DOCSLIB.ORG

Transportation System Plan 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transportation System Plan 2011 Coos County Transportation System Plan March 2011 Prepared for Coos County 250 N. Baxter Coquille, OR 97423 Prepared by David Evans and Associates, Inc. 2100 SW River Parkway Portland, Oregon ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This Coos County Transportation System Plan (TSP) update was funded by Coos County and the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). The goals, objectives, and overall decision process was guided by the County and ODOT management team, as well as supporting members of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), and Consultant Team identified below. Coos County Management Team Patty Evernden, Planning Director John Rowe, Roadmaster Advisory Committee Members (TAC & CAC) Bruce Bennett, Coos County Area Transit Charlie Waterman, Coos County Planning Rocky Buckles, Thomas & Sons/C.B.&Y Terry Mai, Coquille Chamber of Commerce Rodger Craddock, Coos County Joanna Lyons, Coos County Michelle Hampton, City of Bandon Oubonh White, Coos County Counsel Sharon Shinnick, Coos County Road Joanna Lyons, Coos County Counsel Department Timm Slater, Coos Bay/Charleston/North George Gant, Coos County Planning Bend COC Kevin Stufflebean, Coos County Board of Terrence O’Conner, City of Coquille Commissioners ODOT Management Team Mike Baker, Region 3 Planning Manager Allie Krull, Project Manager Consultant Team – David Evans and Associates, Inc. Adam Argo, AICP Gigi Cooper, AICP Jennifer Danziger, P.E. Joshan Rohani, P.E. John Stutesman, AICP Anneke Van der Mast, AICP Coos County Transportation System Plan March 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 Study Area .............................................................................................................................. 1-1 Planning Process .................................................................................................................... 1-1 2. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................ 2-1 Goal 1: Mobility ...................................................................................................................... 2-1 Goal 2: Multimodal System .................................................................................................... 2-2 Goal 3: Livability ..................................................................................................................... 2-2 Goal 4: Safety ......................................................................................................................... 2-3 Goal 5: Funding ...................................................................................................................... 2-3 3. EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM INVENTORY ................................................................ 3-1 Roadway Network .................................................................................................................. 3-1 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities .......................................................................................... 3-13 Public Transit Services.......................................................................................................... 3-14 Air Facilities .......................................................................................................................... 3-15 Water Facilities .................................................................................................................... 3-16 Rail Facilities ......................................................................................................................... 3-16 Pipelines ............................................................................................................................... 3-17 4. EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM DEFICIENCIES ............................................................. 4-1 Traffic Volumes ...................................................................................................................... 4-1 Traffic Operations .................................................................................................................. 4-4 Crash History .......................................................................................................................... 4-8 Demographics ...................................................................................................................... 4-16 5. FUTURE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM DEFICIENCIES ............................................................... 5-1 Demographics ........................................................................................................................ 5-1 Future Traffic Volumes .......................................................................................................... 5-2 Traffic Operations .................................................................................................................. 5-4 6. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN .......................................................................................... 6-1 Roadway System Plan ............................................................................................................ 6-1 Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan ................................................................................................. 6-17 Public Transportation Plan ................................................................................................... 6-18 Rail Plan ................................................................................................................................ 