (212) 972-0905, E-mail: [email protected] 1522 K Street, N.W., #910, Washington, DC 20005-1202 Tel: (202) 371-6592, Fax: (202) 371-0124, E-mail: [email protected] 33 Islington High Street, N1 9LH London, UK Tel: (171) 713-1995, Fax: (171) 713-1800, E-mail: [email protected] 15 Rue Van Campenhout, 1000 Brussels, Belgium Tel: (2) 732-2009, Fax: (2) 732-0471, E-mail: [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org Gopher Address://gopher.humanrights.org:5000/11/int/hrw Listserv address: To subscribe to the list, send an e-mail message to [email protected] with Asubscribe hrw-news@ in the body of the message (leave the subject line blank). HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH Human Rights Watch conducts regular, systematic investigations of human rights abuses in some seventy countries around the world. Our reputation for timely, reliable disclosures has made us an essential source of information for those concerned with human rights. We address the human rights practices of governments of all political stripes, of all geopolitical alignments, and of all ethnic and religious persuasions. Human Rights Watch defends freedom of thought and expression, due process and equal protection of the law, and a vigorous civil society; we document and denounce murders, disappearances, torture, arbitrary imprisonment, discrimination, and other abuses of internationally recognized human rights. Our goal is to hold governments accountable if they transgress the rights of their people. Human Rights Watch began in 1978 with the founding of its Helsinki division. Today, it includes five divisions covering Africa, the Americas, Asia, the Middle East, as well as the signatories of the Helsinki accords. It also includes three collaborative projects on arms transfers, children=s rights, and women=s rights. It maintains offices in New York, Washington, Los Angeles, London, Brussels, Moscow, Dushanbe, Rio de Janeiro, and Hong Kong. Human Rights Watch is an independent, nongovernmental organization, supported by contributions from private individuals and foundations worldwide. It accepts no government funds, directly or indirectly. The staff includes Kenneth Roth, executive director; Michele Alexander, development director; Cynthia Brown, program director; Barbara Guglielmo, finance and administration director; Robert Kimzey, publications director; Jeri Laber, special advisor; Lotte Leicht, Brussels office director; Susan Osnos, communications director; Jemera Rone, counsel; Wilder Tayler, general counsel; and Joanna Weschler, United Nations representative. The regional directors of Human Rights Watch are Peter Takirambudde, Africa; José Miguel Vivanco, Americas; Sidney Jones, Asia; Holly Cartner, Helsinki; and Eric Goldstein, Middle East (acting). The project directors are Joost R. Hiltermann, Arms Project; Lois Whitman, Children=s Rights Project; and Dorothy Q. Thomas, Women=s Rights Project. The members of the board of directors are Robert L. Bernstein, chair; Adrian W. DeWind, vice chair; Roland Algrant, Lisa Anderson, William Carmichael, Dorothy Cullman, Gina Despres, Irene Diamond, Fiona Druckenmiller, Edith Everett, Jonathan Fanton, James C. Goodale, Jack Greenberg, Vartan Gregorian, Alice H. Henkin, Stephen L. Kass, Marina Pinto Kaufman, Bruce Klatsky, Harold Hongju Koh, Alexander MacGregor, Josh Mailman, Samuel K. Murumba, Andrew Nathan, Jane Olson, Peter Osnos, Kathleen Peratis, Bruce Rabb, Sigrid Rausing, Anita Roddick, Orville Schell, Sid Sheinberg, Gary G. Sick, Malcolm Smith, Domna Stanton, Maureen White, and Maya Wiley. ABOUT THIS REPORT Material for this report was gathered by Human Rights Watch/Middle East between March 1996 and February 1997. The government of Bahrain rejected our request to send an official information-gathering mission to the country. Human Rights Watch representatives did visit Bahrain briefly nonetheless, where they met with defense lawyers and persons who had been detained by the authorities, as well as prominent persons in various professions and in business. Because of the unauthorized nature of the visit, however, Human Rights Watch was unable to speak with government officials, and our access to persons in neighborhoods under surveillance was severely constricted. In addition, Bahrainis living in the country, even lawyers and prominent businesspeople, agreed to speak with Human Rights Watch only on condition that they not be identified. We also met with Bahrainis living in exile in Dubai, Kuwait, Beirut, Damascus, London, Lund and Copenhagen, and with Bahrainis living in and visiting the United States. Interviews referred to in the text, unless the location of the interview is specified, took place outside of Bahrain. This report was written by Joe Stork, advocacy director of Human Rights Watch/Middle East. Steve Rothman, intern at Human Rights Watch/Middle East, and Shira Robinson, Human Rights Watch/Middle East associate, provided greatly appreciated research assistance. Clary Bencomo and Gamal Abouali of Human Rights Watch/Middle East helped with the translation of Arabic documents. Kuwaiti human rights activists who cannot be named provided translation assistance with interviews conducted in that country. Several Bahraini lawyers also provided invaluable assistance and clarifications on points of Bahraini law, but they cannot be named for reasons of personal safety. Said Essaloumi, of Article 19, kindly shared with Human Rights Watch an unpublished report covering press freedom issues in Bahrain. This report was edited by Jeri Laber, senior advisor to Human Rights Watch, and Eric Goldstein, acting executive director of Human Rights Watch/Middle East. Shira Robinson and Awali Samara, Human Rights Watch/Middle East associates, prepared the text for publication. CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................1 2. RECOMMENDATIONS..................................................................................5 3. