Under-Vaccinated Groups in Europe: Who Are They and How to Communicate with Them in Outbreak Situations?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Under-Vaccinated Groups in Europe: Who Are They and How to Communicate with Them in Outbreak Situations? Under-vaccinated Groups in Europe: Who are they and how to communicate with them in outbreak situations? Work Package 6 - EU project Effective communication in Outbreak management Development of an evidence-based tool for Europe E-com@EU is coordinated by Prof. dr. Jan Hendrik Richardus, Erasmus University Rotterdam. This EU project is directed at development of an evidence-based behavioural and communication package to respond to major epidemic outbreaks. Seite 1 von 87 Writing of the report: Part I: Identification and description of under-vaccinated groups in three European countries and their beliefs regarding vaccination Nelly Fournet - Epidemiology and Surveillance Unit, Centre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), the Netherlands. - European Programme for Intervention Epidemiology Training (EPIET), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden (Parts on UVGs in Romania and Portugal were written by collaborators, see list page 3) Part II - Communication and behavioural influence tactics recommendations Jeff French Strategic Social Marketing Ltd. Hampshire, United Kingdom Corresponding authors: Part I: Jim van Steenbergen Preparedness and Response Unit National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands Tel: +31 (0)30 274 2528 - Fax: +31 (0)30 274 2528 or 7000 (secr) Email: [email protected] Part II: Jeff French Strategic Social Marketing Strategic Social Marketing Ltd Attabara, Conford, Hants, GU307QW United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)1428 751 475 www.strategic-social-marketing.org Seite 2 von 87 Collaborators who contributed to the report (alphabetical order): • Franklin Apfel, World Health Communication Associates, United Kingdom • Gratiana Chicin, National Institute for Public Health, Romania Chapter on NIP in Romania (Part I, Appendixe 15.1) • Jean-Yves Durand, Instituto de Ciências Sociais - Universidade do Minho, CRIA, Portugal Chapter on Roma communities, macrobiotics and critical citizens in Portugal (Part I, chapter 5.5.) • Nelly Fournet, Epidemiology and Surveillance Unit, RIVM, the Netherlands • Jeff French. Strategic Social Marketing, United Kingdom • Irene Harmsen, Epidemiology and Surveillance Unit, RIVM, the Netherlands Review methodology, Anthroposophists, determinants and matrix parts (Part I) • Manuela Ivone Cunha, Instituto de Ciências Sociais - Universidade do Minho, CRIA, Portugal Chapter on Roma communities, macrobiotics and critical citizens in Portugal (Part I, chapter 5.5.) • Frederic Keck, Sociology and anthropology department - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, France • Aileen Kitching, Immunisation Department, Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance & Control (CIDSC), Public Health England, United Kingdom Review report (Part I) • Liesbeth Mollema, Epidemiology and Surveillance Unit, RIVM, the Netherlands Supervision of Part I of the report • Ria Reis, Sociology and anthropology department from the University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands • Helma Ruijs, Preparedness and Response Unit, RIVM, the Netherlands Review of the Orthodox Protestants and determinants parts (Part I) • Edith Smith, Persuasive communication Department - University of Amsterdam & Leiden Medical University Center the Netherlands • Jim van Steenbergen, Preparedness and Response Unit, RIVM, the Netherlands Project leader • Paula Valente, Direcção-Geral da Saúde, Portugal Chapter on NIP in Portugal (Part I, Appendixe 15.1) • Marius Wamsiedel, Romani CRISS, Romania Chapter on Roma population in Romania (Part I, chapter 5.4.) • Piotr Wysocki, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) Sweden Seite 3 von 87 Table of contents Writing of the report: ................................................................................................................ 2 Collaborators who contributed to the report (alphabetical order): ............................................. 3 Table of contents ..................................................................................................................... 4 Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................... 6 Foreword ................................................................................................................................. 