6-19 Airport Plan .......................................................................................................................... 6-19 Pipeline Plan ......................................................................................................................... 6-19 Water Plan ........................................................................................................................... 6-19 Table of Contents i Coos County Transportation System Plan March 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page 7. TRANSPORTATION FINANCING .............................................................................................. 7-1 Existing Budgets ..................................................................................................................... 7-1 Overall Project Needs ............................................................................................................ 7-2 Evaluation of County Funding Needs and Potential Revenue ............................................... 7-3 Potential Funding Sources ..................................................................................................... 7-6 Expiring and Unlikely Funding Sources ................................................................................ 7-13 Funding Strategy .................................................................................................................. 7-17 APPENDIX Table of Contents ii Coos County Transportation System Plan March 2011 LIST OF TABLES Page Table 3-1. Summary of Roadway Mileage by Jurisdiction ........................................................... 3-1 Table 3-2. Major Collectors in Coos County ................................................................................ 3-3 Table 3-3. Minor Collectors in Coos County ................................................................................ 3-4 Table 3-4. Pavement Conditions Inventory – County Roads ....................................................... 3-5 Table 3-5. County Roads with Poor Pavement Conditions .......................................................... 3-5 Table 3-6. State Highways ............................................................................................................ 3-6 Table 3-7. Pavement Conditions Inventory – State Highways ..................................................... 3-9 Table 3-8. Functionally Obsolete and Structurally Deficient County Bridges ............................ 3-11 Table 3-9. Functionally Obsolete and Structurally Deficient State Bridges ............................... 3-12 Table 3-10. Rural Paved Shoulder Inventory on State Highways in Coos County ..................... 3-14 Table 3-11. Coos County Airports .............................................................................................. 3-15 Table 4-1. Traffic Volume Characteristics from ATR Sites within and near Coos County ........... 4-3 Table 4-2. State Highways Operational Standards ...................................................................... 4-5 Table 4-3. Summary of Two-Lane Highway Operations – Existing Condition (2008) .................. 4-7 Table 4-4. Summary of Intersection Operations – Existing Condition (2008) ............................. 4-8 Table 4-5. Crash History for County Roadways (2003-2007) ....................................................... 4-9 Table 4-6. Crash History for State Highways (2003-2007) ......................................................... 4-11 Table 4-7. Historic Crash Rates for State Highways ................................................................... 4-11 Table 4-8. SPIS and SIP Locations (2005-2007) – US 101 ........................................................... 4-13 Table 4-9. SPIS and SIP Locations (2005-2007) – OR 42 ...........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lost in Coos
    LOST IN COOS “Heroic Deeds and Thilling Adventures” of Searches and Rescues on Coos River Coos County, Oregon 1871 to 2000 by Lionel Youst Golden Falls Publishing LOST IN COOS Other books by Lionel Youst Above the Falls, 1992 She’s Tricky Like Coyote, 1997 with William R. Seaburg, Coquelle Thompson, Athabaskan Witness, 2002 She’s Tricky Like Coyote, (paper) 2002 Above the Falls, revised second edition, 2003 Sawdust in the Western Woods, 2009 Cover photo, Army C-46D aircraft crashed near Pheasant Creek, Douglas County – above the Golden and Silver Falls, Coos County, November 26, 1945. Photo furnished by Alice Allen. Colorized at South Coast Printing, Coos Bay. Full story in Chapter 4, pp 35-57. Quoted phrase in the subtitle is from the subtitle of Pioneer History of Coos and Curry Counties, by Orville Dodge (Salem, OR: Capital Printing Co., 1898). LOST IN COOS “Heroic Deeds and Thrilling Adventures” of Searches and Rescues on Coos River, Coos County, Oregon 1871 to 2000 by Lionel Youst Including material by Ondine Eaton, Sharren Dalke, and Simon Bolivar Cathcart Golden Falls Publishing Allegany, Oregon Golden Falls Publishing, Allegany, Oregon © 2011 by Lionel Youst 2nd impression Printed in the United States of America ISBN 0-9726226-3-2 (pbk) Frontier and Pioneer Life – Oregon – Coos County – Douglas County Wilderness Survival, case studies Library of Congress cataloging data HV6762 Dewey Decimal cataloging data 363 Youst, Lionel D., 1934 - Lost in Coos Includes index, maps, bibliography, & photographs To contact the publisher Printed at Portland State Bookstore’s Lionel Youst Odin Ink 12445 Hwy 241 1715 SW 5th Ave Coos Bay, OR 97420 Portland, OR 97201 www.youst.com for copies: [email protected] (503) 226-2631 ext 230 To Desmond and Everett How selfish soever man may be supposed, there are evidently some principles in his nature, which interest him in the fortune of others, and render their happiness necessary to him, though he derives nothing from it except the pleasure of seeing it.
