DOCSLIB.ORG

Law and Supreme Court of Constitution Ave and Justice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Law and Supreme Court of Constitution Ave and Justice Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan Supreme Court of Pakistan Building Constitution Avenue, Islamabad www.ljcp.gov.pk Judicial Statistics of Pakistan, Annual Report 2017 Table of Contents Foreword: ................................................................................................................................... 11 Overview of Performance of Superior Courts and District Judiciary during the year 2017 ........ 13 Supreme Court of Pakistan ......................................................................................................... 17 Composition of the Court & Appointment of Judges .........................................................17 Jurisdiction of the Court ...................................................................................................17 The Court Administration .................................................................................................17 The Human Rights Cell .....................................................................................................18 The Supreme Judicial Council ...........................................................................................18 1.1 Hon'ble Chief Justice of Pakistan and Hon’ble Judges, Supreme Court of Pakistan as on 31-12-2017 ..................................................................................................................19 1.2 Hon'ble Judges of the Supreme Court of Pakistan Retired during the Year 2017 .................19 1.3 Sanctioned and working strength of the officers and officials of the Supreme Court of Pakistan as on 31-12-2017 ................................................................................................20 1.4 Budget Allocation for the Supreme Court of Pakistan during the financial year 2017- 18 ....................................................................................................................................22 1.5 Consolidated Statement Showing Pendency Institution, Disposal and Balance of Cases in the Supreme Court during 2017 ...........................................................................23 1.6 Bench wise consolidated statement showing Pendency, Institution, Disposal and Balance of cases in the Supreme Court of Pakistan during the Year 2017 ...........................24 1.7 Pendency, Institution, Disposal and Balance of Petitions in the Supreme Court of Pakistan during the Year 2017 ..........................................................................................24 1.8 Pendency, Institution, Disposal and Balance of Appeals in the Supreme Court of Pakistan during the Year 2017 ..........................................................................................24 1.9 Pendency, Institution, Disposal and Balance of other cases in the Supreme Court of Pakistan during the Year 2017 ..........................................................................................24 1.10 Category-wise Institution, Disposal and Balance of Cases at the Principal Seat and Branch Registries of the Supreme Court of Pakistan during the Year 2017 .........................25 Federal Shariat Court .................................................................................................................. 33 2.1 Ho n'ble Judges of the Federal Shariat Court as on 31-12-2017 ..........................................34 2.2 Hon'ble Judges of the Federal Shariat Court Retired during the Year 2017 .........................34 2.3 Sanctioned and Working Strength of the Officers and Officials of the Federal Shariat Court on 31-12-2017 ........................................................................................................34 2.4 Consolidated Statement Showing Status of Complaints and Penalties against Officers/ Officials of the Federal Shariat Court during the Year 2017 .................................37 2.5 Budget Allocation for the Federal Shariat Court for the Financial Year 2017 - 18. ...............37 2.6 Consolidated Statement Showing Category-Wise Pendency, Institution, Disposal and Balance of Cases in the Federal Shariat Court during the year 2017 ...................................38 i Judicial Statistics of Pakistan, Annual Report 2017 2.7 Consolidated Statement Showing Category-Wise Pendency, Institution, Disposal and Balance of Cases in the Federal Shariat Court during the