7 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 8 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................10 1.1 Designing communication strategies for under-vaccinated groups ................................10 1.2 Aim of this Work Package..............................................................................................10 1.3 Case definition of an Under-Vaccinated Group (UVG) ...................................................10 2. Introduction and objectives ..............................................................................................13 3. Methodology ....................................................................................................................14 3.1 Selection of the three countries .....................................................................................14 3.2 First two steps of the Intervention Mapping approach ....................................................14 3.2.1 The needs assessment: identification and description of the UVGs, and of the determinants of poor vaccine uptake among those groups.............................................. 14 3.2.2 Definition of performance and programme objectives ............................................ 15 4. Results: Identified under-vaccinated groups in the three selected European countries ....16 4.1 Identified UVGs .............................................................................................................16 4.2 UVGs in Europe ............................................................................................................16 4.3 The Orthodox Protestant Denominations (The Netherlands) .........................................17 4.3.1 Background ........................................................................................................... 17 4.3.2. Beliefs about vaccination ...................................................................................... 18 4.3.3 Vaccination coverage ............................................................................................ 19 4.3.4 Community Outbreaks .......................................................................................... 19 4.4 The Anthroposophists (The Netherlands) ......................................................................19 4.4.1 Background ........................................................................................................... 20 4.4.2 Beliefs about vaccination ....................................................................................... 20 4.4.3 Vaccination coverage ............................................................................................ 23 4.4.4 Outbreaks in their community............................................................................... 23 4.5 The Dutch Association for critical vaccination (NVKP) (The Netherlands) ......................23 4.5.1 Background ........................................................................................................... 24 4.5.2 Beliefs about vaccination ....................................................................................... 24 4.5.3 Vaccination coverage ............................................................................................ 25 4.5.4 Outbreaks ............................................................................................................. 25 4.6 Roma population (central/eastern/south-eastern Europe and Portugal) .........................25 4.6.1 Background ........................................................................................................... 26 4.6.2 Vaccination – attitudes and behaviour .................................................................. 26 4.6.3 Vaccination coverage ............................................................................................ 29 4.6.4 Outbreaks in Roma community ............................................................................. 29 4.7 Macrobiotics and critical citizens (Portugal) ...................................................................29 4.7.1 Alternative dietary systems: macrobiotics .............................................................. 30 4.7.2 Critical citizens (critical vaccine acceptors or vaccine refusers) .............................. 31 5. Determinants of non-vaccination by UVG ........................................................................35 6. Theoretical vaccination behaviour model .........................................................................37 6.1 Existing theoretical vaccination behavior model for the general population in the Netherlands .........................................................................................................................37 7. Determinants and performance objectives .......................................................................39 7.1 Selection of determinants of poor vaccine uptake ..........................................................39