    [Show full text]
  • Tsunami Inundation Map for Coos
    G E O L O G Y F A N O D STATE OF OREGON T Tsunami Inundation Map Coos-05 N M I E N DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES M E T R R A Tsunami Inundation Maps for Coos Bay - North Bend, A www. OregonGeology.org L Local Source (Cascadia Subduction Zone) Tsunami Inundation Map P I E Coos County, Oregon N D D Larry Givens, Governing Board Chair U N S O T Vicki S. McConnell, Director and State Geologist G R E Plate 1 I R E S O Don WT. Lewis, Assistant Director Coos Bay - North Bend, Oregon Rachel R. Lyles Smith, Project Operations Manager 2012 1937 Ian P. Madin, Chief Scientist 124°20'0"W 124°18'0"W 124°16'0"W 124°14'0"W 124°12'0"W L N TRANS-PACIFIC LN I C I F C A R O B I N R D - P 43°26'0"N S N D A R R T E V O C N N N L A D D OV E R W O J 100 S W A L L O W R D E A ! S T B A Y R D North Bay RFPD M Jordan A L L A R D L N Cove 43°26'0"N ¤£101 R O S E M T N L N 100 C o o 25 City of North Bend "7 s E . C . R D B "5 M C C L U R G L N 200 a 100 y 25 EAST BAY RD y L N E E City of North Bend S a R U O B C City of Coos Bay G O L F D s F E R R Y R o ¤£101 E V C A A o City of Coos Bay R L S O R R N P 25 H O R T S I S 100 M C N L I N A R I O North W R Pony E S P V E E A O Bend A I R R ! L P 100 T Fire N O Slough W R SHERMAN AVE T W E I L A V N Y Y A B 200 L O O P C O L O R A D O A V E O O D City of North Bend A R B AY S T O M L A O P C L E L E A F F S T F L O R I D A A V E M A P L E S T H AY E S S T A R T H U R S T J O H N S O N S T M O N TA N A A V E D C O N N E C T I C U T A V E T R S ¤£101 L L W E D A X A M E MCPHERSON AVE H U N I O N A V E L
    [Show full text]
  • Coos Bay BCS Number: 47-8
    Coos Bay BCS number: 47-8 ***NOTE: The completion of this site description is still in progress by our Primary Contact (listed below). However, if you would like to contribute additional information to this description, please contact the Klamath Bird Observatory at [email protected]. Site description author(s) Jennifer Powers Danielle Morris, Research and Monitoring Team, Klamath Bird Observatory Primary contact for this site Mike Graybill, South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve Manager. Telephone: 541-888-5558 ext. 24, e-mail: [email protected]. Site location (UTM) Datum: NAD83, Zone: 10, Easting: 394143, Northing: 4802686 General description The Coos Bay estuary covers 54 square miles of open channels and tide flats located near the towns of the Coos Bay and North Bend on the southern Oregon coast. The estuary ranges between a mile and a mile and a half wide. A 42 ft. deep, sixteen-mile long ship channel is maintained from the harbor entrance to the Port of Coos Bay. Numerous slough systems and freshwater channels flow into Coos Bay. The narrow estuary is maintained at its mouth by two rock jetties extending from North Spit on the north and Coos Head on the south. From the harbor entrance the main channel bears northward past the communities of Charleston, Barview and Empire, then east around the city of North Bend, and south past downtown Coos Bay. At Coos Bay the channel bears east to the mouth of the Coos River. About two miles upstream the river divides into the Millicoma River on the left and the South Fork of the Coos River on the right.