year 2017 ...................................39 2.8 Category-wise Pendency, Institution, Disposal and Balance of Cases in the Federal Shariat Court, Principal Seat and Bench Registries during the Year 2017 ............................39 2.9 Pendency, Institution, Disposal and Balance of Cases in the Federal Shariat Court, Principal Seat During the last 10 years ..............................................................................41 2.10 Pendency, Institution, Disposal and Balance of Cases in the Federal Shariat Court, Lahore Bench Registry During the last 10 years .................................................................41 2.11 Pendency, Institution, Disposal and Balance of Cases in the Federal Shariat Court, Karachi Bench Registry During the last 10 years ................................................................41 2.12 Pendency, Institution, Disposal and Balance of Cases in the Federal Shariat Court, Peshawar Bench Registry During the last 10 years .............................................................42 2.13 Pendency, Institution, Disposal and Balance of Cases in the Federal Shariat Court, Quetta Bench Registry During the last 10 years .................................................................42 Lahore High Court, Lahore .......................................................................................................... 43 Composition of the Court and Appointment of Judges ......................................................45 Jurisdiction ......................................................................................................................46 3.1 Hon'ble Judges of the Lahore High Court as on 31-12-2017 ................................................46 3.2 Hon'ble Judges of the Lahore High Court Elevated to the Supreme Court of Pakistan during the Year 2017 ........................................................................................................48 3.3 Hon'ble Judges of the Lahore High Court Retired during the Year 2017 ..............................48 3.4 Statement Showing the Sanctioned and Working Strength Principal Seat and Allied Benches of the Lahore High Court as on 31-12-2017 ..........................................................49 3.5 Statement Showing the Sanctioned and Working Strength Principal Seat and Allied Benches of the Lahore High Court as on 31-12-2017 ..........................................................54 3.6 Consolidated statement showing status of complaints and penalties imposed upon officers/officials of the Lahore High Court, Lahore during the years 2017 ..........................62 3.7 Budget Allocation for the Lahore High Court and the District Judiciary of Punjab for the Year 2017-18 ..............................................................................................................62 3.8 Consolidated statement showing status of complaints and penalties imposed upon officers/officials of the Lahore High Court and the District Judiciary during the the year 2017 .........................................................................................................................63 3.9 Consolidated Statement Showing Pendency, Institution, Disposal and Balance of Cases in the Lahore High Court during 2017 ......................................................................64 3.10 Consolidated Statement Showing Pendency, Institution, Disposal and Balance of Cases in the Lahore High Court and its Benches during the Year 2017 ................................65 3.11 Category-wise Pendency, Institution, Disposal and Balance of Cases in the Lahore High Court during the Year 2017 .......................................................................................66 3.12 Consolidated Statement Showing Pendency, Institution, Disposal and Balance of Cases in the Lahore High Court, Principal seat, Lahore during the last 10 years ..................68 ii Judicial Statistics of Pakistan, Annual Report 2017 3.13 Pendency, Institution, Disposal and Balance of Cases in the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench Registry, Lahore during the last 10 years ...............................................68 3.14 Pendency, Institution, Disposal and Balance of Cases in the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench Registry, Lahore during the last 10 years ....................................................69 3.15 Pendency, Institution, Disposal and Balance of Cases in the Lahore High Court, Bahawalpur Bench Registry, Lahore during the last 10 years .............................................69 3.16 District-wise Sanctioned and Working Strength of Judicial Officers in Punjab Province as on 31-12-2017 ..............................................................................................................73 3.17 Consolidated Statement Showing Pendency, Institution, Disposal and Balance of Cases in the District Judiciary of Punjab during 2017 .........................................................75 3.18 District-wise Institution, Transferred, Disposal and Balance of Civil Cases of Civil Courts in the District Judiciary of Punjab during the Year 2017 ..........................................76 3.19 District-wise Institution,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pakistan-U.S. Relations
    Pakistan-U.S. Relations K. Alan Kronstadt Specialist in South Asian Affairs July 1, 2009 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33498 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Pakistan-U.S. Relations Summary A stable, democratic, prosperous Pakistan actively combating religious militancy is considered vital to U.S. interests. U.S. concerns regarding Pakistan include regional and global terrorism; Afghan stability; democratization and human rights protection; the ongoing Kashmir problem and Pakistan-India tensions; and economic development. A U.S.-Pakistan relationship marked by periods of both cooperation and discord was transformed by the September 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States and the ensuing enlistment of Pakistan as a key ally in U.S.-led counterterrorism efforts. Top U.S. officials praise Pakistan for its ongoing cooperation, although long-held doubts exist about Islamabad’s commitment to some core U.S. interests. Pakistan is identified as a base for terrorist groups and their supporters operating in Kashmir, India, and Afghanistan. Pakistan’s army has conducted unprecedented and, until recently, largely ineffectual counterinsurgency operations in the country’s western tribal areas, where Al Qaeda operatives and pro-Taliban militants are said to enjoy “safe haven.” U.S. officials increasingly are concerned that indigenous religious extremists represent a serious threat to the stability of the Pakistani state. The United States strongly encourages maintenance of a bilateral cease-fire and a continuation of substantive dialogue between Pakistan and neighboring India, which have fought three wars since 1947. A perceived Pakistan-India nuclear arms race has been the focus of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Address by Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry Chief Justice
    ADDRESS BY MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY CHIEF JUSTICE OF PAKISTAN AT THE EARTH-BREAKING CEREMONY OF ISLAMBAD HIGH COURT, ISLAMABAD ON 5th November, 2013 My brother Judges of the Supreme Court; Hon’ble Chief Justice and Judges of Islamabad High Court; Worthy President and office bearers of the Supreme Court and High Court Bar Association; Distinguished Members of the Bar; Ladies and Gentlemen! Assalamualaikum: It is an occasion of extreme pleasure for me to address today the august gathering of bench and bar in this earth-breaking ceremony of Islamabad High Court at the Constitution Avenue, Islamabad. The establishment of Islamabad High Court in its own premises was badly needed to provide congenial working environment for Judges, lawyers and litigant parties. The improvement in the justice sector cannot be achieved through one time struggle, it is, rather a continuous process. The legal and judicial institutions play a pivotal role in ensuring supremacy of Constitution, rule of law and protection of rights of the citizens. It was long standing demand of the lawyers’ community as well as litigant public that all the Courts must be situated at one place or at least close to each other. With the construction of new building of Islamabad High Court at sector G-5, very close to the Supreme Court and Federal Shariat Court would save the lawyers as well as litigants from the agony of travelling long distances to reach from one Court to another. The existence of Supreme Court, Federal Shariat Court and High Court in close proximity, besides convenience, is also necessary for security reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr.Justice Salahuddin Mirza ACADEMIC QUALIFICATION