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ...................................................................12 4. ORIGINS OF THE PRESENT CRISIS .........................................................23 The Petition Campaign.........................................................................24 Demonstrations.....................................................................................28 The Government=s Response ................................................................33 5. HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS.................................................................43 Violations of Due Process Rights.........................................................44 Bahrain=s Courts and Legal System........................................44 Violations by Security Forces in the Process of Arrest ..........48 Torture and Abuse of Detainees, Denial of Access to Counsel, and Uncorroborated Confessions .......................52 Arbitrary Detention................................................................64 Violations of Political Rights ...............................................................66 Freedom of Association .........................................................68 Freedom of Speech ................................................................71 Freedom of the Press..............................................................76 Forced Exile...........................................................................80 6. THE ROLE OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY...........................86 The Arab World ...................................................................................86 Iran .......................................................................................................89 The United States .................................................................................91 APPENDIX ........................................................................................................97 1. INTRODUCTION Human rights abuses in Bahrain are wide-ranging and fall into two basic categories. The first relates to law enforcement and administration of justice issues. These encompass the behavior of security forces toward those under arrest and detention, and when confronting civil disturbances; arbitrary detention; physical and psychological abuse of detainees; denial of access to legal counsel; and denial of the right to a swift and impartial judicial hearing. The second area of human rights violations relates to the broad denial of fundamental political rights and civil liberties, including freedom of expression, freedom of association and assembly, and the right to participate in the conduct of public affairs. In terms of numbers of people affected, the situation has been particularly acute since the end of 1994, with the onset of a period of protracted civil unrest that has continued into the spring of 1997.1 This unrest has increasingly taken on the coloration of a sectarian conflict between the majority Shi`a population and the Sunni ruling family and military- political establishment. The government of Bahrain has dismissed the unrest as the work of AHizb Allah
Recommended publications
  • Civil Society and Web 2.0 Technology: a Study of Social Media in the Kingdom of Bahrain
    CIVIL SOCIETY AND WEB 2.0 TECHNOLOGY: A STUDY OF SOCIAL MEDIA IN THE KINGDOM OF BAHRAIN Magdalena Maria Karolak New York Institute of Technology College of Arts and Science, Adliya, Kingdom of Bahrain [email protected] Abstract. In the era of globalization, the spread of Information and Communication Technology has created a new opportunity for the emergence of civil society in the Middle East. Barber (1999) defined civil society as "the free space in which democratic attitudes are cultivated and democratic behavior is conditioned." In countries where talking politics in public is still not welcome, social media became an important tool for expressing personal opinions on recent developments in politics. In Bahrain, the Internet provided a platform for the exchange of information and for political mobilization that is anonymous and difficult to control by the establishment. We suggest that in the long run social media could promote the growth of civil society, which is the bedrock of democracy. In this paper we aim at assessing the role of social media in the creation of civil society in Bahrain. On the one hand, we observe the positive effects of the growing community of Bahraini bloggers. On the other hand, we analyze the use of social media in the Day of Rage uprising and its aftermath, which shows that the process of creation of civil society is still at an early stage. The case of the Kingdom of Bahrain illustrated overall trends observable also in other GCC countries. 1 Key words: blogging, civil society, Bahrain Introduction The revival of academic interest in the concept of civil society that begun in the years 1970s and 1980s was linked to the democratic transformation experienced in the world (Dziubka, 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Kingdom of Bahrain Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review