    [Show full text]
  • Relations Between Geology and Mass Movement Features in a Part of the East Fork Coquille River Watershed, Southern Coast Range, Oregon
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Jeffrey W. Lane for the degree of Master of Science in Geology presented on May 19, 1987 Title: Relations Between Geology and Mass Movement Features in a Part of the East Fork Coquille River Watershed, Southern Coast Range, Oregon Signature redacted for privacy. Abstract Approved: Frederick J. Swanson ABSTRACT Various types of mass movement features are found in the drainage basin of the East Fork Coquille River in the southern Oregon Coast Range. The distribution and forms of mass movement features in the area are related to geologic factors and the resultant topography. The Jurassic Otter Point Formation, a melange of low-grade metamor- phic and marine sedimentary rocks, is present in scattered outcrops in the southwest portion of the study area but is not extensive. The Tertiary Roseburg Formation consists primarily of bedded siltstone and is compressed into a series of west to northwest-striking folds. The overlying Lookingglass, Flournoy, and Tyee Formations consist of rhyth- mically bedded sandstone and siltstone units with an east to northeast- erly dip of 5-15°decreasing upward in the stratigraphic section. The units form cuesta ridges with up to 2000 feet of relief. The distribution of mass movements is demonstrably related to the bedrock geology and the study area topography. Debris avalanches are more common on the steep slopes underlain by Flournoy Formation and Tyee Formation sandstones, on the obsequent slope of cuesta ridges, and on north-facing slopes. Soil creep occurs throughout the study area and may be the pri- mary mass movement form in siltstone terrane, though soil creep was not studied in detail.
    [Show full text]
  • AN INVENTORY of MARITIME ANTIQUES and RELICS of the COOS BAY AREA REFLECTIONS of a SOMETIMES FORGOTTEN PAST by Gail E. Curtis Or
    AN INVENTORY OF MARITIME ANTIQUES AND RELICS OF THE COOS BAY AREA REFLECTIONS OF A SOMETIMES FORGOTTEN PAST By Gail E. Curtis Oregon Institute of Marine Biology Summer, 1975 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ,INTRODUCTION 1 - EXPLANATIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS 6 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OF THE INVENTORIED COLLECTIONS 7 MARITIME ANTIQUES AND RELICS 17 BOAT NAME PLATES 28 HALF MODELS 29 MARITIME LITERATURE 31 MARITIME MAPS, CHARTS, AND DRAWINGS 35 MARITIME PHOTOGRAPHS 39 LIFE SAVING STATION General History 75 LIFES SAVINGS CREW, STATION AND EQUIPMENT PHOTOGRAPHS.. 76 CAPE ARAGO LIGHTHOUSE PHOTOGRAPHS 78 JETTY CONSTRUCTIONS PHOTOGRAPHS BO EARLY MARSHFIELD PHOTOGRAPHS 83 SPECIAL COLLECTIONS Victor West 87 BIBLIOGRAPHY 92 DISTRIBUTION LIST 93 INTRODUCTION Coos Bay has always been tied to the sea. From the rich estuarys earliest settlement in the 1830s, its lines of supply Ind communication have been with the sea rather than the hinter- land across the Coast Range Mountains. Even as late as 1915 when the railroad came to southwestern Dregon, the sea, the bay, and the rivers of the Coos Bay region represented the main forms of coastwise trade with California and the inter-community trade from the farms and lumber camps of the interior to the urban market areas of Marshfield (Coos Bay) and later North Bend. In some respects,modern Coos Bay remains even more tied to the sea than in the past. Emerging as a major port of international trade, mainly through the export of its forest products, Coos Bays leaders recognize their communitys future fortune lies with the sea, for a form of transportation, an important food supply, and a desirable periphery for a living environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Above the Falls
    Revised, Second Edition Revised, Second Edition ABOVE THE FALLS Second Edition Joe Schapers’ homestead on Upper Glenn Creek, 1913 ABOVE THE FALLS Second Edition An Oral and Folk History of Upper Glenn Creek, Coos County, Oregon by Lionel Youst Including tape-recorded interviews, narratives, and other material by Alice Wilkinson Allen, Warren Browning, Belle Leaton Clarke, Hattie Leaton Cotter, Helen Cummings, Lillian Austin Edgehill, Wilma Leaton Hoellig, Allen Lively, Charles Middleton, Robert Milton, Erma Ott, Harold Ott, Jerry Phillips, Elwin Saling, Franklyn E. Smith, Marvin Stemmerman, Patricia Wilkinson, and George Youst. Written at Allegany, Oregon, September 1991 to September 1992, with revisions based on material received between 1992 and 2003. Golden Falls Publishing Allegany, Oregon Golden Falls Publishing, Allegany, Oregon © 2003 by Lionel Youst All rights reserved. First edition 1992 Second edition 2003 First impression 2003 Printed in the United States of America ISBN 