    Mr.Justice Salahuddin Mirza 08.01.2007 to 07.01.2010 ACADEMIC QUALIFICATION • Matriculation in 1950 from Sindh University (B.V.S. Parsi High School, Karachi). • Intermediate and B.A. from Sindh Muslim College Karachi in 1954. • L.L.B from Sindh Muslim Law College in 1958. • Appeared in the P.C.S. (Judicial Branch) examination of the West Pakistan Public Service Commission in 1959 and qualified the same, standing first in English language. EXPERIENCE • On appointment, his services were placed at the disposal of Lahore Bench of West Pakistan High Court. • First posting at Multan in 1960. Further postings in Lahore, Pakpattan and again in Lahore and Dera Ghazi Khan. • On the break-up of one Unit in 1970, the all West Pakistan Services were bifurcated on the basis of domicile and, since his domicile was of Karachi. • He was repatriated to Sindh and posted in Thatta as Civil Judge and FCM. • Promoted as Additional District & Sessions Judge and posted in Karachi from 1972 to 1974 and at Larkana from 1975 to 1976. • Served as Judge of the Labour Court Sukkur (1977-79) and Judge of Labour Court at Karachi (1979 to 1981). • Promoted as District and Sessions Judge in 1980. • Served in the Law Division, Ministry of Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Islamabad, as Deputy Solicitor/Joint Secretary from February 1981 to March, 1985. • On completion of deputation in the Law Division was posted at Karachi as Chairman Appellate Tribunal (Local Councils) where he served from April, 1985, to April,1988. • Served as the Registrar of the Sindh High Court from April 1988 to September, 1988, when elevated to the High Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Order Sheet in the Islamabad High Court, Islamabad
    Form No: HCJD/C-121 ORDER SHEET IN THE ISLAMABAD HIGH COURT, ISLAMABAD (JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT) W. P. No.676/2017 Shahzada Sikandar ul Mulk & 4 others Versus The Capital Development Authority & 4 others Petitioners by : Dr. Muhammad Aslam Khakhi, Advocate. Syed Asghar Hussain Sabwari, Advocate. Dr Babar Awan, Advocate. Mr Sajjar Abbas Hamdani, Advocate. Mr Qausain Faisal Mufti, Advocate. Mr Tajammal Hussain Lathi, Advocate. Malik Zafar Husain, Advocate. Mr Ishtiaq Ahmed Raja, Advocate. Ms Kalsoom Rafique, Advocate. Ms Yasmin Haider, Advocate. Respondents by : Mr Fiaz Ahmed Anjum Jandran, Advocate. Mr Babar Sattar, Advocate. Mr Sultan Mazhar Sher, Advocate. Mr Waqar Hassan Janjua, Advocate. Malik Qamar Afzal, Advocate. Mr Khurram Mehmood Qureshi, Advocate. Mr Muhammad Anwar Mughal, Advocate. Ch. Hafeez Ullah Yaqoob, Advocate. Mr Muhammad Waqas Malik, Advocate. Mr Amjad Zaman, Advocate. Mr Muhammad Khalid Zaman, Advocate. Mr Mujeeb ur Rehman Kiani, Advocate. Barrister Jehangir Khan Jadoon, Advocate. Malik Mazhar Javed, Advocate. Raja Inam Amin Minhas, Advocate. Ch. Waqas Zamir, Advocate. Fazal ur Rehman, Advocate. Ms Zaitoon Hafeez, Advocate. -2- W.P No.676/2017 Ms Zainab Janjua, Advocate. Barrister Amna Abbas, Advocate. Ms Ayesha Ahmed, Advocate. Mr Kashif Ali Malik, Advocate. Mr Amir Latif Gill, Advocate. Mr Tariq Mehmood Jehangiri, Advocate General, Islamabad Capital Territory. Mr Awais Haider Malik, State Counsel. Mr Asad Mehboob Kiyani, Member (P&D), Mr Zafar Iqbal, Director (Master Plan), Mr Faraz Malik, Director (HS), Sh. Ijaz, Director (Urban Planning), Mr Arshad Chohan, Director (Rural Planning), for Capital Development Authority. Mr Mehrban Ali, & Arbab Ali, Zoologists on behalf of Secretary, M/o Climate Change. Date of Hearing : 19-04-2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Honour Killing in Sindh Men's and Women's Divergent Accounts
    Honour Killing in Sindh Men's and Women's Divergent Accounts Shahnaz Begum Laghari PhD University of York Women’s Studies March 2016 Abstract The aim of this project is to investigate the phenomenon of honour-related violence, the most extreme form of which is honour killing. The research was conducted in Sindh (one of the four provinces of Pakistan). The main research question is, ‘Are these killings for honour?’ This study was inspired by a need to investigate whether the practice of honour killing in Sindh is still guided by the norm of honour or whether other elements have come to the fore. It is comprised of the experiences of those involved in honour killings through informal, semi- structured, open-ended, in-depth interviews, conducted under the framework of the qualitative method. The aim of my thesis is to apply a feminist perspective in interpreting the data to explore the tradition of honour killing and to let the versions of the affected people be heard. In my research, the women who are accused as karis, having very little redress, are uncertain about their lives; they speak and reveal the motives behind the allegations and killings in the name of honour. The male killers, whom I met inside and outside the jails, justify their act of killing in the name of honour, culture, tradition and religion. Drawing upon interviews with thirteen women and thirteen men, I explore and interpret the data to reveal their childhood, educational, financial and social conditions and the impacts of these on their lives, thoughts and actions.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL ASSEMBLY SECRETARIAT ———— “QUESTIONS for ORAL ANSWERS and THEIR REPLIES” to Be Asked A
