DOCSLIB.ORG

To See the Full Programme for the Battle of Ideas 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
To See the Full Programme for the Battle of Ideas 2017 CONTENTS The Battle of Ideas is an annual festival which 2 Ticket prices and festival information 3 Why the Battle of Ideas? brings together 400-plus speakers for over 3 Registration times 100 debates over the course of the weekend, and through stand-alone satellite events held SATURDAY from September to November throughout the 4 Welcome Address UK and Europe. You can find out more about 4 Saturday Keynote Controversies 6 The Politics of the Personal these satellite events on pages 52–59. 8 Intellectual Life 10 Understanding America This brochure will help you plan and navigate your visit to 12 The New Political Landscape the festival weekend. The debates are organised by room 14 Battle for the Economy or by themed topic areas we call ‘strands’. For example, the 16 Culture Wars ‘Science and Ethics’ strand covers contemporary issues in 18 City Life medicine, genetics and space exploration. The festival is 20 Contemporary Controversies organised so that you can follow one strand throughout the day, or pick and choose debates from different strands on WEEKEND ATTRACTIONS topics that interest you. 22 Battle Specials Whatever you decide to do, with such a wide range of 23 Book Club Salons debates and discussion, we are sure there will be plenty for 24 Lunchtime Shorts everyone to think about. 25 Festival Attractions and Entertainment ESSENTIAL INFORMATION 28 Battlefields: Barbican maps 30 Saturday Timetable 31 Sunday Timetable SUNDAY 32 Sunday Keynote Controversies 34 Eye on the World 36 Debating the Past 38 Law and Order 40 Tech Futures 42 Crisis of Political Language 44 Battle for Education 46 Contemporary Controversies 48 State of the Nation 50 Science and Ethics SATELLITES 52 UK Satellite Events 56 Battle of Ideas Europe 60 Thanks BATTLEOFIDEAS.ORG.UK 1 BOI Brochure 2017 1.7.indd 1 12/10/2017 18:56 BATTLE OF IDEAS TICKETING INFORMATION The Battle of Ideas takes place at the Barbican, London, on Saturday 28 and Sunday 29 October. SPECIAL TICKET OFFER FOR SCHOOL PUPILS HARGRAVE FOUNDATION SCHOOLS CHAMPION WEEKEND RATE A limited number of FREE ONE-DAY tickets are available to Standard ticket £100 school pupils. Standard concession ticket £45 Standard IoI associate ticket £60 Just email [email protected] stating IoI associate concession ticket £40 which day you would like to attend free, the name of your School Students £20 school and give a postal address to send the free ticket to. And Immunocore Student and STEM Under-30 Champion £27.50 if you want to attend the whole weekend you can do so for just £10 for the other day! DAY TICKETS (Saturday or Sunday) Standard ticket £55 GETTING TO THE BARBICAN Standard concession ticket £30 The Barbican is located in the heart of the City of London IoI associate ticket £40 and is accessible by rail, road and underground. The nearest IoI associate concession ticket £25 Underground stations are Barbican, Moorgate and St Paul’s. School Students £10 For more information about accessibility and travel options, visit: barbican.org.uk/your-visit Tickets are available from the Barbican Box Office or online at www.battleofideas.org.uk/tickets INTERNET ACCESS Free wifi: search for WiFi Zone – The Cloud TWITTER IMMUNOCORE STUDENT AND STEM The festival hashtag is #battleofideas and you can follow the UNDER-30 CHAMPION Institute of Ideas @instofideas SPECIAL TICKET OFFER FOR STUDENTS PRESS, PARTNERS AND SPONSORSHIP A limited number of CUT-PRICE weekend tickets for For partnership enquiries or to arrange press passes, request undergraduate and postgraduate students are available for £27.50. interviews and for general media enquiries, please contact Adam Rawcliffe: SPECIAL STEM UNDER-30 TICKET OFFER [email protected] / +44 (0)20 7269 9231 If you are 30 or under, and work in any STEM activity, leading biotechnology company Immunocore is sponsoring weekend FURTHER ENQUIRIES tickets for this year’s Battle of Ideas for £27.50. If you have any questions about Battle of Ideas tickets, contact: Geoff Kidder: [email protected] / +44 (0)20 7269 9220 or Barbican Box Office: +44 (0) 20 7638 8891 2 BOI Brochure 2017 1.7.indd 2 12/10/2017 18:56 WHY THE BATTLE OF IDEAS 2017? WELCOME TO THE BATTLE OF IDEAS 2017 holding people to account by critically engaging with their Society in 2017 is in a very fluid state. There is a palpable views and policies. Yet too often, we walk