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 2 Religious Subgroups Influencing Vaccination Coverage in the Dutch Bible Belt: an Ecological Study
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Religious subgroups influencing vaccination coverage in the Dutch Bible belt: an ecological study Ruijs, W.L.M.; Hautvast, J.L.A.; van der Velden, K.; de Vos, S.; Knippenberg, H.; Hulscher, M.E.J.L. Publication date 2012 Document Version Final published version Published in Acceptance of vaccination among orthodox protestants in the Netherlands Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Ruijs, W. L. M., Hautvast, J. L. A., van der Velden, K., de Vos, S., Knippenberg, H., & Hulscher, M. E. J. L. (2012). Religious subgroups influencing vaccination coverage in the Dutch Bible belt: an ecological study. In W. L. M. Ruijs (Ed.), Acceptance of vaccination among orthodox protestants in the Netherlands (pp. 25-43) http://repository.ubn.ru.nl/handle/2066/98582 General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beggars of Holland and the Grandees of Spain
    THE BEGGARS OF HOLLAND AND THE GRANDEES OF SPAIN. A HISTORY OF THE REFORMATION IN THE NETHERLANDS, F ROM A. D. 1200 TO 1578. (7/ BY THE A? Rm. JOHN ‘w. ‘MEARg, D.D. PHILADELPHIA: PRESBYTERIAN PUBLICATION COMMITTEE, 1334 CHESTNUT STREET. 1m! You: A. v. r. muons, 770 BaoAnwn “AJ'\I'\J"\/‘\./‘\."\ p"\.f\.MM’mWN\/\.f\/\_r‘\/\f\./\M Entered according to the Act of Congress, in the year 1867, by WM. L. HILDEBURN, TREASURER, in trust for the PRESBYTERIAN PUBLICATION COMMITTEE, In the Clerk’s Oflice of the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Wzs'roo'r'r _& Tnomsou, Stereotypere, Philada. Spoiling the Cathedral at Antwerp. Bnggars of Holland. Frontispioce. See P. 243. CONTENTS. PM}! THE NETHERLANDS.--.................. 5 EARLY 15 THE LAST STRAW.......... 30 ERASMUS............................. 36 ERASMUS (continued)............................................. 48 LUTHER’s ATTACK ON INDULGENCES........................ 60 FIRST MARTYRs OF THE REFORMATION.................... 71 PLACARDS 0F CHARLES 88 CONCLUSION OF THE REIGN OF CHARLES V.—(1550-’55.) 101 THE STRUGGLE DEEPENS—COMMENCEMENT 0F PHILIP’s 114 OFFICERS AND VICTIMS OF THE INQUISITION............ 124 STORY OF ANGELUs 135 SYMPTOMS 0F REVQLT........... 144 THE ANABAPTISTS................................................. 153 STATE OF THE CHURCH AND COUNTRY..................... 175 WILLIAM OF 188 THE SIGNAL FOR THE 197 THE LEAGUE OF Nexus—THE BEWARE OF HOLLAND. 210 3 4 CONTENTS. PAGI OPEN-Am PREACHING............................................ 219 THE IMAGE-BREAKING FURY ....... 232 CONcmsIONs To THE REFORMED.................. 253 POSITION ANI) EFFORTS OF THE PRINCE OF ORANGE.' 266 ARMED RESISTANCE—SIEGE 0F VALENCIENNI'B......... 273 THE DUCHESS TRIES TO WIN THE PRINCE OF ORANGE —HIs 285 THE DUKE 0F 291 THE ALARM DEEPENED—THE BLOOD COUNCIL........
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Calvinism: B
    Introduction A. Special Terminology I. The Persons Understanding Calvinism: B. Distinctive Traits A. John Calvin 1. Governance Formative Years in France: 1509-1533 An Overview Study 2. Doctrine Ministry Years in Switzerland: 1533-1564 by 3. Worship and Sacraments Calvin’s Legacy III. Psycology and Sociology of the Movement Lorin L Cranford IV. Biblical Assessment B. Influencial Interpreters of Calvin Publication of C&L Publications. II. The Ideology All rights reserved. © Conclusion INTRODUCTION1 Understanding the movement and the ideology la- belled Calvinism is a rather challenging topic. But none- theless it is an important topic to tackle. As important as any part of such an endeavour is deciding on a “plan of attack” in getting into the topic. The movement covered by this label “Calvinism” has spread out its tentacles all over the place and in many different, sometimes in conflicting directions. The logical starting place is with the person whose name has been attached to the label, although I’m quite sure he would be most uncomfortable with most of the content bearing his name.2 After exploring the history of John Calvin, we will take a look at a few of the more influential interpreters of Calvin over the subsequent centuries into the present day. This will open the door to attempt to explain the ideology of Calvinism with some of the distinctive terms and concepts associated exclusively with it. I. The Persons From the digging into the history of Calvinism, I have discovered one clear fact: Calvinism is a religious thinking in the 1500s of Switzerland when he lived and movement that goes well beyond John Calvin, in some worked.