    1 (31st Session) NATIONAL ASSEMBLY SECRETARIAT ———— “QUESTIONS FOR ORAL ANSWERS AND THEIR REPLIES” to be asked at a sitting of the National Assembly to be held on Wednesday, the 13th April, 2016 135. *Mr. Sufyan Yousuf: (Deferred during 29th Session) Will the Minister In-charge of the Climate Change be pleased to state: (a) whether it is a fact that the high level of lead and arsenic found in the Indus River bodies; (b) whether it is also fact that water of said River is being contaminated with the said chemicals; (c) if the answers to parts (a) and (b) above are in the affirmative, the steps taken by the Government in this regard? Transferred to Science and Technology Division for answer on next rota day. 227. *Sahibzada Tariq Ullah: (Deferred during 29th Session) Will the Minister In-charge of the Cabinet Division be pleased to state: (a) the steps taken by the Government for promotion and development of the present tourists spots in the country during the last three years; and (b) whether there is any proposal under consideration of the Government to establish new tourist resorts in the country; if so, the locations thereof? 2 Minister In-charge of the Cabinet Division: (a) The following steps have been taken for promotion of tourism in the country during last three years: 1. To involve youth of country and promotion of tourism in the country, PTDC launched Pakistan Tourism Friends Club. 2. PTDC singed MoUs with University of Management and Technology and King Edward Medical College for joint promotion of tourism in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Shariʿa the Politics of Islamic Judicial Review by Shoaib
    Defining Shariʿa The Politics of Islamic Judicial Review By Shoaib A. Ghias A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Jurisprudence and Social Policy in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Malcolm M. Feeley, Chair Professor Martin M. Shapiro Professor Asad Q. Ahmed Summer 2015 Defining Shariʿa The Politics of Islamic Judicial Review © 2015 By Shoaib A. Ghias Abstract Defining Shariʿa: The Politics of Islamic Judicial Review by Shoaib A. Ghias Doctor of Philosophy in Jurisprudence and Social Policy University of California, Berkeley Professor Malcolm M. Feeley, Chair Since the Islamic resurgence of the 1970s, many Muslim postcolonial countries have established and empowered constitutional courts to declare laws conflicting with shariʿa as unconstitutional. The central question explored in this dissertation is whether and to what extent constitutional doctrine developed in shariʿa review is contingent on the ruling regime or represents lasting trends in interpretations of shariʿa. Using the case of Pakistan, this dissertation contends that the long-term discursive trends in shariʿa are determined in the religio-political space and only reflected in state law through the interaction of shariʿa politics, regime politics, and judicial politics. The research is based on materials gathered during fieldwork in Pakistan and datasets of Federal Shariat Court and Supreme Court cases and judges. In particular, the dissertation offers a political-institutional framework to study shariʿa review in a British postcolonial court system through exploring the role of professional and scholar judges, the discretion of the chief justice, the system of judicial appointments and tenure, and the political structure of appeal that combine to make courts agents of the political regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2011