away, throwing out sense of momentous change in the air. Recent events have cavalier insults as we leave. shown that political life doesn’t follow a preordained script, that democracy throws up unexpected results and voters are BREAKING OUT OF THE ECHO CHAMBERS not a stage army to be called up to give a mandate and then When new Labour MP Laura Pidcock told an interviewer be returned to barracks. If once we were told that we had she would never hang out with Tory women because they reached the ‘end of history’, now there is a sense that the are ‘the enemy’, she caused controversy. But she is not alone centre will not hold - a widespread feeling that, after years of in preferring to avoid engaging her opponents. Too many political failure, the status quo is not good enough. Whether are happy to be confined to the safety of ‘echo chambers’, you are inspired by the likes of Brexit as a democratic unwilling to hear and discuss other points of view. As a rebellion against the establishment, or worried about its consequence, there is an increasing tendency to caricature consequences for stability, this sense of the world order and defame those ‘on the other side’. We promiscuously brand unravelling, of history being made, can be as disorientating as people as terfs, deplorables, white supremacists or Nazis for it is exhilarating. raising awkward questions about identitarian orthodoxies. Brexit voters, who have suffered the consequences of a DEALING WITH UNCOMFORTABLE QUESTIONS stagnating economy for years, are accused of wrecking This new period creates both new uncertainties and UKplc by billionaire business leaders or written off as poorly possibilities right across society. We face uncomfortable educated, xenophobic dupes by enlightened professors. questions about everything from Western values to national sovereignty, from the alleged rise of the far right in Europe In response, it is too easy to lash out and label millions who and America to the pros and cons of automation and Big voted Remain as traitors and elitists if they query the fiasco Data. Establishing a space and willingness to discuss these that passes for Brexit negotiations. Yet whatever side we are on, shifting trends is an essential antidote to knee-jerk posturing, ascribing the most malign of motives to each other can mean whether in response to Islamist terror attacks or the horrific debate is reduced to shallow name-calling and lashing out at tragedy at Grenfell Tower. If ever we needed a sense of straw men. This is less a battle of ideas than a negation of the solidarity, a shared project of opening up public dialogue, to very enterprise of intellectual inquiry and political change. weigh up future options, to reflect on which philosophical and intellectual values matter, it is now. And yet contemporary JOIN THE CONVERSATION trends seem inhospitable to this much-needed robust, grown- The Battle of Ideas festival aims to be different - a uniquely up debate. The free speech wars are intensifying, with ever open forum, where you can meet your ‘enemy’, listen to more restrictions emerging daily on what we can and cannot opinions you have never heard before, argue back, and even say. Accusations of that weasly notion ‘hate speech’, cultural occasionally change your mind. We promise no off-the-shelf appropriation, whitewashing, mansplaining, triggering, etc are answers. More modestly, we bring together a vast range frequently used to chill our ability to discuss freely at the very of international speakers to kick-start passionate, serious- time when we need to talk openly about how we respond to minded discussion and public conversations with free- unprecedented challenges. thinking, inquisitive, opinionated attendees. Between us all, we will try and untangle everything from the bastardisation You don’t have to be a Conservative to agree with Prime of political language to understanding what makes modern Minister Theresa May when she declared to her party America and Brexit Britain tick, beyond the headlines. conference (between coughs and pranks): ‘[We] must come Since 2005, the festival’s slogan has been FREE SPEECH together… to win the battle of ideas in a new generation …at ALLOWED, a crucial rebuttal to today’s climate of offence- stake are the very things we value’. Yes, the stakes are high taking. If you’re willing to challenge and be challenged, and the importance of a battle of ideas has never been more and leave the comfort of the echo chamber, see you at the pressing. However, despite such rhetoric, battling over ideas Barbican on 28 and 29 October. is in jeopardy. Winning others’ hearts and minds means a Claire Fox, director, Institute of Ideas, on behalf of the Battle commitment to persuading those you don’t agree with and of Ideas Committee 2017 REGISTRATION: SATURDAY FROM 08:30, SUNDAY FROM 09:00, LEVEL –1 BATTLEOFIDEAS.ORG.UK 3 BOI Brochure 2017 1.7.indd 3 12/10/2017 18:56 SATURDAY 28 OCTOBER KEYNOTE CONTROVERSIES CINEMA 1 IS THERE A CULTURE WAR DIVERSITY: DOES IT MATTER? KEYNOTE AGAINST POPULISM? 