    Kingdom of Bahrain Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review 27th Session of the UPR Working Group Submitted 22 September 2016 Submission by Bahrain Human Rights Observatory (BHRO): Creation of parties and non-governmental organizations Freedom of assembly and peaceful demonstration Excessive suppression of protests Freedom of opinion and expression BHRO : Bahrain Human Rights Observatory Mrs. Jalila Al-Salman Mobile: +97336595325 e-mail: [email protected] Background: This report, addressed to the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) session on Bahrain, covers the period from the end of the UPR in May 2012 up to the writing of this report in April 2016. The report is based on the Bahraini Constitution and the laws acted upon domestically. It is also founded on the United Nation’s Charter, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as well as major conventions and treaties that Bahrain had endorsed in this field. The figures and statistics in this report depend on our observations of the violations committed. Bahrain’s enforcement of the 2012 Human Rights Council’s Recommendations: The United Nation’s Human Rights Council issued, in its second cycle in May 2012, 21 recommendations regarding the freedom of opinion, expression, peaceful assembly and association. Albeit Bahrain had roughly agreed upon all the recommendations mentioned, nothing had actually changed except an enhancement in the level of suppression against protesters. The Humans Rights Council had advised to make space for a political opposition. However, the Bahraini authorities did not comply with these recommendations, and more so pressured political associations to dissolve The Islamic Action Society [also known as Amal Party] in 2012 and chased down al-Wefaq National Islamic Society and the National Democratic Action Society (Waad) until al-Wefaq was dissolved in June 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prime Minister Development Efforts and Benefit • the Citizens
    TWITTER CELEBS @newsofbahrain OP-ED 8 Israel’s Cabinet lurches even further rightward INSTAGRAM Munn replies /nobmedia 26 to fan who couldn’t LINKEDIN MONDAY newsofbahrain NOVEMBER 2018 click a photo WHATSAPP 200 FILS Actor Olivia Munn re- 38444680 ISSUE NO. 7942 sponded to a fan, who is a FACEBOOK pilot by profession, who /nobmedia got cold feet as soon as he MAIL saw his crush -- actor Oliv- [email protected] ia Munn, in front of him. WEBSITE P 13 newsofbahrain.com Brave 18 paves path for expansion of MMA 15 SPORTS WORLD 6 Around 100 Syrians struggle to breathe after ‘toxic’ attack A grand welcome His Majesty welcomes Saudi Crown Prince HRH Prince Mohammed bin Salman at Sakhir Air Base His Majesty holds talks with HRH Prince Mohammed bin Salman in the presence of HRH the Premier and HRH the Crown Prince. Manama Saudi Arabia and Kingdom of Bahrain Foreign Minister Shaikh Khalid bin part of his regional tour. During the were played. Ahmed Al Khalifa said the visit “high- visit Mohammed bin Salman met with is Majesty King Hamad bin Isa HM the King and HRH Saudi Crown lights the two Kingdoms’ approach Vice President and Prime Minister of Al Khalifa yesterday welcomed Prince inspected the Guards of Honour based on continuous communication the UAE and Ruler of Dubai, Shaikh HHRH Prince Mohammed bin lined up to salute them. and coordination at all levels regarding Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, Crown A mission of honour chaired by For- all issues and in various forums”.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary and Municipal Elections in Bahrain 2006: Islamic Sunnis Are Leading the Second Elections in Bahrain
    Parliamentary and municipal elections in Bahrain 2006: Islamic Sunnis are leading the second elections in Bahrain 13 December 2006 The first round The results of the Bahraini parliamentary and municipal elections were a frustration to more than 25 former Bahraini deputies who re-nominated themselves. Only six of them won. The elections were frustrating also to the women. Out of 16 women candidates, only one woman won by acclaim while the other women lost. None of these women were qualified for the rerun. Meanwhile, the Islamic national Accord [Wifaq] Society won 15 seats out of a total of 26 seats. This was confirmed by the final results of the first round elections. The total number of candidates who ran for parliamentary elections reached 207 candidates who nominated themselves in 39 electoral constituencies while 13 candidates announced their withdrawal from the electoral battle. The candidates competed for 40 House of Representatives seats. Meanwhile, 171 candidates competed in the municipal elections for 40 seats in five municipal councils in Bahrain’s five governorates. Surprises as violent as a thunderbolt were reported during the elections. Most former parliamentary figures lost the election. The most important of these were the first deputy speaker of the House of Representatives Abdul Hadi Marhoon, who won 300 votes only compared to his competitor who obtained 4,000 votes. The results of the elections also showed the loss of the chairmen of the financial and foreign committees. No second Bahraini woman won. The only woman winner was Latifah al-Qu’ud who won by acclaim. Moreover, Sulaiman Abbawi, the first Christian to run for municipal elections, lost.