    [Show full text]
  • FORMS of UNITY OR of DISUNITY the CONFESSIONS in the RECENT HISTORY of the PROTESTANT CHURCH in the NETHERLANDS Henk Van Den
    CHAPTER ELEVEN FORMS OF UNITY OR OF DISUNITY THE CONFESSIONS IN THE RECENT HISTORY OF THE PROTESTANT CHURCH IN THE NETHERLANDS Henk van den Belt Th e confessions of the Reformed churches in the Netherlands, the Bel- gic Confession, the Heidelberg Catechism, and the Canons of Dordt, are sometimes called the Forms of Unity.1 Th e term ‘unity’ refers to the unity of the catholic and apostolic faith of which the confessions intend to be an expression. In practice, however, the forms can also lead to disunity, as the recent schism in the Dutch churches shows. On the 1st of May, 2004, the Protestant Church in the Netherlands originated as a continuation of the Netherlands Reformed Church (Nederlandse Her- vormde Kerk), the Reformed Churches in the Netherlands (Gerefor- meerde Kerken in Nederland) and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in the Kingdom of the Netherlands (Evangelisch-Lutherse Kerk).2 On that same day the Restored Reformed Church (Hersteld Hervormde Kerk) began—regarding itself as a continuation of the Netherlands Reformed Church.3 More than 100 congregations split. Th ousands of members 1 It is diffi cult to trace the exact source of the Dutch expression formulieren van enigheid, but it was used since the Arminian Controversy. Pastors and professors were obliged to sign the confessions. Church Order of Dordrecht, article 53. Even before the synod of Dordt the Belgic Confession and the Heidelberg Catechism were called the “formulieren der Christelycker eenicheyt.” Ireneus Philaletius [ps. of Ewout Teellinck], Querela ecclesiae. Oft e Clachte der kercke aende overheden des lants (Querela ecclesiae: Or Complaint of the Church to the Government of the Country), (Amsterdam: M.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Judaizing and Singularity in England, 1618-1667
    Judaizing and Singularity in England, 1618-1667 Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Aidan Francis Cottrell-Boyce, Gonville and Caius College, June 2018. For Anna. Abstract In the seventeenth century, in England, a remarkable number of small, religious movements began adopting demonstratively Jewish ritual practices. They were labelled by their contemporaries as Judaizers. Typically, this phenomenon has been explained with reference to other tropes of Puritan practical divinity. It has been claimed that Judaizing was a form of Biblicism or a form of millenarianism. In this thesis, I contend that Judaizing was an expression of another aspect of the Puritan experience: the need to be recognized as a ‘singular,’ positively- distinctive, separated minority. Contents Introduction 1 Singularity and Puritanism 57 Judaizing and Singularity 99 ‘A Jewish Faccion’: Anti-legalism, Judaizing and the Traskites 120 Thomas Totney, Judaizing and England’s Exodus 162 The Tillamites, Judaizing and the ‘Gospel Work of Separation’ 201 Conclusion 242 Introduction During the first decades of the seventeenth century in England, a remarkable number of small religious groups began to adopt elements of Jewish ceremonial law. In London, in South Wales, in the Chilterns and the Cotswolds, congregations revived the observation of the Saturday Sabbath.1 Thomas Woolsey, imprisoned for separatism, wrote to his co-religionists in Amsterdam to ‘prove it unlawful to eat blood and things strangled.’2 John Traske and his followers began to celebrate Passover
    [Show full text]
  • Apostolaire Bewogenheid Voorwerkt.Indd
    VU Research Portal Hoe apostolaire bewogenheid een onbeweegbare kerk in beweging brengt van Kooten, R. 2013 document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in VU Research Portal citation for published version (APA) van Kooten, R. (2013). Hoe apostolaire bewogenheid een onbeweegbare kerk in beweging brengt: Onderzoek naar de oorsprong en bedoelingen van hoofdthema's van de kerkorde van 1951. Uitgeverij De Banier. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. E-mail address: [email protected] Download date: 26. Sep. 2021 581 Summary How apostolic momentum brings a rigid church in motion Research into the origin and intent of the main themes of the Church Order of 1951 The apostolate is widely recognized as the determinative paradigm of the Church Order of 1951. This study does not examine the apostolate as such, but the question of how apostolic impetus has put a rigid church in motion and freed it from the ‘Babylonian exile of the General Rule’ that king Willem I imposed on the Dutch Reformed Church (NHK) in 1816.