12:00—13:15 CONTROVERSIES 10:00—11:30 These sessions take on some of Do the votes for Brexit and Trump signal Diversity is widely celebrated in the big ideas and themes of our a new populism? While some identify contemporary society.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trans* Politics and the Feminist Project: Revisiting the Politics of Recognition to Resolve Impasses
    Politics and Governance (ISSN: 2183–2463) 2020, Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages 312–320 DOI: 10.17645/pag.v8i3.2825 Article Trans* Politics and the Feminist Project: Revisiting the Politics of Recognition to Resolve Impasses Zara Saeidzadeh * and Sofia Strid Department of Gender Studies, Örebro University, 702 81 Örebro, Sweden; E-Mails: [email protected] (Z.S.), [email protected] (S.S.) * Corresponding author Submitted: 24 January 2020 | Accepted: 7 August 2020 | Published: 18 September 2020 Abstract The debates on, in, and between feminist and trans* movements have been politically intense at best and aggressively hostile at worst. The key contestations have revolved around three issues: First, the question of who constitutes a woman; second, what constitute feminist interests; and third, how trans* politics intersects with feminist politics. Despite decades of debates and scholarship, these impasses remain unbroken. In this article, our aim is to work out a way through these impasses. We argue that all three types of contestations are deeply invested in notions of identity, and therefore dealt with in an identitarian way. This has not been constructive in resolving the antagonistic relationship between the trans* movement and feminism. We aim to disentangle the antagonism within anti-trans* feminist politics on the one hand, and trans* politics’ responses to that antagonism on the other. In so doing, we argue for a politics of status-based recognition (drawing on Fraser, 2000a, 2000b) instead of identity-based recognition, highlighting individuals’ specific needs in soci- ety rather than women’s common interests (drawing on Jónasdóttir, 1991), and conceptualising the intersections of the trans* movement and feminism as mutually shaping rather than as trans* as additive to the feminist project (drawing on Walby, 2007, and Walby, Armstrong, and Strid, 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • The View from the Bridge (Summer 2021)
    The view from the bridge Robin Ramsay Thanks to Nick Must (in particular) and Garrick Alder for editorial and proofreading assistance. *new* SNAFU or FUBAR? I glance at the financial pages of some of the newspapers, mainly to see the latest idiocy that has been allowed to happen. Most recently that has been the collapse of Archegos Capital, one of the many companies using borrowed capital to trade on stock market movements.1 Gambling, in other words. Archegos has gone bust, owing various banks $10 billion. So far, so rather routine. The author of a piece in the Telegraph described what Archegos’ boss Bill Hwang had been doing – his ‘trading strategy’. ‘Hwang was mostly trading through total return swaps. As derivatives go, these are pretty plain vanilla. They give investors exposure to an underlying asset without having to own it (and therefore appear on the regulatory filings that disclose the biggest holders of publicly-listed shares). The other main benefit is that swaps allow you to leverage up the bet. And here lies the crux to this tale: the sheer extent of the leverage that Hwang was running – up to 20 times on some positions, according to reports. This meant that if the shares he was betting on rose 5pc, he’d make a return of 100pc. On the flip side, if they fell 5pc, his entire stake would be wiped out. Which is more or less precisely what happened.’2 1 <https://www.ft.com/content/8062ef53-790f-4470-99d5-265335a72334> The FT report on this was honest enough to include a gambling analogy in the very first sentence, referring to Archeos as having made ‘soured bets’.