    [Show full text]
  • Americans for Democracy & Human Rights in Bahrain (ADHRB)
    Americans for Democracy & Human Rights in Bahrain (ADHRB) and Bahrain Center Cultural Society (BCCS) For consideration at the 27th session of the UN working group in April-May 2017 22 September 2016 1. ADHRB is a non-profit organization that fosters awareness of and support for democracy and human rights in Bahrain and the Middle East. 2. ADHRB’s reporting is based primarily on its United Nations (UN) complaint program, by which it works directly with victims of human rights violations, their family members or their lawyers on the ground in the region to document evidence of abuses and submit this evidence to the UN Special Procedures. ADHRB has repeatedly requested permission to formally visit Bahrain in order to consult with government officials, national human rights mechanisms, and our independent civil society partners on the ground, regarding issues relating to the UPR process, but has been so far denied access. As yet, the Government of Bahrain has declined to cooperate with ADHRB on any level. 3. BCCS is Bahraini cultural center and advocacy organization based in Berlin, Germany. 4. ADHRB and BCCS welcome the opportunity to contribute to the third cycle of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Bahrain. This submission focuses on Bahrain’s compliance with its second-cycle recommendations to take measures to meet the aspirations of victims of discrimination and protect ethnic and religious groups from abuse. Introduction 5. In its second UPR cycle, the Government of Bahrain fully supported recommendations 115.70 (Belgium) and 115.93 (Canada) concerning efforts to meet the aspirations of the victims of discrimination and the protection of ethnic and religious communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Elections and Parliamentary Activity in the GCC States. Broadening Political Participation in the Gulf Monarchies Since the 1990S
    Andrzej Kapiszewski ELECTIONS AND PARLIAMENTARY ACTIVITY IN THE GCC STATES. BROADENING POLITICAL PARTICIPATION IN THE GULF MONARCHIES SINCE THE 1990s 2 0 0 5 European U niversity Institute Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Sixth Mediterranean Social and Political Research Meeting Montecatini, 16-20 March 2005 Elections and Parliamentary Activity in the GCC States. Broadening Political Participation in the Gulf Monarchies since the 1990s Andrzej Kapiszewski Krakow, Poland © 2005 All rights reserved No part of this paper may be distributed, quoted or reproduced in any form without permission by the author. For authorised quotation(s) please acknowledge as follows: „Paper presented at the Sixth Mediterranean Social and Political Research Meeting of the Mediterranean Programme of the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies at the European University Institute, Montecatini Terme, March 2005”. Introduction There is an overwhelming agreement that a deficit of freedom undermines human development. As is also well known, there is a dramatic gap between the levels of democracy in Arab countries and the rest of the world1. In particular, none of the 16 Arab majority countries has a democratically elected government. At the same time, the combined GDP of all Arab countries is less than that of Spain, and labor productivity in these countries dropped between I960 and 1990, while it soared elsewhere in the world. Even Africa outperformed the Arab region in rates of economic growth, etc. Nevertheless, there is a group of Arab states in which the situation is quite different from the portrait painted above: the monarchies of the Gulf. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Oman, members of the so-called Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), are among the richest countries in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Apart in Their Own Land Government Discrimination Against Shia in Bahrain