0-9726226-0-8 ISBN 0-9726226-1-6 (pbk.) Library of Congress cataloging data: F882.C7 Dewey Decimal cataloging data: 979.523 Youst, Lionel D., 1934 - Above The Falls, Second Edition Includes index, maps, bibliography, & photographs Frontier and Pioneer Life – Oregon – Coos County Logging – Oregon – Coos County – History Lumber Trade – Oregon – Coos County – History Coos County, Oregon – History Quotations at the beginning of each of the major parts of this book are from Rethinking Home: A Case for Writing Local History, by Joseph A. Amato, University of California Press (2002). They are used here with permission from the Regents of the University of California. Passages from A Century of Coos and Curry, by Peterson and Powers (1952), and Glancing Back (1972) are used with permission from the Coos County Historical Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Bandon Hatchery
    BANDON HATCHERY PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PLAN 2020 Bandon Hatchery (Beaver Creek, Big Creek Pond, Blossom, Charleston, Cunningham Creek, Coquille, Eel Creek, Ferry Creek, Hodges, Laverne Park, Millicoma Pond, Morgan Creek, Noble Creek, Saunders, Sevenmile Creek, Tenmile and Woodward Creek Acclimation Sites) INTRODUCTION Bandon Hatchery is located one mile east of the City of Bandon. The site is at an elevation of approximately 98 feet above sea level, at latitude 43.1161 and longitude -124.3842. Total land area is 32.7 acres. The hatchery water supply is obtained from two sources: Ferry Creek and Geiger Creek. Water from both sources is supplied by gravity. Starting on October 13, 2017, 3.5 cfs was transferred to the hatchery in which 2.5 was dedicated for fish production and 1 cfs for instream rights. This now gives the hatchery a combined total of 5.5 cfs. The facility is staffed with 3.0 FTE's. Rearing Facilities at Bandon Hatchery Unit Unit Unit Unit Unit Number Total Construction Type Length Width Depth Volume Units Volume Material Age Condition Comment (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft3) (ft3) Adult Holding Pond 80 20 3.25 5200 1 5200 concrete 1950 poor spawning building built over first 20' of pond Raceway 120 20 3.5 8400 1 8400 concrete 1950 fair Raceway 110 20 3.67 8074 1 8074 concrete 1950 fair Raceway 50 20 5.5 5500 1 5500 concrete 1937 poor used for settling pond for vacuum sludge Raceway 45 15 2.5 1688 1 1688 concrete 1950 good Raceway 100 20 3.5 7000 1 7000 concrete 1950 poor used as acclimation ponds Raceways 100 20 3.5 7000 2 14000 concrete 1958 good Troughs 16 3.2 2 102 2 205 concrete 1958 fair Troughs 16.75’ 2.2 3 110.55 2 221.1 fiberglass 2018 excellent Troughs 16 2.5 1.33 53 4 213 fiberglass 1991 good Vertical incubators 448 2003 excellent 28 stacks of 16 trays PURPOSE Bandon Hatchery was constructed in 1925 and facility operations are funded by the State of Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • DOGAMI Open-File Report O-16-02, Landslide Susceptibility Overview
    State of Oregon Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Brad Avy, State Geologist OPEN-FILE REPORT O-16-02 LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY OVERVIEW MAP OF OREGON By William J. Burns1, Katherine A. Mickelson1, and Ian P. Madin1 G E O L O G Y F A N O D T N M I E N M E T R R A A L P I E N D D U N S O T G R E I R E S O 1937 2016 1Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, 800 NE Oregon Street, Suite 965, Portland, Oregon 97232 Landslide Susceptibility Overview Map of Oregon NOTICE This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information. This publication cannot substitute for site-specific investigations by qualified practitioners. Site-specific data may give results that differ from the results shown in the publication. Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Open-File Report O-16-02 Published in conformance with ORS 516.030 For additional information: Administrative Offices 800 NE Oregon Street, Suite 965 Portland, OR 97232 Telephone (971) 673-1555 Fax (971) 673-1562 http://www.oregongeology.org http://www.oregon.gov/DOGAMI/ ii Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Open-File Report O-16-02 Landslide Susceptibility Overview Map of Oregon TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 REPORT SUMMARY ..............................................................................................1 2.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Fork Coquille Watershed Analysis Was Because of Riparian Reserve Density Management Treatments Proposed in the Slater Rocks EA