    [Show full text]
  • Autonomia Jednostki W Międzynarodowym Prawie
    Agata Wnukiewicz-Kozłowska Wybór tematu recenzowanej monografii należy uznać za wyjątkowo trafny. Aktualność i doniosłość poznawcza podjętej problematyki, a tak- że, co ważne, również jej wartość praktyczna, nie budzą wątpliwości. Syn- tetyczny tytuł pracy jest w pełni adekwatny, dobrze oddaje jej zawartość Agata Wnukiewicz-Kozłowska i główną ideę. [...] Całość rozważań zawartych w monografii koncentruje się na uzasad- nieniu jej głównej tezy o wykształceniu się nowego rodzaju prawa, wywo- Autonomia jednostki w międzynarodowym prawie biomedycznym dzącego się z prawa międzynarodowego publicznego oraz uwzględniają- cego klasyczny kanon praw i wolności jednostki, ale charakteryzującego się istotną odrębnością przedmiotową i specyfiką podmiotową. [...] za- prezentowane w pracy bardzo szerokie uzasadnienie głównej tezy jest wyjątkowo solidne, wszechstronne i przekonywające. Zostało ono oparte Autonomia na imponującym pod względem wielkości i różnorodności materiale ze- branym i wykorzystanym przez Autorkę w toku badań. [...] poza bardzo jednostki licznymi źródłami prawa w ścisłym tego słowa znaczeniu (traktaty, akty w prawa UE, ustawy i inne akty normatywne) w pracy wykorzystano boga- te orzecznictwo sądów międzynarodowych i krajowych, różnego rodzaju międzynarodowym dokumenty, wyniki badań empirycznych, a nawet materiały publicystycz- ne. Autorka dostrzegła i uwzględniła rosnącą, choć ciągle jeszcze niedo- prawie określoną rolę soft law. To bogactwo materiału wykorzystanego w pracy biomedycznym jest jej niewątpliwą zaletą. z recenzji wydawniczej
    [Show full text]
  • An Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis Framework Edited by Olena Hankivsky SUGGESTED CITATION: Hankivsky, O
    Author An Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis Framework Edited by Olena Hankivsky SUGGESTED CITATION: Hankivsky, O. (Ed.). (2012). An Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis Framework. Vancouver, BC: Institute for Intersectionality Research and Policy, Simon Fraser University. This publication is also available online at www.sfu.ca/iirp/ibpa.html CONTACT INFORMATION: Institute for Intersectionality Research and Policy Simon Fraser University, Harbour Centre Campus Room 3274, 515 West Hastings Street Vancouver, B.C. Canada V6B 5K3 Tel: (778) 782-7641 An Intersectionality-Based Email: [email protected] Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Hankivsky, Olena, 1969- Edited by Olena Hankivsky An Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis Framework / Olena Hankivsky (Ed.). Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-0-86491-340-1 Copyright © 2012 by Institute for Intersectionality Research and Policy. All rights reserved. No part of this framework may be reproduced by any means without the written permis- sion of the publisher, except by a reviewer, who may use brief excerpts in a review. The Institute for Intersectionality Research and Policy (IIRP) enables and supports innovative groupings of scholars including interdisciplinary, intersectoral collaborations which foster the generation, application, and policy translation of intersectionality informed research. Please go to www.sfu.ca/iirp for more information. An Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis Framework Edited by Olena Hankivsky Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful and insightful comments on this collection. We would also like to acknowledge and thank participants of the Spring 2011 hosted by the Institute for Intersectionality Research and Policy in Mission, BC for their initial feedback on the IBPA framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Audit: European Parliament Elections 2019: What Will Happen in the North West of England? Page 1 of 7
    Democratic Audit: European Parliament elections 2019: what will happen in the North West of England? Page 1 of 7 European Parliament elections 2019: what will happen in the North West of England? The North West is traditionally a stronghold for Labour, who came first and took three of the region’s eight seats the last time European Parliament elections were held in 2014. This time, however, the Brexit Party are outperforming UKIP’s past success in this area, and will win multiple seats from the region’s majority of pro-Leave voters in the 2016 referendum. The Conservative’s decline opens up a chance for one of the three strong pro-Remain parties to also win a seat, with the Lib Dems looking strongest and the Greens in with a chance of a seat. With voters able to cast only a single vote for a party list, the Democratic Audit team reviews likely outcomes for the parties and the main potentially electable candidates. Liverpool. Photo by Conor Samuel on Unsplash Note: This article was first published on 17 May and updated on 20 May to take into account the latest regional polling data. The North West covers England west of the Pennines, stretching up from its southern borders in Cheshire to sparsely populated Cumbria, bordering Scotland in the north. The key urban centres are Greater Manchester and Merseyside, plus many former industrial towns, but with substantial rural areas also. With eight MEPs the effective threshold for gaining a seat is around 7–9% for smaller parties, depending on how many votes the big two (Labour and Brexit) attract.