    Apart in eir Own Land GOVERNMENT DISCRIMINATION AGAINST SHIA IN BAHRAIN VOLUME I Violence, Political Disclusion, and Attacks on the Shia Religious Establishment Apart in Their Own Land GOVERNMENT DISCRIMINATION AGAINST SHIA IN BAHRAIN VOLUME I Violence, Political Disclusion, and Attacks on the Shia Religious Establishment February 2015 Updated April 2015 1001 Connecticut Avenue Northwest, Suite 205 • Washington, D.C. 20036 • 202.621.6141 • www.adhrb.org • @ADHRB ©2014, Americans for Democracy and Human Rights in Bahrain (ADHRB), the Bahrain Center for Human Rights (BCHR), and the Bahrain Institute for Rights and Democracy (BIRD). All rights reserved. Americans for Democracy and Human Rights in Bahrain is a non-profit, 501(c)(3) organization based in Washington, D.C. We seek to foster awareness of and support for democracy and human rights in Bahrain and the Middle East. The Bahrain Center for Human Rights (BCHR) is a non-profit, non-governmental organization, registered with the Bahraini Ministry of Labor and Social Services since July 2002. Despite an order by the authorities in November 2004 to close, the BCHR is still functioning after gaining a wide local and international support for its struggle to promote human rights in Bahrain. The Bahrain Institute for Rights and Democracy is a London, UK based non-profit organization focusing on advocacy, education and awareness for the calls of democracy and human rights in Bahrain. Americans for Democracy and Human Rights in Bahrain 1001 Connecticut Ave. Northwest, Suite 205 Washington, DC
    [Show full text]
  • Methods of Repression in Bahrain During the 20Th and 21St Century: from the Civil List to Social Media
    Durham E-Theses Methods of Repression in Bahrain during the 20th and 21st Century: From the Civil List to Social Media JONES, MARC,OWEN How to cite: JONES, MARC,OWEN (2016) Methods of Repression in Bahrain during the 20th and 21st Century: From the Civil List to Social Media, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/11554/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Methods of Repression in Bahrain during the 20th and 21st Century: From the Civil List to Social Media Marc Owen Jones A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctorate of Philosophy School of Government and International Affairs Durham University (November 2015) 1 Marc Owen Jones: Thesis Abstract Methods of Repression in Bahrain During the 20th and 21st Century: From the Civil List to Social Media Despite being afflicted by cyclical bouts of unrest over the past century, repression in Bahrain as a concept has not been the focus of considerable academic attention.
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Herb Pp41-47.Pmd
    Democratization in the Arab World? EMIRS AND PARLIAMENTS IN THE GULF Michael Herb Michael Herb is assistant professor of political science at Georgia State University. He is the author of All in the Family: Absolutism, Revolution and Democracy in the Middle Eastern Monarchies (1999). Talk of democracy in the states of the Persian Gulf often inspires skepticism. There is, first and foremost, the anxiety that even modest moves toward democracy will lead to their Talibanization. But fears that an Islamist takeover will result from a partial transition are exag- gerated. As much as the sad experience of Algeria shows the very real dangers of ill-considered attempts at democratization, it is unlikely in the extreme that an Algerian scenario will play out in the Gulf: The ruling families there are too deeply ensconced to be ousted by Islamists. In each country, the ruling family holds a monopoly on the cabinet port- folios of defense, interior, and foreign affairs (the “ministries of sovereignty,” as they are called), along with numerous other posts—all of which afford the dynasties tremendous political security. To be sure, the intrafamilial diffusion of power that results can and does lead to disputes within the dynasties, but because each also has effective mecha- nisms for internal dispute resolution, they remain durable.1 The resilience of the Gulf autocracies makes full democratization a distant prospect, but there is a silver lining of sorts to this: Monarchical stability lowers the risks of partial democratization in the form of free elections for a parliament of limited authority. Among the Gulf states, only Kuwait has extensive experience with such a legislature, its parlia- ment having sat in most years since 1963.