    WATERSHED ANALYSIS MIDDLE FORK COQUILLE ANALYTICAL WATERSHED Version 1.1 Bureau of Land Management Coos Bay District Myrtlewood Resource Area October 2007 Approved by: ___________________________________ Myrtlewood Area Manager Note to reader: The reason for the second version (version 1.1) of the Middle Fork Coquille Watershed Analysis was because of Riparian Reserve density management treatments proposed in the Slater Rocks EA. Density management in Riparian Reserves was added to this Watershed Analysis as Issue 10: Density Management Treatments within Riparian Reserves. TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary......................................................................1 Introduction.................................................................5 Description of the Middle Fork Coquille Analytical Watershed.................7 Table 1. Land Ownership, basin area, and stream miles.......................7 Beneficial Uses/Values.......................................................8 Land Allocations.............................................................9 Table 2. BLM Land Allocations..............................................12 Fig. 1: Location of Coquille River in Oregon...............................13 Fig. 2: Coquille River Basin with Key Watersheds...........................14 Issues Evaluated in the Analysis............................................15 Issue 1: Native Fish Stocks................................................15 Issue 2: Riparian Condition................................................18 Issue 3: Aquatic Habitat...................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Connect Oregon V Final Recommendation
    Final Recommendation Report ConnectOregon V Final Review Committee June 11, 2014 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................3 2 ConnectOregon V Program Development ...........................................................................3 2.1 Policy Team Guidance ..................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Administrative Rule Development ................................................................................... 3 2.3 Application Procedures Development .............................................................................. 4 3 ConnectOregon V Review Prior to the Final Review Committee ......................................4 3.1 Completeness, Eligibility and Feasibility Review ........................................................... 4 3.1.1 Economic Benefit Review ........................................................................................ 4 3.1.2 Statutory Consideration Review ............................................................................... 5 3.1.3 Tiers .......................................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Instructions to Reviewers ................................................................................................. 6 3.3 Committee Review ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Coquille River Basin, Southwestern Oregon
    Preliminary Assessment of Channel Stability and Bed-Material Transport in the Coquille River Basin, Southwestern Oregon By Krista L. Jones, Jim E. O’Connor, Mackenzie K. Keith, Joseph F. Mangano, and J. Rose Wallick Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Oregon Department of State Lands Open-File Report 2012–1064 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: South Fork Coquille River in the Broadbent Reach (Photograph by Krista L. Jones, U.S. Geological Survey, July 2010.) Preliminary Assessment of Channel Stability and Bed-Material Transport in the Coquille River Basin, Southwestern Oregon By Krista L. Jones, Jim E. O’Connor, Mackenzie K. Keith, Joseph F. Mangano, and J. Rose Wallick Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Oregon Department of State Lands Open-File Report 2012–1064 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.govFor more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Jones, K.L., O’Connor, J.E., Keith, M.K., Mangano, J.F., and Wallick, J.R., 2012, Preliminary assessment of channel stability and bed-material transport in the Coquille River basin, southwestern Oregon: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Coos County Flood Insurance Study, P14216.AO, Scales 1:12,000 and 1:24,000, Portland, Oregon, September 1980
    FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY COOS COUNTY, OREGON AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER BANDON, CITY OF 410043 COOS BAY, CITY OF 410044 COOS COUNTY (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 410042 COQUILLE, CITY OF 410045 LAKESIDE, CITY OF 410278 MYRTLE POINT, CITY OF 410047 NORTH BEND, CITY OF 410048 POWERS, CITY OF 410049 Revised: March 17, 2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 41011CV000B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: September 25, 2009 Revised Countywide FIS Date: March 17, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose of Study ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]