    2012-14 ANNUAL REPORT Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan, Supreme Court Building, Constitution Avenue, Islamabad THE ANNUAL REPORTS ARE ALSO AVAILABLE ON THE COMMISSION’S WEBSITE. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE COMMISSION’S SECRETARIAT AT THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: LAW AND JUSTICE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN SUPREME COURT BUILDING CONSTITUTION AVENUE ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN TEL: 092-51-9208752 FAX: 092-51-9214797 092-51-9214416 EMAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: www.ljcp.gov.pk TABLE OF CONTENTS S. # CONTENTS PAGE NUMBER Foreword Introduction 1. Profiles of Chairmen and Members of Law and Justice Commission 6 of Pakistan 1.1 Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, 6 Chief Justice of Pakistan 1.2 Mr. Justice Tassaduq Hussain Jillani, 9 Chief Justice of Pakistan 1.3 Mr. Justice Nasir-ul-Mulk 17 Chief Justice of Pakistan 1.4 Mr. Justice Agha Rafiq Ahmed Khan 18 Chief Justice, Federal Shariat Court 1.5 Mr. Justice Sardar Muhammad Raza 20 Chief Justice, Federal Shariat Court 1.6 Mr. Justice Sh. Azmat Saeed 21 Chief Justice, Lahore High Court 1.7 Mr. Justice Mushir Alam 22 Chief Justice, High Court of Sindh 1.8 Mr. Justice Dost Muhammad Khan 23 Chief Justice, Peshawar High Court 1.9 Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial 24 Chief Justice, Lahore High Court 1.10 Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa 25 Chief Justice, High Court of Balochistan 1.11 Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar, 26 Chief Justice, High Court of Sindh 1.12 Mr. Justice Mian Fasih-ul-Mulk 27 Chief Justice, Peshawar High Court 1.13 Mr. Justice Muhammad Anwar Khan Kasi 28 Chief Justice, Islamabad High Court 1.14 Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Judgments in CA.183-K/11 = Dt
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) PRESENT: MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI MR. JUSTICE ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA MR. JUSTICE AMIR HANI MUSLIM CRL. ORIGINAL PETITION NO.89/2011, CMA.309-K/2012, CMA.310-K/2012, Crl.M.As. 42-K/2012, 80-K/2012, 87-K/2012, 13-K/2013, CMA.2453/13, Crl. MA.29- K/2013, CMA.131-K/2013, Crl.M.As.185-K/2012, 225/2013, 226/2013, 227/2013, CMAs.244-K TO 247-K/2013, 257-K & 258-K/2013, Crl.M.A, 263/2013, Crl.MA. 282 IN CRL. ORIGINAL PETITION NO.89/2011. CONSTITUTION PETITION NO.71/2011, CMAs. 5547/2013, 2560/2013, 2561- 2565/2013, 2112-2113/2013, 2706-2707/2013, IN CONST. PETITION NO.71/2011. CONSTITUTION PETITIONS NO.21/2013, 23/2003 & 24/2013. CIVIL PETITION NO.6-K/2011 & CMA. NO.278-K/2011, CIVIL APPEALS NO.98-K/2010, 100-K/2010, 12-K/2012 A/W CRL. M.As. 51-K TO 53-K/2012, CMA. 2014/2013, CIVIL APPEAL NO.131-K/2010 A/W 241-K/2012. & CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 183-K TO 185-K/2011. CRL.M.A. 252/2013 IN CRL.M.A.98/2012 IN CRL.M.A. 339/2012. H.R.C. NO. 12995-S/2011 AND H.R.C NO. 2103-G/2011 (On appeal against the judgments in CA.183-K/11 = dt. 17.02.2011, SST, Kcy. in SA.39/2008, CA.12-K/12 = dt. 14.04.2011, SHC, Kcy in Const.P.D-932/09, CA.98/2010 = dt.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Cold Countries
    of Cold Countries iy hifcvests, sometimes moneylenders, £ sometimes calamities, self-styled masters arrive. to hate my torrid country, i dry my wet clothes in these courtyards let me plant gold wheat in its fields let me quench my thirst at its rivers let me rest beneath the shade of its trees .let me wear its dust and wrap its distances around me i«: The sun and you can not walk side by side. The sun has chosen me for company. J Kishwar Nahecd, translated by Rukhsana Ahmad. Introduction ocated in the north-west of the South LAsian sub-continent, Pakistan is a relatively new political entity. Comprising four provinces (North West Frontier Province, Sindh, Punjab and Baluchistan) and the tribal areas, northern areas, and the state of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan represents a great diversity of topography, bio- climates, peoples, and cultures. The rural-urban division is sharp, as are the disparities between the rich and the poor. The land was the home of ancient civilisations and the meeting point of great cultures: Buddhist, Greek, Muslim, and Hindu. Consequently, Pakistan has a rich heritage of architecture, folklore, art, and music. Its people share the common traits of hospitality, warmth, and Village in Sindh province. Life in the villages of Pakistan has changed friendliness, and a strong sense of dignity. little over the centuries. Born in the ferment of change that accompanied the collapse of colonialism, Pakistan is still a society in transition. Busy street scene in Karachi, the largest city in Pakistan. Older forms of economic, social, and political organisation are under challenge, while new ones have yet to evolve.