    [Show full text]
  • Reclaiming Democracy
    RECLAIMING DEMOCRACY The Left Case for Sovereignty CLAIRE FOX Non-attached Member of the European Parliament for North West England HENRIK OVERGAARD-NIELSEN Non-attached Member of the European Parliament for North West England Reclaiming Democracy The Left Case for Sovereignty Claire Fox; Henrik Overgaard-Nielsen Non-attached members of the European Parliament Production Manager – Samuel Parker, Head of European Affairs to Claire Fox Editor – Mo Lovatt, local assistant to Claire Fox and Henrik Overgaard-Nielsen Authors (in alphabetical order) Sabine Beppler-Spahl, Tom Bewick, Philip Cunliffe, Claire Fox, Maurice Glasman, John Mills, Henrik Overgaard-Nielsen, Peter Ramsay, Steve Roberts, Alka Sehgal Cuthbert Proofreading Rob Lyons, Academy of Ideas Designer Winter Design Printer Craig Johnston With thanks to Allan Vesterlund, Head of Office to Henrik Overgaard-Nielsen Tony Brown, European Parliament policy advisor Non-attached members of the European Parliament are those members of the Parliament not formally associated with the primary legislative groups and coalitions that exercise official authority in the Commission or in the Parliamentary chamber. Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this publication are personal and do not reflect the views of the European Parliament or the Brexit Party. RECLAIMING DEMOCRACY The Left Case for Sovereignty “What power have you got? Where did you get it from? In whose interests do you use it? To whom are you accountable? How do we get rid of you? Anyone who cannot answer the last of those questions does
    [Show full text]
  • African Diasporic and Indigenous Youth Alliance Building for HIV Prevention
    Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society Vol. 4, No. 2, 2015, pp. 76-102 Beyond the colonial divide: African diasporic and Indigenous youth alliance building for HIV prevention Ciann L. Wilson York University Sarah Flicker York University Jean-Paul Restoule University of Toronto Abstract African diasporic and North American Indigenous communities have both been greatly impacted by the colonization of the Americas. Historic and contemporary relations between these communities have been fraught with complex commonalities, contradictions and conflicts. These communities have remained connected across time and space through their shared and distinct histories of resistance and oppression. Both communities have suffered the embodiment of systemic violence in the form of elevated rates of communicable and chronic diseases such as HIV. This paper examines the decolonizing potential of collaboration between these two communities in their response to HIV. It begins by unpacking the history of racialized subjugation faced by Indigenous and African, Caribbean and Black communities in the Americas, with a focus on Canada. This background contextualizes empirical findings of an arts- based intervention that explored notions of identity, resistance and solidarity building between young people in these groups. Keywords: Black; Indigenous; youth, HIV Prevention; art and community-based research; solidarity 2015 C. Wilson, S. Flicker & J. Restoule This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0), permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. African diasporic and Indigenous alliance building 77 Introduction African diasporic and North American Indigenous communities have felt the harmful impacts of colonization for generations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anarchists
    The Anarchists Loma Cuevas-Hewitt 2016 Contents Red to Black ......................................... 5 The older generation ................................. 6 The younger generation ................................ 9 Organising without leaders .............................. 11 Archipelagic confederationalism .............................. 15 Xenophilia ....................................... 17 Translocalism ..................................... 20 Green-Black solidarity ................................ 24 Conclusion .......................................... 25 2 Anarchism’s history ‘has been that of a suppressed alternative… forced to subsist in the shad- ows of Marxism’ (May 1994, p. 44). This was true up until the Crisis of the Left; that pointat which communist movements found the tide turning against them. This then opened a space for a revivification of anarchist projects worldwide. As anarchist anthropologist David Graeber (2004b, p. 330) observed, [a]narchist or anarchist-inspired movements are growing everywhere; anarchist principles — autonomy, voluntary association, self-organisation, mutual aid, direct democracy — have become the basis for organising within the [Alternative] Glob- alisation Movement and beyond, taking the place that Marxism had in the social movements of the Sixties. Although writing from North America, Graeber’s assertions are not inapplicable to the Philip- pines, where, in the Eighties and Nineties, many defectors from the Maoist insurgency found that their critiques of the CPP-NPA strongly resonated
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Intersectionality