    [Show full text]
  • 81St General Assembly
    MINUTES of the EIGHTY-FIRST GENERAL ASSEMBLY Meeting at Kuyper College Grand Rapids, Michigan June 4–9, 2014 and YEARBOOK of THE ORTHODOX PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH Published by THE ORTHODOX PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 607 N. Easton Road, Building E Willow Grove, Pennsylvania 19090-2539 USA FOREWORD The three sections of this volume are the following: MINUTES – the journal of the daily sessions of the Assembly. Although the Minutes do not contain the documents that appear in the second section (Appendix), they do contain the recommendations made in those documents; those recommendations appear in the Minutes at the point where they were considered. For ease of reference and cross-reference, the Minutes are divided into articles, denoted by the symbol §. In the Index that symbol, in boldface type, indicates reference to articles in the Minutes; page numbers refer to the Appendix and the Yearbook. APPENDIX – the documents submitted to the Assembly by presbyteries, committees of the Church, and other bodies, for the Assembly’s consideration. With the exception of overtures, communications, and complaints, the several documents appear in the Appendix in the order in which they are normally presented to the Assembly. All references to documents in the Appendix are by page number, in both the Minutes and the Index. YEARBOOK – general information about the denomination. References to items in this section are by page number. ABBREVIATIONS used in this volume for the Standards of the Church BCO The Book of Church Order FG Form of Government BD Book of Discipline SR Standing Rules WCF Westminster Confession of Faith WLC Westminster Larger Catechism WSC Westminster Shorter Catechism The Clerk welcomes suggestions for the improvement of these annual volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Review Theology & Religious Studies
    RESEARCH REVIEW THEOLOGY & RELIGIOUS STUDIES Quality Assurance Netherlands Universities (QANU) Catharijnesingel 56 PO Box 8035 3503 RA Utrecht The Netherlands Phone: +31 (0) 30 230 3100 Telefax: +31 (0) 30 230 3129 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.qanu.nl © 2013 QANU Q 354 Text and numerical material from this publication may be reproduced in print, by photocopying or by any other means with the permission of QANU if the source is mentioned. 2 QANU / Research Review Theology and Religious Studies 2012 Contents 1. The review Committee and the review procedures........................................................................5 2. General remarks ..................................................................................................................................7 3. Theological Universities Apeldoorn and Kampen.......................................................................13 3A. Institute level.............................................................................................................................13 3B. Programme level.......................................................................................................................21 4. Protestant Theological University...................................................................................................27 4A. Institute level.............................................................................................................................27 4B. Programme level.......................................................................................................................33
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Netherlands Mission of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, 1861-1966
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1967 History of the Netherlands Mission of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, 1861-1966 Keith Crandall Warner Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Missions and World Christianity Commons, and the Mormon Studies Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Warner, Keith Crandall, "History of the Netherlands Mission of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, 1861-1966" (1967). Theses and Dissertations. 5196. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/5196 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. 0 7 N xkz sa 05 s4 4 777-277gsa W 7 Y t 7 T 0 7rar T HE 2 Z X E T ff A azzz 31 rl S S4 of v k41 4 I1 1 I1 votTOT DE WEADEO-er&oeeeitebeeerun6eniteD E arsteurste OBPOB otttoattPezeplat5plant5planta PERDER oba0 STUSVAN DEHEILIGN OKNAN jezosdhrlstusJIWCHRI abnb GOOOPTGFDOOPT TST DAGENgagen IM neberlnb tsi enoude padpaa MRS lat&ehaouwou 5noude jtiqlwiNVCGERS t EllZABETHET tonerfOnER ellzabethfoner r i P therktkerkjuuJKLu5ua chrstcarst h OPGERIGHTPG doordert STDAGE WTSTVAGW 1 1 l chnijgeheaDER r c-l T tt1861 Y x1xa S t7ta kalkamtal ivwirw HISTORY OF zheTHE netherlands MISSION OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTERDAYLATTER llylayDAY SAINTS 1861 1966 A thesis