    [Show full text]
  • In Pursuance of the 18Th Amendment to the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 a Judicial Commission Has Been Proposed to Be Created To
    In pursuance of the 18th amendment to the constitution of Pakistan 1973 a judicial commission has been proposed to be created to recommend the appointment of Judges of the superior Courts in Pakistan. Following is the text of the Article 175 (A) which has been inserted in the constitution of Pakistan through 18th amendment. Article 175A. Appointment of Judges to the Supreme Court, High Courts and the Federal Shariat Court (1) There shall be a Judicial Commission of Pakistan, hereinafter in this Article referred to as the Commission, for appointment of Judges of the Supreme Court, High Courts and the Federal Shariat Court, as hereinafter provided. (2) For appointment of Judges of the Supreme Court, the Commission shall consist of--- (i) Chief Justice of Pakistan; Chairman (ii) [four] most senior Judges of the Supreme Court;Member (iii) a former Chief Justice or a former Judge of the Supreme Court of Pakistan to be nominated by the Chief Justice of Pakistan, in consultation with the [four] member Judges, for a term of two years; Member (iv) Federal Minister for Lawand Justice;Member (v) Attorney-General for Pakistan; and Member (vi) a Senior Advocate of the Supreme Court of Pakistan nominated by the Pakistan Bar Council for a term of two years.Member (3) Nowithstanding anything contained in clause (1) or clause (2), the President shall appoint the most senior Judge of the Supreme Court as the Chief Justice of Pakistan. (4) The Commission may make rules regulating its procedure. (5) For appointment of Judges of a High Court, the Commission
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Report Lawyher.Pk
    The State of Women’s Representation in Law 2020-21 Baseline Report 1 © 2021 Lawyher.pk. All rights reserved. Any part of this publication may be reproduced by duly acknowledging the source. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the contents of this publication. Lawyher.pk takes no responsibility for any unintentional omissions. Lawyher.pk has reproduced the images included in this publication under a fair-use policy, intending no copyright infringement, and has credited all sources. All data has been obtained from official sources including official websites, official correspondence and communications with concerned officials and official publications such as directories. The sources and the date at which the information was obtained have been cited in the report along with the data. Any limitations have also been highlighted in the footnotes and accompanying notes. Lawyher.pk Suite No. 33 First Floor Sadiq Plaza Shahrah e Quaid e Azam Lahore, Pakistan. E: [email protected] | www.lawyher.pk Written by: Nida Usman Chaudhary Design and Layout: Ali Abbas 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study would not have been possible without the support of the Federal Ministry of Law and Justice, Australian High Commission, British High Commission, Group Development Pakistan, Parliamentary Secretary, Federal Ministry of Law and Justice, Ms. Maleeka Bokhari, Ms. Valerie Khan, Executive Director, Group Development Pakistan, Mr. Usman Arshad, Ms. Eshm Suhaib, coordinator for the project increasing women’s representation in law, Ms. Sara Raza, Advocate and volunteer on the project increasing women’s representation in law. We also want to acknowledge the support from Mr. Faisal Siddiqui ASC, Mr.
    [Show full text]