    [Show full text]
  • Arab Guide for Free and Fair Elections
    ﺍﻟﻤﺠﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ Arab Guide for Free and Fair Elections Pr. Ali Saoui (Main Researcher and Writer) Project Overall Manager Project Consultant Pr. Najed Bor’ai Dr. Waheed Abdelmajeed 2005 The Arabic version of this report has been funded by the Ford Foundation. The translation has been funded By The Middle East Partnership Initiative (MEPI). Experts preparing background papers (alphabetical order) Pr. Besma AL Hassen, Electoral System in Jordan Pr. Jihad Aouda, Electoral System in India and Indonesia Pr. Aref Jeffal, Electoral System in Palestine Pr. Abdelhedi Khaouaja, Electoral System in Bahrain Pr. Issam Hassen, Electoral System in Egypt Pr. Marwane Sakr, Electoral System in Lebanon Guide preparation team (alphabetical order) Pr. Rami Mustapha Pr. Ajlane Brahim Pr. Ali Moussa Pr. Karim Essaied Pr. Nevine Mohsen Pr. Houda Chahed Pr. Yasser Fethi Presenters and Comment Makers (alphabetical order) Tharwat Chelbi Issameddine Hassen Juhad Awdat, Ph.D Alaeddine Helal, Ph.D Jilani Kessab Fatma Al Hawaj Ridha Mohamed Hellal Leila Khaouaja, Ph.D Zahda Chami, Ph.D Mohamed Barakat Said Abdelhafedh Mohamed Zahran Said Abdelhami, Ph.DMohamed Awadh Tarek Abdellatif Mohamed Farid Zakaria Adel Alkela Mohamed Kutaichat Aref Jaffel Mohamed Nabil Assem Abdeljabbar, Consultant Hichem Bastouissi, Consultant Special Thanks A very special and warm acknowledgement to the person who initiated the idea of designing this guide, Professor Nejad Bor’ai, a friend but also a legal expert, a political shaker and a brilliant human rights activist. I have heard of him for fifteen years and known him for ten, and I started to know him well, and am still trying to, he is a born researcher interested in public issues, known for his brave positions and wide knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Abuses and UK Assistance to Bahrain 3
    DEBATE PACK Number CDP-0197 | 7 September 2018 Compiled by: Nigel Walker Human rights abuses and Julie Gill Subject specialist: UK assistance to Bahrain Ben Smith Contents 1. Background 2 Westminster Hall 1.1 Human rights in Bahrain 2 Tuesday 11 September 2018 1.2 UK relations with Bahrain 3 9:30-11:00am 2. Press Articles 5 Debate initiated by Andy Slaughter MP 3. Press Releases 7 4. PQs 11 5. Debates 26 6. Early Day Motions 27 7. Press Articles 30 The House of Commons Library prepares a briefing in hard copy and/or online for most non-legislative debates in the Chamber and Westminster Hall other than half-hour debates. Debate Packs are produced quickly after the announcement of parliamentary business. They are intended to provide a summary or overview of the issue being debated and identify relevant briefings and useful documents, including press and parliamentary material. More detailed briefing can be prepared for Members on request to the Library. www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Number CDP-0197, 7 September 2018 1. Background 1.1 Human rights in Bahrain Bahrain is a majority-Shiite country ruled by a Sunni monarchy. Widespread protests in 2011 were seen as a threat to the survival of the monarchy and the response from the authorities was harsh, culminating in a military intervention from the GCC countries, led by Saudi Arabia. The Sunni/Shia rift, an important part of Bahrain’s troubles, is viewed as a microcosm of the broader sectarian contest in the region and of the struggle between Saudi Arabia and Iran.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Reflections on Boycott: Understanding and Interpreting Boycotts in the Arab World
    Conceptual Reflections on Boycott: Understanding and Interpreting Boycotts in the Arab World Michael Schmidmayr* Abstract: Over the past decades, the Arab polities have witnessed some degree of political opening and the enhancement, the reactivation or the mere creation formal political institutions. This clearly forms part of the incumbents’ endeavour to stabilise their authoritarian power through re-legitimization patterns. While many political activists—both from the regime-loyal and the opposition side—have been tempted to play by the new rules, others occasionally decide to stay away from that new formal arena of political engagement, preferring to concentrate on alternative patterns. However, rather than a mere black-and-white picture, political activity can also oscillate between formal and informal mechanisms, partly accepting the system’s rules while rejecting some other elements. A specific tool used in this middle-course strategy is the device of boycott, which has been amply used in Middle Eastern polities in the past. Boycott both addresses the incumbents and the boycotters’ constituencies and potential supporters. While it is certainly used as a tool of political baragaining with the incumbents, it also serves the purpose of upholding support from constituencies and international actors. Despite the amplitude of the phenomenon, however, literature on boycott within authoritarian regimes remains slender; the present study therefore seeks to add some conceptual reflections. This is attempted by conceptualizing the rationales
    [Show full text]