    Teaching Intersectionality Teaching Teaching Intersectionality: Putting Gender in the Centre How to deal with gender, women, gender roles, feminism and gender equality in teaching practices? The ATHENA thematic network brings together specialists in women’s and gender studies, feminist research, women’s rights, gender equality and diversity. In the book series ‘Teaching with Gender’ the partners in this network have collected articles on a wide range of teaching practices in the field of gender. The books in this series address challenges and possibilities of teaching about women and gender in a wide range of educational contexts. The authors discuss pedagogical, theoretical and political dimensions of learning and teaching on women and gender. The books in this series contain teaching material, reflections on feminist pedagogies, practical discussions about the development of gender- sensitive curricula in specific fields. All books address the crucial aspects of education in Europe today: increasing international mobility, growing importance of interdisciplinarity and the many practices of life-long learning and training that take place outside the traditional programmes of higher education. These books will be indispensable tools for educators who take serious the challenge of teaching with gender. (for titles see inside cover) Martha Franken, Alison Woodward, Anna Cabó, and Barbara M. Bagilhole Martha Alison Woodward, Franken, The concept of intersectionality is at the heart of debates about the future of equality policies in Europe. How do different identities interact and affect the opportunities for individuals and groups in society? Public policy used to focus on one or another aspect of equality, such as gender, sexual orientation or physical abilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Shifting Intersections: Fluidity of Gender and Race in Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’S Americanah Mary Margaret Bonvillain Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2016 Shifting intersections: Fluidity of gender and race in Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s Americanah Mary Margaret Bonvillain Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Bonvillain, Mary Margaret, "Shifting intersections: Fluidity of gender and race in Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s Americanah" (2016). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 16435. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/16435 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Shifting intersections: Fluidity of gender and race in Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s Americanah by Mary Margaret Bonvillain A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Major: English (Literature) Program of Study Committee Michèle A. Schaal, Major Professor Brianna Burke Yalem Teshome Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2016 Copyright © Mary Margaret Bonvillain, 2016. All rights reserved. ii DEDICATION “No subject posits itself spontaneously and at once as the inessential from the outset; it is not the Other who, defining itself
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Science Media Centre and the Insurance Industry in ME/CFS: the Facts Behind the Fiction
    The Role of the Science Media Centre and the Insurance Industry in ME/CFS: the facts behind the fiction Professor Malcolm Hooper September 2013 Some of the content of this document is already in the public domain; it was, however, commissioned for lawyers and high-profile others who had no knowledge of the background behind the ME/CFS controversy specifically to provide for them in a single document the facts relating to the Science Media Centre and its acknowledged campaign against people with ME/CFS, as well as the SMC’s relationship with the Wessely School and their relationship with the permanent health insurance industry. This document is in 6 sections: Section 1 sets out the facts behind the Science Media Centre (SMC). Section 2 considers the link between the SMC and key players in the ME/CFS controversy (whose own links with the permanent health insurance industry cause senior Parliamentarians serious concern). Section 3 considers how the SMC is supporting and publicly promoting in the media certain mental health professionals who are acting in contravention of Department of Health policy. Section 4 provides evidence of the SMC’s campaign to discredit people with ME/CFS. Section 5 provides evidence of the SMC’s misrepresentation of the PACE trial results to the media. The Conclusion considers how the SMC can credibly claim to represent “science” when it ignores so much science. Section 1: The Science Media Centre (Founder Member: Simon Wessely) The Science Media Centre (SMC) began work in 2002 under New Labour to operate like a newsroom for national and local media when science stories hit the headlines.
    [Show full text]
  • Care of Dying Children and Adults. Ethics, Principles and Issues for Law Reform
    Catholic Medical Quarterly Volume 68(3) August 2018 www.cmq.org.uk Care of dying children and adults. Ethics, principles and issues for law reform Dr Adrian Treloar, FRCP, MRCPych, MRCGP Background The cases of Alfie Evans, Charlie Gard, Charlotte Wyatt, David Glass and Ayesha King have all hit headlines and reverberated around the world. Many have been shocked to see doctors applying to the courts in order to curtail treatment against the clearly expressed wishes of the child's parents. Fierce public debates have raged about the appropriateness of withdrawing treatment but even more strongly about also the denial of parents’ wishes when plans they have made for their child do not appear unreasonable. Whilst public debate on the appropriateness of withdrawing treatment from the child has been fierce that debate has been yet more fierce on the denial of the parents' wishes to have the treatment continued even though their wishes do not appear unreasonable My conclusion is that while limitation of treatment and withdrawal of some treatments is appropriate, the de facto removal of parental authority as a result of referral to the High Court is wrong, and deeply unjust. As well as that, I argue that, in the case of Alfie Evans, the decision by the High Court to deny transfer to other care facilities is deeply concerning and should not have happened. Key issues in the care of dying children and adults Underlying those conclusions and within all the complexity of the debates there are several key issues each of which I explore further in this paper.
    [Show full text]