    [Show full text]
  • Luxmundi 25 No 4 December 2006
    Lux mundi_2006_02_combi.indd, Spread 1 van 2 - Pagina’s (2, 1) 31-05-2006 23.30 LuxMundi 25 No 4 December 2006 Published quarterly by the Committee on Relations with Churches Abroad of the Reformed Churches in The Netherlands LuxMundi 25 No 4 December 2006 Editorial Published quarterly by the Committee By R. ter Beek, p. 79 on Relations with churches Abroad of the Reformed Churches in Walkers in the sun The Netherlands By P.H.R. van Houwelingen, p. 81 Volume 25 - No. 4 December 2006 A Silver ‘Lux Mundi’, I.C.R.C.’s Child Editors: Rev. J.M. Batteau By G. van Rongen, p. 82 Rev. R. ter Beek Mr. P.G.B. de Vries 25 years of Lux Mundi Rev. P.P.H. Waterval By K. Wezeman, p. 84 Mrs. S. Wierenga-Tucker Reformed North America Design: BVGO - Age Jan van Veelen By F. G. Oosterhoff, p. 86 www.bvgo.nl My impressions By R.S. Ward, p. 88 Reformed churches in The Netherlands By R.C. Janssen, p. 89 A short impression By Duke Shin, p. 95 Where do we stand now? By DKE and CCS, p. 96 Address for editorial and administrative matters (subscriptions, change of address): Chosen church of God Lux Mundi / office BBK By B. Luiten, p. 99 P.O. Box 499 8000 AL ZWOLLE Advocate of the Liturgy The Netherlands Phone: ++31(0)38 4270470 of God’s Covenant E-mail: [email protected] By J. Smelik, p. 102 http://www.bbk.gkv.nl Bank account 1084.32.556 News update Adm.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Rights Talk and Bible Speak: the Implementation of Equal Treatment Legislation in Orthodox Reformed Communities in the Netherlands
    HUMAN RIGHTS QUARTERLY Between Rights Talk and Bible Speak: The Implementation of Equal Treatment Legislation in Orthodox Reformed Communities in The Netherlands Barbara Oomen* Abstract This article discusses the responses to a number of recent court cases con- cerning the equal treatment of women and homosexuals amongst Dutch orthodox reformed in the semi-public sphere (e.g. political parties, schools). In doing so, this article applies and refines legal anthropological theories on the realization of rights in a context of cultural and religious diversity. It also specifically addresses the responses to court cases launched “from the outside” in the context of a western country with a tradition of code law. These cases have an adverse effect on discussions of equal treatment within the communities concerned. I. INTRODUCTION In 2005, a group of Dutch human rights nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) appeared in front of the civil court to contest the right of the SGP * Barbara Oomen holds a chair in the sociology of rights at the Roosevelt Academy (Utrecht University) and holds an endowed chair in Legal Pluralism at the University of Amsterdam. Her socio-legal research concerns themes of human rights and cultural diversity. Research into chieftaincy and constitutionalism in South Africa earned her the Law & Society Association dissertation award. Her work on the local legitimacy of transitional justice was partly carried out with a Fulbright New Century Scholarship. Recent work focuses upon constitutional- ism and citizenship in the Netherlands. Oomen is a member of the Constitutional Review Commission and the Commission on Human Rights of the Advisory Council on International Affairs in the Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Foreign Funding of Religious Institutions in the Netherlands
    Study on foreign funding of religious institutions in the Netherlands Executive summary Stijn Hoorens, Fook Nederveen, Jacco Snippe, Jorine de Muijnck en Maurits Sijtstra For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RRA736-1 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif., and Cambridge, UK R® is a registered trademark. © 2020; Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek- en Documentatiecentrum. Originally published in 2020, this report was amended slightly in January, 2021 to correct a small inaccuracy. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the WODC. Cover image: Fatih-Moskee, Rozengracht Amsterdam. Shared by Henk-Jan van der Klis, No known copyright restrictions, Creative Common License via Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/hjvanderklis/27587994929 RAND Europe is a not-for-profit research organisation that helps to improve policy and decision making through research and analysis. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org www.randeurope.org Executive Summary In the Netherlands, religious institutions are responsible for funding their own religious activities. Based on the principle of separation of church and state, the Dutch government has not contributed to funding religious institutions and their activities since 1982. Religious institutions, therefore, primarily rely on donations from within their own community. In addition, they can raise funds from other private individuals, foundations and private organisations.
    [Show full text]